Superior Court Cost Penalties
Aug 2007
Contents
page
Introduction 1
Cost Decision Outcomes 1
Cost Penalties 1
Representation 6
Sex of Judge 9
Conclusions 10
Appendixes 11
Introduction
This study examines 404 cases where rulings on cost penalties were made in divorce related cases by the Ontario Superior Court. All cases between husband and wife where a monetary figure is given were included. In a small number of cases cost penalties were given out for several previous hearings, so the number of cases does not correspond with the number of wins. Some cases were missing information so could not be used in particular segments. The cases used for this study have been taken from the first half of the Canlii database. 10,500 cases were available on Canlii under the search term costs . Most cases used in this study cames from the first third of the database. Subsequent listings typically only requested cost submissions from the parties.
Cost Decision Outcomes
|
Total Wins |
Female Wins |
% Female Wins |
Male Wins |
% Male Wins |
Divided Success |
% Divided Success |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
264 |
64.5 |
87 |
21.3 |
58 |
14.1 |
It can be concluded that females win (64.5/21.3) 3 times for every time a man wins, as determined by judicial decisions on costs.
Discrimination Index = % Female Wins - % Male Wins
= 64.5 21.3
= 43.2 %
Cost Penalties
Cost Penalties Against Women = (13.7 + 15 + 10 + 3.5 + 4 + 2.5 + 3 + 12 + 5 + 8.5 + 14 + 5.8 + 18 + 9.5 + . 1 + 2 + 22.5 + 3.5 + 89 + 9.5 + 2.4 + 16 + 3 + 35 + 16 + 60 + 6.4 + 31 + . 13.6 + 45.5 + 32 + 3 + 2 + 32 + 1.5 + 0.1 + 200 + 1.5 + 2 + 7.5 + 40.7 + . .. 47 + 1.5 + 28 + 5 + 82.8 + 10 + 2 + 67 + 3.5 + 73.4 + 27.9 + 20 + 15 + 3 . + 12 + 15 + 0.8 + 2.7 + 2.7 + 211 + 7.5 + 5.8 + 5 + 0.6 + 10 + 20 + 6 + 7 . + 0.3 + 0.8 + 48 + 4.3 + 3 + 4.8 + 32.5 + 5.5 + 1.5 + 8 + 4.2 + 0.6 + 1.5 + . 252.9 + 3 + 6.3 + 10 + 0.2 ) / 87
= 1883.1 / 87
= 21.6 K
Cost Penalties Against Men = ( 9.4 + 10 + 25.5 + 9 + 20 + 11.1 + 4.5 + 3 + 4 + 22.5 + 3.8 + 12 + 5 + 2,225 . + 1.2 + 3 + 10.9 + 7.2 + 3.5 + 12 + 4 + 8 + 18 + 2 + 9.6 + 24.4 + 4.7 + 8 + . .. 3.5 + 10 + 15 + 40 + 36.9 + 1 + 9 + 4 + 40 + 4.5 + 10 + 2.5 + 5.2 + 6 + 2.1 . .. + 99 + 20 + 2.5 + 13.5 + 15 + 85.8 + 2.5 + 17 + 14.1 + 1.4 + 16 + 10 + 1.5 + . 70 + 5 + 2 + 25 + 10 + 6.5 + 25 + 95 + 4.3 + 49 + 1.8 + 29.6 + 12.1 + 7.5 + . .. 144.6 + 42.8 + 28.7 + 9.7 + 11 + 7 + 4 + 84.9 + 997.7 + 19.5 + 3 + 16.5 + .. .. 1.5 + 9 + 1.5 + 3.5 + 7 + 183.8 + 9.2 + 9.5 + 34 + 8.2 + 19.5 + 15 + 10.5 + .. .. 10 + 12 + 25 + 3.5 + 35 + 48 + 38 + 0.9 + 14 + 15 + 1.5 + 1.5 + 2.1 + 85 + 2 .. + 1.8 + 10 + 36 + 23 + 5 + 4 + 15 + 15 + 2.3 + 12 .4 + 4.5 + 7 + 12 + 10.3 + 10 + 6.6 + 45.9 + 10 + 20 + 14.5 + 8.5 + 5 + 1 + 2.1 + 6.9 + 2 + 15 + 3.4 + 72 + 22 + 6.5 + 1.5 + 3.5 + 2.5 + 5 + 10 + 9 + 5.5 + 8 + 1.2 + 17.9 + 12.6 + .. 17.9 + 15 + 5.9 + 4.6 + 13.4 + 4.5 + 6.5 + 150 + 6.6 + 2.6 + 3.8 + 5.9 + 112.4 + 0.7 + 8.9 + 0.8 + 58.7 + 7.5 + 7.4 + 34.3 + 2.1 + 9.4 + 0.3 + 62 + . 4.5 + 7.8 + 14.3 + 15 + 4.7 + 89.6 + 12.4 + 6 + 6 + 44.7 + 10 + 34 + 31.5 + .. 0.7 + 6 + 3.1 + 103.4 + 8.7 + 12 + 31 + 33.8 + 3.5 + 35 + 1.3 + 75 + 6.5 + 7.5 + 3.8 + 18 + 10.6 + 20 + 16 + 16.2 + 12 + 15.5 + 320 + 7.3 + 3 + 39.5 + .. 3 + 31.4 + 8.5 + 3.5 + 8.5 + 5 + 8.5 + 3.8 + 4 + 1 + 10 + 49 + 0.5 + 5.7 + 4 + 22.5 + 5.8 + 6.4 + 50.7 + 5 + 3 + 75 + 10.8 + 117 + 60.9 + 7 + 6 + 2.3 + 2 .. + 20.6 + 5 + 15.8 + 3.3 + 48.6 + 8 + 90 + 12.8 + 4.3 + 15.7 + 4.7 + 3.5 + . 15.7 + 4.5 + 8.5 + 7.4 + 30 + 4.1 + 36.4 + 6.4 ) / 264
= 8329.9 / 264
= 31.6 K
It can be concluded that on average females pay 31.6 % lower cost penalties than men
For the purposes of this portion of the study divorce actions mean fully contested divorces that culminated in a trial of the issues. Cases where the parties came to agreement and only minor deliberation of a single issue remained, have been excluded. Costs of previous interim hearings may be included in the total penalty. 82 cases where a male had to pay a females lawyers costs could be found, and there were 28 cases where a female had to pay for a males lawyer. The results are as follows
Cost Penalties Against Women = ( 10 + 32.5 + 8 + 252.9 + 10 + 12 + 8.5 + 22 + 89 + 9 + 60 + 13.6 + 45.5 + . 32 + 200 + 40.7 + 7.5 + 49.6 + 82.8 + 27.5 + 67 + 54.6 + 15 + 211 ) / 28
= 1287 / 28
= 45.9 K
Cost Penalties Against Men = ( 9 + 20 + 4.5 + 22.5 + 12 + 2250 + 24.4 + 15 + 36.9 + 40 + 10 + 20 + 85.8 + 70 + 25 + 77 + 95 + 49 + 29.6 + 7.5 + 144.6 + 42 + 28.7 + 9.7 + 11 + 84.9 + 997 + 19.5 + 7 + 183.8 + 25 + 35 + 48 + 38 + 85 + 36 + 15 + 12 + 20.3 + .. 14.5 + 2 + 22 + 9 + 17.9 + 12.6 + 17.9 + 15 + 5.9 + 150 + 7.5 + 34.3 + 62 + . 14.3 + 89.6 + 90 + 44.7 + 34 + 31.5 + 103 + 12 + 31 + 33.8 + 75 + 3.8 + 18.0 + 10.6 + 7.3 + 39.5 + 31.4 + 8.5 + 5 + 49 + 5.7 + 6.4 + 50.7 + 10.8 + 75 + 20.6 + 5 + 3.3 + 48.6 + 8.5 + 30 + 34.6 ) / 82
= 6290.8 / 82
= 76.7 K
It can be concluded that on average females pay 40.2 % lower cost penalties on overall divorce actions than men
80 cases could be found that were clearly interim motion. In 53 men had to pay the costs of their spouses lawyer and in 27 women had to pay costs. The results are as follows.
