Legend
1 – Court Ordered Payors Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 – Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 – Total Support Ordered per Month in $’s
4 – Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
5 – Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
6 – Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
7 Child Support per Month in $’s
8 Spousal Support per Month in $’s
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Case |
7 CS |
8 SS |
Outcome |
|
24.6 |
24.6 |
19.8 |
4.8 |
1.4 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lear v. Lear, 2004 CanLII 14820 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
650 |
$ 1000 child support and $ 650 spousal support from man with 24.6 K per year claimed income |
|
30 |
30 |
5.5 |
24.5 |
3.7 |
0.8 |
20.8 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
Bouchard v. Ouellet, 2005 ONCJ 335 (CanLII) |
266 |
192 |
$ 266 per month child support and $ 192 spousal support, man does not give financial figures and is imputed to an income of 30 K, 3 months retroactive support |
|
34 |
26 |
9.5 |
24.5 |
5.0 |
11.9 |
19.5 |
7.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
DeFina v. DeFina, 2007 ONCJ 94 (CanLII) |
660 |
129 |
$ 660 per month child support and $ 129 spousal support, 1 year and 3 months retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income imputed to 34 K |
|
35 |
35 |
12.4 |
24.1 |
4.1 |
6.3 |
20.0 |
13.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elizabeth Ann Zunti v. Ian George McIntosh, 2004 CanLII 19511 (ON S.C.) |
506 |
400 |
$ 506 per month child support and $ 400 per month spousal support, 7 months retroactive, s.7 expenses, mans income 35 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
8.6 |
27.4 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
20.9 |
20.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Mahood v. Mahood, 2005 CanLII 19841 (ON S.C.) |
518 |
200 |
$ 518 child support to be reduced to $ 313 when child graduates, $ 200 spousal support, mans income 36 K per year |
|
38.8 |
38.8 |
11.8 |
27.0 |
4.7 |
19.0 |
22.3 |
3.3 |
|
|
b |
o |
Gregory v. Brown, 2005 ONCJ 284 (CanLII) |
554 |
433 |
$ 554 child support and 433 spousal support, arrears not rescinded, mans income 38.8 K |
|
42.7 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
29.4 |
5.4 |
12.2 |
24.0 |
11.8 |
|
|
b |
o |
T.R. v. R.T., 2006 ONCJ 173 (CanLII) |
605 |
500 |
$ 605 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support, man quits job and claims no income and is imputed at 42.7 K per year, 11 months retroactive arrears |
|
43 |
43 |
10.2 |
32.8 |
6.1 |
42.5 |
26.7 |
(15.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Connors v. Connors, 2006 CanLII 17597 (ON S.C.) |
651 |
200 |
$ 651 child support per month and $ 200 spousal support, arrears 42.5 K, enforcement action by FRO, man makes 43 K |
|
45 |
45 |
15.9 |
29.1 |
5.6 |
3.5 |
23.5 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
M.S. v. I.S., 2003 CanLII 2239 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
900 |
$ 300 child support and $ 900 spousal support, s.7 expenses, arrears reduced from 5.4 K to 3.5 K,.mans income 45 K |
|
45.9 |
45.9 |
12.5 |
33.4 |
6.8 |
31.6 |
26.6 |
(5.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
880 |
160 |
$ 880 per month child support and $ 160 spousal support, arrears partly rescinded, mans income 45.9 K per year, costs 12.6 K |
|
46 |
46 |
16.8 |
31.2 |
4.8 |
1.3 |
26.4 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Millward v. Millward, 2003 CanLII 2116 (ON S.C.) |
396 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 396 per month child support 1.3 K s.7 expense, short marrige, short marriage, mans income 46 K |
|
50 |
50 |
15.4 |
34.6 |
5.9 |
2.5 |
28.7 |
26.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
435 |
850 |
$ 850 spousal support and $ 435 child support, 2.5 K in lump sum support, non depletion order, disability and pension imputed to 50 K |
|
50 |
50 |
23.8 |
26.2 |
5.6 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stigter v. Stigter, 2006 CanLII 43638 (ON S.C.) |
986 |
1000 |
$ 986 per month interim child support and $ 1000 per month spousal support based on income of 50 K |
|
51 |
0.0 |
17.1 |
33.9 |
6.5 |
11.9 |
27.4 |
15.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
713 |
$ 713 spousal support and $ 713 child support and $ 2300 s.7 expense award and 9.6 K retroactive arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K |
|
52 |
52 |
11.1 |
40.9 |
12.1 |
2.8 |
28.8 |
26.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Willson v. Willson, 2003 CanLII 2273 (ON S.C.) |
726 |
200 |
$ 726 child support and $ 200 spousal support based on income of 52 K, 3 months of retoractive spousal support |
|
52.3 |
52.3 |
9.0 |
43.3 |
12.1 |
0.0 |
31.2 |
31.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2005 CanLII 8705 (ON S.C.) |
450 |
300 |
$ 450 child support and $ 300 spousal support, mans income 52.3 K |
|
53.8 |
53.8 |
16.5 |
37.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
25.1 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Van Bilsen v. Van Bilsen, 2003 CanLII 2012 (ON S.C.) |
979 |
400 |
$ 979 child support per month and $ 400 spousal support, mans income 53.8 K, wife remarries a man with a 50 K income |
|
56.7 |
56.7 |
13.8 |
42.9 |
12.6 |
1.2 |
30.3 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Newton v. Newton, 2007 CanLII 48990 (ON S.C.)
|
623 |
526 |
623 spousal support, 526 child support based on 56.7 K income and 1 child, 1.2 K retroactive arrears |
|
57 |
57 |
26.4 |
30.6 |
6.5 |
71.1 |
24.1 |
(47.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
Wilson-Tick v. Tick, 2006 CanLII 12964 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
1333 |
$ 866 per month child support, and 16 K per year or more spousal support, man has custody, 28.3 K spousal support arrears and 45.8 K child support arrears, mans income 57 K |
|
58 |
58 |
25.8 |
32.2 |
6.6 |
22.0 |
25.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
Johnson v. Johnson, 2005 ONCJ 325 (CanLII) |
752 |
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support and $ 752 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K |
|
59 |
59 |
22.6 |
36.4 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
27.5 |
17.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
881 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 881 child support, arrears 10 K, man makes 59 K per year |
|
60 |
40 |
7.3 |
52.7 |
15.5 |
16.5 |
37.2 |
20.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
100 |
$ 507 per month child support and $ 100 per month spousal support, 16.5 K arrears, man claims 40 K and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
39.4 |
12.3 |
4.0 |
27.1 |
23.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
E.K. v. I.K., 2005 CanLII 26319 (ON C.J.) |
883 |
883 |
$ 883 child support and $ 833 spousal support, man claims no income and is imputed to 60 K, retroactive arrears including 4.5 K owed to Social Services |
|
60 |
25 |
15.9 |
44.1 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.) |
1076 |
250 |
$ 1076 per month child support and $ 250 interim spousal support, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
60 |
54.0 |
6.0 |
3.8 |
53.0 |
2.2 |
(50.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
3500 |
3.5 K spousal support per month, child support lowered to 1 K per month and s.7 expenses, 53 K retroactive arrears including 20 K lump sum spousal support, 50 K additional income imputed during previous order, man agrees to 60 K income |
|
60 |
53 |
26.4 |
33.6 |
10.7 |
0.0 |
22.9 |
22.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Humphrey v. Humphrey, 2006 CanLII 42709 (ON S.C.)
|
900 |
1300 |
$ 1300 spousal support per month and $ 900 child support per month, man claims 53 K per year income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
63 |
63 |
20.2 |
42.8 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
27.8 |
27.8 |
|
|
b |
s |
Manning v. Bain, 2007 CanLII 27974 (ON S.C.) |
1287 |
400 |
$ 1287 per month child support for 3 children and $ 400 spousal support based on income of 63 K |
|
63.5 |
63.5 |
21.8 |
41.7 |
13.2 |
32.0 |
28.5 |
(3.5) |
|
|
b |
s |
G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.) |
876 |
939 |
$ 876 per month child support of which 390 per month is s.7 expense and arrears and $ 939 spousal support with 13 K arrears, mans income is 63.5 K per year |
|
65 |
65 |
24.6 |
40.4 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
31.7 |
31.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Clement v. Clement, 2007 CanLII 12686 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
1450 |
$ 1450 spousal support per month and $ 600 per month child support based on an income of 65 K per year |
|
68 |
60 |
24.1 |
43.9 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Spicer v. Benoit-Spicer, 2004 CanLII 11631 (ON S.C. |
9070 |
1100 |
$ 907 per month child support and $ 1100 per month spousal support, man claims 60 K income but must pay on fomer 68 K per year amount |
|
72 |
72 |
23.5 |
48.5 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
32.9 |
32.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Billings v. Billings, 2004 CanLII 5029 (ON S.C.) |
957 |
1000 |
$ 957 per month interim child support and $ 1000 K spousal support, mans income 72 K |
|
73 |
73 |
31.1 |
41.9 |
18.1 |
3.4 |
23.7 |
20.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2006 CanLII 9984 (ON S.C.) |
x |
400 |
$ 958 per month child support and $ 400 spousal support, s.7 expenses, 3.4 K arrears, man makes 73 K |
|
73 |
59 |
25.2 |
47.8 |
14.7 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
R.S.H. v. P.W.H., 2006 CanLII 23958 (ON S.C.) |
1083 |
1317 |
$ 1083 child support per month and $ 1317 spousal support, man claims an income of 59 K and is imputed to 73 K |
|
75 |
75 |
14.0 |
61.0 |
18.4 |
9.7 |
42.6 |
31.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.) |
666 |
500 |
$ 666 per month interim child support and $ 500 spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income 75 K per year |
|
78 |
78 |
17.1 |
60.9 |
18.2 |
0.0 |
42.7 |
42.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Donaldson v. Dénommée, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.) |
625 |
800 |
$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year |
|
78 |
45 |
43.0 |
35.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
19.6 |
19.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.) |
2183 |
1500 |
$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K per year |
|
79 |
79 |
18.4 |
60.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
y |
Marson v. Marson, 2001 CanLII 8534 (ON C.A.) |
1200 |
|
2.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 child support per month and s.7 expenses, man makes 79 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
14.9 |
65.1 |
19.0 |
0.0 |
46.1 |
46.1 |
|
|
b |
o |
Foster v. Foster, 2004 ONCJ 114 (CanLII) |
639 |
600 |
$ 600 spousal and $ 639 child, mans income 80 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 39754 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
80 K imputed income for child support purposes for 2 children, $ 500 spousal support per month |
|
84.1 |
84.1 |
28.8 |
55.3 |
16.7 |
22.0 |
38.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Giles v. Giles, 2002 CanLII 2785 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
1700 |
1.7 spousal support per month, 0.7 child support per month, retroactive arrears, man makes 84.1 K income per year |
|
85 |
39 |
43.9 |
41.1 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.) |
1035 |
1950 |
$ 1950 per month spousal support, $ 1035 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 39 K income and is imputed to 85 K |
|
86 |
86 |
26.4 |
59.6 |
21.1 |
22.0 |
38.5 |
16.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support retroactive, 1.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 86 K per year |
|
96 |
96 |
24.6 |
71.4 |
23.2 |
4.5 |
48.2 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.) |
752 |
1300 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support and $ 752 child support, 4.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 96 K per year |
|
98 |
98 |
24.1 |
73.9 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
48.0 |
48.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Cianciotta v. Cianciotta, 2007 CanLII 24076 (ON S.C.) |
779 |
1232 |
$ 779 child support and $ 1232 per month spousal support, mans income 98 K |
|
100 |
0.0 |
45.6 |
54.4 |
21.0 |
36.0 |
33.4 |
(2.6) |
|
|
b |
y |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) |
1600 |
2200 |
3.8 K combined support plus 1 K per month arrears, spousal support 2.2 K per month, s.7 expenses and retroactive lump sums, man is assignee in bankruptcy, mans income imputed to 100 K |
|
100 |
100 |
32.4 |
67.6 |
25.5 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Logiacco v. Papadopoulos, 2005 CanLII 5473 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 K child support per month, man makes 100 K per year |
|
102 |
55 |
47.5 |
54.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
25.3 |
25.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.) |
2460 |
1500 |
$ 1960 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expense and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 55 K income and is imputed to 102 K |
|
105 |
105 |
32.4 |
72.6 |
35.0 |
(22.5) |
37.6 |
60.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Raaymakers v. Green, 2006 CanLII 719 (ON C.A.) |
1500 |
1200 |
1.2 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K childs support, trial costs against wife reduced to 11.5 K from 57 K and 10 K costs of appeal, man makes 105 K per year |
|
120 |
120 |
28.2 |
91.8 |
39.9 |
5.7 |
51.9 |
46.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Minty v. Minty, 2003 CanLII 2185 (ON S.C.) |
724 |
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support and $ 724 per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive s.7 expenses |
|
132 |
55 |
67.2 |
64.8 |
35.3 |
0.0 |
29.5 |
29.5 |
|
|
b |
y |
Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
2200 |
3400 |
3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year |
|
132 |
132 |
48.0 |
84.0 |
45.1 |
32.0 |
38.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
S.L. v. A.L., 2003 CanLII 2161 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
1500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, 132 K imputed income, 32 K arrears |
|
150 |
150 |
69.6 |
80.4 |
47.2 |
15.5 |
33.2 |
17.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
3000 |
2600 |
3 K per month child support and 2.6 K per month spousal support and $ 200 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 150 K, 40 K interim disbursement, 15.5 K costs |
|
171 |
171 |
69.6 |
101.4 |
46.5 |
0.0 |
59.4 |
59.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
4500 |
4.5 K spousal support per month, 1.3 K child support per month for 1 child, man earns 171 K per year |
|
175 |
175 |
57.6 |
117.4 |
67.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.) |
3100 |
1700 |
1.7 K spousal support per month, 3.1 K child support |
|
179 |
179 |
51.6 |
127.4 |
61.7 |
22.0 |
65.7 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Schmidt v. Haley, 2004 CanLII 34344 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support and 1.3 K child support, retroactive arrears, man makes 179 K per year |
|
180 |
180 |
95.7 |
84.3 |
52.0 |
0.0 |
32.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lewi v. Lewi, 2005 CanLII 4441 (ON S.C.) |
2750 |
4188 |
50 K per year spousal support, 33 K per year child support, s.7 expenses, 2 children in university, mans income is 180 K per year |
|
190 |
190 |
76.0 |
114.0 |
58.5 |
0.0 |
55.5 |
55.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Da Silva v. Da Silva, 2004 CanLII 8940 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
4500 |
Interim spousal support of 4.5 K per month, child support 1.5 K, 71.5 % of s.7 expenses, man makes 190 K per year |
|
200 |
28 |
93.3 |
106.7 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Mashadi (Bankruptcy), Re, 2004 CanLII 15923 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
$ 7771 per month child and spousal support, man claims income of 28 K and is imputed to 200 K per year, judge says he runs a cash business |
|
204 |
165 |
54.0 |
150.0 |
78.9 |
0.0 |
71.0 |
71.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Tymoszewicz (Re), 2007 CanLII 39765 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim child support and 2 K per month temporary spousal support based on an imputed income of 204 K, man claims income of 165 K |
|
219 |
219 |
138.0 |
81.0 |
66.8 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Watson v. Watson, 2004 CanLII 19612 (ON S.C.) |
6100 |
5400 |
5.4 K spousal support per month, 6.1 K child support per month including s.7 expenses of $ 3832 per month, man makes 219 K per year |
|
227 |
140 |
79.2 |
147.8 |
72.9 |
90.0 |
74.9 |
(15.1) |
|
|
b |
s |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.) |
1600 |
5000 |
5 K spousal support per month retroactive for 18 months, 1.6 K child support per month, mans declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K |
|
250 |
52 |
99.6 |
150.4 |
75.2 |
20.0 |
75.2 |
55.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 14151 (ON S.C.) |
1800 |
6500 |
20 K lump sum and 6.5 K per month spousal support, 1.8 K per month child support, man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 250 K per year |
|
376 |
376 |
57.6 |
318.4 |
154.3 |
42.0 |
164.1 |
122.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2004 CanLII 36110 (ON C.A.) |
2000 |
2800 |
2.8 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support, 42 K arrears, man makes 376 K income per year |
|
400 |
243 |
165.3 |
234.7 |
139.2 |
0.0 |
95.5 |
95.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Wells v. Wells, 2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.) |
6275 |
7500 |
7.5 K spousal support per month, 5.6 K child support per month and maximum 675 per month s.7 expense, man claims 243 K income and wife asks he be imputed to 600 K but court imputes to 400 K |
|
530 |
150 |
195.6 |
334.4 |
191.2 |
113.0 |
143.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
7300 |
9000 |
9 K per month spousal support., 7.3 K per month child support, man claims income of 150 K and is imputed to 530 K, 113 K arrears |
|
561 |
561 |
108.0 |
453.0 |
227.9 |
7.0 |
225.1 |
218.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Loy v. Loy, 2005 CanLII 27606 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
5000 |
7 K per month spousal support, 2 K per month child support, 1 year retroactive |
|
890 |
890 |
134.1 |
755.9 |
349.9 |
57.0 |
405.1 |
348.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.) |
5800 |
10500 |
10.5 K per month spousal support, 5.8 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man makes 890 K per year, 35 K costs |
|
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
|
20 |
6.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
|
9 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
|
10 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
|
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
|
13 |
4 |
2.4 |
11.6 |
0.6 |
6.0 |
11.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
|
15 |
2 |
3.5 |
11.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
|
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
|
16 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
14.5 |
1.3 |
4.6 |
13.2 |
8.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
|
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
13.3 |
1.3 |
14.4 |
12.0 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
|
17 |
5 |
1.6 |
15.4 |
1.5 |
9.7 |
13.9 |
4.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
|
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
|
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
|
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
16.3 |
1.7 |
21.0 |
14.6 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
|
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
|
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
|
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
|
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
|
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
15.4 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
|
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
16.3 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
|
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
|
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
2.3 |
5.7 |
14.7 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
|
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
19.6 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
17.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
5.7 |
17.2 |
11.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
|
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
19.2 |
2.9 |
12.0 |
16.3 |
4.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
|
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
|
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
|
25 |
12 |
5.7 |
19.3 |
3.2 |
43.6 |
16.1 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
|
25 |
25 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
|
26 |
13 |
2.6 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
|
26 |
15 |
6.0 |
20.0 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
16.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26 |
22 |
4.5 |
21.5 |
3.4 |
14.1 |
18.1 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
|
27 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
22.6 |
3.6 |
22.0 |
19.0 |
(3.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
|
27 |
13 |
6.5 |
20.5 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
|
27 |
27 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
|
28 |
12 |
1.2 |
26.8 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
23.0 |
23.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
|
29 |
29 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
|
29 |
29 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
25.2 |
4.2 |
13.8 |
21.0 |
7.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
|
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
24 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
|
30 |
30 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
|
30 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
|
33 |
33 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
|
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
|
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
|
34 |
20 |
3.6 |
30.4 |
5.1 |
12.0 |
25.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
|
34 |
34 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
29.5 |
5.3 |
5.7 |
24.2 |
18.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
31.3 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
29.6 |
5.3 |
17.0 |
24.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
|
35 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
31.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
|
35 |
18 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
30.0 |
23.7 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
|
35 |
18 |
8.2 |
26.8 |
5.3 |
36.0 |
21.5 |
(14.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
|
35 |
35 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
|
36 |
36 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
|
36 |
36 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
|
36 |
36 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
|
37 |
37 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
|
37 |
37 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
|
38 |
38 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
|
38 |
38 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
|
39 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
|
39 |
24 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
|
39 |
39 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
|
39 |
39 |
7.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) |
591 |
|
$ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears |
|
40 |
10 |
6.8 |
33.2 |
6.3 |
13.0 |
26.9 |
13.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
|
40 |
12 |
7.2 |
32.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
26.5 |
26.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
26 |
7.0 |
33.0 |
6.3 |
4.8 |
27.0 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
4.1 |
35.9 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party |
|
40 |
40 |
12.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
21.4 |
21.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) |
1021 |
|
$ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
10.2 |
29.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K |
|
41 |
27 |
7.8 |
33.2 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.6 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K |
|
41 |
41 |
7.0 |
34.0 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.5 |
27.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) |
583 |
|
$ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year |
|
41.6 |
