Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
South West Ontario Judicial Region
Summary
Nov 2008
South
West Region Penalties and Cost Penalties
Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Sw – South West Region
# p – number of
penalties # sr – number of
penalties to self represented litigants
|
|
Penalties Against Men |
|
|
Penalties Against Women |
|||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|
|
Total |
|
Major |
|||||||
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
|
# p |
# sr |
|
# p |
# sr |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
|
5 |
4 |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
|
14 |
3 |
|
9 |
2 |
|
|
5 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
Morrisette |
F |
Sw |
|
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Nolan |
F |
Sw |
|
3 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
|
5 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Templeton |
F |
Sw |
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Abbey |
M |
Sw |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Brokenshire |
M |
Sw |
|
3 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
|
19 |
6 |
|
11 |
3 |
|
|
7 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
|
8 |
3 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Dandie |
M |
Sw |
|
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
|
7 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Ducharme |
M |
Sw |
|
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
|
5 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Harper |
M |
Sw |
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
|
12 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
|
4 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Kennedy |
M |
Sw |
|
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
|
6 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Quinn JG |
M |
Sw |
|
7 |
5 |
|
7 |
5 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Rogin |
M |
Sw |
|
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
|
11 |
2 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Female |
|
6 |
|
31 |
11 |
|
17 |
6 |
|
|
10 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
Male |
|
15 |
|
95 |
22 |
|
59 |
14 |
|
|
22 |
6 |
|
4 |
3 |
|
Total |
|
22 |
|
126 |
33 |
|
76 |
20 |
|
|
32 |
9 |
|
6 |
4 |
Southwest
Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums
missing 2
N = 24 Mean =
24.9 Total = 597.6
1.000 3.600 3.600 4.500 4.500 5.000 5.000 7.700 10.00 10.10 18.30 22.80 23.00 23.10 24.00 25.00 25.00 28.00 29.00 36.00 37.90 50.00 60.00 140.0
Male Imputed Income missing 2
N = 17 Mean =
33.9 Total = 576.3
7.000 8.000 10.00 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 43.00 46.00 50.00 186.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 28 Mean =
14.5 Total = 406.0
0.6000 1.500 1.500 1.800 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.300 3.000 3.000 3.300 4.500 4.500 7.000 7.500 8.000 12.00 12.10 12.40 12.60 15.00 15.00 19.30 30.60 41.00 46.80 49.00 85.00
Female Cost Penalties
N = 11 Mean =
9.2 Total = 101.2
1.500 2.000 2.700 5.000 5.500 5.800 6.500 8.000 14.00 18.00 32.50
Southwest
Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against
Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs
– central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw
– north west
Sw – south west T
- Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F –
female L – lawyer sr – self
represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
|
Judge |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Case |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Description |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
5.5 K fine for first contempt and 7.5 K fine for second contempt, fines made post bankruptcy debt, security denied, unstated cost penalty |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
L |
Bubis v. Jones, 2000 CanLII 22571 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Both man and wife found in contempt, suspended sentences, custody reversed to wife |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Court finds man guilty of contempt for failing to submit disclosure on it’s own motion, 5 days in jail |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.3 |
3.3 K costs for variation, 3.3 K retroactive arrears, 1.4 K credit card lump, 10.5 K arrears, FRO may apply for commital of there’s a default, previous 3 K cost penalty by Harper J |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
F |
F |
Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.8 |
Wife gets 1.8 K in costs from interim motion |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Deelstra v. Van Osch, 2003 CanLII 2007 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
30.6 |
Divorce action, 4 day trial, wife gets custody 30.6 K |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Dietrich v. Franklin, 2003 CanLII 41467 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
41.0 |
Divorce action and appeal, 41 K costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Giguere v. Giguere, 2004 CanLII 5004 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.1 |
Trial of support, 12.1 K costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
49.0 |
Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial, 12 K more costs of appeal in 2005, 36 K retroactive support, 10.7 K total monthly support |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
F |
F |
Morrison v. Morrison, 2003 CanLII 1950 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.5 |
Divorce action, 7.5 K costs |
|
Marshman |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
0.6 |
Interim motion 0.6 K costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 4493 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
8.0 |
2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month, 2.7 K per month child support even though father has child more than 40 %, 3.7 to 3 to 2.5 K spousal support per month 8 K costs |
