Superior Court Penalties

Regions and Judges of Ontario

Peter Karl Roscoe

Nov 2008

Contents

Page

Introduction 1

Summary of Penalties For All Regions 3

Eastern Region

Eastern Region Judicial Summary 6

Eastern Region Financial Data 7

Eastern Region Cases 8

Toronto Region

Toronto Region Judicial Summary 23

Toronto Region Financial Data 24

Toronto Region Cases 25

Central East Region

Central East Region Judicial Summary 42

Central East Region Financial Data 43

Central East Region Cases 44

Central South Region

Central South Region Judicial Summary 61

Central South Region Financial Data 62

Central South Region Cases 63

Central West Region

Central West Region Judicial Summary 78

Central West Region Financial Data 79

Central West Region Cases 80

page

Southwest Region

Southwest Region Region Judicial Summary 93

Southwest Region Region Financial Data 94

Southwest Region Region Cases 95

Northwest Region Region

Northwest Region Region Judicial Summary 104

Northwest Region Region Financial Data 105

Northwest Region Region Cases 106

Northeast Region

Northeast Region Judicial Summary 114

Northeast Region Financial Data 115

Northeast Region Cases 116

Conclusions

Regional Discrimination Indexes 122

Judicial Discrimination Indexes 124

Financial Data 126

Penalties Against Self Represented Litigants 129

Introduction

This study examines 13 potentially punitive measures which may be ordered by Ontario Superior Court judges in family divorce actions. All categories except cost penalties, comes from data collected between Jan 2000 to Oct 2006, on the Canlii legal network. Cost penalties data has been taken from a separate study which extended from Jan 2000 to Aug 2007. All cases which fit category criteria in the timespan have been included. The penalty categories evaluated in this study span most major aspects of divorce. Contempt and default primarily relate to the violation of court orders. They often lead to the imposition of other penalties. Imputed income, prejudgment interest, and lump sums, are representative of financial measures. Imputed income is generally connected with support determinations, and prejudgment interest with equalization. Supervised access reflects concerns regarding children. Added emphasis has been given by using the interim impact on children to assess major and minor penalization with regards to restraining orders and exclusive possession of the family home. Summary judgment and striking pleadings could be described as procedural issues. Cost determinations are made at most hearings. Usually the benefits of cost penalties are given to the party the judge determines to be the overall winner. Not all measures examined could be properly termed as penalties, but they all have the potential of leaving that impression on those whom they are imposed. Extreme applications could most certainly have a punitive quality. To facilitate analysis, penalties have been classified as major or minor. Although a small amount of interpretation must be used in classification, a list of criteria for eah penalty type is reproduced below. In general, it can be said that major penalties are those which most clearly have severe impact on an individual. Or those with the most negative potential on the outcome of the divorce. Total penalties show who received the most penalties and major penalties who received the worst. The one thing all penalties have in common is that they are imposed on divorcing litigants against their will. Consent agreements are not included unless the issue initially consented subsequently becomes contested.

Major and Minor Penalty Classification

Penalty		Minor Penalty	Major Penalty
Contempt	C	Purged, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty	Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome
Costs ( before appeal )	Cts
Interim Motion Costs		Less than 6.5 K	Greater than 6.5 K
Divorce Action Costs		Less than 15 K	Greater than 15 K
Post Divorce Action Costs		Less than 10 K	Greater than 10 K
Default	D	Set aside, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty	Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome, vesting or charging order
Exclusive Possession of the Family Home	Ep	Overturned, occupancy rent or equivalent payments, non custodial spouse gets the home, minor timespan until sale	Opposing spouse gets interim custody and interim possession of the home
Freezing	F	Removed, overturned on appeal, only against a minor asset, mutual orders	Major or all assets
Imputed Income	Ip	Overturned on appeal, less than 15 % of declared income, support recipient	Over 15 % of declared income
Lump Sum	L	Overturned on appeal, less than 5 K	Greater than 5 K
Prejudment Interest	Pr	Overturned on appeal, Less than 5 K	Greater than 5 K
Restraining Order ( excluding restrained from moving or changing childrens names )	Ro	Overturned on appeal, rescinded, mutual, restrained from moving	Includes children, issued or upheld by the family court, issued by other agency if it results in interim custody, or possession of the family home
Security ( excluding equalization held in trust for both parties )	Sc	Overturned on appeal, insurance policy less than 500 K, passports for access to children	Insurance policy greater than 500 K
Striking Pleadings	St	Overturned on appeal, minor issue or pleading only	All others
Summary Judgment	Js	Overturned on appeal, minor issue only	All others
Supervised Access	Sa	Overturned on appeal, varied before trial, supervised party gets joint or sole custody of children	All others

Penalties may be imposed at interim hearings, divorce trials, and in post divorce actions. Not all cases are reported on legal networks. Interim hearings especially are often underrepresented. . Rulings may sometimes be obtained from other appearances such as trials, variations, appeals, or defaults. The endorsement where the penalty is discussed is the reference given in the case summaries. Penalties were divided into regions by the assignment of the judge who made the rulings. It would appear there is some interregional mobility of judges. A few judges may have been reassigned from other districts, and others may of just been given temporary assignments. Judges who have retired but were active during the time period are included. The nature of legal networks is such that they try to include a full range of examples. This means that most unusual or extreme cases are recorded. The result is that minor penalties may be under reported, but most major penalties should be represented. Since penalties against females are less common it is likely that they are mostly reported. Case summaries for all the data used in this study may be found after the judicial and financial data for each region. Conclusions follow on page .

Data Summary

MJ = Male Judge FJ = Female Judge

	Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
Region	# Male Judges	# M J Rulings	# Female Judges	# F J Rulings	# Male Judges	# M J Rulings	# Female Judges	# F J Rulings
Eastern
Total Penalties	20	86	10	154	7	12	5	18
Major Penalties	15	46	10	102	1	1	2	4
Toronto
Total Penalties	16	73	24	203	5	6	11	29
Major Penalties	15	55	23	155	1	2	3	9
Central East
Total Penalties	17	122	9	104	9	23	7	14
Major Penalties	14	82	9	85	8	13	4	6
Central South
Total Penalties	25	192	5	19	12	44	2	3
Major Penalties	23	122	5	13	9	15	1	1
Central West
Total Penalties	13	117	6	65	12	30	5	22
Major Penalties	13	75	6	46	4	4	2	8
South West
Total Penalties	15	95	6	31	8	22	4	10
Major Penalties	14	59	6	17	3	4	2	2
North West
Total Penalties	9	77	1	23	9	25	1	8
Major Penalties	9	39	1	14	6	9	1	3
North East
Total Penalties	8	44	3	22	7	11	4	5
Major Penalties	7	30	2	13	1	5	1	2
Total Penalties	123	806	64	621	69	173	39	109
Major Penalties	110	509	63	445	33	53	16	35

Penalties Against Men

	Type of Penalty
Region	C	Cts	D	Ep	F	Ip	Js	L	Pr	Ro	Sa	Sc	St
Eastern
Total Penalties	6	76	12	9	9	32	2	18	9	25	12	20	10
Major Penalties	2	33	8	6	7	27	2	16	4	16	11	7	8
Toronto
Total Penalties	8	70	14	12	13	56	5	23	10	16	4	36	7
Major Penalties	7	41	10	8	11	53	5	22	5	10	3	23	7
Central East
Total Penalties	3	55	12	8	8	36	5	17	6	23	14	25	15
Major Penalties	2	28	9	7	7	34	4	13	1	17	12	20	14
Central South
Total Penalties	1	90	5	13	4	25	3	14	9	15	15	13	1
Major Penalties	0	43	4	8	5	23	2	14	4	12	12	5	1
Central West
Total Penalties	2	43	7	6	15	41	4	19	7	14	7	17	1
Major Penalties	2	24	4	4	6	38	3	14	2	6	6	12	1
South West
Total Penalties	3	28	4	3	3	19	2	26	3	10	4	19	3
Major Penalties	3	10	3	1	2	17	2	21	1	4	3	6	2
North West
Total Penalties	2	26	3	8	8	9	2	8	3	12	2	17	1
Major Penalties	1	7	3	6	6	6	2	5	3	8	2	5	1
North East
Total Penalties	0	15	7	4	2	15	1	7	2	5	1	7	0
Major Penalties	0	6	7	4	0	12	1	6	1	3	1	3	0
Total Penalties	27	402	64	63	62	233	24	132	49	120	59	154	38
Major Penalties	17	192	48	44	44	210	21	111	26	76	50	81	34

Penalties Against Women

	Type of Penalty
Region	C	Cts	D	Ep	F	Ip	Js	L	Pr	Ro	Sa	Sc	St
Eastern
Total Penalties	2	14	2	1	2	3	0	0	0	3	1	1	1
Major Penalties	0	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
Toronto
Total Penalties	1	13	4	1	6	2	0	0	0	4	1	1	2
Major Penalties	0	4	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	2
Central East
Total Penalties	2	17	0	1	3	8	0	1	0	3	2	0	0
Major Penalties	2	8	0	1	2	2	0	1	0	2	2	0	0
Central South
Total Penalties	2	27	0	3	1	6	0	0	0	7	0	0	1
Major Penalties	1	11	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	1
Central West
Total Penalties	5	16	0	3	13	4	1	0	0	8	3	0	0
Major Penalties	3	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0
South West
Total Penalties	3	11	0	0	0	7	4	0	0	2	1	0	0
Major Penalties	1	2	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
North West
Total Penalties	0	14	1	1	1	2	2	1	2	5	2	1	1
Major Penalties	0	3	0	0	0	1	2	1	0	2	1	0	1
North East
Total Penalties	1	5	0	0	2	5	0	0	1	0	0	1	1
Major Penalties	1	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	0
Total Penalties	16	117	7	10	28	37	7	2	3	32	10	4	6
Major Penalties	8	37	0	3	5	8	4	2	1	9	7	0	4

Eastern Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region E - Eastern Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Aiken	F	E	33	13	20	9	2	1	0	0
Blishen	F	E	25	12	20	10	2	0	0	0
De Sousa	F	E	33	16	26	14	6	0	2	0
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Mackinnon J	F	E	38	9	20	3	7	0	2	0
Metivier	F	E	10	5	3	1	0	0	0	0
Polowin	F	E	6	2	2	0	1	1	0	0
Robertson	F	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Toscano Roccano	F	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Trousdale	F	E	5	5	5	5	0	0	0	0
Belch	M	E	9	4	6	2	1	0	0	0
Chadwick	M	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Charboneau	M	E	3	1	3	1	1	0	0	0
Cosgrove	M	E	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Cusson	M	E	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Hackland	M	E	5	0	3	0	2	0	0	0
Kealy	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Lalonde	M	E	9	6	7	5	4	3	1	0
Mackinnon C	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Macleod	M	E	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Manton	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Maranger	M	E	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Panet	M	E	6	3	2	2	1	0	0	0
Pedlar	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Power	M	E	16	10	9	5	0	0	0	0
Roy	M	E	4	4	2	2	0	0	0	0
Rutherford	M	E	9	4	4	3	2	0	0	0
Sedgwick	M	E	5	2	4	2	0	0	0	0
Sheffield	M	E	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Smith R	M	E	6	2	1	0	1	1	1	1

Female Judges	10	154	62	102	44	18	2	4	0
Male judges	20	86	40	46	24	12	4	1	1
Total	30	240	103	146	68	30	6	5	1

Eastern Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 16 Mean = 47.4 Total = 758.4

3.300 4.100 5.400 6.000 8.000 8.000 10.00 23.00 36.00 40.00 42.00 45.00 52.00 54.00 57.00 365.0

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 28 Mean = 43.8 Total = 1226.2

2.000 5.600 8.000 11.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 18.00 25.00 25.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 33.00 40.00 40.00 45.00 47.00 50.00 61.60 68.00 69.00 85.00 94.00 97.00 115.0 132.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 78 Mean = 12.3 Total = 978.9

0.5000 0.8000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.800 3.800 3.800 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.100 4.300 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 5.700 5.800 6.500 6.500 7.500 7.500 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.000 9.600 9.700 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.10 15.00 15.00 17.00 18.00 18.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 25.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 36.90 40.00 40.00 49.00 50.70 60.90 95.00

Female Cost Penalties

N = 14 Mean = 13.4 Total = 187.6

1.000 1.300 1.500 3.000 4.500 4.800 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 10.00 20.00 46.00 70.00

Eastern Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Aitken	F	E	M	M	Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	Man claims 125 K income and is imputed to 171 by Mackinnon J and 150 K by Aitken J, 4.8 K per month total support
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, she is denied exclusive possession but family home is vested to her
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt $ 500 fine
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs of motion
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Man declared 2 K income imputed to 15 K, man claims to be disabled but court finds he has a cash business
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Woman owes man equalization but his income imputed and his equalization held as security for child support payments, unemployed, denied spousal support
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	36.0	36 K lump sum for spousal support
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest on equalization
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must maintain a 100 K life insurance policy, also freezing order by Brennan J
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Cameron v. MacGillivray, 2005 CanLII 47696 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest on 12 K equalization
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Doherty v. Wilcox, 2007 CanLII 5527 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Support variation, divided success, wife asks 8.3 K and gets 4 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K cost award for divorce trial, 5 K for 2 interim cost awards also
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	J.R. v. J.G., 2005 CanLII 14983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order for threatening, police assistance in retrieving items refused, mans contempt motion dismissed as he violated court orders, aceess to son suspended until he has counselling
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21 K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	40.0	40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 215 ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Jonas v. Jonas, 2003 CanLII 1967 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	22.5	Divorce action 2 day trial, husbands pleadings struck, 22.5 K costs
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		No more motions until payments are made
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	8.0	Lump sums of 4.5 K and 3.5 K for costs and arrears of support, didn’t make equalization payment of 15 K, support 2 K per month total, no more motions until support is paid, wife allowed to move to Nova Scotia with children
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man gets 18 month restraining order for assault, says wife assaulted him too, wife gets custody, allowed to move to Nova Scotia
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim possession of the family home, man must pay $ 1325 child support and $ 500 spousal support retroactive
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 196 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Interim motion, wife asks 5.9 K and gets 3.8 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	42.0	Lump sum 42 K for child support, pleadings struck, 15 K equalization and 15 K constructive trust
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man given supervised access with conditions for unsupervised, conditions never met, no more contact, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, custody to wife no access order made, lump sum and imputation
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.1	Wife asks 95.1 K for divorce action And gets 12 K for post appeal motion
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Man claims 27 K and is imputed to 40 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Man retrains and is intentionally unemployed and imputed at former level of 33 K, arrears
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 25768 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Motion to vary support, wife asks for 8.7 K and gets 5 K costs
Aitken	F	E	M	sr	Testa v. Basi, 2005 CanLII 25186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	4.0	Man bankrupted and living in trailer is imputed from 21 K to 25 K per year
Aitken	F	E	sr	sr	TPS	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	69.0	2K per month spousal support, 40 K arrears, man claims 101 K income and is imputed to 170 K
Blishen	F	E	ex	F	Ahern v. Ahern, 2007 CanLII 37672 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	$ 1762 per month child support, $ 270 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses and retroactive support of 35.9 K, 5 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man given non depletion order, 9 K per month total support, interim disbursement of 20 K to wife
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	94.0	Man declared 228 K imputed to 322 K, 9 K per month retroactive
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2005 CanLII 7660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Wife claims 19.5 K for interim support motion and gets 12 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Cutillas v. Proulx, 2001 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 3 years
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, 3.1 K per month child support and 1.7 K per month spousal support
Blishen	F	E	F	M	Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 42254 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion, Wife claims 8.4 K and gets 4 K
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Ro		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Sa		Man charged with assault given supervised access at interim motion and trial
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Sc		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502kim	mj	Ep		Man charged with assault, wife gets exclusive possession and interim custody, house transferred to wife at uncontested trial
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order to secure child support arrears not rescinded
Blishen	F	E	M	M	N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	Interim motion to strike pleadings, 2.5 K costs, previous interim motion for custody, 5.5 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	M	N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Pleadings not struck but made to sign disclosure release
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck and his defense is disallowed including a constitutional challenge
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Piskor v. Piskor, 2004 CanLII 5023 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.0	Support variation, 18 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	27.0	Man declares 36 K and court imputes 63 K
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Stratton v. Kangas, 2001 CanLII 26440 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man on welfare is imputed to 28 K
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Stratton v. Kangas, 2002 CanLII 46690 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Wife sucessful on 2 out of 3 issues, 3.5 K partial indemnity asked and gets 2 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Mans 26 K income imputed to 41 K, sexual assault on child allegations unproven, supervised access
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, wife gets custody and asks access terminated, first unsupervised, then by parents, then supervised access center ordered, wife makes sexual assault allegation
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans supervised access is continued, mother asks it be terminated, criminal record, ron stewart, child support increased
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Zlater v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 30664 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.6	Motion for university expense, 9.6 K costs, ruling better than offer to settle
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Biraben v. Pelland, 2006 CanLII 25614 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man accused of assault allowed supervised access with grandparent, wife gets custody
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	18.5	Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears, 18.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	D		Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 200 K income and is imputed to 240 K, 8 K per month support
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 1920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Interim motion for possession of home and leave to appeal, 3.5 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Davis v Morris 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	D		Motion to overturn ex parte default order striking pleadings dismissed, overturned on appeal
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 8635 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Man achieves substancial success on motion to vary but wife gven 10 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Pleadings struck, freezing order
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Pleadings struck, freezing order
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife allowed to move to japan
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, Childrens Aid orders no access, court then orders supervised access, wife given custody and allowed to move to Japan
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2005 CanLII 7663 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	Divorce action, wife allowed to move to Japan, 15 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, then threats, hasn’t seen son in 2 years, acess denied
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Charged with assault, plead guilty, harassment charges, wife denies access, supervised access at wifes discretion ordered, wife requests access terminated
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody
De Sousa	F	E	Sr	F	Martin v. Martin, 2007 CanLII 8638 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Support variation,40 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	365.0	Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2003 CanLII 1918 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	36.9	Divorce action, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 36.9 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	P.S. v. J.S., 2005 CanLII 16590 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order for assault, false sexual assault allegations, joint custody changed to sole custody to man
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 3.5 K per month spousal support, variation stayed until arrears paid
De Sousa	F	E	F	F	R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C	mj	L	10.0	10 K lumps sum compensatory support
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, 36 K in cost arrears, child support default with FRO, refused variation
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	45.0	Man with no income and heavy stock losses imputed to 45 K and support set at 54 K
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets restraining order from false assault allegations, man acquitted, court gives wife permanent restraining roorder, strikes pleadings, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally unemployed
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial,
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Scott v. McKinley, 2002 CanLII 13273 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Man gets only one supervised visit per year with his child, access increased to 3 times on appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Surrette v. Johnson, 2003 CanLII 2282 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Support variation, divided success, 1 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	Motion for leave to appeal, 9 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Husband did not include imputed income on notice of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access continued
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	M	F	Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, wife gets interim custody
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	M	F	Wylie v. Leclair, 2003 CanLII 49737 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	1.0	1K trial costs changed to 11 K but man gets 3 K costs of appeal, 150 K unjust enrichment award reduced to 70 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 27600 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.0	Uncontested trial judgement against wife set aside, 17 K costs against husband and his lawyer
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	132.0	Mans declared income of 43 K imputed to 175 K, 2.85 K per month total support, security deposit
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, mans motion for summary judgment denied, 2 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motions, 2 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	5.6	Man claims 6.9 K income and is imputed to 12.5 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	4.1	Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	F. v. V., 2002 CanLII 2767 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	95.0	Divorce action, wife asks for 158 K and gets 95 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Gomez v. Bartusch, 2003 CanLII 37828 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Summary judgment denied, 3.5 K costs of motion
Mackinnon j	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	47.0	Man claims 55 K imputed to 102 K.
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc	47.0	Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.
Mackinnon j	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 15397 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Divorce action, wife asks 35 K and gets 25 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed to 100 K reset at trial
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed from 80 K to 100 K reset at trial
Mackinnon J	F	E	Sr	M	Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Properties transferred to wife for sale
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Contempt motion, 3.5 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	Sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs by Trousdale J
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Likins v. MacKenzie, 2004 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Divorce action. Arbitrators cost award of 110 K reduced to 67 K, 10 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	Mavis v. Mavis, 2005 CanLII 14002 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization at a lower rate
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	N.(D.) v. E.(T.), 2000 CanLII 21156 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wife wins trial of custody and gets 6.5 K costs, asks for 10 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.8	$ 1750 for 2 interim motions to set aside and leave to appeal the order of Byers J
Mackinnon J	F	E	Ex	L	Pelda v. O'Leary, 2006 CanLII 25536 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets ex parte freezing order, man sells company and may be able to pay more spousal support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	52.0	Woman has pension entitlement from separation agreement and man goes bankrupt, claim not defeated by bankruptcy, 52 K lump sum for equalization and support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Freezing order on RRSP until lump sum is paid
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Pre judgment interest on 52 K award
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Silver v. Mercer, 2003 CanLII 2039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.3	Wife gets 4.3 K for motion to set support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Simpkins v. Simpkins, 2004 CanLII 28909 (ON C.A.)	mn	Sc		Mintes of settlement waving spousal support set aside for fraud, 2.3 K spousal support, man must designate wife as beneficiary of 200 K life insurance policy, 12 K costs of appeal.
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	sr	Smith v. Smith, 2000 CanLII 22455 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.6	1.6 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans 8 K bank account to be preserved and not depleted, contempt for depletion
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	57 K lump sum against past arrears claim
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	115.0	Man claims 35 K on taxes and is imputed to 150 K income
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	23.0	23 K lump sum for retroactive arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		45 K GIC for security
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	L	Westendorp v. Westendorp, 2000 CanLII 22538 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	8 K costs for constitutional challenge, 4 K to wife and 4 K to FRO
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	3.3	Lump sum of 3.3 K for s.7 expenses, wife found in contempt for not selling house
Metivier	F	E	sr	M	Boileau v. Boileau, 2003 CanLII 2288 (ON S.C	mn	Sc		Secure support against life insurance policy or first charge on estate, 69 K of pension transferred to wife, $ 600 support, mild
Metivier	F	E	ex	M	Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	8.0	8 K costs of striking motion, varied to $ 750 on appeal, 6 K costs of appeal against wife.
Metivier	F	E	exr	M	Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Mans pleading struck at ex parte hearing, overturned on appeal
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	54.0	54 K lump sum including 20 K for spousal support and child support arrears and special expenses, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, life insurance policy for security
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man convicted of assault, anger management courses, joint custody with primary residence to wife, paid 380 K equalization, 20 K lump sum retroactive spousal support arrears, 34 K retroactive child support arrears, 1.1 K per month child support
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy for security, 54 K lump sum, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, joint custody
Metivier	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 42 K lump sum child support
Metrivier	F	E	M	M	Glance v. Glance, 2000 CanLII 20393 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Metrivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Additional 50 K per year income imputed, retroactive support, s.7 expenses, lump sum arrears
Metrivier	F	E	sr	M	O'Brien v. Griffin, 2004 CanLII 10709 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	61.6	Man claims 51.4 K income and is imputed to 115 K, 100 K arrears, vexatious litigant order, new trial of support ordered on appeal
Polowin	F	E	F	sr	Brazeau v. Lefebvre, 2003 CanLII 2165 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Self represented wife gets 5 K costs
Polowin	F	E	sr	M	Fequet v. Petelka Fequet, 2003 CanLII 2200 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.7	Divorce action, husband asks for 21 K and wife gets 9.7 K
Polowin	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.5	$ 500 for interim motion
Polowin	F	E	F	M	Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	8.0	8 K lump sum for support
Polowin	F	E	M	F	Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.4	Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest
Polowin	F	E	M	F	Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest
Robertson	F	E	sr	M	A. E. M. v. J. E. M., 2004 CanLII 22310 (ON C.A.)	mn	Ro		Restrianing order against man, 1.5 K costs of appeal
Robertson	F	E	M	M	Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, sentenced to jail for contempt previously ordered by Dunbar K
Toscano Roccano	F	E	M	M	Lakhani v. Lakhani, 2003 CanLII 2160 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	9 K to wife for motion
Toscano Romano	F	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 1.5 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	68.0	2 K income imputed to 70 K, pleadings struck, wife gets exclusive possession of home then vesting order, 1.3 K per month total support
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		2 lump sum payments already made, 40 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K in retroactive spousal support, 53 K equalization and vesting order for house, 40 K costs, restraining order, pleadings struck
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Domestic assault, temporary retraining order still in effect, pleadings struck, 40 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, supervised access, hasn’t seen children, pleadings struck, imputed income, 45 K retroactive support, 35 K cost penalty
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	97.0	Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	6.0	6 K lump sum for retroactive support,
Belch	M	E	M	F	Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Wife asks 11 K and gets 3.5 K for support / income determination motion
Belch	M	E	sr	M	M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man on unemployment imputed at 40 K per year
Belch	M	E	sr	M	M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Plead guilty to assaulting kids, minimal supervised access with unspecified increased, imputed income
Belch	M	E	M	M	McCaw v. McCaw, 2007 CanLII 6920 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	35.0	Divorce action, wife asks 69 K gets 35 K costs
Belch	M	E	L	L	Murano, Re, 2004 CanLII 17633 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jailed for disclosure, denied a trial FRO default set to trial, owes 158 K
Belch	M	E	sr	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man in contempt for not signing over house to wife and depleting bank account, Feb 2005 post trial motion
Belch	M	E	sr	sr	Young v. O'Neil, 2003 CanLII 2370 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Granted as after separation man leaves phone messages and goes in house to take photos as evidence of differential living standards, income imputed
Chadwick	M	E	sr	M	Fisher v. Fisher, 2003 CanLII 2119 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Mans contempt sufficiently purged
Chadwick	M	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Contempt, man gets 120 days and new wife gets 60 days in jail, fraudulent conveyance
Charbonneau	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jail threatened, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, assets frozen
Charbonneau	M	E	L	L	Poirier v. Poirier, 2006 CanLII 2188 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	36.0	Divorce, 36 K costs
Charbonneau	M	E	M	M	Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Divorce action 34 K costs
Cosgrove	M	E	M	M	Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 4 years, 11 interim orders
Cosgrove	M	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K costs
Cusson	M	E	sr	M	Donaldson v. Dénommée, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year, 8 K costs
Cusson	M	E	L	L	Lavigne v. MacCaskill, 2003 CanLII 2014 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife falsely alleges assault and theft, child testifies wife is abusive, joint custody
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 2.3 K per month child support
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	8.0	Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild
Hackland	M	E	M	M	K. v. K., 2004 CanLII 12506 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody, 15 K per month child support
Hackland	M	E	M	F	Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Mans declared income is 12 K but is imputed to 43 K
Hackland	M	E	M	M	Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum
Kealy	M	E	M	F	Aukstuolyte v. Balchun, 2005 CanLII 27896 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	Bourgon v. Paquette, 2004 CanLII 5924 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	18.0	$ 500 per month interim spousal support, settled intention on children reserved for trial, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, man claims 47 K income imputed to 65 K, wife has 45 K income
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	Harris v. Harris, 2000 CanLII 17048 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Second mortgage ordered put on mans property and assigned to wife for 5 K per month support, stay denied
Lalonde	M	E	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty, previous 12K cost penalty
Lalonde	M	E	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	11.0	11 K costs for motion
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	85.0	Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, lawyer quits, man has answered but is not present
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
Mackinnon C	M	E	L	L	M.P. v. D.P., 2006 CanLII 15770 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife makes false sexual assualt allegations and man gets temporary supervised access, restored to unsupervised when allegations are dismissed, child exchanges at the police station
Macleod	M	E	F	M	Sanders v. Lacaille, 2005 CanLII 18722 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man accused of assault acquitted, no children, wife gets possession of home for 2 years and damages it when ordered to leave, wife given 40 K in constructive trust but must pay 14 K in damages and 14 K in occupation rent
Manton	M	E	M	M	D.Q. v. R.A., 2006 CanLII 42375 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.1	4.1 K for earlier motion, unemployed man imputed to 40 K
Maranger	M	E	sr	sr	Ainslie v. Bracken, 2006 CanLII 19461 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed from claimed K to 80 K, 10 K support arrears, 3.4 K per month total support
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Man in breach of several paymwent orders, pleadings struck, security ordered for appeal of striking order, uncontested trial ordered
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2120 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wifes motion for retroactive support, wife claims 44 K gets 6.5 K
Panet	M	E	M	M	Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild
Panet	M	E	M	M	Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	Interim motion, 7.5 K costs
Panet	M	E	M	F	Meredith v. Meredith, 2002 CanLII 2807 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Divorce action, divided success, wife gets 3.8 K
Pedlar	M	E	M	M	Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man under no contact order with one of his 3 children
Power	M	E	M	M	Campeau v. Campeau, 2006 CanLII 19430 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K for motion to have mans lawyer removed
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 15761 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.5	Wife claims 16.5 K and gets 8.5 K for motion
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Child support arrears and threat of bankruptcy, order to put pension in trust until equalization paid
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	Interim motion $ 750 costs
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Secure equalization against life insurance policy and make wife trustee of pension, retroactive child support
Power	M	E	M	M	Graff v. Graff, 2002 CanLII 2788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Interim motion, 3.8 K costs
Power	M	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 38129 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Garnishment hearing, 4 K costs
Power	M	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Freezes home and possessions impressed with a trust to benefit of wife. His mothers estate frozen and transferred to trust, garnisheed to 70 % income
Power	M	E	ex	M	Laiken v. Tatsambong, 2003 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wife gets ex parte freezing order which is later overturned
Power	M	E	M	F	Martin v. Martin, 2004 CanLII 48712 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must hold at least 1 million dollars life insurance designated to wife for payments of 28 K per month in total support
Power	M	E	M	F	Martin v. Martin, 2005 CanLII 11809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	49.0	Divorce action, wife asks 165 K and gets 49 K
Power	M	E	sr	sr	McLean v. Vallance, 2006 CanLII 28910 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Wife claims 4.9 K and gets 1 K
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		5 K security to bring motion, vexatious, frivoluos abusive litigator, 10 K cost penalty , variation not heard despite FRO default, security overturned on appeal
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Support variation, 10 K costs, 10 K costs of appeal
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on mans motion for variarion and access and constitutional challenges
Power	M	E	sr	F	Townsend v. Florentis, 2004 CanLII 25801 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man prohibited from the city of Kingston, no access to child
Roy	M	E	sr	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	50.7	Divorce action, wife asks 61 K gets 50.7 K
Roy	M	E	sr	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	11.0	Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 21 K
Roy	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs for motions
Roy	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		12 K arrears on house payments and 25 K costs to be secured against mans share of home
Rutherford	M	E			Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Contempt motion against man dismissed 1.5 K for motion
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion 3 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	F	Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default but FRO enforcement stayed and arrears reduced to 15 K from 44
Rutherford	M	E	sr	F	Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		15 K advance to wife and 9.5 K in costs but answer not struck for failing to provide disclosure
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	Interim motion on support application wife didn’t pay costs of precious order, 7.5 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Stay of variation until man pays arrears, says he’s broke
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Provenzano v. Provenzano, 2004 CanLII 5075 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Set aside, womans lawyer doesn’t tell of ex parte order, lawyer pays costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motion 2 K costs
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Sedgwick	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order against man, wife gets possession of home and cistody
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Lump sum of 45 K ordered in Que, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and Ont court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	45.0	Lump sum of 45 K ordered, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied
Sedgwick	M	E	sr	M	Roberts v. Aasen, 2003 CanLII 2000 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	60.9	Custody and access 60.9 K award
Sheffield	M	E	M	F	Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K for interim motion
Sheffield	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motion, 2 K costs
Sheffield	M	E	M	F	Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	9.0	Man claims 83 K income and is imputed to 92 K
Smith R	M	E	L	L	Bourget v. Bourget, 2006 CanLII 2888 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	2.0	Mans income imputed upwards 2 K per year for overtime, minor
Smith R	M	E	M	M	Butler v. Poelstra, 2006 CanLII 41661 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.7	Divorce action, wife asks 16.3 K and gets 5.7 K costs
Smith R	M	E	F	M	Fournier v. Burton, 2006 CanLII 42370 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Husband loses motion to have support terminated, 4 K costs
Smith R	M	E	sr	F	Francis v. Filion, 2003 CanLII 2423 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		40 K insurance policy as support
Smith R	M	E	F	M	Matysiak v. Phillips, 2004 CanLII 45449 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans access terminated, first unsupervised, then supervised, then terminated, drug problem, criminal record
Smith R	M	E	sr	F	Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.8	Motion to vary support, 5.8 K costs