22.3 |
4.5 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII)
|
359 |
|
$ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year |
|
43 |
|
6.0 |
33.0 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.1 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
371 |
|
$ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K |
|
43 |
12 |
9.6 |
33.4 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.5 |
14.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K |
|
43 |
14 |
8.6 |
34.4 |
6.9 |
5.5 |
27.5 |
22.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) |
714 |
|
$ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare |
|
43 |
43 |
7.8 |
35.2 |
6.9 |
14.5 |
28.3 |
13.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K |
|
43.8 |
43.8 |
4 |
29.5 |
7.1 |
2.2 |
22.4 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears |
|
44 |
44 |
5.1 |
38.9 |
7.2 |
8.5 |
31.7 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) |
423 |
|
$ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award |
|
44 |
26 |
17.8 |
26.2 |
7.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII)
|
1484 |
|
$ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K |
|
45 |
26 |
9.1 |
37.4 |
7.4 |
10.1 |
30.0 |
19.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
635 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year |
|
45 |
45 |
4.8 |
40.2 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
32.8 |
32.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) |
387 |
|
$ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K |
|
47 |
12 |
8.0 |
39.0 |
8.9 |
24.0 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
669 |
|
$ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
47 |
47 |
8.5 |
38.5 |
8.9 |
32.0 |
29.6 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) |
710 |
|
$ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents |
|
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
35.3 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
47 |
47 |
10.4 |
36.6 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
|
$ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year |
|
47.1 |
47.1 |
8.0 |
39.1 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
30.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K |
|
48 |
36 |
5.4 |
42.6 |
11.8 |
3.2 |
30.8 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears |
|
49 |
49 |
12.9 |
35.1 |
12.1 |
19.0 |
23.0 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
1074 |
|
$ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K |
|
49.1 |
49.1 |
10.8 |
38.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) |
901 |
|
$ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K |
|
50 |
10 |
9.0 |
41.0 |
12.5 |
35.0 |
28.5 |
(6.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K |
|
50 |
35 |
10.1 |
39.9 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
x |
|
$ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed |
|
50 |
50 |
5.7 |
44.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) |
475 |
|
$ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
35.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
35.6 |
12.5 |
40.0 |
23.1 |
(16.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
|
50 |
10 |
13.8 |
36.2 |
12.5 |
4.7 |
23.7 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
1152 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
|
51 |
51 |
8.2 |
42.8 |
12.8 |
12.0 |
30.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII |
560 |
|
$ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year |
|
52 |
52 |
5.2 |
46.8 |
13.1 |
12.0 |
33.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) |
430 |
|
$ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year |
|
52 |
52 |
10.9 |
41.1 |
13.1 |
6.3 |
28.5 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) |
783 |
|
$ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year |
|
52.5 |
52.5 |
5.7 |
46.8 |
13.2 |
27.2 |
33.6 |
6.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) |
477 |
|
$ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K |
|
53 |
23 |
8.9 |
44.1 |
13.4 |
22.8 |
30.7 |
7.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
739 |
|
$ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K |
|
53 |
53 |
5.4 |
47.6 |
13.4 |
5.7 |
34.2 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
450 |
|
$ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year |
|
53 |
53 |
6.0 |
47.0 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.6 |
33.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K |
|
54 |
26.4 |
10.5 |
43.5 |
13.7 |
15.7 |
29.8 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII)
|
750 |
|
$ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs |
|
54 |
30 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) |
980 |
|
$ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K |
|
54 |
54 |
11.7 |
42.3 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII)
|
852 |
|
$ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K |
|
55 |
36 |
10.7 |
43.3 |
14.0 |
1.0 |
29.3 |
28.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
768 |
|
$ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K |
|
55 |
55 |
5.9 |
49.1 |
14.0 |
19.0 |
35.1 |
16.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) |
495 |
|
$ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year |
|
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
46.7 |
14.4 |
2.0 |
32.3 |
30.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
|
56 |
56 |
9.4 |
46.6 |
14.4 |
27.0 |
32.2 |
5.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII)
|
780 |
|
$ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award |
|
56 |
56 |
17.6 |
38.4 |
14.4 |
6.0 |
24.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
1463 |
|
$ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs |
|
57 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
51.2 |
14.6 |
5.7 |
36.6 |
30.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
|
58 |
9 |
4.8 |
53.2 |
15.0 |
48.0 |
38.2 |
(9.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance |
|
58 |
58 |
2.4 |
55.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year |
|
58 |
58 |
20.3 |
37.7 |
15.0 |
9.0 |
23.7 |
14.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) |
1358 |
|
$ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears |
|
59 |
59 |
10.3 |
48.7 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) |
858 |
|
Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare |
|
59.4 |
59.4 |
11.2 |
48.2 |
15.5 |
5.1 |
32.7 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) |
935 |
|
$ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year |
|
60 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
50.4 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
24.3 |
38.3 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII)
|
507 |
|
$ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
6.7 |
53.3 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
39.7 |
39.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K |
|
60 |
60 |
7.6 |
52.4 |
15.6 |
45.7 |
36.8 |
(8.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income |
|
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
2.1 |
38.3 |
36.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year |
|
60.8 |
60.8 |
6.2 |
54.6 |
15.8 |
20.8 |
38.8 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) |
514 |
|
$ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K |
|
61 |
61 |
10.4 |
50.6 |
15.9 |
4.5 |
34.7 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) |
863 |
|
$ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears |
|
62.9 |
62.9 |
16.0 |
44.9 |
16.5 |
1.4 |
28.4 |
27.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K |
|
63 |
63 |
17.4 |
45.6 |
16.5 |
71.0 |
29.1 |
(41.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) |
1120 |
|
$1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year |
|
63.2 |
63.2 |
6.4 |
57.0 |
16.6 |
0.0 |
40.4 |
40.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) |
531 |
|
$ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K |
|
65 |
46 |
5.6 |
59.4 |
17.1 |
10.0 |
42.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime |
|
66 |
66 |
8.4 |
57.6 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
40.2 |
40.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) |
696 |
|
$ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
14.9 |
51.1 |
17.4 |
20.2 |
33.7 |
13.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) |
908 |
|
$ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year |
|
67 |
33 |
7.2 |
59.8 |
17.8 |
11.0 |
42.0 |
31.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) |
603 |
|
$ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K |
|
67 |
67 |
12.6 |
54.4 |
17.8 |
7.9 |
36.6 |
28.7 |
|
|
c |
y |
Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) |
1048 |
|
$ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K |
|
67.3 |
67.3 |
16.0 |
51.3 |
17.9 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) |
1330 |
|
$ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year |
|
68. |
68 |
13.5 |
54.5 |
18.1 |
0.0 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) |
1123 |
|
$ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year |
|
69 |
12 |
14.4 |
54.6 |
18.4 |
14.0 |
36.2 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed |
|
71.3 |
71.3 |
7.9 |
63.4 |
19.1 |
0.0 |
44.3 |
44.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) |
656 |
|
$ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K |
|
72 |
14.4 |
7.9 |
64.1 |
19.3 |
7.9 |
44.8 |
36.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) |
661 |
|
$ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income |
|
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
|
73 |
41 |
7.2 |
65.8 |
20.8 |
0.0 |
45.0 |
45.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) |
596 |
|
$ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K |
|
75 |
26 |
8.2 |
66.8 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
45.4 |
45.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) |
680 |
|
$ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K |
|
75 |
75 |
9.3 |
65.7 |
21.4 |
2.7 |
44.3 |
41.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII)
|
778 |
|
$ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs |
|
75 |
75 |
7.3 |
67.7 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
46.3 |
46.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) |
606 |
|
$ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year |
|
77 |
34 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
42.9 |
42.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K |
|
77 |
77 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
66.9 |
42.9 |
(24.0) |
|
|
c |
o |
Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K |
|
80 |
35 |
9.1 |
69.9 |
23.1 |
0.0 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
719 |
|
$ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
|
80.1 |
76.4 |
12.5 |
67.6 |
23.2 |
0.0 |
44.4 |
44.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K |
|
81 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
72.2 |
23.4 |
2.8 |
48.8 |
46.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
|
81 |
35 |
7.6 |
73.4 |
23.4 |
0.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
643 |
|
$ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K |
|
81.7 |
81.7 |
16.3 |
65.4 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
40.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) |
1360 |
|
$ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs |
|
83 |
83 |
16.7 |
66.3 |
25.8 |
8.2 |
40.2 |
32.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) |
1392 |
|
$1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year |
|
83.3 |
83.3 |
15.1 |
68.2 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) |
1261 |
|
$ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K |
|
85 |
85 |
26.0 |
59.0 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
|
$ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K |
|
88 |
30 |
14.7 |
73.3 |
33.9 |
40.0 |
39.4 |
(0.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
894 |
|
$ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears |
|
90 |
13 |
9.7 |
80.3 |
34.7 |
30.0 |
45.6 |
15.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.)
|
806 |
|
Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
|
90 |
90 |
18.5 |
71.5 |
34.7 |
9.7 |
36.8 |
27.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) |
1209 |
|
$ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K |
|
96 |
28 |
14.4 |
81.6 |
37.3 |
28.0 |
44.3 |
16.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears |
|
99 |
58 |
11.1 |
87.9 |
38.6 |
0.0 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
927 |
|
$927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K |
|
100 |
60 |
10.6 |
89.4 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) |
877 |
|
$ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
|
101 |
101 |
10.7 |
90.3 |
39.5 |
9.7 |
58.5 |
49.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
889 |
|
$ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year |
|
110 |
110 |
18.1 |
91.4 |
44.1 |
0.0 |
47.3 |
47.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) |
1506 |
|
$ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year |
|
132 |
132 |
21.4 |
110.8 |
56.6 |
70.0 |
54.2 |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) |
1783 |
|
$ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year |
|
139 |
61 |
25.2 |
113.8 |
59.7 |
0.0 |
54.1 |
54.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
|
$1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year |
|
250 |
250 |
12.0 |
238.0 |
111.4 |
0.0 |
126.6 |
126.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year |
|
2000 |
2000 |
181.2 |
1818.8 |
928.0 |
0.0 |
890.0 |
890.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) |
15100 |
|
15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year |
|
|
60 |
48.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
2000 |
2 K per month spousal support, 2 K per month child support, man claims income of 60 K and is imputed higher, wife is unemployed |
|
21.6 |
21.6 |
7.0 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.6 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Pickard v. Pickard, 2005 CanLII 23688 (ON S.C.) |
287 |
300 |
$ 187 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses and $ 300 per month spousal support, lump sum of 5 K child support already paid, mans income 21.6 K, wife is unemployed |
|
45 |
45 |
39.2 |
5.8 |
4.1 |
13.0 |
1.7 |
(11.3) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
1968 |
1300 |
1.3 K per month spousal support and $ 635 per month child support and 16 K per year s.7 expense, 10 months retroactive arrears of spousal support, man makes reduced 45 K and wife is unemployed and will be imputed to imputed to 20 K in 3 months and spousal support cut to 1 K per month |
|
56 |
30 |
10.7 |
45.3 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
31.9 |
31.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
Dacres v. Dacres, 2007 ONCJ 622 (CanLII)
|
769 |
250 |
$ 250 spousal support per month and $ 519 in child support and 65 % of s.7 expenses, man claims 30 K income and is imputed to 56 K, wife is unemployed |
|
64 |
57 |
18.9 |
45.1 |
14.2 |
0.0 |
30.9 |
30.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Patkau v. Patkau, 2005 CanLII 49673 (ON S.C.) |
868 |
700 |
$ 868 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support, man claims an income of 57 K and is held to payments at 64 K, wife is unemployed |
|
65 |
65 |
18.5 |
46.5 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 543 child support, man earns 65 K per year and wife is a student |
|
66 |
46 |
30.6 |
35.4 |
12.6 |
0.0 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) |
1320 |
1230 |
1.23 K spousal support per month, 1.32 K child support per month including daycare, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 66 K per year |
|
67 |
67 |
30.0 |
37.0 |
6.9 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Shantz v. Shantz, 2003 CanLII 2416 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, 0.5 K per month child support, man makes 67 K per year and wife has no income |
|
75 |
75 |
30.0 |
45.0 |
16.5 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
28.5 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Kreklewich v. Kreklewich, 2003 CanLII 1963 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
1000 |
1 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K child support per month for 4 children, variation denied, man earns 75 K per year |
|
77 |
0.0 |
30.0 |
47.0 |
15.3 |
3.5 |
31.7 |
28.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1 K child support per month, 3.5 K retroactive arrears, man is unemployed, variation denied, income imputed to 77 K per year, wife is student. |
|
77 |
28 |
46.8 |
30.2 |
6.8 |
0.0 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
2900 |
$ 2900 per month spousal support, 1 K per year child support, man claims 28 K and income imputed to 77 K, variation denied |
|
77.5 |
77.5 |
22.8 |
54.7 |
17.6 |
35.0 |
37.1 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
Schisler v. Schisler, 2004 ONCJ 324 (CanLII) |
1000 |
900 |
1K per month child support and $ 900 per month spousal support, retroactive child support going back almost 3 years but no retroactive spousal support, man makes 77.5 K and wife claims no income |
|
81 |
28 |
24.1 |
56.9 |
15.9 |
90.0 |
41.0 |
(49.0) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Skramrud v. Skramrud, 2007 CanLII 51173 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal per month, $ 400 child support, lump sum of 90 K, man is imputed to former 81 K pay from actual 28 K for taking voluntary retirement, wife has no income |
|
83 |
70 |
34.6 |
48.4 |
17.7 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Stoyshin v. Stoyshin, 2007 CanLII 15478 (ON S.C.) |
1530 |
1350 |
$ 1350 per month spouasal support and $ 1250 per month child support and $ 280 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 83 K, wife is a student |
|
84 |
20 |
21.9 |
62.1 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)
|
1078 |
750 |
$ 1078 total child support per month and $ 750 spousal support, man claims 20 K income imputed to 84 K per year, wife has no income |
|
88 |
83 |
26.3 |
56.7 |
19.8 |
12.0 |
36.9 |
24.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Nanan v. Nanan, 2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
1500 |
$ 691 per month child support and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man pays 2 K per month mortgage for home wife occupies, income imputed from claimed 83 K to 88 K, wife has no income |
|
97 |
97 |
39.6 |
57.4 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Gentle v. Gentle, 2007 CanLII 17028 (ON S.C.) |
2131 |
1171 |
$ 2131 per month child support for 4 children based on an income of 97 K, $ 1171 per month spousal support |
|
250 |
72 |
72.3 |
178.0 |
|
20.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 250 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs |
|
100 |
100 |
44.4 |
55.6 |
17.2 |
33.0 |
38.4 |
5.4 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
2900 |
2.9 K per month indefinite spousal support, 0.8 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man does not submit financial documents and is imputed to 100 K per year income, 11K costs |
|
110 |
46 |
42.0 |
68.0 |
33.0 |
22.0 |
35.0 |
13.0 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Rae v. Rae, 2006 CanLII 33674 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 110 K per year, wife is unemployed |
|
110 |
75 |
54.0 |
56.0 |
25.3 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
3200 |
3.2 K spousal support per month, 1.3 K child support per month, man claims 75 K income and is imputed to 110, wife is unemployed |
|
125 |
125 |
48.0 |
77.0 |
36.9 |
0.0 |
40.1 |
40.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Chrobok v. Chrobok, 2006 CanLII 27308 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
2500 |
1.5 K per month child support and 2.5 K per month spousal support, mans income 125 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
129 |
129 |
36.5 |
92.5 |
43.8 |
0.0 |
48.7 |
48.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
K.J.B. v. S.M., 2006 ONCJ 87 (CanLII) |
1544 |
1500 |
$ 1544 per month child support and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man has 129 K income and wife is unemployed |
|
144 |
144 |
61.2 |
82.8 |
41.6 |
22.0 |
41.2 |
19.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.) |
2250 |
2850 |
5.1 K combined interim child and spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income at least 144 K and wife is unemployed |
|
194 |
194 |
88.0 |
106.0 |
51.8 |
0.0 |
54.2 |
54.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 1942 (ON S.C.) |
1700 |
5300 |
5.3 K per month spousal support and 1.7 child support per month and s.7 expenses, fathers gross income 194 K and salary 125 K per year |
|
200 |
100 |
120.0 |
80.0 |
|
40.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
10 K per month combined child and spousal support, man claims 100 K and is imputed to 200 K, wife is unemployed, 40 K costs |
|
221 |
221 |
67.2 |
153.8 |
92.4 |
0.0 |
61.0 |
61.0 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Celotti v. Celotti, 2007 CanLII 23909 (ON S.C.) |
4600 |
1000 |
$ 3.6 K per month child support, and 1 K per month s.7 expenses and 2 K per month spousal support, man makes 221 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
300 |
300 |
87.6 |
212.4 |
61.7 |
0.0 |
210.7 |
210.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Liao v. Liao, 2003 CanLII 2167 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
6500 |
6.5 K per month spousal support, 0.8 K per month child support, mans income is 300 K wife is unemployed |
|
355 |
62 |
69.6 |
285.4 |
149.0 |
140.0 |
136.4 |
(4.0) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
3800 |
2000 |
2 K per month spousal support, 3.8 K per month child support, 140 K arrears, mans income changes from 355 to 62 K per year but he must continue paying at 355 income level, only 1000 per month to be enforced until trial but he must pay arrears to participate at trial. |
|
388 |
388 |
138.0 |
250.0 |
139.2 |
0.0 |
110.8 |
110.8 |
0.0 |
|
b |
y |
Adams v. Adams, 2001 CanLII 8527 (ON C.A.)
|
5000 |
6500 |
5 K per month spousal support, 6.5 K child support per month, man earns average 388 K per year |
|
500 |
500 |
180.0 |
320.0 |
182.9 |
0.0 |
137.1 |
137.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Sharf v. Sharf, 2004 CanLII 5765 (ON S.C.) |
7000 |
8000 |
8 K spousal support, 7 K child support per month, man imputed to 500 K per year income wife has no income |
|
700 |
700 |
282.0 |
418.0 |
231.1 |
559.0 |
186.9 |
(372.1) |
0.0 |
|
b |
y |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
7500 |
16000 |
16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 35 K costs, man makes around 700 K and wife is unemployed |
|
76 |
76 |
24.5 |
51.5 |
21.8 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) |
1922 |
|
$ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her |
|
114 |
114 |
39.6 |
74.4 |
45.1 |
79.0 |
29.3 |
(49.7) |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
250 |
64 |
48.9 |
201.1 |
111.4 |
22.0 |
89.7 |
67.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) |
3400 |
|
3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K |
|
502 |
502 |
180.0 |
322.0 |
228.3 |
12.0 |
93.7 |
81.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) |
15000 |
|
15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed |
|
811 |
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared |
|
281 |
281 |
92.4 |
188.6 |
97.9 |
23.0 |
90.7 |
67.7 |
0.5 |
|
b |
s |
Le Bel v. Chartrand, 2007 CanLII 50876 (ON S.C.) |
2700 |
5000 |
5 K per month interim spousal support, 2.7 K per month child support, man also pays 23 K university expenses for older child not included in order, man earns 281 K and wife made $ 500 as an artist |
|
95 |
95 |
45.3 |
49.7 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
23.9 |
23.9 |
1.0 |
|
b |
s |
Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, 2.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 95 K and wife makes 1 K per year |
|
54 |
54 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
28.5 |
24.5 |
2.7 |
|
c |
s |
MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
982 |
|
$ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears |
|
41.9 |
41.9 |
15.5 |
25.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
18.7 |
18.7 |
3.3 |
|
c |
s |
Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) |
960 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
1.2 |
19.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
4.8 |
|
c |
o |
D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII)
|
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. |
|
44 |
44 |
19.2 |
24.8 |
2.3 |
22.9 |
22.5 |
(0.4) |
6.5 |
|
b |
s |
Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
499 |
1100 |
$ 1100 per month spousal support with 12 K retroactive lump, $ 374 per month child support and 125 per month s.7 expense, 10.9 K retroactive arrears, proceeds from sale of home to be held as security, hasn’t seen child in 1 ½ years, permanent restraining order, man makes 44 K and wife on social assistance |
