Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Eastern Ontario Judicial Region
Summary
Nov 2008
Eastern
Region Penalties and Cost Penalties
Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region E - Eastern Region
# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Aiken |
F |
E |
|
33 |
13 |
|
20 |
9 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
|
25 |
12 |
|
20 |
10 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
|
33 |
16 |
|
26 |
14 |
|
|
6 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
LaFrance-Cardinal |
F |
E |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
|
38 |
9 |
|
20 |
3 |
|
|
7 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
|
10 |
5 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
|
6 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Robertson |
F |
E |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Toscano Roccano |
F |
E |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
|
5 |
5 |
|
5 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
|
9 |
4 |
|
6 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Chadwick |
M |
E |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Charboneau |
M |
E |
|
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Cosgrove |
M |
E |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Cusson |
M |
E |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
|
5 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Kealy |
M |
E |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
|
9 |
6 |
|
7 |
5 |
|
|
4 |
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Mackinnon C |
M |
E |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Macleod |
M |
E |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Manton |
M |
E |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Maranger |
M |
E |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
|
6 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Pedlar |
M |
E |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Power |
M |
E |
|
16 |
10 |
|
9 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Roy |
M |
E |
|
4 |
4 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
|
9 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
|
5 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Sheffield |
M |
E |
|
3 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
|
6 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Female Judges |
10 |
|
|
154 |
62 |
|
102 |
44 |
|
|
18 |
2 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
Male judges |
20 |
|
|
86 |
40 |
|
46 |
24 |
|
|
12 |
4 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Total |
30 |
|
|
240 |
103 |
|
146 |
68 |
|
|
30 |
6 |
|
5 |
1 |
Eastern
Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums missing
2
N = 16 Mean =
47.4 Total = 758.4
3.300 4.100 5.400 6.000 8.000 8.000 10.00 23.00 36.00 40.00 42.00 45.00 52.00 54.00 57.00 365.0
Male Imputed Income missing 2
N = 30 Mean =
41.1 Total = 1233.0
2.000 4.000 5.600 8.000 9.000 11.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 18.00 20.00 25.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 33.00 40.00 40.00 45.00 47.00 50.00 61.60 68.00 69.00 85.00 94.00 97.00 115.0 132.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 76 Mean =
12.3 Total = 934.8
0.5000 0.8000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.800 3.800 3.800 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.100 4.300 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 5.700 5.800 6.500 6.500 7.500 7.500 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.000 9.600 9.700 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.10 15.00 15.00 17.00 18.00 18.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 25.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 36.90 40.00 40.00 49.00 50.70 60.90 95.00
Female Cost Penalties
N = 14 Mean =
13.4 Total = 187.6
1.300 1.500 3.000 4.500 4.800 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 10.00 20.00 46.00 70.00
Eastern
Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
25.0 |
Man claims 125 K income and is imputed to 171 by Mackinnon J and 150 K by Aitken J, 4.8 K per month total support |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, she is denied exclusive possession but family home is vested to her |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Contempt $ 500 fine |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs of motion |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
Man declared 2 K income imputed to 15 K, man claims to be disabled but court finds he has a cash business |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Woman owes man equalization but his income imputed and his equalization held as security for child support payments, unemployed, denied spousal support |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
36.0 |
36 K lump sum for spousal support |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest on equalization |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must maintain a 100 K life insurance policy, also freezing order by Brennan J |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Cameron v. MacGillivray, 2005 CanLII 47696 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife awarded prejudgment interest on 12 K equalization |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Doherty v. Wilcox, 2007 CanLII 5527 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Support variation, divided success, wife asks 8.3 K and gets 4 K |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
5 K cost award for divorce trial, 5 K for 2 interim cost awards also |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
J.R. v. J.G.,
2005 CanLII 14983 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for threatening, police assistance in retrieving items refused, mans contempt motion dismissed as he violated court orders, aceess to son suspended until he has counselling |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21 K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 % |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
40.0 |
40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 % |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 215 ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 % |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Jonas v. Jonas, 2003 CanLII 1967 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
22.5 |
