About nine per cent of Canadians in a same-sex relationship had
children under 24 years old living in the home.
The census
also found:
• There were 6,105,910 married-couple families, an increase
of only 3.5 per cent from 2001, accounting for 68.8 per cent of
all census families.
• In contrast, the number of common-law-couple families
surged 18.9 per cent to 1,376,865, or 15.5 per cent of all
census families. Only two decades ago, that proportion stood at
7.2 per cent.
• The number of lone-parent families increased 7.8 per cent
to 1,414,060.
• The number of one-person households increased 11.8 per
cent, more than twice as fast as the 5.3 per cent increase for
the total population in private households.
• The number of households consisting of couples without
children aged 24 years and under increased 11.2 per cent from
2001.
“The overall picture certainly is one of an increasing
diversification of our families and households,” said Doug
Norris, senior-vice president and chief demographer at
Environics Analytics.
“For the first time ever, we've got more couples without
children than with children, we've got over a quarter of our
households with one person only,” he said.
Although the increase in same-sex couples is significant, it
was not unexpected.
Under-reporting is common on first-time census questions: The
number of same-sex couples identified by the Australian census
doubled from 1996 to 2001; the United States saw an increase of
300 per cent from 1990 to 2000.
Moreover, Canada has seen broad policy changes on same-sex
couple rights and entitlements since the last census.
Adoption, pension benefits, child-care tax breaks and a host
of other rights were awarded to gay and lesbian couples in the
late 1990s and early 2000s. Canada became the fourth country in
the world to legalize same-sex marriage in July, 2005, after
several provincial courts ruled that the government's definition
of marriage – the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of
all others – was unconstitutional.
Experts say these policy changes and greater societal
tolerance made it easier for same-sex couples to self identify
on the 2006 census.
“Two things are happening,” said David Rayside, director of
the Mark S. Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies at
University of Toronto.
“As public acceptance slowly increases for ... the
recognition of homosexuality in general, and for same-sex
couples in particular, there are more people in a broader range
of communities who can actually imagine living together,” he
said.
“But also, there is an increase in the proportion of people
who are prepared to say that they are living together in a
conjugal relationship.”
The census appears to skew low on the number of same-sex
marriages. According to Canadians for Equal Marriage, 12,438
marriage licences had been issued to same-sex couples by the end
of summer 2006, based on provincial data and estimates.
Some critics attribute the discrepancy to the way the census
question was asked. Couples were instructed to check the “Other”
category at the bottom of a list of relationships, rather than
the box marked “Husband or wife.”
“The census, we believe, made an error and they were unfair
to married same-sex couples,” said Helen Kennedy, executive
director of Egale Canada, a gay rights advocacy group that
organized a petition last year and urged couples to ignore the
“Other” box.
Mr. Norris of Environics said the “other” category could have
resulted in lower numbers, but that it's difficult to say
because the data are so new and there's no benchmark.
Michael Leshner, one of the first Canadians to legally marry
his same-sex partner, Michael Stark, in a June, 2003, civil
ceremony, said it will be many years before the census
accurately reflects the totality of gay and lesbian families.
“A lot of people do not feel comfortable, still, coming out
on official government sites for a variety of reasons,” Mr.
Leshner said. “Social change, even within the gay and lesbian
movement, takes a long, long time.”
Still, Mr. Stark said the early results are encouraging for
he and his husband, who spent many years fighting for the same
rights as heterosexual couples and who, only four years ago,
were among just a handful of married same-sex couples in the
entire country.
“There's a certain satisfaction knowing people are taking
advantage of that right to get married,” he said.
Meanwhile, the number of traditional nuclear families gave up
even more ground to lone-parent families, which make up a record
one in four Canadian families with children.
Evidence of the lone-parent phenomenon reaches back to the
early 20th century, but the reasons more and more Canadian
children are being raised by only one parent are drastically
different than they were 75 years ago.
Regardless of the cause, poverty is a common thread.
“The problem is that you have only one breadwinner, when that
breadwinner is employed at all,” said Anne-Marie Ambert,
professor emeritus of sociology at York University in Toronto.
In 2005, the median household income for two-parent families
in Canada was $67,600. For lone-parent families it was $30,000 —
meaning half of all single-parent families were bringing in less
that amount annually.
There were 1.4 million lone-parent families — 26 per cent of
all families with children — last year. That's up some eight per
cent from five years earlier. While the vast majority of such
households (80 per cent) were headed by women, the number of
lone-parent families headed by men was up 15 per cent.
More than 2.1 million children are now living in a
lone-parent family.
Mr. Norris said one census finding he found particularly
striking was that the number of women living with a spouse or
partner peaked in their late thirties, but didn't peak for men
until the late sixties. In other words, far more women in their
fifties and sixties are living single than are men.
“As a result of separations and divorce, women are not
forming unions again,” he said.
“When those relationships break up, women tend, for whatever
reason, not to get into a second relationship. They live on
their own, or perhaps as single parents, but they're not forming
a couple. They are not remarrying, not going into a common law
union to nearly the extent that males do, and that gap widens
with age.”
Canadian society since Trudeau has increasingly treating marriage as a bit of paper, its hip and cool to be gay, despite the fact that it takes a man a woman to create a child Canada’s parliament has failed to treat seriously, marriage between men and women, not a “same sex-union”.
Canada has a declining birthrate. Russia for example recognizes the seriousness of the problem and promotes childbirth and even competitions with prizes such as a new car for winners. In Canada, we have an unofficial policy of male gender apartheid. Men are treated as second class human beings when it comes to parenting.
Canada is failing to promote marriage and childbirth because for several generations, Canada has in effect being promoting marriage destruction. Canada needs, desperately needs a legal presumption of equal parenting after separation. Men are just too scared to have more children while our feminist judges treat women as scared cows and men as violent abusers.
www.OttawaMensCentre.com 613-797-3237
Source
www.OttawaMensCentre.com 613-797-3237
Source