Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Northwestern
Ontario Judicial Region Summary
Nov 2008
North
West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties
Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Nw – North West Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of
penalties to self represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
|
23 |
13 |
|
14 |
10 |
|
|
8 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
Kozak |
M |
Nw |
|
4 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
|
14 |
10 |
|
10 |
8 |
|
|
8 |
4 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
|
7 |
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
3 |
|
3 |
3 |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
|
14 |
6 |
|
7 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
|
13 |
3 |
|
8 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
|
7 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
|
12 |
3 |
|
7 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
|
3 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Female Judges |
1 |
|
|
23 |
13 |
|
14 |
10 |
|
|
8 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
Male judges |
9 |
|
|
77 |
32 |
|
39 |
17 |
|
|
25 |
8 |
|
9 |
5 |
|
Total |
10 |
|
|
100 |
45 |
|
53 |
27 |
|
|
33 |
9 |
|
12 |
6 |
Northwest
Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums
missing 0
N = 8 Mean =
47.6 Total = 380
0.8000 2.500 5.500 6.000 36.00 50.00 80.00 200.0
Male Imputed Income missing 0
N = 9 Mean =
20.9 Total = 188.5
1.500 2.800 11.00 12.00 21.00 26.00 30.20 40.00 44.00
Male Cost Penalties
N = 26 Mean =
12.1 Total = 313.4
0.9000 1.200 1.500 2.000 2.300 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.500 5.000 5.500 5.800 6.000 6.000 6.600 8.500 8.800 9.000 9.000 12.00 20.00 31.00 31.40 36.40 39.50 51.00
Female Cost Penalties
N = 14 Mean =
13.6 Total = 190.4
0.2000 0.3000 0.5000 1.500 1.500 1.500 3.000 4.000 4.200 4.200 27.50 28.00 47.00 67.00
Northwest
Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Vesting order of mans half of the family home as security for equalization, man claims he is facing bankruptcy, life insurance policy to be designated as security for support |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Curle v. Lowe, 2004 CanLII 22947 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans claim for damages against common law wife for denial of access dismissed |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2147 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
39.5 |
Divorce action, wife claims 61 K gets 39.5 |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
L |
Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2148 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Husband defaults on 5.5 K of financial provisions of interim order and 5.8 K support arrears, vesting order that half his CN pension is transferred to wife |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive interim possession of home and custody and 2 K total support per month and 1.2 K per month expenses |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
F |
M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
31.4 |
Divorce action, 31.4 K costs |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
F |
M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife awarded prejudgment interest, 3 years on 55 K equalization |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
F |
M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Permanent restraining order for harassing wife, 5 K bond on restraining order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
F |
M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Husband must designate wife beneficiary of life insurance, husband does not appear at trial, 5 K security on restraining order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
L |
Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 49531 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
6 K lump s.7 expenses, 5 K for money taken from trust and retroactive support plus interest, default causing uncontested trial, default later set aside on consent |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
L |
Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 49531 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
6.0 |
6 K lump s.7 expenses, 5 K for money taken from trust and retroactive support plus interest, default causing uncontested trial, default later set aside on consent |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Straight v. Straight, 2004 CanLII 7046 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
12.0 |
Man declares 58 K imputed to 70 K per year, court declines to impute wife, man pays 1 K spousal support |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente,
2004 CanLII 48680 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Wife gets preservation order for bank accounts and combines fraudulent conveyance action with divorce |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente,
2004 CanLII 48680 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Security of 25 K to be posted by husband for violating court orders |
|
Kozack |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Eloranta v. Eloranta, 2002 CanLII 2710 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Equalization payment secured by second mortgage, must get life insurance policy sufficient to cover support obligations |
|
Kozak |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 2344 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
36.0 |
36 K lump sum and additional 19 K equalization in ammended agreement after 206 K equalization, third variation not allowed |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of sexual assault on daughter, access terminated |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Almgren v. Almgren, 2006 CanLII 7502 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.0 |
Divorce action, all that was left for trial was support, wife asks 18.6 and gets 12 K |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2004 CanLII 18436 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, man must pay $ 1206 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 7504 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
26.0 |
26 K per year imputed to husband from his share of house, 40 K claimed imputed to 66 K |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 7504 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, undefended trial, 31 K costs |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 8876 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
31.0 |
Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, wife asks 45.5 K and gets 31 K |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Dustin v. Dustin, 2003 CanLII 2106 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default causing ex patre trial, though present he could not participate |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Dustin v. Dustin, 2003 CanLII 2106 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, $ 394 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support, house was husbands family home and his mother holds the mortgage |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
