Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Central East Ontario Judicial Region
Summary
Nov 2008
Central
Eastern Region Penalties and Cost
Penalties Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Ce – Central East Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of penalties to self
represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Boyko |
F |
Ce |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
|
5 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
|
25 |
11 |
|
17 |
5 |
|
|
3 |
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
|
9 |
3 |
|
6 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Lack |
F |
Ce |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
|
11 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
|
21 |
9 |
|
18 |
9 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
|
20 |
10 |
|
19 |
10 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
|
10 |
8 |
|
9 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Bryant |
M |
Ce |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
|
9 |
6 |
|
9 |
6 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
Graham |
M |
Ce |
|
2 |
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
|
18 |
3 |
|
14 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Ingram |
M |
Ce |
|
4 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Logan |
M |
Ce |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
|
10 |
2 |
|
8 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Mackinnon |
M |
Ce |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
|
7 |
1 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
McIssac |
M |
Ce |
|
5 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Misner |
M |
Ce |
|
4 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
|
5 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
|
32 |
4 |
|
23 |
4 |
|
|
5 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
Stong |
M |
Ce |
|
5 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
|
7 |
6 |
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
|
7 |
1 |
|
6 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Female Judges |
9 |
|
|
104 |
42 |
|
85 |
35 |
|
|
14 |
4 |
|
6 |
1 |
|
Male judges |
17 |
|
|
122 |
29 |
|
82 |
20 |
|
|
23 |
2 |
|
13 |
2 |
|
Total |
26 |
|
|
226 |
71 |
|
167 |
54 |
|
|
37 |
6 |
|
19 |
3 |
Central
East Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums missing
4
N = 13 Mean =
65.1 Total = 846.3
5.000 6.700 10.00 11.00 22.00 25.00 40.00 44.00 50.00 66.00 79.00 137.0 350.0
Male Imputed Income missing 9
N = 27 Mean =
75.5 Total = 2038.5
6.000 10.80 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 25.00 26.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 48.00 50.00 52.00 55.00 60.00 64.00 66.00 67.00 220.0 293.0 681.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 55 Mean =
21.5 Total = 1182.5
0.7000 1.000 1.400 2.000 2.100 2.500 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.000 4.300 4.500 4.500 4.700 4.700 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.500 6.000 6.000 7.000 7.000 7.300 9.000 10.00 10.00 10.20 10.50 11.00 12.00 12.50 12.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.50 15.70 16.00 16.20 16.60 21.30 24.40 28.70 40.00 42.00 44.00 45.00 45.90 64.00 87.90 91.60 320.0
Female Cost Penalties
N = 17 Mean =
9.1 Total = 154.7
0.3000 0.7000 0.7000 1.300 1.800 2.000 2.000 3.500 7.500 9.000 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 20.00 40.00
Central
East Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E
– eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
|
|
Ce |
L |
L |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.) |
|
Sa |
|
Though primary caregiver in past made by wife to undergo supervised access, custody and access settled prior to trial |
|
Boyko |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
24.4 |
Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial wife asks 100K gets 24.4 K |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Granted but award for damages denied, husband convicted of assault, daughter testifies, wife gets custody, |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
|
|
Griffin 2004 |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
50.0 |
Lump sum over 50 K given by transfer of home, $ 225 per month spousal support |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man imprisoned for assault not allowed back home, vesting order on house to wife |
|
Dunbar |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man sentenced to jail for contempt for failing to provide disclosure |
|
Dunbar |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
23 K held as security, security and 17 K more ordered to wife for spousal support arrears |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, Man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife mild |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Belcastro v.
Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, police visit to get personal items, wife gets custody, underemployed, mans stated income doubled by court |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
Intransient with alcohol problem for many years ordered to pay 43 K in arrears and imputed from 12 K claimed to 25 K, must pay $ 600 per month |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
|
|
Critch v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 16630 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Motion, 4 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks 58 K gets 40 K, man had a lawyer at trial |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mans properties including those transferred to others are frozen for 90 days so wife can make claims against them |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans payment is secured against his mortgage |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
350.0 |
Wife has exclusive possession for 36 months and man is ordered to pay 350 K mortgage due to fraudulent loan he forged wifes signature to get, criminal charges |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
1 K per month spousal support, 1.6 K per month child support and $ 50 per month s.7 expense, 4 K arrears, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ernyes v. Rachlin, 2004 CanLII 47867 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
Contempt motion, 4.5 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 305 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man with declared income of 46 K imputed to 66 K |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Supervised access, both spouses have other children, domestic violence history, impaired driving, urine testing and AA meetings ordered, inspection for alcohol by supervisor, must turn over car keys to supervisor install device on car ignition, supervision during visits relaxed, 2.4 K per month total support ordered |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr(ex) |
F |
Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr( ex) |
F |
Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
ex |
Leroux v. Walker, 2001 CanLII 28194 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Man owes 4.1 K arrears and must pay $ 125 per month |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
14.0 |
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
McNaughton v. Price, 2006 CanLII 1453 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
64.0 |
Man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.0 |
Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
Savage v. Agnello,
2002 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
16.0 |
Man claims 99 K and is imputed to 115 K |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2006 CanLII 22144 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Variation, 2.5 K costs |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Ward v. Bates,
2005 CanLII 2947 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
66.0 |
Lump sums of 48 K and 18 K forced by FRO to pay arrears, intentionally unemployed, imputed income 100 K must borrow to stay out of jail, variation denied |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
Dorion v. Merkley, 2006 CanLII 38357 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.2 |
Husband loses interim motion 5.2 K costs |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Goodfellow v. Goodfellow, 2005 CanLII 4847 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 60 K, variation refused |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
6 K costs for interim motions to vary support |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
293.0 |
Man claims 62 K income but is not varied and must continue paying at 355 K income. |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 24 K costs |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.1 |
Interim motion on access variation, 2.1 K costs |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
10 K to be held for security |
|
Lack |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Coscarella v. Coscarella, 2000 CanLII 20376 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.4 |
Interim motion, wife asks 2.6 K and gets 1.4 K, no costs for either side in divorce action |
|
Lack |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Laue v. Laue, 2000 CanLII 20295 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
60 K arrears, man clains a 2 K per year income, variation denied |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Berry v. Ollerenshaw, 2003 CanLII 2405 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Allegations of drug use and sexual abuse by non biological father, supervised access, leave to appeal granted |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
60.0 |
Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
22.0 |
22 K lump sum retroactive arrears |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 22 K equalization |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, 4 K per month support |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2005 CanLII 10541 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
42.0 |
Divorce trial, wife gets 42 K |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Denby v. Denby, 2003 CanLII 2097 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
28.7 |
Divorve action, 4 day trial, 28.7 K costs |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
MacPherson v.
MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
MacPherson v.
MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
11.0 |
Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Rilli v. Rilli, 2006 CanLII 34451 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
48.0 |
$ 1050 per month spousal support, man unemployed has 48 K income imputed to him, wife is unemployed and remarried to man who makes 14.4 K per year, wife has 9 K income imputed to her |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Tomasone v. Tomasone, 2005 CanLII 1074 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
5 K security for motion |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Aguilera v. Reid, 2006 CanLII 6196 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Assault charges, supervised access ordered, drugs, criminal record, final order for supervised access |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, 2005 CanLII 6048 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
26.0 |
Man claims income 35 K and is imputed to 61 K |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
Cook v. Burton, 2005 CanLII 1063 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order for 30 K against property and life insurance policy as security for support |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.7 |
0.7 K for interim motion |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
ex |
M |
Ho v. Ho, 2003
CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Preservation order already made against man, his pleadings struck, man does not answer, ex parte freezing order against mans family |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
F |
F |
Ierullo v. Ierullo, 2006 CanLII 33301 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
4 K costs of motion to vary and 5 K costs of appeal |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
35.0 |
Man unemployed and waiting for surgery imputed to 35 K per year |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man jailed for domestic assault, wife claims he’s a drug addict, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally umemployed |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
F |
F |
Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
64.0 |
Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
F |
F |
Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
11.0 |
Uncontested trial, husbands pleadings struck, 11 K costs |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Granted, the applicant has sworn to fear and 1 year order to let the respondents anger abates, 49 K equalization payment to go to FRO to secure support, arrears of retroactive support order varied, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 11K cost penalty |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Romanenko v.
Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Uncontested trial,49 K equalization payment to be held by FRO for security for support |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Abducts child, no charges, supervised access at wifes discretion, must give up passport to get access |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must give wife passport to get supervised access at her discretion |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
Interims motions to strike pleadings, 7 K costs |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck for failure to produce financial disclosure, uncontested trial ordered, 7 K costs |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
|
sr |
Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
44.0 |
Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, lump sum spousal support, 44 K in cost arrears, man violates non dissipation order |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
44.0 |
Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
L |
sr |
Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, man blames lawyer, uncontesed trial, 44 K owing in costs |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order not to seek information from others, 5 K recognizance in case of breach |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
f |
Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
5 K recognizance for restraining order, bad faith, income and value of business imputed |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2006 CanLII 20528 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
87.9 |
Divorce action, 84.9 K costs, and 3 K costs to apportion award. |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
52.0 |
Man claims he is unemployed and is imputed to 52 K |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
Harris v. Stuart Harris, 2005 CanLII 28789 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
40.0 |
Lump sum payment of 40 K for spousal support, equalization would of gone 10 K against the wife so she is given additional 10 K unjust enrichment award brining total lump to 50 K |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Hill v. Hill, 2002 CanLII 2790 (ON S.C |
mj |
Ip |
67.0 |
Mans declared income of 58 K imputed to 125 K |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
45.0 |
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
L |
137.0 |
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
ex |
sr |
Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
Lawson v. Lawson, 2006 CanLII 26573 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
66.0 |
Man quits job for farming and is imputed to 66 K, lowered to 60 K on appeal, 15 K costs of appeal |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
2 ˝ years supervised access changed to unsupervised 4 hours a week, completed parenting classes, mother objects, support increased |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Granted for wife and child, man convicted of domestic assault, mans application to extend time limits for equalization dismissed, claim for access dismissed, wifes application for spousal support allowed to proceed, mans assets frozen |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
F |
M |
Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody and mans access changed back to unsupervised |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
L |
6.7 |
6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Husbands answer struck |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck and can be reinstated on motion if he complies with 60 K payment and disclosure |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
ex |
M |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Wife gets ex parte orders freezing and seizing mans assets, man moved money out of country and abducted son, man gets supervised access, pleadings struck |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
F |
F |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 22662 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.5 |
Wifes loses motion for summary judgment, man pays 10.5 K costs |
|
Bryant |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Lee v. Lee, 2004
CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
|
Unspecified one time lump support them motion for interim spousal and child support of 1.1 K per month granted |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Lalonde v. Lalonde,
2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
21.0 |
Man on unemployment is intentionally unemployed, 21 K support arrears, imputed to 27 K per year |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.2 |
Default for not abiding by court order to sell home, pleadings struck, 10.2 K costs |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck for non compliance in sale of the family home, 10.2 K costs |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Martin-Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 17019 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.6 |
I0 K costs against husband for questioning at which wife refused to answer, husbands motion to vary support stayed and 6.6 K costs for motion |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
267.0 |
Default on child and spousal support Charging order on property and RRSP, 25K lump sum arrears no motion to vary until paid 500 K imputed income |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005
CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Man claims 3 year average 263 K income and is imputed to 530 K |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005
CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005
CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 9674 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
45.9 |
Motion to stay support and arrears and security, 45.9 K costs |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Kirby v. Chappell, 2003 CanLII 1990 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
9.0 |
Divorce action with trial, 9 K costs |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
