Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Central South Ontario Judicial
Region Summary
Nov 2008
Central
South Region Penalties and Cost
Penalties Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Cs – Central South Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented
litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Lafrenierre |
F |
Cs |
|
4 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
McLaren |
F |
Cs |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Millanetti |
F |
Cs |
|
4 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
|
5 |
4 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Walters |
F |
Cs |
|
4 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Borkovich |
M |
Cs |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
|
8 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Fedak |
M |
Cs |
|
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
|
6 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
|
15 |
5 |
|
9 |
2 |
|
|
6 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
|
8 |
3 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
|
29 |
6 |
|
19 |
5 |
|
|
9 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
|
27 |
1 |
|
16 |
1 |
|
|
5 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Harris |
M |
Cs |
|
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
|
10 |
2 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Lofchik |
M |
Cs |
|
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Marshall |
M |
Cs |
|
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
|
13 |
2 |
|
9 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
|
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Pazaratz |
M |
Cs |
|
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Quinn |
M |
Cs |
|
11 |
6 |
|
9 |
5 |
|
|
5 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Reilly |
M |
Cs |
|
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Sheppard |
M |
Cs |
|
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Scime |
M |
Cs |
|
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
|
5 |
3 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Steinberg |
M |
Cs |
|
4 |
1 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
|
7 |
1 |
|
6 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Taylor |
M |
Cs |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
|
16 |
4 |
|
10 |
3 |
|
|
4 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
|
8 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Female Judges |
5 |
|
|
19 |
7 |
|
13 |
4 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Male judges |
25 |
|
|
192 |
43 |
|
122 |
29 |
|
|
44 |
9 |
|
15 |
4 |
|
Total |
30 |
|
|
211 |
50 |
|
133 |
33 |
|
|
47 |
10 |
|
16 |
5 |
Central
South Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums
missing 3
N = 13 Mean =
24.6 Total = 319.8
5.000 8.500 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 15.00 20.00 27.50 35.00 41.00 45.00 79.00
Male Imputed Income missing
1
N = 25 Mean =
32.6 Total = 815.0
1.000 7.000 7.800 8.000 9.000 9.000 10.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 23.30 28.00 32.00 35.00 37.00 40.00 44.00 47.00 50.00 55.00 58.00 60.00 78.00 100.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 90 Mean =
17.9 Total =1611.0
0.3000 0.5000 0.7000 0.7000 0.8000 0.8000 0.8000 1.000 1.000 1.100 1.200 1.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.100 2.400 2.600 2.800 3.000 3.000 3.100 3.200 3.500 3.500 3.800 4.000 4.100 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 5.800 5.900 5.900 5.900 6.000 6.400 6.400 6.800 6.900 7.000 7.400 7.400 7.500 7.800 8.000 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.700 9.400 10.00 10.00 10.30 10.60 11.00 12.50 12.50 13.40 13.60 14.30 14.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.70 17.90 18.90 19.50 20.30 20.60 22.00 22.50 23.90 32.00 34.30 39.00 40.00 44.70 46.00 50.00 58.70 75.00 90.00 103.4 112.4 144.6 150.0
Female Cost Penalties
N = 27 Mean =
24.3 Total = 655.0
0.1000 0.8000 1.500 2.000 2.400 2.500 3.000 3.000 5.200 5.300 6.400 9.000 9.500 9.500 10.00 13.60 15.00 16.00 31.00 32.00 32.00 35.00 35.00 40.70 45.50 89.00 200.0
Central
South Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E
– eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
Lafreniere |
F |
Cs |
F |
M |
Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs of interim motion reserverved for trial judge |
|
Lafreniere |
F |
Cs |
F |
M |
Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
45.0 |
24 K lump sum paid, 21 K ordered for arrears of child support |
|
Lafreniere |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
Fletcher v. McDonnell, 2005 CanLII 23108 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 9 years prejudgment interest on 57 K |
|
Lafrenierre |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
9.0 |
Man claims 15 K imputed to 26 K |
|
Mclaren |
F |
Cs |
M |
M |
Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
1.0 |
Man s income drops. Minor 1 K imputation added to his claim instead of 9 K asked |
|
McLaren |
F |
Cs |
M |
M |
Patterson v. Patterson, 2007 CanLII 26288 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
144.6 |
Divorce action, wife successful on 4 out of 6 issues, wife asks 342 K and gets 144.6 K |
|
Milanetti |
F |
Cs |
M |
M |
Graham v. Graham,
2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
100.0 |
Man declares 100 K income and is imputed to 200 K, 10 K per month total interim support, 35 K interim disbursement to wife |
|
Milanetti |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
Lowry v. Kushnir, 2007 CanLII 18146 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
3.0 |
Motion, wife asks 75 K in costs and gets 25 K, and wife gets 3 K in cost for case conference |
|
Millanetti |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.0 |
Wife gets 40 K costs |
|
Millanetti |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive interim possession, 10 K per month combined support |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Armstrong v. Armstrong,
2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
37.0 |
Man on disability imputed to 47 K per year, lump sum retroactive support |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Restraining order against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive lump sum for support, imputed income |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
F |
M |
Danis v. Danis,
2004 CanLII 8245 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
47.0 |
Man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Gill v. Knack, 2007 CanLII 1332 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