Divorce action 2 day trial, husbands pleadings struck, 22.5 K costs |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
N.S. v.D.S.,
2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
No more motions until payments are made |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
8.0 |
Lump sums of 4.5 K and 3.5 K for costs and arrears of support, didn’t make equalization payment of 15 K, support 2 K per month total, no more motions until support is paid, wife allowed to move to Nova Scotia with children |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
N.S. v.D.S.,
2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man gets 18 month restraining order for assault, says wife assaulted him too, wife gets custody, allowed to move to Nova Scotia |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim possession of the family home, man must pay $ 1325 child support and $ 500 spousal support retroactive |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 196 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.8 |
Interim motion, wife asks 5.9 K and gets 3.8 K |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Sleiman v. Sleiman,
2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
42.0 |
Lump sum 42 K for child support, pleadings struck, 15 K equalization and 15 K constructive trust |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man given supervised access with conditions for unsupervised, conditions never met, no more contact, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, custody to wife no access order made, lump sum and imputation |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.1 |
Wife asks 95.1 K for divorce action And gets 12 K for post appeal motion |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
Man claims 27 K and is imputed to 40 K |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
33.0 |
Man retrains and is intentionally unemployed and imputed at former level of 33 K, arrears |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 25768 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Motion to vary support, wife asks for 8.7 K and gets 5 K costs |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
sr |
Testa v. Basi, 2005 CanLII 25186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
4.0 |
Man bankrupted and living in trailer is imputed from 21 K to 25 K per year |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
sr |
T.P.S. v. K.E.S, 2006 CanLII 17382 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Vukovic v. Vukovic,
2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
69.0 |
2K per month spousal support, 40 K arrears, man claims 101 K income and is imputed to 170 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
ex |
F |
Ahern v. Ahern, 2007 CanLII 37672 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
$ 1762 per month child support, $ 270 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses and retroactive support of 35.9 K, 5 K costs |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Biddle v. Biddle,
2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man given non depletion order, 9 K per month total support, interim disbursement of 20 K to wife |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
94.0 |
Man declared 228 K imputed to 322 K, 9 K per month retroactive |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Biddle v. Biddle, 2005 CanLII 7660 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.0 |
Wife claims 19.5 K for interim support motion and gets 12 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Cutillas v. Proulx, 2001 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 3 years |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, 3.1 K per month child support and 1.7 K per month spousal support |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 42254 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Motion, Wife claims 8.4 K and gets 4 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support, |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502 |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502 |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man charged with assault given supervised access at interim motion and trial |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502 |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502kim |
mj |
Ep |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets exclusive possession and interim custody, house transferred to wife at uncontested trial |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
28.0 |
Man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order to secure child support arrears not rescinded |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
Interim motion to strike pleadings, 2.5 K costs, previous interim motion for custody, 5.5 K costs |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
N.L. v. J.C.,
2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Pleadings not struck but made to sign disclosure release |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck and his defense is disallowed including a constitutional challenge |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Piskor v. Piskor, 2004 CanLII 5023 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
18.0 |
Support variation, 18 K costs |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
27.0 |
Man declares 36 K and court imputes 63 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Stratton v. Kangas, 2001 CanLII 26440 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
28.0 |
Man on welfare is imputed to 28 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Stratton v. Kangas, 2002 CanLII 46690 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Wife sucessful on 2 out of 3 issues, 3.5 K partial indemnity asked and gets 2 K |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
15.0 |
Mans 26 K income imputed to 41 K, sexual assault on child allegations unproven, supervised access |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G.,
2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, wife gets custody and asks access terminated, first unsupervised, then by parents, then supervised access center ordered, wife makes sexual assault allegation |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mans supervised access is continued, mother asks it be terminated, criminal record, ron stewart, child support increased |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Zlater v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 30664 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.6 |