2) Penalties Against Women

Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, Wife gets home for 2 years then sold, man gets 12 K bill on household payments, woman gets support
Aitken	F	E	sr	sr	TPS	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual, woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,
Blishen	F	E	F	F	O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2007 CanLII 8930 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Motion to vary support, husband claims 19.8 K and gets 5 K, wife claims 8.4 K
DeSousa	F	E	F	F	A.D. v. M.J., 2006 CanLII 37515 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Motion, wife found in contempt, 8 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	F	F	Ladisa v. Ladisa, 2004 CanLII 15138 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, wife claims 35 K costs, husband claims 28 K and gets 10 K, appeal dismissed
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife get custody
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2003 CanLII 1995 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20K costs, 8.8 K costs of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Sloss v. Forget, 2005 CanLII 4843 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Motion for mobility and support, 6 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	F	M	Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 11238 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.0	Support trial, 7 K costs
Mackinnon	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Found in contempt for failure to sell house but not in contempt for not admitting child was not in school and collecting support, sentencing hearing to be held
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	D.W. v. C.O, 2006 CanLII 16361 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Child support application, 3 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	D.W. v. C.O., 2006 CanLII 13554 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	5.0	With a former income of 134 K and current declared income of 33 K given transitional imputation of 38 K then 62 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	Griffore v. Adsett, 2001 CanLII 28207 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Man gets exclusive possession and $ 1000 child support and $ 700 spousal support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2005 CanLII 48697 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.8	Motion to vary support, husband gets 4.8 K
Polowin	F	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	St		Woman who didn’t answers has pleadings struck, but decision is overturned
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	50.0	Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild
Charboneau	M	E	F	M	Guénette v. Brisebois, 2004 CanLII 33294 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Husband gets interim custody, divided success, 3 motions 1 K costs to be paid by wife
Hackland	M	E	M	M	Charron v. Fulham, 2004 CanLII 17656 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	4.5 K costs on child support variation
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	25.0	Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Pleadings struck then set aside, suit with lawyers
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	46.0	46 K for uncontested divorce action, set aside
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wife pleadings struck, sells property and husband files fraudulent conveyance action, sale reversed then order set aside
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody
Panet	M	E	F	M	Nicholls v. Peterson, 2007 CanLII 43497 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.3	$1,250 for uncontested trial, womans pleadings struck, 2 other $ 500 cost penalties
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Contempt motion for disclosure dismissed, 1.5 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Denied motion for support due to default on costs, overturned and her motion may proceed
Smith R	M	E	M	sr	Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	70 K costs against wife

Toronto Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region T – Toronto Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Backhouse	F	T	18	6	17	6	1	0	0	0
Bain	F	T	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Beaulieu	F	T	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Benotto	F	T	9	3	7	2	4	2	4	2
Croll	F	T	10	4	6	2	3	0	0	0
Goodman	F	T	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Greer	F	T	29	11	22	9	4	2	2	2
Herman	F	T	9	2	5	2	1	1	0	0
Himel	F	T	9	4	7	4	1	0	0	0
Karakatsanis	F	T	12	2	10	2	1	0	1	0
Kitely	F	T	9	1	7	1	0	0	0	0
Klowak	F	T	3	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Lax	F	T	7	0	6	0	0	0	0	0
Low	F	T	7	4	4	2	1	0	1	0
Macdonald	F	T	14	1	8	1	5	0	0	0
McWatt	F	T	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Mesbur	F	T	16	2	14	2	7	1	1	0
Pepall	F	T	4	0	4	0	0	0	0	0
Sachs	F	T	17	3	12	2	0	0	0	0
Speigel	F	T	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Stewart	F	T	12	2	10	1	0	0	0	0
Swinton	F	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Young	F	T	3	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
Thorburn	F	T	2	2	1	1	1	0	0	0
Archibald	M	T	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Aston	M	T	18	4	12	2	5	3	2	2
Belobaba	M	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Brown	M	T	5	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Clark	M	T	6	2	4	2	0	0	0	0
Czurtin	M	T	3	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
Day	M	T	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Ferrier	M	T	2	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Grossi	M	T	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hoilett	M	T	5	4	5	4	0	0	0	0
Jarvis	M	T	6	5	4	4	0	0	0	0
Jennings	M	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Keenan	M	T	2	2	2	2	1	0	0	0
OConnell	M	T	6	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Paisley	M	T	10	2	9	2	0	0	0	0
Spence	M	T	4	2	3	1	0	0	0	0

Female Judges	24	203	50	155	39	30	7	9	4
Male judges	16	73	22	54	17	7	3	2	2
Total	40	276	72	209	56	37	10	11	6

Toronto Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 22 Mean = 82.1 Total = 1806.8

1.800 5.000 12.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 26.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 43.00 50.00 57.00 57.00 93.00 101.0 180.0 200.0 350.0 447.0

Male Imputed Income missing 6

N = 51 Mean = 215.6 Total = 10995.6

4.000 8.000 11.00 12.00 14.00 15.00 18.00 21.00 23.00 28.00 28.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 33.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 46.00 46.00 48.00 49.00 49.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 55.00 55.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 60.00 60.00 61.00 68.00 77.00 77.00 79.00 87.00 100.0 155.0 170.0 190.0 250.0 305.0 309.0 1120. 1900. 4755

Male Cost Penalties

N = 69 Mean = 51.8 Total = 3574.2

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.100 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 3.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 6.200 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.500 7.500 10.00 10.80 12.00 12.50 13.50 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.80 16.50 17.00 17.80 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 33.80 34.00 35.00 42.00 45.00 56.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 85.80 93.00 200.0 2250

Female Cost Penalties

N = 13 Mean = 10.4 Total = 135.5

1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 3.500 3.500 4.000 4.250 5.500 8.000 18.00 25.00 56.00

Toronto Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income or cost penalty ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

		T	sr	M	Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man found in contempt purges it by providing some documents ordered
		T	F	M	Kucyi v. Kucyi, 2007 ONCA 758 (CanLII)	mj	Cts	20.0	$ 1709 per month child support and $ 2700 per month spousal support, appeal dismissed and new arbitration award to be made, 47 K arrears, 20 K costs
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Allaire v. Allaire, 2003 CanLII 26263 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	35.0	35 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, upheld on appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr	F	Ballentine v. Ballentine, 2001 CanLII 28151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	7.5 K costs for dismissed motion to vary support, man declared a vextacious litigant, 307 K arrears, 6.2 K costs of appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	C		2 months in jail for failure to pay security and dissipating assets, appeal dismissed
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Order freezing some of mans assets continued
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	4755.0	Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	2250.0	Wife asks for 2.6 million and gets 2.25 million for divorce
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 2.4 million prejudgment interest
Backhouse	F	T	L	L	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2003 CanLII 2190 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		18 K from proceeds of home to be paid into court as security
Backhouse	F	T	sr	L	Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Security for 105 K equalization as a mortgage, husbands share of family home transferred to wife.
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs for motion to change support
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	LeVan v. LeVan, 2006 CanLII 31020 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	170.0	Man claims a maximum of 200 K income and is imputed to 370 K, separation agreement reopened and equalization redone due to incomplete disclosure
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	10 K costs
Backhouse	F	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non dissapation order
Backhouse	F	T	L	F	Nordin v. Joslin, 2005 CanLII 14004 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	Cts	6.2	6.2 K for support reduction motion and 5 K for appeal
Backhouse	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2367 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 10 K security, appeal dismissed
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession, $ 1325 in child support and spousal support per month
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Tannahill v. Tannahill, 2005 CanLII 51025 (ON C.A.)	mj	D		Default leads to 30 K lump sum order, denied appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.5	Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal
Bain	F	T	M	M	Demarchi v. Selwyn, 2002 CanLII 2722 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	93.0	93 K lump sum made credited towards monthly payments
Bain	F	T	sr	M	DeMarco v. DeMarco, 2005 CanLII 6389 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Beaulieu	F	T	M	M	Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	42.0	Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs
Beaulieu	F	T	M	M	Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Cutaia-Mahler v. Mahler, 2001 CanLII 28138 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K for motion to vary support
Benotto	F	T	M	F	Davis v. Nusca, 2003 CanLII 2301 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion, leave to appeal denied, mother move to Sweden with children in interim
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Evans v. Gravely, 2000 CanLII 22593 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	23.0	Man claims 17 K taxablre income and is imputed to 40 K
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20 K costs and interest
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	14.0	14 K lump sum retroactive support and prejudgment interest
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		14 K lump sum retroactive support and pre judgment interest
Benotto	F	T	M	M	P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007
Benotto	F	T	M	M	P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007
Benotto	F	T			Stanghi v. Stanghi, 2001 CanLII 5784 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims no income and is imputed to 40 K, variation denied, appeal dismissed with costs
Croll	F	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mn	Cts	1.0	1 K costs of motion
Croll	F	T	sr		Hartman 2005	mj	Ip
Croll	F	T	M	F	Murray v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 30304 (ON C.A.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets retroactive support and prejudgment interest and costs, overturned on appeal
Croll	F	T	M	F	Parker v. Parker, 2004 CanLII 14179 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Interim motion for custody and support, wife gets 5 K
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	15.0	3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	77.0	3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Charging order over home and cottage as security for support
Croll	F	T	M	L	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order
Croll	F	T	sr	F	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		20 K security with court for compliance with order, wife says husband abused her, gets sole custody to move to Japan
Croll	F	T	sr	M	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON SC)	mj	L	43.0	Lump of 43 K for past arrears of 80 K, alienated from son who won’t see him, must get life insurance designated to son until son turns 27
Goodman	F	T	M	M	Nolan v. MacLean, 2006 CanLII 38865 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default on support, payment as a lump sum with interest
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	Man must rollover 57 K of pension in lump sum to wife
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Rose v. Rose, 2005 CanLII 46401 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		May not encumber deplete or sell business
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	51.0	Man is unemployed, imputed to 51 K per year
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Proceeds from sale of home ordered as security for support
Greer	F	T	M	F	Brans v. Brans, 2000 CanLII 22471 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	250.0	Man claims maximum income of 200 K and is imputed to 450 K
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man must transfer second taxi license to wife and lease it off her to continue employment, wife already got the first taxi license for equalization, FRO moves to take away his license
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 30 K, home transferred to wife, both his taxi licenses, man hasn’t seen his children in 10 years, 100 K life insurance for security, 22 K arrears, unstated costs
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		100 K life insurance policy to secure support
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Man with 10 K income claimed intentionally unemployed and imputed to 40 K
Greer	F	T	L	L	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 3 million to court as security for wifes claims
Greer	F	T	F	M	Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man and wife imputed, man claims 88 K and is imputed to 146 K, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild
Greer	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 CanLII 15236 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 100 K security to court
Greer	F	T	F	sr	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.8	17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded,
Greer	F	T	F	sr	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, Man must go bankrupt to erase support interest, denied variation
Greer	F	T	M	M	Huck v. Huck, 2004 CanLII 22079 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	46.0	2.5 K per month spousal support, 20 K arrears, 43 K equalization, man claims 39 K income including 24 K loan and is imputed to 85 K, arrears 20.4 K
Greer	F	T	M	M	Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		100 K insurance used as security for support
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man in contempt for bankruptcy, 180 K lump sum, spousal support from pension to wife
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20 K costs for divorce action
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	180.0	180 K lump sum
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy to secure support, 180 K lump sum, bankruptcy, contempt
Greer	F	T	M	M	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	101	30 K lump sum support, an additional 71 K to be paid within 30 days.50 K interim disbursement, 35 K extraordinary expense, 8 K per month child support, interim motion
Greer	F	T	M	F	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt for disclosure, 93 K cost penalty
Greer	F	T	M	M	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	93.0	Interim motion to determine support, wife asks 99 K gets 93 K
Greer	F	T	M		Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3.0 K costs for interim motion
Greer	F	T	M		Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Greer	F	T	F	M	Selznick v. Selznick, 2002 CanLII 2778 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	5 K per month child support, 3.1 K s.7 expense, 6 K spousal support per month, 44 K retroactive arrears, man claims 300 K income and is imputed to 360 K
Greer	F	T	F	F	Tu v. Tu, 2000 CanLII 22591 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife given minor prejudgment and post judgment interest on support arrears
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal, 34 K for costs of uncontested trial
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	C	2.0	2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Herman	F	T	M	M	Adamson v. Steed, 2007 CanLII 1328 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	3 day trial, wife asks 47.5 K gets 20 K
Herman	F	T	M	M	Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44265 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Motion, 2.5 K costs
Herman	F	T	M	F	Davis v. Tangredi, 2006 CanLII 44269 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		5 million held frozen
Herman	F	T	M	F	D'Costa v. D'Costa, 2005 CanLII 56207 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	13.5	Support variation, wife asks for 19.3 K and gets 13.5 K
Herman	F	T	L	F	Ferazzutti v. Ferazzutti, 2006 CanLII 44271 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	Man claims 33 K income and is imputed to 47 K
Herman	F	T	M	M	Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		A large number of mans business deductions not allowed, man imputed to 422 K but claimed income not clearly stated
Herman	F	T	M	M	Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		500 K life insurance while children still receive support
Herman	F	T	F	F	O'Reilly v. O'Reilly, 2006 CanLII 44279 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	4.0	Man consents to impution at 20 K but is imputed to 24 K, recieves $ 500 per month spousal support
Herman	F	T	sr	F	Tock v. Tock, 2006 CanLII 44281 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K costs remaining owing, 450 K life insurance policy as long as he is obligated to pay support
Himel	F	T	M	M	Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife
Himel	F	T	M	M	Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife
Himel	F	T	M	M	Lenz v. Broadhurst Main, 2004 CanLII 5059 (ON S.C	mj	L	20.0	30 K lump sum payment reduced to 20 K, man sues his lawyers
Himel	F	T	sr	M	Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears
Himel	F	T	sr	M	Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	15.0	Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears
Himel	F	T	M	F	Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support
Himel	F	T	F	F	Yue v. Earl-McIntyre, 2001 CanLII 28178 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment granted against man on access, no motions for a year, security, cost penalty reduced on appeal
Himel	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs
Himel	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs
Karakatsanis	F	T	sr	m	Campbell v. Szoke, 2003 CanLII 2291 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	8.0	Mans maximum income over 6 years is 16 K imputed to 24 K, man must pay 1.1 K per month in spousal support
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	David v. McCain, 2006 CanLII 9302 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Interim motion for custody access, wife asks 20 K and gets 15 K, husband asks 40 K and gets increased access
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order for assault, wife requests it be made permanent denied, wife makes 2 unsubstantiated complaints to Childrens Aid, third party child exchanges, wife asks for access to children terminated or limited, supervised access denied
Karakatsanis	F	T	sr	M	Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man traded from stock account and lost money contrary to preservation order
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must pay funds from sale of condo into the court
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Fox v. Fox, 2006 CanLII 21065 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	85.8	Divorce action with a 10 day trial, wife asks 200 K gets 85.8 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Matanovic v. Matanovic, 2005 CanLII 47788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Interim motion, wife asks 10.3 K and gets 2.5 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2032 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.0	Support variaton, 17 K costs
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2183 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	55 K extra income imputed to man from RRSP’s
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Pinizzotto v. Pinizzotto, 2005 CanLII 34355 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	12.0	Man claims 63 K income and is imputed to 75 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	F	M	Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Daemi v. Morovati, 2003 CanLII 2092 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Man is unemployed and is imputed to 31 K, variation denied, man declares bankruptcy
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Kolody Ardan v. Ardan, 2002 CanLII 2689 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	53.0	Man with previously variable income is unemployed, income imputed to 53 K, support arrears, lump sum payment
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	1.8	Lump sum of $ 1750 but 22 K in calculated arrears of support
Kitely	F	T	F	M	Percival v. Percival, 2000 CanLII 22517 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	100.0	Man claims 800 K after tax income and is imputed to 900 K, 8 K per month support, 40 K retroactive arrears
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Reyes v. Rollo, 2001 CanLII 28260 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest
Kitely	F	T		M	Sait v. Thorne, 2006 CanLII 44280 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	200.0	Over 200 K in costs, 188 K is support related and survives mans bankruptcy
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man claims his income at 25 K and court imputes at 60 K
Kitely	F	T	F	F	Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	Man declares 24 K imputed to 84 K, retroactive arrears of support and s.7 expenses
Kitely	F	T	sr	F	Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Ex parate restraining order, wife gets custody
Klowak	F	T	M	F	Sharf v. Sharf, 2004 CanLII 5765 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 15 K per month total support
Klowak	F	T	sr	sr	Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man works out of home so cash flow may be more than reported, imputed to 30 K
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Man ordered in default, eventually set aside by Macdonald J
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts		12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside
Lax	F	T	M	M	Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	87.0	Previous declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K, 5.6 K per month in total support
Lax	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 1931 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man must comply with 10 K security order to receive trial judgment
Lax	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	46.0	Man claims 35 K income and is imputed at 81 K
Lax	F	T	M	M	Rueter v. Rueter, 2002 CanLII 2733 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Adjourned motion to strike pleading for not paying interim support. Permission to combine suit for flipping assets
Low	F	T	sr	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	56.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Low	F	T	sr	M	Hartmann v. Frantel, 2004 CanLII 16317 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed
Low	F	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K security to make motion
Low	F	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K costs for motion
Low	F	T	L	L	L.L.B. v. D.A., 2002 CanLII 2769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Ex parte restraining order, then complaint to Childrens Aid gets second restraining order and access temporarily suspended, wife gets custody and is allowed to move to Manitoba
Low	F	T	M	sr	McGoey v. McGoey, 2003 CanLII 2179 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Maintain insurance policy in wifes name to secure support
Low	F	T	L	L	Ristimaki v. Cooper, 2004 CanLII 16074 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, man leaves country
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Aunger v. Aunger, 2004 CanLII 39015 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	200.0	200 K lump sum support, wife already got 2 lump payments of 42 K
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Aunger v. Aunger, 2005 CanLII 9665 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	33.8	33.8 K for trial
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Husband gets default of over 13 K in costs penalties set aside but gets cost penalty of 1.5 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of home by lying to the court and husband gets occupation rent
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	Divorce action, 70 K cost
Macdonald	F	T	F	F	Hamid v. Hamid, 2003 CanLII 2128 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody
Macdonald	F	T	sr	M	Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, 2003 CanLII 2145 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	18.0	Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 38 K, wife makes 42 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5876 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man under non dissipation order
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	57 K lump sum, must continue to pay 4.2 K per month support until lump sum is paid
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Nichele v. Nichele, 2003 CanLII 1901 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Preliminary hearing in motion to vary support order, 5 K costs, man is allowed to proceed
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	49.0	Man claims 9 K income and is imputed to 58 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	350.0	Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	W	Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody
McWatt	F	T	M	F	De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	1900.0	Man quits job due to back problem, court rules intentionally unemployed and imputes income of 1.9 million per year
McWatt	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs for interim motion
Mesbur	F	T	sr	sr	Brown v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 43896 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Man earns 20 K or less and is imputed to 53 K, appeal dismissed
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Arrested for assault, he says she assaulted him, wife gets custody, 10 K per month total support, 116 K in arrears, freezing order
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	309.0	Man claims 90 K and is imputed to 399 K by arbitrator and award is made a court order, freezing order
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order against man continued
Mesbur	F	T	F	M	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	77.0	Man not working but imputed to 77 K per year, Man must pay 2.5 K per month total support, non depletion order
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Non depletion and trust account order continued for man until he repays about 180 K then his portion of the trust will be released., wifes funds released, marriage contract set aside, income imputed
Mesbur	F	T	F	L	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	$ 1000 to wife and mans motion to vary may proceed
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Haroun v. Haroun, 2001 CanLII 28128 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man claims 172 K income and is imputed to 230 K., 6 K per month spousal support, 250 K advance on equalization already paid
Mesbur	F	T	sr	m	Herskovits v. Herskovits, 2001 CanLII 28233 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	30 K lump sum
Mesbur	F	T	sr	sr	Ingles v. Watt, 2003 CanLII 2136 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man given supervised access, wife must pay half the costs, wife refuses to pay and man gets no access
Mesbur	F	T	F	F	Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man unemployed and presents plan for new business. Asks income be imputed at 30 K but court imputes at 88 K
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Onogi v. Elguindi, 2005 CanLII 23686 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	26.0	2 voluntary lump sums of 22 K and 24 K, court orders 26 K lump sum, equalization of 485 K and support of 5 K per month,. lump sum figures in US $
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Wife gets 3 ½ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 %
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 3 ½ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 %
Mesbur	F	T	L	L	Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	61.0	Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Wilcox v. Wilcox, 2003 CanLII 2272 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Mans support overpayment to be held by FRO as security for variation motion
Pepall	F	T	M	F	Danylkiw v. Danylkiw, 2003 CanLII 2283 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	15.0	Man pays 15 K lump for spousal support and 2 K per month child support, fraudulently reports income, children move in with man, wife ordered to pay retroactive support
Pepall	F	T	F	M	Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Pleadings struck for support default
Pepall	F	T	F	M	Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, 15 previous court orders, man ordered to pay 5 K per month
Pepall	F	T	M	M	Stein v. Stein, 2003 CanLII 46771 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Security held for costs paid out, man wins appeal and gets most returned
Sachs	F	T	M	M	Baldwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 21282 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security
Sachs	F	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	11.0	Mans income 37 K, imputed to 48 K
Sachs	F	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 879 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.8	Divorce action, wife claims 48K gets 10.8 K
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Bronfman v. Bronfman, 2000 CanLII 22710 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man made to deposit security with ex wifes lawyers
Sachs	F	T	L	L	Clegg v. Clegg, 2000 CanLII 22636 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 1.7 million for 4 years
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income, 61 K arrears, imputed income
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Sachs	F	T	M	M	Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt twice for selling property, first time 5 day imprisonment, second time sentencing hearing
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion for access and crossmotion for support, 4 K costs
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Spousal support default, security deposit 25 K, unemployed, 14 K arrears, variation denied
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Must post 25 K security to be held in trust against support and pay 14 K in arrears
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)\	mj	Ip	48.0	Man is unemployed but held to former income level of 48 K, variation denied
Sachs	F	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans share of home held as security for support
Sachs	F	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man subject to restraining order, ousts wife from house, wife gets custody, 2 K per month total support
Sachs	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, can be reinstated if he pays arrears and costs, man leaves country and is arrested as an absconding debtor
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Sarafinchin v. Sarafinchin, 2000 CanLII 22639 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	305.0	Man claims 80 K income and is imputed to 385 K per year, 4.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears
Speigel	F	T	sr	F	Hosannah v. Hosannah, 2004 CanLII 9498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Appeal, wife asks for 13.8 K and gets 7 K costs for motion
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default judgement of lump sum child and spousal support, 447 equalization payment, variation denied
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	447.0	Lump sum child and spousal support and equalization payment of 447 K, variation denied
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		GIC held as security for lump sum
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2004 CanLII 7044 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	7 K costs of motion
Stewart	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.)	mj	C		Contempt motion, 16.5 K
Stewart	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	16.5	Contempt motion, 16.5 K
Stewart	F	T	sr	m	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Mans supervised access changed to unsupervised, increase in support
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Qi v. Fung, 2006 CanLII 16366 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Motion for child support, husbands income imputed to 40 K, 1.5 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Romanski v. Romanska, 2004 CanLII 9784 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	12.0	12 K lump sun for retroactive spousal support
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Witz v. Witz, 2004 CanLII 27102 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Proceeds from sale of home held as security in case of equalization payment, 75 K paid out to wife
Swinton	F	T	M	M	S. D. v. R. L., 2004 CanLII 6323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife and husband are charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife moves in with boyfriend and has him charged with threats and harassment and changes locks on his house
Thorburn	F	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Thorburn	F	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K total costs
Young	F	T	M	M	Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	68.0	Man claims 28 K imputed to 96 K, retroactive support, expert witnesses, 1.2 K per month child support
Young	F	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs
Young	F	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs
Archibald	M	T	F	M	Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44264 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife has exclusive possession until she vacates, husband claim for damages is dismissed
Archibald	M	T	F	M	Shoniker v. Gibbs, 2006 CanLII 6915 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	190.0	Man claims 265 K income and is imputed to 455 K
Aston	M	T	M	M	Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	49.0	Man claims 28 K income tax and is imputed to 77 K, 4.7 K per month total support, variation dismissed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man earlier convicted of assault, wife alleges and doesn’t appear for trial so charges are dropped, then convicted for assaulting children, 46 K per year support
Aston	M	T	sr	M	Cantwell v. Cantwell, 2000 CanLII 22450 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	30 K lump sum for support from man who is unemployed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Delellis v. Delellis and Delellis, 2005 CanLII 36447 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Family claim including constructive trust, wife and child win 50 K and 10 K cost, claim 45 K costs
Aston	M	T	M	M	Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Prejudgment interest on multimillion dollar equalization will be about 100 K, 6.5 K spousal support per month
Aston	M	T	M	M	Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must keep life insurance policy designated to wife and children
Aston	M	T	sr	M	Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Aston	M	T	M	M	Gartley v. Thibert, 2002 CanLII 2726 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Adult child in school quits and mom doesn’t tell FRO. Man gets mostly varied
Aston	M	T	M	M	Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty
Aston	M	T	M	M	Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty, life insurance policy for security
Aston	M	T	sr	sr	Matheson v. Matheson, 2003 CanLII 1949 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default set aside with variation
Aston	M	T	M	M	Moore v. Fernandes, 2001 CanLII 28263 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non depletion order
Aston	M	T	M	M	Osmar v. Osmar, 2000 CanLII 20380 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Wife asks for 33 K and gets 25 K for trial
Aston	M	T	M	M	Picard v. Picard, 2001 CanLII 28214 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	79.0	Man claims 448 K income and is imputed to 527 K
Aston	M	T	sr	M	R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order for drunken abuse, police called, wife gets custody, supervised child exchanges
Aston	M	T	M	M	Sims-Howarth v. Bilcliffe, 2000 CanLII 22584 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K for motion
Aston	M	T	M	M	Snjaric. v. Snjaric, 2003 CanLII 1964 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order on mans property as security for support
Aston	M	T	M	M	Witzel v. Witzel, 2004 CanLII 5006 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security for support
Belobaba	M	T	M	F	Feher v. Healey, 2006 CanLII 33312 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	14.0	Husband sues wife over transfer of home and loses, wife asks for 26 K and gets 14 K
Brown	M	T	L	L	Javaid v. Valmas, 2006 CanLII 37882 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K costs for contempt motion
Brown	M	T	L	L	Kaplun v. Kaplun, 2007 CanLII 38396 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	7.5 K for motion
Brown	M	T	L	L	Lyons v. Tuffner, 2007 CanLII 30665 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 1.5 K costs
Brown	M	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Man on welfare imputed to 36 K and denied spousal support
Brown	M	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non dissapation order continued against mans request to have it lifted
Clark	M	T	L	L	Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 3371 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed many times higher than he claimed, costs 4 K
Clark	M	T	M	M	Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 6047 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Costs of motion 4 K
Clark	M	T	M	F	Copp v. Copp, 2004 CanLII 34077 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Divorce Action, 15 K costs
Clark	M	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	5.0	15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing
Clark	M	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing
Clark	M	T	F	M	Molitor v. Andreou, 2006 CanLII 3481 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Interim support motion, husband ordered to pay 5.3 K per month support, 5 K costs
Czurtin	M	T	M	F	Jordan v. Stewart, 2007 CanLII 11716 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Motion to vary support, wife asks 13.5 K and gets 7 K
Czutrin	M	T	M	M	K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	52.0	Man spends 2 ½ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears
Czutrin	M	T	M	M	K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man spends 2 ½ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears
Day	M	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K for interim motion
Ferrier	M	T	M	M	Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500
Ferrier	M	T	M	M	Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500
Grossi	M	T	M	M	Fabro v. Ferrante, 2003 CanLII 1952 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Establish life insurance as security for child support, common law wife gets constructive trust on family home
Hoilett	M	T	M	M	Goryjowski v. Goryjowska, 2005 CanLII 3395 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	21.0	Mans income imputed at 21 K
Hoilett	M	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		False records, income imputed, equalization based on her figures, a defaulting payor by not giving records
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 20 K income is imputed to 60 K
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with threatening wife, wife gets custody, man says he has no income, imputed at 60 K, 1.9 K per month total support, 50 K equalization
Jarvis	M	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K for motion
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	F		Non dissipation order, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	Sc		Man must deposit 317 K to court as security, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K costs, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	F	sr	Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.)l	mn	L	5.0	38 K arrears and 5 K lump sum award to be taken from mans portion of sale of home
Jarvis	M	T	sr	F	MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	1 K for interim motion, man goes bankrupt, retroactive arrears, man doesn’t appear at hearing
Jenkins	M	Sw	M	M	Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt 6.5 K penalty
Jennings	M	T	M	F	Nasser v. Mayer-Nasser, 2000 CanLII 5654 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession but husband may sleep in house until wife has husband arrested
Keenan	M	T	sr	sr	Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
Keenan	M	T	sr	sr	Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.1	6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man claims 72 K and is imputed to 100 K in 2004, order upheld in 2006
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Manis v. Manis, 2001 CanLII 3851 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Doesn’t comply with security order, depletes assets, contempt, imprisonment, appeal dismissed for non compliance
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Maurici v. Maurici, 2001 CanLII 24161 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	50.0	50 K lump sum upheld on appeal
O’Connell	M	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
OConnell	M	T	M	M	Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	155.0	Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K
OConnell	M	T	M	M	Pirner-Moser v. Pirner, 2003 CanLII 27465 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Cottage used as security in past, 45 days to pay lump sum or transfer
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession for previous 3 years, child support 15.3 K per month spousal support 9 K
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	1120.0	9 K per month spousal support, 15.3 K per month child support, man claims 176 K salary and income is imputed to 1296 K, wifes income imputed to 35 K
Paisley	M	T	M	M	Burke v. Burke, 2003 CanLII 2290 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Unemployed man held to former 53 K income, lowered to 40 K on appeal
Paisley	M	T	L	L	Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K lump sum for support arrears
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Flikerski v. Flikerski, 2001 CanLII 28126 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	$1500 costs of motion
Paisley	M	T	M	M	Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, affirmed at 3 further hearings, man must pay $ 1262 per month child support and $ 300 spousal support
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	35.0	Appeal of support dismissed with 40 K reduction, 35 K costs of appeal added to trial
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Narayan v. Padathe, 2006 CanLII 19943 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	75.0	Divorce action, 75 K costs
Paisley	M	T	sr	M	Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets permanent exclusive possession, husband drags out procedures purposefully
Paisley	M	T	sr	M	Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 4 years prejudgment interest
Spence	M	T	sr	M	Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.8	Contempt motion, 15.8 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
Spence	M	T	sr	M	Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt motion, $ 750 fine and 45 days in jail if he doesn’t pay fine and costs
Spence	M	T	M	M	Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Vesting order so wife gets condo, deemed to admit allegations against him due to default
Spence	M	T	M	M	Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Man in default, summary judgment for wife on property including vesting order