Only remaining issue was Christmas access, 3.5 K costs |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Siconolfi v. Siconolfi, 2007 CanLII 1327 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.0 |
Divorce action partially settled, wife asks 15.5 K gets 7 K |
|
Walters |
F |
Cs |
sr |
|
Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
|
4 K retroactiver child support award to be paid $ 50 per month, supervised access changed to unsupervised |
|
Walters |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
Royston v. Royston, 2003 CanLII 1978 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Walters |
F |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
T.P.S. v. K.E.S, 2007 CanLII 17382 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mans assets frozen, man violates order, wife abducts children |
|
Walters |
F |
Cs |
F |
M |
Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man gets interim supervised access, continued by Scott J, wife gets custody and access restored in agreement |
|
Gordon |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 17600 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
17.9 |
Divorce action, 17.9 K costs |
|
Borkovich |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Bremer v. Bremer, 2005 CanLII 6387 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K costs incurred by wife due to husbands intransience |
|
Borkovitch |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Bremer v. Bremer, 2004 CanLII 17346 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife awarded prejudgment interest |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Kreutzer v. Corbeil, 2005 CanLII 6395 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, and pays occupancy rent |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
R. v. R., 2000 CanLII 22425 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on retroactive support, 20 K child support per month and 5 K spousal support |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 19446 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, man pays spousal support |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Ruscinski v.
Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 9982 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for assault, 5 K damages, court denies permanent restraining order, supervised access changed to joint custody with primary residence with wife, 2.3 K per month total support, wife gets exclusive possession of home |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Ruscinski v. Ruscinski, 2006 CanLII 9982 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Domestic assault, supervised access, joint custody at trial, lump sum, imputed income, 2.4 K per month total support, non harassment order, 4 K damages for assault |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Tessarolo v Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 25108 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
5.0 |
Lump sum 5 K compensatory support, life insurance as security |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Tessarolo v Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 25108 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Lump sum 5 K compensatory support, life insurance as security |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Tessarolo v. Tessarolo, 2005 CanLII 30882 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.0 |
Wife asks for 6 K, husband asks for 12 K, wife gets 10 K |
|
Fedak |
M |
Cw |
sr |
sr |
Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man under restraining order not to see children |
|
Fedak |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Ragis v. Ragis, 2005 CanLII 18854 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.0 |
Divorce action, only issue left for trial was support, 10 K costs |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order for verbal arguments against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive support lump sum, imputed income |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Keen v. Keen, 2007 CanLII 6919 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.5 |
3.5 K interim motion |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets long term exclusive possession for 6 more years, man pays child support but not spousal |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
F |
F |
S.P. v. F.R., 2006 CanLII 19948 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.3 |
Divorce action, wife asks 25 K and gets 20 .3 K, husband Asks 30.3 K |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Sheppard v. Sheppard, 2005 CanLII 30878 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Prejudgment interest awarded as lump sum, 8 K per month support, 1.2 million equalization to be paid in installments of 200 K |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Sheppard v. Sheppard, 2005 CanLII 30878 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Atkinson v. Atkinson, 2007 CanLII 14318 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
14.5 |
Divorce trial. 14.5 K |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Boddington v. Boddington, 2003 CanLII 45771 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.5 |
8.5 K costs of motion |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Claer v. Claer, 2006 CanLII 32612 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Motion, wife asks 8.5 K gets 5 K |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Cupolo v. Anzovino, 2003 CanLII 2091 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
1.0 |
1K for ex parte divorce, requested 11 K |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Del Net v. Benger,
2003 CanLII 2096 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
6.8 |
Mother allowed to move with child, 6.8 K costs |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
sr |
L |
Duquette v. Gregorio, 2006 CanLII 32615 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.4 |
2.4 Kcosts for access motion |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Eberl v. Eberl, 2004 CanLII 10617 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
28.0 |
Man laid off from job is imputed to 28 K and it’s ordered no variations until his income exceeds 28 K, court refuses to impute income to wife, Man must pay spousal support and $ 500 per month in child support |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Johannesson v. Johannesson, 2003 CanLII 2141 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.1 |
