OTTAWA MEN'S CENTRE

LEGAL RESOURCES

ONTARIO COURT  OF APPEAL JUDGES

The Honourable Justice Roy McMurty

Bias by Justice Roy McMurty in the Ontario Court of Appeal

 Judicial Bias at the Court of Appeal

by Justice Roy McMurty

2007

By Peter Karl Roscoe

Apr 2006, Revised Sept 2007

For Justice McMurtry 38 family cases were available, and 37 of them had data on cost penalties. The cases and their outcomes can be found in Appendix A7 A summary of the decisions is as follows

 

Appellant

Custody

 Access

 Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

Number of Males

     4

     5

     2

      8

      5

          7

    18

     37

Number of Male Wins

     0

     1

     1

      2

      2

          2

     7

      6

 

Appellant

Custody

 Access

Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

Number of Females

     1

     0

     1

      8

      0

          4

     7

     37

Number of Female Wins

     0

     0

     1

      4

      0

          1

     4

     22

 

Summarized in percentage terms

  

Appellant

Custody

 Access

Mobility

 Spousal

 Support

  Child

 Support

Equalization

Other

Costs

% Chance of Male Win

     0.0

   20.0

     50.0

    20.0

    40.0

       28.5

  38.9

   16.2

% Chance of Female Win

  100.0

    NA

   100.0

    50.0

     NA

       25.0

  57.2

   59.5

  

It can be concluded that on a family issue a woman has a (33/58 x 100) 56.9 % chance of winning, and a man has a (21/86 x 100) 24.4 % % chance of winning when appearing before a panel with Justice McMurtry on it. Success as decided by cost penalties assigned was 16.2 % in favor of men, 59.5 % in favor of females and divided 16.5 % of the time.

 

 

Appendix A

 

Legend

 

 

Sex of Lawyer                     M = Male                       F = Female                 Sr = Self Represented

                                                     (m) = Hired by the Man             (f) = Hired by the woman

 

 Cost Penalty              (w) Woman Wins         (m) = Man Wins         nc = No Costs  

                            

                                                           res = Reserved for Trial

 

 

Sex of Appellant                                M = Man                           W = Woman

                                 

 

Grounds                        (W) = Win            C = Custody             M = Mobility            CS = Child Support

of Appeal

 or Cross                        (L) = Lose            A = Access                O = Other                  SS = Spousal Support

  Appeal

                                                       EQ = Equalization

 

 Panel Judge 1 or 2           Alb = Abella JA                   Fld = Feldman JA               Char = Charron JA

 

                                          Sim = Simmons JA              Wlr = Weiler JA                   Lng = Lang JA

 

                                                McM = McMurtry  former CJO            OCnr = O’Connor DCJO

 

                                         Gdge = Goudge JA               Arm = Arstrong JA                Brn = Borin JA

 

                                  Mcfd = Macfarland JA         Macp = Macphearson JA        Gil = Gillese JA

 

                                   Crnk = Cronk JA                  Catz = Catzman JA              Mold = Moldaver JA

 

                                   Lbse = Labrosse JA               Shrp = Sharp JA                 Rsbg = Rosenberg JA

 

                                          Lask = Laskin JA                    Blr = Blair JA                       Jur = Juriansz JA

 

                                          Roul = Rouleau JA                Kvr = Kriever JA                  Osb = Osbourne JA

 

                                  Mord = Morden JA                 Ast = Austin JA                    Crty = Carthy JA

 

 

 

Appendix A7 — Cases Examined for Justice McMurtry

 

  

Sex of Lawyer ( wining / losing)

Cost Penalty (sex of wining appellant)

 

 

Sex.  of appellant

 Grounds of Appeal             .    ( Win/Lose )

Cross. Appeal.  (Win / Lose )

Panel Judge   .  1

Panel Judge .  2

 

 

F v m

(w) 6200

2003

Ballentine v Ballentine (June 27)

   M

 (L) SS, O

 

Wlr

Mcph

M v m

nc

1996

Balogh v Balogh (November 20)

   M

 (W) SS,EQ, O  (L) SS

 

Catz

Osbn

 

(w)

1999

Babij v Babij (March 19)

   W

 (W) SS, EQ, O

 

Wlr

Gdge

F v sr

nc

2003

Cada v Cada (October 9)

   M

 (L) O

 

Sim

Gdge

M v m

(w) 3000

2005

Cotter v Wasmund (May 13)

