Party

Number

of  cases

Lump denied

  Lump   .ordered

Male

   100

   29.3

     70.7

Female

   100

   66.6 

     33.3

Party

Number

of  lumps

Overturned . on appeal

   Some   .  .  relief

No relief

Male

   100

    2.1

    6.4

     91.5

Female

   100

      0

      0

     100

Sex..of

  party

                      Outcome

1

McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)

m

57 K lump sum, must continue to pay 4.2 K per month support until lump sum is paid

2

Demarchi v. Selwyn, 2002 CanLII 2722 (ON S.C.)

m

 93 K lump sum made credited towards monthly payments

3

Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)

m

180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, costs and debt ruled outside bankruptcy and must be paid by husbands trustee in bankruptcy, contempt, secure support with life insurance policy

4

Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K

5

Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation

6

Wiltshire v. Wiltshire, 2005 CanLII 370 (ON S.C.)

m

41 K lump sum to be paid for arrears of support equalization and costs

7

Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.)

m

30 K spousal lump sum payment plus 1K per month and 387 K retroactive child support, income imputed , intentionally unemployed

8

Aunger v. Aunger, 2004 CanLII 39015 (ON S.C.)

m

 200 K lump sum support, wife already got 2 lump payments of 42 K

9

Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum child and spousal support and equalization payment of 447 K, variation denied

10

Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 80 K for support, imputed income, intentionally unemployed

11

Prichici v. Prichici, 2005 CanLII 16626 (ON S.C.)

m

Man  makes settlement agreement pays lump sum, court overturns and orders support, order overturning overturned on appeal.

12

Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.)

m

Man must rollover 57 K of pension in lump sum to wife

13

Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum 2.4 million, 95 K in support arrears, 26 K in cost arrears, 65 k fraud decision, 2 times jailed for comtempt, declares bankruptcy, accused on moving assets from country

14

Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)

m

  Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42  K income

15

Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.)

m

 Ordered to pay 7 K of support arrears in lump sum, must put $ 220 per month in account for special needs of child as well as paying support, child support increased

16

McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business

17

Felte v. Felte, 2003 CanLII 2118 (ON S.C.)

m

Man to pay 100 K lump sum on spousal support and 100 K lump sum on equalization

18

Gillett v. Smyth, 2002 CanLII 2786 (ON S.C.)

w

Wife to pay 5 K lump for arrears, 3.8 K per month in total support

19

Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.)

m

25 K in compensatory support, 28 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K per month in child support, must keep 250 K insurance policy as security

20

Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.)

m

15 K lump sum for retroactive support, life insurance policy as security

21

Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of $ 1750 but 22 K in calculated arrears of support

22

Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.)

m

Man paid 10 K lump at trial, gets some arrears expunged

23

Eagle v. Eagle, 2004 CanLII 2561 (ON S.C.)

m

45 K lump sum for support arrears, refused variation, 2.5 K per month support

24

Arella v. Scobak, 2003 CanLII 2460 (ON S.C.)

m

50 K lump sum for unjust enrichment, arrears not varied, wife seeks imprisonment, not found in contempt

25

Malo v. Malo, 2004 CanLII 4799 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 100 K paid as an advance on equalization

26

Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.)

m

Unspecified one time lump support them motion for interim spousal and child support of 1.1 K per month granted

27

Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)

m

7.3 K lump sum for arrears of spousal support, transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, a lien on his motorcycle, 15 K costs

28

Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.)

m

Man pays lump sum of 2.5 K for interim support

29

McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5876 (ON S.C.)

m

Setllement agreement gives wife 243 K lump for everything, she asks to have it overturned but is denied and given 325 K lump for retroactive child support.

30

Gallaugher v. Gallaugher, 2005 CanLII 19767 (ON S.C.)

m

2 lump sums to make up adjusted arrears or original apply. Fails to make all payments and arrears not rescinded

31

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum 42 K for child support, pleadings struck, 15 K equalization and 15 K constructive trust

32

Davis v. Davis, 2003 CanLII 2300 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of .6 K for retroactive support, 1.5 K per month ongoing support

33

Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum over 50 K given by transfer of home, $ 225 per month spousal support

34

MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty

35

Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.)

m

Man pays lump sum of 20 K for back support, equalization of 80 K and costs of 150 K, mother allowed to move to England with child

36

Conway v. Conway, 2005 CanLII 14136 (ON S.C.)

m

13.5 K lump sum for support, 6 K for equalization

37

Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)

m

Arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum

38

Harris v. Stuart Harris, 2005 CanLII 28789 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum payment of 40 K for spousal support, equalization would of gone 10 K against the wife so she is given additional 10 K unjust enrichment award brining total lump to 50 K

39

Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)

m

10 K interim lump payment for support, 175 vesting order on home with husbands share held in trust as security, 169 K equalization, domestic assault

40

Onogi v. Elguindi, 2005 CanLII 23686 (ON S.C.)

m

2 voluntary lump sums of 22 K and 24 K, court orders 26 K lump sum, equalization of 485 K and support of 5 K per month. lump sum figures in US $

