Federal Support Study Child Support 902k
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Claimed Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Incme after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Case |
14 |
15 |
Outcome |
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
(14.4) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(14.4) |
(54.4)) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
30.0 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
(4.8) |
0.0 |
13.8 |
(4.8) |
(18.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
9.0 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
(1.2) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(1.2) |
(41.2) |
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
27.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
(4.4) |
0.0 |
22.0 |
(4.4) |
(26.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
5.3 |
17.0 |
(5.4) |
(22.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
48.0 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.7) |
0.0 |
14.0 |
(5.7) |
(19.7) |
30.0 |
|
c |
s |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
$ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year |
54.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
54.0 |
(5.4) |
(19.1) |
65.0 |
|
c |
y |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.)
|
454 |
|
$ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs |
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
(3.8) |
0.0 |
12.0 |
(3.8) |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
(14.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(14.7) |
(14.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
60.6 |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(11.5) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(11.5) |
(14.3) |
48.8 |
|
c |
s |
Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
830 |
|
$ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year |
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
(11.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(11.7) |
(11.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
81.0 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
(8.8) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(8.8) |
(11.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
57.0 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
(5.8) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.8) |
(11.5) |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
(9.3) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(9.3) |
(11.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
(5.5) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.5) |
(11.2) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
(3.6) |
0.0 |
6.3 |
(3.6) |
(9.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
60.0 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
(9.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(9.6) |
(9.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
39.0 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
(6.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
16.0 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
4.6 |
(1.5) |
(6.1) |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(5.4) |
(5.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
(4.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
(2.4) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(2.4) |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
35.0 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
25.0 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
(2.7) |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
|
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
26.0 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
13.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
51 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
(8.6) |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(8.6) |
20.1 |
16.0 |
|
c |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
|
$ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
1624.0 |
0.0 |
121.2 |
1502.8 |
749.1 |
22.0 |
753.7 |
731.7 |
33.7 |
|
c |
s |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
10100 |
|
10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year |
15.0 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
(1.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
(1.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
21.0 |
1.1 |
(22.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
13.0 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
1.6 |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
17.0 |
5.0 |
1.6 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
3.4 |
(6.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
30.0 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
(1.8) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.8) |
(1.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
40.0 |
6.5 |
11.0 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
49.5 |
4.5 |
(45.0) |
65.0 |
|
c |
s |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
920 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears |
15.6 |
8.5 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
16 |
|
c |
o |
Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII)
|
248 |
|
$ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
58.0 |
9.0 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
48.0 |
4.2 |
(44.2) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance |
10.0 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
50.0 |
10.0 |
9.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
1.0 |
(34.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K |
40.0 |
10.0 |
6.8 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
3.2 |
(9.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
50.0 |
10.0 |
13.8 |
(3.8) |
0.0 |
4.7 |
(3.8) |
(8.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
1152 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
8.2 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
8.2 |
2.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
22.0 |
11.0 |
9.2 |
1.8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
39.4 |
|
c |
s |
Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year |
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
11.1 |
0.2 |
14.4 |
10.9 |
(3.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
25.0 |
12.0 |
5.7 |
6.3 |
0.4 |
43.6 |
6.3 |
(37.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
50.0 |
12.0 |
13.4 |
(1.4) |
0.4 |
19.0 |
(1.8) |
(20.8) |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
1116 |
|
$ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K |
47.0 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
0.4 |
24.0 |
3.6 |
(20.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
669 |
|
$ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income |
69.0 |
12.0 |
14.4 |
(2.4) |
0.4 |
14.0 |
(2.8) |
(16.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed |
43.0 |
12.0 |
9.6 |
2.4 |
0.4 |
12.0 |
2.0 |
(10.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K |
40.0 |
12.0 |
7.2 |
4.8 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
28.0 |
12.0 |
1.2 |
10.8 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
90.0 |
13.0 |
9.7 |
12.3 |
0.6 |
30.0 |
11.6 |
(18.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.)
|
806 |
|
Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
27.0 |
13.0 |
6.5 |
13.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
12.4 |
12.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
43.0 |
14.0 |
8.6 |
5.4 |
0.8 |
5.5 |
4.6 |
(0.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) |
714 |
|
$ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare |
35.0 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
10.2 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
72.0 |
14.4 |
7.9 |
6.5 |
0.9 |
7.9 |
5.6 |
(2.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) |
661 |
|
$ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income |
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
100.0 |
15.0 |
21.8 |
(6.8) |
1.1 |
11.0 |
(7.8) |
(18.8) |
96.0 |
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
1820 |
|
$ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs |
26.0 |
15.0 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial |
35.0 |
18.0 |
8.2 |
9.8 |
1.7 |
36.0 |
8.1 |
(44.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
35.0 |
18.0 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
1.7 |
30.0 |
10.3 |
(19.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
70.0 |
18.5 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
38.0 |
|
c |
o |
Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) |
766 |
|
$ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K |
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
18.7 |
18.7 |
5.6 |
13.1 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11 |
|
c |
o |
Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) |
463 |
|
$ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K |
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
17.7 |
2.1 |
5.7 |
15.6 |
9.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
|
20 |
6.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
175.0 |
20.0 |
12.1 |
7.9 |
2.1 |
59.0 |
5.8 |
(53.2) |
40.0 |
|
c |
y |
Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) |
1010 |
|
$ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income |
34.0 |
20.0 |
3.6 |
17.3 |
2.1 |
12.0 |
15.2 |
(27.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
40.0 |
20.0 |
8.8 |
11.2 |
2.1 |
9.6 |
9.1 |
(0.5) |
50.0 |
|
c |
o |
Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII)
|
737 |
|
$ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K |
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
20.8 |
20.8 |
1.2 |
19.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
4.8 |
|
c |
o |
D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII)
|
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. |
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
26.0 |
22.0 |
4.5 |
18.5 |
2.5 |
14.1 |
16.0 |
1.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
37.0 |
22.0 |
9.8 |
12.2 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
42.0 |
|
c |
s |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
820 |
|
$ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year |
41.6 |
22.3 |
4.5 |
17.8 |
2.6 |
0.0 |
15.2 |
15.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII)
|
359 |
|
$ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year |
53.0 |
23.0 |
8.9 |
14.1 |
2.7 |
22.8 |
11.4 |
(11.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
739 |
|
$ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K |
28.0 |
23.0 |
3.0 |
22.0 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
19.3 |
19.3 |
37.9 |
|
c |
o |
Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K |
23.5 |
23.5 |
5.2 |
18.3 |
2.8 |
5.7 |
15.5 |
9.8 |
35.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.)
|
435 |
|
$ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K |
30.0 |
24.0 |
6.8 |
17.2 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
14.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
39.0 |
24.0 |
6.7 |
17.3 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
14.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
116.0 |
25.0 |
14.6 |
10.4 |
3.2 |
21.1 |
7.2 |
(13.9) |
35.0 |
|
c |
o |
Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) |
880 |
|
$ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs |
25.0 |
25.0 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
35.8 |
25.0 |
9.6 |
15.4 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
12.2 |
12.2 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) |
800 |
|
$ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K |
45.0 |
26.0 |
9.1 |
17.0 |
3.4 |
10.1 |
13.6 |
3.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
635 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year |
44.0 |
26.0 |
17.8 |
8.2 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII)
|
1484 |
|
$ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K |
40.0 |
26.0 |
7.0 |
19.0 |
3.4 |
4.8 |
15.6 |
10.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
75 |
26 |
8.2 |
66.8 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
45.4 |
45.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) |
680 |
|
$ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K |
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
54.0 |
26.4 |
10.5 |
15.9 |
3.5 |
15.7 |
12.4 |
(3.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII)
|
750 |
|
$ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs |
27.0 |
27.0 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
41.0 |
27.0 |
7.8 |
19.8 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.2 |
16.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K |
27.9 |
27.9 |
4.2 |
23.7 |
3.8 |
12.0 |
19.9 |
7.9 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) |
350 |
|
$ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K |
96.0 |
28.0 |
14.4 |
13.6 |
4.2 |
28.0 |
9.4 |
(18.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears |
28.0 |
28.0 |
9.5 |
18.5 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
14.7 |
11.7 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) |
789 |
|
$ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year |
29.0 |
29.0 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
29.0 |
29.0 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
88.0 |
30.0 |
14.7 |
15.3 |
4.2 |
40.0 |
11.2 |
(28.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
894 |
|
$ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears |
30.0 |