   M

 (L) C

 

Drty

Lafm

F v m (w)

nc

2005

Grifth v Bootsma (September 20)

   M

(W) A, CS, O   (L) C

 

Sim

Catz

M v m

nc

1996

Huisman v Huisman (June 14)

   M

 (W) SS,EQ

 

Wlr

Catz

F v m

(w) 10000

2005

Krisko v Krisko (September 23)

   M

 (L) A

 

Sim

Catz

M v m

(m) 7500

2002

Latcham v Latcham (May 29)

   W

 (L) O

 

Lask

Char

F v m

(w)

2001

Manis v Manis (September 18)

   M

 (L) O

 

Alb

Mcph

M v m

(w)

2001

Miglin v. Miglin (April 26)

   M

 (L) A, SS

(W) SS

Alb

Mold

F v m

nc

2002

Parks v. Barnes (March 7)

   W

 (W) C

 

Char

Gdge

M v m

nc

2005

Pirner v Pirnir (January 6)

   M

 (L) CS

(L) SS

Lask

McM

M v f

(m)

1997

Roach v Roach (December 12)

   W

 (L) EQ, O

 

Lask

Rsbg

F v sr

(w) 10000

2004

Roscoe v Roscoe (July 9)

   M

 (L) C, A, CS, EQ, O

 

Fld

Brn

M v m

(w) 12000

2002

Sodhi v. Sodhi (June 19)

   M

 (L) CS, SS

(W) M

Char

Mold

F v m

(m) 5000

2003

Sabourin v Young (June 10) 

   M

 (W) M

 

Lask

OCnr

M v m

(w)

2001

Scheel v Henkleman (January 16)

   W

 (W) SS

 

Feld

Brn

M v m

(w) 4500

2002

Scherer v Scherer (February 18)

   W

 (W) O

 

Char

Catz

M v m

(m)

1999

Sefton v Brasg (September 11) 

   M

 (W) CS

 

Mcky

Rob

 

 

2002

Slieman v Slieman (May 14)

   M

 (W) O

 

 

 

M v m

(w) 22500

2002

Taylor v Taylor (July 8) 

   M

 (W) O

(W) CS

Catz

Mcph

 

(m) 8000

2005

Zomparelli v Zomparelli (May 12)

   W

 (L) SS, O

 

Drty

Lafm

F v m

nc

1998

Wood v Robertson (November 9)

   W

(W) O     (L) EQ

(L) O

Alb

OCnr

M v m

(w)

2000

Yackobeck v Hartwig (Aug 17)

   M

(L) SS, EQ

 

Feld

Brn

M v m

(w) 6250

2004

Arella v Scobak (July 15)

   W

 (W) SS

 

Feld

Brn

M v m

(w) 6411

2002

Ball v Ball (May 7 )

   M

(L) O

 

Lask

Char

M v m

(w) 1000

2001

Hagen v Hagen (February 5)

   M

(L) O

 

Char

Osbn

M v m

(w) 12000

2003

Noble v Noble(April 2)

   M

(P) O

 

Drty

Gil

M v m

(m) 1500

2006

Demarco v Demarco (December 14)

   M

(W) O

 

Arm

Gil

M v m

(w) 5000

2007

Hanna v Hanna (October 7)

   W

(W) O

 

Arm

Mcph

F v m

(w)

1998

McCallum v McCallum (March 23)

   M

(W) O

 

Catz

Mold

F v m

(w) 4000

2004

Evans v Evans (June 18)

   M

(L) O

 

Gil

Blr

F v m

(w) 1000

2006

Beeching v Beeching (December 12)

   M

(L) M

 

Gil

Arm

M v m

(w)

1996

La Russo v La Russo (October 18)

   M

(L) M

 

Catz

Osbn

F (m) v Sr

nc

2006

Cole v Danylkiw (May 18)

   M

(W) O     (L) C, A

 

Blr

Rsbg

M v m

(m) 11000

2000

Baldwin v Funston (May 3)

   W

(L) SS

 

Jur

Roul

M v m

(m)

1997

Van Bork v Van Bork (June 27)

   M

(W) EQ   (L) SS, O

 

Gdge

Crty

M v m

nc

1997

Crawford v Crawford

   W

(L) SS, EQ

 

Lask

Rsbg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

www.OttawaMensCentre.com

613-797-3237