Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Central West Ontario Judicial Region
Summary
Nov 2008
Central
West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties
Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Cw – Central West Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of
penalties to self represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
|
6 |
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
|
6 |
4 |
|
5 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
|
14 |
2 |
|
8 |
2 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
|
14 |
5 |
|
9 |
3 |
|
|
12 |
4 |
|
7 |
1 |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
|
14 |
5 |
|
12 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
|
11 |
4 |
|
8 |
2 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
|
15 |
4 |
|
9 |
2 |
|
|
6 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
|
14 |
1 |
|
12 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
|
28 |
4 |
|
15 |
4 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
|
10 |
6 |
|
7 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
|
9 |
2 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
|
7 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
|
11 |
8 |
|
9 |
7 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
O’Connor |
M |
Cw |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Quigley |
M |
Cw |
|
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Sproat |
M |
Cw |
|
4 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Thomas |
M |
Cw |
|
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
|
5 |
3 |
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
|
7 |
2 |
|
5 |
2 |
|
|
6 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Female Judges |
6 |
|
|
65 |
23 |
|
46 |
17 |
|
|
22 |
4 |
|
8 |
1 |
|
Male judges |
13 |
|
|
117 |
36 |
|
75 |
30 |
|
|
30 |
3 |
|
4 |
1 |
|
Total |
19 |
|
|
182 |
59 |
|
121 |
47 |
|
|
52 |
7 |
|
12 |
2 |
Central
West Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums
missing 1
N = 18 Mean =
90.0 Total = 1620
2.600 3.900 5.000 7.000 9.000 9.000 9.100 19.30 25.00 25.00 26.00 30.00 38.00 42.00 44.00 100.0 225.0 1000.
Male Imputed Income missing 2
N = 39 Mean =
52.7 Total = 2055.3
5.000 5.000 9.000 10.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.30 16.00 20.00 20.80 22.00 22.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 33.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 43.00 50.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 55.00 64.00 74.00 77.00 80.00 85.00 115.0 120.0 172.0 400.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 43 Mean =
51.5 Total = 2214.5
0.4000 0.8000 0.9000 1.500 1.500 1.700 1.700 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 3.000 3.300 3.500 5.500 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.500 7.200 7.200 8.000 8.200 8.600 9.200 9.500 10.00 10.00 10.90 19.50 19.50 31.50 34.00 34.00 38.00 38.00 48.00 48.60 117.0 183.0 183.8 275.0 997.7
Female Cost Penalties
N = 16 Mean =
23.2 Total = 371.2
0.2000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.000 5.800 6.100 6.300 12.00 12.00 12.00 13.70 14.50 21.60 252.9
Central
West Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce
– central east Cs – central south Cw
– central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Hagner v. Hawkins,
2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
43.0 |
Man claims 34 K and is imputed to 77 K |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei,
2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
5.5 K costs of motion |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei,
2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
15.0 |
Claims 22 K imputed to 37 K, retroactive arrears |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei,
2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
3.9 |
3.9 K lump sum for expenses for delay of sale of home |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Mantella v. Mantella, 2005 CanLII 26320 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.9 |
Motion to set aside separation agreement, wife asks 31.5 K and gets 10.9 K |
|
Baltman |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Martins v. Martins, 2006 CanLII 24242 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.2 |
Motion to set arrears, wife claims 13.6 K and gets 7.2 K costs |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
55.0 |
Man intentionally unemployed is imputed to 55 K which was maximum preseparation income |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order granted, 16 charges related to protesting divorce laws, wife the complaintant, convicted of assault and threatening wife, flagrant disregard for court orders and judicial system, imputed income, supervised access to children cut |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Protesting against divorce system, 16 criminal charges, walks out on trial, arrears 35 K, income imputed at 40 K, supervised access would be allowed, he has declined |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Leyland v. Baillie, 2006 CanLII 9311 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets house and support, house later sold |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Patan v. Patan, 2004 CanLII 50070 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
25 K retroactive support and 2.5 K per month |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Sherwood v. Sherwood, 2006 CanLII 40795 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
51.0 |