30.0 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
88.2 |
30.0 |
9.8 |
20.2 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
16.0 |
4.0 |
120.0 |
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
694 |
|
$ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K |
30.0 |
30.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
20.4 |
8.4 |
10 |
|
c |
s |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year |
30.0 |
30.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
54.0 |
30.0 |
11.8 |
18.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) |
980 |
|
$ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K |
30.0 |
30.0 |
9.9 |
20.1 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
65 |
|
c |
s |
R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) |
827 |
|
$ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K |
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
30.5 |
30.5 |
8.2 |
22.3 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
60.9 |
|
c |
s |
Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K |
66.0 |
31.0 |
6.6 |
24.4 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
57.0 |
|
c |
s |
Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) |
550 |
|
$ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K |
31.2 |
31.2 |
3.4 |
27.8 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
23.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
|
c |
o |
Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. |
281 |
|
$ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year |
31.9 |
31.9 |
7.2 |
24.7 |
4.6 |
19.0 |
20.1 |
1.1 |
39.6 |
|
c |
o |
Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) |
478 |
|
$ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears |
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
33.0 |
33.0 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
67.0 |
33.0 |
7.2 |
25.8 |
4.9 |
11.0 |
20.9 |
9.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) |
603 |
|
$ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K |
33.0 |
33.0 |
3.5 |
29.5 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
28 |
|
c |
o |
Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) |
294 |
|
$ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K |
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
77.0 |
34.0 |
12.0 |
24.0 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K |
46.0 |
34.0 |
5.4 |
28.6 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
23.6 |
19.6 |
23.0 |
|
c |
o |
McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) |
446 |
|
$ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs |
34.0 |
34.0 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
35.0 |
35.0 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
35.0 |
35.0 |
10.7 |
24.3 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
19.0 |
16.5 |
29.1 |
|
c |
s |
McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
893 |
|
Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year |
35.0 |
35.0 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
80.0 |
35.0 |
9.1 |
25.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
719 |
|
$ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
50.0 |
35.0 |
10.1 |
24.9 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
x |
|
$ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed |
81.0 |
35.0 |
7.6 |
27.4 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
643 |
|
$ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K |
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
36.0 |
36.0 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
36.0 |
36.0 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
55.0 |
36.0 |
10.7 |
25.3 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
21.9 |
20.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
768 |
|
$ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K |
36.0 |
36.0 |
6.5 |
29.5 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
24.0 |
21.6 |
60.0 |
|
c |
s |
L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) |
545 |
|
$ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K |
36.0 |
36.0 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
48.0 |
36.0 |
5.4 |
30.6 |
5.5 |
3.2 |
25.1 |
21.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears |
37.0 |
37.0 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
37.0 |
37.0 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
38.0 |
38.0 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
38.0 |
38.0 |
5.0 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
3.2 |
27.1 |
23.9 |
10 |
|
c |
o |
Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) |
415 |
|
$ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K |
38.0 |
38.0 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
39.0 |
39.0 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
39.0 |
39.0 |
8.9 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
24.0 |
18.3 |
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)
|
740 |
|
$ 740 per month child support, retroactive arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum, refused set off with 37 % of time, man earns 39 K wife earns 30.5 K |
39.0 |
39.0 |
7.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) |
591 |
|
$ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears |
40.0 |
40.0 |
7.7 |
32.3 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
26.0 |
14.0 |
12 |
|
c |
s |
Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) |
645 |
|
$ 345 per month in child support and $ 300 in s.7 expenses, arrears, restraining order, mans income 40 K wifes 12 K |
40.0 |
40.0 |
4.1 |
35.9 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party |
40.0 |
40.0 |
12.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
21.4 |
21.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) |
1021 |
|
$ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K |
63.7 |
40.0 |
12.0 |
28.3 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
22.0 |
22.0 |
64.0 |
|
c |
s |
Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) |
996 |
|
$ 866 child support with $ 130 s.7 expenses, man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 63.7 K, wifes income 64 K per year |
40.0 |
40.0 |
10.2 |
29.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K |
40.0 |
40.0 |
3.9 |
36.1 |
6.3 |
5.7 |
29.8 |
24.1 |
35.6 |
|
c |
o |
Cook v. Cleverdon, 2005 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) |
325 |
|
$ 325 per month child support, retroactive arrears, father pays $ 300 in support for other children from other marriages also, mothers income 35.6 K and fathers income 40 K |
56.0 |
40.0 |
9.3 |
30.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
24.4 |
24.4 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 child support, 2.9 K arrears expunged, man claims income of 40 K imputed to 56 K, wife earns 22 K per year |
73.0 |
41.0 |
7.2 |
33.8 |
6.6 |
0.0 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) |
596 |
|
$ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K |
41 |
41 |
7.0 |
34.0 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.5 |
27.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) |
583 |
|
$ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year |
41.9 |
41.9 |
15.5 |
25.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
18.7 |
18.7 |
3.3 |
|
c |
s |
Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) |
960 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year |
42.0 |
42.0 |
4.9 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
46 |
|
c |
s |
Kimmerly v. Parks, 2005 CanLII 40368 (ON S.C.) |
410 |
|
$ 410 total child support per month, 9 K arrears to be paid $ 100 per month, $ 48 per month s.7 expenses retroactive, mans income 42 K and wife earns 46 K per year, |
42.0 |
42.0 |
4.6 |
37.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
13 |
|
c |
o |
Buckner v. Card, 2007 ONCJ 51 (CanLII)
|
386 |
|
$ 386 per month child support, wife and child live in Alberta, man has 42 K income wife makes 13 K per year |
43.0 |
43.0 |
7.8 |
35.2 |
6.9 |
14.5 |
28.3 |
13.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K |
43.0 |
43.0 |
6.0 |
33.0 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.1 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
371 |
|
$ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K |
43.7 |
43.7 |
7.4 |
36.3 |
7.1 |
9.3 |
29.0 |
19.7 |
23.7 |
|
c |
s |
Ricketts v. Thomas, 2004 CanLII 12990 (ON S.C.) |
619 |
|
$ 619 per month child support, no order for spousal support, 9.3 retroactive arrears with some due to Ont Works, mans income 43.7 K and wifes is 23.7 K |
43.8 |
43.8 |
10.2 |
33.6 |
7.1 |
2.2 |
26.5 |
24.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears |
43.9 |
43.9 |
10.1 |
33.8 |
7.1 |
16.9 |
26.7 |
9.8 |
37.4 |
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) |
843 |
|
$ 763 per month child support plus $ 80 per month s.7 expenses, 3.2 K retroactive arrears and 10.4 K arrears, mans income 43.9 K and wifes income 37.4 K per year, 3.3 K costs |
44.0 |
44.0 |
5.1 |
38.9 |
7.2 |
8.5 |
31.7 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) |
423 |
|
$ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award |
44.7 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Sills v. Sills, 2002 CanLII 2705 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Guideline support for 3 children and an unspecified portion of s.7 expenses, father earns 44.7 K and mother earns 30.5 K per year |
45.0 |
45.0 |
9.3 |
35.7 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
28.3 |
28.3 |
36.0 |
|
c |
s |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and $ 140 s.7 expenses, mans income 45 K per year and wifes income is 36 K per year |
45.0 |
45.0 |
4.8 |
40.2 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
32.8 |
32.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) |
387 |
|
$ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K |
45.4 |
45.4 |
7.7 |
37.7 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
30.2 |
28.0 |
12 |
|
c |
o |
Kocko v. Kocko, 2004 CanLII 12571 (ON C.J.) |
641 |
|
$ 391 per month child support changed from temporary order of $ 920 per month, $ 250 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 45.4 K, wifes income 12 K per year, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 expense |
46.0 |
46.0 |
10.6 |
35.4 |
8.7 |
6.5 |
26.7 |
20.2 |
37.6 |
|
c |
s |
Cava v. Cava, 2005 CanLII 19815 (ON S.C.) |
760 |
|
$ 660 for both children and 1.2 K per year s.7 expense and $ 859 retroactive s.7 expense, arrears, retroactive monthly award, mans income 46 K and wifes income 37.6 K per year |
65.0 |
46.0 |
5.6 |
40.4 |
8.7 |
10.0 |
31.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime |
46.5 |
46.5 |
5.4 |
41.1 |
8.8 |
19.0 |
32.3 |
13.3 |
19.0 |
|
c |
s |
Glomba v. Wray, 2003 CanLII 1960 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 400 child support and $ 66 daycare expense, mans income 46.5 K and wife earns 19 K, arrears |
47.0 |
47.0 |
8.5 |
38.5 |
8.9 |
32.0 |
29.6 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) |
710 |
|
$ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents |
47.0 |
47.0 |
5.0 |
42.0 |
8.9 |
6.8 |
33.1 |
26.3 |
18.3 |
|
c |
s |
Paul v. Misselbrook, 2006 CanLII 13553 (ON S.C.) |
414 |
|
$ 414 per month child support, 6.8 K retroactive award, mans income 47 K and wife earns 18.3 K |
47.0 |
47.0 |
10.4 |
36.6 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
|
$ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year |
47.1 |
47.1 |
8.0 |
39.1 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
30.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K |
49.0 |
49.0 |
12.9 |
35.1 |
12.1 |
19.0 |
23.0 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
1074 |
|
$ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K |
49.0 |
49.0 |
9.9 |
39.1 |
12.1 |
9.7 |
27.0 |
17.3 |
53.0 |
|
c |
o |
Hillier v. Hillier, 2005 ONCJ 120 (CanLII) |
700 |
|
$ 700 per month child support, 9.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 49 K wife makes 53 K per year |
49.0 |
49.0 |
11.2 |
37.8 |
12.1 |
2.0 |
25.7 |
23.7 |
34.0 |
|
c |
s |
B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) |
806 |
|
$ 683 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses, father earns 49 K mother earns 34 K, costs 2 K |
49.1 |
49.1 |
10.8 |
38.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) |
901 |
|
$ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K |
49.5 |
49.5 |
7.8 |
41.7 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
Simmonds v. Simmonds, 2007 CanLII 8007 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 450 per month and $ 200 per month in s.7 expenses, father earns 49.5 K and mother earns 31 K |
50.0 |
50.0 |
12.0 |
38.0 |
12.5 |
30.0 |
25.5 |
(4.5) |
47.0 |
|
c |
s |
Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) |
1003 |
|
$ 753 per month child support and 3 K per year s.7 expenses, 19 K arrears, mans income 50 K, wife earns 47 K per year, 11 K costs |
50.0 |
50.0 |
9.3 |
40.7 |
12.5 |
7.2 |
28.2 |
21.0 |
61.0 |
|
c |
s |
Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) |
777 |
|
$ 777 per month child support, 7.2 K arrears, man makes 50 K and wife makes 61 K |
50.0 |
50.0 |
8.4 |
41.6 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
29.1 |
29.1 |
12.0 |
|
c |
s |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 21793 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 300 per month contribution to RESP and pays mortgage and insurance, man makes 50 K and wife makes 12 K per year |
50.0 |
50.0 |
5.7 |
44.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) |
475 |
|
$ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji |
50.8 |
50.8 |
5.3 |
45.5 |
12.7 |
7.0 |
32.8 |
25.8 |
24.0 |
|
c |
s |
Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.)
