U.S. marks Sept. 11 with moment of silence

Reuters

NEW YORK — Americans observed a moment of silence at the very hour and place of the first Sept. 11 attack on Tuesday, the sixth anniversary of a day remembered with solemnity and ceremony.

Speaking near Ground Zero, where the twin World Trade Center towers were destroyed by hijacked planes on Sept. 11, 2001, Mayor Michael Bloomberg told families of those who died: "Six years have passed and our place is still by your side."

Rain fell on the sombre ceremony as some wore funereal black to remember the 2,750 people killed when the towers were destroyed one after the other. Their names were due to be read out loud over four hours.

Similar ceremonies were taking place in Washington, where the Pentagon was attacked by a third plane, and Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where a fourth plane crashed after passengers fought with al-Qaeda hijackers that day.

Bagpipes played, accompanied by a steady drum beat, in a New York city park neighbouring the former disaster site which is now a busy construction zone.

The first of four New York moments of silence — followed by the ringing of church bells — took place at 8:46 a.m. (1246 GMT), the hour the first plane struck. Other moments were set for when the second plane struck and when each tower fell.

Sept. 11 fell on a Tuesday again for the first time since 2001, yet another reminder of the day.

While Americans mourned, al Qaeda released another video on Tuesday, following one last week in which Osama bin Laden called on Americans to embrace Islam to avert war.

The new, 47-minute video featured only a still picture of bin Laden -- no moving video -- while he eulogizes one of the 19 hijackers, Waleed al-Shehri, as a rare and magnificent man.

The new video also shows Mr. Shehri delivering his last testament in which he chastises Americans and welcomes death.

The term 9/11 uses the American convention of enumerating the month before the date. In all, 2,993 people died, including the 19 hijackers.

"It's the kind of event that will not really fade emotionally until everyone who was alive at the time has died," said Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.

"It takes a while. It was really the 1960s before you could discuss Pearl Harbor rationally without using epithets for the Japanese," he said of Japan's attack on the U.S. base in Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941.

Nor can 9/11 be separated from politics, especially with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani running for president. He leads most of the national polls for the Republican nomination, largely on the strength of his performance that day.

Some groups representing the families of victims opposed giving Mr. Giuliani a speaking role in the commemoration, raising concerns he would use the platform to promote his presidential aspirations. But Giuliani will speak as planned, and his aides have insisted that he will not politicize the event.

New York television station WABC tried to deviate from the past by not broadcasting the reading of the names of the dead but backtracked in the face of stiff public opposition.

Mr. Bloomberg himself tried to move this year's commemoration entirely off site because Ground Zero is under construction. Families of the victims protested and Mr. Bloomberg relented, allowing them limited access.

"It inhibited political speech," said Doug Muzzio, public affairs professor at New York's Baruch College. "That's beginning to diminish but as long as there's a war on terror and there's a politics of terror, 9/11 is going to be a symbol of it.

"Without doubt it will persist through this election cycle," he said in a reference to the November 2008 presidential election.

Source

 

 

 

 

Our commentary in the Globe and Mail

September 11, 2007

  1. You (Ottawa Mens Centre.com, from Ottawa, Canada) wrote: Terrorists in Canada take a variety of forms. Spare a thought for the tens of thousands of Canadian children who never see their father's again after being the victim of a feminist lawyer and a judge indoctrinated with politically correct feminist idiology. If you are a male in family court, you will be "terrorized", you will "feel the hatred oozing out of the courtroom walls". Our courts are worried about security while they destroy the security of children, tens of thousands of Canadian children never get to see their father again as a result of a feminist lawyer and an insult to justice called a family court judge. No, not a majority but a hell of a lot of them. Its an epidemic of flagrant abuse, that can only called terror. For example, back in 2001 a lawyer Lesley Kendall from the Kingston Law firm Cunninham swan, knew a Sudbury judge found fraud, threw out an order that a father was a vexatious litigant and ordered an expedited trial of custody. Another judge Justice Guy Mahaffy, now the North East regional senior, issued 5 criminal charges of assault against the mother. Lesley Kendall then applied in Kingston Ontario for a restraining order against the father "to stop the litigation". Lesley Kendall then gave evidence while arguing the motion in front of "Justice Denis Power of Ottawa" who not only banished the father from "Kingston" but in addition, made the order "permanent", that is "for life", and hit the father with $6,500 in costs, which of course must be paid before any motion or trial can be heard before access can take place. You read correctly, a father was banished from Kinston, permanently by Justice Denis Power simply because he felt like flagrantly abusing his power. Thats what I call a judicial terrorist. If you think September 911 was terror, just go to Kingston family court and watch Lesley Kendall and the feminist judges leave their trail of destruction. www.OttawaMensCentre.com 6113-797-3237

    Source

 

 

  1. Chris H from To, Canada writes: Ottawa Mens: Although your cause might be righteous - the analogy you make here is simply audacious. Undoubtedly the drama and frustration of a family law trial can bring any one down, however; thousands of people died in the September 11th attacks. There are fathers who remember this day vividly because they will NEVER see their children again. Their families were not taken away by the family court - they were blown apart by terrorists. I am sure the fathers for whom you lobby thank you for your tireless work - but please have some respect and perspective and refrain from drawing this anaolgy.

    You Ottawa Mens Centre.com, from Ottawa, Canada wrote: Chris H The analogy is very appropriate. You probably are unaware that tens of thousands of Canadan fathers are terrorized in family court every year. You need to know that for many, they will NEVER see their children. There is NO CLOSURE, it is a never ending death. If your loved one is killed, you have a funeral, a memorial service. To be permanently prevented from ever seeing your own child, is a never ending death. You live in terror every day that a mentally ill violent women will kill your child while the courts give her anything and everything she needs to continue the terror permanently. For many fathers unjustly permanenlty alienatd from their children by lying feminist lawyers and feminist judges it would be a lot easier for them to move on with their lives and suffer less grief if their children were blown away in a 911. The reality is, to not see your child as a result of a feminist lawyer personally fabricating evidence to do illegal acts in court such as obstruction of justice is a lot harder than a tragic death. Its a living death. When the perpertrator of this terror is an officer of the court and or a judge, it makes the abuse worse because these are people entrusted by society to prevent such terror. If you want to see a lawyer personally fabricat evidence and then give that evidence what arguing for her client, just go down to Kingston Ontario family court and watch Lesly Kendall from the firm Cunningham Swan in action. If you want to understand terror, just go to family court and you will feel the hatred towards men oozing out of the court room walls. www.OttawaMensCentre.com 613-797-3237

     

    Source