|
49 |
49 |
23.7 |
25.3 |
4.7 |
1.6 |
19.6 |
18.0 |
6.5 |
|
b |
s |
V. W. v. Wa. T., 2005 CanLII 2752 (ON S.C.)
|
575 |
1400 |
$ 1400 spousal support per month and $ 420 child support and $ 155 s.7 expenses, arrears 1.6 K, man makes 49 K and wife is on social assistance |
|
110 |
60 |
58.2 |
51.8 |
16.2 |
0.0 |
35.6 |
35.6 |
6.5 |
|
b |
o |
Downer v. Alexander, 2005 ONCJ 245 (CanLII) |
850 |
4000 |
4 K spousal support per month, 0.8 K child support per month, man claims income of 60 K and is imputed to 110 K per year, wife is on social assistance |
|
50 |
10 |
22.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
59.0 |
21.7 |
37.3 |
7 |
|
b |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
1150 |
$ 750 child support and $ 1150 spousal support with 59 K arrears, arrears and spousal support rescinded to lump sum spousal support of 35 K if he can pay it, man claims 10 K income but must pay at former 50 K imuted level, wife earns 7 K per year |
|
84 |
84 |
35.0 |
49.0 |
19.3 |
17.0 |
29.7 |
12.7 |
7 |
|
b |
s |
Marsbergen v. Marsbergen, 2006 CanLII 3969 (ON S.C.) |
1916 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, 1.4 K per month child support and maximum 6.2 K annual s.7 expense not including dental work , retroactive, arrears 17 K, man earns 64 K and wife eans 7 K per year |
|
84 |
75 |
12.5 |
71.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
7.3 |
|
c |
s |
Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy |
|
20 |
20 |
15.6 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
7.5 |
|
b |
y |
Arvai v. Arvai, 2001 CanLII 24142 (ON C.A.) |
296 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support and $ 296 per month child support, upheld on appeal, man makes 20 K and wife makes 7.5 K per year |
|
56 |
56 |
14.9 |
41.1 |
11.6 |
2.5 |
29.5 |
27.0 |
7.5 |
|
b |
s |
Martin v. Blanchard, 2007 CanLII 26612 (ON S.C.) |
519 |
723 |
$ 519 child support per month and 2.5 K retroactive arrears and $ 723 per month spousal support, mans income 56 K and wifes income 7.5 K per year |
|
65 |
65 |
29.2 |
35.8 |
13.4 |
9.7 |
22.4 |
12.7 |
7.5 |
|
b |
s |
Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support retroactive, 1.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, previous lump sum payment, mans income variable set at 65 K and wifes income 7.5 K per year |
|
27.9 |
27.9 |
5.4 |
22.5 |
3.3 |
5.8 |
19.2 |
13.4 |
8 |
|
b |
s |
Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2129 (ON S.C.) |
248 |
200 |
$ 248 child support and $ 200 spousal support per month, 5.8 K arrears, mans income imputed to 27.9 K and wife claims 8 K |
|
120 |
31 |
30.4 |
89.6 |
43.5 |
225.0 |
46.1 |
(178.9) |
8 |
|
b |
s |
Trick v. Trick, 2003 CanLII 2260 (ON S.C.) |
1400 |
800 |
Average $ 800 spousal support and 1.4 K child support, 75 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears of 225 K, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 120 K per year, wife makes 8 K |
|
31.2 |
31.2 |
3.4 |
27.8 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
23.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
|
c |
o |
Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. |
281 |
|
$ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year |
|
82.4 |
82.4 |
21.4 |
61.0 |
17.3 |
18.5 |
43.7 |
25.2 |
8.9 |
|
b |
s |
Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.) |
380 |
1400 |
$380 child support and $ 1200 spousal support increased to $ 1400, 18.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 82.4 K and wifes income 8.9 K per year |
|
225 |
170 |
72.0 |
153.0 |
92.3 |
22.0 |
60.7 |
38.7 |
8.9 |
|
b |
s |
Salzmann v. Salzmann, 2004 CanLII 5009 (ON S.C.) |
2400 |
3600 |
3.6 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support per month and $ 400 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 170 K per year income and is imputed to 225 K, wife has 8.9 K interest income |
|
100 |
100 |
32.5 |
71.5 |
25.5 |
9.7 |
46.0 |
36.3 |
9.6 |
|
b |
s |
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 2006 CanLII 24337 (ON S.C.) |
878 |
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal suport and $ 878 per month child support increased from $ 700 retroactively, man makes 100 K per year and wife makes 9.6 K before support |
|
40 |
40 |
8.9 |
31.1 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.8 |
25.8 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Jarzebinski v. Jarzebinski, 2004 CanLII 36075 (ON S.C.) |
345 |
400 |
$ 400 spousal support and $ 345 child support per month, man earns 40 K per year wife earns 10 K |
|
45 |
8 |
16.6 |
28.4 |
4.8 |
30.0 |
23.6 |
(6.4) |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.) |
387 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 387 child support, 30 K spousal support lump sum payment too, 10 K equalization, man claims 8 K income and is imputed to 45 K, wife has income of 10 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
17.4 |
48.6 |
14.1 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Erb v. Erb, 2003 CanLII 2112 (ON S.C.) |
548 |
900 |
$ 548 child support and $ 900 spousal support, mans income 66 K and wifes income 10 K per year |
|
75 |
75 |
19.4 |
55.6 |
17.8 |
0.0 |
37.8 |
37.8 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
C.J.A. v. L.R.G., 2004 CanLII 18593 (ON S.C.) |
979 |
640 |
$ 979 child support and $ 640 spousal support, spousal support limited to one final year and gradually reduced, mans income 75 K and wifes income 10 K per year |
|
151 |
151 |
72.0 |
79.0 |
37.8 |
15.0 |
41.2 |
26.2 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
4500 |
4.5 K per month spousal support, 1.5 K child support per month, 15 K retroactive arrears, man makes 151 K per year wife makes 10 K |
|
177 |
177 |
68.8 |
108.2 |
42.5 |
23.0 |
65.7 |
42.7 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Cade v. Rotstein, 2002 CanLII 2811 (ON S.C.) |
1800 |
3600 |
3.6 spousal support per month, 1.8 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 23 K retroactive arrears, 177 K imputed to husband and 10 K imputed to wife |
|
332 |
208 |
108.0 |
224.0 |
118.8 |
0.0 |
105.2 |
105.2 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.) |
3500 |
5500 |
5.5 K spousal support, 3.5 K child support per month, mans declared income of 208 K imputed to 332 K, wifes income 10 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
20.4 |
8.4 |
10 |
|
c |
s |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year |
|
38 |
38 |
5.0 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
3.2 |
27.1 |
23.9 |
10 |
|
c |
o |
Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) |
415 |
|
$ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K |
|
60 |
60 |
15.0 |
45.0 |
12.8 |
0.0 |
32.2 |
32.2 |
10.2 |
|
b |
s |
Toth v. Toth, 2003 CanLII 2259 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
750 |
$ 500 child support and $ 750 interim spousal support, retroactivity reserved for trial judge, man earns 60 K and wife earns 10.2 K per year |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
5.6 |
13.1 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11 |
|
c |
o |
Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) |
463 |
|
$ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K |
|
55 |
55 |
19.9 |
35.1 |
7.2 |
7.7 |
27.9 |
20.2 |
12 |
|
b |
s |
Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) |
762 |
900 |
$ 900 spousal support and $ 762 child support, 7.7 K arrears, husband makes 55 K per year wife makes 12 K, both imputed |
|
71 |
71 |
18.9 |
52.1 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
12 |
|
b |
s |
Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 CanLII 2646 (ON S.C.) |
578 |
1000 |
1 K spousal support, $ 578 child support , man makes 71 K per year and wife makes 12 K |
|
81 |
81 |
27.1 |
57.9 |
19.3 |
12.8 |
38.6 |
25.8 |
12 |
|
b |
s |
Austin v. Austin, 2007 CanLII 46719 (ON S.C.) |
1177 |
750 |
$ 1177 child support per month and $ 750 spousal support per month, s.7 expenses, 13.9 K retroactive support arrears and 2.9 K retroactive s.7 arrears, wife earns 12 K per year and husband earns 81 K |
|
40 |
40 |
7.7 |
32.3 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
26.0 |
14.0 |
12 |
|
c |
s |
Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) |
645 |
|
$ 345 per month in child support and $ 300 in s.7 expenses, arrears, restraining order, mans income 40 K wifes 12 K |
|
45.4 |
45.4 |
7.7 |
37.7 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
30.2 |
28.0 |
12 |
|
c |
o |
Kocko v. Kocko, 2004 CanLII 12571 (ON C.J.) |
641 |
|
$ 391 per month child support changed from temporary order of $ 920 per month, $ 250 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 45.4 K, wifes income 12 K per year, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 expense |
|
50 |
50 |
8.4 |
41.6 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
29.1 |
29.1 |
12 |
|
c |
s |
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 21793 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 300 per month contribution to RESP and pays mortgage and insurance, man makes 50 K and wife makes 12 K per year |
|
50 |
50 |
19.8 |
30.2 |
7.4 |
9.7 |
22.8 |
13.1 |
12.8 |
|
b |
s |
Royston v. Royston, 2003 CanLII 1978 (ON S.C.) |
1253 |
400 |
$ 1253 per month total child support and $ 400 per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, man makes 60 K per year and wife makes 12.8 K per year |
|
54 |
54 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
b |
s |
Mwangi v. Wahome, 2004 CanLII 48888 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support and guideline amount for 3 children at 54 K income, man also pays $ 240 car loan and $ 150 insurance of wifes costs, wife make 12.8 K and husband makes 54 K per year |
|
42 |
42 |
4.6 |
37.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
13 |
|
c |
o |
Buckner v. Card, 2007 ONCJ 51 (CanLII)
|
386 |
|
$ 386 per month child support, wife and child live in Alberta, man has 42 K income wife makes 13 K per year |
|
40 |
0.0 |
9.2 |
30.8 |
5.8 |
0.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
13.8 |
|
b |
s |
M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
200 |
$ 570 child support and $ 200 spousal support, father doesn’t see children, man on unemployment is imputed to 40 K per year, wifes income is 13.8 K per year |
|
51 |
51 |
19.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
25.8 |
25.8 |
14 |
|
b |
s |
Biehn v. Biehn, 2003 CanLII 2062 (ON S.C.) |
442 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 442 child support and $ 150 s.7 expense, mans income 51 K and wifes income 14 K per year |
|
79.6 |
79.6 |
21.7 |
57.9 |
18.3 |
0.8 |
39.6 |
38.8 |
14.4 |
|
b |
s |
Johnston v. Johnston, 2007 CanLII 40214 (ON S.C.) |
912 |
900 |
$ 912 per month child support and $ 900 spousal support, $ 793 s.7 expense lump sum, man makes 79.6 K and wife makes 14.4 K per year |
|
21.6 |
21.6 |
9.7 |
11.9 |
1.2 |
0.0 |
10.7 |
10.7 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Buhr v. Buhr, 2004 CanLII 5033 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
500 |
$ 305 per month child support and $ 500 spousal support, man on unemployment at 21.6 K per year, wife makes 15 K per year |
|
49 |
49 |
13.9 |
35.1 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
15 |
|
b |
o |
Rufft v. MacCulloch, 2006 ONCJ 457 (CanLII) |
912 |
250 |
$ 462 per month child support and $ 450 plus per month s.7 expenses, $ 250 per month spousal support, interim ruling, man makes 49 K and wife makes 15 K per year |
|
60 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
39.9 |
12.7 |
44.0 |
27.7 |
(16.8) |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.) |
823 |
725 |
$ 725 spousal support per month, $ 823 child support per month and 43 % s.7 expenses, man unemployed, imputed to 100 K per year income, wife imputed from 10 K claimed to 15 K, further imputions for 2005 for both, 44 K arrears |
|
60 |
20 |
18.1 |
41.9 |
11.8 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 507 per month child support, income imputed to 60 K from claim of 20 K, wifes income 15 K per year |
|
140 |
118 |
60.4 |
79.6 |
45.1 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2247 (ON S.C.) |
1700 |
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support, 0.9 K per month child support, 0.8 K per month s.7 expenses, man claims 118 K and has an average 103 K income but is imputed to 140 K, wife makes 15 K per year |
|
150 |
0.0 |
62.4 |
87.6 |
47.8 |
36.0 |
39.8 |
3.8 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.) |
2700 |
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support and 1.8 K per month child support and s.7 expense 0.9 K per month, both are unemployed and 150 K is imputed to husband and 15 K imputed to wife, assets to be sold to pay arrears |
|
235 |
235 |
49.2 |
185.8 |
87.7 |
0.0 |
98.1 |
98.1 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Perdue v. Perdue, 2007 CanLII 37895 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support and 1.1 K per month child support, retroactivity to be determined at trial, man makes 235 K and wife makes 15 K per year |
|
270 |
270 |
64.0 |
206.0 |
98.4 |
0.0 |
107.6 |
107.6 |
15 |
|
b |
s |
Rybiak v. Rybiak, 2002 CanLII 2813 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
4000 |
Spousal support 4 K per month, child support 1 K per month and s.7 expenses for tuition, man makes 270 K per year and wife makes 15 K |
|
27.9 |
27.9 |
4.2 |
23.7 |
3.8 |
12.0 |
19.9 |
7.9 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) |
350 |
|
$ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K |
|
35.8 |
25 |
9.6 |
26.2 |
5.4 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) |
800 |
|
$ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K |
|
80 |
64.4 |
21.0 |
59.0 |
16.4 |
10.0 |
42.6 |
32.6 |
15.1 |
|
b |
s |
Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
1450 |
$ 1450 per month spousal support and $ 300 per month child support, 10 K retroactive lump sum arrears, man claims 64.4 K income and is imputed to 80 K, wifes income 15.1 K per year |
|
96 |
90 |
33.0 |
63.0 |
34.5 |
4.0 |
28.5 |
4.0 |
16 |
|
b |
s |
Mitton v. Mitton, 2006 CanLII 37599 (ON S.C.) |
1750 |
800 |
1.75 K child support per month, 800 spousal support per month, 4 K retroactive arrears, man claims 90 K income and is imputed to 96 K |
|
15.6 |
8.5 |
3.0 |
12.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.6 |
12.6 |
16 |
|
c |
o |
Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII)
|
248 |
|
$ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
|
51 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
42.4 |
12.8 |
11.5 |
29.6 |
18.1 |
16 |
|
c |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
|
$ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
|
25 |
18 |
7.5 |
17.5 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
15.4 |
15.4 |
16.3 |
|
b |
s |
Demetriou v. Demetriou, 2006 CanLII 16364 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
400 |
$ 222 child support and $ 400 spousal support, man claims income of 18 K and is imputed to 25 K and wife makes 16.3 K |
|
33.6 |
33.6 |
9.2 |
24.4 |
4.4 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
10.0 |
16.3 |
|
b |
s |
Smylie v. Smylie, 2006 CanLII 39471 (ON S.C.) |
563 |
200 |
$ 517 per month child support, $ 200 per month spousal support, $ 46 per month s.7 expenses, 10 K retroactive spousal and child support, mans income 33.6 K and wifes income 16.3 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
14.2 |
51.8 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
34.4 |
34.4 |
17 |
|
c |
s |
Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) |
1183 |
|
$ 844 child support per month and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wifes income 17 K per year before support |
|
48 |
48 |
13.5 |
34.5 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
27.8 |
27.8 |
17.1 |
|
b |
s |
Turner v. Turner, 2003 CanLII 2261 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
500 |
$ 500 spousal support and $ 500 child support, s.7 expenses, wifes income 17.1 K and mans income 48 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
22.6 |
37.4 |
11.8 |
0.0 |
25.6 |
25.6 |
18 |
|
b |
s |
Howard v. Alexander, 2004 CanLII 5795 (ON S.C.) |
883 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 883 child support, man makes 60 K wife makes 18 K per year |
|
105 |
105 |
15.0 |
89.0 |
41.2 |
0.0 |
47.8 |
47.8 |
18 |
|
c |
s |
Potyrala v. Potyrala, 2007 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) |
916 |
|
$ 916 per month interim child support, retroactivity to be decided at trial, 85 % s.7 expenses, mans income 105 K wifes income 18 K |
|
47 |
47 |
5.0 |
42.0 |
8.9 |
6.8 |
33.1 |
26.3 |
18.3 |
|
c |
s |
Paul v. Misselbrook, 2006 CanLII 13553 (ON S.C.) |
414 |
|
$ 414 per month child support, 6.8 K retroactive award, mans income 47 K and wife earns 18.3 K |
|
25 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
22.3 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
19.1 |
19.1 |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
|
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K |
|
46.5 |
46.5 |
5.4 |
41.1 |
8.8 |
19.0 |
32.3 |
13.3 |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Glomba v. Wray, 2003 CanLII 1960 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 400 child support and $ 66 daycare expense, mans income 46.5 K and wife earns 19 K, arrears |
|
79.2 |
79.2 |
26.4 |
52.8 |
17.0 |
18.2 |
35.8 |
17.6 |
19.5 |
|
b |
s |
Sobotka v. Sobotka, 2005 CanLII 3399 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
1200 |
1.2 K per month spousal support, 1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses including university tuition, 9.5 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 79.2 K wife makes 19.5 K per year |
|
45 |
45 |
24.7 |
20.3 |
4.1 |
16.9 |
16.2 |
(0.7) |
20 |
|
b |
s |
Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
635 |
1300 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support and $ 635 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 13 months retroactive spousal support man has income of 45 K, wifes average income over 20 K per year, husbands share of equalization held in trust as security |
|
70 |
70 |
16.4 |
53.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
38.6 |
38.6 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
Kereluk v. Kereluk, 2004 CanLII 34595 (ON S.C.) |
369 |
1000 |
$ 1000 interim spousal support and $ 369 child support, woman makes 20 K and man makes 70 K per year |
|
98 |
98 |
40.8 |
57.2 |
21.8 |
0.0 |
35.4 |
35.4 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
MacMillan v. MacMillan, 2002 CanLII 2685 (ON S.C.) |
1900 |
1500 |
1.5 K per month spousal support , 1.9 K per month child support including s.7 expenses, mans income 98 K and wifes income 20 K |
|
100 |
75 |
32.8 |
67.2 |
33.9 |
11.0 |
33.0 |
22.0 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
Delmas v. Delmas, 2007 CanLII 48650 (ON S.C.) |
1400 |
1000 |
1.4 K per month child support and 75 % s.7 expenses and 1 K per month spousal support, 11 K arrears, man claims 75 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 20 K per year |
|
125 |
65 |
48.0 |
77.0 |
36.9 |
0.0 |
40.1 |
40.1 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K child support per month, man claims 65 K income imputed to 125 K, wife also imputed, wife is unemployed and imputed to 20 K |
|
161 |
72 |
55.2 |
105.8 |
56.2 |
0.0 |
49.6 |
49.6 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
Dunning v. Dunning, 2006 CanLII 15898 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal support per month, 2.1 K child support per month, man claims 72 K income and is imputed to 161 K, wife earns 20 K per year |
|
178 |
178 |
41.2 |
136.8 |
69.6 |
0.0 |
67.2 |
67.2 |
20 |
|
b |
s |
Miller v. Shankman, 2004 CanLII 5063 (ON S.C.) |
1600 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1.6 K child support per month and 90 % s.7 expenses, man makes 178 K per year and wife is unemployed and 20 K is imputed to her |
|
100 |
82 |
9.3 |
90.7 |
39.1 |
7.0 |
51.6 |
44.6 |
20 |
|
c |
s |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
773 |
|
$773 child support and s.7 daycare expenses, $ 850 interim spousal support terminated, claim for unequal division rejected, man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife has 20 K income, 7 K costs |
|
44.9 |
44.9 |
8.1 |
36.8 |
7.0 |
0.0 |
29.8 |
8.1 |
20.4 |
|
b |
s |
Socan v. Socan, 2005 CanLII 33545 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
150 |
$ 150 per month spousal support and guideline child support for one child, s.7 expenses, mans income 44.9 K and wifes income 20.4 K per year |
|
81.5 |
81.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
b |
s |
Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.) |
|
750 |
$ 750 per month spousal support and unnamed child support for 3 children, man claims income of 81.5 K and wife claims 20.8 K per year |
|
120 |
115 |
6.0 |
114.0 |
47.8 |
0.0 |
66.2 |
66.2 |
21 |
|
c |
s |
Duggan v. Elson, 2007 CanLII 45910 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, man claims 115 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife has 21 K income per year |
|
89.3 |
89.3 |
32.0 |
57.3 |
20.6 |
0.0 |
36.7 |
36.7 |
21.3 |
|
b |
s |
Yetman v. Yetman, 2006 CanLII 7039 (ON S.C.)
|
1266 |
1400 |
1.1 K per month child supprt and $ 166 per month s.7 expense, 1.4 K per month spousal support, man makes 89.3 K and wife makes 21.3 K per year |
|
85 |
65 |
24.7 |
60.3 |
32.6 |
9.7 |
27.7 |
18.0 |
21.6 |
|
c |
s |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) |
1380 |
|
1.2 K child support and $ 180 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 65 K and is imputed to 85 K, wife has income of 21.6 K |
|
62 |
62 |
21.9 |
40.1 |
14.3 |
2.4 |
25.8 |
23.4 |
22.0 |
|
b |
s |
Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.) |
1325 |
500 |
$ 1325 child support and $ 500 spousal support, wife makes 22 K and husband makes 62 K per year, retroactive arrears as man only made 2.4 K in payments and order goes back 6 months |
|
103 |
103 |
43.2 |
59.8 |
38.3 |
10.0 |
21.5 |
10.5 |
22.0 |
|
b |
s |
R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C.) |
3200 |
400 |
0.4 K spousal support per month and 10 K lump sum, 1.7 K child support, 1.5 K s.7 expenses, mans income 103 K, wifes previous income 42 but imputed to 22 K |
|
56 |
40 |
9.3 |
46.7 |
14.3 |
0.0 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 child support, 2.9 K arrears expunged, man claims income of 40 K imputed to 56 K, wife earns 22 K per year |
|
59 |
59 |
9.6 |
39.4 |
15.3 |
8.0 |
24.1 |
16.1 |
22.0 |
|
c |
s |
Roy v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 18693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support to be reduced to $ 509, father must pay 8 K of university expenses, fathers income 59 K and mothers income 22 K |
|
44.3 |
44.3 |
15.7 |
28.6 |
4.7 |
19.0 |
23.9 |
4.9 |
22.8 |
|
b |
s |
J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 305 per month child support, arrears 9 K security deposit for support, man has income of 44.3 and woman has an income of 22.8 K per year |
|
54.4 |
54.4 |
14.0 |
40.4 |
8.7 |
0.8 |
31.7 |
30.9 |
23 |
|
b |
s |
Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2148 (ON S.C.) |
464 |
700 |
$ 700 per month spousal support and $ 464 per month child support, $800 arrears, wifes income 23 K before support and husbands 54.4 K per year |
|
46 |
34 |
5.4 |
40.6 |
8.7 |
4.0 |
27.9 |
23.9 |
23 |
|
c |
o |
McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) |
446 |
|
$ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs |
|
43.7 |
43.7 |
7.4 |
36.3 |
7.1 |
9.3 |
29.0 |
19.7 |
23.7 |
|
c |
s |
Ricketts v. Thomas, 2004 CanLII 12990 (ON S.C.) |
619 |
|
$ 619 per month child support, no order for spousal support, 9.3 retroactive arrears with some due to Ont Works, mans income 43.7 K and wifes is 23.7 K |
|
125 |
125 |
39.6 |
85.4 |
36.9 |
4.8 |
48.5 |
43.7 |
23.9 |
|
b |
s |
Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal support per month, $ 800 child support per month. 1.8 K retroactive arrears, 3 K costs, man earns 125 K and wife earns 23.9 K per year |
|
58 |
58 |
9.6 |
48.4 |
12.7 |
0.0 |
35.7 |
35.7 |
24 |
|
b |
s |
Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
600 |
$ 600 per month spousal support and $ 200 per month child support, husband earns 58 K income and wife 24 K, husband not childrens biological father |
|
86 |
86 |
16.5 |
69.5 |
22.7 |
2.0 |
46.3 |
44.3 |
24 |
|
b |
o |
Maua v. Maua, 2005 ONCJ 255 (CanLII) |
773 |
600 |
$ 773 per month child support and $ 600 spousal reduced from $ 1500, 2 K lump sum payment, man earns average 86 K wife earns 24 K per year, man also pays $ 500 per month from another marriage |
|
50.8 |
50.8 |
5.3 |
45.5 |
12.7 |
7.0 |
32.8 |
25.8 |
24 |
|
c |
s |
Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.)