|
438 |
|
$ 216 per month child support and $ 222 per month s.7 expense, 7 K retroactive arrears, mans income 50.8 K per year and wife has income of 24 K |
51.0 |
51.0 |
8.2 |
42.8 |
12.8 |
12.0 |
30.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII |
560 |
|
$ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year |
52.0 |
52.0 |
5.2 |
46.8 |
13.1 |
12.0 |
33.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) |
430 |
|
$ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year |
52.0 |
52.0 |
10.9 |
41.1 |
13.1 |
6.3 |
28.5 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) |
783 |
|
$ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year |
52.5 |
52.5 |
5.7 |
46.8 |
13.2 |
27.2 |
33.6 |
6.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) |
477 |
|
$ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K |
53.0 |
53.0 |
5.4 |
47.6 |
13.4 |
5.7 |
34.2 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
450 |
|
$ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year |
53.0 |
53.0 |
6.0 |
47.0 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.6 |
33.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K |
53.4 |
53.4 |
5.9 |
47.5 |
13.5 |
1.4 |
34.0 |
32.6 |
28.0 |
|
c |
s |
Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) |
494 |
|
$ 494 per month child support, arrears 1.4 K, mans income 53.4 K and wifes income 28 K |
53.5 |
53.5 |
7.0 |
46.5 |
13.6 |
5.7 |
32.9 |
27.2 |
49.0 |
|
c |
s |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 580 per month child support plus retroactive arrears of 5.7 K, fathers income 53.5 K and mothers income 49 K |
54.0 |
54.0 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
28.5 |
24.5 |
2.7 |
|
c |
s |
MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
982 |
|
$ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears |
54.0 |
54.0 |
10.6 |
43.4 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
29.7 |
25.7 |
52.0 |
|
c |
s |
Dodd v. Dodd, 2003 CanLII 2100 (ON S.C.) |
755 |
|
$ 755 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears, fathers income 54 K and wifes income 52 K per year |
54.0 |
54.0 |
11.7 |
42.3 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII)
|
852 |
|
$ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K |
55.0 |
55.0 |
5.9 |
49.1 |
14.0 |
19.0 |
35.1 |
16.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) |
495 |
|
$ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year |
55.0 |
55.0 |
7.6 |
47.4 |
14.0 |
2.9 |
33.4 |
30.5 |
26.0 |
|
c |
s |
Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 1976 (ON S.C.) |
635 |
|
$ 468 child support for remaining dependant, must pay 2 K directly to older daughter, 2.9 K arrears, man makes 55 K and wife makes 26 K per year |
55.0 |
55.0 |
9.0 |
46.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
24.0 |
|
c |
s |
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2006 CanLII 19439 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, man makes 55 K and wife makes 24 K per year |
56.6 |
56 |
17.6 |
38.4 |
14.4 |
6.0 |
24.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
1463 |
|
$ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs |
56.0 |
56.0 |
8.8 |
47.2 |
14.3 |
(6.4) |
32.9 |
39.3 |
42.0 |
|
c |
s |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) |
731 |
|
$ 731 per month child support, overpayment of 6.4 K, mans income is 56 K and wifes income is 42 K per year |
56.0 |
56.6 |
9.4 |
46.6 |
14.4 |
27.0 |
32.2 |
5.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII)
|
780 |
|
$ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award |
58.0 |
58.0 |
20.3 |
37.7 |
15.0 |
9.0 |
23.7 |
14.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) |
1358 |
|
$ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears |
58.0 |
58.0 |
7.5 |
50.5 |
14.9 |
18.2 |
36.5 |
18.3 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
L.K. v. G.K., 2007 CanLII 9612 (ON S.C.) |
496 |
|
$ 496 per month child support, s.7 expenses, change of residence of child to mother, father owes 18.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K and womans income 30 K |
99.0 |
58.0 |
11.1 |
46.9 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
31.9 |
31.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
927 |
|
$927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K |
58.0 |
58.0 |
2.4 |
55.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year |
59.0 |
59.0 |
9.6 |
39.4 |
15.3 |
8.0 |
24.1 |
16.1 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Roy v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 18693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support to be reduced to $ 509, father must pay 8 K of university expenses, fathers income 59 K and mothers income 22 K |
59.0 |
59.0 |
10.3 |
48.7 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) |
858 |
|
Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare |
59.4 |
59.4 |
11.2 |
48.2 |
15.5 |
5.1 |
32.7 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) |
935 |
|
$ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year |
60.0 |
60.0 |
7.6 |
52.4 |
15.6 |
45.7 |
36.8 |
(8.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income |
60.0 |
60.0 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
24.3 |
38.3 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII)
|
507 |
|
$ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year |
100.0 |
60.0 |
10.6 |
49.4 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
33.8 |
33.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) |
877 |
|
$ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
60.0 |
60.0 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
2.1 |
38.3 |
36.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year |
60.0 |
60.0 |
6.0 |
54.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
26.0 |
|
c |
s |
Lee v. Lee, 2006 CanLII 5612 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 child support, $ 500 spousal, child support ended, man makes 60 K and wife makes 26 K |
60.0 |
60.0 |
6.7 |
53.3 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
39.7 |
39.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K |
60.8 |
60.8 |
6.2 |
54.6 |
15.8 |
20.8 |
38.8 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) |
514 |
|
$ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K |
139.0 |
61.0 |
25.2 |
35.8 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
19.9 |
19.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
|
$1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year |
61.0 |
61.0 |
10.4 |
50.6 |
15.9 |
4.5 |
34.7 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) |
863 |
|
$ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears |
61.0 |
61.0 |
10.6 |
50.4 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
63.0 |
|
c |
o |
Bertram v. Murdock, 2006 ONCJ 69 (CanLII |
880 |
|
$ 531 child support when child is at home and $ 406 when at school, $ 4550 per year tuition expenses, father makes 61 K and mother makes 63 K per year |
61.0 |
61.0 |
9.2 |
51.8 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
35.9 |
35.9 |
69.0 |
|
c |
s |
Matwiyw v. Matwiyw, 2004 CanLII 7764 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 841 child support order varied to $ 770, fathers income 61 K mothers income 69 K |
62.9 |
62.9 |
16.0 |
44.9 |
16.5 |
1.4 |
28.4 |
27.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K |
63.0 |
63.0 |
17.4 |
45.6 |
16.5 |
71.0 |
29.1 |
(41.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) |
1120 |
|
$1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year |
63.2 |
63.2 |
6.4 |
57.0 |
16.6 |
0.0 |
40.4 |
40.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) |
531 |
|
$ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K |
64.0 |
64.0 |
10.8 |
53.2 |
16.8 |
190.0 |
36.4 |
(153.6) |
24 |
|
c |
s |
Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
900 |
|
$ 900 per month child support and 180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, 10 K costs, 180 K spousal support lump sum, man makes 64 K and wife makes 24 K |
250.0 |
64.0 |
48.9 |
15.1 |
16.8 |
22.0 |
(1.7) |
(23.7) |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) |
3400 |
|
3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K |
85.0 |
65.0 |
24.7 |
40.3 |
14.0 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
16.6 |
21.6 |
|
c |
s |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) |
1380 |
|
1.2 K child support and $ 180 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 65 K and is imputed to 85 K, wife has income of 21.6 K |
65.0 |
65.0 |
14.2 |
50.8 |
17.1 |
0.0 |
33.7 |
33.7 |
35.0 |
|
c |
s |
Jones v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 23318 (ON S.C.) |
1182 |
|
$ 2260 per month child support reduced to $ 1182 by separation agreement, man makes 65 K and wife makes 35 K per year |
66.0 |
66.0 |
14.9 |
51.1 |
17.4 |
20.2 |
33.7 |
13.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) |
908 |
|
$ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year |
66.0 |
66.0 |
14.2 |
51.8 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
34.4 |
34.4 |
17.0 |
|
c |
s |
Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) |
1183 |
|
$ 844 child support per month and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wifes income 17 K per year before support |
66.0 |
66.0 |
8.4 |
57.6 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
40.2 |
40.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) |
696 |
|
$ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year |
66.3 |
66.3 |
11.9 |
54.4 |
17.5 |
4.9 |
36.5 |
31.6 |
32 |
|
c |
s |
Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) |
992 |
|
$ 992 per month child support, husband makes $ 1400 per month mortgage payments too, mans income 66.3 K and wifes income 32 K per year |
67.0 |
67.0 |
12.6 |
54.4 |
17.8 |
7.9 |
36.6 |
28.7 |
|
|
c |
y |
Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) |
1048 |
|
$ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K |
67.3 |
67.3 |
16.0 |
51.3 |
17.9 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) |
1330 |
|
$ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year |
68.0. |
68.0 |
13.5 |
54.5 |
18.1 |
0.0 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) |
1123 |
|
$ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year |
70.0 |
70.0 |
19.9 |
50.1 |
18.7 |
9.5 |
31.4 |
21.9 |
50.0 |
|
c |
o |
Griffiths v. Griffiths, 2007 ONCJ 26 (CanLII) |
1322 |
|
$ 1322 per month child support plus dental expense, 9.5 K arrears, man makes 70 K and wife makes 50 K per year |
71.3 |
71.3 |
7.9 |
63.4 |
19.1 |
0.0 |
44.3 |
44.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) |
656 |
|
$ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K |
72.0 |
72.0 |
9.6 |
62.4 |
19.3 |
28.7 |
43.1 |
14.4 |
26.0 |
|
c |
s |
Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, retroactive 23 K lump sum award, retroactive arrears, mans income 72 K and wifes income 26 K |
73.5 |
73.5 |
6.9 |
66.6 |
20.9 |
61.6 |
45.7 |
(15.9) |
65.5 |
|
c |
s |
Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) |
577 |
|
$ 577 per month child support and 4.5 K additional retroactive s.7 expense, 57.1 K lump sum award, wife may reapply for periodic support, man makes 73.5 K and wife makes 65.5 K per year |
84.0 |
75.0 |
12.5 |
62.5 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
41.1 |
41.1 |
7.3 |
|
c |
s |
Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy |
75.0 |
75.0 |
9.3 |
65.7 |
21.4 |
2.7 |
44.3 |
41.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII)
|
778 |
|
$ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs |
75.0 |
75.0 |
7.3 |
67.7 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
46.3 |
46.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) |
606 |
|
$ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year |
76.0 |
76.0 |
24.5 |
51.5 |
21.8 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) |
1922 |
|
$ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her |
80.1 |
76.4 |
12.5 |
63.9 |
21.9 |
0.0 |
42.0 |
42.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K |
77.0 |
77.0 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
66.9 |
42.9 |
(24.0) |
|
|
c |
o |
Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K |
77.0 |
77.0 |
19.9 |
57.1 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
40 |
|
c |
s |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) |
1659 |
|
$ 1001 per month child support and special expenses up to $ 658 per month, husband earns 77 K per year and wife earns 40 K per year |
80.0 |
80.0 |
18.9 |
61.1 |
21.8 |
25.0 |
39.3 |
14.3 |
49.0 |
|
c |
s |
Zlatar v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 22344 (ON S.C.) |
1241 |
|
$ 908 per month child support, 4 K per year s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears, man makes 80 K and wife makes 49 K per year. |
81.7 |
81.7 |
16.3 |
65.4 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
40.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) |
1360 |
|
$ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs |
100.0 |
82.0 |
9.3 |
72.7 |
25.4 |
7.0 |
47.3 |
40.3 |
20.0 |
|
c |
s |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
773 |
|
$773 child support and s.7 daycare expenses, $ 850 interim spousal support terminated, claim for unequal division rejected, man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife has 20 K income, 7 K costs |
83.0 |
83.0 |
16.7 |
66.3 |
25.8 |
8.2 |
40.2 |
32.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) |
1392 |
|
$1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year |
83.3 |
83.3 |
15.1 |
68.2 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) |
1261 |
|
$ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K |
85.0 |
85.0 |
26.0 |
59.0 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
|
$ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K |
89.0 |
89.0 |
16.8 |
72.2 |
34.3 |
18.0 |
37.9 |
19.9 |
47.9 |
|
c |
s |
Clarke v. Clarke, 2007 CanLII 50596 (ON S.C.) |
1063 |
|
$ 1063 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 18 K arrears, man makes 89 K and wife makes 47.9 K |
90.0 |
90.0 |
18.5 |
71.5 |
34.7 |
9.7 |
36.8 |
27.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) |
1209 |
|
$ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K |
90.0 |
90.0 |
10.0 |
80.0 |
34.7 |
9.1 |
45.3 |
36.2 |
182.0 |
|
c |
s |
Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) |
832 |
|
$ 832 now directly payable to daughter, s.7 expenses, 9.1 K retroactive arrears payable to mother from funds held for equalization, husband makes 90 K and wife makes 182 K per year |
94.0 |
94.0 |
12.0 |
82.0 |
36.5 |
0.0 |
45.5 |
45.5 |
38.2 |
|
c |
s |
Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2187 (ON S.C.)
