OTTAWA MEN'S CENTRE

LEGAL RESOURCES

ONTARIO COURT  OF APPEAL JUDGES

This is a judge who has a hell of a notorious record for denying fundamental rights.

Gerstner v. Borg Feb 10, 1999 Doc. CA C29403  Austin

 

The Honourable Justice Kathryn N. Feldman

Brief (OFFICIAL) Biographical Note of Justice Kathryn N. Feldman

Justice Feldman received her B.A. from the University of Toronto in 1970 and her LL.B. from the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law in 1973, where she was co-editor of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review and recipient of the Dean's Key. She is a former partner of the firm of Blake, Cassels & Graydon where she practised in the areas of civil litigation and administrative law. Justice Feldman was appointed as a Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) on December 24, 1990 and sat on the Commercial List as well as on criminal and civil matters. She was appointed to the Court of Appeal for Ontario on June 11, 1998. Since her appointment to the Bench, Justice Feldman has participated in numerous continuing legal education programs for law students, lawyers and judges as a lecturer and seminar leader, and has served as a frequent member of the final bench of a number of moot courts. She has served as the Chair and Co-chair of the Insurance Committee of the Canadian Superior Court Judges Association since 1992, and in January 2001 she became the first recipient of the Canadian Superior Court Judges Association President’s Award. As an alumna of the U. of T., she served on the Moss Scholarship Selection Committee of the University of Toronto Alumni Association for six years, three years as Chair, and is a recipient of the Toronto Arbor Award. She is currently a member of the University of Toronto President’s International Alumni Council (PIAC).

 

The following information about Justice Kathrn N. Feldman is supplied by Peter Roscoe who has done a great deal of work detailing the bias against men by judges.

"It can be concluded that on a family issue a woman has a 73.5 % chance of winning, and a man has a 22.8 % % chance of winning when appearing before a panel with Justice Feldman on it. Success as decided by cost penalties assigned was 13.2 % in favour of men, 62.3 % in favour of females, and divided 24.5 % of the time."

 

This is the beginning of the remake on the C of A. Another law school thesis. The one they want to publish. Feldmans one of the worst. I'm just figuring how to present data. Sorry the appendix isn't currently well explained. Have stats for 25 C of A judges. While individual categories may be low data by the tme they are compiled for all judges confidence can be achieved. You can show discrimination by year, judge, and issue. I believe $ values for costs will be compiled for the total, not individual judges.
 
Peter Roscoe
 
 

                      Judicial Bias at the Court of Appeal 2007

 

      Peter Karl Roscoe

 

  Apr 2006, Revised Sept 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Justice Feldman, a summary of family decisions produces

 

 

Appellant

Custody

 Access

 Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

Number of Males

     7

     5

     0

     11

      7

         10

    10

    53

Number of Male Wins

     0

     2

     0

      4

      1

          2

     4

     7

 

 

Appellant

Custody

 Access

Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

Number of Females

     2

     0

     1

      9

      7

          5

    11

     53

Number of Female Wins

     1

     0

     1

      9

      6

          2

     7

     33

 

 

Summarized in percentage terms

 

 

Appellant

Custody

 Access

Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

% Chance of Male Win

     0.0

   40.0

     NA

    36.4

    14.3

       20.0

  40.0

   13.2

% Chance of Female Win

   50.0

    NA

   100.0

   100.0

    85.7

       40.0

  63.6

   62.3

 

 

It can be concluded that on a family issue a woman has a (58/87 x 100) 66.7 % chance of winning, and a man has a (20/110 x 100) 18.2 % % chance of winning when appearing before a panel with Justice Feldman on it. Success as decided by cost penalties assigned was 13.2 % in favor of men, 62.3 % in favor of females and divided 24.5 % of the time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix A

 

 

 

Legend

 

 

Sex of Lawyer                     M = Male                       F = Female                 Sr = Self Represented

                                                     (m) = Hired by the Man             (f) = Hired by the woman

 

 

 

Cost Penalty              (w) Woman Wins         (m) = Man Wins         nc = No Costs  

                            

                                                           res = Reserved for Trial

 

 

 

Sex of Appellant                                M = Man                           W = Woman

 

 

 

                                   

 

