Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Toronto Ontario Judicial Region
Summary
Nov 2008
Toronto
Region Penalties and Cost Penalties
Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region T – Toronto Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of
penalties to self represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
|
18 |
6 |
|
17 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Bain |
F |
T |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Beaulieu |
F |
T |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
|
9 |
3 |
|
7 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
|
10 |
4 |
|
6 |
2 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
|
5 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
|
29 |
11 |
|
22 |
9 |
|
|
4 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
|
9 |
2 |
|
5 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
|
9 |
4 |
|
7 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
|
12 |
2 |
|
10 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
|
9 |
1 |
|
7 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Klowak |
F |
T |
|
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
|
7 |
0 |
|
6 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Low |
F |
T |
|
7 |
4 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
|
14 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
McWatt |
F |
T |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
|
16 |
2 |
|
14 |
2 |
|
|
7 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Pepall |
F |
T |
|
4 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
|
17 |
3 |
|
12 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Speigel |
F |
T |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
|
12 |
2 |
|
10 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Swinton |
F |
T |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Young |
F |
T |
|
3 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Thorburn |
F |
T |
|
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Archibald |
M |
T |
|
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
|
18 |
4 |
|
12 |
2 |
|
|
5 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Belobaba |
M |
T |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
|
5 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
|
6 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Czurtin |
M |
T |
|
3 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Day |
M |
T |
|
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Ferrier |
M |
T |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Grossi |
M |
T |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
|
5 |
4 |
|
5 |
4 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
|
6 |
5 |
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Jennings |
M |
T |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Keenan |
M |
T |
|
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
OConnell |
M |
T |
|
6 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
|
10 |
2 |
|
9 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Spence |
M |
T |
|
4 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Female Judges |
24 |
|
|
203 |
50 |
|
155 |
39 |
|
|
30 |
7 |
|
9 |
4 |
|
Male judges |
16 |
|
|
73 |
22 |
|
54 |
17 |
|
|
7 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Total |
40 |
|
|
276 |
72 |
|
209 |
56 |
|
|
37 |
10 |
|
11 |
6 |
Toronto
Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums missing
2
N = 22 Mean =
82.1 Total = 1806.8
1.800 5.000 12.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 26.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 43.00 50.00 57.00 57.00 93.00 101.0 180.0 200.0 350.0 447.0
Male Imputed Income missing 5
N = 51 Mean =
215.6 Total = 10995.6
4.000 8.000 11.00 12.00 14.00 15.00 18.00 21.00 23.00 28.00 28.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 33.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 46.00 46.00 48.00 49.00 49.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 55.00 55.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 60.00 60.00 61.00 68.00 77.00 77.00 79.00 87.00 100.0 155.0 170.0 190.0 250.0 305.0 309.0 1120. 1900. 4755
Male Cost Penalties
N = 69 Mean =
49.9 Total = 3592.8
1.000 1.000 1.000 1.100 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 3.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 6.200 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.500 7.500 10.00 10.80 12.00 12.50 12.50 13.50 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.80 16.50 17.00 17.80 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 33.80 34.00 35.00 42.00 45.00 56.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 85.80 93.00 200.0 2250
Female Cost Penalties
N = 13 Mean =
10.4 Total = 135.5
1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 3.500 3.500 4.000 4.250 5.500 8.000 18.00 25.00 56.00
Toronto
Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income or cost penalty ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
|
|
T |
sr |
M |
Fantin v.
Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Man found in contempt purges it by providing some documents ordered |
|
|
|
T |
F |
M |
Kucyi v. Kucyi, 2007 ONCA 758 (CanLII) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
$ 1709 per month child support and $ 2700 per month spousal support, appeal dismissed and new arbitration award to be made, 47 K arrears, 20 K costs |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Allaire v. Allaire, 2003 CanLII 26263 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
L |
35.0 |
35 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, upheld on appeal |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ballentine v. Ballentine, 2001 CanLII 28151 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.5 |
7.5 K costs for dismissed motion to vary support, man declared a vextacious litigant, 307 K arrears, 6.2 K costs of appeal |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
|
Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII) |
mj |
C |
|
2 months in jail for failure to pay security and dissipating assets, appeal dismissed |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Debora v. Debora,
2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Order freezing some of mans assets continued |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Debora v. Debora,
2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
4755.0 |
Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
2250.0 |
Wife asks for 2.6 million and gets 2.25 million for divorce |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 2.4 million prejudgment interest |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2003 CanLII 2190 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
18 K from proceeds of home to be paid into court as security |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Security for 105 K equalization as a mortgage, husbands share of family home transferred to wife. |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K costs for motion to change support |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
LeVan v. LeVan, 2006 CanLII 31020 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
170.0 |
Man claims a maximum of 200 K income and is imputed to 370 K, separation agreement reopened and equalization redone due to incomplete disclosure |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Malerba v. Malerba,
2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
10 K costs |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non dissapation order |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
L |
F |
Nordin v. Joslin, 2005 CanLII 14004 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
6.2 |
6.2 K for support reduction motion and 5 K for appeal |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2367 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must post 10 K security, appeal dismissed |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive interim possession, $ 1325 in child support and spousal support per month |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Tannahill v.
Tannahill, 2005 CanLII 51025 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default leads to 30 K lump sum order, denied appeal |
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.5 |
Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal |
|
Bain |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Demarchi v. Selwyn, 2002 CanLII 2722 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
93.0 |
93 K lump sum made credited towards monthly payments |
|
Bain |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
DeMarco v. DeMarco, 2005 CanLII 6389 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order |
|
Beaulieu |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
42.0 |
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs |
|
Beaulieu |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Cutaia-Mahler v. Mahler, 2001 CanLII 28138 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K for motion to vary support |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Davis v. Nusca, 2003 CanLII 2301 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs for motion, leave to appeal denied, mother move to Sweden with children in interim |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Evans v. Gravely, 2000 CanLII 22593 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
23.0 |
Man claims 17 K taxablre income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
20 K costs and interest |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
14.0 |
14 K lump sum retroactive support and prejudgment interest |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
14 K lump sum retroactive support and pre judgment interest |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007 |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007 |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
|
|
Stanghi v. Stanghi, 2001 CanLII 5784 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims no income and is imputed to 40 K, variation denied, appeal dismissed with costs |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
sr |
|
Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
1 K costs of motion |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
sr |
|
Hartman 2005 |
mj |
Ip |
|
|
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Murray v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 30304 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets retroactive support and prejudgment interest and costs, overturned on appeal |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Parker v. Parker, 2004 CanLII 14179 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Interim motion for custody and support, wife gets 5 K |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Riel v. Holland,
2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
77.0 |
3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order over home and cottage as security for support |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
L |
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
20 K security with court for compliance with order, wife says husband abused her, gets sole custody to move to Japan |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON SC) |
mj |
L |
43.0 |
Lump of 43 K for past arrears of 80 K, alienated from son who won’t see him, must get life insurance designated to son until son turns 27 |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Nolan v. MacLean, 2006 CanLII 38865 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Reid v. Saliba,
2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default on support, payment as a lump sum with interest |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
57.0 |
Man must rollover 57 K of pension in lump sum to wife |
|
Goodman |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Rose v. Rose,
2005 CanLII 46401 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
May not encumber deplete or sell business |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
51.0 |
Man is unemployed, imputed to 51 K per year |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Proceeds from sale of home ordered as security for support |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Brans v. Brans, 2000 CanLII 22471 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