Interim motion, wife claims 7.7 K and gets 5.5 K, husband claims 8.2 K |
|
Graham |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
A.N. v. M.A.Z., 2006 CanLII 12316 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man pays 1.8 K per month based on an imputed income |
|
Graham |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Desjardins v. Waters, 2006 CanLII 1203 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Child support default, minor reduction of arrears, separation agreement overturned, imputed income |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Man imprisoned and unemployed and imputed in arrears to Social services 38 K, varied to 11K |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Support variation, 15.K |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.7 |
Interim motion to vary support, 4.7 K costs |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Denied variation for support, costs, access changed, leave requirement |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Mills v. Mills, 2004 CanLII 4793 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Wife granted summary judgement, minor adjustment of minutes of settlement |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Murch v. Bell,
2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
6.0 |
Must claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Murch v. Bell, 2003
CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must put life insurance policy of 75 K in place designated to wife |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Mans income imputed 130 K per month, wife at 41 K per month, man pays 1.2 K per month total support, wife mild |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
91.6 |
Divorce action, 91.6 K costs |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 5 K prejudgment interest, 90 K in total costs |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
L |
F |
Sloan v. Sloan, 2006 CanLII 38366 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.5 |
Support variation denied, 12.5 costs, man is intentionally unemployed |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Stone v. Stone,
2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man in contempt for selling assets |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Stone v. Stone, 2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Can’t file an answer until he pays, contempt for selling assets when under non dissapation order |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Tavernier v. Tavernier, 2004 CanLII 5089 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K for motion |
|
Ingram |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dasilva v. Dasilva, 2004 CanLII 5043 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets restraining order and custody, 1.8 K per month total support |
|
Ingram |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult |
|
Ingram |
M |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult |
|
Ingram |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Raaymakers v. Green, 2004 CanLII 39 (ON S. |
mj |
L |
79.0 |
79 K lump for spousal support giving wife the house with no equalization, 1.2 K child support and 1.4 K spousal support continued, 10 K lump penalty for failing to disclose financial information |
|
Logan |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
J.H. v. S.H.,
2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Income imputed to father but not specified, 1 K spousal support, joint custody switched to sole custody to wife |
|
Logan |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
9K lump sum to secure 1 K spousal support, joint custody removed to wife sole custody, he has monthly deficeit, previous order to secure 150 K life insurance |
|
Logan |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Stancheff v.
Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must hold 200 K private insurance and designate wife and children beneficiary of work related policies and benefits and wife is trustee, |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
41.0 |
Mans imputed income increased from 58 K to 99 K |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order against man, joint custody |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Grant v. Grant, 2001 CanLII 28159 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 2 years prejudgment interest |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
sr |
|
R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic violence, impaired driving, drugs, jail, supervised access ordered, children want unsupervised, summary judgement denied and access set to trial |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Salzmann v. Salzmann,
2004 CanLII 5009 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
55.0 |
3.6 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support per month including s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 170 K per year income and is imputed to 225 K |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K costs of appeal added to costs of trial |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Warren v. Gilbert,
2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Man earns modest rental income that doesn’t cover his bills, imputed to 40 K |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Warren v. Gilbert,
2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Warren v. Gilbert,
2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K, constructive trust equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income |
|
Mackinnon |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Hyatt v. Whitney, 2002 CanLII 49537 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest on mans arrears |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody and exclusive possession of home, Wife gets 167 K equalization, imputed income |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dalgleish v.
Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Imputed to 75 K per year, 1.8 K per month support, vesting order on house, s.7 expenses |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dalgleish v.
Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
10 K interim lump payment for support, 175 vesting order on home with husbands share held in trust as security, 169 K equalization, domestic assault |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Vesting order securing 175 K child and spousal support proceeds to be held in trust, 169 K equalization, domestic assault |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Hatzidemetriou v. Hatzidemetriou, 2002 CanLII 2789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
3 K costs of interim motion, pleadings struck, 50 K arrears |
|
Magda |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Sokoljuk v. Sokoljuk, 2002 CanLII 2814 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Non dissipation order against man, wife gets support, man must pay into court funds held in foreign bank account, 5 K costs of motion |
|
McIsaac |
M |
Ce |
|
|
Martin 2004 |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck |
|
McIsaac |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
22.0 |
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
McIsaac |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing |
|
McIsaac |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing |
|
McIssac |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
FRO default, variation refused |
|
Misner |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Misner |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
|
Lump sum for retroactive support to be based on imputed income, equalization 351 K |
|
Misner |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25900 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest |
|
Misner |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Marchildon v. Irwin, 2004 CanLII 15738 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody, termination of access denied, man must pay $ 200 extra per month on arrears of support |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife has had exclusive possession for 2 ˝ years, order vesting the home to her, occupational rent denied but now she must pay the costs |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
K.(L.) v. G.(T.), 2006 CanLII 19333 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Wife makes various allegations of assault by child on father, allegations found unsubstanciated and access restored, mans contempt motion denied |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Shoval v. Shoval, 2005 CanLII 20817 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Wife allowed to move to Isreal with child makes allegations of sexual abuse, access suspended, supervised access in Isreal offered by mother, court allows order |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.0 |
Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order continued, freezing order extended to house |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
21.3 |
Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
sr |
Church v. Church,
2003 CanLII 1942 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy for security, complex separation agreement including 25 K security for costs for variation motion |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42934 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.0 |
Wife gets husbands answer struck, 16 K costs and 5 K costs of appeal |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Husband in violation of disclosure orders. pleadings struck, uncontested trial ordered, appeal denied |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
10.8 |
Man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 19156 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.2 |
Dividided success in application, husband pays 15K and 1.2 K for costs ruling |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
sr |
L |
Diciaula v. Mastrogiacomo, 2006 CanLII 11928 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck reinstated and then reinstatement overturned on appeal, impited income, supervised access, 12.5 K costs of appeal |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on support as mans pleadings were struck and he is denied participating |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 45568 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.0 |
Husbands pleadings struck, 12 K costs for motion |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Duguay v. Thompson-Duguay, 2000 CanLII 22515 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Separation agreement overturned due to mans default in paying support |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.5 |
Interims motions, wife claims 20 K gets 15.5 K |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
681.0 |
Man claims 139 K income and is imputed to 820 K on capital gains |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife awarded prejudgment interest on retroactive support award |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Haunert-Faga v. Faga, 2005 CanLII 39324 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
St |
|
Pleadings struck is overturned by Court of Appeal if man submits disclosure |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Ho v. Ho, 2003
CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Preservation order against mans assets but when wife has them seized they are already gone, mans pleadings struck |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife is given exclusive possession, non depletion order, mutual restraining order, $ 700 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support, joint custody, oldest child lives with father |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual allegations mutual non harassment order, son testifies mothers allegations aren’t true, joint custody with primary residence with wife, 1.8 K per month total support |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
sr |
Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
15 K security, 7 K costs of security motion |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
sr |
Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
15 K security, 7 K costs of security motion |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
S.(C.) v. S.(M.), 2007 CanLII 20279 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
320.0 |
Husband denied access to child must pay 320 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Sedore v. Sedore, 2006 CanLII 2622 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.3 |