Man claims 40 K per year and is imputed to 91 K, |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
19.3 |
19.3 K lump sum for retroactive support to be paid from mans share of home |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
L |
L |
Gill v. Gill, 2006 CanLII 8467 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K costs for interim motion |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
sr |
L |
Helmy v. Helmy, 2000 CanLII 22452 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
1000.0 |
Over 1 million in damages for conspiracy and punitive damages, fraudulent conveyance, lottery winnings added back to net family property |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
sr |
L |
Helmy v. Helmy, 2000 CanLII 22452 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest on equalization over a million, over a million in damage awards |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Hicks v. Hicks, 2002 CanLII 49566 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man will designate wife as beneficiary of insurance as security for support, business not exluded from equalization adding 750 K, home transferred to wife |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Jardine v. Jardine, 2002 CanLII 2749 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
9.0 |
Prejudgment interest, constructive trust or equalization, 1.7 K per month spousal support, 9 K retroactive lump sum, parties not married |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Jardine v. Jardine, 2002 CanLII 2749 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest, constructive trust or equalization, 1.7 K per month spousal support, 9 K retroactive lump sum, parties not married |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Katsigannis v. Kottick-Katsigannis, 2000 CanLII 16999 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
17 K security released to wife |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
MJhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, man is in contempt, 10 K penalty, 15 K trust for security for support to be made, wife gets custody |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Sobotka v. Sobotka, 2005 CanLII 3399 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
9.0 |
9 K lump for past s.7 expenses |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Sobotka v. Sobotka, 2005 CanLII 3399 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 63 K equalization |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Stewart v. Jones, 2003 CanLII 2251 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Imputed income of 30 K upheld on appeal, s.7 expenses disallowed, no costs |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Trick v. Trick, 2006 CanLII 22926 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
117.0 |
117 K costs for divorce action |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Trick v. Trick, 2006 CanLII 22926 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
L |
225.0 |
225 K lump sum for retroactive child support, settlement agreement overturned, 2.2 K per month total support, claims he’s almost impecuous |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man charged and accused dozens of times, wife gets custody then loses custody then denied access |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Freezing order upheld on motion to set aside by Van Melle J |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Birkett v. Birkett, 2003 CanLII 1937 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Cavic v. Carroccia, 2006 CanLII 28554 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.7 |
$1650 for interim motion |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Islam v. Rahman, 2006 CanLII 22137 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
183.0 |
183 K costs of divorce action, 36 K of costs enforceable by FRO |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Kushnir v. Lowry, 2005 CanLII 20713 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
77.0 |
7 million equalization, 35 K per month retroative spousal support, man declares 30 K income and court finds he spent 107 monthly |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
10.0 |
Man claims average 8.5 K income over 8 years and is imputed an average 10 K per year |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
38.0 |
38 K lump sum for arrears and future support, short marriage, charging order for security |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
38 K lump sum for arrears and future support, short marriage, charging order for security |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
997.7 |
Divorce action, 997.7 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal, 20 K more costs |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Reid v. Reid,
2005 CanLII 20793 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
|
Lump sum obtained from estate of deceased ex husband |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Reid v. Reid, 2005 CanLII 2743 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
19.5 |
Divorce action, wife spends 62 K and gets 19.5 K |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2003 CanLII 2268 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion, wife asks 4.5 K gets 3 K |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2003 CanLII 2268 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
42.0 |
Lump sum of 42 K retroactive arrears |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Antonopoulos v.
Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
250 K to be retained by the court as security for wifes claims, 5.7 K per month total support, 265 K equalization, 610 K paid out to Revenue Canada |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Beitel v. Beitel, 2006 CanLII 60944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Man claims less than 10 K per year income and is imputed to 182 K, house vested with wife for arrears |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Beitel v. Beitel, 2006 CanLII 60944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
172.0 |
Man claims less than 10 K per year income and is imputed to 182 K, house vested with wife for arrears |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Bhasin v. Bhasin, 2006 CanLII 3270 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
100 K of mans assets frozen, man claims hardship and must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
|
|
Dumny v. Dumyn, 2005 CanLII 11784 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Summary judgment overturned on appeal |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Islam v. Rahman, 2006 CanLII 22137 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
183.8 |
Divorce action, 183.8 K |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
31.0 |
Man claims 27 K income and is imputes to 58 K |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Jordan v. Martins, 2004 CanLII 19145 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.4 |
0.2 K costs interim motion plus accrued interest of 0.2 K |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
F |
M |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
25.0 |
Man claims average 55 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Schwabe v. Schwabe,
2005 CanLII 37005 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
5.0 |
5 K lump payment for s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Wright v. Wright,
2004 CanLII 19944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Unemployed man imputed to 40 K per year, RRSP vested to wife for arrears |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Chaudhry v. Chaudhry, 2003 CanLII 2005 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.2 |
Interim motion, wife asks 46 K gets 9.2 K |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
L |
L |
Federici v. Therrien, 2004 CanLII 5037 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.2 |
Mans claim for a constructive trust dismissed 7.2 K costs |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
L |
L |
Hewat v. Hewat, 2003 CanLII 2131 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
5.0 |
Man claims 165 K income and is imputed to 170 K, wife imputed to 25 K in 3 months and support drops from 5.5 K per month to 4.5 K. |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
F |
M |
McLean v. Vassel, 2004 CanLII 33012 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.5 |
9.5 K for support variation including one of 2 interim motions, wife requested 88 K |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
F |
M |
McLean v. Vassel,
2004 CanLII 4031 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default on support, denied variation |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Ramcharitar v. Ramcharitar, 2003 CanLII 1997 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
34.0 |
Wife asks for 55 K partial or 98 K full and gets 34 K, post divorce action for custody access. |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
sr |
L |
S.R.S. v. A.H.H.,
2003 CanLII 2254 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
22.0 |
Unemployed man who has children during the day and every second weekend must pay employed wife $ 227 spousal support, income equal to wife imputed at 22 K per year |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
L |
S.R.S. v. A.H.H., 2004 CanLII 5038 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.2 |
Husband unemployed and retraining, 8.2 K cost penalty |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
2.6 |
2.5 K lump sum due within 14 days for arrears of child support, support increased to 1.3 K |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Wentsell v.
Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
165 K insurance policy to be held in trust, 2.5 K lump to cover support arrears, joint custody removed, child support increased to 1.3 K per month |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Wentzell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 4032 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
19.5 |
Trial cancelled due to agreement but husband gets 19.5 K costs for contempt motion withdrawn at last moment. |
|
Bellegham |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
J.D.K v. K.W.B.K, 2005 CanLII 38100 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
48.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks 73 K gets 48 K |
|
Bellegham |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Peters v. Peters, 2003 CanLII 2198 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest on equalization at 2/3 the rate |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Arenovich v. Arenovich, 2006 CanLII 17323 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Husband must maintain an insurance policy as security for support |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Beitel v. Beitel, 2004 CanLII 10698 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man given non depletion order, commits perjury about financial situation, request for advance on equalization denied as he might go bankrupt, criminal charges |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
sr |
L |
Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
7.0 |
Ordered to pay 7 K of support arrears in lump sum |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Felte v. Felte, 2003 CanLII 2118 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
100.0 |
Man to pay 100 K lump sum on equalization and 75 K lump sum on spousal support or 1.5 K per month, appeal dismissed |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Peters v. Peters, 2003 CanLII 2198 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
38.0 |
Divorce action, divided success wife gets at least 38 K costs |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Savage v. Pemberton Savage, 2004 CanLII 48868 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Motion to vary support dismissed 2.5 K costs |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Schmidt v. Seidel,
2003 CanLII 2417 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
22.0 |
Man acquitted of assault charges at separation, joint custody agreement, claims 118 K income and is imputed to 140 K, mutual restraining and non depletion orders on consent |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2246 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims less than 100 K income and is imputed to 140 K, wife gets 5 K per month support |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Smolders v. Smolders,
2003 CanLII 2247 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house and support |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Wells v. Wells,
2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