2) Penalties Against Women

Backhouse	F	T	M	F	Miller v. Shankman, 2004 CanLII 5063 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Unemployed wife imputed to 20 K income, gets 3 K per month spousal support
Benotto	F	T	M	sr	C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed
Benotto	F	T	M	sr	C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	F	Guziolek v. Guziolek, 2006 CanLII 10740 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man gets eclusive possession and wife gets occupancy rent, man has kids, house ordered sold
Croll	F	T	M	F	Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Womans variaton motion dismissed, overturned on appeal
Croll	F	T	sr	M	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan
Greer	F	T	F	M	Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man and wife imputed, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	45.0	Womans pleadings struck, claims 30 K income, imputed to 75 K
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Womans pleadings struck, june 2004, unstated costs, uncontested trial, claims 30 K income and imputed to 75 K, husband gets custody, 22 K retroactive arrears, home and cottage tranferred to man
Herman	F	T	M	sr	Dagorne v. Cormack, 2007 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 0.75 K cost penalty, second interim 0.75 cost penalty, wife hasn’t paid first penalty
Himel	F	T	M	F	Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support
Karakatsanis	F	T	F	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	56.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Low	F	T	sr	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt 1.5 K penalty later imposed by Benotto J
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.25	Contempt motion for arrears, 4.25 K cost including 0.75 K for cost submissions
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Brittain v. Brittain, 2003 CanLII 2289 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K for costs of denied mobility motion
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion to be paid out of 55 K lump sum
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody
Mesbur	F	T	F	L	Bunt v. Assuras, 2003 CanLII 17952 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Defaulted divorce judgement, set aside, man sues lawyers
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Burmi v. Dhiman, 2001 CanLII 28206 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion to amend pleadings for damage claim and add husbands parents, motion allowed but spousal support denied fo 7 week marriage
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Cundill v. Cundill, 2004 CanLII 30891 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K for costs of motion
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Grierson v. Brunton, 2004 CanLII 4019 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	13 K in imputed income to unemployed wife, previous job was over 30 K average
Mesbur	F	T	sr	M	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default divorce judgement set aside, and no contempt found over access
Mesbur	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs of interim motion
Mesbur	F	T	L	L	Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K
Thorburn	F	T	M	M		mn	D		Woman defaults payments under separation agreement, man get garnishment order that is stayed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Gartley v. Church, 2002 CanLII 2727 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Motion to adjust support overpayment, Husband is partially successful and claims 27 K and gets 3.5 K, wife claims 25 K
Aston	M	T	M	sr	L.C.M. v. C.A.V., 2003 CanLII 47888 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order against wife, husband gets custody of triplets wifes access denied
Aston	M	T	M	M	Sharpe v. Ebers, 2002 CanLII 2725 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Support variation, 4 K costs
Aston	M	T	M	sr	Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Wife who abducted children imputed to 30 K per year though unemployed, temporary suspension of support payable and some arrears rescinded
Aston	M	T	M	sr	Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Woman abducts children, made to deposit passport as security for access, order overturned, criminal charges
Ferrier	M	T	sr	M	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Womans default later overturned by Mesbur J
Keenan	M	T	L	L	Kallaba v. Bylykbashi, 2006 CanLII 3953 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Wifes motion for support is dismissed on summary judgment, wife gets security and vexacious litigant rulings overturned on appeal

Central Eastern Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Ce – Central East Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Boyko	F	Ce	1	0	1	0	2	0	1	0
Dunbar	F	Ce	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Eberhard	F	Ce	25	11	17	5	3	2	0	0
Ferguson	F	Ce	9	3	6	3	1	0	0	0
Lack	F	Ce	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Olah	F	Ce	11	1	9	1	2	1	0	0
Rogers	F	Ce	21	9	18	9	2	0	1	0
Scott	F	Ce	20	10	19	10	3	1	3	1
Wildman	F	Ce	10	8	9	7	1	0	1	0
Bryant	M	Ce	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Ditomaso	M	Ce	9	6	9	6	3	0	2	0
Glass	M	Ce	2	0	0	0	3	0	3	0
Graham	M	Ce	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
Howden	M	Ce	18	3	14	2	4	0	2	0
Ingram	M	Ce	4	2	3	1	0	0	0	0
Logan	M	Ce	3	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
MacDougall	M	Ce	10	2	8	2	1	0	1	0
Mackinnon	M	Ce	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Magda	M	Ce	7	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
McIssac	M	Ce	5	0	4	0	2	1	1	1
Misner	M	Ce	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Nelson	M	Ce	5	0	2	0	1	0	0	0
Perkins	M	Ce	32	4	23	4	5	1	2	1
Stong	M	Ce	5	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Timms	M	Ce	7	6	3	3	2	0	1	0
Wood	M	Ce	7	1	6	1	2	0	1	0

Female Judges	9	104	42	85	35	14	4	6	1
Male judges	17	122	29	82	20	23	2	13	2
Total	26	226	71	167	54	37	6	19	3

Central East Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 4

N = 11 Mean = 42.8 Total = 470.8

5.000 6.700 10.00 11.00 22.00 40.00 44.00 50.00 66.00 79.00 137.0

Male Imputed Income missing 8

N = 27 Mean = 75.5 Total = 2038.5

6.000 10.80 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 25.00 26.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 48.00 50.00 52.00 55.00 60.00 64.00 66.00 67.00 220.0 293.0 681.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 53 Mean = 22.0 Total = 1166.0

0.7000 1.000 1.400 2.000 2.100 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.000 4.300 4.500 4.500 4.700 4.700 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.500 6.000 6.000 7.000 7.000 7.300 9.000 10.00 10.00 10.20 10.50 11.00 12.00 12.50 12.80 15.00 15.00 15.50 15.70 16.00 16.20 16.60 21.30 24.40 28.70 40.00 42.00 44.00 45.00 45.90 64.00 87.90 91.60 320.0

Female Cost Penalties

N = 17 Mean = 9.1 Total = 154.7

0.3000 0.7000 0.7000 1.300 1.800 2.000 2.000 3.500 7.500 9.000 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 20.00 40.00

Central East Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

						mj	Js		Mans suit for damages for fraud over childs paternity dismissed, claim for past support dismissed bur arrears rescinded and support terminated
						mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 383 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support
		Ce	l	l	McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.)		Sa		Though primary caregiver in past made by wife to undergo supervised access, custody and access settled prior to trial
Boyko	F	Ce	M	M	Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	24.4	Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial wife asks 100K gets 24.4 K
Dunbar	F	Ce	L	L	Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted but award for damages denied, husband convicted of assault, daughter testifies, wife gets custody,
Dunbar	F	Ce			Griffin 2004	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	M	Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	50.0	Lump sum over 50 K given by transfer of home, $ 225 per month spousal support
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	M	Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man imprisoned for assault not allowed back home, vesting order on house to wife
Dunbar	F	E	M	M	Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.)	mj	C		Man sentenced to jail for contempt for failing to provide disclosure
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	F	Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		23 K held as security, security and 17 K more ordered to wife for spousal support arrears
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, Man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife mild
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, police visit to get personal items, wife gets custody, underemployed, mans stated income doubled by court
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Intransient with alcohol problem for many years ordered to pay 43 K in arrears and imputed from 12 K claimed to 25 K, must pay $ 600 per month
Eberhard	F	Ce			Critch v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 16630 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion, 4 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Divorce action, wife asks 58 K gets 40 K, man had a lawyer at trial
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans properties including those transferred to others are frozen for 90 days so wife can make claims against them
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans payment is secured against his mortgage
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	350.0	Wife has exclusive possession for 36 months and man is ordered to pay 350 K mortgage due to fraudulent loan he forged wifes signature to get, criminal charges
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	1 K per month spousal support, 1.6 K per month child support and $ 50 per month s.7 expense, 4 K arrears, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	Ernyes v. Rachlin, 2004 CanLII 47867 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Contempt motion, 4.5 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 305 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man with declared income of 46 K imputed to 66 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access, both spouses have other children, domestic violence history, impaired driving, urine testing and AA meetings ordered, inspection for alcohol by supervisor, must turn over car keys to supervisor install device on car ignition, supervision during visits relaxed, 2.4 K per month total support ordered
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr(ex)	F	Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr( ex)	F	Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	ex	Leroux v. Walker, 2001 CanLII 28194 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Man owes 4.1 K arrears and must pay $ 125 per month
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	McNaughton v. Price, 2006 CanLII 1453 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	64.0	Man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Savage v. Agnello, 2002 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Man claims 99 K and is imputed to 115 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2006 CanLII 22144 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Variation, 2.5 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	L	Ward v. Bates, 2005 CanLII 2947 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	66.0	Lump sums of 48 K and 18 K forced by FRO to pay arrears, intentionally unemployed, imputed income 100 K must borrow to stay out of jail, variation denied
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	F	M	Dorion v. Merkley, 2006 CanLII 38357 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.2	Husband loses interim motion 5.2 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	M	Goodfellow v. Goodfellow, 2005 CanLII 4847 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 60 K, variation refused
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	6 K costs for interim motions to vary support
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	293.0	Man claims 62 K income but is not varied and must continue paying at 355 K income.
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 24 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	F	Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.1	Interim motion on access variation, 2.1 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	F	Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		10 K to be held for security
Lack	F	Ce	M	M	Coscarella v. Coscarella, 2000 CanLII 20376 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.4	Interim motion, wife asks 2.6 K and gets 1.4 K, no costs for either side in divorce action
Lack	F	Ce	M	M	Laue v. Laue, 2000 CanLII 20295 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		60 K arrears, man clains a 2 K per year income, variation denied
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	Berry v. Ollerenshaw, 2003 CanLII 2405 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Allegations of drug use and sexual abuse by non biological father, supervised access, leave to appeal granted
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	22.0	22 K lump sum retroactive arrears
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 22 K equalization
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, 4 K per month support
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2005 CanLII 10541 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	42.0	Divorce trial, wife gets 42 K
Olah	F	Ce	M	F	Denby v. Denby, 2003 CanLII 2097 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	28.7	Divorve action, 4 day trial, 28.7 K costs
Olah	F	Ce	F	M	MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah	F	Ce	F	M	MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	11.0	Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah	F	Ce	sr	M	Rilli v. Rilli, 2006 CanLII 34451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	48.0	$ 1050 per month spousal support, man unemployed has 48 K income imputed to him, wife is unemployed and remarried to man who makes 14.4 K per year, wife has 9 K income imputed to her
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	Tomasone v. Tomasone, 2005 CanLII 1074 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		5 K security for motion
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Aguilera v. Reid, 2006 CanLII 6196 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Assault charges, supervised access ordered, drugs, criminal record, final order for supervised access
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, 2005 CanLII 6048 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	26.0	Man claims income 35 K and is imputed to 61 K
Rogers	F	Ce	F	M	Cook v. Burton, 2005 CanLII 1063 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order for 30 K against property and life insurance policy as security for support
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	0.7 K for interim motion
Rogers	F	Ce	ex	M	Ho v. Ho, 2003 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Preservation order already made against man, his pleadings struck, man does not answer, ex parte freezing order against mans family
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Ierullo v. Ierullo, 2006 CanLII 33301 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K costs of motion to vary and 5 K costs of appeal
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	sr	L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man unemployed and waiting for surgery imputed to 35 K per year
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	sr	L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man jailed for domestic assault, wife claims he’s a drug addict, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally umemployed
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	64.0	Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	11.0	Uncontested trial, husbands pleadings struck, 11 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted, the applicant has sworn to fear and 1 year order to let the respondents anger abates, 49 K equalization payment to go to FRO to secure support, arrears of retroactive support order varied, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 11K cost penalty
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Uncontested trial,49 K equalization payment to be held by FRO for security for support
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Abducts child, no charges, supervised access at wifes discretion, must give up passport to get access
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must give wife passport to get supervised access at her discretion
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Interims motions to strike pleadings, 7 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for failure to produce financial disclosure, uncontested trial ordered, 7 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce		sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	44.0	Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, lump sum spousal support, 44 K in cost arrears, man violates non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	44.0	Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	L	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, man blames lawyer, uncontesed trial, 44 K owing in costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	F	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order not to seek information from others, 5 K recognizance in case of breach
Scott	F	Ce	M	f	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		5 K recognizance for restraining order, bad faith, income and value of business imputed
Scott	F	Ce	M	F	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2006 CanLII 20528 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	87.9	Divorce action, 84.9 K costs, and 3 K costs to apportion award.
Scott	F	Ce	sr	sr	Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	52.0	Man claims he is unemployed and is imputed to 52 K
Scott	F	Ce	M	sr	Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Harris v. Stuart Harris, 2005 CanLII 28789 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	40.0	Lump sum payment of 40 K for spousal support, equalization would of gone 10 K against the wife so she is given additional 10 K unjust enrichment award brining total lump to 50 K
Scott	F	Ce	M	sr	Hill v. Hill, 2002 CanLII 2790 (ON S.C	mj	Ip	67.0	Mans declared income of 58 K imputed to 125 K
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	137.0	Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ro		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2006 CanLII 26573 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	66.0	Man quits job for farming and is imputed to 66 K, lowered to 60 K on appeal, 15 K costs of appeal
Scott	F	Ce	sr	M	Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		2 ½ years supervised access changed to unsupervised 4 hours a week, completed parenting classes, mother objects, support increased
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted for wife and child, man convicted of domestic assault, mans application to extend time limits for equalization dismissed, claim for access dismissed, wifes application for spousal support allowed to proceed, mans assets frozen
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody and mans access changed back to unsupervised
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip		6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.)	mn	L	6.7	6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husbands answer struck
Wildman	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck and can be reinstated on motion if he complies with 60 K payment and disclosure
Wildman	F	Ce	ex	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets ex parte orders freezing and seizing mans assets, man moved money out of country and abducted son, man gets supervised access, pleadings struck
Wildman	F	Ce	F	F	Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 22662 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.5	Wifes loses motion for summary judgment, man pays 10.5 K costs
Bryant	M	Ce	M	F	Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Unspecified one time lump support them motion for interim spousal and child support of 1.1 K per month granted
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	F	Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	21.0	Man on unemployment is intentionally unemployed, 21 K support arrears, imputed to 27 K per year
Ditomaso	M	Ce	F	F	Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.2	Default for not abiding by court order to sell home, pleadings struck, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	F	F	Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for non compliance in sale of the family home, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	M	M	Martin-Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 17019 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.6	I0 K costs against husband for questioning at which wife refused to answer, husbands motion to vary support stayed and 6.6 K costs for motion
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	D	267.0	Default on child and spousal support Charging order on property and RRSP, 25K lump sum arrears no motion to vary until paid 500 K imputed income
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man claims 3 year average 263 K income and is imputed to 530 K
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 9674 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	45.9	Motion to stay support and arrears and security, 45.9 K costs
Glass	M	Ce	M	F	Kirby v. Chappell, 2003 CanLII 1990 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.0	Divorce action with trial, 9 K costs
Glass	M	Ce	L	L	Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	Interim motion, wife claims 7.7 K and gets 5.5 K, husband claims 8.2 K
Graham	M	Ce	sr	sr	A.N. v. M.A.Z., 2006 CanLII 12316 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man pays 1.8 K per month based on an imputed income
Graham	M	Ce	sr	sr	Desjardins v. Waters, 2006 CanLII 1203 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Child support default, minor reduction of arrears, separation agreement overturned, imputed income
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man imprisoned and unemployed and imputed in arrears to Social services 38 K, varied to 11K
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Support variation, 15.K
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.7	Interim motion to vary support, 4.7 K costs
Howden	M	Ce	sr	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Denied variation for support, costs, access changed, leave requirement
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Mills v. Mills, 2004 CanLII 4793 (ON S.C.)	mn	Js		Wife granted summary judgement, minor adjustment of minutes of settlement
Howden	M	Ce	sr	sr	Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	6.0	Must claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K
Howden	M	Ce	sr	sr	Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must put life insurance policy of 75 K in place designated to wife
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed 130 K per month, wife at 41 K per month, man pays 1.2 K per month total support, wife mild
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	91.6	Divorce action, 91.6 K costs
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 5 K prejudgment interest, 90 K in total costs
Howden	M	Ce	L	F	Sloan v. Sloan, 2006 CanLII 38366 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.5	Support variation denied, 12.5 costs, man is intentionally unemployed
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	Stone v. Stone, 2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man in contempt for selling assets
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	Stone v. Stone, 2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Can’t file an answer until he pays, contempt for selling assets when under non dissapation order
Howden	M	Ce	F	M	Tavernier v. Tavernier, 2004 CanLII 5089 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K for motion
Ingram	M	Ce	M	M	Dasilva v. Dasilva, 2004 CanLII 5043 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets restraining order and custody, 1.8 K per month total support
Ingram	M	Ce	sr	sr	J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult
Ingram	M	Ce	sr	sr	J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult
Ingram	M	Ce	F	F	Raaymakers v. Green, 2004 CanLII 39 (ON S.	mj	L	79.0	79 K lump for spousal support giving wife the house with no equalization, 1.2 K child support and 1.4 K spousal support continued, 10 K lump penalty for failing to disclose financial information
Logan	M	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Income imputed to father but not specified, 1 K spousal support, joint custody switched to sole custody to wife
Logan	M	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		9K lump sum to secure 1 K spousal support, joint custody removed to wife sole custody, he has monthly deficeit, previous order to secure 150 K life insurance
Logan	M	Ce	sr	M	Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must hold 200 K private insurance and designate wife and children beneficiary of work related policies and benefits and wife is trustee,
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	M	Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	41.0	Mans imputed income increased from 58 K to 99 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	M	Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order against man, joint custody
MacDougall	M	Ce	F	M	Grant v. Grant, 2001 CanLII 28159 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 2 years prejudgment interest
MacDougall	M	Ce	sr	F	R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody
MacDougall	M	Ce	sr		R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic violence, impaired driving, drugs, jail, supervised access ordered, children want unsupervised, summary judgement denied and access set to trial
MacDougall	M	Ce	F	F	Salzmann v. Salzmann, 2004 CanLII 5009 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	3.6 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support per month including s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 170 K per year income and is imputed to 225 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs of appeal added to costs of trial
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man earns modest rental income that doesn’t cover his bills, imputed to 40 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K, constructive trust equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income
Mackinnon	M	Ce	F	M	Hyatt v. Whitney, 2002 CanLII 49537 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest on mans arrears
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody and exclusive possession of home, Wife gets 167 K equalization, imputed income
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Imputed to 75 K per year, 1.8 K per month support, vesting order on house, s.7 expenses
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	10 K interim lump payment for support, 175 vesting order on home with husbands share held in trust as security, 169 K equalization, domestic assault
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Vesting order securing 175 K child and spousal support proceeds to be held in trust, 169 K equalization, domestic assault
Magda	M	Ce	M	sr	Hatzidemetriou v. Hatzidemetriou, 2002 CanLII 2789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3 K costs of interim motion, pleadings struck, 50 K arrears
Magda	M	Ce	sr	M	Sokoljuk v. Sokoljuk, 2002 CanLII 2814 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Non dissipation order against man, wife gets support, man must pay into court funds held in foreign bank account, 5 K costs of motion
McIsaac	M	Ce			Martin 2004	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	M	Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	22.0	$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	F	R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	F	R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing
McIssac	M	Ce	L	L	Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		FRO default, variation refused
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Lump sum for retroactive support to be based on imputed income, equalization 351 K
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25900 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest
Misner	M	Ce	M	F	Marchildon v. Irwin, 2004 CanLII 15738 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody, termination of access denied, man must pay $ 200 extra per month on arrears of support
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife has had exclusive possession for 2 ½ years, order vesting the home to her, occupational rent denied but now she must pay the costs
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order
Nelson	M	Ce	M	F	K.(L.) v. G.(T.), 2006 CanLII 19333 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife makes various allegations of assault by child on father, allegations found unsubstanciated and access restored, mans contempt motion denied
Nelson	M	Ce	L	L	Shoval v. Shoval, 2005 CanLII 20817 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Wife allowed to move to Isreal with child makes allegations of sexual abuse, access suspended, supervised access in Isreal offered by mother, court allows order
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order continued, freezing order extended to house
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	21.3	Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	F	sr	Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 1942 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Life insurance policy for security, complex separation agreement including 25 K security for costs for variation motion
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42934 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.0	Wife gets husbands answer struck, 16 K costs and 5 K costs of appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husband in violation of disclosure orders. pleadings struck, uncontested trial ordered, appeal denied
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	5.0	2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.)	mn	Sc		2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	10.8	Man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 19156 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.2	Dividided success in application, husband pays 15K and 1.2 K for costs ruling
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	L	Diciaula v. Mastrogiacomo, 2006 CanLII 11928 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck reinstated and then reinstatement overturned on appeal, impited income, supervised access, 12.5 K costs of appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	F	F	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on support as mans pleadings were struck and he is denied participating
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	F	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 45568 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Husbands pleadings struck, 12 K costs for motion
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Duguay v. Thompson-Duguay, 2000 CanLII 22515 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Separation agreement overturned due to mans default in paying support
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.5	Interims motions, wife claims 20 K gets 15.5 K
Perkins	M	Ce	F	M	Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	681.0	Man claims 139 K income and is imputed to 820 K on capital gains
Perkins	M	Ce	F	M	Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest on retroactive support award
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Haunert-Faga v. Faga, 2005 CanLII 39324 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Pleadings struck is overturned by Court of Appeal if man submits disclosure
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	M	Ho v. Ho, 2003 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Preservation order against mans assets but when wife has them seized they are already gone, mans pleadings struck
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife is given exclusive possession, non depletion order, mutual restraining order, $ 700 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support, joint custody, oldest child lives with father
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual allegations mutual non harassment order, son testifies mothers allegations aren’t true, joint custody with primary residence with wife, 1.8 K per month total support
Perkins	M	Ce	F	sr	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	15 K security, 7 K costs of security motion
Perkins	M	Ce	F	sr	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K security, 7 K costs of security motion
Perkins	M	Ce	L	L	S.(C.) v. S.(M.), 2007 CanLII 20279 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	320.0	Husband denied access to child must pay 320 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	F	F	Sedore v. Sedore, 2006 CanLII 2622 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.3	Divorce action, 7.3 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.0	5 K lump on extraordinary child expenses, 12 K lump retroactive child support, charged on sale of house, domestic assault, hasn’t seen child in 1 ½ years, permanent restraining order
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Domestic assault, wife given permanent restraining order, wife gets custody, man hasn’t seen his children in 1 ½ years, 17 K lump sums, charging order on house
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic violence, wife given interim custody and man supervised access, supervised access for 2 ½ years, to be expanded if child wishes, support arrears, security against family home
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Sh. É. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		23 K remaining proceeds of home held for security for support, rest of his 114 K equity goes to wife for arrears, wife to be designated beneficiary of insurance policy
Perkins	M	Ce	F	F	Visconti v. Visconti, 2006 CanLII 2626 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Wife gets 3 K on consent motion regarding setting husbands income
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	West v. West, 2001 CanLII 28216 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	220.0	Man claims 160 K income, originally imputed to 380 K, reimpured to 230 K
Stong	M	Ce	M	M	Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 44987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.8	Motion for support, 12.8 K costs
Stong	M	Ce	sr	F	Dunn v. Menear, 2003 CanLII 20236 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.3	Support variation, 4.3 K costs
Stong	M	Ce	M	F	Metter v. Solomon, 2005 CanLII 9673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.7	Support variation, 15.7 K costs
Strong	M	Ce	M	M	King v. Sutherland, 2005 CanLII 6377 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.7	Motion for support, 4.7 K costs
Strong	M	Ce	M	F	Munro v. Munro, 2004 CanLII 44992 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	2 K cost penalty seeking leave to appeaL 1.5 K cost penalty
Timms	M	Ce	sr	F	Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1668 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K for interim motion
Timms	M	Ce	sr	F	Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Arrears rescinded for time in jail, imputed income of 33 K to unemployed man, support secured against mans share of family home
Timms	M	Ce	sr	F	Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Arrears rescinded for time in jail, imputed income of 33 K to unemployed man, support secured against mans share of family home
Timms	M	Ce	sr	F	Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Remainder of his procceds of sale of the home are to be held as security for child support
Timms	M	Ce	sr	M	Dvernichuk v. Larouche, 2003 CanLII 2107 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Motion for access and custody, 4.5 K costs
Timms	M	Ce	L	L	Mercieca v. Merciera, 2002 CanLII 2754 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife obtains an ex parte restraining order which precludes access alleging child is afraid of father, order changed to restraining father from taking child out of Ont, court refuses to renew after it lapses with no trouble
Timms	M	Ce	sr	F	R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets ex parte restraining order and limited supervised access for husband
Wood	M	Ce	F	M	Cade v. Rotstein, 2002 CanLII 2811 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Lump sum payments for increases in child support, pays 1.8 K per month child support, 3.5 K per month spousal support
Wood	M	Ce	sr	M	Fernbach v. Fernbach, 2004 CanLII 14589 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, pretrial striking prevents post trial motion, income imputed at 120 K
Wood	M	Ce	F	M	Gallaugher v. Gallaugher, 2005 CanLII 19767 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		2 lump sums to make up adjusted arrears or original apply. Fails to make all payments and arrears not rescinded
Wood	M	Ce	F	M	Gallaugher v. Gallaugher, 2005 CanLII 19767 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Wife forces payment of support arrears through security on sale of house
Wood	M	Ce	M	M	Liao v. Liao, 2003 CanLII 2167 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession to be reviewed in 2 months, man must pay $ 813 per month child support and $ 5000 per month spousal support going up to $ 6500 after wife leaves home
Wood	M	Ce	M	M	Moreau v. Moreau, 2004 CanLII 822 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	Man is unemployed but imputed to 25 K
Wood	M	Ce	M	sr	Steffler v. McComb, 2005 CanLII 25955 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault and threatening not allowed in town, man gets custody, wife found in contempt with holding possessions and given 1 K fine and 2.5 K costs