Grounds                        (W) = Win            C = Custody             M = Mobility            CS = Child Support

of Appeal

 or Cross                        (L) = Lose            A = Access                O = Other                  SS = Spousal Support

  Appeal

                                                       EQ = Equalization

 

 

 

Panel Judge 1 or 2           Alb = Abella JA                   Fld = Feldman JA               Char = Charron JA

 

                                          Sim = Simmons JA              Wlr = Weiler JA                   Lng = Lang JA

 

                                                McM = McMurtry  former CJO            OCnr = O’Connor DCJO

 

                                         Gdge = Goudge JA               Arm = Arstrong JA                Brn = Borin JA

 

                                  Mcfd = Macfarland JA         Macp = Macphearson JA        Gil = Gillese JA

 

                                   Crnk = Cronk JA                  Catz = Catzman JA              Mold = Moldaver JA

 

                                   Lbse = Labrosse JA               Shrp = Sharp JA                 Rsbg = Rosenberg JA

 

                                          Lask = Laskin JA                    Blr = Blair JA                       Jur = Juriansz JA

 

                                          Roul = Rouleau JA                Kvr = Kriever JA                  Osb = Osbourne JA

 

                                  Mord = Morden JA                 Ast = Austin JA                    Crty = Carthy JA

 

 

Appendix A2 — Cases Examined for Justice Feldman

 

 

 

Sex of Lawyer ( wining / losing)

Cost Penalty (sex of wining appellant)

 

 

Sex.  of appellant

 Grounds of Appeal             .    ( Win/Lose )

Cross. Appeal.  (Win / Lose )

Panel Judge   .  1

Panel Judge .  2

 

 

 

F v m

(w)

1998

Bezanson v Falle (December 23)

W

 (W) CS O

 

Krv

Mck

F v m (m)

nc

1999

Gerstner v Borg (February 10)

M

 (W) O

 

Shrp

Ast

Sr v m (m)

nc

1999

Lee v. Lee (August 5, 1999)

M

 (L) CS

 

Char

Ocnr

F v m

(w)

1999

Swanson v Swanson (February 16)

M

 (W) O

 

Krvr

Mckn

M v f

(w) 4000

1999

Shortman v Shortman (Aug 6)

M

(L) SS EQ O

 

Char

Ocnr

M v f

def

1999

Murphy v Murphy (January 29)

M

(W) EQ

 

Mold

Shrp

 

(w) 2000

1999

Otterbein v Otterbein (Aug 6)

W

(W) SS

 

Char

Ocnr

 M v m

(w) 2000 c

1999

Kardish v Kardish (Mar 1 1999)

W

(W) O

 

Char

Lbse

F v m

(w)

1999

Pollastro v Pollastro (February 25)

W

(W) C

 

Abl

Catz

M v m

(w)

2000

Yackobeck v Hartwig (Aug 17)

M

(L) SS, EQ

 

McM

Brn

F v m

(w) 6000

2000

Leavoy v Leavoy (September 13)

M

(L) O

 

Lask

Ggde

F v m (m)

nc

2001

Cole v Kew (Mar 6)

M

 (L) C

 (L) EQ

Sim

Crty

M v f

(m)

2001

Katsigiannis v Kottick Katsigiannis (April 3)

W

 (L) C

 

Lask

Osbn

F v m (m)

nc

2001

Maurici v Maurici (February 20)

W

 (W) SS    (L) EQ

 (L) SS

Brn

Fnly

M v m

(w)

2001

Scheel v Henkleman (January 16)

W

 (W) SS

 

McM

Brn

M v m

(w)

2001

Stone v Stone (August 10)

M

(L) EQ, O

 

Catz

Shrp

M v m

nc

2001

Wreggitt v Belanger (December 10)

M

 (W) A    (L) C

 

Lask

Sim

F v m

(w)

2001

Scanlon v Standish (Oct 12)

M

(L) EQ

 

Shrp

Rsbg

M v m

(w)

2001

Difrancesco v Coutu (September 4)

W

(W) CS

 

Lask

Sim

M v m

(m)

2001

Wamsley v Wamsley (February 14)

M

(W) EQ

 

Char

Mord

M v m

(w)

2002

Brown v Brown (February 27 )