|
998 |
|
$ 998 total child support per month including $ 277 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 94 K and wifes income 38.2 K per year |
100.0 |
100 |
27.0 |
73.0 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
33.9 |
33.9 |
46.1 |
|
c |
s |
Johnson v. Castellano, 2006 CanLII 34434 (ON S.C.) |
2250 |
|
$ 1825 per month child support and $ 425 per month s.7 expenses, man is given support reduction for lower earnings due to depression but must now assume former income, wife makes 46.1 K per year |
101.0 |
101.0 |
10.7 |
90.3 |
39.5 |
9.7 |
58.5 |
49.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
889 |
|
$ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year |
105.0 |
105.0 |
15.0 |
89.0 |
41.2 |
0.0 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
18.0 |
|
c |
s |
Potyrala v. Potyrala, 2007 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) |
916 |
|
$ 916 per month interim child support, retroactivity to be decided at trial, 85 % s.7 expenses, mans income 105 K wifes income 18 K |
110.0 |
110.0 |
18.1 |
91.4 |
44.1 |
0.0 |
47.3 |
47.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) |
1506 |
|
$ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year |
114.0 |
114.0 |
39.6 |
74.4 |
45.1 |
79.0 |
29.3 |
(49.7) |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed |
120.0 |
115.0 |
6.0 |
109.0 |
45.6 |
0.0 |
63.4 |
63.4 |
21.0 |
|
c |
s |
Duggan v. Elson, 2007 CanLII 45910 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, man claims 115 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife has 21 K income per year |
161.0 |
117.0 |
24.2 |
92.8 |
46.4 |
70.0 |
46.4 |
(23.6) |
46.3 |
z |
c |
s |
Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) |
2020 |
|
$ 2020 per month child support, 70 K lump sum spousal support, man makes 161 K and wife makes 46.3 K per year, man must continue to pay on separation agreement despite claiming lower 117 K income |
118.0 |
118.0 |
14.9 |
103.1 |
46.9 |
19.0 |
56.2 |
37.2 |
67.0 |
|
c |
s |
Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) |
1245 |
|
$ 1020 child support and $ 225 s.7 expenses. 19 K retroactive arrears, man makes 118 K and wife makes 67 K |
127.0 |
127.0 |
22.8 |
104.2 |
50.8 |
11.7 |
53.4 |
41.7 |
43.8 |
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) |
1897 |
|
$ 1721 per month child support, $ 176 s.7 expense per month and 2 K retroactive award, retroactive arrears, fathers income 126.6 K mothers income 43.8 K per year |
132.0 |
132.0 |
21.4 |
110.8 |
56.6 |
70.0 |
54.2 |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) |
1783 |
|
$ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year |
200.0 |
134.0 |
19.7 |
114.3 |
57.5 |
26.8 |
56.8 |
30.0 |
24.0 |
|
c |
o |
A.(L.C.) v. A.(R.J.), 2003 CanLII 52484 (ON C.J.) |
1308 |
|
$ 1308 per month child support, 86 % s.7 expenses, arrears 26.8 K, father claims 134 K income and is imputed to 200 K, mother makes 24 K, |
138.0 |
138.0 |
24.0 |
114.0 |
59.4 |
40.0 |
54.6 |
14.6 |
39.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bond v. Bond, 2007 CanLII 41898 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
2000 |
|
2 K per month for 2 children, retroactive child support of 40 K, mans income 138 K per year and wifes income 39 K per year |
138.0 |
138.0 |
23.7 |
114.3 |
59.4 |
0.0 |
54.9 |
54.9 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
McCrea v. McCrea, 2005 CanLII 378 (ON S.C.) |
1640 |
|
$ 1640 per month child support reduced from $ 2850, s.7 expenses, father has 138 K income and mother has 31 K income |
139.0 |
139.0 |
12.0 |
127.0 |
59.9 |
0.0 |
67.1 |
67.1 |
91.0 |
|
c |
y |
Park v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 14132 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support in trust fund, man makes 139 K and wife makes 91 K, s.7 expenses, 70 K retroactive arrears overturned on appeal |
147.0 |
147.0 |
39.3 |
107.7 |
63.6 |
25.0 |
44.1 |
19.1 |
57.0 |
|
c |
s |
Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2311 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
2.6 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears,mans income 147 K including overtime and wifes income 57 K per year |
150.0 |
150.0 |
31.2 |
118.8 |
65.0 |
0.0 |
53.8 |
53.8 |
63.0 |
|
c |
s |
Ruel v. Juodis, 2005 CanLII 14133 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
$ 1233 per month child support and $ 675 s.7 expense and $ 690 discretionary extra expense per month, man makes 150 K and wife makes 40 K and is imputed to 63 K per year |
151.0 |
151.0 |
19.0 |
132.0 |
65.4 |
24.9 |
66.6 |
41.7 |
290.0 |
|
c |
s |
Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) |
1250 |
|
$ 1250 child support per month, 34 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, fathers income grossed up to 151.8 K and mothers 289.5 K per year, 15.2 K costs |
154.0 |
154.0 |
63.3 |
90.1 |
66.8 |
40.0 |
23.3 |
(16.7) |
38.5 |
|
c |
s |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
4600 |
|
4.6 K per month child support including 75 % s.7 expenses, 40 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 154 K per year and wife makes 38.5 K |
165.0 |
165.0 |
27.7 |
137.3 |
71.9 |
3.9 |
65.4 |
61.5 |
75 |
|
c |
o |
Osmak-Bonk v. Bonk, 2004 ONCJ 167 (CanLII) |
2305 |
|
1.93 K per month child support and 9.4 K s.7 expense, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears 3.9 K, arrears, mans income 165 K, wifes income is 75 K per year |
179.0 |
179.0 |
19.6 |
159.4 |
78.4 |
25.0 |
81.0 |
56.0 |
30.3 |
|
c |
s |
Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
|
1.3 K per month child support, 87 % of s.7 expenses, 25 K, arrears, fathers income 179 K and mothers income 30.3 K per year |
221.0 |
221.0 |
47.4 |
173.6 |
97.9 |
(16.3) |
75.7 |
92.0 |
41.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zimmerman v. Doe, 2007 CanLII 28755 (ON S.C.) |
3977 |
|
$ 2500 per month child support and s.7 expenses of $ 1477 per month and reimbursement for 16.3 K prior s.7 expenses, man makes 221 K per year and wife makes 41.9 K |
250.0 |
250.0 |
12.0 |
238.0 |
111.4 |
0.0 |
126.6 |
126.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year |
275.0 |
275.0 |
24.8 |
250.2 |
123.0 |
24.0 |
127.0 |
103.0 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Cowie v. Makin, 2004 CanLII 5762 (ON S.C.) |
2065 |
|
$ 2065 per month in child support, 24 K arrears set against equalization, mans income 275 K and wifes income changed from 110 K to 26 K per year |
290.0 |
290.0 |
39.6 |
250.4 |
129.9 |
50.0 |
120.1 |
70.1 |
54.0 |
|
c |
s |
Monaghan v. Monaghan, 2002 CanLII 2676 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
3.3 K per month child support, man pays 50 K per year of childrens university expenses, man makes 290 K and wife makes 54 K per year |
320.0 |
320.0 |
50.1 |
269.9 |
143.9 |
53.0 |
125.1 |
72.1 |
75.0 |
|
c |
s |
Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) |
3500 |
|
3.5 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 28 K retroactive lump sum spousal support, man earns 25 K compensatory lump sum support, 320 K and wife earns 75 K per year |
787.0 |
328.0 |
117.6 |
210.4 |
152.2 |
22.0 |
58.2 |
36.2 |
193.0 |
|
c |
s |
Howe v. Tremblay, 2007 CanLII 44350 (ON S.C.) |
9800 |
|
5.7 K per month child support and 4.1 K per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims 328 K income and is imputed to 767 K as non recurring income is included, wifes income is 193 K per year |
502.0 |
502.0 |
180.0 |
322.0 |
228.3 |
12.0 |
93.7 |
81.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) |
15000 |
|
15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed |
559 |
559 |
46.5 |
512.5 |
254.8 |
22.0 |
257.2 |
235.2 |
76 |
|
c |
s |
Werden v. Werden, 2005 CanLII 45741 (ON S.C.) |
3875 |
|
3.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 559 K per year and wifes income 76 K per year |
5500 |
745 |
276.0 |
469.0 |
341.1 |
951.0 |
127.9 |
(823.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) |
23000 |
|
Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year |
811.0 |
766.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared |
769.0 |
769.0 |
106.5 |
662.5 |
352.3 |
107.0 |
310.2 |
203.2 |
270 |
|
c |
s |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) |
8200 |
|
72 K retroactive arrears of child support, 35 K retroactive arrears 75 % of s.7 expenses, 8.2 K per month child support, man makes 769 K per year and wife makes 270 K |
777.0 |
777.0 |
107.7 |
669.3 |
356.0 |
0.0 |
313.3 |
313.4 |
40.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bladwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 878 (ON S.C.) |
8300 |
|
8.3 K per month child support and 95 % of s.7 expenses |
2000 |
2000 |
181.2 |
1818.8 |
928.0 |
0.0 |
890.0 |
890.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) |
15100 |
|
15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year |
5000 |
5000 |
228.0 |
4772.0 |
2315.8 |
0.0 |
2456.2 |
2456.2 |
30.0 |
|
c |
s |
Quinn v. Keiper, 2005 CanLII 43685 (ON S.C.) |
19000 |
|
10 million equalization, 5 K per month child support, father pays between 10 and 18.5 K per month s.7 expenses, man makes 5000 K and wife makes 30 K per year |
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Court Ordered Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Court Ordered Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Court Ordered Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Income after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Case |
14 |
15 |
Outcome |
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
20 |
6.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
9 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
10 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
13 |
4 |
2.4 |
11.6 |
0.6 |
6.0 |
11.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
15 |
2 |
3.5 |
11.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
16 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
14.5 |
1.3 |
4.6 |
13.2 |
8.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
13.3 |
1.3 |
14.4 |
12.0 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
17 |
5 |
1.6 |
15.4 |
1.5 |
9.7 |
13.9 |
4.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
16.3 |
1.7 |
21.0 |
14.6 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial |
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
15.4 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
16.3 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
2.3 |
5.7 |
14.7 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
19.6 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
17.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
5.7 |
17.2 |
11.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
19.2 |
2.9 |
12.0 |
16.3 |
4.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
25 |
12 |
5.7 |
19.3 |
3.2 |
43.6 |
16.1 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
25 |
25 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
26 |
13 |
2.6 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
26 |
15 |
6.0 |
20.0 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
16.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
26 |
22 |
4.5 |
21.5 |
3.4 |
14.1 |
18.1 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
27 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
22.6 |
3.6 |
22.0 |
19.0 |
(3.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
27 |
13 |
6.5 |
20.5 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
27 |
27 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
28 |
12 |
1.2 |
26.8 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
23.0 |
23.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
29 |
29 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
29 |
29 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
30 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
25.2 |
4.2 |
13.8 |
21.0 |
7.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
30 |
24 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
30 |
30 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
30 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
33 |
33 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
34 |
20 |
3.6 |
30.4 |
5.1 |
12.0 |
25.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
34 |
34 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
29.5 |
5.3 |
5.7 |
24.2 |
18.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
35 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
31.3 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
29.6 |
5.3 |
17.0 |
24.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
35 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
31.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
35 |
18 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
30.0 |
23.7 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
35 |
18 |
8.2 |
26.8 |
5.3 |
36.0 |
21.5 |
(14.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
35 |
35 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
35 |
35 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
35 |
35 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
35 |
35 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
35 |
35 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
36 |
36 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
36 |
36 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
36 |
36 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
37 |
37 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
37 |
37 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
38 |
38 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
38 |
