Superior Court Penalties

Regions and Judges of Ontario

Northeastern Ontario Judicial Region Summary

Peter Karl Roscoe

Nov 2008

North East Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Nw – North East Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Gauthier	F	Ne	13	4	6	1	5	0	2	0
Hennessy	F	Ne	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Pardu	F	Ne	7	4	6	4	0	0	0	0
Boissonneault	M	Ne	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Del Frate	M	Ne	1	1	0	0	2	1	1	1
Karam	M	Ne	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Loukidelis	M	Ne	6	2	5	2	2	0	0	0
O’Neill	M	Ne	15	2	11	1	1	0	0	0
Riopelle	M	Ne	7	6	4	3	1	0	0	0
Rivard	M	Ne	6	4	3	3	1	0	1	0
Whalen	M	Ne	7	3	5	1	3	0	2	0

Female Judges	3	22	8	13	5	5	0	2	0
Male judges	8	44	19	30	11	11	1	4	1
Total	11	66	27	43	16	16	1	6	1

Northeast Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 0

N = 7 Mean = 354.2 Total = 2479.4

1.400 7.000 7.300 9.000 25.00 30.00 2400

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 13 Mean = 31.4 Total = 174.2

6.200 8.000 10.00 12.00 15.00 16.00 17.40 29.00 35.00 35.00 50.00 60.00 115.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 15 Mean = 31.7 Total = 475.5

0.8000 1.000 1.300 1.500 1.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 8.000 9.300 10.00 15.00 18.00 28.00 370.0