Divorce action, 7.3 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Sh. É. C. v. G. P.,
2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
5.0 |
5 K lump on extraordinary child expenses, 12 K lump retroactive child support, charged on sale of house, domestic assault, hasn’t seen child in 1 ˝ years, permanent restraining order |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Sh. É. C. v. G. P.,
2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Domestic assault, wife given permanent restraining order, wife gets custody, man hasn’t seen his children in 1 ˝ years, 17 K lump sums, charging order on house |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic violence, wife given interim custody and man supervised access, supervised access for 2 ˝ years, to be expanded if child wishes, support arrears, security against family home |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
23 K remaining proceeds of home held for security for support, rest of his 114 K equity goes to wife for arrears, wife to be designated beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Visconti v. Visconti, 2006 CanLII 2626 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Wife gets 3 K on consent motion regarding setting husbands income |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
West v. West, 2001 CanLII 28216 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
220.0 |
Man claims 160 K income, originally imputed to 380 K, reimpured to 230 K |
|
Stong |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 44987 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.8 |
Motion for support, 12.8 K costs |
|
Stong |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Dunn v. Menear, 2003 CanLII 20236 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.3 |
Support variation, 4.3 K costs |
|
Stong |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Metter v. Solomon, 2005 CanLII 9673 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.7 |
Support variation, 15.7 K costs |
|
Strong |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
King v. Sutherland, 2005 CanLII 6377 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.7 |
Motion for support, 4.7 K costs |
|
Strong |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Munro v. Munro, 2004 CanLII 44992 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
2 K cost penalty seeking leave to appeaL 1.5 K cost penalty |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1668 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K for interim motion |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Arrears rescinded for time in jail, imputed income of 33 K to unemployed man, support secured against mans share of family home |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
33.0 |
Arrears rescinded for time in jail, imputed income of 33 K to unemployed man, support secured against mans share of family home |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Remainder of his procceds of sale of the home are to be held as security for child support |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Dvernichuk v. Larouche, 2003 CanLII 2107 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
Motion for access and custody, 4.5 K costs |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Mercieca v. Merciera, 2002 CanLII 2754 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife obtains an ex parte restraining order which precludes access alleging child is afraid of father, order changed to restraining father from taking child out of Ont, court refuses to renew after it lapses with no trouble |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
sr |
F |
R.J.J. v. K.R.J.,
2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets ex parte restraining order and limited supervised access for husband |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Cade v. Rotstein, 2002 CanLII 2811 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
|
Lump sum payments for increases in child support, pays 1.8 K per month child support, 3.5 K per month spousal support |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
sr |
M |
Fernbach v. Fernbach, 2004 CanLII 14589 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, pretrial striking prevents post trial motion, income imputed at 120 K |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Gallaugher v.
Gallaugher, 2005 CanLII 19767 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
2 lump sums to make up adjusted arrears or original apply. Fails to make all payments and arrears not rescinded |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
Gallaugher v.
Gallaugher, 2005 CanLII 19767 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Wife forces payment of support arrears through security on sale of house |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Liao v. Liao, 2003 CanLII 2167 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive interim possession to be reviewed in 2 months, man must pay $ 813 per month child support and $ 5000 per month spousal support going up to $ 6500 after wife leaves home |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Moreau v. Moreau, 2004 CanLII 822 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
25.0 |
Man is unemployed but imputed to 25 K |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Steffler v. McComb, 2005 CanLII 25955 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault and threatening not allowed in town, man gets custody, wife found in contempt with holding possessions and given 1 K fine and 2.5 K costs |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Boyko |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.7 |
Interim motion, $ 650 costs |
|
Boyko |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Fredriksen v. Lehane, 2003 CanLII 2122 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Wife has custody, arrested for drunk driving, temporary supervised access, custody given to father |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife also imputed, mild |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
sr |
sr |
Crocker v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 48314 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.8 |
$ 1750 costs offset against 4.5 K support arrears, mans arrears reduced |