7.5 K spousal support per month, 5.6 K child support per month and maximum 675 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 350 K income and is imputed to 400 K |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Wells v. Wells,
2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man won’t attend at matrimonial home except for access, restraining order instead of exclusive possession, 13.5 K per month support |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, non depletion continued after trial for man, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income |
|
Bellighem |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Schmidt v. Seidel, 2004 CanLII 17443 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.9 |
Custody variation. joint custody changed to sole custody to wife, claims wife is alienating children, denied an assessment, $ 850 costs |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Bullock v. Bullock, 2004 CanLII 16949 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs for motion |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Bullock v. Bullock, 2004 CanLII 16949 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
120.0 |
Man takes early retirement at age 62, court says he is underemployed and imputes 120 K per year income, no variation of arrears |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, 2.2 K per month child support and 1.9 K child support, non depletion order |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, man to pay wife support, wife gets house, mans share of family home held for security |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Damer-Basso v. Basso,
2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans interest in home to be held as security and non depletion of RRSP |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Eagle v. Eagle, 2004 CanLII 2561 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
25 K lump sum for support arrears, refused variation, 2.5 K per month support |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order not to see children continued |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Iddon v. Iddon,
2006 CanLII 1450 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
36.0 |
Man is unemployed and is imputed to 36 K per year, variation refused |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
J.K. v. J.A.K., 2004 CanLII 16080 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Sexual assault allegations, no charges, supervised access ordered, an assessment ordered to see if access can be unsupervised, some conditions relaxed |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Mantella v. Mantella, 2006 CanLII 17337 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
38.0 |
Man sues wife and her divorce lawyer, 14 K plus 1 K for cost submission to wife, 22 K plus 1 K cost submission to lawyer |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
15.3 |
Man claims 12.7 K income inputed to 28 K |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Procyk v. Procyk, 2006 CanLII 18370 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
85.0 |
3.5 K per month spousal support, 70 K and 35 K lump sums, man claims 65 K income but is imputed to 150 K, wife remarries man who makes 142 K per year |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Salvador v. Salvador, 2004 CanLII 5861 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Only seen daughters 2 times in 2 years for 5 minute supervised access, extensive court and assessment delays, access motion adjourned and supervised access continued |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2004 CanLII 36132 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K costs for motion |
|
Fragomen |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Lowe v. Lowe, 2006 CanLII 729 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man imputed for future business, wife not imputed for child support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Balram v. Balram, 2003 CanLII 15395 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Man becomes unemployed and variation refused |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Bertolin v. Flavelle, 2004 CanLII 10705 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possesion of home and interim custody |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Bertolin v. Flavelle, 2004 CanLII 10705 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
16.0 |
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Court gives wife exclusive possession of family home until sale, 1.5 K per month spousal support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non dissipation order |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Bradley v. Bradley, 2003 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.5 |
Wife gets 6.5 K for interim motion |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Collin v. Collin, 2005 CanLII 48919 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Support variation, divided success, wife gets 1.5 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Cunningham v.
Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
74.0 |
Man claims 65 K and is imputed to 139 K, non dissipation order |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
Man works on contract for over 100 K then is unemployed, income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Elder v. Elder, 2005 CanLII 48920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, home sold, wife gets 2 K per month support and may use family assets for medical treatment |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Elder v. Elder, 2006 CanLII 3276 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Motion to vary support, husband asks 10.3 K and wife gets 3.5 K |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, husband pays 4 K per month total support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife is charged with assault and says man assaulted her, court gives mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 4 K per month total support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Interim motion, 2.5 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Lowe v. Lowe, 2006 CanLII 3280 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Motion, 6 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.7 |
Interim motion 1.7 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
$ 507 per month child support and $ 100 per month spousal support, 16.5 K arrears, man claims 40 K and is imputed to 60 K |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
7.5 K to be held by lawyer as security ordered paid to wife |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife has interim exclusive possession of home and custody and support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Rae v. Rae, 2006 CanLII 33674 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
64.0 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 110 K |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
15.0 |
Man claims 35 K income imputed to 50 K, 162 K arrears to be paid from house, 50 K to be held as security |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man claims 35 K income imputed to 50 K, 162 K arrears to be paid from house, 50 K to be held as security |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Trick v. Trick, 2005 CanLII 48923 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Wifes motion for husbands non compliance, vesting order, upheld on appeal, 10 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Trick v. Trick, 2005 CanLII 48923 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Wifes motion for husbands non compliance, vesting order, upheld on appeal, 10 K costs |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Umholtz v. Umholtz,