2) Penalties Against Women

Boyko	F	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	Interim motion, $ 650 costs
Boyko	F	Ce	M	M	Fredriksen v. Lehane, 2003 CanLII 2122 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Wife has custody, arrested for drunk driving, temporary supervised access, custody given to father
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife also imputed, mild
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	sr	Crocker v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 48314 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.8	$ 1750 costs offset against 4.5 K support arrears, mans arrears reduced
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	McMurray v. Gerow, 2004 CanLII 5758 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.3	$ 1300 for repeated mobility motion, motion does not comply with court order to return the child to Ontario
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	F	Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.3	Interim motion on access variation, 0.3 K costs
Olah	F	Ce	F	sr	Brown v. Brown, 2007 CanLII 13703 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Unemployed woman imputed to 17 K, recieves spousal support and does not have to pay child support
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	Interim motion, $ 675 costs
Rogers	F	Ce	M	L	V.T. v. V.S.1, 2006 CanLII 9157 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Abducts children, refuses to return them, criminal charges, 7 months additional for contempt of family court
Scott	F	Ce	M	sr	Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned
Scott	F	Ce	F	F	G.W.H. v. L.E.B., 2006 CanLII 19944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Wife has remarried and stays home to take care of new family, imputed to 20 K income and must pay child support
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Interim order freezing wifes assets granted, restraining order for wife and children against man
Sills	F	Ce	L	L	G.J.K. v. W.R.M., 2006 CanLII 23260 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Common law husband given exclusive possession but must pay $ 900 per month spousal support, husband has children but no child support ordered
Wildman	F	Ce	M	F	L.K. v. T.G., 2007 CanLII 10411 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Husband wins motion for unsupervised access, claims 20 K and gets 10 K, his contempt motion denied
Ditomaso	M	Ce	M	F	Heath v. Heath, 2006 CanLII 19458 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Contempt motion, wife empties house with moving van against direct court order, 5 K penalty, 15 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	M	F	Heath v. Heath, 2006 CanLII 19458 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Contempt motion, wife empties house with moving van against direct court order, 5 K penalty, 15 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	F	F	Lundrigan v. Andrews, 2004 CanLII 34803 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Common law wife imputed frpm 5 K claimed to 15 K income, recieves 1.4 K spousal support
Ditomaso	M	Ce			Ross v. Pishalski, 2005 CanLII 9678 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K for denied jurisdiction motion
Glass	M	Ce	M	F	Hill v. Hill, 2005 CanLII 3476 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.0	Motion to enforce a separation agreement, husband claims 21 K gets 16 K
Glass	M	Ce	F	M	McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	Divorce action, 9 K costs
Glass	M	Ce	F	M	McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2804 (ON S.C.	mj	L		16 K lump sum for retroactive spousal support from equalization, 1 K per month support, security denied
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	D.E.W. v. E.C., 2005 CanLII 16603 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mother has custody for 11 years. Children taken by Childrens Aid, father given custody, initially supervised access then unsupervised, child support offset against fathers arrears
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Donnelly v. Donnelly, 2004 CanLII 9296 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Wife pays 40 K costs for divorce action
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K for motion about house
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	41.0	Mans income imputed 130 K per month, wife at 41 K per month, man pays 1.2 K per month total support, wife mild
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	M	Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted due to serious allegations with some corroboration
McIsaac	M	Ce	L	L	Monague v. Monague, 2005 CanLII 33584 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife charged with assault, takes children and leaves, wife gets custody
McIssac	M	Ce	M	sr	Cole v. Cole, 2005 CanLII 44828 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Intentionally underemployed as she earns less as a teacher, imputed to former income, retroactive support and s.7 expenses
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Wifes has small imputed income, minor
Perkins	M	Ce	F	sr	Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 2084 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	2 motions 10 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual allegations mutual non harassment order, son testifies mothers allegations aren’t true, joint custody with primary residence with wife, 1.8 K per month total support
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Savoie v. Richard, 2004 CanLII 47793 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Motion, husband asks for 6.8 K gets 2 K
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Wozniak v. Brunton, 2006 CanLII 273 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wifes access to child terminated for bizzare criminal behaviour including child abduction, restraining order from family cut from 500 m to 100 m
Timms	M	Ce	M	M	Caldwell v. Caldwell, 2007 CanLII 8918 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Motion for support against wife who hasn’t paid, 20 K costs
Timms	M	Ce	M	F	Mercieca v. Merciera, 2003 CanLII 2184 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	Divorce action, 15 K costs
Wood	M	Ce	M	M	D.M.B. v. D.C.B., 2005 CanLII 24599 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Found in contempt for denial of access, no sanctions imposed
Wood	M	Ce	M	M	S.M.G. v. M.J.J.G., 2006 CanLII 16 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	Custody variance, husband asks 50 K gets 7.5 K

Central South Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Cs – Central South Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Lafrenierre	F	Cs	4	1	3	1	0	0	0	0
McLaren	F	Cs	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Millanetti	F	Cs	4	0	4	0	1	1	1	1
Tucker	F	Cs	5	4	3	2	2	0	0	0
Walters	F	Cs	4	2	2	1	0	0	0	0
Borkovich	M	Cs	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Cavarzan	M	Cs	8	0	2	0	3	0	2	0
Fedak	M	Cs	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Festeryga	M	Cs	6	1	5	1	2	0	2	0
Flynn	M	Cs	15	5	9	2	6	2	3	1
Glithero	M	Cs	8	3	3	0	4	1	1	0
Gordon D	M	Cs	29	6	19	5	9	0	2	0
Hambly	M	Cs	27	1	16	1	5	2	1	1
Harris	M	Cs	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Henderson	M	Cs	10	2	4	0	0	0	0	0
Lofchik	M	Cs	3	1	3	1	0	0	0	0
Marshall	M	Cs	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Matheson	M	Cs	13	2	9	2	2	0	0	0
Mazza	M	Cs	3	1	2	1	2	0	1	0
Pazaratz	M	Cs	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Quinn	M	Cs	11	6	9	5	5	3	1	1
Reilly	M	Cs	3	1	2	1	0	0	0	0
Sheppard	M	Cs	2	2	2	2	0	0	0	0
Scime	M	Cs	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Sills	M	Cs	5	3	3	2	0	0	0	0
Steinberg	M	Cs	4	1	3	0	0	0	0	0
Taliano	M	Cs	7	1	6	1	1	0	0	0
Taylor	M	Cs	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Turnbull	M	Cs	16	4	10	3	4	1	2	1
Whitten	M	Cs	8	1	5	1	0	0	0	0

Female Judges	5	19	7	13	4	3	1	1	1
Male judges	25	192	43	122	29	44	9	15	4
Total	30	211	50	133	33	47	10	16	5

Central South Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 15 Mean = 26.6 Total = 399.0

5.000 8.500 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 15.00 20.00 27.50 29.00 35.00 41.00 45.00 50.00 79.00

Male Imputed Income missing 1

N = 22 Mean = 30.0 Total = 660.0

1.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 9.000 10.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 28.00 32.00 35.00 37.00 40.00 44.00 47.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 78.00 100.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 86 Mean = 18.9 Total = 2214.5

0.3000 0.5000 0.7000 0.7000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 1.000 1.100 1.200 1.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.100 2.600 2.800 3.000 3.000 3.100 3.200 3.500 3.500 3.800 4.100 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 5.800 5.900 5.900 5.900 6.000 6.400 6.400 6.800 6.900 7.000 7.400 7.400 7.500 7.800 8.000 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.700 9.400 10.00 10.00 10.60 11.00 12.50 12.50 13.40 13.60 14.30 14.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.70 17.90 18.90 19.50 20.30 20.60 22.00 22.50 23.90 32.00 34.30 39.00 40.00 44.70 46.00 46.80 50.00 58.70 75.00 90.00 103.4 112.4 144.6 150.0

Female Cost Penalties

N = 27 Mean = 24.3 Total = 655.0

0.1000 0.8000 1.500 2.000 2.400 2.500 3.000 3.000 5.200 5.300 6.400 9.000 9.500 9.500 10.00 13.60 15.00 16.00 31.00 32.00 32.00 35.00 35.00 40.70 45.50 89.00 200.0

Central South Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Lafreniere	F	Cs	F	M	Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs of interim motion reserverved for trial judge
Lafreniere	F	Cs	F	M	Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	45.0	24 K lump sum paid, 21 K ordered for arrears of child support
Lafreniere	F	Cs	M	F	Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 9 years prejudgment interest on 57 K
Lafrenierre	F	Cs	sr	M	D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	9.0	Man claims 15 K imputed to 26 K
Mclaren	F	Cs	M	M	Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	1.0	Man s income drops. Minor 1 K imputation added to his claim instead of 9 K asked
McLaren	F	Cs	M	M	Patterson v. Patterson, 2007 CanLII 26288 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	144.6	Divorce action, wife successful on 4 out of 6 issues, wife asks 342 K and gets 144.6 K
Milanetti	F	Cs	M	M	Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	100.0	Man declares 100 K income and is imputed to 200 K, 10 K per month total interim support, 35 K interim disbursement to wife
Milanetti	F	Cs	M	F	Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	3.0	Motion, wife asks 75 K in costs and gets 25 K, and wife gets 3 K in cost for case conference
Millanetti	F	Cs	M	F	Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Wife gets 40 K costs
Millanetti	F	Cs	M	F	Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession, 10 K per month combined support
Tucker	F	Cs	sr	M	Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	37.0	Man on disability imputed to 47 K per year, lump sum retroactive support
Tucker	F	Cs	sr	M	Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Restraining order against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive lump sum for support, imputed income
Tucker	F	Cs	F	M	Danis v. Danis, 2004 CanLII 8245 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	47.0	Man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K
Tucker	F	Cs	sr	M	Gill v. Knack, 2007 CanLII 1332 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Only remaining issue was Christmas access, 3.5 K costs
Tucker	F	Cs	sr	M	Siconolfi v. Siconolfi, 2007 CanLII 1327 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.0	Divorce action partially settled, wife asks 15.5 K gets 7 K
Walters	F	Cs	sr		Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		4 K retroactiver child support award to be paid $ 50 per month, supervised access changed to unsupervised
Walters	F	Cs	M	F	Royston v. Royston, 2003 CanLII 1978 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Walters	F	Cs	sr	sr	T.P.S. v. K.E.S, 2007 CanLII 17382 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans assets frozen, man violates order, wife abducts children
Walters	F	Cs	F	M	Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man gets interim supervised access, continued by Scott J, wife gets custody and access restored in agreement
Gordon	M	Cs	sr	M	A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 17600 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.9	Divorce action, 17.9 K costs
Borkovich	M	Cs	M	F	Bremer v. Bremer, 2005 CanLII 6387 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs incurred by wife due to husbands intransience
Borkovitch	M	Cs	M	F	Bremer v. Bremer, 2004 CanLII 17346 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Kreutzer v. Corbeil, 2005 CanLII 6395 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, and pays occupancy rent
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	R. v. R., 2000 CanLII 22425 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on retroactive support, 20 K child support per month and 5 K spousal support
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 19446 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, man pays spousal support
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 9982 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order for assault, 5 K damages, court denies permanent restraining order, supervised access changed to joint custody with primary residence with wife, 2.3 K per month total support, wife gets exclusive possession of home
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 9982 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Domestic assault, supervised access, joint custody at trial, lump sum, imputed income, 2.4 K per month total support, non harassment order, 4 K damages for assault
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Tessarolo v Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 25108 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	5.0	Lump sum 5 K compensatory support, life insurance as security
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Tessarolo v Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 25108 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Lump sum 5 K compensatory support, life insurance as security
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Tessarolo v. Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 30882 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Wife asks for 6 K, husband asks for 12 K, wife gets 10 K
Fedak	M	Cw	sr	sr	Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man under restraining order not to see children
Fedak	M	Cs	M	M	Ragis v. Ragis, 2005 CanLII 18854 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, only issue left for trial was support, 10 K costs
Festeryga	M	Cs	sr	M	Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order for verbal arguments against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive support lump sum, imputed income
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	M	Keen v. Keen, 2007 CanLII 6919 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K interim motion
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	M	Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets long term exclusive possession for 6 more years, man pays child support but not spousal
Festeryga	M	Cs	F	F	S.P. v. F.R., 2006 CanLII 19948 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.3	Divorce action, wife asks 25 K and gets 20 .3 K, husband Asks 30.3 K
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	M	Sheppard v. Sheppard, 2005 CanLII 30878 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Prejudgment interest awarded as lump sum, 8 K per month support, 1.2 million equalization to be paid in installments of 200 K
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	M	Sheppard v. Sheppard, 2005 CanLII 30878 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest
Flynn	M	Cs	sr	F	Atkinson v. Atkinson, 2007 CanLII 14318 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	14.5	Divorce trial. 14.5 K
Flynn	M	Cs	L	L	Boddington v. Boddington, 2003 CanLII 45771 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.5	8.5 K costs of motion
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	Claer v. Claer, 2006 CanLII 32612 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Motion, wife asks 8.5 K gets 5 K
Flynn	M	Cs	sr	F	Cupolo v. Anzovino, 2003 CanLII 2091 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	1.0	1K for ex parte divorce, requested 11 K
Flynn	M	Cs	sr	F	Del Net v. Benger, 2003 CanLII 2096 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	6.8	Mother allowed to move with child, 6.8 K costs
Flynn	M	Cs	sr	L	Duquette v. Gregorio, 2006 CanLII 32615 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.4	2.4 Kcosts for access motion
Flynn	M	Cs	M	M	Eberl v. Eberl, 2004 CanLII 10617 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man laid off from job is imputed to 28 K and it’s ordered no variations until his income exceeds 28 K, court refuses to impute income to wife, Man must pay spousal support and $ 500 per month in child support
Flynn	M	Cs	M	M	Johannesson v. Johannesson, 2003 CanLII 2141 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.1	Contempt access motion by husband, 2.1 K costs
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	Lagos v. Lagos, 2006 CanLII 43492 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	6.9	Motion, 6.9 K costs
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 34782 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Husband must designate wife as beneficiary of his insurance policy
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 47798 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	19.5	72 K retroactive support, 19.5 K costs
Flynn	M	Cs	L	M	Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	44.0	Man claims 117 K and is imputed to 161 K, 70 K support lump as part of agreement before guidelines came into effect
Flynn	M	Cs	M	M	Nittel v. Nittel, 2007 CanLII 14340 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	22.0	Divorce action 22 K
Flynn	M	Cs	sr	sr	Platonova v. Platonov, 2005 CanLII 2951 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Divorce action, self represented wife gets 2 K costs against intrasient husband
Flynn	M	Cs	M	M	Vernon v. Vernon, 2006 CanLII 23266 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Motion for support, wifes partial lawyers bill 47 K, 15 K costs
Glithero	M	Cs	L	L	Ashley v. Ashley, 2006 CanLII 32603 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Support motion, 8 K costs
Glithero	M	Cs	M	M	Defoe v. Defoe, 2004 CanLII 5040 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.2	Divorce action, all but support settled on consent, wife gets 1.2 K
Glithero	M	Cs	M	F	Erb v. Erb, 2003 CanLII 2308 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.9	Divorce action, wife asks 23.8 K gets 18.9 K
Glithero	M	Cs	L	L	Harnum v. Harnum, 2005 CanLII 3231 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	12.5	12.6 K costs for 2 day trial
Glithero	M	Cs	sr	M	Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	13.6	Wife gets interim exclusive possession, man declares bankruptcy, 13.6 K costs for trial
Glithero	M	Cs	sr	M	Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets interim exclusive possession, man declares bankruptcy, 13.6 K costs for trial
Glithero	M	Cs	L	L	Visneskie v. Visneskie, 2003 CanLII 2265 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Glithero	M	Cs	L	L	Wood v. Wood, 2004 CanLII 14407 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	23.9	Wife gets 23.9 K for divorce action
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	M	A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Failure to provide disclosure, default on ordered return of funds results in unequal division with man prohibited from claiming debts to wife in his bankruptcy
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	M	A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Proceeds from home held in trust and disbursed to wife, life insurabce as security for support
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 47755 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		FRO takes mans drivers license and the court refuses to hear motion for relief
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	L	Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 26600 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.5	12.5 K for motion for constructive trust and retroactive support from bankrupt husband
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Conway v. Conway, 2005 CanLII 14136 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	13.5	13.5 K lump sum for support, 6 K for equalization
Gordon D	M	Cs	F	M	Craig v. Craig, 2004 CanLII 5039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.4	Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	F	F.J.N. v. J.L.N., 2004 CanLII 34783 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	Divorce action including mobility, wife asks 20.2 K gets 15 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	M	H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.9	1 day simple trial, 5.9 K costs
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Hunter v. Hunter, 2005 CanLII 22139 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 67 K equalization payment
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Kelly v. Kelly, 2002 CanLII 2700 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.2	Interim motion, wife asks 4.6 K and gets 3.2 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Lee-Chin v. Lee-Chin, 2005 CanLII 47758 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	13.4	Several interim motions consolidated into one hearing, wife asks 29.9 K gets 13.4 K, husband asks 37.1 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Lindahl v. Lindahl, 2005 CanLII 34583 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, children live in home man and wife switch each week, wife moves to US and court allows her mobility while she has children
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	MacGregor v. MacGregor, 2002 CanLII 2752 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife alleges husband has a drinking problem, access supervised by husbands mother
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Mayer v. Mayer, 2003 CanLII 2177 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Interim motion on parenting schedule, 4.5 K costs, mutual non depletion and harassment order on consent
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2006 CanLII 11921 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order against man kept in effect but charging or vesting order denied
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual non depletion and harassment order, wife gets support, wife get exclusive possession of home on consent
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Neither oppose mutual non harassment and non depletion orders, older sons live with man, no custody or child support order, 3.2 K per month spousal support to wife
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Plotz v. Boehmer-Plotz, 2004 CanLII 34349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.5	Support variation dismissed, 8.5 K costs
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	M	Purves v. Purves, 2004 CanLII 6249 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, fathers income imputed from 18 to 25 K per year, joint custody changed to sole custody to mother
Gordon D	M	Cs	sr	M	R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Fathers unsupervised access reduced to supervised
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	15.0	15 K lump sum for retroactive support, life insurance policy as security
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Secure life insurance in wifes name of almost 1 million for spousal of $ 4500 per month
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		50 K held from sale of home for wife uequal division claim
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	150.0	Divorce action, wife wins mobility, asks 190 K and gets 150 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	L	Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	20.0	Man pays lump sum of 20 K for back support, equalization of 80 K and costs of 150 K, mother allowed to move to England with child
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Stockie v. Stockie, 2003 CanLII 2353 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		42 K RRSP to be preserved and 100 K security deposit to the court
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	Man is unemployed and income is imputed to 60.6 K per year
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.9	5.9 K for motion
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	F	Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	10.0	Man claims 19 K income from compensation and is imputed to almost 30 K as underemployed, 45 K arrears reduced to 40 K arrears
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Brandon v. Brandon, 2003 CanLII 2069 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	Access motion to determine where children go to school, 0.7 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	sr	M	Buck v. Buck, 2003 CanLII 2072 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.5	Unnecesary motion, 8.5 K costs, wife gets proceeds from sale of home as advance on equalization
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Cauchy-Eckardt v. Eckardt, 2004 CanLII 6225 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.4	Support motion, wife asks 8 K and gets 7.4 K
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	Crewe v. Crewe, 2006 CanLII 3656 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		4 months interim supervised access continued by Sills J, 2 ½ hours every second Sunday
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	9.0	Unemployed man imputed to 9 K and 40 K arrears rescind, arrears reinstated on appeal
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Eberl v. Eberl, 2004 CanLII 10617 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Fleming v. Fleming, 2005 CanLII 19832 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	Motion to vary access to unsupervised dismissed, 0.8 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Fleming v. Fleming, 2005 CanLII 19832 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Motion to vary access to unsupervised dismissed, 0.8 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Fulmer v. Kaleo-Fulmer, 2002 CanLII 2719 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.6	2.6 K costs for custody variation motion, changed to sole custody to wife
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Gentle v. Gentle, 2007 CanLII 26606 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Motion to vary support. 3.8 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim exclusive possession and custody of children
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2004 CanLII 6232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.1	Summary judgment on s.7 expenses and travel consent, 1.1 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2004 CanLII 6232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Js		Summary judgment on s.7 expenses and travel consent, 1.1 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	Plotz v. Boehmer-Plotz, 2004 CanLII 34349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	5.8	Support variation dismissed, 5.8 K costs, previous 15 K cost award unpaid, 27 K arrears
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Purvis v. Purvis, 2003 CanLII 18186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	Interim motion $ 700 costs, man must pay equalization based on property evaluation 55 K above sale price
Hambly	M	Cs	M	F	R.W.L. v. K.A.L., 2003 CanLII 2168 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.9	Husband brings motion for custody assessment and access, 5.9 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	M	F	R.W.L. v. K.A.L., 2003 CanLII 2168 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Access to be at wifes discretion
Hambly	M	Cs	M	L	R.W.L. v. K.A.L., l2003 CanLII 2453 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man first charged with assault takes anger management, second charges, wife gets custody, third party child center exchanges, makes allegations to Childrens Aid, access cut and must take parenting class
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 34788 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	58.7	Separation agreement varied, 58.7 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 34788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 5 % on 10 K for 6 years and 3 months
Hambly	M	Cs	M	M	Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 35095 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	79.0	79 K lump sum for retroactive support, separation agreement overturned, spousal support increased from $ 400 to 1.2 K per month
Hambly	M	Cs	F	M	Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.5	Divorce action, 7.5 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	F	M	Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	18.0	Man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	Smith v. Lennox, 2004 CanLII 51969 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans supervised access at access center terminated and access at wifes discretion at a secure safe place
Hambly	M	Cs	M	F	Tzeng v. Tzeng, 2007 CanLII 17042 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	112.4	Wife gets 112.4 K costs in assault action against husband, 150 K damage award
Hambly	M	Cs	L	L	Von Feilitz v. Von Feilitz, 2002 CanLII 2821 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	0.8K for previous interim motion
Harris	M	Cs	M	M	Costa v. Costa, 2002 CanLII 2708 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.3	Divorce action, 5 day trial, wife asks 41.7 K and gets 34.3 K
Harris	M	Cs	L	L	Fahandezh v. Fahandezh Sadi, 2002 CanLII 2734 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Harris	M	Cs	M	M	Leng v. Marini, 2006 CanLII 27872 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Man must pay 6.7 K in previous costs
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Cianflone v. Cianflone, 2006 CanLII 37127 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	14.3	Divorce action no kids 14.3 K costs
Henderson	M	Cs	sr	M	Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Appeal of support variance, 2 K costs
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Keen v. Keen, 2007 CanLII 6919 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.4	Divorce action settled on consent except support, 9.4 costs
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Little v. Little, 2002 CanLII 2797 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Insurance for security, vesting order on house, 2.1 K per month spousal support, 20 K equalization
Henderson	M	Cs	sr	M	Longpre v. Skursky, 2005 CanLII 31301 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.3	Motion to vary support dismissed, $ 250 costs unless higher bill approved
Henderson	M	Cs	F	F	MacGregor v. Stone, 2004 CanLII 42944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	50.0	Divorce trial, 50 K costs, 7.5 K costs of appeal
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Racz v. Racz, 2004 CanLII 39025 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Divorce action settled on consent, 4.5 K costs
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Racz v. Racz, 2004 CanLII 39025 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets $ 354 prejudgment interest and 4.5 K costs
Henderson	M	Cs	L	L	Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 14151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $457 child support per month and $ 1500 spousal support
Henderson	M	Cs	M	M	Zeleny v. Zeleny, 2004 CanLII 5094 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.8	Wife agreed to pay lawyer $ 90 per hour but judge raises it to $ 195, 7.8 K for one motion
Lofchik	M	Cs	sr	M	DeMarco v. DeMarco, 2005 CanLII 6389 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets restraining order continued, pleadings struck
Lofchik	M	Cs	M	F	Galambos v. Towers, 2006 CanLII 29661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	44.7	Divorce action no children, wife asks for 60.4 K and gets 44.7 K
Lofchik	M	Cs	M	F	Galambos-Towers v. Towers, 2005 CanLII 44386 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Vague imputation of 20 K per year to underearning asset results in $ 200 per month spousal support, property equalization of 122 K to wife
Marshall	M	Cs	L	L	Goyal v. Singh, 2002 CanLII 2748 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Father given supervised access, wife makes allegations and denies access, court orders investigation by Office of the Childrens Lawyer
Marshall	M	Cs	M	F	Mancuso v. Mancuso, 2004 CanLII 43770 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	32.0	Mans divorce trial costs lowered to 32 K on appeal, 10 K costs for appeal
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Chapin v. Chapin, 2003 CanLII 2080 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	Support variation, $ 750 costs
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Motion unsuccessfully appealed 6 K costs
Matheson	M	Cs	F	M	Grant v. Grant, 2005 CanLII 47703 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on motion to vary support, man is unemployed, 53 K arrears, unstated costs
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	8.5	8.5 K spousal support lump sum
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Hines v. Hines, 2007 CanLII 2208 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.1	Support action, 3.1 K costs
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Loy v. Loy, 2005 CanLII 27606 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy against 8 K per month support
Matheson	M	Cs	sr	M	Majkut-Giammarco v. Giammarco, 2004 CanLII 34797 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Denied trial
Matheson	M	Cs	sr	M	Niro v. Niro, 2004 CanLII 5068 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husbands claim against his ex wife and lawyers for fraud is struck
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	103.4	Divorce action with 9 days of trial involving constructive trust, 103.4 K costs
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Man uses false information to get exclusive possession at ex parte hearing, costs 103 K
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Parnell v. Viger, 2005 CanLII 8665 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Equalization and costs secured against home, and house to be sold if man loses.
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Rawlins v. Rawlins, 2006 CanLII 28560 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.7	Variation, wife asks 25.7 K and gets 8.7 K
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Richards v. Burch, 2003 CanLII 2223 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, both charged with assault, charges against wife withdrawn, man signs peace bond, wife gets custody
Mazza	M	Cs	M	F	Barrick v. Barrick, 2006 CanLII 1317 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	8.0	Man goes bankrupt, claims 32 K, imputed to 40 K, Must pay 1 K per month spousal support
Mazza	M	Cs	M	M	Juvatopolos v. Juvatopolos, 2004 CanLII 34843 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man imputed to 50 K, wife underemployed and reduced from receiving 1.4 K to 1.2 K, then enters another relationship and support reduced to $ 400, wife mild
Mazza	M	Cs	M	sr	Reitsma v. Reitsma-Leadsom, 2005 CanLII 47609 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault and then breach of probation, assault used as a reason for extending spousal support
Pazaratz	M	Cs	sr	F	Damian v. Damian, 2007 CanLII 18021 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.6	Divorce action, wife asks 15.2 K and gets 10.6 K
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	sr	Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	Man intentionally unemployed imputed to 55 K, wife imputed to 32 K, Man pays $ 800 per month in support, wife mild
Quinn JW	M	Cs	F	M	J.B. v. A.B., 2006 CanLII 12294 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man fired from job imputed to 50 K per year
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	M	J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	46.0	Man accused of being abusive and threatening lawyer and assessor, court orders termination of access and restrictions on motions, 46 K costs
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	M	J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man accused of being abusive and threatening lawyer and assessor, court orders termination of access and restrictions on motions, 46 K costs
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	M	J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Unsupervised then a dozen motions on access before trial, supervised, more motions, access denied, must seek leave for more motions, mental illness, 46 K cost penalty wife makes allegations to Childrens Aid
Quinn JW	M	Cs	F	F	Logan v. Logan, 2004 CanLII 195 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.5	Interim motion for evidence, wife asks 1.5 K gets 0.5 K costs
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	M	Plett v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2199 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on mans motion because his settled intention has already been ruled
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	sr	Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man gets 2 counts of contempt for harassment order, suspended sentence, ordered to say something nice about the other party on access
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	M	Taylor v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 42952 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	10 K compensatory lump sum support, 19 K equalization
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	M	Taylor v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 42952 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets 2 restraining orders, man in jail for third breach misses trial, 19 K equalization, 10 K compensatory support
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	M	Worthington v. Worthington, 2000 CanLII 22469 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access changed to no access
Reilly	M	Cs	sr	sr	Mahood v. Mahood, 2005 CanLII 19841 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man given reasonable supervised access, complains of access denials, support increased
Reilly	M	Cs	M	F	Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault takes peace bond, wife gets custody, wife moves to Fiji
Reilly	M	Cs	M	F	Reid v. Mulder, 2006 CanLII 9981 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.4	Divorce action, wife allowed to move to fiji with child, no costs for custody but 6.4 K for financial
Scime	M	Cs	M	F	Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 11194 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	10 K lump sum for spousal support arrears
Scime	M	Cs	M	F	Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 25103 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	75.0	Divorce, wife asks 117 K and gets 75 K, husband asks 306 K
Sheppard	M	Cs	sr	L	Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of home, non harassment order, interim custody
Sheppard	M	Cs	sr	L	Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets exclusive possession of home, non harassment order, interim custody
Sills	M	Cs	sr	M	Bolentiru v. Radulescu, 2004 CanLII 34775 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.6	Divorce action marriage declared invalid, wife asks 45.4 K gets 20.6 K
Sills	M	Cs	sr	M	Bolentiru v. Radulescu, 2004 CanLII 6239 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	27.5	15 K and 12.5 K for damages. Marriage declared invalid
Sills	M	Cs	M	sr	Demetriou v. Demetriou, 2006 CanLII 16364 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	7.0	$ 222 child support and $ 400 spousal support, man claims income of 18 K and is imputed to 25 K and wife makes 16.3 K
Sills	M	Cs	sr	M	Loebsack v. Loebsack, 2004 CanLII 16872 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Divorce action, wife gets 5 K costs
Sills	M	Cs	M	M	Roseneck v. Gowling, 2002 CanLII 45128 (ON C.A.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Steinberg	M	Cs	sr	sr	Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs of interim motion
Steinberg	M	Cs	sr	M	F.(J.) v. C.(V.) (No. 7), 2002 CanLII 46717 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	90.0	Divorce action with 73 day trial, wife asks 290 K and gets 90 K
Steinberg	M	Cs	M	M	Roach v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 1991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of harassment, wife cuts his access to his child, man beats up wife’s boyfriend and is put in jail, restraining order access to child terminated.
Steinburg	M	Cs	M	M	Roach v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 1991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access, criminal harassment and assault charges, jailed, access terminated by court order
Taliano	M	Cs	M	M	Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	32.0	Man claims 41 K income and is imputed to 73 K, variation denied, drivers license taken away
Taliano	M	Cs	M	sr	Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Lump sum but less than requested. Court overrules separation agreement for default in payments
Taliano	M	Cs	M	sr	Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K
Taliano	M	Cs	M	sr	Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	35.0	Lump sum of 35 K which is less than originally ordered. Court overrules separation agreement
Taliano	M	Cs	M	sr	Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	78.0	Man claims income of 61 K per year and is imputed to 139 K
Taliano	M	Cs	sr	F	Wiltshire v. Wiltshire, 2005 CanLII 370 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	41.0	41 K lump sum to be paid for arrears of support equalization and costs
Taliano	M	Cs	M	M	Zeoli v. Field, 2003 CanLII 2361 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		False allegations and criminal charges lead to supervised access, custody eventually reversed to father
Taylor	M	Cs	M	M	Martin v. Blanchard, 2007 CanLII 26611 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.7	Spousal support 2 day trial, 15.7 K
Turnbull	M	Cs	sr	F	Beal v. Beal, 2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	22.5	Wife gets 22. 5 K costs for divorce action which is roughly equal to what she owes husband for equalization
Turnbull	M	Cs	sr	F	Beal v. Beal, 2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man claims his company doesn’t make a profit and is imputed to 35 K, arrears 19 K, wife is unemployed and imputed to 19 K, $ 500 per month spousal support no children
Turnbull	M	Cs	sr	F	Beal v. Beal, 2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of pension benefits including death benefits
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Hachey v. Hachey, 2007 CanLII 52987 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 90 K, wife claims 14 K per year and is imputed to 35 K, 1 K per month spousal support 0.7 K child support, 3 K costs of interim motion
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Hachey v. Hachey, 2007 CanLII 52987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 90 K
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	F	Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 35629 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.8	Wife asks 45 K and gets 2.8 K in divorce action
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	F	Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 9601 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 250 per month spousal support, $ 839 per month child support
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	F	Mitton v. Mitton, 2007 CanLII 4323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.4	Support motion, 7.4 K costs, 4 K retroactive support
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 30710 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest on part of equalization
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 46745 (ON S.C.	mj	Cts	39.0	Divorce action, husband declares bankruptcy, 39 K costs, 30 K is related to support and survives bankruptcy.
Turnbull	M	Cs	sr	M	Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	11.0	11 K costs of support variation, 20 K arrears, 10 K s.7 arrears, husband declared bankruptcy, imputed income
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	F	S.D. v. R.D., 2006 CanLII 35978 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man accused of sexually abusing infant daughter first gets supervised access then access is terminated despite passing a lie detector
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	19.0	Man declares 46 K but is imputed to 65 K for not working overtime
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	10 K lump for final settlement of spousal support, intentionally unemployed due to not working overtime
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	F	Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Mans share of home held as security for support, 10 K lump to settle spousal support, imputed income for not working overtime, man must designate children as beneficiary of life insurance policy
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Young v. Staruck, 2006 CanLII 28111 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.1	Child support variation, 4.1 K
Whitten	M	Cs	sr	L	Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man is unemployed imputed vto former 58 K income $ 1650 per month support
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	23.3	Man is intentionally unemployed and has an income imputed to him, he declares 6.7 K and is imputed to 30 K, changed to 16.5 K on appeal
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Drygala v. Pauli, 2003 CanLII 48241 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs of trial and 9.5 K costs of appeal, and 1.5 K costs of stay motion, all to be enforced by FRO, 6 K security for appeal
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Grant v. Stemmler, 2006 CanLII 9972 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Interim motion 4 K costs
Whitten	M	Cs	F	M	Shamblaw v. Anger, 2005 CanLII 44380 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Support determination 1 K costs
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 CanLII 44981 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	10.3	10.3 K costs 69 K arrears, 274 K equalization payment, upheld on appeal , 22.5 K costs of appeal
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 CanLII 41990 (ON C.A.)	mj	Pr		Prejudgment interest on 274 K equalization payment, upheld on appeal, 22.5 K costs of appeal
Whitten	M	Cs	M	M	Weismiller v. Jolkowski, 2000 CanLII 22518 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	7.8	Man imputed 7.8 K, 10 % of income for history of bonuses