Smith-Remus v. Remus, 2005 CanLII 51261 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.2 |
Man claims 5.8 K income and is imputed to 36 K, wifes support obligation is cancelled |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, 2003 CanLII 2252 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man is accused of gambling problem, non dissipation order, restraining order |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Willan v. Burdette, 2005 CanLII 51262 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Transitional supervised access, unsupervised ordered after period of supervision |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente, 2003 CanLII 1985 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
45 days in jail unless he purges contempt and pays order and makes financial disclosure |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 23928 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, non depletion, 1.7 K per month child support |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 23928 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, non depletion, 1.7 K per month child support |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
21.0 |
Unemployed man imputed to 21 K per year income, no access to kids ordered |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Gray v. Gray, 2006 CanLII 28736 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Man does not appear and summary judgement is given to wife, uncontested trial |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim possession of family home, 2 oldest children live with father, non depletion order, $ 850 spousal support, $ 435 child support, retroactive arrears |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Wife gets interim possession of family home, 2 oldest children live with father, non depletion order, $ 850 spousal support, $ 435 child support, retroactive arrears |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets order for interim exclusive possession and man must pay mortgage arrears |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Dafoe v. Dafoe, 2005 CanLII 19821 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, man had custody but joint custody and residence with mother in another city ordered |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
DeCicco v. DeCicco, 2003 CanLII 2094 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
Divorce action 20 K costs |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
sr |
L |
Prosser-Blake v. Blake, 2007 CanLII 10414 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Sept 2005 non harassment order, supervised access, answer struck, uncontested trial, man imprisoned for assault. |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Skramrud v. Skramrud, 2007 CanLII 51173 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.0 |
2.5 K spousal per month, $ 400 child support, lump sum of 90 K, man is imputed to former 81 K pay from actual 28 K for taking voluntary retirement, 9 K costs |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson,
2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man on welfare and living at YMCA is imputed to 80 K lump sum and contempted when he doesn’t pay, intentionally unemployed, imputed to 40 K per year |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
80.0 |
Lump sum of 80 K for support, imputed income, intentionally unemployed |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Husband removed by police and restricted, mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 80 K lump sum payment, vesting of house, wife gets custody |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
House and bank account vested to secure 80 K lump sum support and 40 K equalization, man on welfare denied support, income imputed |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Tishbi v. Shemesh, 2005 CanLII 3383 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
51.0 |
51 K and GST for divorce action |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Tishbi v. Shemesh, 2005 CanLII 3383 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
200.0 |
200 K lump sum covering all claims |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Arella v. Scobak, 2003 CanLII 2460 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
50.0 |
50 K lump sum for unjust enrichment, arrears not varied, wife seeks imprisonment, not found in contempt |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order against man, 2 breaches, contempt and 5 days imprisonment for the first |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with sexual assault, acquitted but wife wins civil damages 10 K, wife gets custody, Man in arrears gets variation |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Matta v. Smith, 2002 CanLII 49536 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 400 K for unjust enrichment claim |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Stajkowski v. Stajkowski, 2004 CanLII 26185 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order against man |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Stajkowski v. Stajkowski, 2004 CanLII 26185 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order restraining man from interfering with mother and children |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente, 2005 CanLII 41388 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 31.5 K prejudgment interest |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19842 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, wife claims abuse, wife gets custody, limited supervised access, Childrens Aid requests anger management course, 143 K from equalization held in trust for wife, 4.5 K costs |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19844 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic assault, no access to children for 1 ˝ years prior to trial, transitional supervised access ordered |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
5.5 |
5.5 K lump extraordinary child expenses, vesting order on home to wife |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Kimpton v. Kimpton,
2003 CanLII 2148 (ON S.C. |
mn |
Sc |
|
Secure support with life insurance policy, vesting order that half his CN pension is transferred to wife |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Korczynski v. Korczynski, 2007 CanLII 16631 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
9.0 |
Divorce action, wife claims 32.3 K and gets 9 K, man gets supervised access |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
ex |
M |
Kreft v. Mezo,