|
Nolan |
F |
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.6 |
Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Biggin v. Maloney, 2006 CanLII 7511 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Simple case, 1.5 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Brennan v. Brennan, 2002 CanLII 2742 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.1 |
Interim motion,both parties claim to have spent over 30 K, 2.1 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2004 CanLII 5858 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
85.0 |
Divorce action, wife gets 85 K |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
DePace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22460 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
19.3 |
Mans pleadings struck 19.3 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Ficca v. Ficca, 2004 CanLII 6226 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.9 |
Motion to change access, 1.9 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
7.0 |
Divorce action, man must pay 7 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Waywell v. Waywell, 2004 CanLII 7577 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
Wife asks 30 K for interim support relief and gets 2 K |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Dias v. Dias, 2005 CanLII 41541 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.3 |
Interim motion on sale of property, 2.3 K costs |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 31729 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
12.4 |
Support variation, 12.4 K costs, 41 K US arrears |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
15.0 |
Mans pleadings struck, house vested to wife as security, 15 K costs |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2006 CanLII 819 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
All issues settled prior to trial except spousal support, 4.5 K costs |
|
Dandie |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Lawson v. Lawson, 2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
15.0 |
105 K costs overturned on appeal and left for new trial judge, 15 K costs of appeal against man |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 5488 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
12.0 |
Divorce action with 3 day trial, wife gets 12 K, husband asks 45 K |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
3 K costs interim motion |
|
Harper |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
3.0 |
Default on support 3.0 K costs, man does not comply with disclosure |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
1.5 K costs interim motion |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
ex |
F |
Sheffiel-Lambros v. Sheffiel, 2005 CanLII 4449 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
4.5 |
Deceased husband does not appear and is given a 4.5 K cost penalty |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
46.8 |
46.8 K costs of divorce action |
|
Ducharme |
M |
Sw |
ex |
M |
Elliott v. Elliott, 2004 CanLII 30969 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
D |
|
Noted in default and an order made for a reference into a pension asset not ruled on at trial |
|
Rogin |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Wigle v. Wigle, 2003 CanLII 2359 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
17 K arrears of spousal support, charging order, costs |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Kohl v. Finnis, 2000 CanLII 22445 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default on support, variation refused, 36 K arrears, mans drivers license suspended |
|
Volgesang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2004 CanLII 34429 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
D |
|
Default on costs and support, threat of pleadings struck and contempt, support order imputed |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
M |
Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, 1 K per month spousal support, no children |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
F |
F |
Dale v. Dale, 2003 CanLII 2006 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive interim possession of family home |
|
Dandie |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Lawson v. Lawson,
2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession and man gets occupancy rent, overturned on appeal |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ep |
|
Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 383 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs |
|
Abbey |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Garlough v. Garlough,
2002 CanLII 2845 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Preservation order against family trust, wife gets house and support |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2003 CanLII 1959 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Security and non dissipation orders against man continued |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Roby v. Roby, 2003 CanLII 2111 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
F |
|
Man declares bankruptcy, multiple contempts, non dissipation order, 12.5 K in costs post bankruptcy, support recovery and reset on actual post bankruptcy income |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
31.0 |
Man claims 41 K income and is imputed to 72 K per year |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
F |
Clewlow v. Clewlow,
2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
25.0 |
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handyman, wife earns 19 K |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
23.0 |
Man imputed to 85 K from previous imputation of 62 K, wife gets ¾ of assets due to lump sum and costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Hofsteede v.