2) Penalties Against Women

Millanetti	F	Cs	M	sr	S.D. v. T.D., 2005 CanLII 23681 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, pleadings struck, ex parte motion, supervised access
Tucker	F	Cs	sr	M	Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive lump sum for support, imputed income
Tucker	F	Cs	M	F	St. Louis v. St. Louis, 2007 CanLII 11730 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, husband seeks 21 K gets 10 K
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Belanger v. Belanger, 2005 CanLII 30867 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.5	9.5 K costs of support variation against wife, husband has custody
Cavarzan	M	Cs	M	M	Collins v. Trimble, 2005 CanLII 25109 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		After separation wife charged with assault, man gets custody
Cavarzan	M	Cs			Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man gets exclusive possession provided he pays 50 K deposit on equalization, wife gets kids and support
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	F	Graham v. Kuntz, 2005 CanLII 44387 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	Support variation, 9 K costs
Festeryga	M	Cs	M	M	Harrington v. Harrington, 2007 CanLII 27754 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	89.0	Divorce action, husband asks 129 K gets 89 K
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	Debruyn v. Debruyn, 2005 CanLII 11206 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.5	Divorce action, wife gets 9.5 K costs and her lawyer gets 5 K costs and can’t bill wife for trial time
Flynn	M	Cs	F	sr	Duquette v. Gregorio, 2006 CanLII 32615 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.4	Motion for expanded access, 2.4 K costs
Flynn	M	Cs	M	M	Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 16229 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.0	Husband asks 58 K and gets 16 K in support variation
Flynn	M	Cs	F	M	Munro v. Munro, 2005 CanLII 22142 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion, wife and lawyer don’t attend first motion, 3 K costs to wife, 1 K costs to wifes lawyer
Flynn	M	Cs	M	F	Rossi v. Rossi, 2005 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	35.0	3 day trial of support variation, 35 K cost penalty
Flynn	M	Cs	M	sr	S.D. v. T.D., 2005 CanLII 23681 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Wife pleadings struck, uncontested trial, man gets custody, restraining order, 7.5 K costs
Glithero	M	Cs	F	M	Balaban v. Balaban, 2007 CanLII 7990 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.4	Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs
Glithero	M	Cs	M	M	Cornaz v. Cornaz-Nikyuluw, 2005 CanLII 47770 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	31.0	Hague convention case to return child to husband, husband asks 62 K gets 31 K
Glithero	M	Cs	F	sr	Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	13.6	Divorce action 13.6 K costs
Glithero	M	Cs	M	M	Visneskie v. Visneskie, 2003 CanLII 2264 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	45.5	Divorce action, husband asks for 54.5 K and gets 45.5 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Takis v. Takis, 2003 CanLII 2256 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	32.0	Divorce action, husband asks 64 K and gets 32 K
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Lindahl v. Lindahl, 2005 CanLII 34583 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, children live in home man and wife switch each week, wife moves to US and court allows her mobility while she has children
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2006 CanLII 32637 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	32.0	Interim motions, wife claims 115 K paid to lawyers, husband claims 60 K, 32 K costs
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion and harassment order, wife gets support
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Neither oppose mutual non harassment and non depletion orders, older sons live with man, no custody or child support order, 3.2 K per month spousal support to wife
Gordon D	M	Cs	Sr	M	Purves v. Purves, 2004 CanLII 6249 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, fathers income imputed from 18 to 25 K per year
Gordon D	M	Cs	L	L	Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	45.0	Wife imputed to 42 K. Man has custody but pays wife $ 185 per month total support, minor
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 19785 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion, 3 K costs
Gordon D	M	Cs	M	M	Stockie v. Stockie, 2003 CanLII 2352 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motion, 2 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs			Balaban v. Balaban, 2004 CanLII 47801 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	8.4	Wife imputed 8.4 K rental income, wife recieves 1.5 K per month support
Hambly	M	Cs	M	F	Bjornson v. Creighton, 2007 CanLII 14321 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts		Interim motion, 1.5 K costs
Hambly	M	Cs	M	sr	Girard v. Girard, 2007 CanLII 28740 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.1	Interim access motion not needed, costs to husband $ 100
Hambly	M	Cs	M	sr	Hockey-Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2002 CanLII 2721 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	200.0	Divorce action, wife acts unreasonably, 200 K costs asnd 15 K costs of appeal, husband gets custody and must pay 5 K per month spousal support
Hambly	M	Cs	F	M	Tucker v. Tucker, 2002 CanLII 2761 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.2	Motion to vary support, 5.2 K costs
Harris	M	Cs	sr	M	Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 43349 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, wifes lawyer doesn’t respond, 1.5 K costs
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man uses false information to get exclusive possession at ex parte hearing, costs 103 K
Matheson	M	Cs	M	M	Richards v. Burch, 2003 CanLII 2223 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, both charged with assault, charges against wife withdrawn, man signs peace bond, wife gets custody
Mazza	M	Cs	M	M	Juvatopolos v. Juvatopolos, 2004 CanLII 34843 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man imputed to 50 K, wife underemployed and reduced from receiving 1.4 K to 1.2 K, then enters another relationship and support reduced to $ 400, wife mild
Mazza	M	Cs	F	M	Raguckas v. Raguckas, 2007 CanLII 2360 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.7	Divorce action, 40.7 K
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	sr	Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Woman gets 30 days jail for selling farm her husband lived on, must pay the 22 K withheld to husband
Quinn JW	M	Cs	sr	sr	Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	32.0	Man intentionally unemployed imputed to 55 K, wife imputed to 32 K, Man pays $ 800 per month in support, wife mild
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	sr	Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs for contempt motion
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	F	Kassay v. Kassay, 2000 CanLII 22444 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Wife found in contempt for denial of access, no consequences this time but jail if it happens again
Quinn JW	M	Cs	M	M	Riss v. Greenough, 2003 CanLII 2224 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.3	5.3 K for 2 motions
Taliano	M	Cs	M	F	Calvert v. Calvert, 2002 CanLII 2706 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man gets exclusive possession, he must pay wife $ 500 per month spousal support
Turnbull	M	Cs	sr	F	Beal v. Beal, 2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	19.0	Man claims his company doesn’t make a profit and is imputed to 35 K, arrears 19 K, wife is unemployed and imputed to 19 K, $ 500 per month spousal support no children
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	L	Bolduc v. Bolduc, 2006 CanLII 35976 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	Trial, husband claims 25 K gets 15 K
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	sr	Mizzau v. Barnes, 2006 CanLII 21596 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	6.0	Wife declares a 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K and must pay child support, some recission of arrears for period of unemployment
Turnbull	M	Cs	M	M	Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 8024 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	Interim motion, 0.8 K costs

Central West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Cw – Central West Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Baltman	F	Cw	6	3	4	2	0	0	0	0
Coats	F	Cw	6	4	5	4	1	0	0	0
Seppi	F	Cw	14	2	8	2	3	0	0	0
Snowie	F	Cw	14	5	9	3	12	4	7	1
Van Melle	F	Cw	14	5	12	4	1	0	0	0
Wein	F	Cw	11	4	8	2	5	0	1	0
Belleghem	M	Cw	15	4	9	2	6	1	1	0
Corbett	M	Cw	14	1	12	1	3	0	1	0
Fragomeni	M	Cw	28	4	15	4	5	0	0	0
Kruzick	M	Cw	10	6	7	5	1	0	1	0
Langdon	M	Cw	9	2	5	0	2	0	0	0
Mackenzie	M	Cw	7	1	4	1	1	0	0	0
Murray	M	Cw	11	8	9	7	2	0	0	0
O’Connor	M	Cw	2	1	1	1	1	0	0	0
Quigley	M	Cw	3	2	3	2	1	1	1	1
Sproat	M	Cw	4	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
Thomas	M	Cw	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	0
Thompson	M	Cw	5	3	3	3	1	0	0	0
Tulloch	M	Cw	7	2	5	2	6	1	0	0

Female Judges	6	65	23	46	17	22	4	8	1
Male judges	13	117	36	75	30	30	3	4	1
Total	19	182	59	121	47	52	7	12	2

Central West Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 0

N = 18 Mean = 90.0 Total = 1620

2.600 3.900 5.000 7.000 9.000 9.000 9.100 19.30 25.00 25.00 26.00 30.00 38.00 42.00 44.00 100.0 225.0 1000.

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 39 Mean = 52.7 Total = 2054.1

5.000 5.000 9.000 10.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.30 16.00 20.00 20.80 22.00 22.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 33.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 43.00 50.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 55.00 64.00 74.00 77.00 80.00 85.00 115.0 120.0 172.0 400.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 43 Mean = 51.5 Total = 2214.5

0.4000 0.8000 0.9000 1.500 1.500 1.700 1.700 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 3.000 3.300 3.500 5.500 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.500 7.200 7.200 8.000 8.200 8.600 9.200 9.500 10.00 10.00 10.90 19.50 19.50 31.50 34.00 34.00 38.00 38.00 48.00 48.60 117.0 183.0 183.8 275.0 997.7

Female Cost Penalties

N = 16 Mean = 23.2 Total = 371.2

0.2000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.000 5.800 6.100 6.300 12.00 12.00 12.00 13.70 14.50 21.60 252.9