Cost Penalties Against Women = (5.8 + 0.65 + 0.3 + 0.75 + 1.5 + 0.15 + 15 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 3.5 + 3 + 2 + 1.5+ 1.5 + 5.0 + 3.5 + 9.3 + 9.3 + 9.3 + 0.8 ) / 27
= 123.23 / 27
= 4.5 K
Cost Penalties Against Men = ( 3.8 + 1.2 + 3.5 + 12 2.5 + 5.5 + 4.7 + 3.5 + 5.2 + 6 + 2.1 + 93.4 + 15 + 2.5 + 1.4 + 5.3 + 5.3 + 5.3 + 5 + 2 + 1.8 + 7 + 3 + 1.5 + 9.2 + 1.5 + 2.1 + 2.0 + 7.6 + 7.6 + 7.6 + 5 + 2.3 + 10 + 6.9 + 6.5 + 2.5 + 5.5 + 4.6 + 13.4 + 4.5 + . 6.6 + 5.9 + 4.7 + 1.3 + 7.5 + 15.5 + 3 + 3 + 3.8 + 0.5 + 5 + 3 + 0.75 + 3 + . 2.3 + 2.0 ) / 53
= 361.75 / 53
= 6.8 K
It can be concluded that on average females pay 33.8 % lower interim cost penalties than men
53 cases could be found that were post divorce support variations. In 42 men had to pay the costs of their spouses lawyer and in 11 women had to pay costs. The results are as follows.
Cost Penalties Against Women = ( 5 + 4.8 + 5.5 + 3.5 + 4 + 2.5 + 9 + 16 + 32 + 6.4 + 5.1 ) / 11
= 93.8 / 11
= 8.5 K
Cost Penalties Against Men = ( 11.1 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 18 + 10 + 9.6 + 40 + 1 + 2.5 + 13.5 + 17 + 14.1 + 25 + 9.5 + 8.2 + 12 + 12.4 + 7 + 6.6 + 45.9 + 15 + 72 + 1.5 + 3.5 + 8 + 3.8 + 7.4 + 0.25 + 15.0 + 12.4 + 6 + 0.75 + 3.1 + 8.7 + 6.5 + 4 + 5.8 + 4.3 + 15.7 + . 4.1 + 6.4 ) / 42
= 479.6 / 42
= 11.4 K
It can be concluded that on average females pay 25.4 % lower cost penalties on post divorce support variations than men
Representation
Analysis of representation omits cases of divided success and focuses on cases where the judge has made a decision who the won and who lost. In 5 cases where a male won the sex of his lawyer could not be determined. In 17 cases where a female won the sex of her lawyer could not be determined. Those cases have also been omitted.
|
|
Total Cases |
Male Lawyer |
% Male Lawyer |
Female Lawyer |
% Female Lawyer |
Self Represented |
% Self Represented |
|
Male Litigants |
334 |
207 |
62.0 |
56 |
16.8 |
70 |
21.2 |
|
Female Litigants |
334 |
192 |
57.5 |
125 |
37.4 |
16 |
5.1 |
Outcomes by Representation
|
|
Total Cases |
Male Lawyer |
% Male Lawyer |
Female Lawyer |
% Female Lawyer |
Self Represented |
% Self Represented |
|
Male Wins |
84 |
57 |
67.8 |
25 |
29.7 |
2 |
2.4 |
|
Male Losses |
250 |
151 |
60.4 |
31 |
12.4 |
68 |
27.2 |
|
Female Wins |
250 |
141 |
56.4 |
105 |
42.0 |
4 |
1.6 |
|
Female Losses |
84 |
51 |
60.7 |
20 |
23.8 |
13 |
15.4 |
Male Representation
|
|
Total Cases |
Wins |
% Wins |
|
Male Lawyer |
207 |
57 |
27.5 |
|
Female Lawyer |
56 |
25 |
44.6 |
It can be concluded that a male has a ( 44.6 27.5 ) 17.1 % greater chance of winning if he hires a female lawyer than if he hires a male lawyer for family actions in Superior Court
Female Representation
|
|
Total Cases |
Wins |
% Wins |
|
Male Lawyer |
192 |
141 |
73.4 |
|
Female Lawyer |
125 |
105 |
84.0 |
It can be concluded that a female has a ( 84.0 73.4 ) 10.6 % greater chance of winning if she hires a female lawyer than if she hires a male lawyer for family actions in Superior Court
Self Represented Litigants
The database contained 87 cases where a litigant won or lost, which were contested by one or more self represented parties. The following table reproduces the results.
|
|
Total Cases |
Wins |
% Wins |
|
Male Litigant |
70 |
2 |
2.9 |
|
Female Litigant |
17 |
4 |
23.5 |
|
Total |
87 |
6 |
6.9 |
It can be concluded that self represented litigants have a 6.9 % chance of winning in Superior Court family actions. Female self represented parties are (23.5/2.9) 8.1 times more likely to win than males
The data for self represented parties included 4 cases which had 2 self represented litigants. In these cases a self represented party necessarily had to be the winner. In 3 of the 4 cases a female litigant won, so female self represented parties won 3 to 1 compared to men.. To determine a self represented persons odds if opposed by a lawyer those cases must be omitted. The following table reproduces those results.
|
|
Total Cases |
Wins |
% Wins |
|
Male Litigant |
69 |
1 |
1.5 |
|
Female Litigant |
14 |
1 |
7.1 |
|
Total |
83 |
2 |
2.4 |
It can be concluded that self represented litigants have a 2.4 % chance of winning in Superior Court family actions when the opposing party is a lawyer Female self represented parties are (7.1/1.5) 4.7 times more likely to win than males
|
|
Male Judge |
Female Judge |
|
Male Wins |
61 |
24 |
|
Female Wins |
171 |
90 |
|
Divided Success |
29 |
18 |
|
Total |
261 |
133 |
Discrimination Index for a Male Judge = % Female Wins - % Male Wins
= (171/261 x 100) (61/261 x 100)
= 65.5 23.4
= 42.1 %
Discrimination Index for a Female Judge = % Female Wins - % Male Wins
= (90/133 x 100) ( 24/133 x 100)
= 67.7 18.0
= 49.7
It can be concluded that males are 7.6 % more likely to win when appearing before a male judge than if the case is heard by a female judge.
|
Total Wins |
Female Wins |
% Female Wins |
Male Wins |
% Male Wins |
Divided Success |
% Divided Success |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
264 |
64.5 |
87 |
21.3 |
58 |
14.2 |
From 404 cases containing record of 409 cost penalties it can be concluded women won 43.2 % more often than men
|
|
Average Cost Penalty |
Divorce Action Cost Penalty |
Interim Cost Penalty |
Support Variation Cost Penalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male Litigant Wins |
21. 6 K |
45.9 K |
4.5 K |
8.5 K |
|
Female Litigant Wins |
31.6 K |
76.7 K |
6.8 K |
11.4 K |
From 404 cases containing record of 409 cost penalties it can be concluded women pay 31.6 % lower cost penalties than men. The range varies for different actions from 25.4 % lower for support variations to 40.1 % lower for overall divorce awards.
|
|
Female With a Female Lawyer |
Female with a Male Lawyer |
Female Self Represented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male with a Female Lawyer % Wins |
21.4 |
53.3 |
100.0 |
|
Male with a Male Lawyer % Wins |
21.0 |
27.6 |
83.3 |
|
Male Self Represented % Wins |
0.0 |
2.6 |
25.0 |
From a varying number of representation combinations in cases where one or the other litigant won, it can be seen that men have the highest odds when they have a female lawyer and the lowest odds when they are self represented. Women also have the highest odds when they have a female lawyer and the lowest odds self represented
|
|
Male Judge |
Female Judge |
|
|
|
|
|
Male % Wins |
23.4 |
18.0 |
|
Female % Wins |
65.5 |
67.7 |
|
Divided Success |
11.1 |
14.3 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
From 261 cases where a litigant appeared before a male judge it can be concluded women won 42.1 % more often than men. From 133 cases where a litigant appeared before a female judge, women won 49.7 % more often than men.