38 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
39 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
39 |
24 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
39 |
39 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
39 |
39 |
7.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) |
591 |
|
$ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears |
40 |
10 |
6.8 |
33.2 |
6.3 |
13.0 |
26.9 |
13.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
40 |
12 |
7.2 |
32.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
26.5 |
26.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
40 |
26 |
7.0 |
33.0 |
6.3 |
4.8 |
27.0 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
40 |
40 |
4.1 |
35.9 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party |
40 |
40 |
12.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
21.4 |
21.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) |
1021 |
|
$ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K |
40 |
40 |
10.2 |
29.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K |
41 |
27 |
7.8 |
33.2 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.6 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K |
41 |
41 |
7.0 |
34.0 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.5 |
27.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) |
583 |
|
$ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year |
41.6 |
22.3 |
4.5 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII)
|
359 |
|
$ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year |
43 |
|
6.0 |
33.0 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.1 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
371 |
|
$ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K |
43 |
12 |
9.6 |
33.4 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.5 |
14.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K |
43 |
14 |
8.6 |
34.4 |
6.9 |
5.5 |
27.5 |
22.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) |
714 |
|
$ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare |
43 |
43 |
7.8 |
35.2 |
6.9 |
14.5 |
28.3 |
13.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K |
43.8 |
43.8 |
4 |
29.5 |
7.1 |
2.2 |
22.4 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears |
44 |
44 |
5.1 |
38.9 |
7.2 |
8.5 |
31.7 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) |
423 |
|
$ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award |
44 |
26 |
17.8 |
26.2 |
7.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII)
|
1484 |
|
$ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K |
45 |
26 |
9.1 |
37.4 |
7.4 |
10.1 |
30.0 |
19.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
635 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year |
45 |
45 |
4.8 |
40.2 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
32.8 |
32.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) |
387 |
|
$ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K |
47 |
12 |
8.0 |
39.0 |
8.9 |
24.0 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
669 |
|
$ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income |
47 |
47 |
8.5 |
38.5 |
8.9 |
32.0 |
29.6 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) |
710 |
|
$ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents |
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
35.3 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
47 |
47 |
10.4 |
36.6 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
|
$ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year |
47.1 |
47.1 |
8.0 |
39.1 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
30.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K |
48 |
36 |
5.4 |
42.6 |
11.8 |
3.2 |
30.8 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears |
49 |
49 |
12.9 |
35.1 |
12.1 |
19.0 |
23.0 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
1074 |
|
$ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K |
49.1 |
49.1 |
10.8 |
38.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) |
901 |
|
$ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K |
50 |
10 |
9.0 |
41.0 |
12.5 |
35.0 |
28.5 |
(6.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K |
50 |
35 |
10.1 |
39.9 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
x |
|
$ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed |
50 |
50 |
5.7 |
44.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) |
475 |
|
$ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji |
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
35.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
35.6 |
12.5 |
40.0 |
23.1 |
(16.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
50 |
10 |
13.8 |
36.2 |
12.5 |
4.7 |
23.7 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
1152 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
51 |
51 |
8.2 |
42.8 |
12.8 |
12.0 |
30.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII |
560 |
|
$ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year |
52 |
52 |
5.2 |
46.8 |
13.1 |
12.0 |
33.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) |
430 |
|
$ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year |
52 |
52 |
10.9 |
41.1 |
13.1 |
6.3 |
28.5 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) |
783 |
|
$ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year |
52.5 |
52.5 |
5.7 |
46.8 |
13.2 |
27.2 |
33.6 |
6.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) |
477 |
|
$ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K |
53 |
23 |
8.9 |
44.1 |
13.4 |
22.8 |
30.7 |
7.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
739 |
|
$ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K |
53 |
53 |
5.4 |
47.6 |
13.4 |
5.7 |
34.2 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
450 |
|
$ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year |
53 |
53 |
6.0 |
47.0 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.6 |
33.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K |
54 |
26.4 |
10.5 |
43.5 |
13.7 |
15.7 |
29.8 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII)
|
750 |
|
$ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs |
54 |
30 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) |
980 |
|
$ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K |
54 |
54 |
11.7 |
42.3 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII)
|
852 |
|
$ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K |
55 |
36 |
10.7 |
43.3 |
14.0 |
1.0 |
29.3 |
28.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
768 |
|
$ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K |
55 |
55 |
5.9 |
49.1 |
14.0 |
19.0 |
35.1 |
16.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) |
495 |
|
$ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year |
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
46.7 |
14.4 |
2.0 |
32.3 |
30.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
56 |
56 |
9.4 |
46.6 |
14.4 |
27.0 |
32.2 |
5.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII)
|
780 |
|
$ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award |
56 |
56 |
17.6 |
38.4 |
14.4 |
6.0 |
24.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
1463 |
|
$ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs |
57 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
51.2 |
14.6 |
5.7 |
36.6 |
30.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
58 |
9 |
4.8 |
53.2 |
15.0 |
48.0 |
38.2 |
(9.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance |
58 |
58 |
2.4 |
55.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year |
58 |
58 |
20.3 |
37.7 |
15.0 |
9.0 |
23.7 |
14.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) |
1358 |
|
$ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears |
59 |
59 |
10.3 |
48.7 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) |
858 |
|
Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare |
59.4 |
59.4 |
11.2 |
48.2 |
15.5 |
5.1 |
32.7 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) |
935 |
|
$ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year |
60 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
50.4 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
24.3 |
38.3 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII)
|
507 |
|
$ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year |
60 |
60 |
6.7 |
53.3 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
39.7 |
39.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K |
60 |
60 |
7.6 |
52.4 |
15.6 |
45.7 |
36.8 |
(8.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income |
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
2.1 |
38.3 |
36.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year |
60.8 |
60.8 |
6.2 |
54.6 |
15.8 |
20.8 |
38.8 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) |
514 |
|
$ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K |
61 |
61 |
10.4 |
50.6 |
15.9 |
4.5 |
34.7 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) |
863 |
|
$ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears |
62.9 |
62.9 |
16.0 |
44.9 |
16.5 |
1.4 |
28.4 |
27.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K |
63 |
63 |
17.4 |
45.6 |
16.5 |
71.0 |
29.1 |
(41.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) |
1120 |
|
$1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year |
63.2 |
63.2 |
6.4 |
57.0 |
16.6 |
0.0 |
40.4 |
40.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) |
531 |
|
$ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K |
65 |
46 |
5.6 |
59.4 |
17.1 |
10.0 |
42.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime |
66 |
66 |
8.4 |
57.6 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
40.2 |
40.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) |
696 |
|
$ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year |
66 |
66 |
14.9 |
51.1 |
17.4 |
20.2 |
33.7 |
13.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) |
908 |
|
$ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year |
67 |
33 |
7.2 |
59.8 |
17.8 |
11.0 |
42.0 |
31.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) |
603 |
|
$ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K |
67 |
67 |
12.6 |
54.4 |
17.8 |
7.9 |
36.6 |
28.7 |
|
|
c |
y |
Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) |
1048 |
|
$ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K |
67.3 |
67.3 |
16.0 |
51.3 |
17.9 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) |
1330 |
|
$ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year |
68. |
68 |
13.5 |
54.5 |
18.1 |
0.0 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) |
1123 |
|
$ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year |
69 |
12 |
14.4 |
54.6 |
18.4 |
14.0 |
36.2 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed |
71.3 |
71.3 |
7.9 |
63.4 |
19.1 |
0.0 |
44.3 |
44.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) |
656 |
|
$ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K |
72 |
14.4 |
7.9 |
64.1 |
19.3 |
7.9 |
44.8 |
36.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) |
661 |
|
$ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income |
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
73 |
41 |
7.2 |
65.8 |
20.8 |
0.0 |
45.0 |
45.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) |
596 |
|
$ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K |
75 |
26 |
8.2 |
66.8 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
45.4 |
45.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) |
680 |
|
$ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K |
75 |
75 |
9.3 |
65.7 |
21.4 |
2.7 |
44.3 |
41.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII)
|
778 |
|
$ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs |
75 |
75 |
7.3 |
67.7 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
46.3 |
46.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) |
606 |
|
$ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year |
77 |
34 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
42.9 |
42.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K |
77 |
77 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
66.9 |
42.9 |
(24.0) |
|
|
c |
o |
Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K |
80 |
35 |
9.1 |
69.9 |
23.1 |
0.0 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
719 |
|
$ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
80.1 |
76.4 |
12.5 |
67.6 |
23.2 |
0.0 |
44.4 |
44.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K |
81 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
72.2 |
23.4 |
2.8 |
48.8 |
46.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
81 |
35 |
7.6 |
73.4 |
23.4 |
0.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
643 |
|
$ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K |
81.7 |
81.7 |
16.3 |
65.4 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
40.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) |
1360 |
|
$ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs |
83 |
83 |
16.7 |
66.3 |
25.8 |
8.2 |
40.2 |
32.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) |
1392 |
|
$1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year |
83.3 |
83.3 |
15.1 |
68.2 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) |
1261 |
|
$ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K |
85 |
85 |
26.0 |
59.0 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
|
$ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K |
88 |
30 |
14.7 |
73.3 |
33.9 |
40.0 |
39.4 |
(0.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
894 |
|
$ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears |
90 |
13 |
9.7 |
80.3 |
34.7 |
30.0 |
45.6 |
15.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.)