Motion for university expense, 9.6 K costs, ruling better than offer to settle |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Biraben v. Pelland, 2006 CanLII 25614 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man accused of assault allowed supervised access with grandparent, wife gets custody |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
18.5 |
Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears, 18.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Brophy v. Brophy,
2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Brophy v. Brophy,
2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims 200 K income and is imputed to 240 K, 8 K per month support |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 1920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Interim motion for possession of home and leave to appeal, 3.5 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Davis v Morris 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
D |
|
Motion to overturn ex parte default order striking pleadings dismissed, overturned on appeal |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 8635 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Man achieves substancial success on motion to vary but wife gven 10 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Pleadings struck, freezing order |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Pleadings struck, freezing order |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife allowed to move to japan |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic assault, Childrens Aid orders no access, court then orders supervised access, wife given custody and allowed to move to Japan |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
M.I. v. J.R., 2005 CanLII 7663 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
15.0 |
Divorce action, wife allowed to move to Japan, 15 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, then threats, hasn’t seen son in 2 years, acess denied |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Charged with assault, plead guilty, harassment charges, wife denies access, supervised access at wifes discretion ordered, wife requests access terminated |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
Sr |
F |
Martin v. Martin, 2007 CanLII 8638 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.0 |
Support variation,40 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
365.0 |
Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R., 2003 CanLII 1918 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
36.9 |
Divorce action, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 36.9 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
P.S. v. J.S.,
2005 CanLII 16590 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for assault, false sexual assault allegations, joint custody changed to sole custody to man |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 3.5 K per month spousal support, variation stayed until arrears paid |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
F |
F |
R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
10 K lumps sum compensatory support |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, 36 K in cost arrears, child support default with FRO, refused variation |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
45.0 |
Man with no income and heavy stock losses imputed to 45 K and support set at 54 K |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets restraining order from false assault allegations, man acquitted, court gives wife permanent restraining roorder, strikes pleadings, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally unemployed |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial, |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Scott v. McKinley, 2002 CanLII 13273 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man gets only one supervised visit per year with his child, access increased to 3 times on appeal |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Surrette v. Johnson, 2003 CanLII 2282 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
Support variation, divided success, 1 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.0 |
Motion for leave to appeal, 9 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Husband did not include imputed income on notice of appeal |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Supervised access continued |
|
LaFrance-Cardinal |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, wife gets interim custody |
|
LaFrance-Cardinal |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Wylie v. Leclair, 2003 CanLII 49737 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
1K trial costs changed to 11 K but man gets 3 K costs of appeal, 150 K unjust enrichment award reduced to 70 K |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 27600 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
17.0 |
Uncontested trial judgement against wife set aside, 17 K costs against husband and his lawyer |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
132.0 |
Mans declared income of 43 K imputed to 175 K, 2.85 K per month total support, security deposit |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security. |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, mans motion for summary judgment denied, 2 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Interim motions, 2 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
5.6 |
Man claims 6.9 K income and is imputed to 12.5 K |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
4.1 |
Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
F. v. V., 2002 CanLII 2767 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
95.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks for 158 K and gets 95 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Gomez v. Bartusch, 2003 CanLII 37828 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Summary judgment denied, 3.5 K costs of motion |
|
Mackinnon j |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Guy v. Tulloch,
2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
47.0 |
Man claims 55 K imputed to 102 K. |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Guy v. Tulloch,
2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
47.0 |
Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security. |