Contempt access motion by husband, 2.1 K costs |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Lagos v. Lagos, 2006 CanLII 43492 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
6.9 |
Motion, 6.9 K costs |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 34782 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Husband must designate wife as beneficiary of his insurance policy |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
McKinnon v. McKinnon, 2004 CanLII 47798 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
19.5 |
72 K retroactive support, 19.5 K costs |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
L |
M |
Miner v. Miner,
2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
44.0 |
Man claims 117 K and is imputed to 161 K, 70 K support lump as part of agreement before guidelines came into effect |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Nittel v. Nittel, 2007 CanLII 14340 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
22.0 |
Divorce action 22 K |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Platonova v. Platonov, 2005 CanLII 2951 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Divorce action, self represented wife gets 2 K costs against intrasient husband |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Vernon v. Vernon, 2006 CanLII 23266 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Motion for support, wifes partial lawyers bill 47 K, 15 K costs |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Ashley v. Ashley, 2006 CanLII 32603 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.0 |
Support motion, 8 K costs |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Defoe v. Defoe, 2004 CanLII 5040 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.2 |
Divorce action, all but support settled on consent, wife gets 1.2 K |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Erb v. Erb, 2003 CanLII 2308 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
18.9 |
Divorce action, wife asks 23.8 K gets 18.9 K |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Harnum v. Harnum, 2005 CanLII 3231 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
12.5 |
12.6 K costs for 2 day trial |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
13.6 |
Wife gets interim exclusive possession, man declares bankruptcy, 13.6 K costs for trial |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim exclusive possession, man declares bankruptcy, 13.6 K costs for trial |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Visneskie v. Visneskie, 2003 CanLII 2265 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Wood v. Wood, 2004 CanLII 14407 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
23.9 |
Wife gets 23.9 K for divorce action |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Failure to provide disclosure, default on ordered return of funds results in unequal division with man prohibited from claiming debts to wife in his bankruptcy |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Proceeds from home held in trust and disbursed to wife, life insurabce as security for support |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 47755 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
FRO takes mans drivers license and the court refuses to hear motion for relief |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
L |
Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 26600 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.5 |
12.5 K for motion for constructive trust and retroactive support from bankrupt husband |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Conway v. Conway,
2005 CanLII 14136 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
13.5 |
13.5 K lump sum for support, 6 K for equalization |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Craig v. Craig, 2004 CanLII 5039 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.4 |
Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
F.J.N. v. J.L.N., 2004 CanLII 34783 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
15.0 |
Divorce action including mobility, wife asks 20.2 K gets 15 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.9 |
1 day simple trial, 5.9 K costs |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Hunter v. Hunter, 2005 CanLII 22139 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 67 K equalization payment |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2002 CanLII 2700 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.2 |
Interim motion, wife asks 4.6 K and gets 3.2 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Lee-Chin v. Lee-Chin, 2005 CanLII 47758 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
13.4 |
Several interim motions consolidated into one hearing, wife asks 29.9 K gets 13.4 K, husband asks 37.1 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Lindahl v. Lindahl, 2005 CanLII 34583 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, children live in home man and wife switch each week, wife moves to US and court allows her mobility while she has children |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
MacGregor v. MacGregor, 2002 CanLII 2752 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Wife alleges husband has a drinking problem, access supervised by husbands mother |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Mayer v. Mayer, 2003 CanLII 2177 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
Interim motion on parenting schedule, 4.5 K costs, mutual non depletion and harassment order on consent |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2006 CanLII 11921 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order against man kept in effect but charging or vesting order denied |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Picollo v. Picollo,
2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion and harassment order, wife gets support, wife get exclusive possession of home on consent |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Neither oppose mutual non harassment and non depletion orders, older sons live with man, no custody or child support order, 3.2 K per month spousal support to wife |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Plotz v. Boehmer-Plotz, 2004 CanLII 34349 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.5 |
Support variation dismissed, 8.5 K costs |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Purves v. Purves, 2004 CanLII 6249 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, fathers income imputed from 18 to 25 K per year, joint custody changed to sole custody to mother |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Fathers unsupervised access reduced to supervised |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