M

 (W) O   (L) C, A, CS, SS, EQ

(W) CS

Rsbg

Gil

M v f

(w) 20000

2002

Johnson v Cleroux (February 25)

W

 (W) M, O

(L) C

Rsbg

Gil

F v sr

nc

2002

Turner v Viau (April 8 2002)

W

 (L) O

 

Sim

Macp

F v m

(w)

2002

Wright v Zavier (March 26)

M

 (L) CS

 

Char, Sim

Shrp, Crty

M v m

(w) 2500 c

2002

Collier v Tobar (June 19 )

M

(L) EQ

 

Rsbg

Crnk

M v m

(m) 4000

2002

Wright v Wright (February 28)

W

(L) O

 

Feld

Shrp

M v f

(w) 10000

2003

Sydor v Sydor (October 2)

W

 (W) EQ

 

Crnk

Arm

F v m

(m) 5000

2003

Ruster v Ruster (September 11)

W

(L) EQ

 

Lask

Arm

M v f

(w) 3000

2003

Durocher v Lauzon (July 7)

M

(W) SS   (L) A, O

 

Catz

Gil

M v sr

nc

2003

Palmer v Palmer (November 12)

W

(W) SS

 

Gil

Arm

M v m

(w) 6250

2004

Arella v Scobak (July 15)

W

 (W) SS

 

McM

Brn

M v f

(w) 9000

2004

Kelly v Kelly (May 7)

W

 (W) SS, EQ

 

Lask

Drty

 

 

2004

Koutowska Woof v Woof (August 4)

M

 (L) C

 

Wlr

 

F v f

nc

2004

Mancini v Mancini (February 2)

W

 (W) O

 

Crnk

Macp

F v M

(w) 10000

2004

Roscoe v Roscoe (July 9)

M

 (L) C, A, CS

 

McM

Brn

F v m (m)

nc

2004

Walsh v Walsh (February 2)

M

 (W) SS

 

Lask

Gdge

F v f

(w) 4500

2005

Bremer v Bremer (February 21)

M

 (W) SS O   (L) SS, EQ

 

Sim

Gil

M v sr

nc

2005

Sharpe v Waterhouse (February 11)

 W

 (W) CS

 

Sim

Gil

F v m

(w)

2005

Tierney – Hynes v Hynes (June 28)

W

 (W)  SS

 

Gdge, Brn

Lng, Juri

M v m

(w) 10000

2005

McGouran v Connelly (September 9)

M

(L) CS

(W)CS

Gdge

McFd

M v m

(m) 8000

2005

Zomparelli v Zomparwlli (January 31)

W

(L) CS, O

 

Sim

Gil

 

(w) 8500

2005

Vaccaro v Vaccaro (February 18)

M

(L) EQ

 

Crnk

Lafm

F v m

(m) 7500

2006

Bodnar v Blackman (June 14)

M

(W) CS

 

Lask

Gil

M v sr

(w) 1000

2006

Sasseville v Sasseville ( Apr4)

W

(W) SS

 

Gdge

Rsbg

F v sr

(w) 5567

2006

Cianciusi v Cianciusi ( May 18)

M

(W) A    (L)

 

Lbse

Mold

F v m (m)

nc

2006

Schnarr v Schnarr (January 9)

W

(W) O

 

Lng

Lafm

M v sr

(w) 5000

2006

Stancheff v Stancheff (January 11)

M

(L) O

 

Lng

Lsfm

M v sr

(w) 4500

2006

Pirner v Pirner (January 12)

M

(L) C

 

Sim

Lafm

M v m

(w) 8000

2007

Fendelet v Dohey (June 21)

M

(L) CS, SS

 

Gil

Mcfd

F v m

(w) 6000

2007

Loit v Gove (May 8)

M

(L) SS, O

 

Weil

Lafm

M v m

(w) 5000

2006

Ng v Yam (April 6)

M

(L) O

 

Gdge

Rsbg

F v m (m)

nc

2007

Okmyansky v Okmyansky (March 16)

M

(W) SS     (L) O

 

Sim

Shrp

F v m

(m) 5000

2007

Weinrib v Bake (January 25)

W

(L) O

 

Ocnr

Roul