|
Winners sex |
Lawyers sex |
|
Case |
Judges sex |
Judge |
Costs
|
Description and amount |
|
m |
F v m |
|
Bourque v. Haney, 2003 CanLII 2068 (ON S.C.) |
|
Blair |
Full and partial |
Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, asks 6.9 K gets 5.8 K |
|
m |
F v f |
E |
O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2007 CanLII 8930 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, husband claims 19.8 K and gets 5 K, wife claims 8.4 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Boyko |
Partial |
Interim motion, $ 650 costs |
|
m |
F v f |
E |
Ladisa v. Ladisa, 2004 CanLII 15138 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife claims 35 K costs, husband claims 28 K and gets 10 K |
|
m |
M v m |
E |
Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2003 CanLII 1995 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
20K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
E |
Sloss v. Forget, 2005 CanLII 4843 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Motion for mobility and support, 6 K costs |
|
m |
F v m |
E |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 11238 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Support trial, 7 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Ce |
Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Ferguson |
Partial |
Interim motion on access variation, 0.3 K costs |
|
m |
M v sr |
T |
Dagorne v. Cormack, 2007 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Partial |
Interim motion, 0.75 K cost penalty, secomnd interim 0.75 cost penalty, wife hasnt paid first penalty |
|
m |
F v m |
T |
A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
Full |
Wife gets 48 K cost penalty on custody access action. |
|
m |
F v m |
T |
Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Macdonald |
Partial |
Contempt motion for arrears, 4.25 K cost including 0.75 K for cost submissions |
|
m |
F v m |
E |
D.W. v. C.O, 2006 CanLII 16361 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Child Support Application, 3 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
E |
Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2005 CanLII 48697 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, husband gets 4.8 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Sw |
Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Divorce action, 15 day trial, wife must pay 32.5 K and her lawwyer 5 K in costs |
|
m |
F v m |
Sw |
Bowcock v. Bowcock, 2005 CanLII 18193 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Husband must call motion to terminate support because of wifes actions, asks for 6.8 K gets 5.5 K |
|
m |
F v f |
Sw |
Miller v. Miller, 2005 CanLII 463 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Wife motion for supervised access fails 1.5 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Sw |
Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 13238 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Divorce, husband gets 8 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Nw |
Kuluski v. Adams, 2002 CanLII 2684 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Pierce |
Partial |
Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, 4.2 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Rodgers |
Partial |
Interim motion, $ 675 costs |
|
m |
M v m |
E |
Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Rutherford |
Partial |
Contempt motion for disclosure dismissed, 1.5 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cw |
A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 32619 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Snowie |
Partial |
Divorce action lasting 11 years where wife made numerous false allegations, 252.9 K cosdts |
|
m |
M v sr |
Cw |
Euteneier v. Euteneier, 2007 CanLII 9609 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Snowie |
Partial |
Husband asks 18.9 K and gets 6.3 K, wife declared as vextacious litigant on summary judgement |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
St. Louis v. St. Louis, 2007 CanLII 11730 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Tucker |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband seeks 21 K gets 10 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Cw |
Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2326 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Partial |
Interim motion, $ 150, wife has not paid 6 K costs under appeal |
|
m |
|
Cw |
Stanley v. Stanley, 2003 CanLII 2351 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Partial |
Husband gets wifes action stayed 13.7 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
Heath v. Heath, 2006 CanLII 19458 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wildman |
Full |
Contempt motion, wife empties house with moving van against direct court order, 15 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
L.K. v. T.G., 2007 CanLII 10411 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wildman |
Partial |
Husband wins motion for unsupervised access, claims 20 K and gets 10 K |
|
m |
M v m |
|
Gartley v. Church, 2002 CanLII 2727 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Partial |
Motion to adjust support overpayment, Husband is partially successful and claims 27 K and gets 3.5 K, wife claims 25 K |
|
m |
M v m |
|
Sharpe v. Ebers, 2002 CanLII 2725 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Partial |
Support variation, 4 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Cw |
J.P.S.V. v. M.V., 2006 CanLII 10530 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Bellighem |
Partial |
Support variation, 2.5 K costs |
|
m |
|
Cw |
Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2246 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Bellighem |
Partial |
Interim motion to set support, 3 K costs |
|
m |
M v sr |
Cw |
Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2186 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Bellinghem |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband has 40 K costs and gets 12 K |
|
m |
M v m |
T |
Walker v. Walker, 2006 CanLII 20095 (ON S.C.) |
M |
C Campbell |
Partial |
Husband gets 5 K |
|
m |
|
Sw |
Broz v. Broz, 1998 CanLII 14477 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Wife obstructs access gets 8.5 K cost penalty offset against husbands 6.4 K equalization and retroactive support, claims costs of 20 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Sw |
Cumpson v. Templeton, 2005 CanLII 50010 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Husband wins custody and mobility trial, 14 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Sw |
MacRae v. Simpson, 2003 CanLII 2307 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Half day motion, husband asks 27.8 K and gets 5.8 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Sw |
Snih v. Snih, 2007 CanLII 20774 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Wife loses custody action, husband claims 30 K and gets 18 K |
|
m |
M v m |
CS |
Belanger v. Belanger, 2005 CanLII 30867 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cavarzan |
Partial |
9.5 K against wife, husband has custody |
|
m |
F v m |
E |
Guιnette v. Brisebois, 2004 CanLII 33294 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Charbonneau |
Partial |
Husband gets interim custody, divided success,3 motions 1 K coststo be paid by wife |
|
m |
|
Sw |
Moore v. Riley, 2005 CanLII 24928 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cusinato |
Partial |
Husband gets increased access, 2 K costs for interim motion |
|
m |
F v sr |
Ne |
Levesque v. Little, 2007 CanLII 1910 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Del Frate |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband asks 53.2 K and gets 22.5 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Ne |
Ansara v. Ansara, 2007 CanLII 6235 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Del Frate |
Partial |
Interim motion on acces and support, 3 K costs deferred to trial |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
Ross v. Pishalski, 2005 CanLII 9678 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Ditomaso |
Partial |
Motion to determine jurisdiction, 3.5 Kcosts |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
Graham v. Kuntz, 2005 CanLII 44387 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Festeryga |
Partial |
Support variation, 9 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Harrington v. Harrington, 2007 CanLII 27754 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Festeryga |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband asks 129 K gets 89 K |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
Debruyn v. Debruyn, 2005 CanLII 11206 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Full and partial |
Divorce action, wife gets 9.5 K costs and her lawyer gets 5 K costs and cant bill wife for trial time |
|
m |
F v sr |
Cs |
Duquette v. Gregorio, 2006 CanLII 32615 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Motion for expanded access, 2.4 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 16229 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Full |
Husband asks 58 K and gets 16 K in support variation |
|
m |
F v m |
Cs |
Munro v. Munro, 2005 CanLII 22142 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife and lawyer dont attend forst motion, 3 K costs to wife, 1 K costs to wifes lawyer |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
Rossi v. Rossi, 2005 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
3 day trial of support variation, 35 K cost penalty |
|
m |
M v f |
Ce |
Hill v. Hill, 2005 CanLII 3476 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glass |
Partial |
Motion to enforce a separation agreement, husband claims 21 K gets 16 K |
|
m |
F v m |
Ce |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glass |
Partial and full |
Divorce action, 6o K costs |
|
m |
F v m |
Cs |
Balaban v. Balaban, 2007 CanLII 7990 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Full |
Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Cornaz v. Cornaz-Nikyuluw, 2005 CanLII 47770 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Hague convention case to return child to husband, husband asks 62 K gets 31 K |
|
m |
F v sr |
Cs |
Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Divorce action 13.6 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Visneskie v. Visneskie, 2003 CanLII 2264 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband asks for 54.5 K and gets 45.5 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2006 CanLII 32637 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Interim motions, wife claims 115 K paid to lawyers, husband claims 60 K, 32 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 19785 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Interim motion, 3 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Stockie v. Stockie, 2003 CanLII 2352 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Interim motion, 2 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Takis v. Takis, 2003 CanLII 2256 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband asks 64 K and gets 32 K |
|
m |
M v f |
Cs |
Bjornson v. Creighton, 2007 CanLII 14321 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Motion, 1.5 K |
|
m |
M v sr |
Cs |
Girard v. Girard, 2007 CanLII 28740 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Access motion and police not needed, costs to husband $ 100 |
|
m |
M v sr |
Cs |
Hockey-Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2002 CanLII 2721 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife acts unreasonably, 200 K costs |
|
m |
F v m |
Cs |
Tucker v. Tucker, 2002 CanLII 2761 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, 5.1 K costs |
|
m |
Sr v m |
Cs |
Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 43349 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Harris |
Partial |
Interim motion, wifes lawyer doesnt respond, 1.5 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
Tavernier v. Tavernier, 2004 CanLII 5089 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Howden |
Partial |
Wife wins motion but is censred for actions, 2 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Ne |
Borsos v. Borsos, 2006 CanLII 31201 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Loukidelis |
Partial |
Divorce sction, husband asks 47.1 K and gets 7.5 K |
|
m |
F v m |
|
Raguckas v. Raguckas, 2007 CanLII 2360 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Mazza |
Partial |
Divorce action, 40.7 K |
|
m |
F v m |
Nw |
Goeldner v. Goeldner, 2004 CanLII 14348 (ON S.C.) |
M |
McCartney |
Partial |
Divorce action no children, costs 47 K plus 2.6 K prejudgement interest |
|
m |
F v m |
Nw |
Hensel v. Hensel, 2006 CanLII 40672 (ON S.C.) |
M |
McCartney |
Partial |