41

Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19842 (ON S.C.)

m

Interim lump sum of 9 K reversed at trial and parties split cost

42

Ward v. Bates, 2005 CanLII 2947 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sums of 48 K and 18 K forced by FRO to pay arrears, intentionally unemployed, imputed income 100 K must borrow to stay out of jail, variation denied

43

Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.)

m

5 K lump on extraordinary child expenses, 12 K lump retroactive child support, charged on sale of house, domestic assault, hasn’t seen child in 1 ½ years, permanent restraining order

44

Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.)

m

9.1 K lump for retroactive support for one child to be paid from equalization, support of other child adjourned

45

Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.)

m

10 K lump for final settlement of spousal support, some reduction for past overpayment, intentionally unemployed due to not working overtime

46

Trick v. Trick, 2003 CanLII 2260 (ON S.C.)

m

152 K lump sum for retroactive child support, settlement agreement overturned, 2.2 K per month total support, claims he’s almost impecuous

47

Leckie v. Leckie, 2003 CanLII 1971 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum equalization prepayment of 14 K from sale of home, his sialboat and RRSP, security for ongoing support by life insurance policy

48

Reid v. Reid, 2005 CanLII 20793 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum obtained from estate of deceased ex husband

49

Dorthee v. Bekintis, 2004 CanLII 44989 (ON S.C.)

m

9 K lump sum for settlement of spousal support obligations, and 1 year $ 750 per month

50

Schwabe v. Schwabe, 2005 CanLII 37005 (ON S.C.)

m

5 K lump payment for s.7 ? expenses, 4 K arrears ordered paid, extraordinary expenses of 3 K to be paid

51

Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.)

m

$ 800 lump sum for occupational rent not excluded from his bankruptcy

52

Dolson v. Dolson, 2004 CanLII 33778 (ON S.C.)

m

32 K lump to settle support is husbands share of home, made on agreement, wife seeks to overturn agrreement and is denied

53

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 2005 CanLII 30878 (ON S.C.)

m

Prejudgement interest awaeded as lump sum, 8 K per month support, 1.2 million equalization to be paid in installments of 200 K

54

Scalabrini v. Scalabrini, 2003 CanLII 18778 (ON S.C.

m

7 K lump sum to settle spousal support

55

Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.)

m

Woman gets lump sum spousal support and costs

56

Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)

m

6 K lump sum for retroactive support,

57

Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON SC)

m

 Lump of 43 K for past arrears of 80 K, alienated from son who won’t see him, must get life insurance designated to son until son turns 27

58

McLean v. McLean, 2003 CanLII 2044 (ON SC)

m

20 K US lump sum from separation agreement paid, separation agreement ruled invalid

59

Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 35 K which is less than originally ordered. Court overrules separation agreement

60

Taylor v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 42952 (ON S.C.)

m

10 K compensatory lump sum support, 19 K equalization

61

Bechard v. Illingworth, 2003 CanLII 1923 (ON S.C.)

m

Must pay 5 K lump sum in 180 days for not disclosing rental income, man asks for lump sum to cover the payment and is denied

62

Rivers-Eshkibok v. Eshkibok, 2002 CanLII 2849 (ON S.C.)

m

9.6 K in compensatory support taken off unequal division of family home, 1 years of $ 800 per month transitional support

63

Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 23 K from severance package, increase in child support retroactive

64

Kelly v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 2344 (ON S.C.)

m

36 K lump sum and additional 19 K equalization in ammended afreement after 206 K equalization, third variation not allowed

65

Larkin v. Labonté, 2002 CanLII 2664 (ON S.C.)

m

60 K unjust enrichment to be paid  as a lump sum from mans RRSP

66

Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.)

m

38 K arrears and 5 K lump sum award to be taken from mans portion of sale of home

67

Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)

m

Pleadings struck, lump sum retroactive support of 14 K and costs of 20 K, arrested as absconding debtor, Fro holds 7 K security asks for his pleadings struck and 72 K arrears and 15 K security and jail and seizure of property if he defaults

68

G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.)

m

26 K lump sum for child and spousal support to be taken from proceeds of home

69

Lenz v. Broadhurst Main, 2004 CanLII 5059 (ON S.C

m

30 K lump sum payment reduced to 20 K, man sues his lawyers

70

Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)

m

54 K lump sum including 20 K for spousal support and child support arrears and special expenses, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, life insurance policy for security

71

Tessarolo v Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 25108 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum 5 K compensatory support, life insurance as security

72

Thomson v. Thomson, 2004 CanLII 7356 (ON S.C.)

m

Wife received 2 lump sums totaling 320 K, turned down for third lump sum of 125 K

73

Cade v. Rotstein, 2002 CanLII 2811 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum payments for increases in child support, pays 1.8 K per month child support, 3.5 K per month spousal support

74

R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C

m

10 K lumps sum compensatory support

75

Socan v. Socan, 2005 CanLII 33545 (ON S.C.