|
Eberhard |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
McMurray v. Gerow, 2004 CanLII 5758 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.3 |
$ 1300 for repeated mobility motion, motion does not comply with court order to return the child to Ontario |
|
Ferguson |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.3 |
Interim motion on access variation, 0.3 K costs |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
F |
sr |
Brown v. Brown, 2007 CanLII 13703 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Unemployed woman imputed to 17 K, recieves spousal support and does not have to pay child support |
|
Olah |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.7 |
Interim motion, $ 675 costs |
|
Rogers |
F |
Ce |
M |
L |
V.T. v. V.S.1, 2006 CanLII 9157 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Abducts children, refuses to return them, criminal charges, 7 months additional for contempt of family court |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
F |
F |
G.W.H. v. L.E.B., 2006 CanLII 19944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Wife has remarried and stays home to take care of new family, imputed to 20 K income and must pay child support |
|
Scott |
F |
Ce |
M |
M |
T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Interim order freezing wifes assets granted, restraining order for wife and children against man |
|
Sills |
F |
Ce |
L |
L |
G.J.K. v. W.R.M., 2006 CanLII 23260 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Common law husband given exclusive possession but must pay $ 900 per month spousal support, husband has children but no child support ordered |
|
Wildman |
F |
Ce |
M |
F |
L.K. v. T.G., 2007 CanLII 10411 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Husband wins motion for unsupervised access, claims 20 K and gets 10 K, his contempt motion denied |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Heath v. Heath, 2006 CanLII 19458 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Contempt motion, wife empties house with moving van against direct court order, 5 K penalty, 15 K costs |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Heath v. Heath, 2006 CanLII 19458 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Contempt motion, wife empties house with moving van against direct court order, 5 K penalty, 15 K costs |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
F |
F |
Lundrigan v. Andrews, 2004 CanLII 34803 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Common law wife imputed frpm 5 K claimed to 15 K income, recieves 1.4 K spousal support |
|
Ditomaso |
M |
Ce |
|
|
Ross v. Pishalski, 2005 CanLII 9678 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
3.5 K for denied jurisdiction motion |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Hill v. Hill, 2005 CanLII 3476 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.0 |
Motion to enforce a separation agreement, husband claims 21 K gets 16 K |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.0 |
Divorce action, 9 K costs |
|
Glass |
M |
Ce |
F |
M |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2804 (ON S.C. |
mj |
L |
|
16 K lump sum for retroactive spousal support from equalization, 1 K per month support, security denied |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
D.E.W. v. E.C., 2005 CanLII 16603 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mother has custody for 11 years. Children taken by Childrens Aid, father given custody, initially supervised access then unsupervised, child support offset against fathers arrears |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Donnelly v. Donnelly, 2004 CanLII 9296 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.0 |
Wife pays 40 K costs for divorce action |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K for motion about house |
|
Howden |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
41.0 |
Mans income imputed 130 K per month, wife at 41 K per month, man pays 1.2 K per month total support, wife mild |
|
MacDougall |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Granted due to serious allegations with some corroboration |
|
McIsaac |
M |
Ce |
L |
L |
Monague v. Monague,
2005 CanLII 33584 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife charged with assault, takes children and leaves, wife gets custody |
|
McIssac |
M |
Ce |
M |
sr |
Cole v. Cole,
2005 CanLII 44828 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Intentionally underemployed as she earns less as a teacher, imputed to former income, retroactive support and s.7 expenses |
|
Nelson |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Bemrose v. Fetter,
2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Wifes has small imputed income, minor |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
F |
sr |
Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 2084 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
2 motions 10 K costs |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual allegations mutual non harassment order, son testifies mothers allegations aren’t true, joint custody with primary residence with wife, 1.8 K per month total support |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Savoie v. Richard, 2004 CanLII 47793 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Motion, husband asks for 6.8 K gets 2 K |
|
Perkins |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Wozniak v. Brunton, 2006 CanLII 273 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wifes access to child terminated for bizzare criminal behaviour including child abduction, restraining order from family cut from 500 m to 100 m |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
Caldwell v. Caldwell, 2007 CanLII 8918 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
Motion for support against wife who hasn’t paid, 20 K costs |
|
Timms |
M |
Ce |
M |
F |
Mercieca v. Merciera, 2003 CanLII 2184 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
15.0 |
Divorce action, 15 K costs |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
D.M.B. v. D.C.B., 2005 CanLII 24599 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Found in contempt for denial of access, no sanctions imposed |
|
Wood |
M |
Ce |
M |
M |
S.M.G. v. M.J.J.G., 2006 CanLII 16 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.5 |
Custody variance, husband asks 50 K gets 7.5 K |