Interim motion for daycare, 1.5 K costs |
|
m |
Fv sr |
Nw |
Jones v. Cole, 2007 CanLII 21956 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Mccartney |
Partial |
Wifes motion for custody fails, husband asks for 76 K and gets 28 K |
|
m |
F v sr |
Nw |
St. James v. St. James, 2006 CanLII 31618 (ON S.C.) |
M |
McCartney |
Partial |
Interim motion, 5 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Cw |
Philip v. Philip, 2006 CanLII 39319 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Oconnor |
Partial |
Divorce action, 10 day trial, husband claims 182.5 K and gets 82.8 K costs, includes 16.3 K offset for interim cost penalty man got but hasnt paid |
|
m |
F v sr |
Ce |
Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 2084 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
2 motions, 10 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Ce |
Savoie v. Richard, 2004 CanLII 47793 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Motion, husband asks for 6.8 K gets 2 K |
|
m |
Sr v sr |
Nw |
L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 21777 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Partial |
Husband claims 50 K for divorce and gets 27.5 K, wife claims 91 K |
|
m |
M v sr |
Nw |
Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Full |
Divorce action, wife makes fraud claim, husband asks 102 K gets 67 K |
|
m |
|
Sw |
Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Quinn |
Partial |
|
|
m |
M v f |
Nw |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Shaw |
Partial |
Wife withdraws interim motion, 3.5 K costs for unheard motion |
|
m |
F v m |
Cw |
X.M. v. S.A.M., 2007 CanLII 23596 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sproat |
Full and Partial |
18.8 K costs for trial, 54.6 K for divorce |
|
m |
|
Nw |
Gale v. Gale, 2006 CanLII 40788 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Stach |
Partial and full |
Interim motions in 3 courts, 27.9 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
Caldwell v. Caldwell, 2007 CanLII 8918 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Timm |
Full |
Motion for support against wife who hasnt paid, 20 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Ce |
Mercieca v. Merciera, 2003 CanLII 2184 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Timms |
Partial |
Divorce action, 15 K costs |
|
m |
F v m |
Cw |
Finucan v. Finucan, 2006 CanLII 30590 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Tulloch |
Partial |
Motion, 3 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Cw |
Sincovich v. Sincovich, 2005 CanLII 33591 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Tulloch |
Partial |
Husband successful in custody support application, claims 45 K gets 12 K costs |
|
m |
|
Cs |
Bolduc v. Bolduc, 2006 CanLII 35976 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Trial, husband claims 25 K gets 15 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Cs |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 8024 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Interim motion, 0.8 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Sw |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2004 CanLII 4015 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Vogelsang |
Partial |
Custody and access motion, 2.7 K costs |
|
m |
M v f |
Sw |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2004 CanLII 4874 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Vogelsang |
Partial |
Motion to change principle residence during school term, 2.7 K |
|
m |
M v m |
Ne |
Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Whalen |
Partial |
Divorce action, 5 ½ years to get to trial, 211 K costs |
|
m |
M v m |
Ce |
S.M.G. v. M.J.J.G., 2006 CanLII 16 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Wood |
Partial |
Custody variance, husband asks 50 K gets 7.5 K |
|
Winners sex |
Lawyers sex |
|
Case |
Judges sex |
Judge |
Costs
|
Description and Amount |
|
w |
L v sr |
|
Sloan v. Sloan, 2003 CanLII 2245 (ON S.C.) |
|
Laforme |
Partial |
Wife asks 34 K for motion, gets 10 K |
|
w |
F v m |
|
Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.) |
|
Milanetti |
Partial |
Motion, wife asks 75 K in costs and gets 25 K, and wife gets 3 K in cost for case conference |
|
w |
F v sr |
|
Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19844 (ON S.C.) |
|
Zelinski |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife 60 % successful, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 889 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aiken |
Partial |
Support motion, 3 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Doherty v. Wilcox, 2007 CanLII 5527 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Partial |
Support variation, divided success, wife asks 8.3 K and gets 4 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Partial |
Motion for prejudgemenet interest on equalization, 5 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Jonas v. Jonas, 2003 CanLII 1967 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Full |
Divorce action 2 day trial, husbands pleadings struck, 22.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 196 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife asks 5.9 K and gets 3.8 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Partial |
Wife asks 95.1 K for divorce action And gets 12 K for post appeal motion |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 25768 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, wife asks for 8.7 K and gets 5 K costs |
|
w |
|
T |
Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Backhouse |
Full |
Wife asks for 2.6 million and gets 2.25 million for divorce |
|
w |
M v sr |
|
Hollowell v. Hollowell, 2003 CanLII 2316 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Bain |
Partial |
Interim motion to change support, husband does not show up, 1.2 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
|
McLellan v. McIntyre, 2003 CanLII 2330 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Bain |
Partial |
Motion settled on consent but 3 K costs to wife |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Mantella v. Mantella, 2005 CanLII 26320 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Baltman |
Partial |
Motion toset aside separatrion agreement, wife asks 31.5 K and gets 10.9 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Martins v. Martins, 2006 CanLII 24242 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Baltman |
Partial |
Motion to set arrears, wife claims 13.6 K and gets 7.2 K costs |
|
w |
M v f |
|
Bourque v. Haney, 2003 CanLII 2068 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blair |
Partial |
Wife keeps interim custody despite being ordered back to Ontario, asks 4.1 K gets 3.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Biddle v. Biddle, 2005 CanLII 7660 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Partial |
Wife claims 19.5 K for interim support motion and gets 12 K |
|
w |
M v f |
E |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 42254 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Partial |
Motion, Wife claims 8.4 K and gets 4 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Partial |
Interim motion to strike pleadings, 2.5 K costs, precvious interim motion for custody 5.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Piskor v. Piskor, 2004 CanLII 5023 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Full |
Support variation, 18 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Stratton v. Kangas, 2002 CanLII 46690 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Partial |
Wife sucessful on 2 out of 3 issues, 3.5 K partial indemnity asked and gets 2 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Zlater v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 30664 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Full |
Motion for university expense, 9.6 K costs, ruling better than offer to settle |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Boyko |
Partial |
Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, husband asks 100K, wife gets 24.4 K |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Parker v. Parker, 2004 CanLII 14179 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Croll |
Partial |
Interim motion for custody and support, wife gets 4.7 K |
|
w |
F v f |
E |
A.D. v. M.J., 2006 CanLII 37515 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Motion, wife found in contempt, 8 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 1920 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Interim motion for possession of home and leave to appeal, 3.5 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 8635 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Man achieves substancial success on motion to vary but wife goven 10 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
M.I. v. J.R., 2005 CanLII 7663 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife allowed to move to Japan, 15 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Martin v. Martin, 2007 CanLII 8638 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Full |
Support variation,40 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
P.R. v. K.R., 2003 CanLII 1918 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Desousa |
Full |
Divorce action, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 36.9 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Surrette v. Johnson, 2003 CanLII 2282 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Partial |
Support variation, divided success, 1 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Desousa |
Partial |
Motion for leave to appeal, 9 K costs |
|
w |
|
Ce |
Critch v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 16630 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Eberhard |
Partial |
Motion, 4 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Eberhard |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 58 K gets 40 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ce |
Ernyes v. Rachlin, 2004 CanLII 47867 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Eberhard |
Partial |
Contempt motion, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Eberhard |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ce |
Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2006 CanLII 22144 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Eberhard |
Partial |
Variation, 2.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v f |
Ce |
Dorion v. Merkley, 2006 CanLII 38357 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Ferguson |
Partial |
Husband loses interim motion 5.2 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Ferguson |
Partial |
6 K costs for interim motions to vary support |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Ferguson |
Partial |
Interim motion on access variation, 2.1 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Greer |
Full |
Interim motion to determine support, wife asks 99 K gets |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Adamson v. Steed, 2007 CanLII 1328 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Partial |
3 day trial, wife asks 47.5 K gets 20 K |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44265 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Partial |
Motion, 2.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
D'Costa v. D'Costa, 2005 CanLII 56207 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Partial |
Support variation, wife asks for 19.3 K and gets 13.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
David v. McCain, 2006 CanLII 9302 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
Partial |
Interim motion for custody access, wife asks 20 K and gets 15 K, husband asks 40 K and gets increased access |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Fox v. Fox, 2006 CanLII 21065 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
Partial |
Divorce action with a 10 day trial, wife asks 200 K gets 85.8 K |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Matanovic v. Matanovic, 2005 CanLII 47788 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife asks 10.3 Kand gets 2.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2032 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
Partial |
Support variaton, 17 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
|
Rose v. Rose, 2004 CanLII 17755 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Katarynych |
Partial |
Motion to vary child support dismissed, 14.1 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Coscarella v. Coscarella, 2000 CanLII 20376 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Lack |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife asks 2.6 K and gets 1.4 K, no costs for either side in divorce action |
|
w |
Mv m |
|