15.0 |
15 K lump sum for retroactive support, life insurance policy as security |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Secure life insurance in wifes name of almost 1 million for spousal of $ 4500 per month |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
50 K held from sale of home for wife uequal division claim |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
150.0 |
Divorce action, wife wins mobility, asks 190 K and gets 150 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
L |
Sheikh v. Sheikh,
2005 CanLII 34589 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
20.0 |
Man pays lump sum of 20 K for back support, equalization of 80 K and costs of 150 K, mother allowed to move to England with child |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Stockie v. Stockie,
2003 CanLII 2353 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
42 K RRSP to be preserved and 100 K security deposit to the court |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Tughan v. Tughan,
2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
60.0 |
Man is unemployed and income is imputed to 60.6 K per year |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.9 |
5.9 K for motion |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
10.0 |
Man claims 19 K income from compensation and is imputed to almost 30 K as underemployed, 45 K arrears reduced to 40 K arrears |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Brandon v. Brandon, 2003 CanLII 2069 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.7 |
Access motion to determine where children go to school, 0.7 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Buck v. Buck, 2003 CanLII 2072 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.5 |
Unnecesary motion, 8.5 K costs, wife gets proceeds from sale of home as advance on equalization |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Cauchy-Eckardt v. Eckardt, 2004 CanLII 6225 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.4 |
Support motion, wife asks 8 K and gets 7.4 K |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Crewe v. Crewe, 2006 CanLII 3656 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
4 months interim supervised access continued by Sills J, 2 ˝ hours every second Sunday |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
9.0 |
Unemployed man imputed to 9 K and 40 K arrears rescind, arrears reinstated on appeal |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Eberl v. Eberl, 2004 CanLII 10617 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Non dissipation order |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Fleming v. Fleming, 2005 CanLII 19832 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
Motion to vary access to unsupervised dismissed, 0.8 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Fleming v. Fleming, 2005 CanLII 19832 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Motion to vary access to unsupervised dismissed, 0.8 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Fulmer v. Kaleo-Fulmer, 2002 CanLII 2719 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.6 |
2.6 K costs for custody variation motion, changed to sole custody to wife |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Gentle v. Gentle, 2007 CanLII 26606 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.8 |
Motion to vary support. 3.8 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets interim exclusive possession and custody of children |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2004 CanLII 6232 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.1 |
Summary judgment on s.7 expenses and travel consent, 1.1 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2004 CanLII 6232 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on s.7 expenses and travel consent, 1.1 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Plotz v. Boehmer-Plotz, 2004 CanLII 34349 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
5.8 |
Support variation dismissed, 5.8 K costs, previous 15 K cost award unpaid, 27 K arrears |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Purvis v. Purvis, 2003 CanLII 18186 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.7 |
Interim motion $ 700 costs, man must pay equalization based on property evaluation 55 K above sale price |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
R.W.L. v. K.A.L., 2003 CanLII 2168 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.9 |
Husband brings motion for custody assessment and access, 5.9 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
R.W.L. v. K.A.L., 2003 CanLII 2168 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Access to be at wifes discretion |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
L |
R.W.L. v. K.A.L.,
l2003 CanLII 2453 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man first charged with assault takes anger management, second charges, wife gets custody, third party child center exchanges, makes allegations to Childrens Aid, access cut and must take parenting class |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 34788 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
58.7 |
Separation agreement varied, 58.7 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 34788 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 5 % on 10 K for 6 years and 3 months |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 2004 CanLII 35095 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
79.0 |
79 K lump sum for retroactive support, separation agreement overturned, spousal support increased from $ 400 to 1.2 K per month |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.5 |
Divorce action, 7.5 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
18.0 |
Man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Smith v. Lennox, 2004 CanLII 51969 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mans supervised access at access center terminated and access at wifes discretion at a secure safe place |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Tzeng v. Tzeng, 2007 CanLII 17042 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
112.4 |
Wife gets 112.4 K costs in assault action against husband, 150 K damage award |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Von Feilitz v. Von Feilitz, 2002 CanLII 2821 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
0.8K for previous interim motion |
|
Harris |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Costa v. Costa, 2002 CanLII 2708 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