250.0 |
Man claims maximum income of 200 K and is imputed to 450 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Man must transfer second taxi license to wife and lease it off her to continue employment, wife already got the first taxi license for equalization, FRO moves to take away his license |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
15.0 |
Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 30 K, home transferred to wife, both his taxi licenses, man hasn’t seen his children in 10 years, 100 K life insurance for security, 22 K arrears, unstated costs |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
100 K life insurance policy to secure support |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Man with 10 K income claimed intentionally unemployed and imputed to 40 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must post 3 million to court as security for wifes claims |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
58.0 |
Man and wife imputed, man claims 88 K and is imputed to 146 K, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 CanLII 15236 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must post 100 K security to court |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
sr |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
17.8 |
17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
sr |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, Man must go bankrupt to erase support interest, denied variation |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Huck v. Huck,
2004 CanLII 22079 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
46.0 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 20 K arrears, 43 K equalization, man claims 39 K income including 24 K loan and is imputed to 85 K, arrears 20.4 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
100 K insurance used as security for support |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Malerba v. Malerba,
2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man in contempt for bankruptcy, 180 K lump sum, spousal support from pension to wife |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Malerba v. Malerba,
2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
20 K costs for divorce action |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
180.0 |
180 K lump sum |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Malerba v. Malerba,
2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy to secure support, 180 K lump sum, bankruptcy, contempt |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
101 |
30 K lump sum support, an additional 71 K to be paid within 30 days.50 K interim disbursement, 35 K extraordinary expense, 8 K per month child support, interim motion |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Paech v. Paech,
2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man found in contempt for disclosure, 93 K cost penalty |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
93.0 |
Interim motion to determine support, wife asks 99 K gets 93 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
|
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
3.0 K costs for interim motion |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
|
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Selznick v. Selznick, 2002 CanLII 2778 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
60.0 |
5 K per month child support, 3.1 K s.7 expense, 6 K spousal support per month, 44 K retroactive arrears, man claims 300 K income and is imputed to 360 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
F |
Tu v. Tu, 2000 CanLII 22591 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife given minor prejudgment and post judgment interest on support arrears |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
34.0 |
Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal, 34 K for costs of uncontested trial |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
2.0 |
2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Adamson v. Steed, 2007 CanLII 1328 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
3 day trial, wife asks 47.5 K gets 20 K |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44265 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Motion, 2.5 K costs |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Davis v. Tangredi, 2006 CanLII 44269 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
5 million held frozen |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
F |
D'Costa v. D'Costa, 2005 CanLII 56207 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
13.5 |
Support variation, wife asks for 19.3 K and gets 13.5 K |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
L |
F |
Ferazzutti v. Ferazzutti, 2006 CanLII 44271 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
14.0 |
Man claims 33 K income and is imputed to 47 K |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
A large number of mans business deductions not allowed, man imputed to 422 K but claimed income not clearly stated |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
500 K life insurance while children still receive support |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
F |
F |
O'Reilly v. O'Reilly, 2006 CanLII 44279 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
4.0 |
Man consents to impution at 20 K but is imputed to 24 K, recieves $ 500 per month spousal support |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Tock v. Tock, 2006 CanLII 44281 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
4 K costs remaining owing, 450 K life insurance policy as long as he is obligated to pay support |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Lenz v. Broadhurst Main, 2004 CanLII 5059 (ON S.C |
mj |
L |
20.0 |
30 K lump sum payment reduced to 20 K, man sues his lawyers |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
55.0 |
Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
15.0 |
Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
F |
F |
Yue v. Earl-McIntyre, 2001 CanLII 28178 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment granted against man on access, no motions for a year, security, cost penalty reduced on appeal |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
sr |
m |
Campbell v. Szoke, 2003 CanLII 2291 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
8.0 |
Mans maximum income over 6 years is 16 K imputed to 24 K, man must pay 1.1 K per month in spousal support |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
M |
David v. McCain, 2006 CanLII 9302 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Interim motion for custody access, wife asks 20 K and gets 15 K, husband asks 40 K and gets increased access |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
F |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M.,
2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for assault, wife requests it be made permanent denied, wife makes 2 unsubstantiated complaints to Childrens Aid, third party child exchanges, wife asks for access to children terminated or limited, supervised access denied |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Fantin v.
Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man traded from stock account and lost money contrary to preservation order |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must pay funds from sale of condo into the court |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Fox v. Fox, 2006 CanLII 21065 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
85.8 |
Divorce action with a 10 day trial, wife asks 200 K gets 85.8 K |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Matanovic v. Matanovic, 2005 CanLII 47788 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
Interim motion, wife asks 10.3 K and gets 2.5 K |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2032 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
17.0 |
Support variaton, 17 K costs |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2183 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
55.0 |
55 K extra income imputed to man from RRSP’s |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Pinizzotto v. Pinizzotto, 2005 CanLII 34355 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
12.0 |
Man claims 63 K income and is imputed to 75 K |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
33.0 |
$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Daemi v. Morovati, 2003 CanLII 2092 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
31.0 |
Man is unemployed and is imputed to 31 K, variation denied, man declares bankruptcy |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Kolody Ardan v. Ardan, 2002 CanLII 2689 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
53.0 |
Man with previously variable income is unemployed, income imputed to 53 K, support arrears, lump sum payment |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
1.8 |
Lump sum of $ 1750 but 22 K in calculated arrears of support |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Percival v. Percival, 2000 CanLII 22517 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
100.0 |
Man claims 800 K after tax income and is imputed to 900 K, 8 K per month support, 40 K retroactive arrears |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Reyes v. Rollo, 2001 CanLII 28260 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife awarded prejudgment interest |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
|
M |
Sait v. Thorne, 2006 CanLII 44280 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
200.0 |
Over 200 K in costs, 188 K is support related and survives mans bankruptcy |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
35.0 |
Man claims his income at 25 K and court imputes at 60 K |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
F |
F |
Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
60.0 |
Man declares 24 K imputed to 84 K, retroactive arrears of support and s.7 expenses |
|
Kitely |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Ex parate restraining order, wife gets custody |
|
Klowak |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Sharf v. Sharf,
2004 CanLII 5765 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 15 K per month total support |
|
Klowak |
F |
T |
sr |
sr |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll,
2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man works out of home so cash flow may be more than reported, imputed to 30 K |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Man ordered in default, eventually set aside by Macdonald J |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
|
12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
87.0 |
Previous declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K, 5.6 K per month in total support |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 1931 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Man must comply with 10 K security order to receive trial judgment |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
O'Brien v. O'Brien,
2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
46.0 |
Man claims 35 K income and is imputed at 81 K |
|
Lax |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Rueter v. Rueter, 2002 CanLII 2733 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Adjourned motion to strike pleading for not paying interim support. Permission to combine suit for flipping assets |
|
Low |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
56.0 |
Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband |
|
Low |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Hartmann v. Frantel, 2004 CanLII 16317 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed |
|
Low |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
15 K security to make motion |
|
Low |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
5 K costs for motion |
|
Low |
F |
T |
L |
L |
L.L.B. v. D.A.,
2002 CanLII 2769 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Ex parte restraining order, then complaint to Childrens Aid gets second restraining order and access temporarily suspended, wife gets custody and is allowed to move to Manitoba |
|
Low |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
McGoey v. McGoey, 2003 CanLII 2179 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Maintain insurance policy in wifes name to secure support |
|
Low |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Ristimaki v. Cooper, 2004 CanLII 16074 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, man leaves country |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Aunger v. Aunger, 2004 CanLII 39015 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
200.0 |
200 K lump sum support, wife already got 2 lump payments of 42 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Aunger v. Aunger, 2005 CanLII 9665 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
33.8 |
33.8 K for trial |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Husband gets default of over 13 K in costs penalties set aside but gets cost penalty of 1.5 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of home by lying to the court and husband gets occupation rent |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
70.0 |
Divorce action, 70 K cost |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
F |
F |
Hamid v. Hamid, 2003 CanLII 2128 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, wife gets custody |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, 2003 CanLII 2145 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
18.0 |
Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 38 K, wife makes 42 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5876 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man under non dissipation order |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
57.0 |
57 K lump sum, must continue to pay 4.2 K per month support until lump sum is paid |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Nichele v. Nichele, 2003 CanLII 1901 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Preliminary hearing in motion to vary support order, 5 K costs, man is allowed to proceed |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Pantchevski v.
Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
49.0 |
Man claims 9 K income and is imputed to 58 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
70.0 |
Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
350.0 |
Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
W |
Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody |
|
McWatt |
F |
T |
M |
F |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
1900.0 |
Man quits job due to back problem, court rules intentionally unemployed and imputes income of 1.9 million per year |
|
McWatt |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs for interim motion |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
sr |
sr |
Brown v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 43896 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
33.0 |
Man earns 20 K or less and is imputed to 53 K, appeal dismissed |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Arrested for assault, he says she assaulted him, wife gets custody, 10 K per month total support, 116 K in arrears, freezing order |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
309.0 |
Man claims 90 K and is imputed to 399 K by arbitrator and award is made a court order, freezing order |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order against man continued |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
77.0 |
Man not working but imputed to 77 K per year, Man must pay 2.5 K per month total support, non depletion order |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Non depletion and trust account order continued for man until he repays about 180 K then his portion of the trust will be released., wifes funds released, marriage contract set aside, income imputed |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
F |
L |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
$ 1000 to wife and mans motion to vary may proceed |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Haroun v. Haroun, 2001 CanLII 28128 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
58.0 |
Man claims 172 K income and is imputed to 230 K., 6 K per month spousal support, 250 K advance on equalization already paid |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
sr |
m |
Herskovits v. Herskovits, 2001 CanLII 28233 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
30.0 |
30 K lump sum |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
sr |
sr |
Ingles v. Watt, 2003 CanLII 2136 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man given supervised access, wife must pay half the costs, wife refuses to pay and man gets no access |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
F |
F |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
58.0 |
Man unemployed and presents plan for new business. Asks income be imputed at 30 K but court imputes at 88 K |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Onogi v. Elguindi,
2005 CanLII 23686 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
26.0 |
2 voluntary lump sums of 22 K and 24 K, court orders 26 K lump sum, equalization of 485 K and support of 5 K per month,. lump sum figures in US $ |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Wife gets 3 ˝ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 % |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 3 ˝ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 % |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
61.0 |
Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Wilcox v. Wilcox, 2003 CanLII 2272 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Mans support overpayment to be held by FRO as security for variation motion |
|
Pepall |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Danylkiw v. Danylkiw, 2003 CanLII 2283 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
15.0 |
Man pays 15 K lump for spousal support and 2 K per month child support, fraudulently reports income, children move in with man, wife ordered to pay retroactive support |
|
Pepall |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Pleadings struck for support default |
|
Pepall |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, 15 previous court orders, man ordered to pay 5 K per month |
|
Pepall |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Stein v. Stein, 2003 CanLII 46771 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Security held for costs paid out, man wins appeal and gets most returned |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Baldwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 21282 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy as security |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
11.0 |
Mans income 37 K, imputed to 48 K |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 879 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.8 |
Divorce action, wife claims 48K gets 10.8 K |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Bronfman v. Bronfman, 2000 CanLII 22710 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man made to deposit security with ex wifes lawyers |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Clegg v. Clegg, 2000 CanLII 22636 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 1.7 million for 4 years |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income, 61 K arrears, imputed income |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man found in contempt twice for selling property, first time 5 day imprisonment, second time sentencing hearing |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Motion for access and crossmotion for support, 4 K costs |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Spousal support default, security deposit 25 K, unemployed, 14 K arrears, variation denied |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Must post 25 K security to be held in trust against support and pay 14 K in arrears |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)\ |
mj |
Ip |
48.0 |
Man is unemployed but held to former income level of 48 K, variation denied |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Mondino v. Mondino,
2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans share of home held as security for support |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Mondino v. Mondino,
2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man subject to restraining order, ousts wife from house, wife gets custody, 2 K per month total support |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
sr |
L |
Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, can be reinstated if he pays arrears and costs, man leaves country and is arrested as an absconding debtor |
|