DeBora v. DeBora, 2003 CanLII 2216 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Lang, Benotto, Zelinski |
Partial |
3 Interim motions, wife gets16 K costs |
|
w |
Sr v m |
T |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 1931 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Lax |
Partial |
Self represented wife gets 10 K costs for application |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Macdonald |
Partial |
Husband gets default of over 13 Kin costs penalties set aside but gets cost penalty of 1.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Macdonald |
Partial |
Divorce action, 70 K cost |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Nichele v. Nichele, 2003 CanLII 1901 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Macdonald |
Partial |
Preliminary hearing in motion to vary support oirder, 5 K costs, man is allowed to proceed |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Interim motions, 2 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 15397 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 35 K and gets 25 K |
|
w |
M v f |
E |
Likins v. MacKenzie, 2004 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Divorce action. Arbitrators cost award of 110 K reduced to 67 K, 10 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
N.(D.) v. E.(T.), 2000 CanLII 21156 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Full |
Wife win trial of custody and gets 6.5 K costs, asks for 10 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Partial |
Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgement interest |
|
w |
M v f |
E |
F. v. V., 2002 CanLII 2767 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinon |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks for 158 K and gets 95 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Silver v. Mercer, 2003 CanLII 2039 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Makinnon |
Partial |
Wife gets 4.3 K for motion to set support |
|
w |
M v m |
Sw |
MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
partial |
Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial |
|
w |
F v f |
Sw |
Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Wife gets 1.8 K in costs from interim motion |
|
w |
M v m |
Sw |
Deelstra v. Van Osch, 2003 CanLII 2007 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Full |
Divorce action, 4 day trial, wife gets custody 29.6 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Sw |
Giguere v. Giguere, 2004 CanLII 5004 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Partial |
Trial of support, 12.1 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Sw |
Morrison v. Morrison, 2003 CanLII 1950 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Marshman |
Full |
Divorce action, 7.5 K costs |
|
w |
M m |
Cs |
Patterson v. Patterson, 2007 CanLII 26288 (ON S.C.) |
F |
McLaren |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife successful on 4 out of 6 issues, wife asks 342 K and gets 144.6 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
David v. David, 2005 CanLII 10541 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Olah |
Partial |
Divorce trial, wife gets 42 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Denby v. Denby, 2003 CanLII 2097 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Olah |
Full |
Divorve action, 4 day trial, 28.7 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Fequet v. Petelka Fequet, 2003 CanLII 2200 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Polowin |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband asks for 21 K and wife gets 9.7 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Rogers |
|
Uncontested trial, husbands pleadings strck, 11 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ce |
Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Rogers |
Full |
Interims motions to strike pleadings, 7 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Sachs |
Partial |
Motion for access and crossmotion for support, 4 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2006 CanLII 20528 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Scott |
Partial |
Divorce action, 84.9 K costs, and 3 K costs to apportion award. |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Snowie |
Partial |
Divorce action, 997.7 K costs, appealrd to the court of Appeal, 20 K more costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Cw |
Reid v. Reid, 2005 CanLII 2743 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Snowie |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife spends 62 K and gets 19.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2003 CanLII 2268 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Snowie |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife aks 4.5 K gets 3 K |
|
w |
M v f |
T |
Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 CanLII 15236 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Stewart |
Full |
Contempt motion, 16.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Qi v. Fung, 2006 CanLII 16366 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Stewart |
Partial |
Motion for child support, husbands income imputed to 40 K, 1.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Lakhani v. Lakhani, 2003 CanLII 2160 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Toscano Roccano |
Partial |
9 K to wife for motion |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Toscano Romano |
Partial |
Interim motion, 1.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Gill v. Knack, 2007 CanLII 1332 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Tucker |
Partial |
Only remaining issue was Christmas access, 3.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Siconolfi v. Siconolfi, 2007 CanLII 1327 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Tucker |
Partial |
Divorce action partially settled, wife asks 15.5 K gets 7 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Islam v. Rahman, 2006 CanLII 22137 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Van Melle |
|
Divorce action, 183.8 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Chaudhry v. Chaudhry, 2003 CanLII 2005 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife asks 46 K gets 9.2 K |
|
w |
M v f |
Cw |
McLean v. Vassel, 2004 CanLII 33012 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Partial |
9.5 K for support variation, requested 88 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Ramcharitar v. Ramcharitar, 2003 CanLII 1997 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Partial |
Wife asks for 55 K partial or 98 K full and gets 34 K, post divorce action for custody access. |
|
w |
|
Cw |
S.R.S. v. A.H.H., 2004 CanLII 5038 (ON S.C.)
|
F |
Wein |
Full |
Husband unemployed and retraining, 8.2 K cost penalty |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cw |
Wentzell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 4032 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wein |
Fulll |
Trial cancelled due to agreement but husband gets 19.5 K costs for contempt motion withdrawn at last moment. |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wildman |
Full |
Mans pleadings struck when self represented for notpaying cost award,15 K |
|
w |
F v f |
Ce |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 22662 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Wildman |
Full |
Wies motion for summary judgement fails, 10.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
|
Delellis v. Delellis and Delellis, 2005 CanLII 36447 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Partial |
Family claim including constructive trust, wife and child win 50 K and 10 K cost, claim 45 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
|
Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Partial |
Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K |
|
w |
M v m |
|
Osmar v. Osmar, 2000 CanLII 20380 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Partial ( 85 % ) |
Wife asks for 33 K and gets 25 K for trial |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belch |
Partial |
Wife asks 11 K and gets 3.5 K for supoort / income determination motion |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
McCaw v. McCaw, 2007 CanLII 6920 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belch |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 69 K gets 35 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
J.D.K v. K.W.B.K, 2005 CanLII 38100 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Bellegham |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 73 K gets 48 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Peters v. Peters, 2003 CanLII 2198 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belleghem |
Partial |
Divorce action, divided success wife gets at least 38 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cw |
Schmidt v. Seidel, 2004 CanLII 17443 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Bellighem |
Partial |
Custody variation. Joint custody changed to sole custody to wife, $ 850 costs |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Feher v. Healey, 2006 CanLII 33312 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belobaba |
Partial |
Husband sues wife over transfer of home and loses, wife asks for 26 K and gets 14 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Bremer v. Bremer, 2005 CanLII 6387 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Borkovich |
|
15 K costs incurred by wife due to husbands intransience |
|
w |
|
Ce |
Lyons v. Tuffner, 2007 CanLII 30665 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Brown |
Partial |
Interim motion, 1.5 K cosys |
|
w |
M v m |
|
Biggin v. Maloney, 2006 CanLII 7511 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Simple case, 1.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
|
Brennan v. Brennan, 2002 CanLII 2742 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Interim motion,both parties claim to have spent over 30 K, 2.1 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
|
Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2004 CanLII 5858 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Full |
Divorce action, wife gets 85 K |
|
w |
F v m |
|
Waywell v. Waywell, 2004 CanLII 7577 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Wife asks 30 K for interim support relief and gets 2 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
|
Ficca v. Ficca, 2004 CanLII 6226 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Partial |
Motion to change access, 1.8 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Tessarolo v. Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 30882 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cavarzan |
Partial |
Wife asks for 6 K, husband asks for 12 K, wife gets 10 K |
|
w |
|
E |
Poirier v. Poirier, 2006 CanLII 2188 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Charboneau |
Partial |
Divorce, 36 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Clark |
Partial and full |
2 motions and a case conference, 23 K in costs |
|
w |
M v f |
T |
Molitor v. Andreou, 2006 CanLII 3481 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Clark |
Partial |
Interim support motion, husband ordered to pay 5.3 K per month support, 5 Kcosts |
|
w |
M v m |
T |
Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 6047 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Clarke |
Partial |
Costs of motion 4 K |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Copp v. Copp, 2004 CanLII 34077 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Clarke |
Partial |
Divorce Action, 15 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Mantella v. Mantella, 2006 CanLII 17337 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Corbett |
Partial on wife and full on lawyer |
Man sues wifes divorce lawyer, 14 K plus 1 K for cost submission to wife, 22 K plus 1 K cost submission to lawyer |
|
w |
F v m |
Sw |
Dias v. Dias, 2005 CanLII 41541 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cusinato |
Partial |
Interim motion on sale of property, 2.3 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Sw |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 31729 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cusinato |
Partial |
Support variation, 12.4 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Sw |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2006 CanLII 819 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cusinato |
Partial |
All issues settled prior to trial except spousal support, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2007 CanLII 11716 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Czurtin |
Partial |
Motion tovary support, wife asks 13.5 K and gets 7 K |
|
w |
Mm v |
Sw |
Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 5488 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Desotti |
Partial |
Divorce action with 3 day trial, wife gets 12 K, husband asks45 K |
|
w |
F v f |
Ce |
Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.) |
M |
DiTomaso |
Full |
Default for not abiding by court order to sell home, pleadings struck, 10.3 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Ditomaso |
Partial |
I0 K costs to husband for questioning at which wife refused to answer, previous 6.9 K costs for security motion |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Martin-Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 17019 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Ditomaso |
Partial |
Wife gets husbands motion to vary support stayed and gets 6.6 K costs for motion |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ce |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 9674 (ON S.C.) |
M |
DiTomaso |
Partial |
Motion to stay support and arrears and security, 45.9 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Ragis v. Ragis, 2005 CanLII 18854 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fedak |
Partial |
Divorce action, only issue left for trial was support, 10 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Cs |
S.P. v. F.R., 2006 CanLII 19948 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Festeryga |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 25 K and gets 20 .3 K, husband Asks 30.3 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cs |
Atkinson v. Atkinson, 2007 CanLII 14318 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Divorce trial. 14.5 K |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Boddington v. Boddington, 2003 CanLII 45771 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Full |
8.5 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Claer v. Claer, 2006 CanLII 32612 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Motion, wife asks 8.5 K gets 5 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cs |
Cupolo v. Anzovino, 2003 CanLII 2091 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
1K for ex parte divorce, requested 11 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Johannesson v. Johannesson, 2003 CanLII 2141 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Contempt access motion by husband, 2.1 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Lagos v. Lagos, 2006 CanLII 43492 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Motion, 6.9 K costs |
|
w |
Sr v sr |
Cs |
Platonova v. Platonov, 2005 CanLII 2951 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Divorce action, self represented wife gets 2 K costs against iuntrasient husband |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Vernon v. Vernon, 2006 CanLII 23266 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Motion for support, wifes partial lawyers bill 47 K, 15 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Wrixon v. Wrixon, 2006 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Motion, 3.4 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 47798 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
72 K costs in action involving retroactive support |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Nittel v. Nittel, 2007 CanLII 14340 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Flynn |
Partial |
Divorce action 22 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Bradley v. Bradley, 2003 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Wife gets 6.5 K for interim motion |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Collin v. Collin, 2005 CanLII 48919 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Support variation, divided success, wife gets 1.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Elder v. Elder, 2006 CanLII 3276 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, husband asks 10.3 K and wife gets 3.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Interim motion, 2,5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Lowe v. Lowe, 2006 CanLII 3280 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Motion, 6 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cw |
Trick v. Trick, 2005 CanLII 48923 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Partial |
Wifes motion for husbands non compliance, 10 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Kirby v. Chappell, 2003 CanLII 1990 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glass |
Full |
Divorce action with trial, 9 K costs |
|
w |
|
Ce |
Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glass |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife claims 7.7 K and gets 5.5 K, husband claims 8.2 K |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Ashley v. Ashley, 2006 CanLII 32603 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Support motion, 8 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Defoe v. Defoe, 2004 CanLII 5040 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Divorce action, all but support settled on consent, wife gets 1.2 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Erb v. Erb, 2003 CanLII 2308 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 23.8 K gets 17.9 K |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Harnum v. Harnum, 2005 CanLII 3231 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Glithero |
Partial |
12.6 K costs for 2 day trial |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 17600 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Full |
Divorce action, 17.9 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
F.J.N. v. J.L.N., 2004 CanLII 34783 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Divorce action including mobility, wife asks 20.2 K gets 15 K |
|
w |
M v f |
Cs |
Craig v. Craig, 2004 CanLII 5039 (ON S.C.) |
M, |
Gordon |
Full |
Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
1 day simple trial, 5.9 K costs |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2002 CanLII 2700 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Interim motion, wife asks 4.6 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Lee-Chin v. Lee-Chin, 2005 CanLII 47758 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Several interim motions consolidated into one hearing, wife asks 29.9 K gets 13.4 K, husband asks 37.1 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Mayer v. Mayer, 2003 CanLII 2177 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Interim motion on parenting schedule, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Plotz v. Boehmer-Plotz, 2004 CanLII 34349 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Trial; of support, 6.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife wins mobility, asks 190 K and gets 150 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Nw |
Norland v. Norland, 2007 CanLII 20786 (ON S.C.) |
M |
GP Smith |
Partial |
Wife gets 6.6 K for interim motion |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Fulmer v. Kaleo-Fulmer, 2002 CanLII 2719 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
2.6 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Gentle v. Gentle, 2007 CanLII 26606 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Motion to vary support. 3.8 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
R.W.L. v. K.A.L., 2003 CanLII 2168 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Husband brings motion for custody assessment and access, 5.9 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Tzeng v. Tzeng, 2007 CanLII 17042 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Wife gets 112.4 K costs in assault action against husband, 150 K damage award |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Brandon v. Brandon, 2003 CanLII 2069 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Access motion to determine where children gotoscholl, 0.7 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Buck v. Buck, 2003 CanLII 2072 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Full |
Unnecesary motion, 8.9 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Fleming v. Fleming, 2005 CanLII 19832 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Motion to vary access to unsupervised, 0.8 K costs |
|
w |
|
Cs |
Reid v. Warren, 2003 CanLII 2221 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Full |
Interim motion for disclosure |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 34788 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Full |
Separation agreement varied, 58.7 K costs |
|
w |
M v f |
Cs |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Partial |
Divorce action, 7.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Cauchy-Eckardt v. Eckardt, 2004 CanLII 6225 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hamby |
Partial |
Support motion, wife asks 8 K and gets 7.4 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Costa v. Costa, 2002 CanLII 2708 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Harris |
Partial |
Divorce action, 5 day trial, wife asks 41.7 K and gets 34.3 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Appeal of support variance, 2 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Keen v. Keen, 2007 CanLII 6919 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Divorce action settled on consent except support, 9.4 costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Longpre v. Skursky, 2005 CanLII 31301 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Motion to vary support dismissed, $ 250 costs unless higher bill approved |
|
w |
F v f |
Cs |
MacGregor v. Stone, 2004 CanLII 42944 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Divorce action with 10 day trial, 62 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Racz v. Racz, 2004 CanLII 39025 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Divorce action settled on consent, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Zeleny v. Zeleny, 2004 CanLII 5094 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial rate raised from agreement |
Wife agreed to pay lawyer $ 90 per hour but judge raises it to $ 195, 7.8 K for one motion |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Cianflone v. Cianflone, 2006 CanLII 37127 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Henderson |
Partial |
Divorce action no kids 14.3 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Howden |
Partial |
Support variation, 15.K |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Howden |
Partial |
Interim motion to vary support, 4.7 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Howden |
Full |
Divorce action, 89.6 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Sloan v. Sloan, 2006 CanLII 38366 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Howden |
Partial |
Support variation, 12.4 costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Finch v. Finch, 2003 CanLII 9776 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Kruzick |
Partial |
Support variation, wife asks for 23 K and gets 6 K |
|
w |
|
Cw |
Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 2002 CanLII 2792 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Langdon |
Partial |
Motion to change jurisdiction, 6 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Galambos v. Towers, 2006 CanLII 29661 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Lofchik |
Partial |
Divorce action no children, wife asks for 60.4 K andgets 44.7K |
|
w |
M v m |
Ne |
Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Loukidelis |
Partial |
Appeal, 10 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Fancett v. Deprato, 2006 CanLII 2402 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Mackenzie |
Partial and full |
Wife asks ror 68 K and gets 34 K for divorce action |
|
w |
M v f |
Cw |
Irwin v. Irwin, 2006 CanLII 5451 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Mackenzie |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife claims 47 K and gets 31.5 K, husband claims 42 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Chapin v. Chapin, 2003 CanLII 2080 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Matheson |
Partial |
Support variation, $ 750 costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Matheson |
Partial |
Motion unsuccessfully appealed, 6 K costs |
|
w |
M v f |
Cs |
Hines v. Hines, 2007 CanLII 2208 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Matheson |
Partial |
Support action, 3.1 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Matheson |
Partial and full |
Divorce action with 9 days of trial involving constructive trust, 103.4 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Rawlins v. Rawlins, 2006 CanLII 28560 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Matheson |
Partial |
Variation, wife asks 25.7 K and gets 8.7 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Nw |
