The recent confiscation of a formerly legal firearm has raised
questions about how the RCMP inspects imported firearms and has forced a
change of national firearms policy.
The RCMP will be physically checking every assault-style rifle that
enters the country from now on.
Before the change, verifiers were used to check to make sure the guns are
what the exporter said they would be. Verifiers could be anyone with
knowledge of firearms and were given a one-day course from the RCMP.
Businesses that sell weapons were able to nominate their own verifiers.
But the discovery of a gun the RCMP says should never have made it into
Canada has highlighted potential problems with the verifier program.
There is concern that the first loyalty of business verifiers is to the
business and that this could hurt the accuracy of the verifications.
"We've identified an issue with [the program]," said Marty Cheliak, the
director general of the Canadian Firearms Program. "There's a perception of
a conflict of interest that may be prevalent. In this case, we're looking
into that for sure."
Cheliak was referring to the case of the Norinco Type 97A rifle.
Sixty of the Chinese-made guns were imported between December 2006 and
November 2007. They were initially classified as restricted, based on
information from the importer, photos, specifications from the manufacturer
and an inspection by a business-nominated verifier.
In October 2009, the Canada Border Services Agency alerted the RCMP to a
second shipment. This time the rifles were given a full physical inspection
by the RCMP, which determined the rifles should be prohibited.
"Why did they make a mistake?" asked Blair Hagen, president of the
National Firearms Association. "If the RCMP made the mistake in the first
place, that has some very serious ramifications."
In March, the RCMP sent letters to owners of the Norinco Type 97A rifles,
demanding they turn in the guns. This came after the RCMP decided the gun
was prohibited after determining it could be easily converted to fully
automatic fire.
"It was a purpose-built fully automatic firearm with the fully automatic
features disabled by [Norinco] which were not reported to us," Cheliak said.
"It is very easily converted back to automatic."
Automatic weapons, even those converted to semi-automatic fire, are
prohibited in Canada. Guns that can be easily converted to fully automatic
fire are also prohibited.
The firearms association believes the gun was illegally reclassified, and
some members plan to go to court to fight the seizures.
"The NFA is very concerned about the RCMP's unilateral reclassification
of this particular firearm and believes there should be a more transparent
process in place to explain it," Hagen said.
"Apparently, they've done a report on this. However, they've refused to
release that report. I think what's required here is some transparency.
"They should demonstrate that to the owners and to the firearms
community, so that everyone knows the truth and we can make a determination
if the classification was indeed legitimate."
Cheliak suggested the process is transparent enough.
"Why would we, the RCMP, or any police service give out information to
any group … on how to convert a firearm from semi-automatic to fully
automatic? That's ludicrous."
Hagen said owners are simply looking for proof. He does not believe that
if owners knew how to convert their weapons to fully automatic they would do
so.
That quest for proof will be part of the owners' fight in court, where
they are questioning the RCMP's ability to reclassify the weapons. Hagen
said his understanding of the law is that only the federal cabinet can
initiate a reclassification.
However, Cheliak said he doesn't believe the weapon has actually been
reclassified, but classified for the first time. A proper classification was
done with the physical inspection of the firearm.
Collection of the weapons began in early May. The RCMP say about half of
the rifles have been turned in. Those who turned over their weapons were
eligible for reimbursement from the Ministry of Public Safety, which is
rare.
Public Safety Minister Vic Toews issued a written statement supporting
the RCMP's efforts to retrieve the firearms and saying the authorization of
compensation "balances the need for public safety with the legitimate
expectations of firearms owners."
Hagen, of the National Firearms Association, says the RCMP have put the
Conservative government, a longtime supporter of the rights of gun owners,
in an awkward position.
For now, the owners don't feel the government has turned its back on
them.
"However, as this issue progresses, it is going to raise a lot of
questions with the minister and inside the government, and I think the
minister needs to be prepared for that."
The advocates for "easily convertible-automatic" weapons really want "machine
guns" that have no purpose other than killing people.
The sheer number of these disordered personalities is staggering as is the
conservatives willingness to trot out a few retired conservative cops as an
answer to the advice and recommendations of police Chiefs and criminologists
across Canada.
The RCMP obviously made a mistake first time round but that's one error for an a
very large amount of error free work that goes unreported.
The Conservative "get tough on criminals and not "law abiding firearm owners" is
hardly an objective comment. Criminals regularly treat "law abiding firearm
owners homes" like a candy store dispensing guns and ammunition to be used for
criminal use.
It does not really matter "how law abiding" a " gun owner is", his or her guns
are just killing weapons waiting for its date in destiny for a few seconds with
a bolt cutter or oxy torch.
Remember the massacres like Marc Levine and all the other mentally deranged
psychopaths who just needed a gun to murder large number of "law abiding
citizens".
www.OttawaMensCentre.com