Airport security breaches persist, auditor warns
Employee given security pass despite being under criminal
investigation for murder and drug smuggling, Sheila Fraser finds
BILL CURRY
Globe and Mail Update
March 31, 2009 at 2:04 PM EDT
OTTAWA
— High-risk criminals remain able to obtain security clearances for jobs at
Canadian airports – including one individual who was under investigation for
murder in a drug smuggling scheme at a large airport, according to the
latest Auditor-General's report.
Released Tuesday, the report follows-up
on previous recommendations and Auditor-General Sheila Fraser finds several
gaps remain in Canada's efforts to protect national security.
The key gaps identified – that Canada must do a better job of screening
airport employees and of sharing information between agencies – comes more
than two decades after the Air India bombing, the largest terrorist attack
in Canadian history. The Auditor-General's 2004 report on national security
issues also called for improved screening of airport employees.
This year's follow-up report found Transport Canada and the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police are not sharing information that would help them
properly assess individuals applying for security clearance jobs at Canadian
airports.
“We highlight one case where a pass has been granted to an individual who had
assault and weapons convictions and was under investigation for a murder
relating to drug smuggling at a large airport,” the report states.
Ms. Fraser said in a press conference that she was not able to provide
further details on the incident.
Ms. Fraser's auditors reported that Transport Canada is holding back
information from the RCMP because of privacy concerns, while the RCMP holds back
information from Transport Canada because it fears the department will then pass
on that info to the individuals who are turned down for security clearance.
“As a result, Transport Canada may be granting clearance to high-risk
individuals for work in secure areas of Canada's airports. Progress on the
sharing of information for security screening of individuals working at airports
is thus unsatisfactory,” the report states.
Tuesday's joint report from Ms. Fraser and Environment Commissioner Scott
Vaughan examined how the government has responded to past recommendations in
seven areas. The response in two of the seven areas – Governor in Council
appointments and Canada Revenue audits – were deemed unsatisfactory. The
remaining five – national security, Indian and Northern Affairs efforts to
convert land into reserves, Passport Canada's response to rising demand,
guidelines for safe drinking water and the creation of an Air Quality Health
Index – all received satisfactory rankings.
The progress on national security was given a passing mark in spite of
numerous specific concerns raised in Tuesday's report.
In the chapter on national security, the Auditor-General also calls for more
oversight of the various agencies and departments who are collecting information
for national security reasons. The report notes that the federal government has
received several internal policy papers on this issue but is waiting to see the
recommendations of the public inquiry into the Air India bombing, which is
expected to be released shortly.
Gaps in information sharing between the RCMP, CSIS and Foreign Affairs on
national security were a common theme in the inquiry hearings and the report is
expected to recommend a new oversight regime for national security.
The report also notes that Justice Canada is preparing legislation that, if
approved and introduced by cabinet, would revise the mandates of several
security agencies to smooth any legal hurdles to information sharing.
The report notes that the seven main federal departments and agencies have
various levels of oversight – and some have none at all.
For instance, the department of National Defence “has created one of the
largest intelligence capabilities in the government” under the heading of Chief
of Defence Intelligence, yet there is no civilian oversight to ensure this
secret activity complies with Canadian law.
Source
Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre
The worst dangers to Canadian security, are not those
under suspicion of weapons offenses. They are not the worst childhood sex
abusers or Taliban sympathizers, the very worst most dangerous criminals in
Canada will NEVER be convicted, they get away with their offenses of the very
worst , most damaging forms of child abuse in the form of Draconian Family Court
Orders that deprive children of their right to have a father in their lives.
Ottawa has several examples of the 'worst of the worst' located at 161 Elgin
Street, Fifth Floor Judges Chambers, there you will find the Dishonourable
Corrupt Allan Sheffield, Denis Power and others who engage in what is politely
referred to as "flagrant abuse of judicial discretion".