Almgren v. Almgren, 2006 CanLII 7502 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Mccartney |
Partial |
Divorce action, all that was left for triasl was support, wife asks 18.6 and gets 12 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Nw |
Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 8876 (ON S.C.) |
M |
McCartney |
Partial and full |
Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, wife asks 45.5 K and gets 31 K |
|
w |
Mv f |
Sw |
Aunger v. Aunger, 2005 CanLII 9665 (ON S.C.) |
M |
McDonald |
partial |
33.8 K for trial |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ne |
Rose v. Rose, 2004 CanLII 17755 (ON S.C.) |
M |
ONeil |
Partial |
Application to vary custody and support dismissed, 3.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ne |
Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2130 (ON S.C.) |
M |
ONeill |
Partial |
Trial of support, wife claims 43 K gets 3.5 K, husband also claims over 40 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ne |
Borden v. Racicot, 2003 CanLII 2065 (ON S.C.) |
M |
ONeil |
Partial |
Interim motion, 1.3 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
T |
Narayan v. Padathe, 2006 CanLII 19943 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Paisley |
Full |
Divorce action, 75 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2120 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Panet |
Partial |
Wifes motion for retroactive support, wife claims 44 K gets 6.5 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Panet |
Partial |
Interim motion, 7.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Meredith v. Meredith, 2002 CanLII 2807 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Panet |
Partial |
Divorce action, divided success, wife gets 3.8 K |
|
w |
M v f |
Ne |
Walker v. Rutledge, 2003 CanLII 2358 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pardu |
Partial |
Divorce action, 18 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Cs |
Damian v. Damian, 2007 CanLII 18021 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pazaratz |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 15.2 K and gets 10.6 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Motion for support variation |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Custody and access variation, wife gets husbands access terminated, 20 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42934 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Full |
Wife gets husbands answer struck, 16 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 19156 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Dividided success in application, husband pays 15K and 1.2 K for costs ruling |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 45568 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Full |
Husbands pleadings struck, 12 K costs for motion |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Interims motions, wife claims 20 K gets 15.5 K |
|
w |
|
Ce |
S.(C.) v. S.(M.), 2007 CanLII 20279 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Full |
Husband denied access to child must pay 320 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Ce |
Sedore v. Sedore, 2006 CanLII 2622 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Divorce action, 7.3 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Ce |
Visconti v. Visconti, 2006 CanLII 2626 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Perkins |
Partial |
Wife gets 3 K on consent motion regarding setting husbands income |
|
w |
F v m |
Nw |
Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2147 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pierce |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife claims 61 K gets 39.5 |
|
w |
F v m |
Nw |
Lord v. Haner-Lord, 2003 CanLII 2174 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Pierce |
Partial |
Interim motion for access, husband more successful but wife in weaker financial situation wife asks for 4.6 K and gets 3 K, husband asks for 5.6 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Nw |
M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pierce |
Full |
Divorce action, 31.4 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
|
Korczynski v. Korczynski, 2007 CanLII 16631 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pierce |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife claims 32.3 K and gets 9 K |
|
w |
Sr v sr |
Nw |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2006 CanLII 28731 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife gets 8.5 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
Nw |
Bauer v. Bauer, 2007 CanLII 16624 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Partial |
Husband makes failed motion for contempt, 3.5 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
Nw |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 16639 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Partial |
Trial of support, wife asks 9.8 K and gets 8.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Nw |
Topetto v. Topetto, 2003 CanLII 1984 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Platana |
Partial |
Divorce action primarily negotiated between parties, wife asks 9.4 K gets 5 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 15761 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Partial |
Wife claims 16.5 K and gets 8.5 K for motion |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Graff v. Graff, 2002 CanLII 2788 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Partial |
Interim motion, 3.8 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 38129 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Partial |
Garnishment hearing, 4 K costs |
|
w |
Sr v sr |
E |
McLean v. Vallance, 2006 CanLII 28910 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Partial |
Wife claims 4.9 K and gets 1 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Full |
Support variation, 10 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Martin v. Martin, 2005 CanLII 11809 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Power |
Partial |
Dsivorce action, wife asks 165 K and gets 49 K |
|
w |
F v f |
Cs |
Logan v. Logan, 2004 CanLII 195 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Quinn |
Partial |
Interim motion for evidence, wife asks 1.5 K gets 0.5 K |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Butler v. Poelstra, 2006 CanLII 41661 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
R Smith |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife asks 16.3 K and gets 5.7 K |
|
w |
M v f |
E |
Fournier v. Burton, 2006 CanLII 42370 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R Smith |
Partial |
Husband loses motion to have support terminated, 4 K |
|
w |
F v m |
E |
Lindsay v. Lindsay, 2003 CanLII 2170 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R Smith |
Partial |
Trial on mobility, 22.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R Smith |
Partial |
Motion to vary support, 5.8 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Reid v. Mulder, 2006 CanLII 9981 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Reilly |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife allowed to move to fiji with child, no costs for custody but 6.4 K for financial |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Roy |
Full |
Divorce action, wife asks 61 K gets 50.7 K |
|
w |
F v sr |
E |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Roy |
Partial |
Interim motions, 5 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Rutherford |
Partial |
Interim motion 3 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Rutherford |
Full |
Interim motion for leave to appeal cost ruling denied |
|
w |
M v m |
E |
Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Rutherford |
Partial |
Interim motion on support application wife didnt pay costs of precious order, .75 K costs |
|
w |
M v sr |
T |
Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 879 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sachs |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife claims 48K gets 10.8 K |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 25103 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Scime |
Partial |
Divorce, wife asks 117 K and gets 75 K, husband asks 306 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Roberts v. Aasen, 2003 CanLII 2000 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sedgwick |
Full |
Custody and access 60.9 K awaed |
|
w |
F v sr |
T |
Hosannah v. Hosannah, 2004 CanLII 9498 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Seigel |
Partial |
Appeal, wife asks for 13.8 K and gets 7 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
|
A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 26161 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Shaw |
Partial |
Wife gets 3 K on interim motion, asks for 6 K |
|
w |
M v m |
|
Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Shaw |
Partial |
Interim motion on sale of home,wife asks 4.5 K and gets 2.3 K, husband asks 5.7 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
E |
Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sheffield |
Partial |
Interim motion, 2 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Bolentiru v. Radulescu, 2004 CanLII 34775 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sills |
Partial |
Divorce action marriage declared invalid, wife asks 45.4 K gets 20.6 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
Loebsack v. Loebsack, 2004 CanLII 16872 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sills |
Partial |
Dovorce action, wife gets 5 K costs |
|
w |
M v f |
|
DeCicco v. DeCicco, 2003 CanLII 2094 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Smith |
Partial |
Wife seeks 73 K for divorce action and gets 20 K. husband claims 45.3 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
T |
Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Spence |
Full |
Contempt motion, 15.8 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesnt pay |
|
w |
F v m |
Cw |
Lemmon v. Lemmon, 2004 CanLII 24123 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sproat |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife gets 3.3 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Cw |
Benak v. Benak, 2006 CanLII 6906 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sproat |
Partial |
Divorce action, wife gets 48.6 K costs |
|
w |
F v f |
Cw |
Hobbs v. Hobbs, 2007 CanLII 26282 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Sproat |
Partial |
Success on motions divided, wife asks 53.5 K and gets 8 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Cs |
F.(J.) v. C.(V.) (No. 7), 2002 CanLII 46717 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Steinberg |
Partial |
Divorce action with 73 day trial, wife asks 290 K and gets 90 K |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 44987 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Stong |
Full |
Motion for support, 12.8 K costs |
|
w |
F v sr |
Ce |
Dunn v. Menear, 2003 CanLII 20236 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Stong |
Full |
Support variation, 4.3 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Metter v. Solomon, 2005 CanLII 9673 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Stong |
Partial |
Support variatio, 15.7 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Ce |
King v. Sutherland, 2005 CanLII 6377 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Strong |
Full |
Motion for support, 4.7 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Ce |
Munro v. Munro, 2004 CanLII 44992 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Strong |
Partial |
2 K cost penalty seeking leave to appeaL 1.5 K cost penalty |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Martin v. Blanchard, 2007 CanLII 26611 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Taylor |
Partial |
Spousal support 2 day truial, 15.7 K |
|
w |
M v sr |
Ce |
Dvernichuk v. Larouche, 2003 CanLII 2107 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Timms |
Partial |
Motion for access and custody, 4.5 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 35629 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Wife asks 45 K and gets 8.5 K in divorce action |
|
w |
F v m |
Cs |
Mitton v. Mitton, 2007 CanLII 4323 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Support motion, 7.4 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 46745 (ON S.C. |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Divorce action, husband declares bakruptcy, 30 K costs |
|
w |
M v m |
Cs |
Young v. Staruck, 2006 CanLII 28111 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Turnbull |
Partial |
Child support variation, 4.1 K |
|
w |
|
|
Simpson v. Miller, 2002 CanLII 2827 (ON S.C.)