|
806 |
|
Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
90 |
90 |
18.5 |
71.5 |
34.7 |
9.7 |
36.8 |
27.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) |
1209 |
|
$ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K |
96 |
28 |
14.4 |
81.6 |
37.3 |
28.0 |
44.3 |
16.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears |
99 |
58 |
11.1 |
87.9 |
38.6 |
0.0 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
927 |
|
$927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K |
100 |
60 |
10.6 |
89.4 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) |
877 |
|
$ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
101 |
101 |
10.7 |
90.3 |
39.5 |
9.7 |
58.5 |
49.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
889 |
|
$ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year |
110 |
110 |
18.1 |
91.4 |
44.1 |
0.0 |
47.3 |
47.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) |
1506 |
|
$ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year |
132 |
132 |
21.4 |
110.8 |
56.6 |
70.0 |
54.2 |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) |
1783 |
|
$ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year |
139 |
61 |
25.2 |
113.8 |
59.7 |
0.0 |
54.1 |
54.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
|
$1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year |
250 |
250 |
12.0 |
238.0 |
111.4 |
0.0 |
126.6 |
126.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year |
2000 |
2000 |
181.2 |
1818.8 |
928.0 |
0.0 |
890.0 |
890.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) |
15100 |
|
15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year |
76 |
76 |
24.5 |
51.5 |
21.8 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) |
1922 |
|
$ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her |
114 |
114 |
39.6 |
74.4 |
45.1 |
79.0 |
29.3 |
(49.7) |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed |
250 |
64 |
48.9 |
201.1 |
111.4 |
22.0 |
89.7 |
67.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) |
3400 |
|
3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K |
502 |
502 |
180.0 |
322.0 |
228.3 |
12.0 |
93.7 |
81.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) |
15000 |
|
15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed |
811 |
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared |
54 |
54 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
28.5 |
24.5 |
2.7 |
|
c |
s |
MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
982 |
|
$ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears |
41.9 |
41.9 |
15.5 |
25.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
18.7 |
18.7 |
3.3 |
|
c |
s |
Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) |
960 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year |
20.8 |
20.8 |
1.2 |
19.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
4.8 |
|
c |
o |
D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII)
|
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. |
84 |
75 |
12.5 |
71.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
7.3 |
|
c |
s |
Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy |
31.2 |
31.2 |
3.4 |
27.8 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
23.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
|
c |
o |
Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. |
281 |
|
$ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year |
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
20.4 |
8.4 |
10 |
|
c |
s |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year |
38 |
38 |
5.0 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
3.2 |
27.1 |
23.9 |
10 |
|
c |
o |
Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) |
415 |
|
$ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K |
18.7 |
18.7 |
5.6 |
13.1 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11 |
|
c |
o |
Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) |
463 |
|
$ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K |
40 |
40 |
7.7 |
32.3 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
26.0 |
14.0 |
12 |
|
c |
s |
Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) |
645 |
|
$ 345 per month in child support and $ 300 in s.7 expenses, arrears, restraining order, mans income 40 K wifes 12 K |
45.4 |
45.4 |
7.7 |
37.7 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
30.2 |
28.0 |
12 |
|
c |
o |
Kocko v. Kocko, 2004 CanLII 12571 (ON C.J.) |
641 |
|
$ 391 per month child support changed from temporary order of $ 920 per month, $ 250 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 45.4 K, wifes income 12 K per year, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 expense |
50 |
50 |
8.4 |
41.6 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
29.1 |
29.1 |
12 |
|
c |
s |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 21793 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 300 per month contribution to RESP and pays mortgage and insurance, man makes 50 K and wife makes 12 K per year |
42 |
42 |
4.6 |
37.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
13 |
|
c |
o |
Buckner v. Card, 2007 ONCJ 51 (CanLII)
|
386 |
|
$ 386 per month child support, wife and child live in Alberta, man has 42 K income wife makes 13 K per year |
27.9 |
27.9 |
4.2 |
23.7 |
3.8 |
12.0 |
19.9 |
7.9 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) |
350 |
|
$ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K |
35.8 |
25 |
9.6 |
26.2 |
5.4 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) |
800 |
|
$ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K |
15.6 |
8.5 |
3.0 |
12.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.6 |
12.6 |
16 |
|
c |
o |
Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII)
|
248 |
|
$ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
51 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
42.4 |
12.8 |
11.5 |
29.6 |
18.1 |
16 |
|
c |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
|
$ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
66 |
66 |
14.2 |
51.8 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
34.4 |
34.4 |
17 |
|
c |
s |
Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) |
1183 |
|
$ 844 child support per month and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wifes income 17 K per year before support |
105 |
105 |
15.0 |
89.0 |
41.2 |
0.0 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
18 |
|
c |
s |
Potyrala v. Potyrala, 2007 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) |
916 |
|
$ 916 per month interim child support, retroactivity to be decided at trial, 85 % s.7 expenses, mans income 105 K wifes income 18 K |
47 |
47 |
5.0 |
42.0 |
8.9 |
6.8 |
33.1 |
26.3 |
18.3 |
|
c |
s |
Paul v. Misselbrook, 2006 CanLII 13553 (ON S.C.) |
414 |
|
$ 414 per month child support, 6.8 K retroactive award, mans income 47 K and wife earns 18.3 K |
25 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
22.3 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
19.1 |
19.1 |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
|
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K |
46.5 |
46.5 |
5.4 |
41.1 |
8.8 |
19.0 |
32.3 |
13.3 |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Glomba v. Wray, 2003 CanLII 1960 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 400 child support and $ 66 daycare expense, mans income 46.5 K and wife earns 19 K, arrears |
100 |
82 |
9.3 |
90.7 |
39.1 |
7.0 |
51.6 |
44.6 |
20 |
|
c |
s |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
773 |
|
$773 child support and s.7 daycare expenses, $ 850 interim spousal support terminated, claim for unequal division rejected, man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife has 20 K income, 7 K costs |
120 |
115 |
6.0 |
114.0 |
47.8 |
0.0 |
66.2 |
66.2 |
21 |
|
c |
s |
Duggan v. Elson, 2007 CanLII 45910 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, man claims 115 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife has 21 K income per year |
85 |
65 |
24.7 |
60.3 |
32.6 |
9.7 |
27.7 |
18.0 |
21.6 |
|
c |
s |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) |
1380 |
|
1.2 K child support and $ 180 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 65 K and is imputed to 85 K, wife has income of 21.6 K |
56 |
40 |
9.3 |
46.7 |
14.3 |
0.0 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 child support, 2.9 K arrears expunged, man claims income of 40 K imputed to 56 K, wife earns 22 K per year |
59 |
59 |
9.6 |
39.4 |
15.3 |
8.0 |
24.1 |
16.1 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Roy v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 18693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support to be reduced to $ 509, father must pay 8 K of university expenses, fathers income 59 K and mothers income 22 K |
46 |
34 |
5.4 |
40.6 |
8.7 |
4.0 |
27.9 |
23.9 |
23 |
|
c |
o |
McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) |
446 |
|
$ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs |
43.7 |
43.7 |
7.4 |
36.3 |
7.1 |
9.3 |
29.0 |
19.7 |
23.7 |
|
c |
s |
Ricketts v. Thomas, 2004 CanLII 12990 (ON S.C.) |
619 |
|
$ 619 per month child support, no order for spousal support, 9.3 retroactive arrears with some due to Ont Works, mans income 43.7 K and wifes is 23.7 K |
50.8 |
50.8 |
5.3 |
45.5 |
12.7 |
7.0 |
32.8 |
25.8 |
24 |
|
c |
s |
Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.)