2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
9.1 |
9.1 K lump for retroactive support for one child to be paid from equalization, support of other child adjourned |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Finch v. Finch, 2003 CanLII 9776 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Support variation, wife asks for 23 K and gets 6 K |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Gill v. Gill, 2006 CanLII 8467 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
0.75 K for interim motion |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Rachiele v. Rachiele, 2005 CanLII 32920 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans civil claims and motion to vary support dismissed |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Starr v. Starr,
2004 CanLII 18698 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
115.0 |
Man claims a 70 K income and is imputed to 185 K |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
275.0 |
16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 275 K costs including appeal |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 275 K costs including appeal |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Wilson-Embree v. Embree, 2007 CanLII 36636 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
52.0 |
Man claims 48 K and is imputed to 100 K, 20.6 K retroactive arrears |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Camilleri v. Camilleri, 2000 CanLII 22465 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
1.8 K support, 20 K arrears. Charging order against mans home, vaeiation denied |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Erwin v. Erwin, 2004 CanLII 5046 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Set aside after trial but he gets equalization |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man found in multiple contempt, charging order on house, sentencing hearing |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man unemployed is imputed to 60 K then to 100 K, total support of 2.15 K per month to be paid to wife, wife imputed to 20 K, wife mild |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
44.0 |
Lump sum of 44 K for support arrears, 2.5 K per month total support, contempt for not returning children on time, wife separates by abducting children and gets custody, mans proceeds from sale of house to be held as security, vesting order on RRSP, imputed income |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order on house as security for support, vesting order on RRSP for equalization, sentencing hearing for contempt, imputed income |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 2002 CanLII 2792 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Motion to change jurisdiction, 6 K costs |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
I(ex) |
M |
Sangster v. Sangster,
2003 CanLII 48248 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
D |
|
Default set aside on appeal |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
ex |
L |
Wedgbury v. Wedgbury, 2006 CanLII 10531 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets ex parte order for custody and exclusive possession of home, wife denies access and husband is later given custody and exclusive possession |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Dumoulin v. Dumoulin, 2004 CanLII 824 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Access to child must be supervised by another adult, supervision removed after man proves himself not taking drugs |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Fancett v. Deprato, 2006 CanLII 2402 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
34.0 |
Wife asks for 68 K and gets 34 K for divorce action |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
26.0 |
26 K lump sum for child and spousal support to be taken from proceeds of home |
|
MacKenzie |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Irwin v. Irwin,
2005 CanLII 8725 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Defaults on extraordinary expense, separation agreement upheld |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Irwin v. Irwin, 2005 CanLII 8725 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
33.0 |
Mans income imputed at 33 K |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Irwin v. Irwin, 2006 CanLII 5451 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
31.5 |
Divorce action, wife claims 47 K and gets 31.5 K, husband claims 42 K |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
McGahey v. McGahey,
2006 CanLII 5456 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Abdilla v. Abdilla,
2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Man unemployed imputed to 30 K and declared intentionally unemployed |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 3 years prejudgment interest on 110 K equalization payment |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
80.0 |
Man claims 30 K income and is imputed to 110 K, 3.5 K spousal support, arrears not rescinded |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 3 years prejudgment interest on 775 K |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets possession of home |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Mergelos v. Mergelos, 2005 CanLII 13789 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans motion for equalization is dismissed by summary judgment |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Nanan v. Nanan,
2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.6 |
Claims 83 K imputed to 88 K, pays 1.5 K spousal support and 2 K mortgage, and 0.7 K child support, 8.6 K costs |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Nanan v. Nanan,
2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
5.0 |
Claims 83 K imputed to 88 K, pays 1.5 K spousal support and 2 K mortgage, and 0.7 K child support, 8.6 K costs |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.8 |
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
35.0 |
Man claims 75 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife gets home and custody and 4.5 K interim support |
|
O’Conner |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Johnson v. McFadyen, 2005 CanLII 8727 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
O’Connor |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Dobre v. Dobre, 2004 CanLII 17889 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
False domestic violence charges, supervised access, woman also accuses grandparents of threats |
|
Quigley |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Gainer v. Gainer, 2006 CanLII 12969 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
400.0 |
3.3 K per month spousal support, 22 K arrears, wife seeks 475 K for damages, both husband and wife are unemployed and court imputes 400 K to husband and 60 K to wife |
|
Quigley |
M |
Cw |
sr |
|
Lawrie v. Turcotte, 2006 CanLII 12971 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on custody and spousal support, man may still have trial on supervised v unsupervised access |