|
Mackinnon j |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 15397 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
25.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks 35 K and gets 25 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton,
2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed to 100 K reset at trial |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton,
2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed from 80 K to 100 K reset at trial |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
Sr |
M |
Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Properties transferred to wife for sale |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Contempt motion, 3.5 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
Sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs by Trousdale J |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Likins v. MacKenzie, 2004 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Divorce action. Arbitrators cost award of 110 K reduced to 67 K, 10 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Mavis v. Mavis, 2005 CanLII 14002 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization at a lower rate |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
N.(D.) v. E.(T.), 2000 CanLII 21156 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.5 |
Wife wins trial of custody and gets 6.5 K costs, asks for 10 K |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R.,
2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.8 |
$ 1750 for 2 interim motions to set aside and leave to appeal the order of Byers J |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
Ex |
L |
Pelda v. O'Leary, 2006 CanLII 25536 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Wife gets ex parte freezing order, man sells company and may be able to pay more spousal support |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
52.0 |
Woman has pension entitlement from separation agreement and man goes bankrupt, claim not defeated by bankruptcy, 52 K lump sum for equalization and support |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Freezing order on RRSP until lump sum is paid |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Pre judgment interest on 52 K award |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
25.0 |
Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Silver v. Mercer, 2003 CanLII 2039 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.3 |
Wife gets 4.3 K for motion to set support |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Simpkins v. Simpkins, 2004 CanLII 28909 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Mintes of settlement waving spousal support set aside for fraud, 2.3 K spousal support, man must designate wife as beneficiary of 200 K life insurance policy, 12 K costs of appeal. |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
sr |
Smith v. Smith, 2000 CanLII 22455 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.6 |
1.6 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson,
2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mans 8 K bank account to be preserved and not depleted, contempt for depletion |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
57.0 |
57 K lump sum against past arrears claim |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
115.0 |
Man claims 35 K on taxes and is imputed to 150 K income |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
23.0 |
23 K lump sum for retroactive arrears |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
45 K GIC for security |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
L |
Westendorp v. Westendorp, 2000 CanLII 22538 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
8 K costs for constitutional challenge, 4 K to wife and 4 K to FRO |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
3.3 |
Lump sum of 3.3 K for s.7 expenses, wife found in contempt for not selling house |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Boileau v. Boileau,
2003 CanLII 2288 (ON S.C |
mn |
Sc |
|
Secure support against life insurance policy or first charge on estate, 69 K of pension transferred to wife, $ 600 support, mild |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
ex |
M |
Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Cts |
8.0 |
8 K costs of striking motion, varied to $ 750 on appeal, 6 K costs of appeal against wife. |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
exr |
M |
Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
St |
|
Mans pleading struck at ex parte hearing, overturned on appeal |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
54.0 |
54 K lump sum including 20 K for spousal support and child support arrears and special expenses, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, life insurance policy for security |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, anger management courses, joint custody with primary residence to wife, paid 380 K equalization, 20 K lump sum retroactive spousal support arrears, 34 K retroactive child support arrears, 1.1 K per month child support |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Maceus-Agyekum v.
Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy for security, 54 K lump sum, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, joint custody |
|
Metivier |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 42 K lump sum child support |
|
Metrivier |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Glance v. Glance, 2000 CanLII 20393 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Metrivier |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
Additional 50 K per year income imputed, retroactive support, s.7 expenses, lump sum arrears |
|
Metrivier |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
O'Brien v. Griffin, 2004 CanLII 10709 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
61.6 |
Man claims 51.4 K income and is imputed to 115 K, 100 K arrears, vexatious litigant order, new trial of support ordered on appeal |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
F |
sr |
Brazeau v. Lefebvre, 2003 CanLII 2165 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Self represented wife gets 5 K costs |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Fequet v. Petelka Fequet, 2003 CanLII 2200 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
9.7 |
Divorce action, husband asks for 21 K and wife gets 9.7 K |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R.,