|
F |
Wallace |
Full |
Support motion, 11.1 K costs |
|
w |
F v m |
Nw |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Wright |
Full |
Divorce action 36.4 Kcosts |
|
Lawyer Sex |
|
Sex of Judge |
Judge
|
Description |
|
F (f)v m |
Moniz v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.) |
|
Swinton |
Divided success |
|
L v l |
Klein v. Zagdanski, 2004 CanLII 42954 (ON S.C.) |
|
Abbey |
Interim motion consented before return |
|
M v m |
Garlough v. Garlough, 2002 CanLII 2845 (ON S.C.) |
|
Abbey |
Divided success |
|
F v m |
Taylor v. Branconnier, 2003 CanLII 2399 (ON S.C.) |
|
Hennesey |
8 day custody trial, no costs without bad faith |
|
M v m |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25900 (ON S.C.) |
|
Misener |
Divorce action, husband gets better result |
|
M v f (m) |
Stewart v. Jones, 2003 CanLII 2251 (ON S.C.)
|
|
Seppi |
Appealof support, divided success. |
|
L v l |
Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.) |
|
Sheppard |
Application for access due to police order from DV |
|
M v m |
Savage v. O'Brien, 2007 CanLII 3888 (ON S.C.) |
|
Sheppard |
Divorce action continuing for 4 years |
|
M v m |
Theriault v. Theriault, 2007 CanLII 13519 (ON S.C.) |
|
Sills |
Divorce action, dfivided success |
|
Fvm (m) |
Couture v. Couture, 2006 CanLII 25259 (ON S.C.)
|
|
Whitten |
Vary support including retroactive, husband largely successful with offer |
|
Sr v sr |
T.P.S. v. K.E.S, 2007 CanLII 17382 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Divorce action, husband claims, 85.7 K, wife claims 72.5 K, both disentitled to costs |
|
M v m |
Lewis v. Lewis, 2003 CanLII 1973 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Aitken |
Interim support, both partiesacted badly, husband made better offer |
|
M v f (f) |
Vanier v. Vanier, 2003 CanLII 2042 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Blishen |
Divorce action, divided success |
|
Fvm (m) |
Statham v. Statham, 2003 CanLII 2278 (ON S.C.) |
F |
DeSousa |
Wife successful but committed fraud |
|
M v F (m) |
Bautista v. Bautista, 2002 CanLII 46582 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Desousa |
Successful man cant rely on offer to settle as he didnt submit proper disclosure |
|
M v m |
Fell v. Fell, 2007 CanLII 20101 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Desousa |
Mostly settled on consent |
|
F v m (m) |
Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 31374 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Desousa |
Motion to vary supportuccess divided |
|
F v f |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Greer |
Support variation |
|
L v l |
Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Divided success |
|
F v f |
O'Reilly v. O'Reilly, 2006 CanLII 44279 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Wife claim 32 K costs and husband claims 33.4 K, success divided |
|
L v l |
Ferazzutti v. Ferazzutti, 2006 CanLII 44270 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Herman |
Divided success |
|
M v sr (f) |
Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2113 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Karakatsanis |
|
|
M v f (m) |
Butler v. Butler, 2007 CanLII 17023 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Mackinnon |
Motion for support, success divided |
|
M v m |
Kereluk v. Kereluk, 2004 CanLII 45467 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Polowin |
Divided success |
|
M v f |
Rawn v. Laviolette, 1998 CanLII 864 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Rutherford |
Divided success |
|
F v m (m) |
Dhanji v. Dhanji, 2004 CanLII 30090 (ON S.C.)
|
F |
Stewart |
Divorce action, husband successful party |
|
Fv m (f) |
Priolo v. Priolo, 2004 CanLII 7045 (ON S.C.)
|
F |
Stewart |
Divorce action, divided success |
|
F v f |
McDonald v. McDonald, 2005 CanLII 19808 (ON S.C.) |
F |
Tucker |
Wife successful, both parties spent over 75 K |
|
Sr v sr |
Cavic v. Carroccia, 2006 CanLII 28554 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Mixed resul, no costs |
|
M v m |
Guιvin v. Scantland, 2007 CanLII 5525 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Maranger |
Wife loses |
|
M v m |
Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Aston |
Most issues agreed before trial |
|
F (m) v m |
Ramdatt v. Ramdatt, 2004 CanLII 4016 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Campbell |
Wife has more success but fails to disclose financial infomation |
|
F v f |
Denley v. Denley, 2006 CanLII 1015 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belch |
Interim motion, no basis for costs |
|
M v sr (f) |
Oxley v. Oxley, 2004 CanLII 5070 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belleghem |
Motion and loco parentis trial |
|
F v f |
Nepaul v. Nepaul, 2004 CanLII 5067 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Belleghem |
Divorce action |
|
M v m |
Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 19446 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Cavarzan |
Divorce action, divided success |
|
M v m |
Surerus-Mills v. Mills, 2006 CanLII 42362 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Del Frate |
Support variation, applicant spent 52 K |
|
F v m (f) |
Dent v. Dent, 2004 CanLII 10442 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Fragomeni |
Variation, husband gets support reduced |
|
mvm |
Dafoe v. Dafoe, 2005 CanLII 28536 (ON S.C.) |
M |
G p smith |
No costs |
|
F v f |
Wedig v. Gaukel, 2007 CanLII 14349 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Mobility case |
|
M v m |
Hunter v. Hunter, 2005 CanLII 47756 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Gordon |
Wife failed to make submission in time |
|
M v m |
Millen v. Millen, 2004 CanLII 17769 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Application to terminate support, support reduced |
|
F v m(f) |
Hunter v. Hunter, 2005 CanLII 34580 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Gordon |
Wifes lawyer requesrs no costs and husbands doesnt answer |
|
M v sr (f) |
Desjardins v. Waters, 2006 CanLII 1203 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Graham |
Child support determination, divided success. |
|
Mv m |
Wagner v. Ottman, 2003 CanLII 2266 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Divided success, husbands motion for costs dismissed |
|
L v l |
Purvis v. Purvis, 2003 CanLII 18186 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
For husband to have to pay costs on top of ruling would be oppressive |
|
L v l |
Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 6234 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Hambly |
Divided success |
|
F v f |
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Maranger |
Divorce action, divided success, both parties spent a large amountof money |
|
F v f |
Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Pierce |
Interim motion mostly on consent, husband gets custody |
|
M v f (m) |
Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 6219 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Quinn |
Wife would of got costs but submitted a false financial statement |
|
M v m |
Anger v. Anger, 2004 CanLII 7572 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Quinn |
Interim motion to varycustody and access |
|
M v m |
Ellis v. Ellis, 2004 CanLII 33293 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R MacKinnon |
Husband gets custody and asks 42 K |
|
Sr v sr |
Lampron v. Lampron, 2006 CanLII 12427 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R Smith |
Interim motion , no costs |
|
M v m |
Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) |
M |
R Smith |
Motion to vary support |
|
L v l |
Baldwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 21282 (ON S.C.)
|
M |
Sachs |
Wife asks 66 K husband asks 150 K, divided success |
|
M v m |
Miller v. Miller, 2006 CanLII 30597 (ON S.C.) |
M |
Tulloch |
Success divided |