The latest stats FROM the Ontario Superior Court, Family Division in Ottawa now
show equal numbers of "matters" settled by way of "Summary Judgment" as did go
to trial.
Summary Judgment is a civil procedure to be used in rare cases, now the courts,
using Sheffield and Power as Canada's Corrupt Hit Men of the Judiciary, to "get
rid of cases" and "get revenge" and or "to teach a lesson".
Canadians need to be warned, our society depends upon the rule of law, a
judiciary we can trust.
While we have corrupt, professional abusers who leave a trail of destroyed lives
Canada will continue to have a Justice System that is amongst the worst of the
third world.
The legal profession has known for nearly ten years that Power and Sheffield are
corrupt and despite that common knowledge and the very public screams of their
victims.
The Ontario Court of Appeal makes "sanitized decisions" to nail the lid on the
coffin of any of their victims while appearing at first to grant the appeals.
These appeals are rarely ever heard. They are prevented from being heard by more
chronic judicial bias and obvious hatred towards men.
The victims are also sisters, daughters, grandmothers, who, little girls never
grow up never to know.
www.OttawaMensCentre.com
Ottawa Mens Centre.com, from Ottawa Home of the Corrupt Judge Allan
Sheffield, Canada) wrote: The worst dangers to Canadian security, are
not those under suspicion of weapons offenses. They are not the worst childhood
sex abusers or Taliban sympathizers, the very worst most dangerous criminals in
Canada will NEVER be convicted, they get away with their offenses of the very
worst , most damaging forms of child abuse in the form of Draconian Family Court
Orders that deprive children of their right to have a father in their lives.
Ottawa has several examples of the 'worst of the worst' located at 161 Elgin
Street, Fifth Floor Judges Chambers, there you will find the Dishonourable
Corrupt Allan Sheffield, Denis Power and others who engage in what is politely
referred to as "flagrant abuse of judicial discretion".
The latest stats FROM the Ontario Superior Court, Family Division in Ottawa now
show equal numbers of "matters" settled by way of "Summary Judgment" as did go
to trial.
Summary Judgment is a civil procedure to be used in rare cases, now the courts,
using Sheffield and Power as Canada's Corrupt Hit Men of the Judiciary, to "get
rid of cases" and "get revenge" and or "to teach a lesson".
Canadians need to be warned, our society depends upon the rule of law, a
judiciary we can trust.
We can start with not just more security checks but psychological checks to weed
out the worst of the worst for their obvious personality disorders that make
some potential judges a danger to Canadian Security if appointed to the Ontario
Judiciary.
www.OttawaMensCentre.com
Canada's Security depends
first upon the Rule of Law. While we have corrupt judges who flagrantly abuse
their judicial power, they will continue to leave a trail of destroyed lives.
Canada's judiciary is plagued with judges who make Canada's Justice System
amongst the worst of the third world.
The legal profession has known for nearly ten years that Justice Denis Power and
Alan Sheffield are corrupt and despite that common knowledge and the very public
screams of their victims.
They are described by Ottawa Lawyers (very privately and in confidence) as the
"worst of the worst",
When their decisions very rarely reach appeal, the Ontario Court of Appeal makes
"sanitized decisions" to nail the lid on the coffin of any of their victims
while appearing at first to grant the appeals. These appeals are rarely ever
heard. They are prevented from being heard by more chronic judicial bias and
obvious hatred towards men.
Next time your baggage is being Xrayed, remember that there is NO psychological
screening of the judiciary, in fact several are very obviously known to be
suffering severe mental health and or personality problems. One well known judge
who is a very bitter divorced woman, is well known for her sometimes "crazy
decisions".
She also has no hesitation in exacting horrible revenge for anything that
offends her personal views that include a chronic hatred of men.
These underbelly of the Ontario Judiciary are perhaps the greatest danger to
Canadian security and Canada than any Taliban sympathizer.
www.OttawaMensCentre.com