34.3 |
Divorce action, 5 day trial, wife asks 41.7 K and gets 34.3 K |
|
Harris |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Fahandezh v. Fahandezh Sadi, 2002 CanLII 2734 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Harris |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Leng v. Marini, 2006 CanLII 27872 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
D |
|
Man must pay 6.7 K in previous costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Cianflone v. Cianflone, 2006 CanLII 37127 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
14.3 |
Divorce action no kids 14.3 K costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Appeal of support variance, 2 K costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Keen v. Keen, 2007 CanLII 6919 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
9.4 |
Divorce action settled on consent except support, 9.4 costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Little v. Little,
2002 CanLII 2797 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Insurance for security, vesting order on house, 2.1 K per month spousal support, 20 K equalization |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Longpre v. Skursky, 2005 CanLII 31301 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.3 |
Motion to vary support dismissed, $ 250 costs unless higher bill approved |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
F |
F |
MacGregor v. Stone, 2004 CanLII 42944 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
50.0 |
Divorce trial, 50 K costs, 7.5 K costs of appeal |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Racz v. Racz, 2004 CanLII 39025 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
Divorce action settled on consent, 4.5 K costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Racz v. Racz, 2004 CanLII 39025 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets $ 354 prejudgment interest and 4.5 K costs |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 14151 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, $457 child support per month and $ 1500 spousal support |
|
Henderson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Zeleny v. Zeleny, 2004 CanLII 5094 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.8 |
Wife agreed to pay lawyer $ 90 per hour but judge raises it to $ 195, 7.8 K for one motion |
|
Lofchik |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
DeMarco v. DeMarco, 2005 CanLII 6389 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets restraining order continued, pleadings struck |
|
Lofchik |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Galambos v. Towers, 2006 CanLII 29661 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
44.7 |
Divorce action no children, wife asks for 60.4 K and gets 44.7 K |
|
Lofchik |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Galambos-Towers v. Towers, 2005 CanLII 44386 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
Vague imputation of 20 K per year to underearning asset results in $ 200 per month spousal support, property equalization of 122 K to wife |
|
Marshall |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Goyal v. Singh, 2002 CanLII 2748 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Father given supervised access, wife makes allegations and denies access, court orders investigation by Office of the Childrens Lawyer |
|
Marshall |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Mancuso v. Mancuso, 2004 CanLII 43770 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
32.0 |
Mans divorce trial costs lowered to 32 K on appeal, 10 K costs for appeal |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Chapin v. Chapin, 2003 CanLII 2080 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
Support variation, $ 750 costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Flewelling v. Flewelling, 2007 CanLII 16442 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.0 |
Motion unsuccessfully appealed 6 K costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Grant v. Grant, 2005 CanLII 47703 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on motion to vary support, man is unemployed, 53 K arrears, unstated costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
8.5 |
8.5 K spousal support lump sum |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Hines v. Hines, 2007 CanLII 2208 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.1 |
Support action, 3.1 K costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Loy v. Loy, 2005
CanLII 27606 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Life insurance policy against 8 K per month support |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Majkut-Giammarco v. Giammarco, 2004 CanLII 34797 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Denied trial |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Niro v. Niro, 2004 CanLII 5068 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Husbands claim against his ex wife and lawyers for fraud is struck |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
103.4 |
Divorce action with 9 days of trial involving constructive trust, 103.4 K costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Man uses false information to get exclusive possession at ex parte hearing, costs 103 K |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Parnell v. Viger, 2005 CanLII 8665 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Equalization and costs secured against home, and house to be sold if man loses. |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Rawlins v. Rawlins, 2006 CanLII 28560 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
8.7 |
Variation, wife asks 25.7 K and gets 8.7 K |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Richards v. Burch, 2003 CanLII 2223 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, both charged with assault, charges against wife withdrawn, man signs peace bond, wife gets custody |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Barrick v. Barrick, 2006 CanLII 1317 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
8.0 |
Man goes bankrupt, claims 32 K, imputed to 40 K, Must pay 1 K per month spousal support |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Juvatopolos v. Juvatopolos, 2004 CanLII 34843 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man imputed to 50 K, wife underemployed and reduced from receiving 1.4 K to 1.2 K, then enters another relationship and support reduced to $ 400, wife mild |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Reitsma v.