m

17 K lump sum equalizations or then taken from pension payment to be made in 30 day

76

David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)

m

22 K lump sum retroactive arrears

77

Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.)

m

5 K lump extraordinary child expenses, vesting order on home to wife

78

Pickard v. Pickard, 2005 CanLII 23688 (ON S.C)

m

5 K retroactive support, imputed income

79

Raaymakers v. Green, 2004 CanLII 39 (ON S.

m

79 K lump for spousal support giving wife the house with no equalization, 1.2 K child support and 1.4 K spousal support continued, 10 K lump for failing to disclose financial information

80

McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2804 (ON S.C.

w

16 K lump sum for retroactive spousal support from equalization, 1 K per month support, security denied

81

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

m

40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 215 ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %

82

Danylkiw v. Danylkiw, 2003 CanLII 2283 (ON S.C.)

m

Man pays 15 K lump for spousal support and 2 K per month child support, fraudulently reports income, children move in with man, wife ordered to pay retroactive support

83

Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.)

m

30 K lump sum support, an additional 71 K to be paid within 30 days.50 K interim disbursement, 35 K extraordinary expense, 8 K per month child support, interim motion

84

Tishbi v. Shemesh, 2005 CanLII 3383 (ON S.C.)

m

 200 K lump sum covering all claims

85

Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.)

m

 24 K lump sum paid, 21 K ordered for arrears of child support

86

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

M

2 lump sum payments already made, 40 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K in retroactive spousal support, 53 K equalization and vesting order for house, 40 K costs, restraining order

87

Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 45 K ordered, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied

88

Ristimaki v. Cooper, 2004 CanLII 16074 (ON S.C.)

m

2,5 million paid including various lump sums, almost 7 million still owing, default, petitioned into bankruptcy, man leaves country

89

Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 11194 (ON S.C.)

m

10 K lump sum for spousal support arrears

90

Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 35095 (ON S.C.)

m

79 K lump sum for retroactive support, separation agreement overturned, spousal support increased from $ 400 to 1.2 K per month

91

Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 3.3 K for s.7 expenses, wife found in contempt for not selling house

92

N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sums of 4.5 K and 3.5 K for costs and arrears of support, didn’t make equalization payment of 15 K, support 2 K per month total, no more motions until support is paid, wife allowed to move to Nova Scotia with children

93

Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 44 K for support arrears, 2.5 K per month total support, contempt for not returning children on time, wife separates by abducting children and gets custody, mans proceeds from sale of house to be held as security, vesting order on RRSP, imputed income

94

Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum for retroactive support to be based on imputed income, equalization 351 K

95

Palinka v Palinka, 2003 CanLII 2195 (ON S.C.)

m

Lump sum of 1.6 K for wifes expenses, wife denied restraining order and 15 K disbursement, gets 500 K life insurance designation for security and spousal support of 2.5 K

96

Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.)

m

2.5 K lump sum due within 14 days for arrears of child support, support increased to 1.3 K

                  Case

 Request ..   by

                                                                         ..                Case

Request ..   by

1

Chamaniall v Chamaniall

w

26

Eveleigh v Eveleigh  2005

w

2

Legault v Pineault  2006

w

27

Hesketh v Hesketh 

w

3

Beckett v Spencer  2002

w

28

Al Mutter v Al Ekabi  2003

w

4

Jellison v Jellison 2003

w

29

Loblaw v Loblaw  2005

w

5

DeCiccio v DeCiccio  2003

w

30

Shaw v Szabo  2003

w

6

Mnangi v Wahome  2004

w

31

Kalla v Kalla 2003

w

7

Pinizzatto v Pinizzatto  2005

w

32

Jahangiri – Mavaneh v Taheri – Zengekani  2003

w

8

Clewlow v Clewlow  2004

w

33

SB v DB  2003

w

9

Young v Hansen  2003

m

34

Retchard v Illingworth  2003

m

10

Meade v Meade  2002

m

35

Marsbergen v Marsbergen  2006

w

11

Millward v Millward  2002

w

36

Culhane v Culhane

w

12

Beitel v Beitel  2004

m

37

Thomson v Thomson  2004

w

13

Savage v Savage  2002

w

38

VAW v RCL  2004

w

14

Girouard v Girouard  2006

w

39

Feng v Philips  2005

w

15

Dababneh v Dababneh  2003

w

40

Hunter v Hunter 2005

m

16

Chehowy v Chehowy  2004

w

41

High v Green  2003

w

17

SL v AL  2003

w

42

MC v BD  2004

w

18

Miner v Miner 2004

w

43

DH v GP  2004

19

Roscoe v Roscoe  2003

m

44

Armstrong v Armstrong  2003

w

20

Bondy v Bondy  2004

w

45

Cameron v McGillivray  2005

w

21

Modino v Modino  2004

w

22

Chrnley v Chornley  2003

w

23

Dalgleish v Dalgleish  2003

w

24

Monaghan v Monaghan  2002

w

25

Martin v Martin

w