|
438 |
|
$ 216 per month child support and $ 222 per month s.7 expense, 7 K retroactive arrears, mans income 50.8 K per year and wife has income of 24 K |
|
55 |
55 |
9.0 |
46.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
32.0 |
32.0 |
24 |
|
c |
s |
McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2006 CanLII 19439 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, man makes 55 K and wife makes 24 K per year |
|
64 |
64 |
10.8 |
53.2 |
16.8 |
190.0 |
36.4 |
(153.6) |
24 |
|
c |
s |
Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) |
900 |
|
$ 900 per month child support and 180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, 10 K costs, 180 K spousal support lump sum, man makes 64 K and wife makes 24 K |
|
200 |
134 |
19.7 |
180.3 |
88.2 |
26.8 |
92.1 |
65.3 |
24 |
|
c |
o |
A.(L.C.) v. A.(R.J.), 2003 CanLII 52484 (ON C.J.) |
1308 |
|
$ 1308 per month child support, 86 % s.7 expenses, arrears 26.8 K, father claims 134 K income and is imputed to 200 K, mother makes 24 K, |
|
73.8 |
73.8 |
24.1 |
49.9 |
17.3 |
0.0 |
32.6 |
32.6 |
24.1 |
|
b |
s |
Borden v. Racicot, 2003 CanLII 2066 (ON S.C.) |
972 |
700 |
$ 972 per month child support and $ 700 per month spousal support, s.7 expense, wife makes 24.1 K and husband makes 73.8 K per year |
|
31 |
12 |
8.2 |
22.8 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
19.4 |
19.4 |
24.4 |
|
b |
s |
Daemi v. Morovati, 2003 CanLII 2092 (ON S.C.) |
283 |
400 |
$ 400 per month spousal support and $ 283 child support, man claims income is 12 K but imputed at 31 K, bankruptcy, loses job when drivers license is removed, wifes income 24.4 K per year |
|
81 |
81 |
43.8 |
37.2 |
8.7 |
36.0 |
28.5 |
(7.5) |
24.4 |
|
b |
s |
Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.) |
1750 |
2900 |
2.9 K spousal support per month and 1.75 K child support per month based on an income of 81 K, wife earns 24.4 K per year, 61 K retroactive and unpaid arrears |
|
85 |
85 |
44.5 |
40.5 |
17.1 |
35.6 |
23.4 |
(12.2) |
24.7 |
|
b |
s |
Wood v. Wood, 2004 CanLII 19028 (ON S.C.) |
1308 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal support per month, 1.1 K child support per month and $ 208 per month s.7 expenses, 13.6 K arrears, retroactive arrears, man makes 85 K wife makes 24.7 K |
|
65 |
65 |
11.4 |
53.6 |
14.3 |
0.0 |
39.3 |
39.3 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Haney v. Haney, 2005 CanLII 19835 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
750 |
$ 750 spousal support and $ 200 child support, man earns 65 K per year and wife earns 25 K per year |
|
74.4 |
74.4 |
24.7 |
49.7 |
16.3 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Wolpin v. Wolpin, 2006 CanLII 8727 (ON S.C.) |
973 |
1000 |
$ 973 child support and $ 1000 spousal support, spousal lowered to $ 750, s.7 expenses, man has income of 74.4 K and wife has income of 25 K |
|
77 |
77 |
24.4 |
52.6 |
16.9 |
0.0 |
36.7 |
36.7 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 30710 (ON S.C.) |
631 |
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support, $ 631 child support to end shortly as child gets employment, wifes income 25 K mans income 77 K |
|
81 |
81 |
22.8 |
58.2 |
17.6 |
0.0 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
McGahey v. McGahey, 2006 CanLII 5456 (ON S.C.) |
692 |
1200 |
1.2 K interim spousal support per month and $ 692 per month child support, man earns 81 K and wife is imputed to 25 K per year |
|
83 |
83 |
20.7 |
62.3 |
20.9 |
36.2 |
41.4 |
5.2 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Hofsteede v. Hofsteede, 2006 CanLII 2052 (ON S.C.) |
925 |
800 |
$ 925 child support and $ 800 spousal support, separation agreement overturned, 1 year 9 months retroactive arrears, mans income 83 K and wifes income 25 K per year |
|
89.8 |
89.8 |
26.4 |
63.4 |
22.0 |
8.0 |
41.4 |
33.4 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 9982 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1100 |
1.1 K spousal support per month, 1.1 K child support per month, 8 K damage award for domestic assault, man income 89.8 K and wifes income 25 K per year |
|
100 |
48 |
31.2 |
68.8 |
33.9 |
0.0 |
34.9 |
34.9 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Wilson-Embree v. Embree, 2007 CanLII 36636 (ON S.C.) |
1600 |
1000 |
1.6 K per month child support and 1 K per month spousal support, man claims 48 K income and is imputed to 100 K and wife is imputed to 25 K per year |
|
115 |
115 |
25.2 |
89.8 |
37.8 |
0.0 |
52.0 |
52.0 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
D.J.C. v. N.C., 2004 CanLII 47783 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
1500 |
1.5 K per month spousal support, 0.6 K per month child support, man makes 115 K per year and wife is imputed to 25 K per year |
|
170 |
165 |
74.1 |
95.9 |
57.5 |
0.0 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
25 |
|
b |
s |
Hewat v. Hewat, 2003 CanLII 2131 (ON S.C.) |
2500 |
3000 |
3 K spousal support per month, 2.5 K child support per month, s.7 expenses, man claims 165 K income and is imputed to 170 K, wife is unemployed and is imputed to 25 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
8.4 |
27.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
26 |
|
b |
s |
Coyle v. Danylkiw, 2002 CanLII 2681 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
$ 700 per month total support changed from $ 1500, man claims income of 36 K and wife has income of 26 K |
|
55 |
55 |
7.6 |
47.4 |
14.0 |
2.9 |
33.4 |
30.5 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 1976 (ON S.C.) |
635 |
|
$ 468 child support for remaining dependant, must pay 2 K directly to older daughter, 2.9 K arrears, man makes 55 K and wife makes 26 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
6.0 |
54.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
38.4 |
38.4 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Lee v. Lee, 2006 CanLII 5612 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 child support, $ 500 spousal, child support ended, man makes 60 K and wife makes 26 K |
|
72 |
72 |
9.6 |
62.4 |
19.3 |
28.7 |
43.1 |
14.4 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, retroactive 23 K lump sum award, retroactive arrears, mans income 72 K and wifes income 26 K |
|
275 |
275 |
24.8 |
250.2 |
123.0 |
24.0 |
127.0 |
103.0 |
26 |
|
c |
s |
Cowie v. Makin, 2004 CanLII 5762 (ON S.C.) |
2065 |
|
$ 2065 per month in child support, 24 K arrears set against equalization, mans income 275 K and wifes income changed from 110 K to 26 K per year |
|
272 |
272 |
52.1 |
219.9 |
108.0 |
22.0 |
111.9 |
89.9 |
26.3 |
|
b |
y |
Horner v. Horner, 2004 CanLII 34381 (ON C.A.) |
1900 |
2445 |
2.4 K spousal support per month, 1.9 K child support, retroactive arrears, man makes 272 K per year and wife makes 26.3 K |
|
53 |
53 |
10.2 |
42.8 |
11.9 |
0.0 |
30.9 |
30.9 |
28 |
|
b |
s |
Howlett v. Howlett, 2004 CanLII 21288 (ON S.C.) |
454 |
400 |
$ 454 child support and $ 400 spousal, mans income 53 K per year and wifes income 28 K |
|
33 |
33 |
3.5 |
29.5 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
28 |
|
c |
o |
Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) |
294 |
|
$ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K |
|
53.4 |
53.4 |
5.9 |
47.5 |
13.5 |
1.4 |
34.0 |
32.6 |
28 |
|
c |
s |
Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) |
494 |
|
$ 494 per month child support, arrears 1.4 K, mans income 53.4 K and wifes income 28 K |
|
110 |
110 |
19.0 |
91.0 |
39.5 |
0.0 |
51.5 |
51.5 |
28.1 |
|
b |
s |
Gerlach v. Gerlach, 2003 CanLII 2125 (ON S.C.) |
836 |
750 |
$ 836 child support and $ 750 spousal support, man makes 110 K per year and wife makes 28.1 K |
|
93.6 |
93.6 |
22.2 |
71.4 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
38.8 |
38.8 |
28.6 |
|
b |
s |
Nye v. Nye, 2004 CanLII 5069 (ON S.C.) |
1150 |
700 |
$ 700 spousal and $ 650 child and $ 500 s,7, changed to $ 1500 spousal support as child graduates, husbands income 93.6 K, wifes income 28.6 K per year |
|
35 |
35 |
10.7 |
24.3 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
19.0 |
16.5 |
29.1 |
|
c |
s |
McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
893 |
|
Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year |
|
48 |
48 |
11.0 |
37.0 |
8.8 |
10.0 |
28.2 |
18.2 |
30.0 |
|
b |
s |
Cook v. Burton, 2005 CanLII 1063 (ON S.C.) |
789 |
125 |
$ 413 and $ 376 s.7 child support and $ 125 per month spousal support 10 K arrears, charging order on house, mans income 48 K wifes income 30 K |
|
75.4 |
75.4 |
24.1 |
51.3 |
18.5 |
9.3 |
32.8 |
23.5 |
30 |
|
b |
s |
Lobesack v. Lobesack, 2003 CanLII 2171 (ON S.C.) |
1506 |
500 |
$ 1231 per month child support and retroactive $275 per month daycare expense and $ 500 per month spousal support, arrears 9.3 K, man has income of 75.4 K and wife has income of 30 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
24.8 |
55.2 |
19.0 |
11.4 |
36.2 |
24.8 |
30 |
|
b |
s |
Toms v. Toms, 2007 CanLII 50879 (ON S.C.) |
1317 |
750 |
$ 1317 per month child support, $ 750 per month spousal support, 8 K arrears spousal support reduced from 13 K and 3.4 K child support arrears, man makes 80 K per year and wife makes 30 K |
|
82 |
82 |
24.0 |
58.0 |
16.8 |
3.6 |
41.2 |
37.6 |
30 |
|
b |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2003 CanLII 2300 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
1500 |
$1500 spousal support and $ 500 child support, 3.6 K retroactive arrears, mans income 82 K wifes income 30 K |
|
110 |
110 |
45.6 |
64.4 |
21.1 |
3.3 |
42.9 |
39.6 |
30 |
|
b |
s |
Doino v. Doino, 2004 CanLII 34773 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
3000 |
3 K spousal support per month, 0.8 K child support per month, order vesting family home, mans income 110 K and wifes income 30 K per year, 3.3 K costs |
|
147 |
147 |
37.2 |
109.8 |
58.0 |
22.0 |
51.8 |
29.8 |
30 |
|
b |
s |
C.R.M. v. F.J.F., 2007 CanLII 53242 (ON S.C.)
|
2099 |
1000 |
$ 1974 child support per month and $ 125 per month s.7 expense, $ 1000 per month spousal support, 22 K retroactive arrears, mans income 147 K, wife claims 9.6 K and is imputed to 30 K, man |
|
28 |
28 |
9.5 |
18.5 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
14.7 |
11.7 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) |
789 |
|
$ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year |
|
48 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
42.3 |
11.8 |
14.0 |
30.5 |
16.5 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
$ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year |
|
58 |
58 |
7.5 |
50.5 |
14.9 |
18.2 |
36.5 |
18.3 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
L.K. v. G.K., 2007 CanLII 9612 (ON S.C.) |
496 |
|
$ 496 per month child support, s.7 expenses, change of residence of child to mother, father owes 18.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K and womans income 30 K |
|
5000 |
5000 |
228.0 |
4772.0 |
2315.8 |
0.0 |
2456.2 |
2456.2 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Quinn v. Keiper, 2005 CanLII 43685 (ON S.C.) |
19000 |
|
10 million equalization, 5 K per month child support, father pays between 10 and 18.5 K per month s.7 expenses, man makes 5000 K and wife makes 30 K per year |
|
179 |
179 |
19.6 |
159.4 |
78.4 |
25.0 |
81.0 |
56.0 |
30.3 |
|
c |
s |
Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
|
1.3 K per month child support, 87 % of s.7 expenses, 25 K, arrears, fathers income 179 K and mothers income 30.3 K per year |
|
39 |
39 |
8.9 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
24.0 |
18.3 |
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)
|
740 |
|
$ 740 per month child support, retroactive arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum, refused set off with 37 % of time, man earns 39 K wife earns 30.5 K |
|
44.7 |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
c |
s |
Sills v. Sills, 2002 CanLII 2705 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Guideline support for 3 children and an unspecified portion of s.7 expenses, father earns 44.7 K and mother earns 30.5 K per year |
|
67 |
67 |
12.1 |
54.9 |
16.3 |
0.0 |
38.6 |
38.6 |
31 |
|
b |
s |
Callaghan v. Campbell, 2005 CanLII 32922 (ON S.C.) |
441 |
400 |
$ 441 child support and $ 400 spousal support, mans income 67 K and wifes income 31 K, both spouses haver new families with 100 K total incomes, father pays 68 % s.7 expenses |
|
49.5 |
49.5 |
7.8 |
41.7 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
Simmonds v. Simmonds, 2007 CanLII 8007 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 450 per month and $ 200 per month in s.7 expenses, father earns 49.5 K and mother earns 31 K |
|
138 |
138 |
23.7 |
114.3 |
59.4 |
0.0 |
54.9 |
54.9 |
31 |
|
c |
s |
McCrea v. McCrea, 2005 CanLII 378 (ON S.C.) |
1640 |
|
$ 1640 per month child support reduced from $ 2850, s.7 expenses, father has 138 K income and mother has 31 K income |
|
70 |
0.0 |
18.2 |
51.8 |
18.3 |
76.0 |
33.5 |
(42.5) |
31.5 |
|
b |
s |
J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.) |
1413 |
100 |
$ 1413 child support including s.7 expenses, retroactive with 40 K arrears, $ 100 per month spousal support, retroactive 3.6 K award, unemployed and income imputed to 70 K, wife makes 31.5 K per year |
|
96 |
96 |
21.7 |
73.4 |
25.3 |
0.0 |
48.2 |
48.2 |
31.8 |
|
b |
s |
Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.) |
868 |
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support and $ 605 per month child support and $ 263 for s.7 expenses, vesting order on home, wife gets 167.6 K from equalization, 10 K interim lump payment, mans income 96 K and wifes income 31.8 K |
|
66.3 |
66.3 |
11.9 |
54.4 |
17.5 |
4.9 |
36.5 |
31.6 |
32 |
|
c |
s |
Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) |
992 |
|
$ 992 per month child support, husband makes $ 1400 per month mortgage payments too, mans income 66.3 K and wifes income 32 K per year |
|
141 |
141 |
49.2 |
91.8 |
44.4 |
0.0 |
47.4 |
47.4 |
32.8 |
|
b |
s |
Sandor v. Sandor, 2004 CanLII 19143 (ON S.C.) |
1700 |
2400 |
2.4 K per month spousal support, 1.7 K per month child support, man makes 141 K and wife makes 32.8 K per year |
|
384 |
384 |
137.7 |
363.3 |
145.7 |
97.0 |
217.6 |
120.6 |
33 |
|
b |
y |
MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2005 CanLII 13191 (ON C.A.) |
5800 |
5000 |
52 K lump sum and 5 K per month spousal support, 5.8 K per month child support, s.7 expenses and retroactive arrears, wife earns 33 K and husband earns 384 K per year, 12 K costs |
|
100 |
80 |
31.8 |
68.2 |
33.9 |
36.0 |
34.3 |
(1.7) |
33.6 |
|
b |
s |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2776 (ON S.C.) |
1650 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, 1.6 K per month child support and $ 50 per month s.7 expense, 36 K arrears, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 33.6 K per year |
|
1624 |
0.0 |
121.2 |
1502.8 |
749.1 |
22.0 |
753.7 |
731.7 |
33.7 |
|
c |
s |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
10100 |
|
10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year |
|
49 |
49 |
11.2 |
37.8 |
12.1 |
2.0 |
25.7 |
23.7 |
34.0 |
|
c |
s |
B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) |
806 |
|
$ 683 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses, father earns 49 K mother earns 34 K, costs 2 K |
|
61 |
61 |
17.8 |
43.2 |
13.5 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
35.0 |
|
b |
s |
Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, 2005 CanLII 6048 (ON S.C.) |
834 |
650 |
$ 834 per month child support and $ 650 per month for a nanny, mans income 61 K and wifes income 35 K |
|
90 |
70 |
20.5 |
69.5 |
22.4 |
3.0 |
47.1 |
44.1 |
35.0 |
|
b |
s |
Hachey v. Hachey, 2007 CanLII 52987 (ON S.C.) |
706 |
1000 |
$ 706 per month child support and $ 1000 per month spousal support, man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 90 K, wife claims 15 K per year and is imputed to 35 K, 3 K costs |
|
1296 |
176 |
291.6 |
1004.4 |
546.7 |
0.0 |
457.7 |
457.7 |
35.0 |
|
b |
s |
Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.) |
15300 |
9000 |
9 K per month spousal support, 15.3 K per month child support, man claims 176 K salary and income is imputed to 1296 K, wifes income imputed to 35 K |
|
65 |
65 |
14.2 |
50.8 |
17.1 |
0.0 |
33.7 |
33.7 |
35.0 |
|
c |
s |
Jones v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 23318 (ON S.C.) |
1182 |
|
$ 2260 per month child support reduced to $ 1182 by separation agreement, man makes 65 K and wife makes 35 K per year |
|
116 |
25 |
14.6 |
101.4 |
46.0 |
21.1 |
55.4 |
34.3 |
35.0 |
|
c |
o |
Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) |
880 |
|
$ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs |
|
200 |
200 |
57.1 |
142.7 |
77.0 |
21.0 |
65.7 |
44.7 |
35.2 |
|
b |
s |
Johnson v. McFadyen, 2005 CanLII 8727 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
2000 |
2 K spousal support per month, 2.1 K child support per month, 84 % s.7 expenses, retroactive 21 K lump sum, man makes 200 K and wife makes 35.2 K per year |
|
40 |
40 |
3.9 |
36.1 |
6.3 |
5.7 |
29.8 |
24.1 |
35.6 |
|
c |
o |
Cook v. Cleverdon, 2005 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) |
325 |
|
$ 325 per month child support, retroactive arrears, father pays $ 300 in support for other children from other marriages also, mothers income 35.6 K and fathers income 40 K |
|
95 |
95 |
19.3 |
75.7 |
33.0 |
0.0 |
42.7 |
42.7 |
35.8 |
|
b |
s |
Young v. O'Neil, 2003 CanLII 2370 (ON S.C.) |
746 |
750 |
$ 746 per month child support and s.7 expenses and $ 750 per month spousal support, mans income 96 K wifes income 35. 8 K per year |
|
23.5 |
23.5 |
5.2 |
18.3 |
2.8 |
5.7 |
15.5 |
9.8 |
35.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.)
|
435 |
|
$ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K |
|
45.0 |
45 |
9.3 |
35.7 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
28.3 |
28.3 |
36.0 |
|
c |
s |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and $ 140 s.7 expenses, mans income 45 K per year and wifes income is 36 K per year |
|
52.8 |
52.8 |
13.1 |
39.7 |
12.4 |
0.0 |
27.3 |
27.34 |
36.5 |
|
b |
s |
Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 9601 (ON S.C.) |
839 |
250 |
$ 739 and $ 100 s.7 child support per month and $ 250 spousal support, man earns 52.8 K per year and wife earns 36.5 K per year |
|
91 |
40 |
28.6 |
62.4 |
25.5 |
0.0 |
36.9 |
36.9 |
37 |
|
b |
s |
Sherwood v. Sherwood, 2006 CanLII 40795 (ON S.C.) |
1299 |
750 |
$ 1299 per month child support and $ 750 per month temporary spousal support, s.7 expenses, man earns 40 K per year and is imputed to 91 K, wife earns 37 K per year |
|
43.9 |
43.9 |
10.1 |
33.8 |
7.1 |
16.9 |
26.7 |
9.8 |
37.4 |
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) |
843 |
|
$ 763 per month child support plus $ 80 per month s.7 expenses, 3.2 K retroactive arrears and 10.4 K arrears, mans income 43.9 K and wifes income 37.4 K per year, 3.3 K costs |
|
46 |
46 |
10.6 |
35.4 |
8.7 |
6.5 |
26.7 |
20.2 |
37.6 |
|
c |
s |
Cava v. Cava, 2005 CanLII 19815 (ON S.C.) |
760 |
|
$ 660 for both children and 1.2 K per year s.7 expense and $ 859 retroactive s.7 expense, arrears, retroactive monthly award, mans income 46 K and wifes income 37.6 K per year |
|
28 |
23 |
3.0 |
25.0 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
21.2 |
21.2 |
37.9 |
|
c |
o |
Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K |
|
62.5 |
62.5 |
6.1 |
56.1 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
38 |
|
b |
s |
Oxley v. Oxley, 2003 CanLII 2194 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
275 |
$ 237 child support and $ 275 spousal support, fathers income 62.5 K mothers income 38 K |
|
70 |
18.5 |
9.2 |
60.8 |
18.7 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
38 |
|
c |
o |
Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) |
766 |
|
$ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K |
|
94 |
94 |
12.0 |
82.0 |
36.5 |
0.0 |
45.5 |
45.5 |
38.2 |
|
c |
s |
Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2187 (ON S.C.)