Central West Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Baltman	F	Cw	M	M	Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	43.0	Man claims 34 K and is imputed to 77 K
Baltman	F	Cw	sr	M	Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K costs of motion
Baltman	F	Cw	sr	M	Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Claims 22 K imputed to 37 K, retroactive arrears
Baltman	F	Cw	sr	M	Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	3.9	3.9 K lump sum for expenses for delay of sale of home
Baltman	F	Cw	M	F	Mantella v. Mantella, 2005 CanLII 26320 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.9	Motion to set aside separation agreement, wife asks 31.5 K and gets 10.9 K
Baltman	F	Cw	M	M	Martins v. Martins, 2006 CanLII 24242 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.2	Motion to set arrears, wife claims 13.6 K and gets 7.2 K costs
Coats	F	Cw	sr	M	L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	Man intentionally unemployed is imputed to 55 K which was maximum preseparation income
Coats	F	Cw	sr	M	L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order granted, 16 charges related to protesting divorce laws, wife the complaintant, convicted of assault and threatening wife, flagrant disregard for court orders and judicial system, imputed income, supervised access to children cut
Coats	F	Cw	sr	M	L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Protesting against divorce system, 16 criminal charges, walks out on trial, arrears 35 K, income imputed at 40 K, supervised access would be allowed, he has declined
Coats	F	Cw	F	F	Leyland v. Baillie, 2006 CanLII 9311 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, wife gets house and support, house later sold
Coats	F	Cw	F	F	Patan v. Patan, 2004 CanLII 50070 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K retroactive support and 2.5 K per month
Coats	F	Cw	sr	F	Sherwood v. Sherwood, 2006 CanLII 40795 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	51.0	Man claims 40 K per year and is imputed to 91 K,
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	19.3	19.3 K lump sum for retroactive support to be paid from mans share of home
Seppi	F	Cw	L	L	Gill v. Gill, 2006 CanLII 8467 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs for interim motion
Seppi	F	Cw	sr	L	Helmy v. Helmy, 2000 CanLII 22452 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	1000.0	Over 1 million in damages for conspiracy and punitive damages, fraudulent conveyance, lottery winnings added back to net family property
Seppi	F	Cw	sr	L	Helmy v. Helmy, 2000 CanLII 22452 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Prejudgment interest on equalization over a million, over a million in damage awards
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Hicks v. Hicks, 2002 CanLII 49566 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man will designate wife as beneficiary of insurance as security for support, business not exluded from equalization adding 750 K, home transferred to wife
Seppi	F	Cw	F	F	Jardine v. Jardine, 2002 CanLII 2749 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	9.0	Prejudgment interest, constructive trust or equalization, 1.7 K per month spousal support, 9 K retroactive lump sum, parties not married
Seppi	F	Cw	F	F	Jardine v. Jardine, 2002 CanLII 2749 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest, constructive trust or equalization, 1.7 K per month spousal support, 9 K retroactive lump sum, parties not married
Seppi	F	Cw	M	F	Katsigannis v. Kottick-Katsigannis, 2000 CanLII 16999 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		17 K security released to wife
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	MJhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, man is in contempt, 10 K penalty, 15 K trust for security for support to be made, wife gets custody
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Sobotka v. Sobotka, 2005 CanLII 3399 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	9.0	9 K lump for past s.7 expenses
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Sobotka v. Sobotka, 2005 CanLII 3399 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 63 K equalization
Seppi	F	Cw	M	F	Stewart v. Jones, 2003 CanLII 2251 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Imputed income of 30 K upheld on appeal, s.7 expenses disallowed, no costs
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Trick v. Trick, 2006 CanLII 22926 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	117.0	117 K costs for divorce action
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Trick v. Trick, 2006 CanLII 22926 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	225.0	225 K lump sum for retroactive child support, settlement agreement overturned, 2.2 K per month total support, claims he’s almost impecuous
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged and accused dozens of times, wife gets custody then loses custody then denied access
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Freezing order upheld on motion to set aside by Van Melle J
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	sr	Birkett v. Birkett, 2003 CanLII 1937 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	sr	Cavic v. Carroccia, 2006 CanLII 28554 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.7	$1650 for interim motion
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	Islam v. Rahman, 2006 CanLII 22137 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	183.0	183 K costs of divorce action, 36 K of costs enforceable by FRO
Snowie	F	Cw	M	F	Kushnir v. Lowry, 2005 CanLII 20713 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	77.0	7 million equalization, 35 K per month retroative spousal support, man declares 30 K income and court finds he spent 107 monthly
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	M	Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	10.0	Man claims average 8.5 K income over 8 years and is imputed an average 10 K per year
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	M	Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	38.0	38 K lump sum for arrears and future support, short marriage, charging order for security
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	M	Lawrence v. Mortensen, 2000 CanLII 22525 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		38 K lump sum for arrears and future support, short marriage, charging order for security
Snowie	F	Cw	M	F	Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	997.7	Divorce action, 997.7 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal, 20 K more costs
Snowie	F	Cw	M	F	Reid v. Reid, 2005 CanLII 20793 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Lump sum obtained from estate of deceased ex husband
Snowie	F	Cw	M	F	Reid v. Reid, 2005 CanLII 2743 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	19.5	Divorce action, wife spends 62 K and gets 19.5 K
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	Walsh v. Walsh, 2003 CanLII 2268 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion, wife asks 4.5 K gets 3 K
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	Walsh v. Walsh, 2003 CanLII 2268 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	42.0	Lump sum of 42 K retroactive arrears
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	M	Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		250 K to be retained by the court as security for wifes claims, 5.7 K per month total support, 265 K equalization, 610 K paid out to Revenue Canada
Van Melle	F	Cw	sr	F	Beitel v. Beitel, 2006 CanLII 60944 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man claims less than 10 K per year income and is imputed to 182 K, house vested with wife for arrears
Van Melle	F	Cw	sr	F	Beitel v. Beitel, 2006 CanLII 60944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	172.0	Man claims less than 10 K per year income and is imputed to 182 K, house vested with wife for arrears
Van Melle	F	Cw	sr	M	Bhasin v. Bhasin, 2006 CanLII 3270 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		100 K of mans assets frozen, man claims hardship and must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support
Van Melle	F	Cw			Dumny v. Dumyn, 2005 CanLII 11784 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Summary judgment overturned on appeal
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	F	Islam v. Rahman, 2006 CanLII 22137 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	183.8	Divorce action, 183.8 K
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	M	Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	M	Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	M	Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Man claims 27 K income and is imputes to 58 K
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	M	Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Contempt for failure to pay support and violation of harassment order 10 K cost penalty, motion for variation dismissed, 15 K security deposit
Van Melle	F	Cw	sr	sr	Jordan v. Martins, 2004 CanLII 19145 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.4	0.2 K costs interim motion plus accrued interest of 0.2 K
Van Melle	F	Cw	F	M	Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	Man claims average 55 K income and is imputed to 80 K
Van Melle	F	Cw	sr	sr	Schwabe v. Schwabe, 2005 CanLII 37005 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.0	5 K lump payment for s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears
Van Melle	F	Cw	M	F	Wright v. Wright, 2004 CanLII 19944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Unemployed man imputed to 40 K per year, RRSP vested to wife for arrears
Wein	F	Cw	M	M	Chaudhry v. Chaudhry, 2003 CanLII 2005 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.2	Interim motion, wife asks 46 K gets 9.2 K
Wein	F	Cw	L	L	Federici v. Therrien, 2004 CanLII 5037 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.2	Mans claim for a constructive trust dismissed 7.2 K costs
Wein	F	Cw	L	L	Hewat v. Hewat, 2003 CanLII 2131 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	5.0	Man claims 165 K income and is imputed to 170 K, wife imputed to 25 K in 3 months and support drops from 5.5 K per month to 4.5 K.
Wein	F	Cw	F	M	McLean v. Vassel, 2004 CanLII 33012 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.5	9.5 K for support variation including one of 2 interim motions, wife requested 88 K
Wein	F	Cw	F	M	McLean v. Vassel, 2004 CanLII 4031 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default on support, denied variation
Wein	F	Cw	M	F	Ramcharitar v. Ramcharitar, 2003 CanLII 1997 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Wife asks for 55 K partial or 98 K full and gets 34 K, post divorce action for custody access.
Wein	F	Cw	sr	L	S.R.S. v. A.H.H., 2003 CanLII 2254 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	22.0	Unemployed man who has children during the day and every second weekend must pay employed wife $ 227 spousal support, income equal to wife imputed at 22 K per year
Wein	F	Cw	M	L	S.R.S. v. A.H.H., 2004 CanLII 5038 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.2	Husband unemployed and retraining, 8.2 K cost penalty
Wein	F	Cw	sr	F	Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	2.6	2.5 K lump sum due within 14 days for arrears of child support, support increased to 1.3 K
Wein	F	Cw	sr	F	Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		165 K insurance policy to be held in trust, 2.5 K lump to cover support arrears, joint custody removed, child support increased to 1.3 K per month
Wein	F	Cw	sr	F	Wentzell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 4032 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	19.5	Trial cancelled due to agreement but husband gets 19.5 K costs for contempt motion withdrawn at last moment.
Bellegham	M	Cw	M	F	J.D.K v. K.W.B.K, 2005 CanLII 38100 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	48.0	Divorce action, wife asks 73 K gets 48 K
Bellegham	M	Cw	M	F	Peters v. Peters, 2003 CanLII 2198 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest on equalization at 2/3 the rate
Belleghem	M	Cw	F	M	Arenovich v. Arenovich, 2006 CanLII 17323 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Husband must maintain an insurance policy as security for support
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	F	Beitel v. Beitel, 2004 CanLII 10698 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man given non depletion order, commits perjury about financial situation, request for advance on equalization denied as he might go bankrupt, criminal charges
Belleghem	M	Cw	sr	L	Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	7.0	Ordered to pay 7 K of support arrears in lump sum
Belleghem	M	Cw	sr	sr	Felte v. Felte, 2003 CanLII 2118 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	100.0	Man to pay 100 K lump sum on equalization and 75 K lump sum on spousal support or 1.5 K per month, appeal dismissed
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	F	Peters v. Peters, 2003 CanLII 2198 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	38.0	Divorce action, divided success wife gets at least 38 K costs
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	M	Savage v. Pemberton Savage, 2004 CanLII 48868 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Motion to vary support dismissed 2.5 K costs
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	F	Schmidt v. Seidel, 2003 CanLII 2417 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	22.0	Man acquitted of assault charges at separation, joint custody agreement, claims 118 K income and is imputed to 140 K, mutual restraining and non depletion orders on consent
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2246 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims less than 100 K income and is imputed to 140 K, wife gets 5 K per month support
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2247 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house and support
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Wells v. Wells, 2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	7.5 K spousal support per month, 5.6 K child support per month and maximum 675 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 350 K income and is imputed to 400 K
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Wells v. Wells, 2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man won’t attend at matrimonial home except for access, restraining order instead of exclusive possession, 13.5 K per month support
Belleghem	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.)	mj	F		Mutual non depletion order, non depletion continued after trial for man, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income
Bellighem	M	Cw	sr	F	Schmidt v. Seidel, 2004 CanLII 17443 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.9	Custody variation. joint custody changed to sole custody to wife, claims wife is alienating children, denied an assessment, $ 850 costs
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Bullock v. Bullock, 2004 CanLII 16949 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs for motion
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Bullock v. Bullock, 2004 CanLII 16949 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	120.0	Man takes early retirement at age 62, court says he is underemployed and imputes 120 K per year income, no variation of arrears
Corbett	M	Cw	L	L	Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, 2.2 K per month child support and 1.9 K child support, non depletion order
Corbett	M	Cw	L	L	Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual non depletion order, man to pay wife support, wife gets house, mans share of family home held for security
Corbett	M	Cw	M	F	Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans interest in home to be held as security and non depletion of RRSP
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Eagle v. Eagle, 2004 CanLII 2561 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K lump sum for support arrears, refused variation, 2.5 K per month support
Corbett	M	Cw	sr	sr	Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order not to see children continued
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Iddon v. Iddon, 2006 CanLII 1450 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	36.0	Man is unemployed and is imputed to 36 K per year, variation refused
Corbett	M	Cw	M	F	J.K. v. J.A.K., 2004 CanLII 16080 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Sexual assault allegations, no charges, supervised access ordered, an assessment ordered to see if access can be unsupervised, some conditions relaxed
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Mantella v. Mantella, 2006 CanLII 17337 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	38.0	Man sues wife and her divorce lawyer, 14 K plus 1 K for cost submission to wife, 22 K plus 1 K cost submission to lawyer
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.3	Man claims 12.7 K income inputed to 28 K
Corbett	M	Cw	M	F	Procyk v. Procyk, 2006 CanLII 18370 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	85.0	3.5 K per month spousal support, 70 K and 35 K lump sums, man claims 65 K income but is imputed to 150 K, wife remarries man who makes 142 K per year
Corbett	M	Cw	F	M	Salvador v. Salvador, 2004 CanLII 5861 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Only seen daughters 2 times in 2 years for 5 minute supervised access, extensive court and assessment delays, access motion adjourned and supervised access continued
Corbett	M	Cw	L	L	Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2004 CanLII 36132 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs for motion
Fragomen	M	Cw	M	F	Lowe v. Lowe, 2006 CanLII 729 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man imputed for future business, wife not imputed for child support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	sr	F	Balram v. Balram, 2003 CanLII 15395 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man becomes unemployed and variation refused
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Bertolin v. Flavelle, 2004 CanLII 10705 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possesion of home and interim custody
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Bertolin v. Flavelle, 2004 CanLII 10705 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Court gives wife exclusive possession of family home until sale, 1.5 K per month spousal support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non dissipation order
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Bradley v. Bradley, 2003 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wife gets 6.5 K for interim motion
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Collin v. Collin, 2005 CanLII 48919 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Support variation, divided success, wife gets 1.5 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	74.0	Man claims 65 K and is imputed to 139 K, non dissipation order
Fragomeni	M	Cw	sr	M	Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man works on contract for over 100 K then is unemployed, income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Elder v. Elder, 2005 CanLII 48920 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, home sold, wife gets 2 K per month support and may use family assets for medical treatment
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Elder v. Elder, 2006 CanLII 3276 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Motion to vary support, husband asks 10.3 K and wife gets 3.5 K
Fragomeni	M	Cw	F	F	Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order, husband pays 4 K per month total support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	F	F	Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife is charged with assault and says man assaulted her, court gives mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 4 K per month total support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Interim motion, 2.5 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Lowe v. Lowe, 2006 CanLII 3280 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Motion, 6 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.7	Interim motion 1.7 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	$ 507 per month child support and $ 100 per month spousal support, 16.5 K arrears, man claims 40 K and is imputed to 60 K
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		7.5 K to be held by lawyer as security ordered paid to wife
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	F	Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife has interim exclusive possession of home and custody and support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Rae v. Rae, 2006 CanLII 33674 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	64.0	2 K per month interim spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 110 K
Fragomeni	M	Cw	F	M	Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Man claims 35 K income imputed to 50 K, 162 K arrears to be paid from house, 50 K to be held as security
Fragomeni	M	Cw	F	M	Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man claims 35 K income imputed to 50 K, 162 K arrears to be paid from house, 50 K to be held as security
Fragomeni	M	Cw	sr	F	Trick v. Trick, 2005 CanLII 48923 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Wifes motion for husbands non compliance, vesting order, upheld on appeal, 10 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	sr	F	Trick v. Trick, 2005 CanLII 48923 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Wifes motion for husbands non compliance, vesting order, upheld on appeal, 10 K costs
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	9.1	9.1 K lump for retroactive support for one child to be paid from equalization, support of other child adjourned
Kruzick	M	Cw	M	F	Finch v. Finch, 2003 CanLII 9776 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Support variation, wife asks for 23 K and gets 6 K
Kruzick	M	Cw	M	F	Gill v. Gill, 2006 CanLII 8467 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	0.75 K for interim motion
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Rachiele v. Rachiele, 2005 CanLII 32920 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans civil claims and motion to vary support dismissed
Kruzick	M	Cw	L	L	Starr v. Starr, 2004 CanLII 18698 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	115.0	Man claims a 70 K income and is imputed to 185 K
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 12975 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Seizure of property order, pleadings struck, prejudgment interest, uncontested trial
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	275.0	16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 275 K costs including appeal
Kruzick	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 275 K costs including appeal
Kruzick	M	Cw	M	M	Wilson-Embree v. Embree, 2007 CanLII 36636 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	52.0	Man claims 48 K and is imputed to 100 K, 20.6 K retroactive arrears
Langdon	M	Cw	M	M	Camilleri v. Camilleri, 2000 CanLII 22465 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		1.8 K support, 20 K arrears. Charging order against mans home, vaeiation denied
Langdon	M	Cw	L	L	Erwin v. Erwin, 2004 CanLII 5046 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Set aside after trial but he gets equalization
Langdon	M	Cw	F	F	Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in multiple contempt, charging order on house, sentencing hearing
Langdon	M	Cw	F	F	Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man unemployed is imputed to 60 K then to 100 K, total support of 2.15 K per month to be paid to wife, wife imputed to 20 K, wife mild
Langdon	M	Cw	F	F	Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	44.0	Lump sum of 44 K for support arrears, 2.5 K per month total support, contempt for not returning children on time, wife separates by abducting children and gets custody, mans proceeds from sale of house to be held as security, vesting order on RRSP, imputed income
Langdon	M	Cw	F	F	Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order on house as security for support, vesting order on RRSP for equalization, sentencing hearing for contempt, imputed income
Langdon	M	Cw	L	L	Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 2002 CanLII 2792 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Motion to change jurisdiction, 6 K costs
Langdon	M	Cw	I(ex)	M	Sangster v. Sangster, 2003 CanLII 48248 (ON C.A.)	mn	D		Default set aside on appeal
Langdon	M	Cw	ex	L	Wedgbury v. Wedgbury, 2006 CanLII 10531 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets ex parte order for custody and exclusive possession of home, wife denies access and husband is later given custody and exclusive possession
Mackenzie	M	Cw	L	L	Dumoulin v. Dumoulin, 2004 CanLII 824 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Access to child must be supervised by another adult, supervision removed after man proves himself not taking drugs
Mackenzie	M	Cw	M	M	Fancett v. Deprato, 2006 CanLII 2402 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Wife asks for 68 K and gets 34 K for divorce action
Mackenzie	M	Cw	sr	M	G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	26.0	26 K lump sum for child and spousal support to be taken from proceeds of home
MacKenzie	M	Cw	F	M	Irwin v. Irwin, 2005 CanLII 8725 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Defaults on extraordinary expense, separation agreement upheld
Mackenzie	M	Cw	F	M	Irwin v. Irwin, 2005 CanLII 8725 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Mans income imputed at 33 K
Mackenzie	M	Cw	F	M	Irwin v. Irwin, 2006 CanLII 5451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	31.5	Divorce action, wife claims 47 K and gets 31.5 K, husband claims 42 K
Mackenzie	M	Cw	M	M	McGahey v. McGahey, 2006 CanLII 5456 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Murray	M	Cw	sr	F	Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Man unemployed imputed to 30 K and declared intentionally unemployed
Murray	M	Cw	sr	F	Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 3 years prejudgment interest on 110 K equalization payment
Murray	M	Cw	sr	F	Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	80.0	Man claims 30 K income and is imputed to 110 K, 3.5 K spousal support, arrears not rescinded
Murray	M	Cw	sr	F	Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 3 years prejudgment interest on 775 K
Murray	M	Cw	sr	M	Haaksma v. Haaksma, 2006 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets possession of home
Murray	M	Cw	M	M	Mergelos v. Mergelos, 2005 CanLII 13789 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans motion for equalization is dismissed by summary judgment
Murray	M	Cw	sr	M	Nanan v. Nanan, 2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.6	Claims 83 K imputed to 88 K, pays 1.5 K spousal support and 2 K mortgage, and 0.7 K child support, 8.6 K costs
Murray	M	Cw	sr	M	Nanan v. Nanan, 2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	5.0	Claims 83 K imputed to 88 K, pays 1.5 K spousal support and 2 K mortgage, and 0.7 K child support, 8.6 K costs
Murray	M	Cw	sr	sr	Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.8	$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K
Murray	M	Cw	M	M	Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Murray	M	Cw	M	M	Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man claims 75 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife gets home and custody and 4.5 K interim support
O’Conner	M	Cw	F	M	Johnson v. McFadyen, 2005 CanLII 8727 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
O’Connor	M	Cw	sr	F	Dobre v. Dobre, 2004 CanLII 17889 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		False domestic violence charges, supervised access, woman also accuses grandparents of threats
Quigley	M	Cw	M	M	Gainer v. Gainer, 2006 CanLII 12969 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	400.0	3.3 K per month spousal support, 22 K arrears, wife seeks 475 K for damages, both husband and wife are unemployed and court imputes 400 K to husband and 60 K to wife
Quigley	M	Cw	sr		Lawrie v. Turcotte, 2006 CanLII 12971 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on custody and spousal support, man may still have trial on supervised v unsupervised access
Quigley	M	Cw	sr	M	Lawrie v. Turcotte, 2006 CanLII 12971 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Criminal charges, no contact with child school ordered, supervised access at wifes discretion
Sproat	M	Cw	M	M	Benak v. Benak, 2006 CanLII 6906 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	48.6	Divorce action, wife gets 48.6 K costs
Sproat	M	Cw	L	L	Dobre v. Dobre, 2004 CanLII 17889 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife makes false allegations against man and grandparents, wife gets custody
Sproat	M	Cw	F	F	Hobbs v. Hobbs, 2007 CanLII 26282 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Success on motions divided, wife asks 53.5 K and gets 8 K
Sproat	M	Cw	M	F	Lemmon v. Lemmon, 2004 CanLII 24123 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.3	Divorce action, wife gets 3.3 K
Thomas	M	Cw	sr	F	Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual, man gets home, woman gets support, man violates non dissipation order, man has duty council assisting him
Thomas	M	Cw	sr	F	Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, non dissipation order, contempt hearing for man for trial for disposing of assets, wife gets custody and 1.8 K per month total support, man has duty council assisting him
Thompson	M	Cw	M	M	Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, wife gets support, house not mentioned, wife claims husband has given false income
Thompson	M	Cw	sr		Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	9.0	Man declares 4 K income imputed to 13 K, 6 K in s.7 expenses
Thompson	M	Cw	sr	M	Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Unsupervised access disallowed by wife, arrears of support, access terminated , charging order
Thompson	M	Cw	sr	F	Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Arrears of 13 K in child support, charging order put on land, access to child denied
Thompson	M	Cw	M	M	Tiraborelli v. Tiraborelli, 2004 CanLII 27352 (ON C.A.)	mn	Sc		5 K security for costs of action to be posted
Tulloch	M	Cw	ex	L	Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	37.0	Man intentionally unemployed for leaving the country, lump sum retroactive support, vesting order, made 8 K imputed to 45 K
Tulloch	M	Cw	ex	F	Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	30 K spousal lump sum payment plus 1K per month and 387 K retroactive child support, income imputed , intentionally unemployed
Tulloch	M	Cw	ex	L	Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man did not attend divorce trial, 30 K lump sum, 1 K per month spousal support, imputed income, vesting order against assets as security, full indemnity costs
Tulloch	M	Cw	F	F	L.P.G.M. v. J.M., 2006 CanLII 5455 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man catches wife changing locks on house and sprays liquid soap on her and mother, convicted of assault, wife tries to have him arrested 4 more times, 5 Children Aids complaints by wife, wife witholds access and is in contempt, sole custody changed to joint
Tulloch	M	Cw	L	L	Matti v. Matti, 2005 CanLII 39889 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Tulloch	M	Cw	M	F	Mwangi v. Wahome, 2004 CanLII 48888 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 1.5 K per month total support
Tulloch	M	Cw	M	F	Mwangi v. Wahome, 2004 CanLII 48888 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Interim restraining order due to history of assaultive behaviour,, wife gets custody, 1.5 K per month total support

2) Penalties Against Women

Blair		Cw	F	M	Bourque v. Haney, 2003 CanLII 2068 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.8	Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, asks 6.9 K gets 5.8 K
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 32619 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	252.9	Divorce action lasting 11 years where wife made numerous false allegations, 252.9 K costs
Coats	F	Cw	F	F	Leyland v. Baillie, 2006 CanLII 9311 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, wife gets house and support, house later sold
Fragomeni	F	Cw	F	F	Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual freezing order, man pays 4 K per month support
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2162 (ON S.C.)	mn	Js		Summary judgement on wifes child support motion overturned
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2162 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parties ask for restraining order, mans claim is accepted wifes claim dismissed, wife gets custody, wifes child support claim dismissed but reinstated on appeal.
Seppi	F	Cw	M	M	MJhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, man is in contempt, 10 K penalty, 15 K trust for security for support to be made, wife gets custody
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Woman found in contempt for false allegations and denial of access, custody given to man, 5 K penalty
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged and accused dozens of times, wife gets custody then loses custody then denied access
Snowie	F	Cw	M	M	A.F. v. I.V., 2006 CanLII 727 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Wife makes multiple false allegations resulting in 4 years of supervised access, man given custody and wife supervised access, contempt, 5 K fine
Snowie	F	Cw	sr	sr	Birkett v. Birkett, 2003 CanLII 1937 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house
Snowie	F	Cw	M	sr	D.J.C. v. N.C., 2004 CanLII 47783 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Found in contempt alienating man, 10 K cost penalty, 30 days if not paid
Snowie	F	Cw	M	sr	D.J.C. v. N.C., 2004 CanLII 47783 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	25.0	Wifes income imputed at 25 K, Mans income 196 K, wife recieves 4.9 K per month total support, mild
Snowie	F	Cw	M	sr	Euteneier v. Euteneier, 2007 CanLII 9609 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.3	6.3 K costs of motion, woman declared a vextacious litigant and must get leave of court to file
Snowie	F	Cw	F	F	L.G.P.M. v. J.M., 2003 CanLII 2329 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt for denial of access $ 500 fine
Snowie	F	Cw	F	F	Mancini v. Mancini, 2004 CanLII 9995 (ON C.A.)	mn	C		Woman found in contempt for denial of access, overturned on appeal
Snowie	F	Cw	F	F	Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Found in contempt for denial of access and false allegations, custody given to man, 14.5 K cost penalty
Snowie	F	Cw	F	F	Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	14.5	Found in contempt for denial of access and false allegations, custody given to man, 14.5 K cost penalty
Van Melle	F	Cw	F	M	Sekhon v. Jawanda, 2002 CanLII 2645 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Granted supervised access changed to unsupervised changed to interim custody, man and family found to be interferring with relationship
Wein	F	Cw	L	L	Hewat v. Hewat, 2003 CanLII 2131 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	25.0	Wife imputed to 25 K , combined spousal and child support reduced to 4.5 K per month from 5.5 K, mild
Wein	F	Cw	M	M	Lanfrey v. Lanfrey, 2003 CanLII 2326 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.2	Interim motion, $ 150, wife has not paid 6 K costs of trial which is under appeal
Wein	F	Cw	L	L	MacMillan v. MacMillan, 2002 CanLII 2685 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	14.0	Wife imputed from declared income of 6 K to 20 K, wife recieves total support of 4.5 K per month reduced from 5.25 K due to drop in mans income, mild
Wein	F	Cw	M	L	Stanley v. Stanley, 2003 CanLII 2351 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	13.7	Husband gets wifes action stayed 13.7 K costs
Wein	F	Cw	M	F	Voce v. Gibson, 2003 CanLII 778 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	12.0	12 K costs of trial overturned to 4 K on appeal
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	F	J.P.S.V. v. M.V., 2006 CanLII 10530 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Support variation, 2.5 K costs
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	sr	Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	12.0	Divorce action, husband asks 40 K costs and gets 12 K, 2 adjournments $ 1250
Belleghem	M	Cw	M	M	Shaw v. Shaw, 2005 CanLII 18878 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Non harassment order against wife, man gets custody
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2246 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion to set support, 3 K costs, wife gets 5 K per month support
Belleghem	M	Cw	L	L	Smolders v. Smolders, 2003 CanLII 2247 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order, wife gets house and support
Belleghem	M	Cw	sr	M	Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order continued against man after uncontested trial
Corbett	M	Cw	L	L	Damer-Basso v. Basso, 2003 CanLII 2055 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house, mans share of family home held for security
Corbett	M	Cw	M	F	Moudry v. Moudry, 2005 CanLII 22220 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2.0 K costs for interim motion
Corbett	M	Cw	M	M	Wedgbury v. Wedgbury, 2006 CanLII 10531 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife denies husband access and husband given exclusive possession of home and custody
Fragomeni	M	Cw	sr	M	Bhasin v. Bhasin, 2006 CanLII 3270 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wifes assets frozen later after husbands assets frozen, husband must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual freezing order, wife gets exclusive possession of home and 1.5 K spousal support per month
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Borralho v. Borralho, 2003 CanLII 2067 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Fragomeni	M	Cw	M	M	Elder v. Elder, 2005 CanLII 48920 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, home sold, wife gets 2 K per month support and may use family assets for medical treatment
Fragomeni	M	Cw	F	F	Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife is charged with assault and says man assaulted her, court gives mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 4 K per month total support
Kruzick	M	Cw	L	L	N.S. v. D.A.S., 2003 CanLII 2448 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access continued until wife has a mental exam, husband has custody
Langdon	M	Cw	F	F	Fang v. Fang, 2004 CanLII 13068 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Man unemployed is imputed to 60 K then to 100 K, total support of 2.15 K per month to be paid to wife, wife imputed to 20 K, wife mild
Langdon	M	Cw	L	L	Mikan v. Mikan, 2004 CanLII 5062 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		First wife gets exclusive possession and then it is reversed to father due to wifes denials of access. House then to be sold. Joint custody, mother pays father 1.4 K per month child support after set off
Mackenzie	M	Cw	M	M	McGahey v. McGahey, 2006 CanLII 5456 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Murray	M	Cw	M	F	Gazo v. Gazo, 2005 CanLII 3386 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.1	6.1 K costs for motion against wife, Wife obtains ex parte non depletion and seizure orders, overturned on appeal as court lacked jurisdiction
Murray	M	Cw	M	M	Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Quigly	M	Cw	M	sr	Walsh v. Walsh, 2007 ONCA 218 (CanLII)	mj	Cts	21.6	21.6 K costs of divorce action, upheld on appeal, 3.5 K costs of appeal, leave provision rescinded
Thomas	M	Cw	F	F	Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man gets home, woman gets support, man violates non dissipation order
Thomas	M	Cw	Sr	F	Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order, non dissipation order, contempt hearing for man for trial for disposing of assets, wife gets custody and 1.8 K per month total support, man has duty council assisting him
Thompson	M	Cw	M	M	Cunningham v. Montgomery-Cunningham, 2005 CanLII 36261 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, wife gets support, house not mentioned, wife claims husband has given false income
Tulloch	M	Cw	F	M	Finucan v. Finucan, 2006 CanLII 30590 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Motion, 3 K costs
Tulloch	M	Cw	F	F	L.P.G.M. v. J.M., 2006 CanLII 5455 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Finding of contempt against wife overturned on appeal
Tulloch	M	Cw	L	L	Matti v. Matti, 2005 CanLII 39889 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody
Tulloch	M	Cw	M	M	Sincovich v. Sincovich, 2005 CanLII 33591 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	12.0	Husband successful in custody support application, claims 45 K gets 12 K costs
Tulloch	M	Cw	F	F	Stafford v. Rebane, 2004 CanLII 34080 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wifes motion for sale of home rejected and husbands motion for exclusive interim possession allowed, man must pay wife 12 K per month spousal support, man has custody
Tulloch	M	Cw	M	sr	Walsh v. Walsh, 2006 CanLII 20857 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3 K costs of interim motion

South West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Sw – South West Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Leitch	F	Sw	5	4	2	2	0	0	0	0
Marshman	F	Sw	14	3	9	2	5	1	1	0
Morrisette	F	Sw	3	1	2	1	1	0	0	0
Nolan	F	Sw	3	3	1	1	1	1	1	1
Rady	F	Sw	5	0	2	0	3	1	0	0
Templeton	F	Sw	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Abbey	M	Sw	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Brokenshire	M	Sw	3	0	3	0	1	0	0	0
Campbell	M	Sw	19	6	11	3	7	2	2	1
Cusinato	M	Sw	8	3	3	2	1	0	0	0
Dandie	M	Sw	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Desotti	M	Sw	7	0	4	0	2	2	1	1
Ducharme	M	Sw	3	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Granger	M	Sw	5	1	4	1	0	0	0	0
Harper	M	Sw	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Heeney	M	Sw	12	1	9	1	2	1	0	0
Jenkins	M	Sw	4	1	3	1	0	0	0	0
Kennedy	M	Sw	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Patterson	M	Sw	6	2	3	1	0	0	0	0
Quinn JG	M	Sw	7	5	7	5	3	0	0	0
Rogin	M	Sw	2	0	2	0	1	0	0	0
Vogelsang	M	Sw	11	2	5	0	4	1	1	1

Female	6	31	11	17	6	10	3	2	1
Male	15	95	22	59	14	22	6	4	3
Total	22	126	33	76	20	32	9	6	4

Southwest Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 0

N = 22 Mean = 23.6 Total = 519.2

1.000 3.600 3.600 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 7.700 10.00 10.10 18.30 22.80 23.00 23.10 24.00 25.00 25.00 28.00 36.00 37.90 60.00 140.0

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 17 Mean = 33.9 Total = 576.3

7.000 8.000 10.00 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 43.00 46.00 50.00 186.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 27 Mean = 13.3 Total = 359.1

0.6000 1.500 1.500 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.300 3.000 3.000 3.300 4.500 4.500 7.000 7.500 8.000 12.00 12.10 12.40 12.60 15.00 15.00 19.30 30.60 41.00 49.00 85.00