Reitsma-Leadsom, 2005 CanLII 47609 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault and then breach of probation, assault used as a reason for extending spousal support |
|
Pazaratz |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Damian v. Damian, 2007 CanLII 18021 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.6 |
Divorce action, wife asks 15.2 K and gets 10.6 K |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
55.0 |
Man intentionally unemployed imputed to 55 K, wife imputed to 32 K, Man pays $ 800 per month in support, wife mild |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
J.B. v. A.B., 2006 CanLII 12294 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
Man fired from job imputed to 50 K per year |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
46.0 |
Man accused of being abusive and threatening lawyer and assessor, court orders termination of access and restrictions on motions, 46 K costs |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man accused of being abusive and threatening lawyer and assessor, court orders termination of access and restrictions on motions, 46 K costs |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
J.L.C. v. S.B.L., 2006 CanLII 13759 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Unsupervised then a dozen motions on access before trial, supervised, more motions, access denied, must seek leave for more motions, mental illness, 46 K cost penalty wife makes allegations to Childrens Aid |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
F |
F |
Logan v. Logan, 2004 CanLII 195 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.5 |
Interim motion for evidence, wife asks 1.5 K gets 0.5 K costs |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Plett v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2199 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Summary judgment on mans motion because his settled intention has already been ruled |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Man gets 2 counts of contempt for harassment order, suspended sentence, ordered to say something nice about the other party on access |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Taylor v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 42952 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
10 K compensatory lump sum support, 19 K equalization |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Taylor v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 42952 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets 2 restraining orders, man in jail for third breach misses trial, 19 K equalization, 10 K compensatory support |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Worthington v. Worthington, 2000 CanLII 22469 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Supervised access changed to no access |
|
Reilly |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Mahood v. Mahood, 2005 CanLII 19841 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man given reasonable supervised access, complains of access denials, support increased |
|
Reilly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault takes peace bond, wife gets custody, wife moves to Fiji |
|
Reilly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Reid v. Mulder, 2006 CanLII 9981 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.4 |
Divorce action, wife allowed to move to fiji with child, no costs for custody but 6.4 K for financial |
|
Scime |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 11194 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
10 K lump sum for spousal support arrears |
|
Scime |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Butsky-Plekan v. Plekan, 2005 CanLII 25103 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
75.0 |
Divorce, wife asks 117 K and gets 75 K, husband asks 306 K |
|
Sheppard |
M |
Cs |
sr |
L |
Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of home, non harassment order, interim custody |
|
Sheppard |
M |
Cs |
sr |
L |
Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of home, non harassment order, interim custody |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Bolentiru v. Radulescu, 2004 CanLII 34775 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
20.6 |
Divorce action marriage declared invalid, wife asks 45.4 K gets 20.6 K |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Bolentiru v. Radulescu, 2004 CanLII 6239 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
27.5 |
15 K and 12.5 K for damages. Marriage declared invalid |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Demetriou v. Demetriou, 2006 CanLII 16364 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
7.0 |
$ 222 child support and $ 400 spousal support, man claims income of 18 K and is imputed to 25 K and wife makes 16.3 K |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Loebsack v. Loebsack, 2004 CanLII 16872 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Divorce action, wife gets 5 K costs |
|
Sills |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Roseneck v. Gowling, 2002 CanLII 45128 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession |
|
Steinberg |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Edgar v. Sikora, 2004 CanLII 13394 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs of interim motion |
|
Steinberg |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
F.(J.) v. C.(V.) (No. 7), 2002 CanLII 46717 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
90.0 |
Divorce action with 73 day trial, wife asks 290 K and gets 90 K |
|
Steinberg |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Roach v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 1991 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of harassment, wife cuts his access to his child, man beats up wife’s boyfriend and is put in jail, restraining order access to child terminated. |
|
Steinburg |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Roach v. Kelly, 2003 CanLII 1991 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Supervised access, criminal harassment and assault charges, jailed, access terminated by court order |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
32.0 |
Man claims 41 K income and is imputed to 73 K, variation denied, drivers license taken away |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Lump sum but less than requested. Court overrules separation agreement for default in payments |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
40.0 |
Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
35.0 |
Lump sum of 35 K which is less than originally ordered. Court overrules separation agreement |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Vanderzalm v.
Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
78.0 |
Man claims income of 61 K per year and is imputed to 139 K |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Wiltshire v. Wiltshire, 2005 CanLII 370 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
41.0 |
41 K lump sum to be paid for arrears of support equalization and costs |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Zeoli v. Field, 2003 CanLII 2361 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
False allegations and criminal charges lead to supervised access, custody eventually reversed to father |
|
Taylor |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Martin v. Blanchard, 2007 CanLII 26611 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.7 |
Spousal support 2 day trial, 15.7 K |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Beal v. Beal,
2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
22.5 |
Wife gets 22. 5 K costs for divorce action which is roughly equal to what she owes husband for equalization |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Beal v. Beal,
2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
35.0 |
Man claims his company doesn’t make a profit and is imputed to 35 K, arrears 19 K, wife is unemployed and imputed to 19 K, $ 500 per month spousal support no children |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Beal v. Beal,
2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of pension benefits including death benefits |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Hachey v. Hachey, 2007 CanLII 52987 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 90 K, wife claims 14 K per year and is imputed to 35 K, 1 K per month spousal support 0.7 K child support, 3 K costs of interim motion |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Hachey v. Hachey, 2007 CanLII 52987 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 35629 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.8 |
Wife asks 45 K and gets 2.8 K in divorce action |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Kloosterman v. Kloosterman, 2006 CanLII 9601 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 250 per month spousal support, $ 839 per month child support |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Mitton v. Mitton, 2007 CanLII 4323 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
7.4 |
Support motion, 7.4 K costs, 4 K retroactive support |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 30710 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest on part of equalization |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Pasichnyk v. Pasichnyk, 2005 CanLII 46745 (ON S.C. |
mj |
Cts |
39.0 |
Divorce action, husband declares bankruptcy, 39 K costs, 30 K is related to support and survives bankruptcy. |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
11.0 |
11 K costs of support variation, 20 K arrears, 10 K s.7 arrears, husband declared bankruptcy, imputed income |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
S.D. v. R.D., 2006 CanLII 35978 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man accused of sexually abusing infant daughter first gets supervised access then access is terminated despite passing a lie detector |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
19.0 |
Man declares 46 K but is imputed to 65 K for not working overtime |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Vangroenigen v.
Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
10 K lump for final settlement of spousal support, intentionally unemployed due to not working overtime |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Vangroenigen v.
Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Mans share of home held as security for support, 10 K lump to settle spousal support, imputed income for not working overtime, man must designate children as beneficiary of life insurance policy |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Young v. Staruck, 2006 CanLII 28111 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.1 |
Child support variation, 4.1 K |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
sr |
L |
Bukvic v. Bukvic, 2007 CanLII 14323 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
58.0 |
Man is unemployed imputed vto former 58 K income $ 1650 per month support |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Ip |
23.3 |
Man is intentionally unemployed and has an income imputed to him, he declares 6.7 K and is imputed to 30 K, changed to 16.5 K on appeal |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2003 CanLII 48241 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
15 K costs of trial and 9.5 K costs of appeal, and 1.5 K costs of stay motion, all to be enforced by FRO, 6 K security for appeal |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Grant v. Stemmler, 2006 CanLII 9972 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.0 |
Interim motion 4 K costs |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Shamblaw v. Anger, 2005 CanLII 44380 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.0 |
Support determination 1 K costs |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 CanLII 44981 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Cts |
10.3 |
10.3 K costs 69 K arrears, 274 K equalization payment, upheld on appeal , 22.5 K costs of appeal |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Taylor v. Taylor, 2002 CanLII 41990 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Prejudgment interest on 274 K equalization payment, upheld on appeal, 22.5 K costs of appeal |
|
Whitten |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Weismiller v. Jolkowski, 2000 CanLII 22518 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
7.8 |
Man imputed 7.8 K, 10 % of income for history of bonuses |
2) Penalties Against
Women
|
Millanetti |
F |
Cs |
M |
sr |
S.D. v. T.D., 2005 CanLII 23681 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Restraining order, pleadings struck, ex parte motion, supervised access |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Restraining order against man changed to mutual restraining order, access restored, contact at access allowed, retroactive lump sum for support, imputed income |
|
Tucker |
F |
Cs |
M |
F |
St. Louis v. St. Louis, 2007 CanLII 11730 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
10.0 |
Divorce action, husband seeks 21 K gets 10 K |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Belanger v. Belanger, 2005 CanLII 30867 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.5 |
9.5 K costs of support variation against wife, husband has custody |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Collins v. Trimble, 2005 CanLII 25109 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
After separation wife charged with assault, man gets custody |
|
Cavarzan |
M |
Cs |
|
|
Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Man gets exclusive possession provided he pays 50 K deposit on equalization, wife gets kids and support |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Graham v. Kuntz, 2005 CanLII 44387 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
9.0 |
Support variation, 9 K costs |
|
Festeryga |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Harrington v. Harrington, 2007 CanLII 27754 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
89.0 |
Divorce action, husband asks 129 K gets 89 K |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Debruyn v. Debruyn, 2005 CanLII 11206 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
9.5 |
Divorce action, wife gets 9.5 K costs and her lawyer gets 5 K costs and can’t bill wife for trial time |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
F |
sr |
Duquette v. Gregorio, 2006 CanLII 32615 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.4 |
Motion for expanded access, 2.4 K costs |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 16229 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
16.0 |
Husband asks 58 K and gets 16 K in support variation |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Munro v. Munro, 2005 CanLII 22142 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion, wife and lawyer don’t attend first motion, 3 K costs to wife, 1 K costs to wifes lawyer |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Rossi v. Rossi, 2005 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
35.0 |
3 day trial of support variation, 35 K cost penalty |
|
Flynn |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
S.D. v. T.D., 2005 CanLII 23681 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Wife pleadings struck, uncontested trial, man gets custody, restraining order, 7.5 K costs |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Balaban v. Balaban, 2007 CanLII 7990 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.4 |
Husbands motion to terminate support, 6.4 K costs |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Cornaz v. Cornaz-Nikyuluw, 2005 CanLII 47770 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
31.0 |
Hague convention case to return child to husband, husband asks 62 K gets 31 K |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
F |
sr |
Hoddinott v. Hoddinott, 2002 CanLII 2791 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
13.6 |
Divorce action 13.6 K costs |
|
Glithero |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Visneskie v. Visneskie, 2003 CanLII 2264 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
45.5 |
Divorce action, husband asks for 54.5 K and gets 45.5 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Takis v. Takis, 2003 CanLII 2256 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
