5 things to know about 'Making a Murderer'
By Lisa
Respers France,
CNN
Thu January 7, 2016
Editor's Note:
We get it. You are bingeing on other shows, or -- the more popular excuse of
many who miss out on pop culture phenomena -- you're busy "reading books."
Whatever the reason you haven't gotten hooked on the addictive true crime
series a decade in the making, don't worry; we are here for you. Here are
five things to know about "Making a Murderer" so you can join in on the
conversation.
Steven Avery spent
18 years behind bars after being wrongfully convicted of sexual assault.
Avery, a native of Manitowoc, Wisconsin, was convicted of rape in 1985 and
imprisoned for 18 years.
He maintained his innocence, and family members gave him an alibi for
the time of the crime. The victim, Penny Beerntsen, identified him from
a photo lineup (with some assistance from authorities, the series says),
and a forensic examiner testified at the trial that a hair recovered
from her shirt was consistent with Avery's.
Years later, Avery was exonerated after DNA evidence linked a hair found
on the victim to Gregory Allen, a convicted felon who bore a resemblance
to Avery.
The Netflix series investigates how Avery's arrest came after other
run-ins with local authorities, which included his threatening a female
cousin who was married to an law enforcement officer.
Beerntsen
recently
told The Marshall Project that
she offered Avery an apology, to which he responded, "It's OK, Penny.
It's over."
"One of the things that really troubled me is that I was one of the only
people who apologized to Steve," she said. "It would have been nice if
the prosecutor and sheriff had said, 'Actually, we all got it wrong.' I
felt like I was the only one taking any responsibility."
Avery filed a
$36 million civil suit for wrongful incarceration; he was later arrested
and charged with murdering Teresa Halbach.
Avery was released in 2003 and filed suit against Manitowoc County for
wrongful conviction and imprisonment.
Two years later, he was arrested for the death of car photographer
Teresa Halbach, who had visited his family's auto salvage yard.
The prosecutors laid out their case: Halbach's Toyota RAV4 (which had
blood in it, including Avery's) was found on the Avery family's lot.
Tissue and bone fragments that matched Halbach's DNA profile
were
found outside Avery's mobile home. In
addition, Avery's then-16-year-old nephew, Brendan Dassey, confessed to
authorities that he had assisted his uncle in raping and killing her.
He settled the lawsuit for $400,000. Both men were sentenced to life in
prison and remain incarcerated.
Many viewers
believe that Avery and his nephew were railroaded.
Dassey recanted his confession, and Avery has insisted that he was
framed for the murder by authorities angry over his lawsuit. "Making a
Murderer" documents many of the elements of the case that have bothered
observers.
For example, Dassey, who has a low IQ, was questioned without his mother
present and appeared to be eager to tell sheriff's officers what they
wanted to hear. Some viewers believe that the sheriff's office planted
evidence to frame Avery for the crime.
Source
Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre
This is a must watch video for anyone interested in criminal law.
The Steven Avery Case is a classic example of how anything and everything can go
wrong
when an overzealous and blind prosecution convinces a court that garbage
evidence is
sufficient to qualify as beyond reasonable doubt.
The DNA evidence is a classic example of a lack of police training, and or
deliberate
errors by police in order to gain a conviction.
One of the most shocking examples is the "dna found under the hood" which infers
that
Steven Avery was a murderer when the DNA could have accidently or deliberately
or
accidently on purpose, could have been placed at that location to fabricate
evidence.
The facts are that in the USA, state authorities and or state funded
organizations are paid
bonuses for gaining criminal convictions by the use of DNA evidence.
Canada is not far behind but with just as strong motivations by police to
fabricate evidence.
Steven Avery was to the police public enemy Number one, an unpopular person
which
means that if he was in Ottawa Ontario, the Ottawa Police would have been
equally tempted
to fabricate evidence to gain a conviction or more likely, to Fabricate Evidence
NOT
to charge the real murderer because the real murderer was female or a person in
favour of the
police while Steven Avery was not.
If you do not wish to have the risk of having evidence fabricated against you,
Do not live or visit the City of Ottawa Ontario where Rotten Ottawa cops
fabricate evidence on a daily
basis and have "rubber stamp" judges of both levels of court to gain convictions
and or prevent appeals
of wrongful convictions.
The Superior Court of Ontario in Ottawa is riddled with corrupt fascist judges
who have a pathological
hatred of fathers and who have no conscience when it comes to putting in jail
and keeping in jail
innocent male victims of domestic violence.
Ottawa Mens Centre