Female Cost Penalties

N = 11 Mean = 9.2 Total = 101.2

1.500 2.000 2.700 5.000 5.500 5.800 6.500 8.000 14.00 18.00 32.50

Southwest Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

		Sw	sr	M	Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, 1 K per month spousal support, no children
		Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
		Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
		Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
		Sw	sr	M	Nastasi v. Nastasi, 2006 CanLII 33689 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mans tries to commit suicide and gets supervised access, wife gets custody, supervised access rescinded, restraining order, man must take medication to have access
		Sw	sr	M	Nastasi v. Nastasi, 2006 CanLII 33689 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans tries to commit suicide and gets supervised access, wife gets custody, supervised access rescinded, restraining order
Leitch	F	Sw	M	M	Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	4.5	4.5 K lump sum for retroactive child support, 1300 per month spousal support
Leitch	F	Sw	sr	M	Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Man claims 41 K income and is imputed to 72 K per year
Leitch	F	Sw	sr	M	Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	23.0	Lump sum of 23 K from severance package, increase in child support retroactive
Leitch	F	Sw	sr	M	Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		1 K security for costs to continue motion to vary
Leitch	F	Sw	sr	M	Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.3	3.3 K costs for variation, 3.3 K retroactive arrears, 1.4 K credit card lump, 10.5 K arrears, FRO may apply for commital of there’s a default, previous 3 K cost penalty by Harper J
Marshman	F	Sw	M	F	Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handyman, wife earns 19 K
Marshman	F	Sw	sr	F	Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	23.0	Man imputed to 85 K from previous imputation of 62 K, wife gets ¾ of assets due to lump sum and costs
Marshman	F	Sw	sr	M	Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Man imputed to 85 K from previous imputation of 62 K, wife gets ¾ of assets due to lump sum and costs
Marshman	F	Sw	F	F	Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.8	Wife gets 1.8 K in costs from interim motion
Marshman	F	Sw	F	F	Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession of family home
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Deelstra v. Van Osch, 2003 CanLII 2007 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	30.6	Divorce action, 4 day trial, wife gets custody 30.6 K
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Dietrich v. Franklin, 2003 CanLII 41467 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	41.0	Divorce action and appeal, 41 K costs
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Giguere v. Giguere, 2004 CanLII 5004 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.1	Trial of support, 12.1 K costs
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Hofsteede v. Hofsteede, 2006 CanLII 2052 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	7.0	Man claims 76 K income and is imputed to 83 K, wife claims 10 K income and is imputed to 25 K
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Hurd v. Hurd, 2006 CanLII 15312 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man gets interim supervised access after not seeing daughter for 6 weeks, wife gets 1 K cost penalty unless vacated
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	36.0	Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial, 12 K more costs of appeal in 2005, 36 K retroactive support, 10.7 K total monthly support
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	49.0	Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial, 12 K more costs of appeal in 2005, 36 K retroactive support, 10.7 K total monthly support
Marshman	F	Sw	F	F	Morrison v. Morrison, 2003 CanLII 1950 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.5	Divorce action, 7.5 K costs
Marshman	M	Sw	sr	F	Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.6	Interim motion 0.6 K costs
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 4493 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.0	2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month, 2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month 8 K costs
Morrisette	F	Sw	F	M	Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K lump sum for compensatory support, 28 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K per month in child support, must keep 250 K insurance policy as security
Morrisette	F	Sw	M	M	Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must keep 250 K insurance policy as security for support, 3.5 K per month in child support, 25 K in retroactive support, 28 K in compensatory spousal support
Morrissette	F	Sw	sr	M	D .K. v. D. K, 2003 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged and acquitted of assault, wife hires private investigators, wife gets custody, denies access, contempt, 2 children don’t want to see man, man gets custody of third child
Nolan	F	Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
Nolan	F	Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Nolan	F	Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.6	Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs
Rady	F	Sw	F	M	C.J.S. v. S.S., 2005 CanLII 15468 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Joint custody, both man and wife must maintain insurance policies naming the children as beneficiaries
Rady	F	Sw	M	M	Elrafih v. Halbouni, 2004 CanLII 15455 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of domestic assault, wife gets custody
Rady	F	Sw	F	M	Raptis v. Raptis, 2006 CanLII 25413 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	10.0	Man claims a 16 K income and is imputed to 26 K, most arrears rescinded
Rady	F	Sw	M	sr	Snih v. Snih, 2004 CanLII 16815 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harrassment order
Rady	F	Sw	M	F	Sylvester v. Sylvester, 2006 CanLII 36360 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Templeton	F	Sw	M	M	Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	46.0	Man claims 39 K income, imputed to 85 K
Abbey	M	Sw	M	M	Garlough v. Garlough, 2002 CanLII 2845 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Preservation order against family trust, wife gets house and support
Abbey	M	Sw	F	M	Larkin v. Labonté, 2002 CanLII 2664 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	60.0	60 K unjust enrichment to be paid as a lump sum from mans RRSP
Brokenshire	M	Sw	F	F	Durocher v. Lauzon, 2003 CanLII 8943 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Appeal of uncontested trial after pleadings struck dismissed, no relief except minor change on pension amounts
Brokenshire	M	Sw	M	M	Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	140 K lump sum added to equalization for mans depletion of jointly owned trucking company, average depletion 41 K per year but man imputed to 55 K, wife unemployed imputerd to 12 K, wife gets 1.4 K total support per month
Brokenshire	M	Sw	M	M	Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	140.0	140 K lump sum added to equalization for mans depletion of jointly owned trucking company, average depletion 41 K per year but man imputed to 55 K, wife unemployed imputerd to 12 K, 7.7 K retroactive arrears
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	F	Attwood v. Sharma, 2000 CanLII 22567 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans claim for custody and access dismissed with no hope of succeeding, restraining order
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	F	Attwood v. Sharma, 2000 CanLII 22567 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mans claim for custody and access dismissed with no hope of succeeding, restraining order
Campbell	M	Sw	M	F	Babinsky v. Babinsky, 2006 CanLII 32912 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Man claims 28 K income and is imputed to 41 K, man owes 30 K arrears, 21 K of it to social services
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Biggin v. Maloney, 2006 CanLII 7511 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Simple case, 1.5 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	F	F	Brennan v. Brennan, 2002 CanLII 2742 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.1	Interim motion,both parties claim to have spent over 30 K, 2.1 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	186.0	Man imputed from 64 K claimed to 250 K, separation agreement overturned and man must pay 3.4 K instead of 2.5 K per month
Campbell	M	Sw	F	F	Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2003 CanLII 1959 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Security and non dissipation orders against man continued
Campbell	M	Sw	F	F	Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2003 CanLII 1959 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, equalization payment of 257 K to wife, security and non dissipation orders
Campbell	M	Sw	F	F	Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2004 CanLII 5858 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	85.0	Divorce action, wife gets 85 K
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	F	DePace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22460 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	19.3	Mans pleadings struck 19.3 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	M	F	Depace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22560 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	43.0	Mans claims ongoing losses and is imputed to 43 K
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	M	Ficca v. Ficca, 2004 CanLII 6226 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.9	Motion to change access, 1.9 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Fisher v. Fisher, 2006 CanLII 4950 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must designate wife as beneficiary of life insurance to secure 2.6 K per month support, support drops to 1 K in a year
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Jones v. Scheltgen, 2003 CanLII 2389 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Criminal convictions and charges, drugs and jail, supervised access, access suspended and cut, many conditions
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	F	Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		2 years after divorce judgment man seeks to vary restraining order made
Campbell	M	Sw	sr	F	Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.0	Divorce action, man must pay 7 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		5.5 K fine for first contempt and 7.5 K fine for second contempt, fines made post bankruptcy debt, security denied, unstated cost penalty
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Thomson v. Thomson, 2004 CanLII 7356 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Insurance policy and charge binding on estate for security
Campbell	M	Sw	M	F	Waywell v. Waywell, 2004 CanLII 7577 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Wife asks 30 K for interim support relief and gets 2 K
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	F	Dias v. Dias, 2005 CanLII 41541 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.3	Interim motion on sale of property, 2.3 K costs
Cusinato	M	Sw	ex	F	Gibb v. Gibb, 2004 CanLII 27718 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate children as beneficiaries of life insurance policy, support increased ex parte
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	F	Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 31729 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.4	Support variation, 12.4 K costs, 41 K US arrears
Cusinato	M	Sw	sr	M	Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans pleadings struck, house vested to wife as security, 15 K costs
Cusinato	M	Sw	sr	M	Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Mans pleadings struck, house vested to wife as security, 15 K costs
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	M	Simpson v. Simpson, 2005 CanLII 44188 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	M	Simpson v. Simpson, 2005 CanLII 44188 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	8.0	Man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 60 K
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	M	Simpson v. Simpson, 2006 CanLII 819 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	All issues settled prior to trial except spousal support, 4.5 K costs
Dandie	M	Sw	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	105 K costs overturned on appeal and left for new trial judge, 15 K costs of appeal against man
Dandie	M	Sw	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession and man gets occupancy rent, overturned on appeal
Dandie	M	Sw	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed to 48 K and wifes income imputed to 18 K
Desotti	M	Sw	M	F	Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	23.1	23.1 K retroactive arrears, separation agreement overturned
Desotti	M	Sw	F	M	Davis v. Davis, 2003 CanLII 2300 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	3.6	Lump sum of 3.6 K for retroactive support, 1.5 K per month ongoing support
Desotti	M	Sw	M	F	Gibson v. Gibson, 2005 CanLII 5487 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	Unemployed man is imputed to 25 K per year, he recieves 1 L per month spousal saupport for 24 months
Desotti	M	Sw	M	M	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 5488 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	12.0	Divorce action with 3 day trial, wife gets 12 K, husband asks 45 K
Desotti	M	Sw	F	M	Kocak v. Durco, 2004 CanLII 5054 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	24.0	24 K lump sum to woman in 10 year cohabitation relationship, to be paid $ 200 per month
Desotti	M	Sw	F	M	Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	3.6	3.6 K Lump sum for retroactive support, portions of separation agreement overturned
Desotti	M	Sw	F	M	Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3 K costs interim motion
Ducharme	M	Sw	M	M	Bechard v. Illingworth, 2003 CanLII 1923 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.0	Must pay 5 K lump sum in 180 days for not disclosing rental income, man gets 1 K per month spousal support
Ducharme	M	Sw	ex	M	Elliott v. Elliott, 2004 CanLII 30969 (ON C.A.)	mn	D		Noted in default and an order made for a reference into a pension asset not ruled on at trial
Ducharme	M	Sw	M	F	Pickard v. Pickard, 2005 CanLII 23688 (ON S.C)	mj	L	5.0	5 K retroactive support lump sum
Granger	M	Sw	F	M	Benoit v. Benoit, 2000 CanLII 22570 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Granger	M	Sw	F	M	Benoit v. Benoit, 2000 CanLII 22570 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	7.7	7.7 K in retroactive arrears, 2.8 K per month in total ongoing support
Granger	M	Sw	sr	F	D.R.D. v. S.E.G., 2001 CanLII 28122 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans suit for damages for fraud over childs paternity dismissed, claim for past support dismissed bur arrears rescinded and support terminated
Granger	M	Sw	M	M	Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 383 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support
Granger	M	Sw	F	M	Visnjic v. Visnjic, 2000 CanLII 22592 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man says he earns no income and is imputed to 50 K per year
Harper	M	Sw	sr	M	Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Default on support 3.0 K costs, man does not comply with disclosure
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2001 CanLII 28188 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	37.9	37.9 K lump sum spousal award, 4 K arrears. 5.9 K retroactive arrears, 1.2 K reimbursement
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of his 200 K insurance policy, support to be enforceable against mans estate
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man imputed to 150 K, wife imputed to 15 K, Man must pay 3.1 K per month in total support, wife mild
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 21.9 K prejudgment interest
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Kapogiannes v. Kapogiannes, 2000 CanLII 22424 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Husband claims about 10 K income and is imputed to 40 K
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Kapogiannes v. Kapogiannes, 2000 CanLII 22424 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	Lump of 10 K to be paid from 50 K held by court for retroactive support
Heeney	M	Sw	sr	M	K. M. O. v. L. O., 2004 CanLII 2544 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	22.8	Man estranged from adult daughter must pay 22.8 K retroactive lump sum for her masters degree
Heeney	M	Sw	F	M	Kucera v. Kucera, 2005 CanLII 12854 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization, minor
Heeney	M	Sw	F	M	Leis v. Leis, 2002 CanLII 2796 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	1.0	1 K lump sum for retroactive arrears
Heeney	M	Sw	M	M	Pacheco v. Pacheco, 2001 CanLII 28116 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Mans pension to be divided as a lump sum limiting ongoing spousal support
Heeney	M	Sw	M	M	Poole v. Poole, 2001 CanLII 28196 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.1	10.1 K lump for support arrears and truck payment
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Wilson v. Wilson, 2002 CanLII 2824 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 17.5 K child support arrears
Jenkins	M	Sw	sr	M	Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 56 K
Jenkins	M	Sw	M	M	P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, threats, jail, denied access, supervised access ordered to be unsupervised if successful, retroactive support
Jenkins	M	Sw	M	M	P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order on his farm for child support, jailed for death threat against wife
Jenkins	M	Sw	M	M	Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs interim motion
Kennedy	M	Sw	M	F	Leckie v. Leckie, 2003 CanLII 1971 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	30 K additional income imputed for consulting
Kennedy	M	Sw	M	F	Leckie v. Leckie, 2003 CanLII 1971 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Security for ongoing support by life insurance policy, equalization prepayment of 14 K from sale of home, his sailboat and RRSP
Patterson	M	Sw	M	M	Adams v. Adams, 2000 CanLII 22550 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		11.7 K per month total support binding on estate, man must keep insurance policy as security for support.
Patterson	M	Sw	M	F	Bondy v. Bondy, 2004 CanLII 14546 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		98 K life insurance to secure spousal support, wife asks for RRSP too but is denied
Patterson	M	Sw	M	M	Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Wife is to be named beneficiary of insurance policy
Patterson	M	Sw	M	M	Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	18.3	12.9 K retroactive child support award, 5.4 K retroactive spousal support award
Patterson	M	Sw	ex	F	Sheffiel-Lambros v. Sheffiel, 2005 CanLII 4449 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		27 K proceeds of life insurance designated as security for support ordered paid to daughter from husbands estate
Patterson	M	Sw	ex	F	Sheffiel-Lambros v. Sheffiel, 2005 CanLII 4449 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Deceased husband does not appear and is given a 4.5 K cost penalty
Quinn	M	Cs	F	F	Boucher v. Boucher, 2003 CanLII 39249 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Appeal of pleadings struck dismissed, 3 K costs of appeal
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	L	Bubis v. Jones, 2000 CanLII 22571 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Both man and wife found in contempt, suspended sentences, custody reversed to wife
Quinn	M	Cs	M	F	Higgins v. Higgins, 2001 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	29.0	Lump sum of 29 K for occupation rent, man has custody pays wife net support of $ 840 per month, wife unemployed and imputed to 30 K
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	M	Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Court finds man guilty of contempt for failing to submit disclosure on it’s own motion, 5 days in jail
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	M	Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	46.8	46.8 K costs of divorce action
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	M	Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	50.0	Lump sum spousal support of 50 K
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	L	Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, undefended trial, 15 K costs
Rogin	M	Sw	M	M	Mickle v. Mickle, 2006 CanLII 9150 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	28.0	28 K lump sum retroactive support award
Rogin	M	Sw	M	M	Wigle v. Wigle, 2003 CanLII 2359 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		17 K arrears of spousal support, charging order, costs
Vogelsang	M		M	L	Anshasi v. Ramlawi, 2004 CanLII 9558 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault, no children, spousal support 1.6 K per month
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	Koch v. Koch, 2001 CanLII 28155 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K lump sum as compensatory support
Vogelsang	M	Sw	F	M	Kohl v. Finnis, 2000 CanLII 22445 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default on support, variation refused, 36 K arrears, mans drivers license suspended
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man studying for PHD can make extra income, imputed at 20 K per year
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault and acquitted, wife gets interim custody
Volgesang	M	Sw	M	M	Marchese v. Marchese, 2004 CanLII 34429 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default on costs and support, threat of pleadings struck and contempt, support order imputed
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	McLean v. McLean, 2004 CanLII 34800 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must keep insurance policies as security
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	ex	Ogonowski v. Ogonowska, 2001 CanLII 28175 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	4.5	4.5 K lump sum to social services because wife didn’t tell them of husbands employment, 1.3 K arrears
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man declares bankruptcy, multiple contempts, non dissipation order, 12.5 K in costs post bankruptcy, support recovery and reset on actual post bankruptcy income
Vogelsang	M	Sw	sr	M	Weiler v. Phifer, 2007 CanLII 9240 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Wife takes children from Texas to Ontario, husband gets supervied access later changed to unsupervised, husband must deposit his passport to get access, heard in 2005
Vogelsang	M	Sw	sr	M	Weiler v. Phifer, 2007 CanLII 9240 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife takes children from Texas to Ontario, husband gets supervied access later changed to unsupervised, husband must deposit his passport to get access, heard in 2005

2) Penalties Against Females

		Sw	sr	L	P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non depletion order
Marshman	F	Sw	F	M	Bowcock v. Bowcock, 2005 CanLII 18193 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	Husband must call motion to terminate support because of wifes actions, asks for 6.8 K gets 5.5 K
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 13238 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.0	Divorce, husband gets 8 K costs for interim motion to be offset against his support payments
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wife must pay 6.5 K costs for interim motion
Marshman	F	Sw	M	M	Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	32.5	Divorce action, 15 day trial, wife must pay 32.5 K and her lawyer 5 K in costs
Marshman	F	Sw	F	F	Miller v. Miller, 2005 CanLII 463 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Wife motion for supervised access fails 1.5 K costs
Morrisette	F	Sw	M	F	J.E.H. v. W.V.D., 2004 CanLII 16460 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parents have been convicted of assault, Wife is imprisoned and man gets custody, custody reversed to mother
Nolan	F	Sw	M	sr	Domise v. Oyadiran, 2006 CanLII 2614 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Wifes motion challenging the validity of a US divorce is summarily dismissed
Rady	F	Sw	F	M	C.J.S. v. S.S., 2005 CanLII 15468 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Joint custody, both man and wife must maintain insurance policies naming the children as beneficiaries
Rady	F	Sw	M	sr	Snih v. Snih, 2004 CanLII 16815 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order
Rady	F	Sw	M	F	Sylvester v. Sylvester, 2006 CanLII 36360 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Brokenshire	M	Sw	M	M	Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	12.0	Wife unemployed is imputed 12 K income, recieves 1.4 K per month total support and 7.7 K retroactive arrears
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Cumpson v. Templeton, 2005 CanLII 50010 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	14.0	Husband wins custody and mobility trial, 14 K costs
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Jahangiri-Mavaneh v. Taheri-Zengekani, 2005 CanLII 17771 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Summary judgment dismissal of wifes support action overturned on appeal
Campbell	M	Sw	M	sr	L.C.M. v. C.A.V., 2003 CanLII 47888 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Wife denied a trial, husband gets custody
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	MacRae v. Simpson, 2002 CanLII 2723 (ON S.C.)	mn	Js		Womans motion to reopen separation agreement is dismissed by summary judgment
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	MacRae v. Simpson, 2003 CanLII 2307 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.8	Half day motion, husband asks 27.8 K and gets 5.8 K
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Snih v. Snih, 2007 CanLII 20774 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.0	Wife loses custody action, husband claims 30 K and gets 18 K
Campbell	M	Sw	M	M	Walker v. Walker, 2006 CanLII 20095 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Husband gets 5 K
Cusinato	M	Sw	M	M	Moore v. Riley, 2005 CanLII 24928 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs of interim motion
Dandie	M	Sw	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Mans income imputed to 48 K and wifes income imputed to 18 K
Desotti	M	Sw	M	sr	D .K. v. D. K, 2003 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		2 contempt motions for denied access, minor or no penalty, father gets make up access, on the third contempt motion Morissette J denies contempt but gives father custody
Desotti	M	Sw	M	sr	Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Wife abducts children, contempt sentence unstated, criminal charges
Heeney	M	Sw	M	F	Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	15.0	Man imputed to 150 K, wife imputed to 15 K, Man must pay 3.1 K per month in total support, wife mild
Heeney	M	Sw	M	sr	Yeo v. Yeo, 2003 CanLII 2276 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	7.0	Wife is on unemployment asnd is imputed to former 17 K income, recieves $ 600 per month spousal support, husband has custody
Rogin	M	Sw	M	F	Ridland v. Ridland, 2002 CanLII 49519 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Spousal support payments made binding on estate of wife
Quinn	M	Cs	L	L	Brisebois v. Brisebois, 2006 CanLII 7024 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	6.0	Wife imputed from 24 K to 30 K and later varied
Quinn	M	Cs	sr	L	Bubis v. Jones, 2000 CanLII 22571 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Both man and wife found in contempt, suspended sentences, custody reversed to wife
Quinn	M	Cs	M	F	Higgins v. Higgins, 2001 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	30.0	Lump sum of 29 K for occupation rent to wife, man has custody pays wife net support of $ 840 per month, wife unemployed and imputed to 30 K
Volgelsang	M	Sw	sr	L	J.E.H. v. W.V.D., 2004 CanLII 16460 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Charged with assault, jail, gets supervised access self represented, both have been charged and convicted before, then unsupervised, then sole custody with lawyer
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	F	Marshall v. Marshall, 2004 CanLII 4015 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.7	Custody and access motion, 2.7 K costs
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	M	McLean v. McLean, 2004 CanLII 34800 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must keep insurance policies as security
Vogelsang	M	Sw	M	sr	Stoangi v. Petersen, 2006 CanLII 24124 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Wife imputed from 49 K to 62 K because she quit her job

North West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Nw – North West Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Pierce	F	Nw	23	13	14	10	8	1	3	1
Kozak	M	Nw	4	0	2	0	1	0	1	0
Kurisko	M	Nw	3	1	1	1	1	0	0	0
McCartney	M	Nw	14	10	10	8	8	4	4	2
Platana	M	Nw	7	6	1	1	3	3	3	3
Shaw	M	Nw	14	6	7	3	1	0	0	0
Smith GP	M	Nw	13	3	8	1	3	1	0	0
Stach	M	Nw	7	0	2	0	3	0	1	0
Wright	M	Nw	12	3	7	1	3	0	0	0
Zelinski	M	Nw	3	2	2	2	2	0	0	0

Female Judges	1	23	13	14	10	8	1	3	1
Male judges	9	77	32	39	17	25	8	9	5
Total	10	100	45	53	27	33	9	12	6

Northwest Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 0

N = 8 Mean = 47.6 Total = 380

0.8000 2.500 5.500 6.000 36.00 50.00 80.00 200.0

Male Imputed Income missing 1

N = 9 Mean = 20.9 Total = 188.5

1.500 2.800 11.00 12.00 21.00 26.00 30.20 40.00 44.00

Male Cost Penalties

N = 26 Mean = 12.1 Total = 313.4

0.9000 1.200 1.500 2.000 2.300 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.500 5.000 5.500 5.800 6.000 6.000 6.600 8.500 8.800 9.000 9.000 12.00 20.00 31.00 31.40 36.40 39.50 51.00

Female Cost Penalties

N = 14 Mean = 13.6 Total = 190.4

0.2000 0.3000 0.5000 1.500 1.500 1.500 3.000 4.000 4.200 4.200 27.50 28.00 47.00 67.00

Northwest Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Pierce	F	Nw	sr	sr	Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Vesting order of mans half of the family home as security for equalization, man claims he is facing bankruptcy, life insurance policy to be designated as security for support
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	M	Curle v. Lowe, 2004 CanLII 22947 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans claim for damages against common law wife for denial of access dismissed
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2147 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	39.5	Divorce action, wife claims 61 K gets 39.5
Pierce	F	Nw	M	L	Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2148 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Husband defaults on 5.5 K of financial provisions of interim order and 5.8 K support arrears, vesting order that half his CN pension is transferred to wife
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession of home and custody and 2 K total support per month and 1.2 K per month expenses
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	F	M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	31.4	Divorce action, 31.4 K costs
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	F	M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest, 3 years on 55 K equalization
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	F	M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Permanent restraining order for harassing wife, 5 K bond on restraining order
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	F	M.C.J. v. J.J.J., 2006 CanLII 23936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Husband must designate wife beneficiary of life insurance, husband does not appear at trial, 5 K security on restraining order
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	L	Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 49531 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		6 K lump s.7 expenses, 5 K for money taken from trust and retroactive support plus interest, default causing uncontested trial, default later set aside on consent
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	L	Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 49531 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	6.0	6 K lump s.7 expenses, 5 K for money taken from trust and retroactive support plus interest, default causing uncontested trial, default later set aside on consent
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Straight v. Straight, 2004 CanLII 7046 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	12.0	Man declares 58 K imputed to 70 K per year, court declines to impute wife, man pays 1 K spousal support
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2004 CanLII 48680 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets preservation order for bank accounts and combines fraudulent conveyance action with divorce
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2004 CanLII 48680 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Security of 25 K to be posted by husband for violating court orders
Kozack	M	Nw	M	F	Eloranta v. Eloranta, 2002 CanLII 2710 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Equalization payment secured by second mortgage, must get life insurance policy sufficient to cover support obligations
Kozak	M	Nw	F	M	Kelly v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 2344 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	36.0	36 K lump sum and additional 19 K equalization in ammended agreement after 206 K equalization, third variation not allowed
Kurisko	M	Nw	sr	M	B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of sexual assault on daughter, access terminated
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	M	Almgren v. Almgren, 2006 CanLII 7502 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Divorce action, all that was left for trial was support, wife asks 18.6 and gets 12 K
McCartney	M	Nw	M	F	Bauer v. Bauer, 2004 CanLII 18436 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, man must pay $ 1206 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 7504 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	26.0	26 K per year imputed to husband from his share of house, 40 K claimed imputed to 66 K
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 7504 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, undefended trial, 31 K costs
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Bolt v. Bolt, 2006 CanLII 8876 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	31.0	Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, wife asks 45.5 K and gets 31 K
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Dustin v. Dustin, 2003 CanLII 2106 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default causing ex patre trial, though present he could not participate
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Dustin v. Dustin, 2003 CanLII 2106 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, $ 394 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support, house was husbands family home and his mother holds the mortgage
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	sr	Smith-Remus v. Remus, 2005 CanLII 51261 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.2	Man claims 5.8 K income and is imputed to 36 K, wifes support obligation is cancelled
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, 2003 CanLII 2252 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man is accused of gambling problem, non dissipation order, restraining order
McCartney	M	Nw	F	M	Willan v. Burdette, 2005 CanLII 51262 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Transitional supervised access, unsupervised ordered after period of supervision
Platana	M	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2003 CanLII 1985 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		45 days in jail unless he purges contempt and pays order and makes financial disclosure
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	M	A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 23928 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, non depletion, 1.7 K per month child support
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	M	A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 23928 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets exclusive possession, non depletion, 1.7 K per month child support
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	21.0	Unemployed man imputed to 21 K per year income, no access to kids ordered
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	F	Gray v. Gray, 2006 CanLII 28736 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Man does not appear and summary judgement is given to wife, uncontested trial
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim possession of family home, 2 oldest children live with father, non depletion order, $ 850 spousal support, $ 435 child support, retroactive arrears
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets interim possession of family home, 2 oldest children live with father, non depletion order, $ 850 spousal support, $ 435 child support, retroactive arrears
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets order for interim exclusive possession and man must pay mortgage arrears
Smith GP	M	Nw	M	M	Dafoe v. Dafoe, 2005 CanLII 19821 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, man had custody but joint custody and residence with mother in another city ordered
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	DeCicco v. DeCicco, 2003 CanLII 2094 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Divorce action 20 K costs
Smith GP	M	Nw	sr	L	Prosser-Blake v. Blake, 2007 CanLII 10414 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Sept 2005 non harassment order, supervised access, answer struck, uncontested trial, man imprisoned for assault.
Smith GP	M	Nw	M	F	Skramrud v. Skramrud, 2007 CanLII 51173 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	2.5 K spousal per month, $ 400 child support, lump sum of 90 K, man is imputed to former 81 K pay from actual 28 K for taking voluntary retirement, 9 K costs
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man on welfare and living at YMCA is imputed to 80 K lump sum and contempted when he doesn’t pay, intentionally unemployed, imputed to 40 K per year
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	80.0	Lump sum of 80 K for support, imputed income, intentionally unemployed
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Husband removed by police and restricted, mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 80 K lump sum payment, vesting of house, wife gets custody
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		House and bank account vested to secure 80 K lump sum support and 40 K equalization, man on welfare denied support, income imputed
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Tishbi v. Shemesh, 2005 CanLII 3383 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	51.0	51 K and GST for divorce action
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Tishbi v. Shemesh, 2005 CanLII 3383 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	200.0	200 K lump sum covering all claims
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	Arella v. Scobak, 2003 CanLII 2460 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	50.0	50 K lump sum for unjust enrichment, arrears not varied, wife seeks imprisonment, not found in contempt
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order against man, 2 breaches, contempt and 5 days imprisonment for the first
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with sexual assault, acquitted but wife wins civil damages 10 K, wife gets custody, Man in arrears gets variation
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	Matta v. Smith, 2002 CanLII 49536 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 400 K for unjust enrichment claim
Wright	M	Nw	M	F	Stajkowski v. Stajkowski, 2004 CanLII 26185 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order against man
Wright	M	Nw	M	F	Stajkowski v. Stajkowski, 2004 CanLII 26185 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order restraining man from interfering with mother and children
Wright	M	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2005 CanLII 41388 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 31.5 K prejudgment interest
Zelinski	M	Nw	sr	F	Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19842 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, wife claims abuse, wife gets custody, limited supervised access, Childrens Aid requests anger management course, 143 K from equalization held in trust for wife, 4.5 K costs
Zelinski	M	Nw	sr	F	Maratib v. Zafar, 2005 CanLII 19844 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, no access to children for 1 ½ years prior to trial, transitional supervised access ordered
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	sr	Bauer v. Bauer, 2005 CanLII 19811 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	5.5	5.5 K lump extraordinary child expenses, vesting order on home to wife
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Kimpton v. Kimpton, 2003 CanLII 2148 (ON S.C.	mn	Sc		Secure support with life insurance policy, vesting order that half his CN pension is transferred to wife
Pierce	F	Nw	sr	M	Korczynski v. Korczynski, 2007 CanLII 16631 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.0	Divorce action, wife claims 32.3 K and gets 9 K, man gets supervised access
Pierce	F	Nw	ex	M	Kreft v. Mezo, 2006 CanLII 14412 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wife gets ex parte freezing order, order is set aside
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual freezing order
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lord v. Haner-Lord, 2003 CanLII 2174 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion for access, husband more successful but wife in weaker financial situation wife asks for 4.6 K and gets 3 K, husband asks for 5.6 K
Pierce	F	Nw	F	F	Palinka v Palinka, 2003 CanLII 2195 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		500 K life insurance policy as security, denied 15 K interim disbursement and refraining order, 2.5 K spousal support
Pierce	F	Nw	M	M	Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	11.0	Man imputed from 115 K to 126 K
Kozack	M	Nw	M	F	Eloranta v. Eloranta, 2002 CanLII 2710 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Unsupervised access for 7 years then supervised access for guns and alcohol, breach of order, wife requests supervised but unsupervised restored, contempt sentence suspended but must sign undertaking not to breach
Kozak	M	Nw	F	M	Regaudie v. Thomas, 2002 CanLII 2667 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.2	1.2 K for default set aside on consent
Kurisko	M	Nw	sr	M	B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs of motion
Kurisko	M	Nw	M	M	Neil v. Neil, 2002 CanLII 2644 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets interim order for exclusive possession but vacates it and it is sold
Kurisko	M	Nw	F	M	Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Costs of motion 6 K to be offset against 11 K cost penalties against wife and 5.7 K interest, wife gets interim retroactive spousal support of 0.8 K per month
McCartney	M	Nw	F	M	LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 2006 CanLII 24337 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security
McCartney	M	Nw	L	L	Niemi v. Niemi, 2006 CanLII 24341 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	M	Patkau v. Patkau, 2005 CanLII 49673 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must make children beneficiaries of insurance until support obligation ends, minor
McCartney	M	Nw	sr	F	Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, 2003 CanLII 2252 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Granted due to controlling intrusive conduct of man, non dissipation order due to gambling
Platana	M	Nw	sr	sr	Bauer v. Bauer, 2006 CanLII 28731 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.5	Divorce action, wife gets 8.5 K
Platana	M	Nw	sr	F	Bauer v. Bauer, 2007 CanLII 16624 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Husband makes failed motion for contempt, 3.5 K costs
Platana	M	Nw	sr	sr	L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife makes sexual assault allegations, man gets custody, wife is not present at trial and her case is dismissed, wife must have supervised access
Platana	M	Nw	sr	M	Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 16639 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.8	Trial of support, wife asks 9.8 K costs and gets 8.8 K
Platana	M	Nw	M	M	Topetto v. Topetto, 2003 CanLII 1984 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Divorce action primarily negotiated between parties, wife asks 9.4 K gets 5 K
Platana	M	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2003 CanLII 1985 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	4.5 K costs of contempt motion
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	M	A.J.B. v. L.M.R.B., 2006 CanLII 26161 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Wife gets 3 K on interim motion, asks for 6 K
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	F	Gray v. Gray, 2006 CanLII 28736 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K costs for uncontested divorce action
Shaw	M	Nw	sr	L	Lehtomaa v. Lehtomaa, 2006 CanLII 34439 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of workplace survivor benefits
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	2.5	Man pays lump sum of 2.5 K for interim support
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.3	Interim motion on sale of home,wife asks 4.5 K and gets 2.3 K, husband asks 5.7 K
Shaw	M	Nw	M	M	Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 28744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Home ordered sold and money from sale ordered held as security, contempt motion dismissed
Shaw	M	Nw	F	M	Smylie v. Smylie, 2006 CanLII 39471 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate children as beneficiaries of 125 K life insurance policy
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	M	Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, man gets interim custody and wife supervised access
Smith GP	M	Nw	M	F	Norland v. Norland, 2007 CanLII 20786 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.6	Wife gets 6.6 K costs for interim motion
Smith GP	M	Nw	F	sr	St. James v. St. James, 2006 CanLII 31618 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must maintain an 150 K insurance policy
Smith GP	M	Nw	sr	M	Thompson v. Thompson, 2003 CanLII 2258 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	2.8	Mans income is imputed from 19.7 K to 22.5 K, spousal support increased from ).1 K per month to 0.3 K, child support wife must pay is reduced
Smith GP	M	Nw	sr	M	Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.8	5.8 K costs for motion to vary support
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Bacskai v. Bacskai, 2006 CanLII 44260 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion for summary judgment dismissed 1.5 K costs
Stach	M	Nw	M	F	Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	6 K total costs of multiple issues and motions
Stach	M	Nw	F	M	Jaszczyszak v. Jaszczyszak, 2003 CanLII 2318 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession for 8 years and husband gets 15 K occupation rent
Stach	M	Nw	M	F	Kemble v. Roy, 2006 CanLII 23937 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate with as beneficiary of insurance policy, interim spousal support of 1.2 K per month
Stach	M	Nw	F	M	Krebs v. Yarmel, 2003 CanLII 2325 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Father must name children as beneficiaries of life insurance policy, minor
Wright	M	Nw	sr	M	Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	0.8	$ 800 lump sum for occupational rent not excluded from his bankruptcy
Wright	M	Nw	M	F	G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	36.4	Divorce action 36.4 Kcosts
Wright	M	Nw	M	sr	Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	1.5	Man imputed from 9 K to 10.5 K. Wife pays him net child support, mild
Wright	M	Nw	M	sr	Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must keep 250 K insurance policies, also safety deposit box kept containing bonds
Wright	M	Nw	sr	M	Valente v. Valente, 2005 CanLII 41388 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.9	Wife gets 0.9 K costs
Zelinski	M	Nw	F	M	Smylie v. Smylie, 2006 CanLII 39471 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	44.0	Man intentionally unemployed for quitting job and is imputed to 44 K, order later retroactively rescinded by Shaw J