2006 CanLII 14412 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Wife gets ex parte freezing order, order is set aside |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual freezing order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lord v. Haner-Lord, 2003 CanLII 2174 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion for access, husband more successful but wife in weaker financial situation wife asks for 4.6 K and gets 3 K, husband asks for 5.6 K |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
F |
F |
Palinka v Palinka,
2003 CanLII 2195 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
500 K life insurance policy as security, denied 15 K interim disbursement and refraining order, 2.5 K spousal support |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
M |
Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
11.0 |
Man imputed from 115 K to 126 K |
|
Kozack |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Eloranta v. Eloranta, 2002 CanLII 2710 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Unsupervised access for 7 years then supervised access for guns and alcohol, breach of order, wife requests supervised but unsupervised restored, contempt sentence suspended but must sign undertaking not to breach |
|
Kozak |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 2667 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.2 |
1.2 K for default set aside on consent |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs of motion |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Neil v. Neil, 2002 CanLII 2644 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim order for exclusive possession but vacates it and it is sold |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Costs of motion 6 K to be offset against 11 K cost penalties against wife and 5.7 K interest, wife gets interim retroactive spousal support of 0.8 K per month |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 2006 CanLII 24337 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy as security |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
L |
L |
Niemi v. Niemi, 2006 CanLII 24341 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy as security |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Patkau v. Patkau,
2005 CanLII 49673 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must make children beneficiaries of insurance until support obligation ends, minor |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, 2003 CanLII 2252 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Granted due to controlling intrusive conduct of man, non dissipation order due to gambling |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2006 CanLII 28731 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
8.5 |
Divorce action, wife gets 8.5 K |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2007 CanLII 16624 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Husband makes failed motion for contempt, 3.5 K costs |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Wife makes sexual assault allegations, man gets custody, wife is not present at trial and her case is dismissed, wife must have supervised access |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 16639 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
8.8 |
Trial of support, wife asks 9.8 K costs and gets 8.8 K |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Topetto v. Topetto, 2003 CanLII 1984 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Divorce action primarily negotiated between parties, wife asks 9.4 K gets 5 K |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente, 2003 CanLII 1985 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
4.5 K costs of contempt motion |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 26161 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Wife gets 3 K on interim motion, asks for 6 K |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
F |
Gray v. Gray, 2006 CanLII 28736 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
5.5 K costs for uncontested divorce action |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
sr |
L |
Lehtomaa v. Lehtomaa, 2006 CanLII 34439 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of workplace survivor benefits |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Pollock v. Pollock,
2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
2.5 |
Man pays lump sum of 2.5 K for interim support |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.3 |
Interim motion on sale of home,wife asks 4.5 K and gets 2.3 K, husband asks 5.7 K |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Home ordered sold and money from sale ordered held as security, contempt motion dismissed |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Smylie v. Smylie, 2006 CanLII 39471 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate children as beneficiaries of 125 K life insurance policy |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, man gets interim custody and wife supervised access |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Norland v. Norland, 2007 CanLII 20786 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.6 |
Wife gets 6.6 K costs for interim motion |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
F |
sr |
St. James v. St. James, 2006 CanLII 31618 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must maintain an 150 K insurance policy |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Thompson v. Thompson, 2003 CanLII 2258 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
2.8 |
Mans income is imputed from 19.7 K to 22.5 K, spousal support increased from ).1 K per month to 0.3 K, child support wife must pay is reduced |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.8 |
5.8 K costs for motion to vary support |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Bacskai v. Bacskai, 2006 CanLII 44260 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion for summary judgment dismissed 1.5 K costs |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
6 K total costs of multiple issues and motions |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Jaszczyszak v. Jaszczyszak, 2003 CanLII 2318 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession for 8 years and husband gets 15 K occupation rent |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Kemble v. Roy, 2006 CanLII 23937 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate with as beneficiary of insurance policy, interim spousal support of 1.2 K per month |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Krebs v. Yarmel, 2003 CanLII 2325 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Father must name children as beneficiaries of life insurance policy, minor |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
0.8 |
$ 800 lump sum for occupational rent not excluded from his bankruptcy |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
36.4 |
Divorce action 36.4 Kcosts |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
sr |
Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
1.5 |
