don't for a moment believe the implicit
message out of the Conservative camp yesterday that,
from a Tory perspective, the NDP is now of equal concern
as the Liberals. As unthreatening as Stephane Dion has
looked on the campaign trail thus far, the Liberals
remain - outside of Quebec, at least - by far the
greatest threat to the Tories, if only because of what
remains of their brand.
That doesn't mean, though, that as promised the Tories
won't spend more time this week attacking the New
Democrats - or that it's not a smart strategic move.
While an NDP rise could cost the Tories a couple of
seats in B.C., and maybe even a seat or two in Atlantic
Canada, it would mostly do them a service by splitting
anti-Conservative votes in ridings where the Liberals
are competitive. If the Conservatives actually thought
that attacking the NDP would cost it many votes - most
of which would go to the Liberals - you can bet they'd
bite their tongues. In that case, we might even get
Stephen Harper lavishing praise on Jack Layton ("While I
disagree with the NDP leader, I admire his
principles...").
The thing is, refusing to attack the NDP actually
delegitimizes it as a serious opposition party - thus
prompting stridently anti-Conservative voters to choose
the Liberals over the New Democrats on election day for
fear of wasting their votes. Putting Layton front and
centre, on the other hand, might convince some
left-of-centre voters that he's no less a player than
Stephane Dion.
As an added bonus, it pushes along the narrative that
Dion is running such a pathetic campaign that the rest
of the opposition pack is catching up to him. That this
narrative isn't really borne out by the polls, which
moved only very slightly last week, is well beside the
point.
Ottawa Mens Centre.com,
from Ottawa, Canada) wrote: Jack Layton's
campaign does not auger well for the credibility of the
NDP. Take the foreign doctor mention, no real solution,
just a vague mention hoping that foreign "medical
professionals" , note he does not specify if thats a vet
family doctor or dentist. Then there is his feminist
attack on the military, thats what you call cowardly,
our troops are fighting a war and he calls them wife
beaters? Taliban Jack knows that he wont' get too many
votes out of the military, their families or their
extended community. He decided to insult this group by
trying to shore up support from his extreme feminist
lobby group that Jack used to be part of. That might
just explain why the NDP is so "anti-father", the
extreme feminist group don't believe in equal parenting
and their fundamental belief is that men are good for
being sperm donors and payors of child support. The NDP
have no comprehension that Canada's birth rate is
negative, negative as a result of a negative government
attitude towards the value of a Father in todays
society. Children need both parents, a legal presumption
of equal parenting after separartion will end 90% of
family court litigation and trillions of dollars for the
future of Canadian children and functional families
rather than the cess pool of corruption that stagnates
in our family courts. www.OttawaMensCentre.com
The more opposition, the merrier
Adam Radwanski, today at 9:20 AM EDT
don't for a moment believe the implicit message out of the Conservative camp yesterday that, from a Tory perspective, the NDP is now of equal concern as the Liberals. As unthreatening as Stephane Dion has looked on the campaign trail thus far, the Liberals remain - outside of Quebec, at least - by far the greatest threat to the Tories, if only because of what remains of their brand.
That doesn't mean, though, that as promised the Tories won't spend more time this week attacking the New Democrats - or that it's not a smart strategic move.
While an NDP rise could cost the Tories a couple of seats in B.C., and maybe even a seat or two in Atlantic Canada, it would mostly do them a service by splitting anti-Conservative votes in ridings where the Liberals are competitive. If the Conservatives actually thought that attacking the NDP would cost it many votes - most of which would go to the Liberals - you can bet they'd bite their tongues. In that case, we might even get Stephen Harper lavishing praise on Jack Layton ("While I disagree with the NDP leader, I admire his principles...").
The thing is, refusing to attack the NDP actually delegitimizes it as a serious opposition party - thus prompting stridently anti-Conservative voters to choose the Liberals over the New Democrats on election day for fear of wasting their votes. Putting Layton front and centre, on the other hand, might convince some left-of-centre voters that he's no less a player than Stephane Dion.
As an added bonus, it pushes along the narrative that Dion is running such a pathetic campaign that the rest of the opposition pack is catching up to him. That this narrative isn't really borne out by the polls, which moved only very slightly last week, is well beside the point.
Source
Ottawa Mens Centre.com, from Ottawa, Canada) wrote: Jack Layton's campaign does not auger well for the credibility of the NDP. Take the foreign doctor mention, no real solution, just a vague mention hoping that foreign "medical professionals" , note he does not specify if thats a vet family doctor or dentist. Then there is his feminist attack on the military, thats what you call cowardly, our troops are fighting a war and he calls them wife beaters? Taliban Jack knows that he wont' get too many votes out of the military, their families or their extended community. He decided to insult this group by trying to shore up support from his extreme feminist lobby group that Jack used to be part of. That might just explain why the NDP is so "anti-father", the extreme feminist group don't believe in equal parenting and their fundamental belief is that men are good for being sperm donors and payors of child support. The NDP have no comprehension that Canada's birth rate is negative, negative as a result of a negative government attitude towards the value of a Father in todays society. Children need both parents, a legal presumption of equal parenting after separartion will end 90% of family court litigation and trillions of dollars for the future of Canadian children and functional families rather than the cess pool of corruption that stagnates in our family courts. www.OttawaMensCentre.com