Female Cost Penalties

N = 5 Mean = 50.3 Total = 251.5

2.500 3.000 7.500 27.50 211.0

Northeast Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.0	8 K costs for July 2001 motion to vary support of 2.6 K per month and wifes denied motion to strike pleadings
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	10.0	Mans income is imputed an extra 10 K, wifes income imputed 40 K, offset child support , man must pay 1.5 K spousal support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man violates freezing order, house and half pension vested to wife
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 14 K prejudgment interest
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must designate wife as beneficiary of life insurance and provide health insurance, 2.2 K per month total support
Gauthier	F	Ne	L	L	Blake v. Blake, 2000 CanLII 22528 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Minutes of settlement set aside because man defaults on providing financial information, provincial court order overturned and 13 K retroactive arrears
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house and custody
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	M	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	8.0	Man claims 12 K income imputed to 20 K
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Judge imposes supervised access when man says he’s too upset for trial, removed after trial despite wifes request
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wifes motion for exclusive possession of the family home allowed, non depletion order, spousal and child support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Loiselle v. Loiselle, 2000 CanLII 22461 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate his 135 K insurance policy to wife, 1.5 K per month support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	McLean v. McLean, 2003 CanLII 2044 (ON SC)	mj	L	25.0	20 K US lump sum from separation agreement paid, separation agreement then ruled invalid
Hennessy	F	Ne	M	F	Pestell v. Krystia, 2003 CanLII 2045 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	12.0	Man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 90 K, retroactive arrears, leave to appeal denied
Hennessy	F	Ne	M	F	Young v. Young, 2003 CanLII 47887 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man gets 3 years for assault, his access and grandparents access denied
Pardu	F	Ne	L	L	Booth v. Booth, 2002 CanLII 49529 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	1.4	1.4 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, child formerly declared adult has support reinstated
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	M	Goudie v. Stapleford, 2004 CanLII 20297 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Spousal support obligation secured against property, separation agreement not to pay support overturned
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	M	Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year, wife earns 44.3 K
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	sr	Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	17.4	Man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K, intentionally unemployed, arrears not rescinded
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	sr	Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Property charged for default on child support, no recission of arrears, bad faith , imputed income, intentionally unermployed
Pardu	F	Ne	F	M	Walker v. Rutledge, 2003 CanLII 2358 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.0	Divorce action, 18 K costs
Pardu	F	Ne	M	M	Wamsley v. Moore, 2003 CanLII 2269 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Pleadings to be struck unless he pays 25.6 K to FRO immediately, contempt motion abandoned
Boissonneault	M	Ne	ex	F	Masotti v. Masotti, 2002 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Unopposed support motion because husband is in default
Del Frate	M	Ne	ex	F	O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8369 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Mans income imputed to 68 K, retroactive arrears
Karam	M	Ne	l	F	Scalabrini v. Scalabrini, 2003 CanLII 18778 (ON S.C.	mj	L	7.0	7 K lump sum to settle spousal support, does not invalidate further claims
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Mans stock account and motorcycle transferred to wife to be sold for arrears, 4.2 K per month total support, imputed income
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	115.0	Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, arrears, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	10 K costs and GST
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest on 15 K equalization payment
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	F	Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Unemployed man imputed to 35 K per year income, 2.8 K per month total support
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Dwyer v. Dwyer, 2005 CanLII 5852 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.3	9.3 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Agresti v. Hatcher, 2004 CanLII 8311 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	28.0	28 K to pay ex wifes pretrial costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of home Sept 2001
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	F	Borden v. Racicot, 2003 CanLII 2065 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.3	Interim motion, 1.3 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jail threatened, security deposit, unemployed imputed income, denied access to children, costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K per year
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Man on disability for 2.5 K per year imputed to 18.5 K, 32 K support arrears reduced to 21
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Guido v. Guido, 2004 CanLII 15033 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession, husband must pay $ 850 child support and $ 866 spousal support
O’Neill	M	Ne	L	L	Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2129 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	6.2	Man claims 21.7 K income and is imputed to 27.9 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	F	Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2130 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Trial of support, wife claims 43 K gets 3.5 K, husband also claims over 40 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill	M	Ne	sr	M	Rose v. Rose, 2004 CanLII 17755 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Application to vary custody and support dismissed, 3.5 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K , joint custody, $ 361 per month offset child support
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Sovereign v. Sovereign, 2004 CanLII 5087 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife alleges assault and moves to shelter violating court order, wife gets custody
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Apr 2000 motion setting support at 2.6 K per month, 1.5 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Previous non harassment order changed to 1500 feet from residence
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Leave from work constitutes underemployment, 15 K added to years income, 7 K lump spousal support
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	M	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	7.3	7.3 K lump sum for arrears of spousal support, transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, a lien on his motorcycle, 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	M	F	Chertow v. Chertow, 2001 CanLII 4238 (ON C.A.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment of settlement agreement, upheld on appeal
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Low court award of 10 K costs overturned and 1.5 K costs instead
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	0.8 K costs of interim motion, ex parte default with 12.5 K cost penalty and 4 K security for costs eventually set aside
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	370.0	80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Mans pleadings struck, mans transfer of assets ruled a fraudulent conveyance and transferred to wife, 80 K repayment of funds taken, 40 K damages for fraud and 25 K punitive damages
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	F	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	2400.0	Lump sum 2.4 million, man declares bankruptcy, 95 K support arrears and 65 K damage deposit survives bankruptcy, previous 10 K lump sum
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	M	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	M	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Lien on property to secure support and eqalization, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	L	L	Dorthee v. Bekintis, 2004 CanLII 44989 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	9.0	9 K lump sum for settlement of spousal support obligations, and 1 year $ 750 per month
Whalen	M	Ne	M	F	Principe v. Principe, 2000 CanLII 22439 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wifes 5 year exclusive possession of the home continued, sheriffs sale stayed
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	L	Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	29.0	Mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for 2 years on welfare

2) Penalties Against Women

Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		5 K to be paid to husband for chilrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security, second time woman has been found in contempt
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Wife is unemployed and imputed to 40 K per year, offset child support, man must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		5 K to be paid to husband for childrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Del Frate	M	Ne	M	M	Ansara v. Ansara, 2007 CanLII 6235 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion on acces and support, 3 K costs deferred to trial
Del Frate	M	Ne	F	sr	Levesque v. Little, 2007 CanLII 1910 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	27.5	Divorce action, husband asks 53.2 K and gets 27.5 K
Karam	M	Ne	M	M	Gabel v. Gabel, 2003 CanLII 48307 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Wife in default’s pleadings closed, order set aside on appeal, wife gets 12 K costs
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	15.0	Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Borsos v. Borsos, 2006 CanLII 31201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.5	Divorce action, husband asks 47.1 K and gets 7.5 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	36.0	Woman imputed at full income of 36 K after quitting her job for 6 months, then at half income for 6 months, then back to full as incentive, reduces support she’s owed to $360 per month, minor
Riopelle	M	Ne	M	F	Chertow v. Chertow, 2005 CanLII 35478 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs of motion to vary support, recalculation leaves father 38 K arrears
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Wife claims 15 K income and is imputed to 35 K
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	211.0	Divorce action, 5 ½ years to get to trial, 211 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		48 K in prejudgment interest on condo rents, spousal support claim denied