2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.5 |
$ 500 for interim motion |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Pollen v. Pollen,
2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
8.0 |
8 K lump sum for support |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
5.4 |
Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest |
|
Robertson |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
A. E. M. v. J. E. M., 2004 CanLII 22310 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restrianing order against man, 1.5 K costs of appeal |
|
Robertson |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, sentenced to jail for contempt previously ordered by Dunbar K |
|
Toscano Roccano |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Lakhani v. Lakhani, 2003 CanLII 2160 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.0 |
9 K to wife for motion |
|
Toscano Romano |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion, 1.5 K costs |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.0 |
Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
68.0 |
2 K income imputed to 70 K, pleadings struck, wife gets exclusive possession of home then vesting order, 1.3 K per month total support |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
2 lump sum payments already made, 40 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K in retroactive spousal support, 53 K equalization and vesting order for house, 40 K costs, restraining order, pleadings struck |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Domestic assault, temporary retraining order still in effect, pleadings struck, 40 K costs |
|
Trousdale |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic assault, supervised access, hasn’t seen children, pleadings struck, imputed income, 45 K retroactive support, 35 K cost penalty |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
97.0 |
Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
6.0 |
6 K lump sum for retroactive support, |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Wife asks 11 K and gets 3.5 K for support / income determination motion |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man on unemployment imputed at 40 K per year |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Plead guilty to assaulting kids, minimal supervised access with unspecified increased, imputed income |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
M |
M |
McCaw v. McCaw, 2007 CanLII 6920 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
35.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks 69 K gets 35 K costs |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
L |
L |
Murano, Re, 2004 CanLII 17633 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Jailed for disclosure, denied a trial FRO default set to trial, owes 158 K |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson,
2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Man in contempt for not signing over house to wife and depleting bank account, Feb 2005 post trial motion |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
sr |
sr |
Young v. O'Neil, 2003 CanLII 2370 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Granted as after separation man leaves phone messages and goes in house to take photos as evidence of differential living standards, income imputed |
|
Chadwick |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Fisher v. Fisher, 2003 CanLII 2119 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Mans contempt sufficiently purged |
|
Chadwick |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Contempt, man gets 120 days and new wife gets 60 days in jail, fraudulent conveyance |
|
Charbonneau |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Jail threatened, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, assets frozen |
|
Charbonneau |
M |
E |
L |
L |
Poirier v. Poirier, 2006 CanLII 2188 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
36.0 |
Divorce, 36 K costs |
|
Charbonneau |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
34.0 |
Divorce action 34 K costs |
|
Cosgrove |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 4 years, 11 interim orders |
|
Cosgrove |
M |
E |
M |
F |
N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
3.5 K costs |
|
Cusson |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Donaldson v. Dénommée, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year, 8 K costs |
|
Cusson |
M |
E |
L |
L |
Lavigne v. MacCaskill, 2003 CanLII 2014 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife falsely alleges assault and theft, child testifies wife is abusive, joint custody |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 2.3 K per month child support |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
8.0 |
Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
K. v. K., 2004 CanLII 12506 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody, 15 K per month child support |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Lajoie v. Lajoie,
2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
31.0 |
Mans declared income is 12 K but is imputed to 43 K |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum |
|
Kealy |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Aukstuolyte v. Balchun, 2005 CanLII 27896 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Bourgon v. Paquette,
2004 CanLII 5924 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
18.0 |
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, settled intention on children reserved for trial, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, man claims 47 K income imputed to 65 K, wife has 45 K income |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
F |
D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Harris v. Harris, 2000 CanLII 17048 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Second mortgage ordered put on mans property and assigned to wife for 5 K per month support, stay denied |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
sr |
sr |
J.B.G. v. L.B.,
2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty, previous 12K cost penalty |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
sr |
sr |
J.B.G. v. L.B.,
2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
ex |
F |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
11.0 |
11 K costs for motion |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