|
438 |
|
$ 216 per month child support and $ 222 per month s.7 expense, 7 K retroactive arrears, mans income 50.8 K per year and wife has income of 24 K |
55 |
55 |
9.0 |
46.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
24 |
|
c |
s |
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2006 CanLII 19439 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, man makes 55 K and wife makes 24 K per year |
64 |
64 |
10.8 |
53.2 |
16.8 |
190.0 |
36.4 |
(153.6) |
24 |
|
c |
s |
Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
900 |
|
$ 900 per month child support and 180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, 10 K costs, 180 K spousal support lump sum, man makes 64 K and wife makes 24 K |
200 |
134 |
19.7 |
180.3 |
88.2 |
26.8 |
92.1 |
65.3 |
24 |
|
c |
o |
A.(L.C.) v. A.(R.J.), 2003 CanLII 52484 (ON C.J.) |
1308 |
|
$ 1308 per month child support, 86 % s.7 expenses, arrears 26.8 K, father claims 134 K income and is imputed to 200 K, mother makes 24 K, |
55 |
55 |
7.6 |
47.4 |
14.0 |
2.9 |
33.4 |
30.5 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 1976 (ON S.C.) |
635 |
|
$ 468 child support for remaining dependant, must pay 2 K directly to older daughter, 2.9 K arrears, man makes 55 K and wife makes 26 K per year |
60 |
60 |
6.0 |
54.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Lee v. Lee, 2006 CanLII 5612 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 child support, $ 500 spousal, child support ended, man makes 60 K and wife makes 26 K |
72 |
72 |
9.6 |
62.4 |
19.3 |
28.7 |
43.1 |
14.4 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, retroactive 23 K lump sum award, retroactive arrears, mans income 72 K and wifes income 26 K |
275 |
275 |
24.8 |
250.2 |
123.0 |
24.0 |
127.0 |
103.0 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Cowie v. Makin, 2004 CanLII 5762 (ON S.C.) |
2065 |
|
$ 2065 per month in child support, 24 K arrears set against equalization, mans income 275 K and wifes income changed from 110 K to 26 K per year |
33 |
33 |
3.5 |
29.5 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
28 |
|
c |
o |
Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) |
294 |
|
$ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K |
53.4 |
53.4 |
5.9 |
47.5 |
13.5 |
1.4 |
34.0 |
32.6 |
28 |
|
c |
s |
Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) |
494 |
|
$ 494 per month child support, arrears 1.4 K, mans income 53.4 K and wifes income 28 K |
35 |
35 |
10.7 |
24.3 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
19.0 |
16.5 |
29.1 |
|
c |
s |
McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
893 |
|
Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year |
28 |
28 |
9.5 |
18.5 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
14.7 |
11.7 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) |
789 |
|
$ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year |
48 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
42.3 |
11.8 |
14.0 |
30.5 |
16.5 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
$ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year |
58 |
58 |
7.5 |
50.5 |
14.9 |
18.2 |
36.5 |
18.3 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
L.K. v. G.K., 2007 CanLII 9612 (ON S.C.) |
496 |
|
$ 496 per month child support, s.7 expenses, change of residence of child to mother, father owes 18.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K and womans income 30 K |
5000 |
5000 |
228.0 |
4772.0 |
2315.8 |
0.0 |
2456.2 |
2456.2 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Quinn v. Keiper, 2005 CanLII 43685 (ON S.C.) |
19000 |
|
10 million equalization, 5 K per month child support, father pays between 10 and 18.5 K per month s.7 expenses, man makes 5000 K and wife makes 30 K per year |
179 |
179 |
19.6 |
159.4 |
78.4 |
25.0 |
81.0 |
56.0 |
30.3 |
|
c |
s |
Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
|
1.3 K per month child support, 87 % of s.7 expenses, 25 K, arrears, fathers income 179 K and mothers income 30.3 K per year |
39 |
39 |
8.9 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
24.0 |
18.3 |
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)
|
740 |
|
$ 740 per month child support, retroactive arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum, refused set off with 37 % of time, man earns 39 K wife earns 30.5 K |
44.7 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Sills v. Sills, 2002 CanLII 2705 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Guideline support for 3 children and an unspecified portion of s.7 expenses, father earns 44.7 K and mother earns 30.5 K per year |
49.5 |
49.5 |
7.8 |
41.7 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
Simmonds v. Simmonds, 2007 CanLII 8007 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 450 per month and $ 200 per month in s.7 expenses, father earns 49.5 K and mother earns 31 K |
138 |
138 |
23.7 |
114.3 |
59.4 |
0.0 |
54.9 |
54.9 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
McCrea v. McCrea, 2005 CanLII 378 (ON S.C.) |
1640 |
|
$ 1640 per month child support reduced from $ 2850, s.7 expenses, father has 138 K income and mother has 31 K income |
66.3 |
66.3 |
11.9 |
54.4 |
17.5 |
4.9 |
36.5 |
31.6 |
32 |
|
c |
s |
Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) |
992 |
|
$ 992 per month child support, husband makes $ 1400 per month mortgage payments too, mans income 66.3 K and wifes income 32 K per year |
1624 |
0.0 |
121.2 |
1502.8 |
749.1 |
22.0 |
753.7 |
731.7 |
33.7 |
|
c |
s |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
10100 |
|
10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year |
49 |
49 |
11.2 |
37.8 |
12.1 |
2.0 |
25.7 |
23.7 |
34.0 |
|
c |
s |
B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) |
806 |
|
$ 683 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses, father earns 49 K mother earns 34 K, costs 2 K |
65 |
65 |
14.2 |
50.8 |
17.1 |
0.0 |
33.7 |
33.7 |
35.0 |
|
c |
s |
Jones v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 23318 (ON S.C.) |
1182 |
|
$ 2260 per month child support reduced to $ 1182 by separation agreement, man makes 65 K and wife makes 35 K per year |
116 |
25 |
14.6 |
101.4 |
46.0 |
21.1 |
55.4 |
34.3 |
35.0 |
|
c |
o |
Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) |
880 |
|
$ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs |
40 |
40 |
3.9 |
36.1 |
6.3 |
5.7 |
29.8 |
24.1 |
35.6 |
|
c |
o |
Cook v. Cleverdon, 2005 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) |
325 |
|
$ 325 per month child support, retroactive arrears, father pays $ 300 in support for other children from other marriages also, mothers income 35.6 K and fathers income 40 K |
23.5 |
23.5 |
5.2 |
18.3 |
2.8 |
5.7 |
15.5 |
9.8 |
35.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.)
|
435 |
|
$ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K |
45.0 |
45 |
9.3 |
35.7 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
28.3 |
28.3 |
36.0 |
|
c |
s |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and $ 140 s.7 expenses, mans income 45 K per year and wifes income is 36 K per year |
43.9 |
43.9 |
10.1 |
33.8 |
7.1 |
16.9 |
26.7 |
9.8 |
37.4 |
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) |
843 |
|
$ 763 per month child support plus $ 80 per month s.7 expenses, 3.2 K retroactive arrears and 10.4 K arrears, mans income 43.9 K and wifes income 37.4 K per year, 3.3 K costs |
46 |
46 |
10.6 |
35.4 |
8.7 |
6.5 |
26.7 |
20.2 |
37.6 |
|
c |
s |
Cava v. Cava, 2005 CanLII 19815 (ON S.C.) |
760 |
|
$ 660 for both children and 1.2 K per year s.7 expense and $ 859 retroactive s.7 expense, arrears, retroactive monthly award, mans income 46 K and wifes income 37.6 K per year |
28 |
23 |
3.0 |
25.0 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
21.2 |
21.2 |
37.9 |
|
c |
o |
Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K |
70 |
18.5 |
9.2 |
60.8 |
18.7 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
38 |
|
c |
o |
Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) |
766 |
|
$ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K |
94 |
94 |
12.0 |
82.0 |
36.5 |
0.0 |
45.5 |
45.5 |
38.2 |
|
c |
s |
Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2187 (ON S.C.)