2) Penalties Against Women

Pierce	F	Nw	M	M	Anderson v. Sitch, 2004 CanLII 36067 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Woman in default of support is granted a restraining order to retain drivers license but denied injuction to prevent notification of credit bureaus
Pierce	F	Nw	M	M	Gillett v. Smyth, 2002 CanLII 2786 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	73.0	Womans projected income of 81 K imputed to average 154 K, 4.8 K per month total support, husband has custody of the 4 children
Pierce	F	Nw	M	M	Gillett v. Smyth, 2002 CanLII 2786 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.0	Wife to pay 5 K lump for arrears, 4.8 K per month in total support
Pierce	F	Nw	F	M	Jellison v. Jellison, 2003 CanLII 2319 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man gets exclusive possession of home if he pays the costs, then home is ordered sold
Pierce	F	Nw	M	M	Kuluski v. Adams, 2002 CanLII 2684 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.2	Husband wins interim motion to stop wife moving with children, 4.2 K
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual freezing order
Pierce	F	Nw	M	F	Lampshire v. Lampshire, 2002 CanLII 2737 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual non harassment order
Pierce	F	Nw	M	ex	Leonard v. Carlson, 2006 CanLII 3480 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Husband gets ex parte order to stop wife from taking child to US where she lives
Kozack	M	Nw	F	M	Kelly v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 2344 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Womans motion to overturn separation agreement for support and equalization is dismissed, wife already got equalization and 36 K support lump sum, overturned on appeal and she gets 16.5 K costs
Kurisko	M	Nw	F	M	Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K for interim support motion withdrawn
McCartney	M	Nw	L	L	B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining or that wife can not go back to family home, wife violates order
McCartney	M	Nw	F	M	Goeldner v. Goeldner, 2004 CanLII 14348 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	47.0	Divorce action no children, costs 47 K plus 2.6 K prejudgment interest, changed to 20 K costs on appeal
McCartney	M	Nw	F	M	Goeldner v. Goeldner, 2004 CanLII 14348 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Divorce action no children, costs 47 K plus 2.6 K prejudgment interest
McCartney	M	Nw	F	M	Hensel v. Hensel, 2006 CanLII 40672 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion for daycare, 1.5 K costs
McCartney	M	Nw	F	sr	Jones v. Cole, 2007 CanLII 21956 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	28.0	Wifes motion to vary support fails, husband asks for 76 K and gets 28 K
McCartney	M	Nw	M	ex	McEvoy v. McEvoy, 2003 CanLII 2178 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Woman doesn’t attend trial and her pleadings are struck
McCartney	M	Nw	M	ex	McEvoy v. McEvoy, 2003 CanLII 2178 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3 K costs for striking motion
McCartney	M	Nw	F	sr	St. James v. St. James, 2006 CanLII 31618 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.5	Interim motion for freezing order dismissed, 0.5 K costs
Platana	M	Nw	M	sr	Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	67.0	Divorce action, wife makes fraud claim, husband asks 102 K gets 67 K
Platana	M	Nw	sr	sr	L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 21777 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	27.5	Husband claims 50 K for divorce and gets 27.5 K, wife claims 91 K
Platana	M	Nw	sr	sr	L.J.J.C. v. V.S.C., 2006 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Doesn’t appear at trial, was already on supervised access, supervised access continued.
Shaw	M	Nw	M	F	Petit v. Petit, 2007 CanLII 20789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4.0 K for withdrawn motion
Smith GP	M	Nw	M	M	Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Smith GP	M	Nw	M	M	Moore v. Lannon, 2006 CanLII 14413 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Man gets interim interim custody with adult supervision for wife who he alleges does drugs
Smith GP	M	Mw	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order at trial, wife gets custody, 80 K lump sum payment, vesting of house
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Gale v. Gale, 2006 CanLII 21781 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	Js		Wifes motion for sale of cottage dismissed by summary judgement, upheld on appeal
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Gale v. Gale, 2006 CanLII 40788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.2	Interim motions in 3 courts, 4.2 K total
Stach	M	Nw	M	M	Krolyk v. Krolyk, 2005 CanLII 15478 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	10.5	Imputed income of 10.5 K to wife lowers her spousal support to 1.85 K per month, Wife gets house transferred to her and will get part of mans pension on realization, minor
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	Braga v. Braga, 2006 CanLII 28732 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Man gets 2.6 K prejudgment interest
Wright	M	Nw	M	sr	Remus v. Remus, 2003 CanLII 2222 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must keep 250 K insurance policies, also safety deposit box kept containing bonds
Wright	M	Nw	M	M	Willson v. Willson, 2003 CanLII 2274 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs for motion withdrawn if wife turns out entitled to interim support and 3.5 K costs if she wasn’t
Zelinski	M	Nw	F	M	Radcliff v. Radcliff, 2001 CanLII 28204 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.3	0.3 K costs for interim motion
Zelinski	M	Nw	L	L	White v. Richardson, 2005 CanLII 34818 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.2	Wife is under a 0.2 K cost order

North East Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Nw – North East Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Gauthier	F	Ne	13	4	6	1	5	0	2	0
Hennessy	F	Ne	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Pardu	F	Ne	7	4	6	4	0	0	0	0
Boissonneault	M	Ne	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Del Frate	M	Ne	1	1	0	0	2	1	1	1
Karam	M	Ne	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Loukidelis	M	Ne	6	2	5	2	2	0	0	0
O’Neill	M	Ne	15	2	11	1	1	0	0	0
Riopelle	M	Ne	7	6	4	3	1	0	0	0
Rivard	M	Ne	6	4	3	3	1	0	1	0
Whalen	M	Ne	7	3	5	1	3	0	2	0

Female Judges	3	22	8	13	5	5	0	2	0
Male judges	8	44	19	30	11	11	1	4	1
Total	11	66	27	43	16	16	1	6	1

Northeast Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 0

N = 7 Mean = 354.2 Total = 2479.4

1.400 7.000 7.300 9.000 25.00 30.00 2400

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 13 Mean = 31.4 Total = 174.2

6.200 8.000 10.00 12.00 15.00 16.00 17.40 29.00 35.00 35.00 50.00 60.00 115.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 15 Mean = 31.7 Total = 475.5

0.8000 1.000 1.300 1.500 1.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 8.000 9.300 10.00 15.00 18.00 28.00 370.0

Female Cost Penalties

N = 5 Mean = 50.3 Total = 251.5

2.500 3.000 7.500 27.50 211.0

Northeast Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	8.0	8 K costs for July 2001 motion to vary support of 2.6 K per month and wifes denied motion to strike pleadings
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	10.0	Mans income is imputed an extra 10 K, wifes income imputed 40 K, offset child support , man must pay 1.5 K spousal support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man violates freezing order, house and half pension vested to wife
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 14 K prejudgment interest
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must designate wife as beneficiary of life insurance and provide health insurance, 2.2 K per month total support
Gauthier	F	Ne	L	L	Blake v. Blake, 2000 CanLII 22528 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Minutes of settlement set aside because man defaults on providing financial information, provincial court order overturned and 13 K retroactive arrears
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house and custody
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	M	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	8.0	Man claims 12 K income imputed to 20 K
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Judge imposes supervised access when man says he’s too upset for trial, removed after trial despite wifes request
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wifes motion for exclusive possession of the family home allowed, non depletion order, spousal and child support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Loiselle v. Loiselle, 2000 CanLII 22461 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate his 135 K insurance policy to wife, 1.5 K per month support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	McLean v. McLean, 2003 CanLII 2044 (ON SC)	mj	L	25.0	20 K US lump sum from separation agreement paid, separation agreement then ruled invalid
Hennessy	F	Ne	M	F	Pestell v. Krystia, 2003 CanLII 2045 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	12.0	Man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 90 K, retroactive arrears, leave to appeal denied
Hennessy	F	Ne	M	F	Young v. Young, 2003 CanLII 47887 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man gets 3 years for assault, his access and grandparents access denied
Pardu	F	Ne	L	L	Booth v. Booth, 2002 CanLII 49529 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	1.4	1.4 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, child formerly declared adult has support reinstated
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	M	Goudie v. Stapleford, 2004 CanLII 20297 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Spousal support obligation secured against property, separation agreement not to pay support overturned
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	M	Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year, wife earns 44.3 K
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	sr	Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	17.4	Man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K, intentionally unemployed, arrears not rescinded
Pardu	F	Ne	sr	sr	Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Property charged for default on child support, no recission of arrears, bad faith , imputed income, intentionally unermployed
Pardu	F	Ne	F	M	Walker v. Rutledge, 2003 CanLII 2358 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.0	Divorce action, 18 K costs
Pardu	F	Ne	M	M	Wamsley v. Moore, 2003 CanLII 2269 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Pleadings to be struck unless he pays 25.6 K to FRO immediately, contempt motion abandoned
Boissonneault	M	Ne	ex	F	Masotti v. Masotti, 2002 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Unopposed support motion because husband is in default
Del Frate	M	Ne	ex	F	O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8369 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Mans income imputed to 68 K, retroactive arrears
Karam	M	Ne	l	F	Scalabrini v. Scalabrini, 2003 CanLII 18778 (ON S.C.	mj	L	7.0	7 K lump sum to settle spousal support, does not invalidate further claims
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Mans stock account and motorcycle transferred to wife to be sold for arrears, 4.2 K per month total support, imputed income
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	115.0	Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, arrears, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	10 K costs and GST
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest on 15 K equalization payment
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	F	Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Unemployed man imputed to 35 K per year income, 2.8 K per month total support
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Dwyer v. Dwyer, 2005 CanLII 5852 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.3	9.3 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Agresti v. Hatcher, 2004 CanLII 8311 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	28.0	28 K to pay ex wifes pretrial costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of home Sept 2001
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	F	Borden v. Racicot, 2003 CanLII 2065 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.3	Interim motion, 1.3 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jail threatened, security deposit, unemployed imputed income, denied access to children, costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K per year
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Man on disability for 2.5 K per year imputed to 18.5 K, 32 K support arrears reduced to 21
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Guido v. Guido, 2004 CanLII 15033 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession, husband must pay $ 850 child support and $ 866 spousal support
O’Neill	M	Ne	L	L	Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2129 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	6.2	Man claims 21.7 K income and is imputed to 27.9 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	F	Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2130 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Trial of support, wife claims 43 K gets 3.5 K, husband also claims over 40 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill	M	Ne	sr	M	Rose v. Rose, 2004 CanLII 17755 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Application to vary custody and support dismissed, 3.5 K costs
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K , joint custody, $ 361 per month offset child support
O’Neill	M	Ne	F	M	Sovereign v. Sovereign, 2004 CanLII 5087 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife alleges assault and moves to shelter violating court order, wife gets custody
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Apr 2000 motion setting support at 2.6 K per month, 1.5 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	m	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Previous non harassment order changed to 1500 feet from residence
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Leave from work constitutes underemployment, 15 K added to years income, 7 K lump spousal support
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	M	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	7.3	7.3 K lump sum for arrears of spousal support, transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, a lien on his motorcycle, 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	sr	F	Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle	M	Ne	M	F	Chertow v. Chertow, 2001 CanLII 4238 (ON C.A.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment of settlement agreement, upheld on appeal
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Low court award of 10 K costs overturned and 1.5 K costs instead
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	0.8 K costs of interim motion, ex parte default with 12.5 K cost penalty and 4 K security for costs eventually set aside
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	370.0	80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Mans pleadings struck, mans transfer of assets ruled a fraudulent conveyance and transferred to wife, 80 K repayment of funds taken, 40 K damages for fraud and 25 K punitive damages
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	F	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	2400.0	Lump sum 2.4 million, man declares bankruptcy, 95 K support arrears and 65 K damage deposit survives bankruptcy, previous 10 K lump sum
Rivard	M	Ne	sr	M	Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	M	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	M	Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Lien on property to secure support and eqalization, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	L	L	Dorthee v. Bekintis, 2004 CanLII 44989 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	9.0	9 K lump sum for settlement of spousal support obligations, and 1 year $ 750 per month
Whalen	M	Ne	M	F	Principe v. Principe, 2000 CanLII 22439 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wifes 5 year exclusive possession of the home continued, sheriffs sale stayed
Whalen	M	Ne	sr	L	Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	29.0	Mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for 2 years on welfare

2) Penalties Against Women

Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		5 K to be paid to husband for chilrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security, second time woman has been found in contempt
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Wife is unemployed and imputed to 40 K per year, offset child support, man must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		5 K to be paid to husband for childrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security
Gauthier	F	Ne	sr	F	Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier	F	Ne	M	M	Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Del Frate	M	Ne	M	M	Ansara v. Ansara, 2007 CanLII 6235 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion on acces and support, 3 K costs deferred to trial
Del Frate	M	Ne	F	sr	Levesque v. Little, 2007 CanLII 1910 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	27.5	Divorce action, husband asks 53.2 K and gets 27.5 K
Karam	M	Ne	M	M	Gabel v. Gabel, 2003 CanLII 48307 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Wife in default’s pleadings closed, order set aside on appeal, wife gets 12 K costs
Loukidalis	M	Ne	sr	F	Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	15.0	Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis	M	Ne	M	M	Borsos v. Borsos, 2006 CanLII 31201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.5	Divorce action, husband asks 47.1 K and gets 7.5 K
O’Neill	M	Ne	M	M	Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	36.0	Woman imputed at full income of 36 K after quitting her job for 6 months, then at half income for 6 months, then back to full as incentive, reduces support she’s owed to $360 per month, minor
Riopelle	M	Ne	M	F	Chertow v. Chertow, 2005 CanLII 35478 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs of motion to vary support, recalculation leaves father 38 K arrears
Rivard	M	Ne	M	M	Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Wife claims 15 K income and is imputed to 35 K
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	211.0	Divorce action, 5 ½ years to get to trial, 211 K costs
Whalen	M	Ne	M	M	Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		48 K in prejudgment interest on condo rents, spousal support claim denied

Conclusions

Regional Discrimination Ratios

DR = Discrimination Ratio = Male Penalties / Female Penalties

n = Number of Judges

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	30	240 / 30	103 / 6	146 / 5	68 / 1
Toronto	40	276 / 37	72 / 10	209 / 11	56 / 6
Central East	26	226 / 37	71 / 6	167 / 19	54 / 3
Central South	30	211 / 47	50 / 10	133 / 16	33 / 5
Central West	19	182 / 52	59 / 7	121 / 12	47 / 2
South West	21	126 / 32	33 / 9	76 / 6	20 / 4
North West	10	100 / 33	45 / 9	53 / 12	27 / 6
North East	11	66 / 16	27 / 1	43 / 6	16 / 1
Provincial Average	187	1427 / 282	452 / 54	954 / 88	322 / 28

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	30	8.0	17.2	29.2	68.0
Toronto	40	7.5	7.2	19.0	9.3
Central East	26	6.1	11.8	8.8	18.0
Central South	30	4.5	5.0	8.3	6.6
Central West	19	3.5	8.4	10.1	23.5
South West	21	3.9	3.7	12.7	4.0
North West	10	3.3	5.0	4.4	4.5
North East	11	4.1	27.0	7.2	16.0
Provincial Average	187	5.1	8.4	10.8	11.5

Judicial Discrimination Ratios

DR = Discrimination Ratio = Male Penalties / Female Penalties

n = Number of Judges

Female Judges

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	10	154 / 18	62 / 2	102 / 4	44 / 0
Toronto	24	203 / 30	50 / 7	155 / 9	39 / 4
Central East	9	104 / 14	42 / 4	85 / 6	35 / 1
Central South	5	19 / 3	7 / 1	13 / 1	4 / 1
Central West	6	65 / 22	23 / 4	46 / 8	17 / 1
South West	6	31 / 10	11 / 3	17 / 2	6 / 1
North West	1	23 / 8	13 / 1	14 / 3	10 / 1
North East	3	22 / 5	8 / 0	13 / 2	5 / 0
Provincial Average	64	621 / 109	216 / 20	445 / 35	159 / 9

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	10	8.6	32.0	25.4	NA ( 44 / 0 )
Toronto	24	5.8	7.1	17.2	9.8
Central East	9	7.4	10.5	14.2	35.0
Central South	5	6.3	7.0	13.0	4.0
Central West	6	3.0	5.8	5.8	17.0
South West	6	3.1	3.7	8.5	6.0
North West	1	2.9	13.0	4.7	10.0
North East	3	4.4	NA ( 8 / 0 )	6.5	NA ( 5 / 0 )
Provincial Average	64	5.7	10.8	12.7	17.7

Male Judges

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	20	86 / 12	40 / 4	46 / 1	24 / 1
Toronto	16	73 / 7	22 / 3	54 / 2	17 / 2
Central East x	17	122 / 23	29 / 2	82 / 13	20 / 2
Central South	25	192 / 44	43 / 9	122 / 15	29 / 4
Central West x	13	117 / 30	36 / 3	75 / 4	30 / 1
South West	15	95 / 22	22 / 6	59 / 4	14 / 3
North West	9	77 / 25	32 / 8	39 / 9	17 / 5
North East	8	44 / 11	19 / 1	30 / 4	11 / 1
Provincial Average	123	806 / 173	246 / 34	509 / 53	163 / 19

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Eastern	20	7.2	10.0	46.0	24.0
Toronto	16	10.4	7.3	22.0	8.5
Central East	17	5.3	14.5	6.3	10.0
Central South	25	4.4	4.8	8.1	7.3
Central West	13	3.9	12.0	18.8	30.0
South West	15	4.3	3.7	14.8	4.7
North West	9	3.1	4.0	4.3	3.4
North East	8	4.0	19.0	7.5	11.0
Provincial Average	123	4.7	7.2	9.6	8.6

All Judges

Region	n	Total Penalties . DR	Total Penalties Self Represented	Major Penalties . DR	Major Penalties Self Represented
Female Judges	64	5.7	10.8	12.7	17.7
Male Judges	123	4.7	7.2	9.6	8.6
Provincial Average	187	5.1	8.4	10.8	11.5

Financial Data ( all regions in 1000 $’s )

Total Male Lump Sum

N = 119 Mean = 70.9 Median = 25.0 Total = 8437.1

0.8000 1.000 1.400 1.800 2.500 2.600 3.300 3.600 3.600 3.900 4.100 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.400 5.500 6.000 6.000 6.700 7.000 7.000 7.300 7.700 8.000 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.100 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.10 11.00 12.00 13.50 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 18.30 19.30 20.00 20.00 22.00 22.80 23.00 23.00 23.10 24.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 27.50 28.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 35.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 37.90 38.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 42.00 42.00 43.00 44.00 44.00 45.00 45.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 52.00 54.00 57.00 57.00 57.00 60.00 66.00 79.00 79.00 80.00 93.00 100.0 101.0 137.0 140.0 180.0 200.0 200.0 225.0 350.0 365.0 447.0 1000. 2400

Total Female Lump Sum

N = 2 Mean = 10.5 Total = 21.0

5.000 16.00

Total Lump Sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Total Lump Sum = Male Lump Sum + Female Lump Sum

= 8437.1 + 21.0 = 8458.1

% Male Lump Sum = (8437.1 / 8458.1) x 100 = 99.8 %

% Female Lump Sum = ( 21.0 / 8458.1) x 100 = 0.2 %

Total Male Imputed Income

N = 206 Mean = 88.4 Median = 35.0 Total = 18210.4

1.000 1.500 2.000 2.800 4.000 5.000 5.000 5.600 6.000 6.200 7.000 7.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.80 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.30 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 17.40 18.00 18.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.80 21.00 21.00 21.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 23.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.20 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 32.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 37.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 43.00 43.00 44.00 44.00 45.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 47.00 47.00 48.00 48.00 49.00 49.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 51.00 51.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 53.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 61.00 61.60 64.00 64.00 66.00 67.00 68.00 68.00 69.00 74.00 77.00 77.00 77.00 78.00 79.00 80.00 85.00 85.00 87.00 94.00 97.00 100.0 100.0 115.0 115.0 115.0 120.0 132.0 155.0 170.0 172.0 186.0 190.0 220.0 250.0 293.0 305.0 309.0 400.0 681.0 1120. 1900. 4755

Total Female Imputed Income

N = 30 Mean = 24.2 Median = 20.0 Total = 726.0

5.000 6.600 7.000 8.400 10.00 10.50 12.00 13.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 32.00 36.00 40.00 41.00 45.00 45.00 50.00 73.00

Imputed Income ( in 1000 $’s )

Total Income Imputed ( per year ) = Male Imputed Income + Female Imputed Income

= 18210.4+ 726.0 = 18936.4

% Male Income Imputed = (18210.4 / 18936.4 ) = 96.2 %

% Female Income Imputed = ( 726.0 / 18936.4 ) = 3.8 %

Total Male Cost Penalties

N = 397 Mean = 26.9 Median = 7.5 Total = 10679.3

0.9000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.100 1.100 1.200 1.200 1.300 1.400 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.600 1.700 1.700 1.800 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.300 2.300 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.600 2.800 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.100 3.200 3.300 3.300 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.800 3.800 3.800 3.800 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.100 4.100 4.300 4.300 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.700 4.700 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.500 5.700 5.800 5.800 5.800 5.900 5.900 5.900 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.200 6.400 6.400 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.600 6.800 6.900 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.200 7.200 7.300 7.400 7.400 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.800 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.200 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.600 8.700 8.800 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.200 9.300 9.400 9.500 9.600 9.700 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.20 10.50 10.60 10.80 10.90 11.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.10 12.10 12.40 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.60 12.80 13.40 13.50 13.60 14.00 14.30 14.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.50 15.70 15.70 15.80 16.00 16.20 16.50 16.60 17.00 17.00 17.80 17.90 18.00 18.00 18.50 18.90 19.30 19.50 19.50 19.50 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.30 20.60 21.30 22.00 22.50 22.50 23.90 24.40 25.00 25.00 25.00 28.00 28.70 30.60 31.00 31.40 31.50 32.00 33.80 34.00 34.00 34.00 34.00 34.30 35.00 35.00 36.00 36.40 36.90 38.00 38.00 39.00 39.50 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 42.00 42.00 44.00 44.70 45.00 45.00 45.90 46.00 46.80 48.00 48.60 49.00 49.00 50.00 50.70 51.00 56.00 58.70 60.90 64.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 75.00 85.00 85.80 87.90 90.00 91.60 93.00 95.00 103.4 112.4 117.0 144.6 150.0 183.0 183.8 200.0 275.0 320.0 370.0 997.7 2250

Total Female Cost Penalties

N = 117 Mean = 17.5 Median = 5.8 Total = 2047.5

0.1000 0.2000 0.2000 0.3000 0.3000 0.5000 0.7000 0.7000 0.8000 1.000 1.300 1.300 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.800 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.400 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.700 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.500 4.000 4.000 4.200 4.200 4.250 4.500 4.800 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.300 5.500 5.500 5.800 5.800 6.000 6.100 6.300 6.400 6.500 7.000 7.500 7.500 8.000 8.000 8.000 9.000 9.000 9.500 9.500 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 13.60 13.70 14.00 14.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 16.00 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 21.60 25.00 27.50 27.50 28.00 31.00 32.00 32.00 32.50 35.00 35.00 40.00 40.70 45.50 46.00 47.00 56.00 67.00 70.00 89.00 200.0 211.0 252.9

Cost Penalties ( in 1000 $’s )

Total Cost Penalties = Male Cost Penalties + Female Cost Penalties

= 10679.3 + 2047.5 = 12726.8

% Male Cost Penalties = (10679.3 / 12726.8) x 100 = 83.9 %

% Female Cost Penalties = (2047.5 / 12726.8) x 100 = 16.1 %

Lump sum monetary transfers totalled 8.45 million dollars and were 99.8 % against men. Imputed income totalled 18.94 million dollars per year and went 96.2 % against men. Cost penalties totalled 12.7 million dollars and went 83.9 % against men.

Penalties Against Self Represented Litigants

% SR = ( Self Represented Penalties / Penalties ) x 100

Region	Total Male Penalties % SR	Total Female Penalties % SR	Major Male Penalties % SR	Major Female Penalties % SR
Eastern	( 102 / 240 ) x 100	( 6 / 30 ) x 100	( 68 / 146 ) x 100	( 1 / 5 ) x 100
Toronto	( 72 / 276 ) x 100	( 10 / 37 ) x 100	( 56 / 209 ) x 100	( 6 / 11 ) x 100
Central East	( 71 / 226 ) x 100	( 6 / 37 ) x 100	( 54 / 167 ) x 100	( 3 / 19 ) x 100
Central South	( 50 / 211 ) x 100	( 10 / 47 ) x 100	( 33 / 133 ) x 100	( 5 / 16 ) x 100
Central West	( 59 / 182 ) x 100	( 7 / 52 ) x 100	( 47 / 121 ) x 100	( 2 / 12 ) x 100
South West	( 33 / 126 ) x 100	( 9 / 32 ) x 100	( 20 / 76 ) x 100	( 4 / 6 ) x 100
North West	( 45 / 100 ) x 100	( 9 / 33 ) x 100	( 27 / 53 ) x 100	( 6 / 12 ) x 100
North East	( 27 / 66 ) x 100	( 1 / 16 ) x 100	( 16 / 43 ) x 100	( 1 / 6 ) x 100
Provincial Average	(459 / 1427 ) x 100	( 58 / 282 ) x 100	( 321 / 954 ) x 100	( 28 / 88 ) x 100

Region	Total Male Penalties % SR	Total Female Penalties % SR	Major Male Penalties % SR	Major Female Penalties % SR
Eastern	42.5 %	20.0 %	46.6 %	20.0 %
Toronto	26.1 %	27.0 %	26.8 %	54.5 %
Central East	31.4 %	16.2 %	32.3 %	15.8 %
Central South	23.6 %	21.2 %	24.8 %	31.3 %
Central West	32.4 %	13.5 %	38.8 %	16.7 %
South East	26.1 %	31.0	26.3 %	66.7 %
North West	45.0 %	27.3 %	50.9 %	50.0 %
North East	40.9 %	6.3 %	37.2 %	16.7 %
Provincial Average	32.2 %	20.6 %	33.8 %	31.8 %