Sachs |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Sarafinchin v. Sarafinchin, 2000 CanLII 22639 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
305.0 |
Man claims 80 K income and is imputed to 385 K per year, 4.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears |
|
Speigel |
F |
T |
sr |
F |
Hosannah v. Hosannah, 2004 CanLII 9498 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
Appeal, wife asks for 13.8 K and gets 7 K costs for motion |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default judgement of lump sum child and spousal support, 447 equalization payment, variation denied |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
447.0 |
Lump sum child and spousal support and equalization payment of 447 K, variation denied |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
GIC held as security for lump sum |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2004 CanLII 7044 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
7 K costs of motion |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Dickie v. Dickie,
2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
C |
|
Contempt motion, 16.5 K |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Dickie v. Dickie,
2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.5 |
Contempt motion, 16.5 K |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
sr |
m |
Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Mans supervised access changed to unsupervised, increase in support |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Qi v. Fung, 2006 CanLII 16366 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Motion for child support, husbands income imputed to 40 K, 1.5 K costs |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Romanski v. Romanska, 2004 CanLII 9784 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
12.0 |
12 K lump sun for retroactive spousal support |
|
Stewart |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Witz v. Witz, 2004 CanLII 27102 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Proceeds from sale of home held as security in case of equalization payment, 75 K paid out to wife |
|
Swinton |
F |
T |
M |
M |
S. D. v. R. L., 2004 CanLII 6323 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife and husband are charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife moves in with boyfriend and has him charged with threats and harassment and changes locks on his house |
|
Thorburn |
F |
T |
sr |
|
Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order |
|
Thorburn |
F |
T |
sr |
|
Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
4 K total costs |
|
Young |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
68.0 |
Man claims 28 K imputed to 96 K, retroactive support, expert witnesses, 1.2 K per month child support |
|
Young |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.0 |
Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs |
|
Young |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
28.0 |
Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs |
|
Archibald |
M |
T |
F |
M |
Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44264 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife has exclusive possession until she vacates, husband claim for damages is dismissed |
|
Archibald |
M |
T |
F |
M |
Shoniker v. Gibbs, 2006 CanLII 6915 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
190.0 |
Man claims 265 K income and is imputed to 455 K |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
49.0 |
Man claims 28 K income tax and is imputed to 77 K, 4.7 K per month total support, variation dismissed |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man earlier convicted of assault, wife alleges and doesn’t appear for trial so charges are dropped, then convicted for assaulting children, 46 K per year support |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Cantwell v. Cantwell, 2000 CanLII 22450 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
30.0 |
30 K lump sum for support from man who is unemployed |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Delellis v. Delellis and Delellis, 2005 CanLII 36447 (ON
S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
45.0 |
Family claim including constructive trust, wife and child win 50 K and 10 K cost, claim 45 K costs |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest on multimillion dollar equalization will be about 100 K, 6.5 K spousal support per month |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must keep life insurance policy designated to wife and children |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Gartley v. Thibert, 2002 CanLII 2726 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Adult child in school quits and mom doesn’t tell FRO. Man gets mostly varied |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.0 |
Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty, life insurance policy for security |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
sr |
sr |
Matheson v. Matheson, 2003 CanLII 1949 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Default set aside with variation |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Moore v. Fernandes, 2001 CanLII 28263 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non depletion order |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Osmar v. Osmar, 2000 CanLII 20380 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
25.0 |
Wife asks for 33 K and gets 25 K for trial |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Picard v. Picard, 2001 CanLII 28214 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
79.0 |
Man claims 448 K income and is imputed to 527 K |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for drunken abuse, police called, wife gets custody, supervised child exchanges |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Sims-Howarth v. Bilcliffe, 2000 CanLII 22584 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
5 K for motion |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Snjaric. v. Snjaric, 2003 CanLII 1964 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order on mans property as security for support |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Witzel v. Witzel, 2004 CanLII 5006 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy as security for support |
|
Belobaba |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Feher v. Healey, 2006 CanLII 33312 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
14.0 |
Husband sues wife over transfer of home and loses, wife asks for 26 K and gets 14 K |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Javaid v. Valmas, 2006 CanLII 37882 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