|
Quigley |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Lawrie v. Turcotte, 2006 CanLII 12971 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Criminal charges, no contact with child school ordered, supervised access at wifes discretion |
|
Sproat |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Benak v. Benak, 2006 CanLII 6906 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
48.6 |
Divorce action, wife gets 48.6 K costs |
|
Sproat |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Dobre v. Dobre, 2004 CanLII 17889 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife makes false allegations against man and grandparents, wife gets custody |
|
Sproat |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Hobbs v. Hobbs, 2007 CanLII 26282 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
Success on motions divided, wife asks 53.5 K and gets 8 K |
|
Sproat |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Lemmon v. Lemmon, 2004 CanLII 24123 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.3 |
Divorce action, wife gets 3.3 K |
|
Thomas |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual, man gets home, woman gets support, man violates non dissipation order, man has duty council assisting him |
|
Thomas |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, non dissipation order, contempt hearing for man for trial for disposing of assets, wife gets custody and 1.8 K per month total support, man has duty council assisting him |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets support, house not mentioned, wife claims husband has given false income |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
sr |
|
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
9.0 |
Man declares 4 K income imputed to 13 K, 6 K in s.7 expenses |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Unsupervised access disallowed by wife, arrears of support, access terminated , charging order |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
sr |
F |
Pearson v. McAteer,
2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Arrears of 13 K in child support, charging order put on land, access to child denied |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Tiraborelli v. Tiraborelli, 2004 CanLII 27352 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
5 K security for costs of action to be posted |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
ex |
L |
Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
37.0 |
Man intentionally unemployed for leaving the country, lump sum retroactive support, vesting order, made 8 K imputed to 45 K |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
ex |
F |
Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
30.0 |
30 K spousal lump sum payment plus 1K per month and 387 K retroactive child support, income imputed , intentionally unemployed |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
ex |
L |
Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man did not attend divorce trial, 30 K lump sum, 1 K per month spousal support, imputed income, vesting order against assets as security, full indemnity costs |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
L.P.G.M. v. J.M., 2006 CanLII 5455 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man catches wife changing locks on house and sprays liquid soap on her and mother, convicted of assault, wife tries to have him arrested 4 more times, 5 Children Aids complaints by wife, wife witholds access and is in contempt, sole custody changed to joint |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Matti v. Matti, 2005 CanLII 39889 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Mwangi v. Wahome, 2004 CanLII 48888 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
14.0 |
Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 1.5 K per month total support |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Mwangi v. Wahome, 2004 CanLII 48888 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Interim restraining order due to history of assaultive behaviour,, wife gets custody, 1.5 K per month total support |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
A.F. v. I.V.,
2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Woman found in contempt for false allegations and denial of access, custody given to man, 5 K penalty |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
sr |
D.J.C. v. N.C.,
2004 CanLII 47783 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Found in contempt alienating man, 10 K cost penalty, 30 days if not paid |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
L.G.P.M. v. J.M., 2003 CanLII 2329 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Contempt for denial of access $ 500 fine |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Mancini v. Mancini, 2004 CanLII 9995 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
C |
|
Woman found in contempt for denial of access, overturned on appeal |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Found in contempt for denial of access and false allegations, custody given to man, 14.5 K cost penalty |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
L.P.G.M. v. J.M.,
2006 CanLII 5455 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Finding of contempt against wife overturned on appeal |
|
Blair |
|
Cw |
F |
M |
Bourque v. Haney, 2003 CanLII 2068 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.8 |
Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, asks 6.9 K gets 5.8 K |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 32619 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
252.9 |
Divorce action lasting 11 years where wife made numerous false allegations, 252.9 K costs |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
sr |
Euteneier v. Euteneier, 2007 CanLII 9609 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.3 |
6.3 K costs of motion, woman declared a vextacious litigant and must get leave of court to file |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
14.5 |
Found in contempt for denial of access and false allegations, custody given to man, 14.5 K cost penalty |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2326 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.2 |
Interim motion, $ 150, wife has not paid 6 K costs of trial which is under appeal |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
L |
Stanley v. Stanley, 2003 CanLII 2351 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
13.7 |
Husband gets wifes action stayed 13.7 K costs |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
M |
F |
Voce v. Gibson, 2003 CanLII 778 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Cts |
12.0 |
12 K costs of trial overturned to 4 K on appeal |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
J.P.S.V. v. M.V., 2006 CanLII 10530 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Support variation, 2.5 K costs |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
sr |
Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
12.0 |
Divorce action, husband asks 40 K costs and gets 12 K, 2 adjournments $ 1250 |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2246 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion to set support, 3 K costs, wife gets 5 K per month support |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2.0 K costs for interim motion |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