|
998 |
|
$ 998 total child support per month including $ 277 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 94 K and wifes income 38.2 K per year |
154 |
154 |
63.3 |
90.1 |
66.8 |
40.0 |
23.3 |
(16.7) |
38.5 |
|
c |
s |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
4600 |
|
4.6 K per month child support including 75 % s.7 expenses, 40 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 154 K per year and wife makes 38.5 K |
138 |
138 |
24.0 |
114.0 |
59.4 |
40.0 |
54.6 |
14.6 |
39.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bond v. Bond, 2007 CanLII 41898 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
2000 |
|
2 K per month for 2 children, retroactive child support of 40 K, mans income 138 K per year and wifes income 39 K per year |
22 |
11 |
9.2 |
12.8 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
39.4 |
|
c |
s |
Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year |
31.9 |
31.9 |
7.2 |
24.7 |
4.6 |
19.0 |
20.1 |
1.1 |
39.6 |
|
c |
o |
Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) |
478 |
|
$ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears |
77 |
77 |
19.9 |
57.1 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
40 |
|
c |
s |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) |
1659 |
|
$ 1001 per month child support and special expenses up to $ 658 per month, husband earns 77 K per year and wife earns 40 K per year |
175 |
20 |
12.1 |
162.9 |
76.6 |
59.0 |
86.3 |
27.3 |
40 |
|
c |
y |
Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) |
1010 |
|
$ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income |
777 |
777 |
107.7 |
669.3 |
356.0 |
0.0 |
313.3 |
313.4 |
40 |
|
c |
s |
Bladwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 878 (ON S.C.) |
8300 |
|
8.3 K per month child support and 95 % of s.7 expenses |
221 |
221 |
47.4 |
173.6 |
97.9 |
(16.3) |
75.7 |
92.0 |
41.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zimmerman v. Doe, 2007 CanLII 28755 (ON S.C.) |
3977 |
|
$ 2500 per month child support and s.7 expenses of $ 1477 per month and reimbursement for 16.3 K prior s.7 expenses, man makes 221 K per year and wife makes 41.9 K |
37 |
22 |
9.8 |
27.2 |
5.7 |
0.0 |
21.5 |
21.5 |
42 |
|
c |
s |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
820 |
|
$ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year |
56 |
56 |
8.8 |
47.2 |
14.3 |
(6.4) |
32.9 |
39.3 |
42 |
|
c |
s |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) |
731 |
|
$ 731 per month child support, overpayment of 6.4 K, mans income is 56 K and wifes income is 42 K per year |
127 |
127 |
22.8 |
104.2 |
50.8 |
11.7 |
53.4 |
41.7 |
43.8 |
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) |
1897 |
|
$ 1721 per month child support, $ 176 s.7 expense per month and 2 K retroactive award, retroactive arrears, fathers income 126.6 K mothers income 43.8 K per year |
42 |
42 |
4.9 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
46 |
|
c |
s |
Kimmerly v. Parks, 2005 CanLII 40368 (ON S.C.) |
410 |
|
$ 410 total child support per month, 9 K arrears to be paid $ 100 per month, $ 48 per month s.7 expenses retroactive, mans income 42 K and wife earns 46 K per year, |
100 |
100 |
27.0 |
73.0 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
33.9 |
33.9 |
46.1 |
|
c |
s |
Johnson v. Castellano, 2006 CanLII 34434 (ON S.C.) |
2250 |
|
$ 1825 per month child support and $ 425 per month s.7 expenses, man is given support reduction for lower earnings due to depression but must now assume former income, wife makes 46.1 K per year |
161 |
117 |
24.2 |
136.8 |
70.1 |
70.0 |
65.3 |
(47.0) |
46.3 |
|
c |
s |
Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) |
2020 |
|
$ 2020 per month child support, 70 K lump sum spousal support, man makes 161 K and wife makes 46.3 K per year, man must continue to pay on separation agreement despite claiming lower 117 K income |
50 |
50 |
12.0 |
38.0 |
12.5 |
30.0 |
25.5 |
(4.5) |
47 |
|
c |
s |
Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) |
1003 |
|
$ 753 per month child support and 3 K per year s.7 expenses, 19 K arrears, mans income 50 K, wife earns 47 K per year, 11 K costs |
89 |
89 |
16.8 |
72.2 |
34.3 |
18.0 |
37.9 |
19.9 |
47.9 |
|
c |
s |
Clarke v. Clarke, 2007 CanLII 50596 (ON S.C.) |
1063 |
|
$ 1063 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 18 K arrears, man makes 89 K and wife makes 47.9 K |
60.6 |
0.0 |
11.5 |
49.1 |
15.8 |
2.8 |
33.3 |
30.5 |
48.8 |
|
c |
s |
Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
830 |
|
$ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year |
53.5 |
53.5 |
7.0 |
46.5 |
13.6 |
5.7 |
32.9 |
27.2 |
49 |
|
c |
s |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 580 per month child support plus retroactive arrears of 5.7 K, fathers income 53.5 K and mothers income 49 K |
80 |
80 |
18.9 |
61.1 |
21.8 |
25.0 |
39.3 |
14.3 |
49 |
|
c |
s |
Zlatar v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 22344 (ON S.C.) |
1241 |
|
$ 908 per month child support, 4 K per year s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears, man makes 80 K and wife makes 49 K per year. |
40 |
20 |
8.8 |
31.2 |
6.3 |
9.6 |
24.9 |
15.3 |
50 |
|
c |
o |
Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII)
|
737 |
|
$ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K |
70 |
70 |
19.9 |
50.1 |
18.7 |
9.5 |
31.4 |
21.9 |
50 |
|
c |
o |
Griffiths v. Griffiths, 2007 ONCJ 26 (CanLII) |
1322 |
|
$ 1322 per month child support plus dental expense, 9.5 K arrears, man makes 70 K and wife makes 50 K per year |
54 |
54 |
10.6 |
43.4 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
29.7 |
25.7 |
52.0 |
|
c |
s |
Dodd v. Dodd, 2003 CanLII 2100 (ON S.C.) |
755 |
|
$ 755 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears, fathers income 54 K and wifes income 52 K per year |
49 |
49 |
9.9 |
39.1 |
12.1 |
9.7 |
27.0 |
17.3 |
53.0 |
|
c |
o |
Hillier v. Hillier, 2005 ONCJ 120 (CanLII) |
700 |
|
$ 700 per month child support, 9.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 49 K wife makes 53 K per year |
290 |
290 |
39.6 |
250.4 |
129.9 |
50.0 |
120.1 |
70.1 |
54.0 |
|
c |
s |
Monaghan v. Monaghan, 2002 CanLII 2676 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
3.3 K per month child support, man pays 50 K per year of childrens university expenses, man makes 290 K and wife makes 54 K per year |
66 |
31 |
6.6 |
59.4 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
42.0 |
42.0 |
57 |
|
c |
s |
Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) |
550 |
|
$ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K |
147 |
147 |
39.3 |
107.7 |
63.6 |
25.0 |
44.1 |
19.1 |
57 |
|
c |
s |
Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2311 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
2.6 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears,mans income 147 K including overtime and wifes income 57 K per year |
36 |
36 |
6.5 |
29.5 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
24.0 |
21.6 |
60 |
|
c |
s |
L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) |
545 |
|
$ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K |
30.5 |
30.5 |
8.2 |
22.3 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
60.9 |
|
c |
s |
Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K |
50 |
50 |
9.3 |
40.7 |
12.5 |
7.2 |
28.2 |
21.0 |
61 |
|
c |
s |
Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) |
777 |
|
$ 777 per month child support, 7.2 K arrears, man makes 50 K and wife makes 61 K |
61 |
61 |
10.6 |
50.4 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
63 |
|
c |
o |
Bertram v. Murdock, 2006 ONCJ 69 (CanLII |
880 |
|
$ 531 child support when child is at home and $ 406 when at school, $ 4550 per year tuition expenses, father makes 61 K and mother makes 63 K per year |
150 |
150 |
31.2 |
118.8 |
65.0 |
0.0 |
53.8 |
53.8 |
63 |
|
c |
s |
Ruel v. Juodis, 2005 CanLII 14133 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
$ 1233 per month child support and $ 675 s.7 expense and $ 690 discretionary extra expense per month, man makes 150 K and wife makes 40 K and is imputed to 63 K per year |
50 |
12 |
13.4 |
36.6 |
12.5 |
19.0 |
24.1 |
5.1 |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
1116 |
|
$ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K |
63.7 |
40 |
12.0 |
51.7 |
16.7 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) |
996 |
|
$ 866 child support with $ 130 s.7 expenses, man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 63.7 K, wifes income 64 K per year |
30 |
30 |
9.9 |
20.1 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
65 |
|
c |
s |
R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) |
827 |
|
$ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K |
40 |
6.5 |
11.0 |
29.0 |
6.3 |
49.5 |
22.7 |
(26.8) |
65 |
|
c |
s |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
920 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears |
54 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
48.6 |
13.7 |
54.0 |
34.9 |
(19.1) |
65 |
|
c |
y |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.)
|
454 |
|
$ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs |
73.5 |
73.5 |
6.9 |
66.6 |
20.9 |
61.6 |
45.7 |
(15.9) |
65.5 |
|
c |
s |
Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) |
577 |
|
$ 577 per month child support and 4.5 K additional retroactive s.7 expense, 57.1 K lump sum award, wife may reapply for periodic support, man makes 73.5 K and wife makes 65.5 K per year |
118 |
118 |
14.9 |
103.1 |
46.9 |
19.0 |
56.2 |
37.2 |
67.0 |
|
c |
s |
Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) |
1245 |
|
$ 1020 child support and $ 225 s.7 expenses. 19 K retroactive arrears, man makes 118 K and wife makes 67 K |
61 |
61 |
9.2 |
51.8 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
35.9 |
35.9 |
69.0 |
|
c |
s |
Matwiyw v. Matwiyw, 2004 CanLII 7764 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 841 child support order varied to $ 770, fathers income 61 K mothers income 69 K |
165 |
165 |
27.7 |
137.3 |
71.9 |
3.9 |
65.4 |
61.5 |
75 |
|
c |
o |
Osmak-Bonk v. Bonk, 2004 ONCJ 167 (CanLII) |
2305 |
|
1.93 K per month child support and 9.4 K s.7 expense, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears 3.9 K, arrears, mans income 165 K, wifes income is 75 K per year |
320 |
320 |
50.1 |
269.9 |
143.9 |
53.0 |
125.1 |
72.1 |
75 |
|
c |
s |
Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) |
3500 |
|
3.5 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 28 K retroactive lump sum spousal support, man earns 25 K compensatory lump sum support, 320 K and wife earns 75 K per year |
559 |
559 |
46.5 |
512.5 |
254.8 |
22.0 |
257.2 |
235.2 |
76 |
|
c |
s |
Werden v. Werden, 2005 CanLII 45741 (ON S.C.) |
3875 |
|
3.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 559 K per year and wifes income 76 K per year |
139 |
139 |
12.0 |
127.0 |
59.9 |
0.0 |
67.1 |
67.1 |
91 |
|
c |
y |
Park v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 14132 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support in trust fund, man makes 139 K and wife makes 91 K, s.7 expenses, 70 K retroactive arrears overturned on appeal |
100 |
15 |
21.8 |
78.2 |
20.7 |
11.0 |
57.5 |
46.5 |
96.0 |
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
1820 |
|
$ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs |
88.2 |
30 |
9.8 |
78.4 |
18.0 |
12.0 |
60.4 |
48.4 |
120.0 |
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
694 |
|
$ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K |
90 |
90 |
10.0 |
80.0 |
34.7 |
9.1 |
45.3 |
36.2 |
182 |
|
c |
s |
Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) |
832 |
|
$ 832 now directly payable to daughter, s.7 expenses, 9.1 K retroactive arrears payable to mother from funds held for equalization, husband makes 90 K and wife makes 182 K per year |
787 |
328 |
117.6 |
669.4 |
360.6 |
22.0 |
308.8 |
286.8 |
193 |
|
c |
s |
Howe v. Tremblay, 2007 CanLII 44350 (ON S.C.) |
9800 |
|
5.7 K per month child support and 4.1 K per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims 328 K income and is imputed to 767 K as non recurring income is included, wifes income is 193 K per year |
769 |
769 |
106.5 |
662.5 |
352.3 |
107.0 |
310.2 |
203.2 |
270 |
|
c |
s |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) |
8200 |
|
72 K retroactive arrears of child support, 35 K retroactive arrears 75 % of s.7 expenses, 8.2 K per month child support, man makes 769 K per year and wife makes 270 K |
151 |
151 |
19.0 |
132.0 |
65.4 |
24.9 |
66.6 |
41.7 |
290.0 |
|
c |
s |
Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) |
1250 |
|
$ 1250 child support per month, 34 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, fathers income grossed up to 151.8 K and mothers 289.5 K per year, 15.2 K costs |
5500 |
745 |
276.0 |
5224.0 |
2547.9 |
951.0 |
2676.1 |
1725.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) |
23000 |
|
Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year |