Hofsteede, 2006 CanLII 2052 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
7.0 |
Man claims 76 K income and is imputed to 83 K, wife claims 10 K income and is imputed to 25 K |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
F |
M |
Raptis v. Raptis, 2006 CanLII 25413 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
10.0 |
Man claims a 16 K income and is imputed to 26 K, most arrears rescinded |
|
Templeton |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
46.0 |
Man claims 39 K income, imputed to 85 K |
|
Brokenshire |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
14.0 |
140 K lump sum added to equalization for mans depletion of jointly owned trucking company, average depletion 41 K per year but man imputed to 55 K, wife unemployed imputerd to 12 K, wife gets 1.4 K total support per month |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Babinsky v. Babinsky, 2006 CanLII 32912 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
Man claims 28 K income and is imputed to 41 K, man owes 30 K arrears, 21 K of it to social services |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
186.0 |
Man imputed from 64 K claimed to 250 K, separation agreement overturned and man must pay 3.4 K instead of 2.5 K per month |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Depace v. Michienzi, 2000 CanLII 22560 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
43.0 |
Mans claims ongoing losses and is imputed to 43 K |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2005 CanLII 44188 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
8.0 |
Man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
Dandie |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Lawson v. Lawson,
2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Mans income imputed to 48 K and wifes income imputed to 18 K |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Gibson v. Gibson, 2005 CanLII 5487 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
25.0 |
Unemployed man is imputed to 25 K per year, he recieves 1 L per month spousal saupport for 24 months |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Visnjic v. Visnjic, 2000 CanLII 22592 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
50.0 |
Man says he earns no income and is imputed to 50 K per year |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
|
Man imputed to 150 K, wife imputed to 15 K, Man must pay 3.1 K per month in total support, wife mild |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Kapogiannes v. Kapogiannes, 2000 CanLII 22424 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
Husband claims about 10 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
16.0 |
Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 56 K |
|
Kennedy |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Leckie v. Leckie,
2003 CanLII 1971 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
30.0 |
30 K additional income imputed for consulting |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Marchese v. Marchese,
2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
20.0 |
Man studying for PHD can make extra income, imputed at 20 K per year |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Attwood v. Sharma, 2000 CanLII 22567 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans claim for custody and access dismissed with no hope of succeeding, restraining order |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
D.R.D. v. S.E.G., 2001 CanLII 28122 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Mans suit for damages for fraud over childs paternity dismissed, claim for past support dismissed bur arrears rescinded and support terminated |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
4.5 |
4.5 K lump sum for retroactive child support, 1300 per month spousal support |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
23.0 |
Lump sum of 23 K from severance package, increase in child support retroactive |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Man imputed to 85 K from previous imputation of 62 K, wife gets ¾ of assets due to lump sum and costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
MacKinnon v. MacKinnon, 2004 CanLII 8945 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
36.0 |
Wife gets 49 K in 6 day trial, 12 K more costs of appeal in 2005, 36 K retroactive support, 10.7 K total monthly support |
|
Morrisette |
F |
Sw |
F |
M |
Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
25 K lump sum for compensatory support, 28 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K per month in child support, must keep 250 K insurance policy as security |
|
Abbey |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Larkin v. Labonté, 2002 CanLII 2664 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
60.0 |
60 K unjust enrichment to be paid as a lump sum from mans RRSP |
|
Brokenshire |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
140.0 |
140 K lump sum added to equalization for mans depletion of jointly owned trucking company, average depletion 41 K per year but man imputed to 55 K, wife unemployed imputerd to 12 K, 7.7 K retroactive arrears |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
23.1 |
23.1 K retroactive arrears, separation agreement overturned |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Davis v. Davis, 2003 CanLII 2300 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
3.6 |
Lump sum of 3.6 K for retroactive support, 1.5 K per month ongoing support |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Kocak v. Durco, 2004 CanLII 5054 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
24.0 |
24 K lump sum to woman in 10 year cohabitation relationship, to be paid $ 200 per month |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Leblanc v. Longpre, 2006 CanLII 33319 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
3.6 |
3.6 K Lump sum for retroactive support, portions of separation agreement overturned |
|
Ducharme |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Bechard v. Illingworth, 2003 CanLII 1923 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
5.0 |