M |
F |
Gazo v. Gazo,
2005 CanLII 3386 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.1 |
6.1 K costs for motion against wife, Wife obtains ex parte non depletion and seizure orders, overturned on appeal as court lacked jurisdiction |
|
Quigly |
M |
Cw |
M |
sr |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2007 ONCA 218 (CanLII) |
mj |
Cts |
21.6 |
21.6 K costs of divorce action, upheld on appeal, 3.5 K costs of appeal, leave provision rescinded |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
F |
M |
Finucan v. Finucan, 2006 CanLII 30590 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Motion, 3 K costs |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Sincovich v. Sincovich, 2005 CanLII 33591 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
12.0 |
Husband successful in custody support application, claims 45 K gets 12 K costs |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
M |
sr |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2006 CanLII 20857 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
3 K costs of interim motion |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Wedgbury v. Wedgbury, 2006 CanLII 10531 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife denies husband access and husband given exclusive possession of home and custody |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Mikan v. Mikan, 2004 CanLII 5062 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
First wife gets exclusive possession and then it is reversed to father due to wifes denials of access. House then to be sold. Joint custody, mother pays father 1.4 K per month child support after set off |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Stafford v. Rebane, 2004 CanLII 34080 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wifes motion for sale of home rejected and husbands motion for exclusive interim possession allowed, man must pay wife 12 K per month spousal support, man has custody |
|
Coats |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Leyland v. Baillie, 2006 CanLII 9311 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets house and support, house later sold |
|
Fragomeni |
F |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual freezing order, man pays 4 K per month support |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Birkett v. Birkett, 2003 CanLII 1937 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Smolders v. Smolders,
2003 CanLII 2247 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house and support |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order continued against man after uncontested trial |
|
Corbett |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house, mans share of family home held for security |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
sr |
M |
Bhasin v. Bhasin, 2006 CanLII 3270 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Wifes assets frozen later after husbands assets frozen, husband must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual freezing order, wife gets exclusive possession of home and 1.5 K spousal support per month |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Elder v. Elder, 2005 CanLII 48920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, home sold, wife gets 2 K per month support and may use family assets for medical treatment |
|
Mackenzie |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
McGahey v. McGahey,
2006 CanLII 5456 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Murray |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Thomas |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, man gets home, woman gets support, man violates non dissipation order |
|
Thompson |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, wife gets support, house not mentioned, wife claims husband has given false income |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
sr |
D.J.C. v. N.C., 2004 CanLII 47783 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
25.0 |
Wifes income imputed at 25 K, Mans income 196 K, wife recieves 4.9 K per month total support, mild |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
L |
L |
Hewat v. Hewat, 2003 CanLII 2131 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
25.0 |
Wife imputed to 25 K , combined spousal and child support reduced to 4.5 K per month from 5.5 K, mild |
|
Wein |
F |
Cw |
L |
L |
MacMillan v. MacMillan, 2002 CanLII 2685 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
14.0 |
Wife imputed from declared income of 6 K to 20 K, wife recieves total support of 4.5 K per month reduced from 5.25 K due to drop in mans income, mild |
|
Langdon |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man unemployed is imputed to 60 K then to 100 K, total support of 2.15 K per month to be paid to wife, wife imputed to 20 K, wife mild |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2162 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Summary judgement on wifes child support motion overturned |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2162 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both parties ask for restraining order, mans claim is accepted wifes claim dismissed, wife gets custody, wifes child support claim dismissed but reinstated on appeal. |
|
Seppi |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
MJhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, man is in contempt, 10 K penalty, 15 K trust for security for support to be made, wife gets custody |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged and accused dozens of times, wife gets custody then loses custody then denied access |
|
Belleghem |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Shaw v. Shaw,
2005 CanLII 18878 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Non harassment order against wife, man gets custody |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
M |
M |
Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Fragomeni |
M |
Cw |
F |
F |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife is charged with assault and says man assaulted her, court gives mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 4 K per month total support |
|
Thomas |
M |
Cw |
Sr |
F |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, non dissipation order, contempt hearing for man for trial for disposing of assets, wife gets custody and 1.8 K per month total support, man has duty council assisting him |
|
Tulloch |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
Matti v. Matti, 2005 CanLII 39889 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody |
|
Snowie |
F |
Cw |
M |
M |
A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Wife makes multiple false allegations resulting in 4 years of supervised access, man given custody and wife supervised access, contempt, 5 K fine |
|
Van Melle |
F |
Cw |
F |
M |
Sekhon v. Jawanda, 2002 CanLII 2645 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Granted supervised access changed to unsupervised changed to interim custody, man and family found to be interferring with relationship |
|
Kruzick |
M |
Cw |
L |
L |
N.S. v. D.A.S., 2003 CanLII 2448 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Supervised access continued until wife has a mental exam, husband has custody |