ex |
F |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
85.0 |
Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, lawyer quits, man has answered but is not present |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
ex |
F |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck |
|
Mackinnon C |
M |
E |
L |
L |
M.P. v. D.P., 2006 CanLII 15770 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Wife makes false sexual assualt allegations and man gets temporary supervised access, restored to unsupervised when allegations are dismissed, child exchanges at the police station |
|
Macleod |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Sanders v. Lacaille, 2005 CanLII 18722 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man accused of assault acquitted, no children, wife gets possession of home for 2 years and damages it when ordered to leave, wife given 40 K in constructive trust but must pay 14 K in damages and 14 K in occupation rent |
|
Manton |
M |
E |
M |
M |
D.Q. v. R.A., 2006 CanLII 42375 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.1 |
4.1 K for earlier motion, unemployed man imputed to 40 K |
|
Maranger |
M |
E |
sr |
sr |
Ainslie v. Bracken, 2006 CanLII 19461 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Mans income imputed from claimed K to 80 K, 10 K support arrears, 3.4 K per month total support |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Man in breach of several paymwent orders, pleadings struck, security ordered for appeal of striking order, uncontested trial ordered |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2120 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.5 |
Wifes motion for retroactive support, wife claims 44 K gets 6.5 K |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Kourany v. Salem,
2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Kourany v. Salem,
2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630
(ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.5 |
Interim motion, 7.5 K costs |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Meredith v. Meredith, 2002 CanLII 2807 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.8 |
Divorce action, divided success, wife gets 3.8 K |
|
Pedlar |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man under no contact order with one of his 3 children |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Campeau v. Campeau, 2006 CanLII 19430 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K for motion to have mans lawyer removed |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 15761 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.5 |
Wife claims 16.5 K and gets 8.5 K for motion |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Child support arrears and threat of bankruptcy, order to put pension in trust until equalization paid |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
Interim motion $ 750 costs |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Dunklin v. Dunklin,
2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Secure equalization against life insurance policy and make wife trustee of pension, retroactive child support |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Graff v. Graff, 2002 CanLII 2788 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.8 |
Interim motion, 3.8 K costs |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 38129 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Garnishment hearing, 4 K costs |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Freezes home and possessions impressed with a trust to benefit of wife. His mothers estate frozen and transferred to trust, garnisheed to 70 % income |
|
Power |
M |
E |
ex |
M |
Laiken v. Tatsambong, 2003 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Wife gets ex parte freezing order which is later overturned |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Martin v. Martin,
2004 CanLII 48712 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must hold at least 1 million dollars life insurance designated to wife for payments of 28 K per month in total support |
|
Power |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Martin v. Martin, 2005 CanLII 11809 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
49.0 |
Divorce action, wife asks 165 K and gets 49 K |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
sr |
McLean v. Vallance, 2006 CanLII 28910 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
Wife claims 4.9 K and gets 1 K |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
5 K security to bring motion, vexatious, frivoluos abusive litigator, 10 K cost penalty , variation not heard despite FRO default, security overturned on appeal |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Support variation, 10 K costs, 10 K costs of appeal |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on mans motion for variarion and access and constitutional challenges |
|
Power |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Townsend v. Florentis, 2004 CanLII 25801 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man prohibited from the city of Kingston, no access to child |
|
Roy |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
50.7 |
Divorce action, wife asks 61 K gets 50.7 K |
|
Roy |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
11.0 |
Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
Roy |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K costs for motions |
|
Roy |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
12 K arrears on house payments and 25 K costs to be secured against mans share of home |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
|
|
Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Contempt motion against man dismissed 1.5 K for motion |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion 3 K costs |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Default but FRO enforcement stayed and arrears reduced to 15 K from 44 |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
15 K advance to wife and 9.5 K in costs but answer not struck for failing to provide disclosure |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.5 |
Interim motion on support application wife didn’t pay costs of precious order, 7.5 K costs |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Stay of variation until man pays arrears, says he’s broke |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Provenzano v.
