A Time to Come Home
Some Parents Quit Working to Be Around More -- When Their Kids Are Teens,
Not Toddlers. That May Be Good Timing, Experts Say
By Lynn Crawford Cook
Special to The Washington Post
Tuesday, October 12, 2004; Page HE01
Architect and stay-at-home dad Scott Davis, center, jams
with son Jacob and daughter Lisa under the eaves of their house. (Susan
Biddle-the Washington Post)
When Pat Kloehn, 49, a Silver Spring mother of two, quit a job she enjoyed at
CNN to stay at home with her children, the lifestyle change had a certain
familiarity. It was the second time Kloehn had stepped off the career path to
become an at-home mom.
Kloehn, whose children are 13 and 17, says, "The first time, I did it
because I felt I wasn't having any quality time with my daughter. I didn't
spend enough time with her to even know her likes and dislikes. I wanted to
have another child, but I wanted to be the one to raise them, not a virtual
stranger."
Architect and stay-at-home dad Scott Davis, center, jams
with son Jacob and daughter Lisa under the eaves of their house. (Susan
Biddle-the Washington Post)
After several contented years at home, Kloehn returned to work when the kids
reached school age. But a year ago, she decided it was time to come home again.
"With two wars, September 11, a sniper and a hurricane, my husband [also a
CNN employee] and I were working 24-7," Kloehn says. "My son came home
to an empty house every day."
Though it is generally regarded as acceptable to leave children home alone at
age 12, Kloehn's son felt lost. "He was lonesome all the time," Kloehn
said. "When he talks about that period of his life, he calls it, the 'deep
blue' days."
"With teenage children, missing out on quality time seemed much
scarier" than when they were younger, Kloehn said. "Without direction,
I felt my kids were at risk for some really dangerous behaviors that could
affect their adult lives."
Takoma Park mom Diane Mac-Eachern, 52, worked when her children were young,
building a 35-employee communications and advocacy firm. After 14 years, she
said, she was drained from the constant demands on her time and feeling that she
was never giving her best to her clients, her employees or her family. Three
years ago, MacEachern sold her share of the business and is now an at-home mom
to her children, ages 14 and 16.
"I think that the middle school and high school years are much more
challenging for a child than preschool or elementary school," she said.
"And it's harder for parents to stay in touch with their children during
the teenage years. As I looked at the challenges, I really felt like this was
the time to be there for them."
Kloehn and MacEachern have discovered what many parents of older children
(including Bush campaign adviser Karen Hughes and Judith Steinberg Dean, wife of
former Vermont governor and presidential candidate Howard Dean) have found: that
being available for their children when they are older may be just as important
as when they are very young.
According to the U.S. Census, workforce participation by mothers fell from a
record high of 59 percent in 1998 to 55 percent in 2000. This was the first
significant decline since the Census Bureau began monitoring such data in 1976.
The figure remained unchanged in 2002. The four-percentage-point decline was
mostly attributable to women with infants, but it also included moms who dropped
out of the workforce when their kids were older.
Numerous studies have shown that the hours between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. are when
kids are most likely to use drugs, engage in sex and get caught up in violence.
The Partnership for a Drug-Free America encourages parents to monitor their
children's activities during these hours, because "the rewards of
monitoring are proven. Kids who are not regularly monitored are four times more
likely to use drugs."
The federally funded National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health found that
parental involvement helped protect teens against almost every risky behavior.
According to Neil Bernstein, a clinical psychologist in the District and
author of "How to Keep Your Teenagers Out of Trouble: And What to Do If You
Don't" (Workman Publishing, 2001), a close relationship between parent and
child results in more well-adjusted children.
"Increased parental involvement early in adolescence pays great dividends
later on," he said. "If we have not succeeded in instilling values of
independence, trustworthiness and responsibility in early adolescence, we're
going to pay dearly later on when they will resent our intrusion into their
lives."
Second Wave of
Development
Early adolescence is not unlike early childhood in terms of learning new skills,
separating from parents and becoming an independent person, according to Jay
Giedd, chief of brain development at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
Teenagers are going through a "second wave" of rapid brain development
that rivals the toddler years in terms of sheer activity, Giedd said. But this
time, the brain isn't producing as many new connections as it is getting rid of
unused ones.
"Teenagers have way more [brain] connections than they can possibly
use," said Giedd, so they have to "prune" these connections as
one would trim a bush that becomes overgrown. "The connections that are
used will flourish. The ones that aren't used will wither and die."