|
998 |
|
$ 998 total child support per month including $ 277 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 94 K and wifes income 38.2 K per year |
|
154 |
154 |
63.3 |
90.1 |
66.8 |
40.0 |
23.3 |
(16.7) |
38.5 |
|
c |
s |
D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) |
4600 |
|
4.6 K per month child support including 75 % s.7 expenses, 40 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 154 K per year and wife makes 38.5 K |
|
138 |
138 |
24.0 |
114.0 |
59.4 |
40.0 |
54.6 |
14.6 |
39.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bond v. Bond, 2007 CanLII 41898 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
2000 |
|
2 K per month for 2 children, retroactive child support of 40 K, mans income 138 K per year and wifes income 39 K per year |
|
22 |
11 |
9.2 |
12.8 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
39.4 |
|
c |
s |
Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year |
|
31.9 |
31.9 |
7.2 |
24.7 |
4.6 |
19.0 |
20.1 |
1.1 |
39.6 |
|
c |
o |
Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) |
478 |
|
$ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears |
|
96 |
96 |
28.4 |
67.9 |
35.9 |
40.9 |
32.0 |
(8.9) |
40 |
|
b |
s |
Ahern v. Ahern, 2007 CanLII 37672 (ON S.C.) |
1762 |
270 |
$ 1762 per month child support, $ 270 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses and retroactive support of 35.9 K, 5 K costs, man makes 96 K and wife makes 40 K per year |
|
115 |
51.4 |
27.9 |
87.1 |
37.8 |
100.0 |
49.3 |
(50.7) |
40.0 |
|
b |
s |
O'Brien v. Griffin, 2004 CanLII 10709 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
1500 |
1.5 K per month spousal support, 0.7 K child support and s.7 expenses, 100 K arrears with some small retroactive recission, s.140 courts of justice act order requiring leave, man claims 51.4 K revenue and is imputed to 115 K, wife makes 40 K per year |
|
77 |
77 |
19.9 |
57.1 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
40 |
|
c |
s |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) |
1659 |
|
$ 1001 per month child support and special expenses up to $ 658 per month, husband earns 77 K per year and wife earns 40 K per year |
|
175 |
20 |
12.1 |
162.9 |
76.6 |
59.0 |
86.3 |
27.3 |
40 |
|
c |
y |
Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) |
1010 |
|
$ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income |
|
777 |
777 |
107.7 |
669.3 |
356.0 |
0.0 |
313.3 |
313.4 |
40 |
|
c |
s |
Bladwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 878 (ON S.C.) |
8300 |
|
8.3 K per month child support and 95 % of s.7 expenses |
|
64.6 |
64.6 |
12.0 |
52.6 |
15.1 |
65.0 |
37.5 |
(27.5) |
41 |
|
b |
s |
Friend v. Paul, 2006 CanLII 44273 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
500 |
$ 500 spousal support and 250 child support and $ 250 s.7 expenses, 65 K arrears reduced to 40 K., mans income 64.6 K and wifes income 41 K per year |
|
146 |
146 |
34.6 |
111.4 |
49.7 |
0.0 |
61.7 |
61.7 |
41 |
|
b |
s |
Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.) |
1381 |
1800 |
$ 1081 per month child support and $ 300 per month s.7 expense and $ 1800 spousal support, husbands income 146 K and wifes income 41 K per year |
|
103 |
103 |
25.2 |
77.8 |
35.2 |
0.0 |
42.6 |
42.6 |
41.3 |
|
b |
s |
Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K spousal support per month, 1.1 K child support per month, man makes 102 K per year wife makes 41.3 K |
|
221 |
221 |
47.4 |
173.6 |
97.9 |
(16.3) |
75.7 |
92.0 |
41.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zimmerman v. Doe, 2007 CanLII 28755 (ON S.C.) |
3977 |
|
$ 2500 per month child support and s.7 expenses of $ 1477 per month and reimbursement for 16.3 K prior s.7 expenses, man makes 221 K per year and wife makes 41.9 K |
|
74 |
74 |
35.5 |
38.5 |
18.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
42 |
|
b |
s |
Rheault-Momy v. Momy, 2007 CanLII 50109 (ON S.C.) |
2561 |
400 |
$ 1085 per month child support and $ 1476 per month s.7 expense and $ 400 per month spousal support, man makes 74 K and wife makes 42 K per year |
|
37 |
22 |
9.8 |
27.2 |
5.7 |
0.0 |
21.5 |
21.5 |
42 |
|
c |
s |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
820 |
|
$ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year |
|
56 |
56 |
8.8 |
47.2 |
14.3 |
(6.4) |
32.9 |
39.3 |
42 |
|
c |
s |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) |
731 |
|
$ 731 per month child support, overpayment of 6.4 K, mans income is 56 K and wifes income is 42 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
10.5 |
55.5 |
16.1 |
5.7 |
39.4 |
33.7 |
42.9 |
|
b |
s |
Rockfeller v. Rockfeller, 2005 CanLII 14325 (ON S.C.) |
529 |
350 |
$ 350 per month spousal support and $ 529 per month child support and 91 per month s.7 expenses, 1.6 K retroactive child support, 4.1 K arrears of s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wife earns 42.9 K per year |
|
175 |
94 |
46.3 |
128.7 |
68.2 |
22.0 |
60.5 |
38.5 |
42.9 |
|
b |
s |
Meliambro v. Meliambro, 2007 CanLII 51344 (ON S.C.) |
2359 |
1500 |
2.2 K per month child support and $ 159 per month s.7 expense, 1.5 K per month spousal support, man claims 94 K income from 3 year average and is imputed to current 175 K, retroactive arrears for past period |
|
127 |
127 |
22.8 |
104.2 |
50.8 |
11.7 |
53.4 |
41.7 |
43.8 |
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) |
1897 |
|
$ 1721 per month child support, $ 176 s.7 expense per month and 2 K retroactive award, retroactive arrears, fathers income 126.6 K mothers income 43.8 K per year |
|
122 |
122 |
39.6 |
82.4 |
42.4 |
0.0 |
40.0 |
40.0 |
44 |
|
b |
s |
McGinn v. McGinn, 2006 CanLII 3281 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
1200 |
1.2 K per month spousal support and 1.5 K child support per month except in 3 summer months 0.92 K, $ 614 per month in s.7 expense, retroactivity reserved for trial, mans income 122 K, wifes net income 62 K imputed to 44 K for support purposes |
|
42 |
42 |
4.9 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
46 |
|
c |
s |
Kimmerly v. Parks, 2005 CanLII 40368 (ON S.C.) |
410 |
|
$ 410 total child support per month, 9 K arrears to be paid $ 100 per month, $ 48 per month s.7 expenses retroactive, mans income 42 K and wife earns 46 K per year, |
|
100 |
100 |
27.0 |
73.0 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
33.9 |
33.9 |
46.1 |
|
c |
s |
Johnson v. Castellano, 2006 CanLII 34434 (ON S.C.) |
2250 |
|
$ 1825 per month child support and $ 425 per month s.7 expenses, man is given support reduction for lower earnings due to depression but must now assume former income, wife makes 46.1 K per year |
|
161 |
117 |
24.2 |
136.8 |
70.1 |
70.0 |
65.3 |
(47.0) |
46.3 |
|
c |
s |
Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) |
2020 |
|
$ 2020 per month child support, 70 K lump sum spousal support, man makes 161 K and wife makes 46.3 K per year, man must continue to pay on separation agreement despite claiming lower 117 K income |
|
50 |
50 |
12.0 |
38.0 |
12.5 |
30.0 |
25.5 |
(4.5) |
47 |
|
c |
s |
Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) |
1003 |
|
$ 753 per month child support and 3 K per year s.7 expenses, 19 K arrears, mans income 50 K, wife earns 47 K per year, 11 K costs |
|
89 |
89 |
16.8 |
72.2 |
34.3 |
18.0 |
37.9 |
19.9 |
47.9 |
|
c |
s |
Clarke v. Clarke, 2007 CanLII 50596 (ON S.C.) |
1063 |
|
$ 1063 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 18 K arrears, man makes 89 K and wife makes 47.9 K |
|
45.9 |
45.9 |
10.3 |
35.6 |
6.8 |
20.0 |
28.8 |
8.8 |
48 |
|
b |
s |
Boileau v. Boileau, 2003 CanLII 2288 (ON S.C.) |
555 |
300 |
$ 300 per month in spousal support and $ 555 in child support to be changed to $ 600 in spousal support when children are not dependants, 20 K arrears, man has income of 45.9 K, wife has income of 48 K, man is waiting for bankruptcy clearance |
|
60.6 |
0.0 |
11.5 |
49.1 |
15.8 |
2.8 |
33.3 |
30.5 |
48.8 |
|
c |
s |
Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
830 |
|
$ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year |
|
53.5 |
53.5 |
7.0 |
46.5 |
13.6 |
5.7 |
32.9 |
27.2 |
49 |
|
c |
s |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 580 per month child support plus retroactive arrears of 5.7 K, fathers income 53.5 K and mothers income 49 K |
|
80 |
80 |
18.9 |
61.1 |
21.8 |
25.0 |
39.3 |
14.3 |
49 |
|
c |
s |
Zlatar v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 22344 (ON S.C.) |
1241 |
|
$ 908 per month child support, 4 K per year s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears, man makes 80 K and wife makes 49 K per year. |
|
97 |
47 |
14.4 |
82.6 |
33.9 |
11.5 |
48.7 |
37.2 |
50 |
|
b |
s |
Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.) |
324 |
750 |
$ 324 per month child support and $ 750 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses, man claims 49 K income and is imputed to 97 K, wifes income 50 K per year, 5.8 K retroactive lump sum spousal support and 5.7 K retroactive child support arrears |
|
106 |
106 |
27.1 |
78.9 |
36.5 |
0.0 |
42.4 |
42.4 |
50 |
|
b |
s |
Ansara v. Ansara, 2007 CanLII 6237 (ON S.C.) |
924 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month interim spousal support and $ 924 per month child support, S.7 expenses, man earns 106 K per year wife earns 50 K per year |
|
40 |
20 |
8.8 |
31.2 |
6.3 |
9.6 |
24.9 |
15.3 |
50 |
|
c |
o |
Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII)
|
737 |
|
$ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K |
|
70 |
70 |
19.9 |
50.1 |
18.7 |
9.5 |
31.4 |
21.9 |
50 |
|
c |
o |
Griffiths v. Griffiths, 2007 ONCJ 26 (CanLII) |
1322 |
|
$ 1322 per month child support plus dental expense, 9.5 K arrears, man makes 70 K and wife makes 50 K per year |
|
150 |
150 |
37.2 |
112.8 |
50.4 |
0.0 |
62.4 |
62.4 |
51 |
|
b |
s |
Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
2000 |
2 K spousal support per month, 1.1 K child support per month, husband has income of 150 K imputed to him and wife has income of 51 K imputed to her |
|
133 |
64.7 |
28.0 |
105.0 |
48.2 |
11.0 |
56.8 |
45.8 |
51.8 |
|
b |
s |
Aitken v. Aitken, 2003 CanLII 2050 (ON S.C.) |
996 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 996 child support, S.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive spousal support, man claims 67.4 K income and is imputed to 133 K, wife makes 51.8 K per year |
|
54 |
54 |
10.6 |
43.4 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
29.7 |
25.7 |
52.0 |
|
c |
s |
Dodd v. Dodd, 2003 CanLII 2100 (ON S.C.) |
755 |
|
$ 755 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears, fathers income 54 K and wifes income 52 K per year |
|
49 |
49 |
9.9 |
39.1 |
12.1 |
9.7 |
27.0 |
17.3 |
53.0 |
|
c |
o |
Hillier v. Hillier, 2005 ONCJ 120 (CanLII) |
700 |
|
$ 700 per month child support, 9.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 49 K wife makes 53 K per year |
|
290 |
290 |
39.6 |
250.4 |
129.9 |
50.0 |
120.1 |
70.1 |
54.0 |
|
c |
s |
Monaghan v. Monaghan, 2002 CanLII 2676 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
3.3 K per month child support, man pays 50 K per year of childrens university expenses, man makes 290 K and wife makes 54 K per year |
|
189 |
169 |
27.3 |
161.7 |
73.6 |
35.0 |
88.1 |
53.1 |
54.6 |
|
b |
y |
Allaire v. Allaire, 2003 CanLII 26263 (ON C.A.) |
572 |
1700 |
1.7 K spousal support per month, $ 572 child support, 35 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 189 K per year |
|
146 |
146 |
44.7 |
101.3 |
58.9 |
2.6 |
42.4 |
39.8 |
56 |
|
b |
s |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.) |
1896 |
1500 |
1.5 K per month spousal support, 1.7 K per month child support and $ 196 per month and 65 % of university expense as s.7 expenses, 2.6 K retroactive s.7 arrears, income imputed to 139 K, wifes income 56 K |
|
66 |
31 |
6.6 |
59.4 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
42.0 |
42.0 |
57 |
|
c |
s |
Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) |
550 |
|
$ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K |
|
147 |
147 |
39.3 |
107.7 |
63.6 |
25.0 |
44.1 |
19.1 |
57 |
|
c |
s |
Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2311 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
2.6 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears,mans income 147 K including overtime and wifes income 57 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
6.5 |
29.5 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
24.0 |
21.6 |
60 |
|
c |
s |
L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) |
545 |
|
$ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K |
|
30.5 |
30.5 |
8.2 |
22.3 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
60.9 |
|
c |
s |
Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K |
|
50 |
50 |
9.3 |
40.7 |
12.5 |
7.2 |
28.2 |
21.0 |
61 |
|
c |
s |
Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) |
777 |
|
$ 777 per month child support, 7.2 K arrears, man makes 50 K and wife makes 61 K |
|
61 |
61 |
10.6 |
50.4 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
63 |
|
c |
o |
Bertram v. Murdock, 2006 ONCJ 69 (CanLII |
880 |
|
$ 531 child support when child is at home and $ 406 when at school, $ 4550 per year tuition expenses, father makes 61 K and mother makes 63 K per year |
|
150 |
150 |
31.2 |
118.8 |
65.0 |
0.0 |
53.8 |
53.8 |
63 |
|
c |
s |
Ruel v. Juodis, 2005 CanLII 14133 (ON S.C.) |
2600 |
|
$ 1233 per month child support and $ 675 s.7 expense and $ 690 discretionary extra expense per month, man makes 150 K and wife makes 40 K and is imputed to 63 K per year |
|
128 |
128 |
46.8 |
81.2 |
25.2 |
34.7 |
56.0 |
21.3 |
63.4 |
|
b |
s |
Innes v. Innes, 2005 CanLII 15463 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
1900 |
3900 |
2 K spousal support per month retroactive, 1.9 K child support per month, Man makes 128 K per year and wife makes 63.4 K, 25 K costs |
|
50 |
12 |
13.4 |
36.6 |
12.5 |
19.0 |
24.1 |
5.1 |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
1116 |
|
$ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K |
|
63.7 |
40 |
12.0 |
51.7 |
16.7 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) |
996 |
|
$ 866 child support with $ 130 s.7 expenses, man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 63.7 K, wifes income 64 K per year |
|
125 |
125 |
22.7 |
102.3 |
45.2 |
2.0 |
57.1 |
55.1 |
65 |
|
b |
s |
Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2005 CanLII 19837 (ON S.C.) |
995 |
900 |
$ 940 child support plus $ 55 s.7 expenses and $ 900 spousal support, 2 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man has inome of 125 K and wife has income of 65 K |
|
30 |
30 |
9.9 |
20.1 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
65 |
|
c |
s |
R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) |
827 |
|
$ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K |
|
40 |
6.5 |
11.0 |
29.0 |
6.3 |
49.5 |
22.7 |
(26.8) |
65 |
|
c |
s |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
920 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears |
|
54 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
48.6 |
13.7 |
54.0 |
34.9 |
(19.1) |
65 |
|
c |
y |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.)
|
454 |
|
$ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs |
|
73.5 |
73.5 |
6.9 |
66.6 |
20.9 |
61.6 |
45.7 |
(15.9) |
65.5 |
|
c |
s |
Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) |
577 |
|
$ 577 per month child support and 4.5 K additional retroactive s.7 expense, 57.1 K lump sum award, wife may reapply for periodic support, man makes 73.5 K and wife makes 65.5 K per year |
|
118 |
118 |
14.9 |
103.1 |
46.9 |
19.0 |
56.2 |
37.2 |
67.0 |
|
c |
s |
Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) |
1245 |
|
$ 1020 child support and $ 225 s.7 expenses. 19 K retroactive arrears, man makes 118 K and wife makes 67 K |
|
61 |
61 |
9.2 |
51.8 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
35.9 |
35.9 |
69.0 |
|
c |
s |
Matwiyw v. Matwiyw, 2004 CanLII 7764 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 841 child support order varied to $ 770, fathers income 61 K mothers income 69 K |
|
656 |
35 |
138.0 |
518.0 |
285.9 |
580.0 |
232.1 |
(347.9) |
70 |
|
b |
s |
Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 CanLII 15236 (ON S.C.) |
9000 |
2500 |
9 K per month child support and 2.5 K per month spousal support, 580 K arrears, variation stayed until husband pays 100 K security, husband claims 35 K income but must continue paying on imputed income of 656 K, wife claims 70 K per year income, husband is imprisoned and leaves the country |
|
160 |
160 |
18.8 |
141.2 |
64.1 |
7.0 |
76.9 |
69.9 |
72.3 |
|
b |
s |
McLean v. McLean, 2004 CanLII 34800 (ON S.C.) |
563 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 563 per month in child support, 7 months retroative spousal support, mans income 160 K and wifes income 72.3 K per year |
|
120 |
95 |
29.1 |
90.9 |
45.4 |
9.7 |
45.5 |
35.8 |
73.6 |
|
b |
s |
Rabicki v. Rabicki, 2007 CanLII 18740 (ON S.C.) |
1844 |
450 |
$ 1644 per month child support and s.7 expenses and $ 450 per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 95 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife makes 73.6 K per year |
|
165 |
165 |
27.7 |
137.3 |
71.9 |
3.9 |
65.4 |
61.5 |
75 |
|
c |
o |
Osmak-Bonk v. Bonk, 2004 ONCJ 167 (CanLII) |
2305 |
|
1.93 K per month child support and 9.4 K s.7 expense, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears 3.9 K, arrears, mans income 165 K, wifes income is 75 K per year |
|
320 |
320 |
50.1 |
269.9 |
143.9 |
53.0 |
125.1 |
72.1 |
75 |
|
c |
s |
Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) |
3500 |
|
3.5 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 28 K retroactive lump sum spousal support, man earns 25 K compensatory lump sum support, 320 K and wife earns 75 K per year |
|
559 |
559 |
46.5 |
512.5 |
254.8 |
22.0 |
257.2 |
235.2 |
76 |
|
c |
s |
Werden v. Werden, 2005 CanLII 45741 (ON S.C.) |
3875 |
|
3.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 559 K per year and wifes income 76 K per year |
|
139 |
139 |
12.0 |
127.0 |
59.9 |
0.0 |
67.1 |
67.1 |
91 |
|
c |
y |
Park v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 14132 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support in trust fund, man makes 139 K and wife makes 91 K, s.7 expenses, 70 K retroactive arrears overturned on appeal |
|
360 |
360 |
132.0 |
228.0 |
145.7 |
0.0 |
82.3 |
82.3 |
92.7 |
|
b |
s |
Selznick v. Selznick, 2002 CanLII 2778 (ON S.C.) |
8000 |
3000 |
5 K per month child support, 3 K s.7 expense, 6 K spousal support per month |
|
96 |
96 |
20.5 |
75.5 |
34.7 |
0.0 |
40.8 |
40.8 |
93.0 |
|
b |
s |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2004 CanLII 18436 (ON S.C.) |
1206 |
500 |
$ 1206 per month child support and $ 500 spousal support, s.7 expenses to be determined at trial, man has 96 K income and wife 93 K |
|
100 |
15 |
21.8 |
78.2 |
20.7 |
11.0 |
57.5 |
46.5 |
96.0 |
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
1820 |
|
$ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs |
|
88.2 |
30 |
9.8 |
78.4 |
18.0 |
12.0 |
60.4 |
48.4 |
120.0 |
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
694 |
|
$ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K |
|
90 |
90 |
10.0 |
80.0 |
34.7 |
9.1 |
45.3 |
36.2 |
182 |
|
c |
s |
Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) |
832 |
|
$ 832 now directly payable to daughter, s.7 expenses, 9.1 K retroactive arrears payable to mother from funds held for equalization, husband makes 90 K and wife makes 182 K per year |
|
787 |
328 |
117.6 |
669.4 |
360.6 |
22.0 |
308.8 |
286.8 |
193 |
|
c |
s |
Howe v. Tremblay, 2007 CanLII 44350 (ON S.C.) |
9800 |
|
5.7 K per month child support and 4.1 K per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims 328 K income and is imputed to 767 K as non recurring income is included, wifes income is 193 K per year |
|
706 |
706 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
250 |
|
b |
s |
Bower v. Bower, 2002 CanLII 2771 (ON S.C.) |
|
2702 |
Spousal support of $ 2072 and child support for 3 children set at 706 K income, retroactive arrears, wife earns 250 K per year |
|
769 |
769 |
106.5 |
662.5 |
352.3 |
107.0 |
310.2 |
203.2 |
270 |
|
c |
s |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) |
8200 |
|
72 K retroactive arrears of child support, 35 K retroactive arrears 75 % of s.7 expenses, 8.2 K per month child support, man makes 769 K per year and wife makes 270 K |
|
151 |
151 |
19.0 |
132.0 |
65.4 |
24.9 |
66.6 |
41.7 |
290.0 |
|
c |
s |
Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) |
1250 |
|
$ 1250 child support per month, 34 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, fathers income grossed up to 151.8 K and mothers 289.5 K per year, 15.2 K costs |
|
5500 |
745 |
276.0 |
5224.0 |
2547.9 |
951.0 |
2676.1 |
1725.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) |
23000 |
|
Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year |
|
75 |
75 |
33.6 |
41.4 |
6.6 |
0.0 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
25.0 |
|
s |
s |
Pinizzotto v. Pinizzotto, 2005 CanLII 34355 (ON S.C.) |
|
2800 |
77 K equalization payment, 2.8 K spousal support per month, 18 K in childrens education expenses, mans income 75 K, wife claims 15 K and is imputed to 25 K per year |
|
17 |
17 |
13.0 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
4.0 |
(16.0) |
|
|
s |
s |
Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) |
|
1080 |
$ 1080 per month spousal support, 5 K arrears, pleadings struck, house vested to wife, man makes 17 K on disability, 15 K costs |
|
18.9 |
18.9 |
7.2 |
11.7 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Kirkby v. Ellis, 2003 CanLII 2149 (ON S.C.) |
|
600 |
Varied from $ 1200 to $ 600 spousal support from separation agreement, man claims income of 18.9 k and wife is unemployed |
|
20 |
10 |
2.4 |
17.6 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
4.9 |
|
s |
s |
Goryjowski v. Goryjowska, 2005 CanLII 3395 (ON S.C.) |
|
200 |
$ 200 per month spousal support, income imputed by 10 K to 20 K for intentional unemployment, wife earns 4.9 K and lives in Poland |
|
20.0 |
20 |
0.9 |
19.1 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
s |
s |
Adams v. Adams, 2005 CanLII 34799 (ON S.C.) |
|
75 |
$ 75 per month interim spousal support, mans income 20 K |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
19.3 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
17.3 |
17.3 |
22.0 |
|
s |
s |
S.R.S. v. A.H.H., 2003 CanLII 2254 (ON S.C.) |
|
227 |
Unemployed man who has children during the day and every second weekend must pay employed wife $ 227 spousal support, income equal to wife imputed at 22 K per year |
|
22.1 |
22.1 |
4.2 |
17.9 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
16.2 |
16.2 |
7.7 |
|
s |
s |
Chandler v. Chandler, 2004 CanLII 862 (ON S.C.) |
|
350 |
Spousal support lowered to $ 350 per month due to retirement, man makes 22.1 and wife makes 7.7 K per year |
|
24 |
24 |
6.0 |
18.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
16.3 |
16.3 |
15.0 |
|
s |
s |
Calvert v. Calvert, 2002 CanLII 2706 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, wife claims 2000 K damages for abuse, mans income 24 K and wifes income 15 K |
|
24 |
16 |
13.2 |
11.8 |
0.4 |
9.7 |
11.4 |
1.7 |
|
|
s |
y |
Campbell v. Szoke, 2005 CanLII 1046 (ON C.A.) |
|
1100 |
$1100 per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, upheld on appeal, average income 16 K but man is imputed to 24 K |
|
25 |
17 |
4.8 |
20.2 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
18.1 |
18.1 |
30.0 |
|
s |
s |
Hoch v. Demetriou, 2007 CanLII 54960 (ON S.C.) |
|
400 |
$ 400 per month spousal support, wife makes over 30 K and husband claims 17 K but is imputed to 25 K |
|
25 |
25 |
9.0 |
16.0 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
|
|
s |
s |
Merrick v. Merrick, 2004 CanLII 12046 (ON S.C.) |
|
750 |
$ 750 per month spousal support reduced from $ 2400 per month total child and spousal support, mans income drops from 80 K to 25 K and both children cease to be dependants and woman gets 168 K payment from equalization. |
|
26.9 |
26.9 |
12.0 |
14.9 |
1.0 |
13.0 |
13.9 |
0.9 |
7.0 |
|
s |
s |
Girouard v. Girouard, 2006 CanLII 5606 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, mans income 26.9 K and wife gets 7 K per year on disability, 13 K arrears |
|
29.5 |
29.5 |
9.8 |
19.7 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
17.6 |
17.6 |
13.4 |
|
s |
s |
Stemberger v. Stemberger, 2007 CanLII 38580 (ON S.C.)