Provenzano, 2004 CanLII 5075 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Set aside, womans lawyer doesn’t tell of ex parte order, lawyer pays costs |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Interim motion 2 K costs |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton,
2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order against man, wife gets possession of home and cistody |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Lump sum of 45 K ordered in Que, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and Ont court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
45.0 |
Lump sum of 45 K ordered, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied |
|
Sedgwick |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Roberts v. Aasen, 2003 CanLII 2000 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
60.9 |
Custody and access 60.9 K award |
|
Sheffield |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K for interim motion |
|
Sheffield |
M |
E |
sr |
M |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Interim motion, 2 K costs |
|
Sheffield |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
9.0 |
Man claims 83 K income and is imputed to 92 K |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
L |
L |
Bourget v. Bourget,
2006 CanLII 2888 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
2.0 |
Mans income imputed upwards 2 K per year for overtime, minor |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Butler v. Poelstra, 2006 CanLII 41661 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.7 |
Divorce action, wife asks 16.3 K and gets 5.7 K costs |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Fournier v. Burton, 2006 CanLII 42370 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Husband loses motion to have support terminated, 4 K costs |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Francis v. Filion, 2003 CanLII 2423 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
40 K insurance policy as support |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Matysiak v. Phillips, 2004 CanLII 45449 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mans access terminated, first unsupervised, then supervised, then terminated, drug problem, criminal record |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
sr |
F |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.8 |
Motion to vary support, 5.8 K costs |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
F |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual, Wife gets home for 2 years then sold, man gets 12 K bill on household payments, woman gets support |
|
Aitken |
F |
E |
sr |
sr |
TPS |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual, woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support, |
|
Blishen |
F |
E |
F |
F |
O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2007 CanLII 8930 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Motion to vary support, husband claims 19.8 K and gets 5 K, wife claims 8.4 K |
|
DeSousa |
F |
E |
F |
F |
A.D. v. M.J., 2006 CanLII 37515 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
Motion, wife found in contempt, 8 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
F |
F |
Ladisa v. Ladisa, 2004 CanLII 15138 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.0 |
Divorce action, wife claims 35 K costs, husband claims 28 K and gets 10 K, appeal dismissed |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife get custody |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2003 CanLII 1995 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
20K costs, 8.8 K costs of appeal |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
M |
F |
Sloss v. Forget, 2005 CanLII 4843 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Motion for mobility and support, 6 K costs |
|
De Sousa |
F |
E |
F |
M |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 11238 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.0 |
Support trial, 7 K costs |
|
Mackinnon |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Found in contempt for failure to sell house but not in contempt for not admitting child was not in school and collecting support, sentencing hearing to be held |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
F |
B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
F |
B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
D.W. v. C.O, 2006 CanLII 16361 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Child support application, 3 K costs |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
F |
M |
D.W. v. C.O., 2006 CanLII 13554 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
5.0 |
With a former income of 134 K and current declared income of 33 K given transitional imputation of 38 K then 62 K |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
sr |
M |
Griffore v. Adsett, 2001 CanLII 28207 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Man gets exclusive possession and $ 1000 child support and $ 700 spousal support |
|
Mackinnon J |
F |
E |
M |
M |
Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2005 CanLII 48697 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.8 |
Motion to vary support, husband gets 4.8 K |
|
Polowin |
F |
E |
M |
ex |
Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
St |
|
Woman who didn’t answers has pleadings struck, but decision is overturned |
|
Belch |
M |
E |
M |
F |
Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
50.0 |
Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild |
|
Charboneau |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Guénette v. Brisebois, 2004 CanLII 33294 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
Husband gets interim custody, divided success, 3 motions 1 K costs to be paid by wife |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Charron v. Fulham, 2004 CanLII 17656 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
4.5 K costs on child support variation |
|
Hackland |
M |
E |
M |
M |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
25.0 |
Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
ex |
Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Pleadings struck then set aside, suit with lawyers |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
ex |
Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
46.0 |
46 K for uncontested divorce action, set aside |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
ex |
Campeau v. Campeau,
2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Wife pleadings struck, sells property and husband files fraudulent conveyance action, sale reversed then order set aside |
|
Lalonde |
M |
E |
M |
F |
D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody |
|
Panet |
M |
E |
F |
M |
Nicholls v. Peterson, 2007 CanLII 43497 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.3 |
$1,250 for uncontested trial, womans pleadings struck, 2 other $ 500 cost penalties |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Contempt motion for disclosure dismissed, 1.5 K costs |
|
Rutherford |
M |
E |
M |
M |
Marks v. Tokarewicz,
2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Denied motion for support due to default on costs, overturned and her motion may proceed |
|
Smith R |
M |
E |
M |
sr |
Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
70.0 |
70 K costs against wife |