Unlike the United States, Canada has little in the 
							way of a criminal gun culture. Consider: Thirty-five 
							thousand Canadians have purchased $5-million 
							liability insurance policies from the National 
							Firearms Association (NFA), which cover their 
							legitimate gun-related activities all over North 
							America. Their annual premium is just $7.95. Why so 
							cheap? Because, as NFA president Dave Tomlinson 
							dryly explained in an interview, his company 
							virtually never receives claims. Legal gun-owners 
							are unusually responsible people. If they weren't, 
							his company would be out of business.
But the 1989 
							Montreal Massacre of 14 women by Marc Lepine drove 
							rational attitudes to guns, perhaps forever, from 
							the collective Canadian psyche.
								Ironically, in spousal or partner killings of 
							Canadian women by men, guns are the culprit in only 
							about 25 cases per year -- this in a country of over 
							30 million people. Spurned men are far more likely 
							to kill themselves than their partners. Women are 
							six times as likely to be assaulted with other 
							weapons as with guns. Nevertheless, since the Lepine 
							massacre, guns have become synonymous with violence 
							against women, and gun control with protection for 
							women.
								Enter the Firearms Act, which had nothing to do 
							with general gun crime (at a low ebb when the Act 
							was introduced), or actual prevention of homicidal 
							intent, and everything to do with appeasing 
							feminists' irrational fear of a frightening -- but 
							statistically tiny --menace.
								The good guys who suffer the most are gun 
							collectors -- invariably men -- in the process of a 
							marital breakdown. For in its obsession with 
							protecting women, the Firearms Act now accords 
							spouses control over their husbands' right to renew 
							their licences (in principle, the control operates 
							bilaterally; but in reality, it almost invariably 
							comes down to women controlling men's renewals) and, 
							in many cases, the right to continued ownership of 
							their property.
								Jeremy Swanson is a poster boy for this 
							phenomenon. A knowledgeable South African-born 
							amateur war historian and ballistics expert, he 
							worked as a civil servant for the War Museum in 
							Ottawa, whose rigorous background checks he 
							successfully passed. (In 1997, he was named the 
							museum's top employee).