|
|
816 |
$ 816 per month spousal support until wife gets pension then reduced to $ 400, man has income of 29.5 and wife has income of 13.4 K per year |
|
30 |
30 |
6.0 |
24.0 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
35.0 |
|
s |
s |
Burns v. Burns, 2006 CanLII 2766 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, mutual non depletion order, man claims 30 K income and wife claims 35 K income |
|
30 |
30 |
8.4 |
21.6 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
19.1 |
19.1 |
5.5 |
|
s |
s |
Greaves v. Greaves, 2004 CanLII 25489 (ON S.C.) |
|
700 |
$ 700 per month spousal support, mans income equivalent to 30 K before tax and wifes income 5.5 K |
|
32 |
32 |
9.6 |
22.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
19.4 |
19.4 |
33.3 |
|
s |
s |
Tucker v. Tucker, 2002 CanLII 2819 (ON S.C.) |
|
800 |
$ 800 per month spousal support changed to $ 881 changed to $ 200 on retirement, husband makes 32 K and wife makes 33.3 K |
|
32 |
32 |
12.0 |
20.0 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
17.9 |
17.9 |
|
|
s |
s |
Barrick v. Barrick, 2006 CanLII 1317 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, man claims 32 K per year income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
32 |
32 |
10.2 |
21.8 |
2.5 |
40.0 |
19.3 |
(20.7) |
|
|
s |
s |
Valente v. Valente, 2005 CanLII 41388 (ON S.C.) |
|
850 |
$ 850 per month spousal support, mans income 32 K, 40 K cost award |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
6.0 |
25.5 |
3.3 |
5.7 |
22.3 |
16.5 |
11.5 |
|
s |
o |
Zedi (Ristic) v. Ristic, 2005 ONCJ 250 (CanLII) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support retroactive, mans income 32.5 K and wifes income 11.5 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
7.2 |
25.3 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
22.1 |
19.1 |
8.1 |
|
s |
s |
Bourget v. Bourget, 2006 CanLII 2888 (ON S.C.) |
|
600 |
Interim spousal support of $ 600, 3 K retroactive support, man has 32.5 K income and wife earns 8.1 K on disability |
|
33 |
33 |
21.6 |
11.4 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
|
|
s |
s |
Pourian v. Zaghian, 2007 CanLII 23594 (ON S.C.) |
|
1800 |
1.8 K per month spousal support declining to 1 K over time, man declares 33 K income, 2 children live with father |
|
33.1 |
33.1 |
9.6 |
23.5 |
2.8 |
3.2 |
20.7 |
17.5 |
11.4 |
|
s |
s |
Stewardson v. Stewardson, 2002 CanLII 2677 (ON S.C.) |
|
800 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support reduced to $ 800 , 3.2 K retroactive arrears, man makes 33.1 K and wife makes 11.4 K per year |
|
34 |
34 |
12.0 |
22.0 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
19.5 |
14.5 |
4.6 |
|
s |
s |
Bennett v. Bennett, 2003 CanLII 1957 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, topped up from $ 690 to be reviewed 5 months retroactive support, mans income 34 K from pension and wifes income 4.6 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
4.0 |
41.0 |
25.0 |
(16.0) |
19 |
|
s |
s |
Beal v. Beal, 2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support, 19.8 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 35 K per year, wife earns 19 K, 22 K costs |
|
36 |
35 |
3.6 |
32.4 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
18.0 |
|
s |
s |
Defoe v. Defoe, 2004 CanLII 5040 (ON S.C.) |
|
300 |
Current level of $ 300 per month spousal support continued, wife earns 18 K and husband earns 36 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
7.2 |
28.8 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
18.0 |
|
s |
s |
George v. MacLean, 2002 CanLII 2784 (ON S.C.) |
|
600 |
$ 600 per month spousal support indefinite, mans income is 36 K and wifes income is 18 K |
|
36 |
36 |
7.5 |
28.5 |
3.9 |
12.0 |
24.6 |
12.6 |
39.0 |
|
s |
s |
Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 2006 CanLII 31916 (ON S.C.) |
|
625 |
$ 625 per month spousal support, some arrears rescinded, man claims income of 36 K and wife has income of 39 K |
|
36 |
36 |
10.2 |
25.8 |
3.3 |
0.0 |
22.5 |
22.5 |
|
|
s |
s |
Praill v. Praill, 2004 CanLII 5074 (ON S.C.) |
|
850 |
Spousal support reduced from $ 1200 to $ 850, mans income 36 K |
|
36.5 |
36.5 |
5.4 |
31.1 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
26.7 |
26.7 |
14.5 |
|
s |
s |
Simms v. Simms, 2002 CanLII 2735 (ON S.C.) |
|
405 |
$ 450 per month spousal support, mans income 36.5 and wifes income 14.5 K |
|
|
37.6 |
58.8 |
(21.2) |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Ravka v. Ravka, 2003 CanLII 2341 (ON S.C.) |
|
4900 |
4.9 K spousal support reduced from 5.9 per month, man claims 37.6 K net income |
|
|
38 |
42.0 |
(6.0) |
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
s |
s |
Jeffery v. Jeffery, 2007 CanLII 48987 (ON S.C.) |
|
3500 |
3.5 K spousal support per month, man makes 38 K and wife makes 15.8 K per year |
|
38.5 |
38.5 |
5.7 |
32.8 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
28.0 |
28.0 |
13 |
|
s |
s |
Hance v. Carbone, 2006 CanLII 38234 (ON S.C.) |
|
472 |
$ 472 spousal support for 15 years including retroactive, man earns 38.5 K wife earns 13 K |
|
39 |
39 |
10.1 |
28.9 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
24.9 |
24.9 |
|
|
s |
s |
Reitsma v. Reitsma-Leadsom, 2005 CanLII 47609 (ON S.C.) |
|
840 |
$ 840 per month spousal support, man accused of abuse and convicted of domestic assault, variation denied, man has 39 K income |
|
40 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
34.0 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
29.0 |
29.0 |
14 |
|
s |
s |
Goudie v. Stapleford, 2004 CanLII 20297 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support, man claims no income and is imputed to 40 K, wife makes 14 K per year |
|
40 |
20 |
2.4 |
37.6 |
5.8 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
46 |
|
s |
s |
Galambos-Towers v. Towers, 2005 CanLII 44386 (ON S.C.) |
|
200 |
$ 200 per month spousal support, pays $ 500 spousal support already to another ex wife, imputation of 20 K per year to underearning asset, 122 K property equalization, husbands income 40 K and wifes income 46 K |
|
41 |
41 |
8.6 |
32.4 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
15.0 |
|
s |
s |
Baranowski v. Baranowski, 2007 CanLII 43897 (ON S.C.) |
|
715 |
$ 715 per month spousal support, husband makes 41 K wife makes 15 K per year |
|
42 |
42 |
9.6 |
32.4 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
|
|
s |
y |
Archer v. Archer, 2005 CanLII 12682 (ON C.A.) |
|
800 |
$ 800 per month spousal support, mans income 42 K |
|
44 |
30 |
4.8 |
39.2 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
35.0 |
|
s |
s |
Witz v. Witz, 2004 CanLII 27102 (ON S.C.) |
|
400 |
$ 400 per month spousal support, man claims 30 K and is imputed to 44 K, wife makes 35 K |
|
44 |
44 |
1.8 |
26.0 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
31.0 |
|
s |
s |
Balaban v. Balaban, 2004 CanLII 47801 (ON S.C.)
|
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support reduced from $ 3000, mans income 44 K and wifes income 31 K before support |
|
44.1 |
44.1 |
4.8 |
39.3 |
6.2 |
0.0 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
17.1 |
|
s |
o |
Langille v. Langille, 2004 ONCJ 250 (CanLII) |
|
400 |
$ 400 per month spousal support for 2 years, mans income 44.1K and wifes 17.1 K |
|
45 |
45 |
6.0 |
39.0 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
32.9 |
27.2 |
10.8 |
|
s |
s |
Szabelski v. Szabelski, 2004 CanLII 9412 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support, retroactive award, husband makes 45 K per year and wife makes 10.8 K |
|
45 |
45 |
15.0 |
30.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
25.8 |
25.8 |
6.5 |
|
s |
s |
Lay v. Lay, 2006 CanLII 22143 (ON S.C.) |
|
1250 |
$ 1250 per month spousal support raised slightly, wife is on welfare and man makes 45 K per year |
|
47 |
47 |
6.6 |
40.4 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
34.1 |
34.1 |
16.5 |
|
s |
s |
Arnold v. Arnold, 2004 CanLII 5026 (ON S.C.) |
|
550 |
$ 550 per month spousal support, husbands income 47 K per year, wifes income 16.5 K per year, |
|
47 |
47 |
3.7 |
43.3 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
36.3 |
28.3 |
9.0 |
|
s |
s |
Kirk v. Kirk, 2004 CanLII 5053 (ON S.C.) |
|
305 |
Man retires and spousal support changed to $ 305 per month, 8 K arrears, man makes 47 K and wife makes 9 K |
|
47 |
47 |
20.4 |
26.6 |
3.4 |
9.4 |
23.2 |
13.8 |
|
|
s |
s |
Jardine v. Jardine, 2002 CanLII 2749 (ON S.C.) |
|
1700 |
$ 1700 per month spousal support, 9.4 K retroactive support, mans income 47 K per year |
|
48 |
0.0 |
12.6 |
35.4 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
9.0 |
|
s |
s |
Rilli v. Rilli, 2006 CanLII 34451 (ON S.C.) |
|
1050 |
$ 1050 per month spousal support, man unemployed has 48 K income imputed to him, wife is unemployed and remarried to man who makes 14.4 K per year, wife has 9 K income imputed to her |
|
48 |
48 |
18.0 |
30.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
25.8 |
25.8 |
6.5 |
|
s |
o |
Khan v. Khan, 2005 ONCJ 155 (CanLII |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month in spousal support, separation agreement overturned, man makes 48 K wife on social assistance, |
|
48.6 |
48.6 |
14.4 |
34.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
29.1 |
29.1 |
22.0 |
|
s |
y |
Meiklejohn v. Meiklejohn, 2001 CanLII 21220 (ON C.A.) |
|
1800 |
$ 1800 spousal support changed to $ 1200, man makes 48.6 K, wife makes 22 K |
|
48.7 |
48.7 |
11.4 |
37.3 |
5.7 |
4.0 |
31.6 |
27.4 |
|
|
s |
s |
Gauthier v. Gauthier, 2004 CanLII 39943 (ON S.C.) |
|
950 |
$ 200 per month spousal support on separation agreement overturned to $ 950 per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 48.7 K |
|
49 |
49 |
7.2 |
41.8 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
35.1 |
35.1 |
27 |
|
s |
y |
Bell v. Bailey, 2001 CanLII 11608 (ON C.A.) |
|
600 |
$ 600 per month spousal support, 46 K unjust enrichment claim lowered to 15 K, man made 40 K lump sum spousal support payment to previous wife, man earns 49 K common law wife 27 K |
|
50 |
50 |
4.2 |
45.8 |
8.6 |
12.6 |
37.2 |
24.6 |
15.0 |
|
s |
o |
Jones v. Wilson, 2007 ONCJ 93 (CanLII)
|
|
350 |
$ 350 per month spousal support for common law wife, 3 years retroactive support making 12.6 K arrears, mans income 50 K womans 15 K |
|
50 |
50 |
4.2 |
45.8 |
8.6 |
0.0 |
37.2 |
37.2 |
15.0 |
|
s |
s |
Lachance v. Lachance, 2007 CanLII 29964 (ON S.C.) |
|
350 |
$ 350 per month spousal support varied from $ 1350, husbands income 50 K and wifes income 15 K |
|
50 |
50 |
7.8 |
42.2 |
6.8 |
1.9 |
35.4 |
33.5 |
25.0 |
|
s |
s |
Lynch v. Kerekes, 2004 CanLII 7040 (ON S.C.)
|
|
650 |
$ 650 interim spousal support for common law, wife gets exclusive possession of van and man must make $ 330 payments on it, husband makes 50 K wife makes 25 K |
|
50 |
50 |
10.8 |
39.2 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
|
|
s |
s |
Bondy v. Bondy, 2004 CanLII 14546 (ON S.C.) |
|
900 |
$ 900 per month spousal support, mans income 50 K per year, wife gets equalization payment of 36 K |
|
50 |
50 |
14.4 |
35.6 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
|
|
s |
s |
Leiskau v. Leiskau, 2006 CanLII 25411 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support and guideline child support for 3 child based on imputed income of 50 K |
|
50 |
50 |
12.0 |
38.0 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
32.1 |
32.1 |
6.0 |
|
s |
s |
Minshall v. Minshall, 2003 CanLII 2332 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, man makes 50 K and wife makes 6 K per year |
|
50 |
50 |
18.0 |
32.0 |
4.6 |
0.0 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
5.0 |
|
s |
s |
Perino v. Perino, 2007 CanLII 46919 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month interim spousal support based on an income of 50 K and the wifes income of 5 K |
|
52 |
52 |
10.8 |
41.2 |
6.6 |
0.0 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
5.5 |
|
s |
s |
Gidey v. Abay, 2007 CanLII 40212 (ON S.C.) |
|
900 |
$ 900 spousal support per month, man makes income of 52 K wife makes 5.5 K social assistance |
|
52 |
52 |
15.6 |
36.4 |
5.6 |
0.0 |
30.8 |
30.8 |
4.5 |
|
s |
s |
Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5010 (ON S.C.) |
|
1300 |
$ 1300 per month compensatory spousal support, man earns 52 K wife earns 4.5 K per year |
|
52.3 |
52.3 |
12.0 |
40.3 |
6.4 |
0.0 |
33.9 |
33.9 |
14.4 |
|
s |
s |
Shaw v. Szabo, 2003 CanLII 2240 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support for 27 months then $ 500 for 12 months, wife makes 14.4 K and husband makes 52.3 K per year |
|
53 |
53 |
18.0 |
35.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
10 |
|
s |
s |
Huszarik v. Fairfield, 2004 CanLII 31786 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
4K spousal support reduced to 3 K reduced to 1.5 K, wifes imputed income 10 K and husbands imputed income 53 K per year |
|
53 |
53 |
14.4 |
38.6 |
6.0 |
0.0 |
32.6 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Kemble v. Roy, 2006 CanLII 23937 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support to common law wife, mans income 53 K and wife has no income |
|
53 |
53 |
3.6 |
49.4 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
37.1 |
37.1 |
7.6 |
|
s |
s |
Cherneski v. Cherneski, 2003 CanLII 2081 (ON S.C.) |
|
300 |
$ 300 per month spousal support in agreement upheld, man makes 53 K per year and wife makes 7.6 K |
|
53.9 |
53.9 |
17.5 |
36.4 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
30.9 |
30.9 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Seguin v. Seguin, 2007 CanLII 29970 (ON S.C.) |
|
1462 |
$ 1462 interim spousal support, mans income 53.9 K, wife claims no income |
|
56 |
56 |
9.0 |
47.0 |
8.9 |
7.8 |
38.1 |
30.3 |
30.0 |
|
s |
s |
Cong v. Cong, 2007 CanLII 7994 (ON S.C.) |
|
750 |
$ 750 per month spousal support, child support for 2 children based on income of 56 K,wife makes 30 K per year, 7.8 K in arrears |
|
57 |
57 |
10.0 |
46.0 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
37.3 |
37.3 |
4.4 |
|
s |
s |
Wilson v. Wilson, 2002 CanLII 2683 (ON S.C.)
