John Tory backpedals on creationism

From Thursday's Globe and Mail

THORNHILL, ONT. — Christian private schools should be allowed to teach creationism if they receive public funding, Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory said yesterday.

But six hours later, he went into damage-control mode, saying creationism should be explored only in religion class and not elsewhere in the curriculum, such as in science class.

"The Christian-based school would have to teach the Ontario curriculum," Mr. Tory told reporters in defending his plan to fund religious schools. "They teach evolution in the Ontario curriculum, but they also could teach the fact to the children that there are other theories that people have out there that are part of some Christian beliefs."

Mr. Tory, a member of the United Church, said that if he is elected premier on Oct. 10, private religious schools could opt in to the public system provided they are subject to provincial inspections. But they would still be allowed to teach their core beliefs.

His remarks quickly drew fire from the Liberal government.

Education Minister Kathleen Wynne, who is running against Mr. Tory in the Toronto riding of Don Valley West, accused him of not thinking through his campaign pledge.

"The reason that private schools exist is that they don't want to be part of the publicly funded system ... We allow that in Ontario. We allow that freedom," Ms. Wynne said in an interview.

"In terms of public dollars, those public dollars should go into a curriculum that has been agreed upon as being the one that is the best for our kids and is rooted in science and is rooted in evidence."

The creation-evolution debate has been a perennial theme in the U.S. education system, where Christian groups want creationism taught in the classroom over evolution. Creationists reject the Darwinian evolution theory, and believe that every word in the Book of Genesis is literally true.

Roman Catholic schools, who come under Ontario's public education umbrella, do explore creationism, but only in religion class. Evolution is taught elsewhere in the curriculum.

In clarifying his remarks yesterday, Mr. Tory said: "The Ontario curriculum teaches evolution and that is the curriculum that would have to be taught in the faith-based and all other schools that receive public funding. There are other theories that can be taught as part of religious instruction ... But the curriculum is the curriculum."

Mr. Tory has released few details of his plan to extend funding to private religious schools. He is leaving that up to a commission that won't meet until after the election.

Still, the issue has dominated the agenda even before the campaign officially kicks off Monday. Mr. Tory wants to extend taxpayer funding to all religious schools, not just Roman Catholic ones - a move Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said would threaten the stability of the public education system.

On the unofficial campaign trail yesterday, Mr. Tory lashed out at critics, saying this is not the time for fear mongering. He said that he envisions one school bus picking up children on a particular street and dropping them off to different schools.

"I also want to see a day when these kids from the faith-based schools are playing basketball with the kids in the public school," he said at the Kamin Education Centre, a private Jewish school.

"And I ask this question of people, do they think if it's a good thing for kids to play basketball with each other ... it's more likely to happen with these schools included in public education or outside the tent where they are today? I say it will happen if they are included as part of public education."

Annie Kidder, a spokeswoman for People for Education, said yesterday she was frustrated that the focus in this election campaign is on private schools entering the public system, and not on fixing public education.

"We're already now getting into the details about what will be taught in religious schools. We've put the cart very far ahead of the horse," she said.

"It's frustrating and it allows us to avoid much more important ... exploration that I really think we need right now in Ontario."

Source

Our commentary in the Globe and Mail

September 6, 2007

Its time for the Liberals to flip flop on a mandatory assumption of equal parenting after separation. The failure of the liberals to have such legislation means we have government promoted "parental alienation" and an unofficial policy of gender apartheid. The liberals will flip and flop because they fail to think outside their own narrow minded box. Its time for the Liberals to open their eyes and realize that half our population is male and that children have an equal right to equal time with a mother and a father. Just when are the Liberals going to realize that for every man who is a victim of Male Gender Apartheid that there is a little girl, a new wife and a mother all victimized because of crazy feminist influences that have corrupted Canada and has resulted in a negative population growth. Of course that’s such an incredibly big problem that the liberals can't see that either. http://www.OttawaMensCentre.com 613-797-3237

Posted 06/09/07 at 11:09 AM EDT