Must pay 5 K lump sum in 180 days for not disclosing rental income, man gets 1 K per month spousal support |
|
Ducharme |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Pickard v. Pickard, 2005 CanLII 23688 (ON S.C) |
mj |
L |
5.0 |
5 K retroactive support lump sum |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Benoit v. Benoit, 2000 CanLII 22570 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
7.7 |
7.7 K in retroactive arrears, 2.8 K per month in total ongoing support |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2001 CanLII 28188 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
37.9 |
37.9 K lump sum spousal award, 4 K arrears. 5.9 K retroactive arrears, 1.2 K reimbursement |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Kapogiannes v. Kapogiannes, 2000 CanLII 22424 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.0 |
Lump of 10 K to be paid from 50 K held by court for retroactive support |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
K. M. O. v. L. O., 2004 CanLII 2544 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
22.8 |
Man estranged from adult daughter must pay 22.8 K retroactive lump sum for her masters degree |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Leis v. Leis, 2002 CanLII 2796 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
1.0 |
1 K lump sum for retroactive arrears |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Pacheco v. Pacheco, 2001 CanLII 28116 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
|
Mans pension to be divided as a lump sum limiting ongoing spousal support |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Poole v. Poole, 2001 CanLII 28196 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
10.1 |
10.1 K lump for support arrears and truck payment |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
18.3 |
12.9 K retroactive child support award, 5.4 K retroactive spousal support award |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2001 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
29.0 |
Lump sum of 29 K for occupation rent, man has custody pays wife net support of $ 840 per month, wife unemployed and imputed to 30 K |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Kuzmanovic v. Kuzmanovic, 2001 CanLII 28195 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
50.0 |
Lump sum spousal support of 50 K |
|
Rogin |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Mickle v. Mickle, 2006 CanLII 9150 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
28.0 |
28 K lump sum retroactive support award |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Koch v. Koch, 2001 CanLII 28155 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
L |
25.0 |
25 K lump sum as compensatory support |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
ex |
Ogonowski v. Ogonowska, 2001 CanLII 28175 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
L |
4.5 |
4.5 K lump sum to social services because wife didn’t tell them of husbands employment, 1.3 K arrears |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Pr |
|
Wife gets 21.9 K prejudgment interest |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Kucera v. Kucera, 2005 CanLII 12854 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization, minor |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Wilson v. Wilson, 2002 CanLII 2824 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Pr |
|
Wife gets prejudgment interest on 17.5 K child support arrears |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
M |
Nastasi v. Nastasi, 2006 CanLII 33689 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Mans tries to commit suicide and gets supervised access, wife gets custody, supervised access rescinded, restraining order, man must take medication to have access |
|
Morrissette |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
D .K. v. D. K, 2003 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man charged and acquitted of assault, wife hires private investigators, wife gets custody, denies access, contempt, 2 children don’t want to see man, man gets custody of third child |
|
Nolan |
F |
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both man and wife ask for house, wife gets exclusive possession, mutual non depletion order, restraining order, 12.6 K costs |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Elrafih v. Halbouni, 2004 CanLII 15455 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of domestic assault, wife gets custody |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Snih v. Snih, 2004 CanLII 16815 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harrassment order |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
M |
F |
Sylvester v. Sylvester, 2006 CanLII 36360 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Attwood v. Sharma, 2000 CanLII 22567 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mans claim for custody and access dismissed with no hope of succeeding, restraining order |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Dababneh v. Dababneh, 2003 CanLII 1959 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, equalization payment of 257 K to wife, security and non dissipation orders |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
sr |
F |
Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ro |
|
2 years after divorce judgment man seeks to vary restraining order made |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
L |
Anshasi v. Ramlawi, 2004 CanLII 9558 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault, no children, spousal support 1.6 K per month |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Man charged with assault and acquitted, wife gets interim custody |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
M |