Man imputed from 9 K to 10.5 K. Wife pays him net child support, mild |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
sr |
Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must keep 250 K insurance policies, also safety deposit box kept containing bonds |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
sr |
M |
Valente v. Valente, 2005 CanLII 41388 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.9 |
Wife gets 0.9 K costs |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Smylie v. Smylie, 2006 CanLII 39471 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
44.0 |
Man intentionally unemployed for quitting job and is imputed to 44 K, order later retroactively rescinded by Shaw J |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
M |
Anderson v. Sitch, 2004 CanLII 36067 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Woman in default of support is granted a restraining order to retain drivers license but denied injuction to prevent notification of credit bureaus |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
M |
Gillett v. Smyth, 2002 CanLII 2786 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
73.0 |
Womans projected income of 81 K imputed to average 154 K, 4.8 K per month total support, husband has custody of the 4 children |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
M |
Gillett v. Smyth, 2002 CanLII 2786 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
5.0 |
Wife to pay 5 K lump for arrears, 4.8 K per month in total support |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
F |
M |
Jellison v. Jellison, 2003 CanLII 2319 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Man gets exclusive possession of home if he pays the costs, then home is ordered sold |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
M |
Kuluski v. Adams, 2002 CanLII 2684 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.2 |
Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, 4.2 K |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual freezing order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
F |
Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order |
|
Pierce |
F |
Nw |
M |
ex |
Leonard v. Carlson, 2006 CanLII 3480 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Husband gets ex parte order to stop wife from taking child to US where she lives |
|
Kozack |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 2344 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Womans motion to overturn separation agreement for support and equalization is dismissed, wife already got equalization and 36 K support lump sum, overturned on appeal and she gets 16.5 K costs |
|
Kurisko |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K for interim support motion withdrawn |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
L |
L |
B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining or that wife can not go back to family home, wife violates order |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Goeldner v. Goeldner, 2004 CanLII 14348 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
47.0 |
Divorce action no children, costs 47 K plus 2.6 K prejudgment interest, changed to 20 K costs on appeal |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Goeldner v. Goeldner, 2004 CanLII 14348 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Divorce action no children, costs 47 K plus 2.6 K prejudgment interest |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Hensel v. Hensel, 2006 CanLII 40672 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion for daycare, 1.5 K costs |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
sr |
Jones v. Cole, 2007 CanLII 21956 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
28.0 |
Wifes motion to vary support fails, husband asks for 76 K and gets 28 K |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
M |
ex |
McEvoy v. McEvoy, 2003 CanLII 2178 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Woman doesn’t attend trial and her pleadings are struck |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
M |
ex |
McEvoy v. McEvoy, 2003 CanLII 2178 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
3 K costs for striking motion |
|
McCartney |
M |
Nw |
F |
sr |
St. James v. St. James, 2006 CanLII 31618 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.5 |
Interim motion for freezing order dismissed, 0.5 K costs |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
M |
sr |
Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
67.0 |
Divorce action, wife makes fraud claim, husband asks 102 K gets 67 K |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 21777 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
27.5 |
Husband claims 50 K for divorce and gets 27.5 K, wife claims 91 K |
|
Platana |
M |
Nw |
sr |
sr |
L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Doesn’t appear at trial, was already on supervised access, supervised access continued. |
|
Shaw |
M |
Nw |
M |
F |
Petit v. Petit, 2007 CanLII 20789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
4.0 K for withdrawn motion |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Man gets interim interim custody with adult supervision for wife who he alleges does drugs |
|
Smith GP |
M |
Mw |
F |
M |
Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 80 K lump sum payment, vesting of house |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Gale v. Gale, 2006 CanLII 21781 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Wifes motion for sale of cottage dismissed by summary judgement, upheld on appeal |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Gale v. Gale, 2006 CanLII 40788 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.2 |
Interim motions in 3 courts, 4.2 K total |
|
Stach |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Krolyk v. Krolyk,
2005 CanLII 15478 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
10.5 |
Imputed income of 10.5 K to wife lowers her spousal support to 1.85 K per month, Wife gets house transferred to her and will get part of mans pension on realization, minor |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Braga v. Braga, 2006 CanLII 28732 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Man gets 2.6 K prejudgment interest |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
sr |
Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must keep 250 K insurance policies, also safety deposit box kept containing bonds |
|
Wright |
M |
Nw |
M |
M |
Willson v. Willson, 2003 CanLII 2274 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs for motion withdrawn if wife turns out entitled to interim support and 3.5 K costs if she wasn’t |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
F |
M |
Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.3 |
0.3 K costs for interim motion |
|
Zelinski |
M |
Nw |
L |
L |
White v. Richardson, 2005 CanLII 34818 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.2 |
Wife is under a 0.2 K cost order |