|
|
835 |
$ 835 per month spousal support, mans income 57 K per year, wifes income 4.4 K |
|
60 |
60 |
10.8 |
49.2 |
12.2 |
19.0 |
37.0 |
18.0 |
32.0 |
|
s |
s |
Braga v. Braga, 2006 CanLII 21776 (ON S.C.) |
|
900 |
$ 2000 per month spousal support reduced to $ 900, arrears, husband makes 60 K and wife makes 32 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
18.0 |
42.0 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
35.3 |
35.3 |
8.0 |
|
s |
s |
Franz v. Wilson, 2005 CanLII 28858 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support, man makes 60 K per year and wife makes 8 K |
|
60 |
60 |
14.4 |
45.6 |
8.6 |
0.0 |
37.0 |
37.0 |
|
|
s |
s |
Stewart v. Stewart, 2007 CanLII 4587 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support reduced from $ 1750, man makes over 60 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
21.6 |
38.4 |
6.0 |
0.0 |
32.4 |
32.4 |
20 |
|
s |
s |
Thomson v. Thomson, 2004 CanLII 7356 (ON S.C.) |
|
1800 |
$ 1800 spousal support per month, man makes 60 K and 20 K per year is imputed to wife |
|
60 |
60 |
6.0 |
54.0 |
13.7 |
40.0 |
40.3 |
(0.3) |
30.1 |
|
s |
s |
Majkut-Giammarco v. Giammarco, 2004 CanLII 34797 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support, vesting order on home to wife for 40 K owing, man makes 60 K and wife makes 30.1 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
7.2 |
52.8 |
13.3 |
0.0 |
39.5 |
39.5 |
37.8 |
|
s |
s |
Townsend v. Townsend, 2004 CanLII 18934 (ON S.C |
|
600 |
$ 600 spousal increased from separation agreement, man makes 60 K and wife makes 37.8 K per year |
|
61 |
61 |
10.8 |
50.2 |
15.6 |
12.0 |
34.6 |
22.6 |
30.0 |
|
s |
s |
Romanski v. Romanska, 2004 CanLII 9784 (ON S.C.) |
|
900 |
$ 900 per month spousal support, 12 K arrears, man earns 61 K wife earns 30 K per year |
|
62 |
62 |
12.4 |
49.6 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
37.6 |
37.6 |
11.8 |
j |
s |
s |
N.S. v. D.A.S., 2003 CanLII 2448 (ON S.C.) |
|
1035 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support but wife must pay $ 165 in child support, mans income 62 K, wifes income 11.8 K per year |
|
62 |
62 |
4.8 |
57.2 |
15.1 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
35.0 |
|
s |
y |
Juvatopolos v. Juvatopolos, 2005 CanLII 35677 (ON C.A.) |
|
400 |
$ 1200 spousal support reduced to $ 400, upheld on appeal, man makes 62 K and wife makes over 35 K |
|
63.5 |
63.5 |
18.0 |
45.5 |
8.6 |
0.0 |
36.9 |
36.9 |
24.0 |
|
s |
s |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2728 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support, wifes income 24 K and mans income 63.5 K per year |
|
64 |
64 |
18.0 |
46.0 |
8.7 |
29.0 |
37.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
s |
s |
Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support, retroactive support, 29 K arrears, mans income 64 K per year, 32 K costs against wife |
|
65 |
47 |
6.0 |
59.0 |
15.3 |
6.5 |
43.7 |
37.2 |
45.0 |
|
s |
s |
Bourgon v. Paquette, 2004 CanLII 5924 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month interim spousal support, settled intention on children reserved for trial, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, man claims 47 K income imputed to 65 K, wife has 45 K income |
|
66 |
66 |
9.0 |
57.0 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
42.4 |
42.4 |
3.5 |
|
s |
s |
Dorthee v. Bekintis, 2004 CanLII 44989 (ON S.C.) |
|
750 |
$ 750 per month for one more year then lump sum spousal support of 9 K for wifes university studies and guideline support for one child, mans income is 66 K and wifes is 3.5 K |
|
69 |
69 |
14.4 |
54.6 |
13.9 |
9.7 |
40.7 |
31.0 |
30.0 |
|
s |
s |
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 35095 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support, separation agreement overturned, retroactive support arrears, 80 K equalization, wife makes 30 K husband makes 69 K per year |
|
70 |
0.0 |
11.9 |
58.1 |
15.0 |
6.5 |
43.1 |
36.6 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2007 CanLII 13703 (ON S.C.) |
|
995 |
$ 995 per month spousal support, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income is 70 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
70 |
58 |
12.0 |
58.0 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
43.0 |
43.0 |
|
|
s |
s |
Straight v. Straight, 2004 CanLII 7046 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, 35 K equalization payment, man declares 58 K imputed to 70 K |
|
70 |
70 |
19.2 |
50.8 |
12.7 |
0.0 |
38.1 |
38.1 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Anshasi v. Ramlawi, 2004 CanLII 9558 (ON S.C.) |
|
1600 |
$ 1600 per month spousal support, short marriage, wife is student and man makes 70 K per year and is in training that costs 50 K per year |
|
70 |
70 |
16.8 |
53.2 |
13.5 |
0.0 |
39.7 |
39.7 |
8.0 |
|
s |
s |
McDonald v. McDonald, 2004 CanLII 21292 (ON S.C.) |
|
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support and guideline child support for 2 children, s.7 expenses, 7 months retroactive, man earns 70 K wife earns 12 K deputed to 8 K |
|
70 |
70 |
30.0 |
40.0 |
6.3 |
8.0 |
33.7 |
25.7 |
5.5 |
|
s |
s |
Arenovich v. Arenovich, 2006 CanLII 17323 (ON S.C.) |
|
2400 |
Spousal support ordered at 2.4 K per month, 8 K arrears, husbands income 70 K per year wifes income 5.5 K |
|
71 |
71 |
24.0 |
47.0 |
8.9 |
1.8 |
38.1 |
36.3 |
16.0 |
|
s |
s |
Rossi v. Rossi, 2005 CanLII 34814 (ON S.C.) |
|
2000 |
2k spousal support, man pays 1.8 K and is absolved 6 K arrears, wifes income 16 K mans income 71 K |
|
71 |
71 |
30.0 |
41.0 |
6.5 |
17.6 |
34.5 |
16.9 |
|
|
s |
s |
Wigle v. Wigle, 2003 CanLII 2359 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month plus annuity that pays 1 K per month, 17.6 K arrears, charging order, man makes 71 K per year |
|
72 |
72 |
3.6 |
68.4 |
18.2 |
0.0 |
50.2 |
50.2 |
10.0 |
|
s |
o |
Hounsell v. Hounsell, 2007 ONCJ 287 (CanLII) |
|
600 |
$ 600 per month spousal support for 1 year, mans income 72 K and wifes income 10 K |
|
72.6 |
72.6 |
38.4 |
34.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
29.1 |
29.1 |
21.0 |
|
s |
s |
Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.) |
|
3200 |
3.2 K spousal support per month, man makes 72.6 K and wife makes 21 K per year |
|
73.5 |
73.5 |
24.0 |
49.5 |
12.3 |
0.0 |
37.2 |
37.2 |
|
|
s |
s |
Witzel v. Witzel, 2004 CanLII 5006 (ON S.C.) |
|
2000 |
$ 1666 per month spousal support increased to 2 K, mans income 73.5 K per year |
|
75 |
75 |
27.6 |
47.4 |
11.7 |
0.0 |
35.7 |
35.7 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Stewart v. Tudorachi, 2006 CanLII 6916 (ON S.C.) |
|
2300 |
2.3 K per month spousal support, man makes 75 K per year, wife is student |
|
75 |
75 |
8.4 |
66.6 |
17.6 |
5.7 |
49.0 |
43.3 |
27.0 |
|
s |
s |
Zeitlhofer v. Boneham, 2004 CanLII 48681 (ON S.C.) |
|
700 |
$ 700 per month spousal support, 1 year retroactive arrears, mans income 75 K wifes income 27 K |
|
75.8 |
75.8 |
12.0 |
63.8 |
16.8 |
5.2 |
47.0 |
41.8 |
|
|
s |
s |
Harnum v. Harnum, 2004 CanLII 47805 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, retroactive arrears 5.2 K, mans income is 75.8 K per year |
|
76 |
76 |
16.8 |
59.2 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
43.9 |
43.9 |
|
|
s |
s |
Tambeau v. Tambeau, 2004 CanLII 10484 (ON S.C.) |
|
1400 |
2.2 K spousal support reduced to 1.4 K because pension was already equalized, man makes 76 K |
|
77 |
77 |
14.4 |
62.6 |
16.4 |
30.0 |
46.2 |
16.2 |
|
|
s |
y |
Bremer v. Bremer, 2005 CanLII 3938 (ON C.A.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support, 30 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 77 K |
|
77.5 |
77.5 |
27.6 |
49.9 |
12.4 |
14.4 |
37.5 |
25.1 |
9 |
|
s |
s |
Wiltshire v. Wiltshire, 2005 CanLII 370 (ON S.C.) |
|
2300 |
2.3 K spousal support per month, arrears, 14.4 K, man makes 77.5 K and wife makes 9 K per year |
|
78.2 |
78.2 |
20.4 |
57.8 |
14.9 |
0.0 |
42.9 |
42.9 |
|
|
s |
s |
Simpson v. Grignon, 2007 CanLII 17038 (ON S.C.) |
|
1700 |
$ 1700 per month spousal support after sale of family home, man earns 78.2 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
21.6 |
54.8 |
14.0 |
9.7 |
40.8 |
31.1 |
16.8 |
|
s |
s |
Soper v. Soper, 2006 CanLII 39573 (ON S.C.) |
|
1800 |
1.8 K spousal support based on income of 80 K, wife makes 16.8 K per year, retroactive arrears |
|
80 |
66.5 |
30.0 |
50.0 |
12.5 |
3.5 |
37.5 |
34.0 |
0.0 |
|
s |
y |
Davignon v. Davignon, 2000 CanLII 5640 (ON C.A.) |
|
2500 |
3.5 K per month spousal support reduced to 2.5 K, wife gets 3.5 K costs, man claims 66.5 K income and is imputed to 80 K, wife is unemployed |
|
80 |
80 |
6.0 |
74.4 |
19.9 |
0.0 |
54.1 |
54.1 |
50 |
|
s |
o |
Wilson v. Marchand, 2007 ONCJ 408 (CanLII)\ |
|
500 |
$ 500 per month spousal support, mans income 80 K womans income 50 K, 4 K costs |
|
82 |
82 |
26.4 |
55.6 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
41.0 |
41.0 |
18.8 |
|
s |
s |
McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 34782 (ON S.C.) |
|
2200 |
2.2 K spousal support per month, man makes 82 K per year and wife makes 18.8 K |
|
83 |
83 |
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
s |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2005 CanLII 2308 (ON S.C.) |
|
900 |
$ 900 per month spousal support plus unstated child support for 2 children, retroactive arrears, mans income 83 K wifes income 35 K |
|
83 |
83 |
16.8 |
66.2 |
17.5 |
0.0 |
48.7 |
48.7 |
5.4 |
|
s |
s |
Lundrigan v. Andrews, 2004 CanLII 34803 (ON S.C.) |
|
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support, common laws found to be spouses for support purposes, man makes 83 K and wife makes 5.4 K |
|
83 |
83 |
18.0 |
65.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
s |
s |
Niemi v. Niemi, 2006 CanLII 24341 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support, wife earns 16.8 K and husband 83 K per year |
|
85 |
39 |
30.0 |
55.0 |
15.5 |
20.0 |
42.5 |
22.5 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Huck v. Huck, 2004 CanLII 22079 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 20 K arrears, 43 K equalization, man claims 39 K income including 24 K loan and is imputed to 85 K, arrears 20.4 K |
|
85 |
85 |
25.2 |
59.8 |
15.5 |
22.0 |
44.3 |
22.3 |
10.0 |
|
s |
s |
Little v. Little, 2002 CanLII 2797 (ON S.C.) |
|
2100 |
2.1 K spousal support per month, retroactive, mans income is 85 K and wifes income is 10 K per year |
|
85.2 |
85.2 |
12.0 |
73.2 |
19.7 |
36.0 |
53.5 |
17.5 |
34.0 |
|
s |
s |
Cossette v. Cossette, 2003 CanLII 2086 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, mans income 85.2 K and wifes income 34 K per year, 673 per month child support, 3 years retroactive spousal support |
|
87.3 |
87.3 |
30.0 |
47.3 |
11.6 |
22.0 |
35.7 |
13.7 |
6.5 |
|
s |
s |
Patan v. Patan, 2004 CanLII 50070 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, man makes 87.3 K and wife is on welfare |
|
90 |
82 |
14.4 |
75.6 |
20.4 |
9.7 |
55.2 |
45.5 |
36.5 |
|
s |
s |
Pestell v. Krystia, 2003 CanLII 2045 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support retroactive, wife earns 36.5 K and husband claims 82 K but must pay at rate of 90 K per year. |
|
90 |
90 |
30.0 |
60.0 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
43.9 |
43.9 |
0.0 |
|
s |
o |
Woodall v. Woodall, 2005 ONCJ 253 (CanLII |
|
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, man makes approximately 90 K per year, wife is unemployed |
|
95.6 |
95.6 |
12.0 |
83.6 |
29.0 |
0.0 |
54.6 |
54.6 |
22.6 |
|
s |
s |
Cornish v. Bacic, 2006 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month interim spousal support, husband has income of 95.6 K and income of 22.6 K is imputed to wife for quitting job |
|
98.9 |
77 |
36.0 |
62.9 |
16.5 |
0.0 |
46.4 |
46.4 |
26.0 |
|
s |
s |
Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2183 (ON S.C.) |
|
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support reduced from 4 K, man claims 77 K income and is imputed to 98.9, wife makes 26 K per year |
|
100 |
100 |
24.0 |
76.0 |
21.7 |
0.0 |
54.3 |
54.3 |
22.0 |
|
s |
s |
Brière v. Saint-Pierre, 2007 CanLII 29338 (ON S.C.) |
|
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, man earns 100 K and wife 22 K |
|
100 |
100 |
12.0 |
78.0 |
22.4 |
0.0 |
55.6 |
55.6 |
14.4 |
|
s |
s |
Lopez v. Tarnocai, 2006 CanLII 44275 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month interim spousal support, man earns 100 K and wife earns 14.4 K per year as an exotic dancer |
|
100 |
9.9 |
30.0 |
70.0 |
18.7 |
0.0 |
51.3 |
51.3 |
11.2 |
|
s |
s |
Fishlock v. Fishlock, 2007 CanLII 12714 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
4 K per month spousal support payments to continue for one more year then reduced to 2.5 K, man retires and claims 9.9 K income but is found to have voluntarily retired so must continue to pay at employment level, wife earns 11.2 K per year |
|
102 |
102 |
36.0 |
66.0 |
17.4 |
22.0 |
48.6 |
26.6 |
7.8 |
|
s |
y |
Desramaux v. Desramaux, 2002 CanLII 45030 (ON C.A.) |
|
3000 |
3 K spousal support per month, child support and retroactive s.7 award, man makes 102 K and wife makes 7.8 K, 10 K costs |
|
103 |
103 |
18.0 |
85.0 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
52.4 |
52.4 |
10.0 |
|
s |
s |
Georgiou v. Georgiou, 2007 CanLII 20777 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support varied from 2 K., husband makes 103 K and wife makes 10 K per year |
|
105 |
105 |
21.6 |
83.4 |
26.0 |
0.0 |
57.4 |
57.4 |
|
|
s |
s |
Verbey v. Verutis, 2006 CanLII 35987 (ON S.C.) |
|
1800 |
$ 1800 per month spousal support, man has 105 K income, wife is on disability |
|
105 |
105 |
32.4 |
72.6 |
20.6 |
5.0 |
52.0 |
47.0 |
30.0 |
|
s |
s |
Foran v. Foran, 2007 CanLII 11712 (ON S.C.D.C.) |
|
2700 |
2.7 K per month spousal support, originally 2.7 K reduced to 1.35 K, but 2.7 K reinstated on appeal and 5 K cost penalty to husband, mans income 105 K and wifes income |
|
106 |
106 |
15.0 |
91.0 |
35.2 |
0.0 |
55.8 |
55.8 |
|
|
s |
s |
Chehowy v. Chehowy, 2004 CanLII 18360 (ON S.C.) |
|
1250 |
$ 1250 per month interim spousal support, mans income 106 K per year |
|
110 |
110 |
24.0 |
86.0 |
33.0 |
0.0 |
53.0 |
53.0 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Echlin v. Echlin, 2005 CanLII 35682 (ON S.C.) |
|
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, both children move in with father and child support discontinued, man has income 0f 110 K and wife has no income |
|
110 |
110 |
42.0 |
68.0 |
18.1 |
37.0 |
49.9 |
12.9 |
21.6 |
|
s |
s |
Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
|
3500 |
3.5 K per month spousal support, 775 K equalization, 37 K arrears, man makes 110 K and wife makes 21.6 K per year |
|
120 |
120 |
14.4 |
105.6 |
41.5 |
0.0 |
64.1 |
64.1 |
35.0 |
|
s |
s |
Van Horne v. Van Horne, 2007 CanLII 16457 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support, man makes 120 K wife is imputed to 35 K per year |
|
120 |
0.0 |
30.0 |
90.0 |
34.7 |
0.0 |
55.3 |
55.3 |
|
|
s |
s |
Bullock v. Bullock, 2004 CanLII 16949 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support indexed since 1995, man takes early retirement and claims no income, imputed to 120 K per year |
|
130 |
130 |
21.6 |
108.4 |
42.7 |
0.0 |
65.7 |
65.7 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Neilson-Sewell v. Neilson-Sewell, 2006 CanLII 21597 (ON S.C.) |
|
1200 |
$ 1200 per month spousal support and $ 1605 per month on mortgage and taxes, man makes 130 K per year and has the children, wife unemployed |
|
139 |
139 |
18.0 |
121.0 |
48.2 |
9.7 |
72.8 |
63.1 |
101.0 |
|
s |
s |
Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.) |
|
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income 139 K wifes income 101 K per year, also an undisclosed child support order with university expenses |
|
150 |
50 |
108.8 |
41.2 |
6.6 |
0.0 |
34.6 |
34.6 |
12.0 |
|
s |
s |
Egan v. Egan, 2007 CanLII 50873 (ON S.C.)
|
|
9000 |
9 K per month temporary interim spousal support, man claims 50 K and is imputed to 150 K, wife claims 12 K per year income |
|
150 |
60 |
42.0 |
108.0 |
42.5 |
0.0 |
65.5 |
65.5 |
|
|
s |
s |
Procyk v. Procyk, 2006 CanLII 18370 (ON S.C.) |
|
3500 |
3.5 K per month spousal support, 70 K and 35 K lump sums already paid, man claims 60 K income but is imputed to 150 K, wife remarries man who makes 142 K per year |
|
155 |
155 |
27.6 |
127.4 |
51.0 |
12.0 |
76.4 |
64.4 |
37.0 |
|
s |
y |
Simpkins v. Simpkins, 2004 CanLII 28909 (ON C.A.) |
|
2300 |
2.3 K per month spousal support,100 K and 15 K lumps sums already ordered, man makes 155 K wife makes 37 K per year, 12 K costs |
|
170 |
101 |
24.0 |
146.0 |
63.1 |
40.0 |
82.9 |
42.9 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.) |
|
2000 |
2K per month spousal support, 40 K arrears, man claims 101 K income and is imputed to 170 K |
|
175 |
43 |
42.0 |
132.0 |
56.6 |
22.0 |
75.4 |
53.4 |
40.0 |
|
s |
s |
Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.) |
|
3500 |
3.5 K per month spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans declared income of 43 K imputed to 175 K, wife earns 40 K per year |
|
175 |
175 |
75 |
100.0 |
39.1 |
30.0 |
60.9 |
30.9 |
20.0 |
|
s |
s |
ogi v. Elguindi, 2005 CanLII 23686 (ON S.C.) |
|
6250 |
485 K equalization payment, 5 K US spousal support, 26 US K lump sum in addition to previous lump sums of 9 and 22 K US, mans income 150 K US, wifes income 20 K CDN per year |
|
184 |
184 |
54.0 |
130.0 |
52.1 |
36.0 |
77.9 |
41.9 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Sitter v. Sitter, 2003 CanLII 2415 (ON S.C.) |
|
4500 |
Interim spousal support lowered from 7 K per month to 4.5 K per month, arrears, man makes 184 K wife quits job |
|
195 |
195 |
60.0 |
135.0 |
58.0 |
0.0 |
77.0 |
77.0 |
24.0 |
|
s |
s |
Colville-Reeves v. Colville-Reeves, 2007 CanLII 50871 (ON S.C.) |
|
5000 |
5 K per month spousal support, man makes 195 K per year and wife makes 24 K |
|
202 |
179 |
60.0 |
142.0 |
61.3 |
0.0 |
80.7 |
80.7 |
5.0 |
|
s |
s |
Johnston v. Johnston, 2004 CanLII 42945 (ON S.C.) |
|
5000 |
5 K spousal support per month, husband must borrow, man claims 179 K income and is imputed to 202 K, wife makes 5 K per year, retroactivity to be determined at trial |
|
240 |
240 |
60.0 |
180.0 |
78.9 |
0.0 |
101.1 |
101.1 |
|
|
s |
y |
Hockey-Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2004 CanLII 34840 (ON C.A.) |
|
5000 |
5 K per month spousal support raised from 3 K, 200 K costs against wife at trial and 15 K costs on appeal, man makes 240 K per year |
|
242 |
202 |
72.0 |
170.0 |
74.3 |
82.3 |
95.7 |
13.3 |
0.0 |
|
s |
y |
Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.) |
|
8000 |
8 K per month spousal support upheld on appeal 52.3 K arrears, income imputed to 242 K from claimed 202 K, wife is unemployed, 30 K total costs |
|
250 |
250 |
84.0 |
166.0 |
72.4 |
16.9 |
93.6 |
76.9 |
50.0 |
|
s |
s |
Poirier v. Poirier, 2005 CanLII 38106 (ON S.C.) |
|
7000 |
7 K per month spousal support, 16.9 K retroactive arrears, 250 K income imputed to husband and 50 K imputed to wife |
|
260 |
260 |
60.0 |
200.0 |
88.2 |
10.0 |
111.8 |
101.8 |
17.5 |
|
s |
s |
Bater v. Bater, 2006 CanLII 22929 (ON S.C.) |
|
5000 |
5 K per month spousal support, 10 K retroactive arrears, man makes 260 K and wife makes 17.5 K per year |
|
311 |
311 |
72.0 |
239.0 |
106.3 |
60.0 |
132.7 |
72.7 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Harding v. Harding, 2006 CanLII 31612 (ON S.C.) |
|
6000 |
6 K per month spousal support, 60 K retroactive arrears, mans income 311 K |
|
315 |
315 |
30.0 |
285.0 |
127.6 |
0.0 |
157.4 |
157.4 |
0.0 |
|
s |
s |
Palinka v Palinka, 2003 CanLII 2195 (ON S.C.) |
|
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support plus a large number of extra expenses including mortgages loans, taxes, and wifes tuition, man makes 315 per year and wife is unemployed |
|
378 |
378 |
66.0 |
312.0 |
140.2 |
8.1 |
171.8 |
163.7 |
25.0 |
|
s |
s |
Gibb v. Gibb, 2004 CanLII 25933 (ON S.C.) |
|
5500 |
5.5 K spousal support per month, 1 month retroactive arrears, man makes 378 K and wife makes 25 K income per year, 3.1 K costs for undefended motion |
|
400 |
0.0 |
39.6 |
360.4 |
162.6 |
22.0 |
197.8 |
175.8 |
60 |
|
s |
s |
Gainer v. Gainer, 2006 CanLII 12969 (ON S.C.) |
|
3300 |
3.3 K per month spousal support, 22 K arrears, wife seeks 475 K for damages, both husband and wife are unemployed and court imputes 400 K to husband and 60 K to wife |
|
663 |
663 |
351.0 |
312.0 |
140.2 |
20.0 |
171.8 |
151.8 |
|
|
s |
y |
MacDougall v. MacDougall, 2005 CanLII 44676 (ON C.A.) |
|
29250 |
Spousal support of 351 K per year even if income decreases, mans income has not fallen below 663 K, 20 K costs |
|
1284 |
30 |
420.0 |
864.0 |
396.3 |
42.0 |
467.7 |
425.7 |
|
|
s |
y |
Kushnir v. Lowry, 2005 CanLII 20713 (ON C.A.) |
|
35000 |
7 million equalization, 35 K per month retroative spousal support, man declares 30 K income and court finds he spent 107 monthly, 20 K costs |
|
1382 |
1382 |
324.0 |
1058.0 |
486.4 |
77.5 |
571.6 |
494.1 |
80.0 |
|
s |
s |
Martin v. Martin, 2004 CanLII 48712 (ON S.C.) |
|
27000 |
Indefinite spousal support of 27 K per month, 3 months retroactive during which he paid 1.25 K per month, mans income will be 1382 K after strike and wifes income 80 K per year |
|
2500 |
2500 |
133.2 |
1866.8 |
861.7 |
500.0 |
1004.3 |
504.3 |
50.0 |
|
s |
y |
Tauber v. Tauber, 2003 CanLII 8918 (ON C.A.)