Nastasi v. Nastasi, 2006 CanLII 33689 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Mans tries to commit suicide and gets supervised access, wife gets custody, supervised access rescinded, restraining order |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Hurd v. Hurd, 2006 CanLII 15312 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Man gets interim supervised access after not seeing daughter for 6 weeks, wife gets 1 K cost penalty unless vacated |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Jones v. Scheltgen, 2003 CanLII 2389 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Criminal convictions and charges, drugs and jail, supervised access, access suspended and cut, many conditions |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sa |
|
Domestic assault, threats, jail, denied access, supervised access ordered to be unsupervised if successful, retroactive support |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Weiler v. Phifer, 2007 CanLII 9240 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Wife takes children from Texas to Ontario, husband gets supervied access later changed to unsupervised, husband must deposit his passport to get access, heard in 2005 |
|
Leitch |
F |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Ridout v. Ridout, 2006 CanLII 32914 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
1 K security for costs to continue motion to vary |
|
Morrisette |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Hugel v. Hugel,
2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must keep 250 K insurance policy as security for support, 3.5 K per month in child support, 25 K in retroactive support, 28 K in compensatory spousal support |
|
Nolan |
F |
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
F |
M |
C.J.S. v. S.S., 2005 CanLII 15468 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Joint custody, both man and wife must maintain insurance policies naming the children as beneficiaries |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Fisher v. Fisher,
2006 CanLII 4950 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Must designate wife as beneficiary of life insurance to secure 2.6 K per month support, support drops to 1 K in a year |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Thomson v. Thomson, 2004 CanLII 7356 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Insurance policy and charge binding on estate for security |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
ex |
F |
Gibb v. Gibb, 2004 CanLII 27718 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate children as beneficiaries of life insurance policy, support increased ex parte |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Mans pleadings struck, house vested to wife as security, 15 K costs |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2005 CanLII 44188 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Granger |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Benoit v. Benoit, 2000 CanLII 22570 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Man must designate wife as beneficiary of his 200 K insurance policy, support to be enforceable against mans estate |
|
Jenkins |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
Charging order on his farm for child support, jailed for death threat against wife |
|
Kennedy |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Leckie v. Leckie, 2003 CanLII 1971 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Security for ongoing support by life insurance policy, equalization prepayment of 14 K from sale of home, his sailboat and RRSP |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Adams v. Adams, 2000 CanLII 22550 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
11.7 K per month total support binding on estate, man must keep insurance policy as security for support. |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Bondy v. Bondy, 2004 CanLII 14546 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
98 K life insurance to secure spousal support, wife asks for RRSP too but is denied |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Wife is to be named beneficiary of insurance policy |
|
Patterson |
M |
Sw |
ex |
F |
Sheffiel-Lambros v. Sheffiel, 2005 CanLII 4449 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Sc |
|
27 K proceeds of life insurance designated as security for support ordered paid to daughter from husbands estate |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
McLean v. McLean, 2004 CanLII 34800 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must keep insurance policies as security |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
sr |
M |
Weiler v. Phifer, 2007 CanLII 9240 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Wife takes children from Texas to Ontario, husband gets supervied access later changed to unsupervised, husband must deposit his passport to get access, heard in 2005 |
|
Brokenshire |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Durocher v. Lauzon, 2003 CanLII 8943 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Appeal of uncontested trial after pleadings struck dismissed, no relief except minor change on pension amounts |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
F |
F |
Boucher v. Boucher, 2003 CanLII 39249 (ON C.A.) |
mj |
St |
|
Appeal of pleadings struck dismissed, 3 K costs of appeal |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
L |
Marar v. Marar, 2004 CanLII 15749 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
St |
|
Mans pleadings struck, undefended trial, 15 K costs |
2) Penalties Against Females
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
M |
sr |
D .K. v. D. K, 2003 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
2 contempt motions for denied access, minor or no penalty, father gets make up access, on the third contempt motion Morissette J denies contempt but gives father custody |
|
Desotti |
M |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
C |
|
Wife abducts children, contempt sentence unstated, criminal charges |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
sr |
L |
Bubis v. Jones, 2000 CanLII 22571 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
C |
|
Both man and wife found in contempt, suspended sentences, custody reversed to wife |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
F |
M |
Bowcock v. Bowcock, 2005 CanLII 18193 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.5 |