5.5 K costs for contempt motion |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Kaplun v. Kaplun, 2007 CanLII 38396 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.5 |
7.5 K for motion |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Lyons v. Tuffner, 2007 CanLII 30665 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion, 1.5 K costs |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Man on welfare imputed to 36 K and denied spousal support |
|
Brown |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non dissapation order continued against mans request to have it lifted |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Babb v. Downer,
2005 CanLII 3371 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Mans income imputed many times higher than he claimed, costs 4 K |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 6047 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Costs of motion 4 K |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Copp v. Copp, 2004 CanLII 34077 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Divorce Action, 15 K costs |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
sr |
L |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
5.0 |
15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
sr |
L |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing |
|
Clark |
M |
T |
F |
M |
Molitor v. Andreou, 2006 CanLII 3481 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Interim support motion, husband ordered to pay 5.3 K per month support, 5 K costs |
|
Czurtin |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2007 CanLII 11716 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.0 |
Motion to vary support, wife asks 13.5 K and gets 7 K |
|
Czutrin |
M |
T |
M |
M |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
52.0 |
Man spends 2 ˝ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears |
|
Czutrin |
M |
T |
M |
M |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man spends 2 ˝ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears |
|
Day |
M |
T |
sr |
F |
Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K for interim motion |
|
Ferrier |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500 |
|
Ferrier |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500 |
|
Grossi |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Fabro v. Ferrante, 2003 CanLII 1952 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Establish life insurance as security for child support, common law wife gets constructive trust on family home |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Goryjowski v. Goryjowska, 2005 CanLII 3395 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
21.0 |
Mans income imputed at 21 K |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
sr |
|
Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
sr |
F |
Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
False records, income imputed, equalization based on her figures, a defaulting payor by not giving records |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
sr |
F |
Richards v. Richards,
2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims 20 K income is imputed to 60 K |
|
Hoilett |
M |
T |
sr |
F |
Richards v. Richards,
2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with threatening wife, wife gets custody, man says he has no income, imputed at 60 K, 1.9 K per month total support, 50 K equalization |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K for motion |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
sr |
|
Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order, june 2006 |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
sr |
|
Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must deposit 317 K to court as security, june 2006 |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
sr |
|
Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
5 K costs, june 2006 |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
F |
sr |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.)l |
mn |
L |
5.0 |
38 K arrears and 5 K lump sum award to be taken from mans portion of sale of home |
|
Jarvis |
M |
T |
sr |
F |
MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
1 K for interim motion, man goes bankrupt, retroactive arrears, man doesn’t appear at hearing |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Man found in contempt 6.5 K penalty |
|
Jennings |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Nasser v. Mayer-Nasser, 2000 CanLII 5654 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession but husband may sleep in house until wife has husband arrested |
|
Keenan |
M |
T |
sr |
sr |
Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay |
|
Keenan |
M |
T |
sr |
sr |
Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.1 |
6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay |
|
O’Connell |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
28.0 |
Man claims 72 K and is imputed to 100 K in 2004, order upheld in 2006 |
|
O’Connell |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Manis v. Manis, 2001 CanLII 3851 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Doesn’t comply with security order, depletes assets, contempt, imprisonment, appeal dismissed for non compliance |
|
O’Connell |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Maurici v. Maurici, 2001 CanLII 24161 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
L |
50.0 |
50 K lump sum upheld on appeal |
|
O’Connell |
M |
T |
F |
M |
Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
OConnell |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
155.0 |
Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K |
|
OConnell |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Pirner-Moser v. Pirner, 2003 CanLII 27465 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Cottage used as security in past, 45 days to pay lump sum or transfer |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession for previous 3 years, child support 15.3 K per month spousal support 9 K |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
1120.0 |
9 K per month spousal support, 15.3 K per month child support, man claims 176 K salary and income is imputed to 1296 K, wifes income imputed to 35 K |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Burke v. Burke, 2003 CanLII 2290 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Unemployed man held to former 53 K income, lowered to 40 K on appeal |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
25 K lump sum for support arrears |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Flikerski v. Flikerski, 2001 CanLII 28126 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