The pruning takes place through modeling -- observing the behavior of successful
people and trying it out. "By being around, [parents] are modeling the
behaviors that we want teenagers to imitate," said Giedd. And perhaps more
importantly, "Having parents around gives kids a sense of well-being. It
sends a message that 'you are important to me.' "
Parents of teenagers have a unique opportunity to help their children develop
lifelong emotional health, according to Giedd.
"What happens to teens during this time leaves lasting patterns of thinking
and behavior. Teens actually want their parents to be involved in their
lives," said Giedd, "but they resist it. And they're supposed to. It's
their job to separate from their parents. But parents should realize that
they've got to hang in there. If you're there to share those day-to-day moments,
then more [positive] things will happen."
Having more parental involvement also helps teens avoid an increasingly
common phenomenon -- major depressive disorders and suicide. According to NIMH
child psychiatrist Daniel Pine, the rates of depression in adolescents are
"clearly established at over 10 to 15 percent." And for children who
suffer from depression, the risk of committing suicide increases dramatically.
What's more, according to an NIMH report on adolescent depression, there is some
evidence that experiencing depression in adolescence leaves "scars"
that may increase teens' vulnerability to depression throughout their early
life. The report cautions, "Low levels of communication between parents and
children may act as a significant risk factor for adolescent depression."
Reordering
Priorities
Acknowledging that most parents can't afford to just quit their jobs and stay at
home with their kids, psychologist Bernstein said, "Having working parents
isn't necessarily bad for kids. If your kids are happy, if they're well-adjusted
socially, if they're doing well in school, then it's working.
"But if you feel your kids need more of your time, and you're staying in a
job just so you can pay your six-thousand-dollar-a-month mortgage, then I'd say
people need to reorder their priorities."
Priorities are what it came down to for Scott Davis. When Davis, 52, left his
job at a prominent architecture firm, the father of four decided he'd had enough
of putting in 60-plus hours per week away from home. Despite the calls from
headhunters and the lure of a six-figure income, Davis decided to become the
general contractor of his home renovation -- and to be more available for his
kids, who were ages 6 through 13.
Two years later, Davis and his wife, Kathleen Schalch, a reporter for National
Public Radio, look back ruefully on the years when they were both working full
time. There were, Schalch said, "so many moments ignored, so many chances
for interaction that didn't take place."
One of Davis's children requires especially close attention to calibrate his
medication and to monitor his behavioral issues. Another child was in trouble
with math. Davis was able to work with him after school, analyze what was going
wrong and enable him to get a 97 percent grade on a final exam. "You can't
buy that for any price. No babysitter, no teacher, no other person has the
commitment that you have to your child," Davis said.
Many parents, said Bernstein, try to compensate for not being around by
over-scheduling their kids in sports, lessons and other activities. "Some
kids can handle it, but some are neurotic messes," he said.
According to Bernstein, teenagers often make veiled pleas for help by acting out
or getting into some kind of trouble, when what they really need is more and
better communication with their parents.
"Keeping the communication channels open is arguably the most important
thing parents can do to help their children," said Bernstein. It's
difficult when both parents are working, he admits. "Look for the
propitious moment to communicate," he recommends, "like at dinner,
while riding in the car or while having a snack late at night."
Said Davis, "If you want to have a serious discussion with a teenager,
you can't just sit them down and say, 'Okay, we're going to have a rich
interaction now.' It has to bubble up spontaneously. You have to put in your
time and be there when it does." Financial issues aside, said Bernstein,
some people need to keep working to meet their own emotional, intellectual or
social needs.
"People have to look at their own psychological makeup," he said.
"It's hard to totally give up [working.] It would be even worse to quit,
and then to lay all this guilt upon the kid."
"You have to really do some soul-searching," Bernstein said.
"Search your heart. Be honest with yourself about how the child is doing
and how you're doing. It's not crystal-clear. I know parents who stay at home
and their kids are in all sorts of trouble. It's not a cure by itself."
And sometimes staying home is actually part of the problem.
"Parents who have an excessive need to control can convince themselves that
it is in the child's best interest to stay at home," Bernstein said,
"when in fact, having so much parental supervision just fuels the
teenager's rebellion."
As with everything else related to raising kids, the decision to stay at home
isn't clear-cut. But parents who have done it report that it is both enjoyable
and rewarding.
Being at home doesn't "eliminate all bad moods and short tempers,"
said at-home dad Davis. "But things overall are healthier and calmer."
MacEachern, the Takoma Park mom, agreed. "My children are happier people as
teenagers because I'm home more," she said. "There will always be time
for work when my kids are in college. Right now, we have time for each
other."•
Lynn Crawford Cook is a freelance writer in Silver Spring. This is her first
story for the Health section.
Source
www.OttawaMensCentre.com