Husband must call motion to terminate support because of wifes actions, asks for 6.8 K gets 5.5 K |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Verscheure v. Verscheure, 2006 CanLII 13238 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
8.0 |
Divorce, husband gets 8 K costs for interim motion to be offset against his support payments |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
6.5 |
Wife must pay 6.5 K costs for interim motion |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
M |
M |
Al-Mutter v. Al-Ekabi, 2003 CanLII 1945 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
32.5 |
Divorce action, 15 day trial, wife must pay 32.5 K and her lawyer 5 K in costs |
|
Marshman |
F |
Sw |
F |
F |
Miller v. Miller, 2005 CanLII 463 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
1.5 |
Wife motion for supervised access fails 1.5 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Cumpson v. Templeton, 2005 CanLII 50010 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
14.0 |
Husband wins custody and mobility trial, 14 K costs |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
MacRae v. Simpson, 2003 CanLII 2307 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.8 |
Half day motion, husband asks 27.8 K and gets 5.8 K |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Snih v. Snih, 2007 CanLII 20774 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Cts |
18.0 |
Wife loses custody action, husband claims 30 K and gets 18 K |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Walker v. Walker, 2006 CanLII 20095 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
5.0 |
Husband gets 5 K |
|
Cusinato |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Moore v. Riley, 2005 CanLII 24928 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.0 |
2 K costs of interim motion |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Marshall v. Marshall, 2004 CanLII 4015 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Cts |
2.7 |
Custody and access motion, 2.7 K costs |
|
|
|
Sw |
sr |
L |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
F |
|
Mutual non depletion order |
|
Brokenshire |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Masztics v. Masztics, 2003 CanLII 2176 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
12.0 |
Wife unemployed is imputed 12 K income, recieves 1.4 K per month total support and 7.7 K retroactive arrears |
|
Dandie |
M |
Sw |
F |
M |
Lawson v. Lawson,
2004 CanLII 4774 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
|
Mans income imputed to 48 K and wifes income imputed to 18 K |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Dench v. Dench, 2005 CanLII 22211 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
15.0 |
Man imputed to 150 K, wife imputed to 15 K, Man must pay 3.1 K per month in total support, wife mild |
|
Heeney |
M |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Yeo v. Yeo, 2003 CanLII 2276 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
7.0 |
Wife is on unemployment asnd is imputed to former 17 K income, recieves $ 600 per month spousal support, husband has custody |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
L |
L |
Brisebois v. Brisebois, 2006 CanLII 7024 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
6.0 |
Wife imputed from 24 K to 30 K and later varied |
|
Quinn |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2001 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ip |
30.0 |
Lump sum of 29 K for occupation rent to wife, man has custody pays wife net support of $ 840 per month, wife unemployed and imputed to 30 K |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Stoangi v. Petersen, 2006 CanLII 24124 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Ip |
13.0 |
Wife imputed from 49 K to 62 K because she quit her job |
|
Nolan |
F |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Domise v. Oyadiran, 2006 CanLII 2614 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Wifes motion challenging the validity of a US divorce is summarily dismissed |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
Jahangiri-Mavaneh v. Taheri-Zengekani, 2005 CanLII 17771 (ON C.A.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Summary judgment dismissal of wifes support action overturned on appeal |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
sr |
L.C.M. v. C.A.V., 2003 CanLII 47888 (ON S.C.) |
mj |
Js |
|
Wife denied a trial, husband gets custody |
|
Campbell |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
MacRae v. Simpson, 2002 CanLII 2723 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Js |
|
Womans motion to reopen separation agreement is dismissed by summary judgment |
|
Morrisette |
F |
Sw |
M |
F |
J.E.H. v. W.V.D., 2004 CanLII 16460 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Both parents have been convicted of assault, Wife is imprisoned and man gets custody, custody reversed to mother |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
M |
sr |
Snih v. Snih, 2004 CanLII 16815 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual non harassment order |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
M |
F |
Sylvester v. Sylvester, 2006 CanLII 36360 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Ro |
|
Mutual restraining order |
|
Volgelsang |
M |
Sw |
sr |
L |
J.E.H. v. W.V.D., 2004 CanLII 16460 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sa |
|
Charged with assault, jail, gets supervised access self represented, both have been charged and convicted before, then unsupervised, then sole custody with lawyer |
|
Rady |
F |
Sw |
F |
M |
C.J.S. v. S.S., 2005 CanLII 15468 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Joint custody, both man and wife must maintain insurance policies naming the children as beneficiaries |
|
Rogin |
M |
Sw |
M |
F |
Ridland v. Ridland, 2002 CanLII 49519 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Spousal support payments made binding on estate of wife |
|
Vogelsang |
M |
Sw |
M |
M |
McLean v. McLean, 2004 CanLII 34800 (ON S.C.) |
mn |
Sc |
|
Both husband and wife must keep insurance policies as security |