32.0 |
Divorce action, husband asks 64 K and gets 32 K |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Lindahl v. Lindahl, 2005 CanLII 34583 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, children live in home man and wife switch each week, wife moves to US and court allows her mobility while she has children |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2006 CanLII 32637 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
32.0 |
Interim motions, wife claims 115 K paid to lawyers, husband claims 60 K, 32 K costs |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Picollo v. Picollo,
2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion and harassment order, wife gets support |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Picollo v. Picollo, 2004 CanLII 50314 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Neither oppose mutual non harassment and non depletion orders, older sons live with man, no custody or child support order, 3.2 K per month spousal support to wife |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
Sr |
M |
Purves v. Purves, 2004 CanLII 6249 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, fathers income imputed from 18 to 25 K per year |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
L |
L |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
45.0 |
Wife imputed to 42 K. Man has custody but pays wife $ 185 per month total support, minor |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 19785 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Interim motion, 3 K costs |
|
Gordon D |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Stockie v. Stockie, 2003 CanLII 2352 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Interim motion, 2 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
|
|
Balaban v. Balaban, 2004 CanLII 47801 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
8.4 |
Wife imputed 8.4 K rental income, wife recieves 1.5 K per month support |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Bjornson v. Creighton, 2007 CanLII 14321 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
|
Interim motion, 1.5 K costs |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Girard v. Girard, 2007 CanLII 28740 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.1 |
Interim access motion not needed, costs to husband $ 100 |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Hockey-Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2002 CanLII 2721 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
200.0 |
Divorce action, wife acts unreasonably, 200 K costs asnd 15 K costs of appeal, husband gets custody and must pay 5 K per month spousal support |
|
Hambly |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Tucker v. Tucker, 2002 CanLII 2761 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.2 |
Motion to vary support, 5.2 K costs |
|
Harris |
M |
Cs |
sr |
M |
Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 43349 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Interim motion, wifes lawyer doesn’t respond, 1.5 K costs |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Parnell v. Viger, 2004 CanLII 27183 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Man uses false information to get exclusive possession at ex parte hearing, costs 103 K |
|
Matheson |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Richards v. Burch, 2003 CanLII 2223 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order, both charged with assault, charges against wife withdrawn, man signs peace bond, wife gets custody |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Juvatopolos v. Juvatopolos, 2004 CanLII 34843 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Man imputed to 50 K, wife underemployed and reduced from receiving 1.4 K to 1.2 K, then enters another relationship and support reduced to $ 400, wife mild |
|
Mazza |
M |
Cs |
F |
M |
Raguckas v. Raguckas, 2007 CanLII 2360 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
40.7 |
Divorce action, 40.7 K |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Woman gets 30 days jail for selling farm her husband lived on, must pay the 22 K withheld to husband |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
sr |
sr |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
32.0 |
Man intentionally unemployed imputed to 55 K, wife imputed to 32 K, Man pays $ 800 per month in support, wife mild |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.5 |
2.5 K costs for contempt motion |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Kassay v. Kassay, 2000 CanLII 22444 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Wife found in contempt for denial of access, no consequences this time but jail if it happens again |
|
Quinn JW |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Riss v. Greenough, 2003 CanLII 2224 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.3 |
5.3 K for 2 motions |
|
Taliano |
M |
Cs |
M |
F |
Calvert v. Calvert, 2002 CanLII 2706 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Man gets exclusive possession, he must pay wife $ 500 per month spousal support |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
sr |
F |
Beal v. Beal,
2005 CanLII 30326 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
19.0 |
Man claims his company doesn’t make a profit and is imputed to 35 K, arrears 19 K, wife is unemployed and imputed to 19 K, $ 500 per month spousal support no children |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
L |
Bolduc v. Bolduc, 2006 CanLII 35976 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
15.0 |
Trial, husband claims 25 K gets 15 K |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
sr |
Mizzau v. Barnes, 2006 CanLII 21596 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
6.0 |
Wife declares a 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K and must pay child support, some recission of arrears for period of unemployment |
|
Turnbull |
M |
Cs |
M |
M |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 8024 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.8 |
Interim motion, 0.8 K costs |