$1500 costs of motion |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, affirmed at 3 further hearings, man must pay $ 1262 per month child support and $ 300 spousal support |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
35.0 |
Appeal of support dismissed with 40 K reduction, 35 K costs of appeal added to trial |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
M |
F |
Narayan v. Padathe, 2006 CanLII 19943 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
75.0 |
Divorce action, 75 K costs |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets permanent exclusive possession, husband drags out procedures purposefully |
|
Paisley |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 4 years prejudgment interest |
|
Spence |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.8 |
Contempt motion, 15.8 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay |
|
Spence |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Contempt motion, $ 750 fine and 45 days in jail if he doesn’t pay fine and costs |
|
Spence |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Vesting order so wife gets condo, deemed to admit allegations against him due to default |
|
Spence |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Man in default, summary judgment for wife on property including vesting order |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Backhouse |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Miller v. Shankman, 2004 CanLII 5063 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
20.0 |
Unemployed wife imputed to 20 K income, gets 3 K per month spousal support |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
45.0 |
Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
25.0 |
Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs |
|
Benotto |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Guziolek v. Guziolek, 2006 CanLII 10740 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Man gets eclusive possession and wife gets occupancy rent, man has kids, house ordered sold |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Womans variaton motion dismissed, overturned on appeal |
|
Croll |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man and wife imputed, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
45.0 |
Womans pleadings struck, claims 30 K income, imputed to 75 K |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Greer |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Womans pleadings struck, june 2004, unstated costs, uncontested trial, claims 30 K income and imputed to 75 K, husband gets custody, 22 K retroactive arrears, home and cottage tranferred to man |
|
Herman |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Dagorne v. Cormack, 2007 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion, 0.75 K cost penalty, second interim 0.75 cost penalty, wife hasn’t paid first penalty |
|
Himel |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support |
|
Karakatsanis |
F |
T |
F |
M |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
56.0 |
Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband |
|
Low |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Contempt 1.5 K penalty later imposed by Benotto J |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
F |
M |
Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.25 |
Contempt motion for arrears, 4.25 K cost including 0.75 K for cost submissions |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Brittain v. Brittain, 2003 CanLII 2289 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
3.5 K for costs of denied mobility motion |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
M |
McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs for motion to be paid out of 55 K lump sum |
|
Macdonald |
F |
T |
M |
F |
Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
F |
L |
Bunt v. Assuras,
2003 CanLII 17952 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Defaulted divorce judgement, set aside, man sues lawyers |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Burmi v. Dhiman, 2001 CanLII 28206 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs for motion to amend pleadings for damage claim and add husbands parents, motion allowed but spousal support denied fo 7 week marriage |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Cundill v. Cundill, 2004 CanLII 30891 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
5.5 K for costs of motion |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
M |
Grierson v. Brunton, 2004 CanLII 4019 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
13 K in imputed income to unemployed wife, previous job was over 30 K average |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
sr |
M |
Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Default divorce judgement set aside, and no contempt found over access |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
M |
sr |
Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs of interim motion |
|
Mesbur |
F |
T |
L |
L |
Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K |
|
Thorburn |
F |
T |
M |
M |
|
mn |
D |
|
Woman defaults payments under separation agreement, man get garnishment order that is stayed |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Gartley v. Church, 2002 CanLII 2727 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Motion to adjust support overpayment, Husband is partially successful and claims 27 K and gets 3.5 K, wife claims 25 K |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
sr |
L.C.M. v. C.A.V., 2003 CanLII 47888 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order against wife, husband gets custody of triplets wifes access denied |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
M |
Sharpe v. Ebers, 2002 CanLII 2725 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Support variation, 4 K costs |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
sr |
Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Wife who abducted children imputed to 30 K per year though unemployed, temporary suspension of support payable and some arrears rescinded |
|
Aston |
M |
T |
M |
sr |
Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Woman abducts children, made to deposit passport as security for access, order overturned, criminal charges |
|
Ferrier |
M |
T |
sr |
M |
Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Womans default later overturned by Mesbur J |
|
Keenan |
M |
T |
L |
L |
Kallaba v. Bylykbashi, 2006 CanLII 3953 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Wifes motion for support is dismissed on summary judgment, wife gets security and vexacious litigant rulings overturned on appeal |