|
|
11100 |
500,000 K lump sum for spousal, 11.1 K child support per month |
|
119 |
119 |
30.3 |
88.7 |
36.9 |
0.0 |
51.8 |
51.8 |
|
j |
b |
s |
Nichols v. Nichols, 2005 CanLII 3473 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
2000 |
2 K spousal support per month, 0.4 K offset child support per month and s.7 expenses, father makes 119 K per year |
|
186 |
186 |
85.2 |
100.8 |
57.2 |
0.0 |
43.6 |
43.6 |
|
j |
b |
y |
Miglin v. Miglin, 2001 CanLII 8525 (ON C.A.)
|
2700 |
4400 |
4.4 K spousal support per month, 2.7 K child support per month, oldest child living with father, man earns 186 K per year |
|
25 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
19.0 |
3.1 |
0.0 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Moreau v. Moreau, 2004 CanLII 822 (ON S.C.) |
599 |
|
$ 483 child support plus 116 per month daycare expense, man is unemployed imputed to 25 K, joint custody |
|
29.1 |
29.1 |
5.2 |
23.9 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
19.9 |
16.9 |
|
j |
c |
o |
D.G. v. K.G., 2005 ONCJ 235 (CanLII) |
435 |
|
$ 435 per month child support, joint custody, 3 K arrears, mans income 29.1 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
|
j |
c |
o |
Martin v. Mollison, 2005 ONCJ 503 (CanLII) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support based on an income of 30 K, joint custody wife was on welfare |
|
30 |
30 |
4.7 |
25.3 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Sellick v. Bollert, 2004 CanLII 18894 (ON S.C.) |
266 |
|
$ 266 per month child support and s.7 expenses, joint custody, mans income 30 K per year |
|
31 |
31 |
3.0 |
28.0 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Wheeldon v. Wheeldon, 2003 CanLII 2398 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 child support, $ 1 spousal support, joint custody, both parents had been on welfare, man declared bankruptcy, man has income of 31 K imputed |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.9 |
23.9 |
|
j |
c |
s |
L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.) |
486 |
|
$ 486 offset child support per month and $ 210 s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 35 K, child support rises to $ 681 when child residing with him graduates |
|
40 |
0.0 |
6.8 |
33.2 |
6.3 |
8.0 |
26.9 |
18.9 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Wright v. Wright, 2004 CanLII 19944 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support, joint custody, 8 K arrears, man unemployed imputed to 40 K per year |
|
48 |
48 |
6.0 |
42.0 |
11.8 |
7.7 |
30.2 |
22.5 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Sgro v. Sgro, 2003 CanLII 2454 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 child support, must pay $ 1287 in mortgage payments and wife has exclusive possession of home, joint custody, mans income 48 K |
|
50 |
50 |
8.5 |
41.5 |
12.5 |
6.8 |
29.0 |
22.2 |
|
j |
c |
s |
Del Net v. Benger, 2003 CanLII 2096 (ON S.C.) |
705 |
|
$ 705 per month offset child support, joint custody though primary residence with father, father makes 50 K per year, 6.8 K costs to wife |
|
58 |
58 |
0.8 |
57.2 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
42.2 |
42.2 |
|
j |
c |
o |
Wise v. Wise, 2006 ONCJ 124 (CanLII)
|
70 |
|
$ 70 per month offset child support including s.7 expenses, man makes 58 K per year |
|
403 |
403 |
89.0 |
314.0 |
181.4 |
0.0 |
132.6 |
132.6 |
|
j |
c |
s |
McLean v. Vassel, 2004 CanLII 4031 (ON S.C.) |
7416 |
|
7 K per month child support and $ 416 in travel expense, man lives in Turks and Caicos and has custody of 1 child, wife has other 2 children, man claims his income has dropped severely but must continue paying at level of separation agreement |
|
240 |
240 |
62.4 |
177.6 |
92.8 |
0.0 |
84.8 |
84.8 |
0.0 |
j |
b |
s |
Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 4493 (ON S.C.) |
2700 |
2500 |
2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month, man makes 240 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
642 |
642 |
190.0 |
452.0 |
225.6 |
0.0 |
226.4 |
226.4 |
0.0 |
j |
b |
s |
Stafford v. Rebane, 2004 CanLII 34080 (ON S.C.) |
3832 |
12000 |
12 K per month offset spousal support per month, children live with father and he has 3832 per month s.7 expenses, man makes 642 per year and wife is unemployed |
|
53.6 |
53.6 |
5.9 |
47.7 |
13.6 |
0.0 |
34.1 |
34.1 |
0.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Somerset v. Somerset, 2004 CanLII 16881 (ON S.C.) |
490 |
|
$ 440 per month and $ 50 s.7 expenses, parallel parenting, mobility and hardship and access claims, mans income 53.6 K per year |
|
90 |
90 |
21.9 |
68.1 |
25.1 |
0.0 |
43.0 |
43.0 |
6 |
j |
b |
s |
Baker v. Baker, 2005 CanLII 44409 (ON S.C.) |
1078 |
750 |
$ 1078 per month child support, $ 1225 spousal support reduced to $ 750, mans income 90 K per year, wifes 6 K, 4 children, 2 have principle residence with father |
|
45 |
45 |
7.2 |
37.8 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
11.2 |
j |
c |
s |
Galbraith v. Galbraith, 2007 CanLII 24080 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
|
$ 600 per month offset spousal support, husband has both children, husbands income 45 K and wife has income of 11.2 K per year |
|
46 |
46 |
11.7 |
34.3 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
25.6 |
25.6 |
15.5 |
j |
c |
o |
Easton v. McAvoy, 2005 ONCJ 319 (CanLII |
976 |
|
$ 851 per month child support and $ 1500 per year s.7 expenses, joint custody, childs biological father added as a party, mans income 46 K and wifes 15.5 K per year |
|
46.7 |
46.7 |
8.4 |
38.3 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
15.6 |
j |
b |
o |
Crozier v. Crozier, 2006 ONCJ 177 (CanLII) |
300 |
400 |
$ 400 spousal support for 16 months and $ 300 per month offset child support, mans income 46.7 K wifes income 15.6 K |
|
40 |
40 |
2.5 |
37.5 |
6.3 |
1.7 |
31.2 |
29.5 |
18.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Koester v. Koester, 2003 CanLII 2150 (ON S.C.) |
205 |
|
Offsetting child support payment of $ 205, 1.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 40 K and wife makes 18 K per year |
|
47 |
0.0 |
3.0 |
44.0 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
35.1 |
35.1 |
19.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Danis v. Danis, 2004 CanLII 8245 (ON S.C.) |
253 |
|
$ 253 per month offset child support, wife has income of 19 K and child support of $ 522 per month ordered from another spouse, husband had 47 K income but was laid off |
|
32 |
32 |
4.1 |
27.9 |
4.6 |
0.0 |
23.2 |
23.2 |
22.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Robblee v. Reid, 2003 CanLII 2333 (ON S.C.) |
345 |
|
$ 345 interim child support, woman has child less than 40 % of the time and her income does not offset, man has net income of 32 K and wife has net income of 22 K ( gross incomes of 40 and 26 respectively ) |
|
145 |
145 |
24.0 |
121.0 |
60.6 |
0.0 |
60.4 |
60.4 |
22.7 |
j |
b |
s |
Lewis v. Lewis, 2003 CanLII 1972 (ON S.C.) |
1550 |
450 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 1450 child support varied to $ 450 spousal support and $ 1550 child support, joint custody, man makes 144.9 K per year and wife makes 22.7 K |
|
80 |
80 |
4.8 |
75.2 |
23.1 |
5.7 |
52.1 |
46.4 |
25.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Lebrun v. Lebrun, 2006 CanLII 37962 (ON S.C.) |
279 |
|
$ 279 per month offset child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive s.7 arrears, wife makes 25 K and husbands income 80 K |
|
36 |
36 |
5.0 |
31.0 |
5.5 |
9.5 |
25.5 |
16.0 |
28.0 |
j |
c |
o |
C.B. v. D.B., 2004 ONCJ 236 (CanLII) |
416 |
|
$ 416 per month offset child support, one child lives with father, 9.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 36 K and wifes income 28 K |
|
94.5 |
94.5 |
18.1 |
76.4 |
36.7 |
0.0 |
39.4 |
39.4 |
34.0 |
j |
c |
o |
Michelin v. Donnelly, 2005 ONCJ 115 (CanLII) |
1177 |
|
$ 1177 per month child support and 50 % s.7 expenses, joint custody, man makes 94.5 K and woman makes 34 K, man has 2 other children from 2 different marriages he pays support for. |
|
65 |
65 |
4.3 |
60.7 |
17.1 |
0.0 |
43.6 |
43.6 |
35.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.) |
361 |
|
$ 361 per month in offset split, retroactive support 3.5 K, mans income 65 K, woman loses job and is imputed at 35 K |
|
90 |
90 |
2.5 |
87.5 |
34.7 |
80.0 |
52.8 |
(27.2) |
37.0 |
j |
c |
o |
Opach v. Lesnik, 2006 ONCJ 312 (CanLII) |
206 |
|
$ 206 per month offset support, mother has one child and father has the other, 70 K in arrears, 10 K cost penalty, pleadings struck and variation dismissed, man earns 90 K per year and wife earns 37 K |
|
82.4 |
82.4 |
14.3 |
68.1 |
25.6 |
0.0 |
42.5 |
42.5 |
39.4 |
j |
c |
s |
Howarth v. Howarth, 2003 CanLII 1956 (ON S.C.) |
1193 |
|
$ 493 offset child support plus $ 700 s,7 expenses, no interim spousal support, mans income 82.4 K per year and wifes income 39.4 K |
|
50 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
41.4 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
32.5 |
32.5 |
40.0 |
j |
b |
s |
J.B. v. A.B., 2006 CanLII 12294 (ON S.C.) |
453 |
260 |
$ 453 offset child support, $ 260 spousal support per month, joint custody, recklessly lost job and income imputed to 50 K, wife earns 25 K and is imputed to 40 K |
|
63 |
63 |
12.9 |
50.1 |
14.6 |
7.5 |
35.5 |
28.0 |
40.0 |
j |
b |
s |
Lavigne v. MacCaskill, 2003 CanLII 2014 (ON S.C.) |
572 |
500 |
Offset child support of $ 572 per month and $ 500 per month spousal support, 7.5 K arrears, man makes 63 K wife makes 40 K |
|
64.1 |
56.8 |
10.5 |
53.6 |
15.1 |
0.0 |
37.9 |
37.9 |
40.0 |
j |
b |
s |
Bemrose v. Fetter, 2003 CanLII 2406 (ON S.C.) |
299 |
450 |
$ 299 per month offset child support and 63 % s.7 expense, $ 450 spousal support, wifes income 40 K imputed from claimed 34 K, priest with honorariums imputed 7.3 K to 64.1 K per year |
|
250 |
250 |
46.8 |
203.2 |
97.5 |
11.7 |
105.7 |
94.0 |
41.5 |
j |
b |
s |
Bourget v. Fradkin, 2005 CanLII 24250 (ON S.C.) |
1400 |
2500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 1.4 K offset child support, 3 months retroactive, man makes 250 K per year and wife makes 41.5 K |
|
38 |
20 |
3.9 |
34.1 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
42.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, 2003 CanLII 2145 (ON S.C.)
|
329 |
|
$ 329 per month child support, joint custody, mans claim for spousal support denied, wife earns 42 K and husband claims 20 K and is imputed to 38 K, false criminal allegations by wife, joint custody |
|
233 |
233 |
37.2 |
195.8 |
96.8 |
0.0 |
99.0 |
99.0 |
45.5 |
j |
b |
s |
Zanewycz v. Zanewycz, 2007 CanLII 38584 (ON S.C.) |
1900 |
1200 |
1.9 K per month offset interim child support and 1.2 K per month spousal support, man makes 233 K and wife makes 45.5 K per year |
|
135 |
135 |
40.8 |
94.2 |
45.6 |
8.0 |
48.6 |
40.6 |
48.5 |
j |
b |
s |
Jeffrey v. Jeffrey, 2007 CanLII 13361 (ON S.C.) |
781 |
2500 |
$ 2500 per month spousal support and $ 781 per month offset child support, and s.7 expenses, and 8 K lump sum for bonuses, man makes 135 K and wife makes 48.5 K per year |
|
51 |
51 |
3.1 |
47.9 |
12.8 |
0.0 |
35.1 |
35.1 |
49.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Froom v. Froom, 2004 CanLII 49972 (ON S.C.) |
261 |
|
$ 31 per month offset child support and $ 230 in s.7 expenses, mans income 51 K wifes income 49 K |
|
150 |
150 |
12.2 |
137.8 |
65.0 |
0.0 |
72.8 |
72.8 |
50.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Coghill v. Coghill, 2006 CanLII 21778 (ON S.C.) |
1015 |
|
$ 715 to be paid to daughter in school, father must pay mother $ 300 to maintain home for child, mother must pay child $ 238 directly, mans income 150 K and wifes income 50 K |
|
58 |
58 |
4.8 |
53.2 |
15.0 |
17.7 |
38.2 |
20.5 |
51.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 814 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 child support reduced from $ 950 per month, one child is joint and the other isn’t, arrears, s.7 and retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 58 K woman makes 51 K |
|
79 |
79 |
2.5 |
76.5 |
22.8 |
0.0 |
53.7 |
53.7 |
54.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Facey v. Buckland, 2006 CanLII 37260 (ON S.C.) |
204 |
|
$ 204 per month offset child support, 1.5 K arrears, split custody, mans income is 79 K wifes income is 54 K |
|
72 |
72 |
1.0 |
71.0 |
19.3 |
5.7 |
51.7 |
46.0 |
58.0 |
j |
c |
o |
Levien v. Andrews, 2006 ONCJ 12 (CanLII)
|
90 |
|
$ 90 per month offset child support, retroactive arrears, man makes 72 K and wife is imputed to 58 K per year |
|
185 |
70 |
18.8 |
166.2 |
81.2 |
0.0 |
85.0 |
|
68.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Starr v. Starr, 2004 CanLII 18698 (ON S.C.) |
1566 |
|
$ 1566 child support after offset, man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 185 K, wife makes 68 K per year |
|
105 |
105 |
10.4 |
94.6 |
41.2 |
5.0 |
53.4 |
48.5 |
75.0 |
j |
c |
s |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.) |
863 |
|
$ 738 per month child support and $ 125 s.7 expenses and 5 K retroactive lump sum, shared custody, man has 105 K income and wife has 75 K income, joint custody of 1 of 3 children |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
j |
c |
s |
Metter v. Solomon, 2005 CanLII 6378 (ON S.C.) |
296 |
|
$ 296 per month after offset, split custody with primary residence with father, 8 K arrears and s.7 expenses |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
j |
c |
y |
Wylie v. Leclair, 2003 CanLII 49737 (ON C.A.) |
272 |
|
$ 272 per month child support after set off, 70 K unjust enrichment reduced from 150 K, 10 K cost penalty |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
j |
b |
s |
Attia v. Garanna, 2007 CanLII 49180 (ON S.C.) |
944 |
800 |
Husband has custody, wife takes children to egypt and makes motion for custody, motion stayed and man ordered to pay $ 944 per month child support and $ 800 spousal support when she returns children |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
j |
c |
s |
Michelin v. Donnelly, 2005 ONCJ 115 (CanLII) |
1177 |
|
$ $1177 in child support, joint custody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
80 |
12.0 |
68.0 |
18.1 |
6.0 |
49.9 |
43.9 |
0.0 |
j |
s |
s |
Ghahrai v. Mohammad, 2006 CanLII 39031 (ON S.C.) |
|
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support, lump sum spousal payment of 6 K, man has children but wife does not pay child support, mans income 80 K and wife is in school |
|
80 |
80 |
15.5 |
64.5 |
15.5 |
0.0 |
49.0 |
49.0 |
13.8 |
j |
s |
s |
Zelko v. Zelko, 2005 CanLII 4102 (ON S.C.) |
|
1290 |
$ 1500 spousal support, wife pays $ 210 child support for 2 children, man earns 80 K and wife earns 13.8 K per year |
|
80 |
70 |
10.6 |
69.4 |
19.0 |
0.0 |
50.4 |
50.4 |
15.0 |
j |
s |
s |
Reidy v. Reidy, 2005 CanLII 44401 (ON S.C.) |
125 |
759 |
$ 1149 per month in spousal support partially offset by wife paying $ 390 per month in child support, s.7 expenses, man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 80 K, wife has 15 K income |
|
48 |
48 |
7.2 |
40.8 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
34.3 |
34.3 |
17.9 |
j |
s |
s |
Yeo v. Yeo, 2003 CanLII 2276 (ON S.C.) |
|
600 |
$ 600 spousal support to wife, father has child but no child support ordered, wife loses job and is imputed at former rate of 17.9 K, husband makes 48 K per year |
|
50 |
50 |
9.6 |
40.4 |
6.4 |
0.0 |
34.0 |
34.0 |
0.0 |
j |
s |
s |
Santiago Araya v. Gaete, 2005 CanLII 4581 (ON S.C.) |
|
800 |
$ 800 per month interim spousal support, man earns 50 K, woman claims she can’t work, child lives with man |
|
54.9 |
54.9 |
13.9 |
41.0 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
17 |
j |
s |
s |
Myllymaa v. Myllymaa, 2004 CanLII 5066 (ON S.C.) |
|
1161 |
$ 1500 spousal support however wife pays husband $ 339 child support, wifes income 17 K and husbands income 54.9 K per year |
|
64 |
64 |
15.6 |
48.4 |
12.0 |
0.0 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
|
j |
s |
s |
Stajkowski v. Stajkowski, 2004 CanLII 26185 (ON S.C.) |
|
1300 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support, husband has children but no child support, husband claims 64 K per year income |
|
72 |
72 |
0.7 |
71.3 |
19.1 |
0.0 |
52.2 |
52.2 |
36 |
j |
s |
s |
Catalan v. Catalan, 2003 CanLII 2079 (ON S.C.) |
|
55 |
$ 55 per month interim offset spousal support, man has interim custody of child, man earns 72 K wife earns 36 K |
|
75.7 |
75.7 |
13.2 |
62.5 |
16.4 |
40.0 |
46.1 |
6.1 |
25.5 |
j |
s |
s |
Eagle v. Eagle, 2004 CanLII 2561 (ON S.C.) |
|
1100 |
$ 1100 per month net spousal support reduced from $ 2500, man has both children, 20 K arrears, 20 K retroactive arrears , mans income 75.7 K wifes income 25.5 K per year |
|
107 |
107 |
33.6 |
73.4 |
20.9 |
0.0 |
52,5 |
52.5 |
14.8 |
j |
s |
s |
Jagodich v. Jagodich, 2003 CanLII 2010 (ON S.C.) |
|
2800 |
2.8 K per month offset spousal support, father has custody of children, man makes 113 K and wife makes 14.8 K per year |
|
28 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
23.4 |
2.8 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
14.6 |
|
s |
s |
Eberl v. Eberl, 2004 CanLII 10617 (ON S.C.) |
|
386 |
$ 500 spousal support, father has child and wife must pay $ 114 child support so total support payable to wife $ 386 per month, man unemployed and income imputed to 28 K, wifes income 14.6 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
7.7 |
52.3 |
8.8 |
0.0 |
43.5 |
43.5 |
|
o |
b |
s |
B. L. v. B. A. A., 2005 CanLII 2721 (ON S.C.) |
340 |
300 |
$ 300 interim spousal support and $ 340 child support, common law relationship, allegations of sexual abuse, natural father pays 468 for other children in addition so payments reduced from table $ 808, mans income 60 K |
|
115 |
99 |
15.6 |
99.4 |
41.9 |
0.0 |
57.5 |
57.5 |
50.0 |
o |
b |
s |
Savage v. Agnello, 2002 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
700 |
$ 600 interim child support and $ 700 spousal support, father makes $ 300 payments on other items for family also, man claims income 99 K and is imputed to 115 K, wifes income 50 K per year, biological father pays $ 908 per month child support also |
|
60 |
60 |
2.8 |
57.2 |
15.6 |
93.0 |
41.6 |
(51.4) |
125.0 |
o |
c |
s |
Demarchi v. Selwyn, 2002 CanLII 2722 (ON S.C.) |
234 |
|
Lump sum of 93 K, $ 234 per month child support partially offset by lump, fathers income 60 K and mothers 125 K |